Sir it's 21 days lockdown no matter what is happening outside ...we are with you and with your classes waiting to learn more and more n I am sure I will learn the laws with the help of only u sir ..I am so much thankful to you
Sir i have query regarding sec.21 n 22 As mentioned in sec.21,such contract is not voidable,then what would be the status of such contract? Is it Valid or void? Bcoz as you said8:09 that for sec.22 such contract is not voidable as because of unilateral mistake of party and remians valid.
Ur lectures are amazing sir .. one thing I want to ask .. are ur lectures enough for mains exam also and which books we have to refer along with ur lectures if required??
Lectures r enough, u just need to refer the bare acts and obviously the case law study for which u need to subscribe Supreme Court cases or RCR... U need not to follow any etc books, SSC OR RCR sharps ur mind and clear all ur doubts
They are taking about the foreign law which is not to be presumed to be in the knowledge of the common man. So mistake as to foreign law is considered to be equal to a mistake of fact
Sir, Voidable contract means it can be declare valid or void at the option of aggrieved party. and non voidable contract means it is VALID contract..?, please help
A voidable contract, unlike a void contract, is a valid contract which may be either affirmed or rejected at the option of one of the parties. At most, one party to the contract is bound. The unbound party may repudiate the contract, at which time the contract becomes void
Sir section 22 says contract is not voidable if one party is under mistake of fact but in case lake vs simmons u told it is void so it means it can be void from it commencement but cannot be declared voidable
Sir it's 21 days lockdown no matter what is happening outside ...we are with you and with your classes waiting to learn more and more n I am sure I will learn the laws with the help of only u sir ..I am so much thankful to you
Best Guruji😊 thanku so much
Sir your videos help me a lot
Thank you sir ❤❤😊😊
Lecture is amazing 😍
Beautifully explained 🙏
Again rocking video😊
Thank you g
U r exorbitant jurist sir salute to your work
Great explanation sir
Sir thank you so much..your lectures are 👌
Respected Sir thank you. it is very helpful to understand provisions clearly .
sr plz tpa ki series bhi kra digiye
G
very nice video lecture sir thank you so much uploaded this video lecture
🙏🙏
Sir please make case laws clear
Thanks sir ji
💯💯thanks🙏🙇 😎
Thank you very much, Sir
Sir i have query regarding sec.21 n 22
As mentioned in sec.21,such contract is not voidable,then what would be the status of such contract?
Is it Valid or void?
Bcoz as you said8:09 that for sec.22 such contract is not voidable as because of unilateral mistake of party and remians valid.
Contacts remain valid in section 21, but section only deals with the mistake of law not otherwise
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 🙏thanku so much🙏
Section 64 ,65 par detailed vedio banao isko doosro parts se relate karke
Nicely explained
Sir please explain illustration of section 21
Good afternoon sir g
Sec 22 ki koi example bta dyen plez ?
Thanku sir g...
Ur lectures are amazing sir .. one thing I want to ask .. are ur lectures enough for mains exam also and which books we have to refer along with ur lectures if required??
Lectures r enough, u just need to refer the bare acts and obviously the case law study for which u need to subscribe Supreme Court cases or RCR... U need not to follow any etc books, SSC OR RCR sharps ur mind and clear all ur doubts
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 sir, RCR kya hai ?
Recent criminal reports,
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 thank you sir 🙏
Be safe sir, happy teachers day sir
Thank you g
Sir, so Jones had returned the goods as per sec 65 ?
sir why not the case " Lake v. simmons" comes under fraud??
Respected sir, you also be safe and one more request, please make a video on section 63.. Of ICA
Will surely do once we reached at section 63
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 sure sir, with your convenience... 🙏🙏😊😊😊💙💙
Thku sir😊
Sir please make more videos on Bare fact ❣️❣️❣️🙏
In hindi
Sir, S.21 clear nhi h shi se jo 2nd line h mistake as to law not in force in india has same effect as mistake of fact???
They are taking about the foreign law which is not to be presumed to be in the knowledge of the common man. So mistake as to foreign law is considered to be equal to a mistake of fact
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 thanks sir😊😊
Pls sir koi example dedo koi iska .
THank u sooo much sir🙏
Sir, Voidable contract means it can be declare valid or void at the option of aggrieved party.
and non voidable contract means it is VALID contract..?, please help
A voidable contract, unlike a void contract, is a valid contract which may be either affirmed or rejected at the option of one of the parties. At most, one party to the contract is bound. The unbound party may repudiate the contract, at which time the contract becomes void
Dear sir, you mistaken me, my question is what is non voidable contract..? Is it valid or void contract .
I is a valid contract
Sir section 22 says contract is not voidable if one party is under mistake of fact but in case lake vs simmons u told it is void so it means it can be void from it commencement but cannot be declared voidable
👌
Thank u sir
Sir I want to ask, under sec 22 the unilateral mistake is considered or not?
You are contradicting things ( no offense please)
Sry I didn't get ur point
Thank you sir