The way of your teaching is excellent. At the start of your lecture you said that this lecture is going to be boring but I didn't find the boring part in the whole lecture and that's all because of the way u teach.
Been looking for this my whole adult life, so excited to go through all the lessons, thank you Doc. But why would you make all this available for free? I am not complaining though, love it.
Fabulous lecture professor and massive thanks for uploading such videos on RUclips. However, there was one typo in the 52:08 where alpha2 value was supposed to be -2 to sum those vectors u and v to be 0.
The statement "a set of vectors is linearly dependent if none of the vectors in the set can be expressed as a linear combination of the other vectors in the set" is incorrect because it is describing linear independence, not linear dependence.
Unfortunately, @ALEXANDERLUYA, I don't have it as well. But I think that Dr. Pettit is a professor in Canada... We could ask him by his e-mail. Regards.
Are there errors on orthogonal projections ? Instead of (Sqrt(17))**2 --> Sqrt(17)*Sqrt(4) ?. Why would proj v->u is equal to proj u->v even slope would differ.
@@1970mza Discord didn't work out so I am in the process of creating a website to allow for the downloading of my PDF slides and software files :) I am sorry for the wait and thank you for your patience :)
In the review of Linearly Dependent/Independent, is the definition correct? I think it should be "A set of vectors is linearly independent if ...", not " A set of vectors is linearly dependent if ...". Can someone help me check my understanding, please? Thanks in advance.
congratualtions on becoming a doctor. I watched your videos in 2021 when i took the finite element course. It helped alot
Many thanks for posting these lectures here. Really very helpful
Sir, you are fantastic if have already studied this, but the amount of clarification getting by watching this lecture is amazing
These lectures are amazing, thanks for uploading! Could you please upload a pdf of the slides for printing?
The way of your teaching is excellent. At the start of your lecture you said that this lecture is going to be boring but I didn't find the boring part in the whole lecture and that's all because of the way u teach.
thanks// these lectures covered all the topics that are needed to understand. these series will be helpful for further modeling in the software
Very easy-to-understand and fun to watch =)) many jokes actually help to keep the lecture exciting! Thank a lot
I like how you gone over all the prerequisites like linear algebra, No such thing in my university.
Hi Clayton
If you more videos on non-linear FEM, please upload.
Thanks
Been looking for this my whole adult life, so excited to go through all the lessons, thank you Doc. But why would you make all this available for free? I am not complaining though, love it.
Fabulous lecture professor and massive thanks for uploading such videos on RUclips. However, there was one typo in the 52:08 where alpha2 value was supposed to be -2 to sum those vectors u and v to be 0.
The statement "a set of vectors is linearly dependent if none of the vectors in the set can be expressed as a linear combination of the other vectors in the set" is incorrect because it is describing linear independence, not linear dependence.
skimming this because the last time i did FEA was in 2016.
cheers
Hello Clayton, is it possible to get slides of all your lectures? Kind Regards
Thank you very much for these lectures. May I ask if the topics covered in this video is all the linear algebra needed for the Finite Element Method?
1:25:47, could you explain again, I think they should be e'1 = [1/sin(theta), 1/cos(theta)] and e'2 = [-1/sin(theta), 1/cos(theta)]
thank you for your lectures. you are great!
Thanks for this amazing course. 👍🏻👍🏻
Your slides make this class soft! Greetings from Brazil!
Hi,have you got the slides?
Hello, No, just watched your video. But if you can share it with me, I would be grateful.
@@thiagomarquesivanisk I have sent an email to the creator a few days ago,but no replies yet
Unfortunately, @ALEXANDERLUYA, I don't have it as well. But I think that Dr. Pettit is a professor in Canada...
We could ask him by his e-mail.
Regards.
Wow great lecture sir.
I don't know, I think what was written as the definition of linear dependence is wrong?
Though your explanation is correct.
I like this guy man! the way he said pick ur poison for picking up textbook...lol
Thank you very much
Are there errors on orthogonal projections ? Instead of (Sqrt(17))**2 --> Sqrt(17)*Sqrt(4) ?. Why would proj v->u is equal to proj u->v even slope would differ.
There is an error at 1:11:28, instead of sqrt17 *sqrt5, it should be (sqrt17)squared (or simply 17)
Hi, Do you have any of these lecture notes to be downloaded? Thank you in advance
@@ClaytonPettit Thank you very much for this. Is the server public yet? Cheers.
@@ClaytonPettit Can you please update the discord link.
@@1970mza Discord didn't work out so I am in the process of creating a website to allow for the downloading of my PDF slides and software files :) I am sorry for the wait and thank you for your patience :)
@@ClaytonPettit Thanks
@@ClaytonPettit very good lecture! thanks!
Can we get access to pdf notes by some way?
At 1:08:24 e2 should be [-1/√2, 1/√2, 0] according to figure drawn isn't it?
time 1.20.30, in triple product: u.(v x w) = u1(v2w2-v3w2) + u2(v2w1-v1w2) + u3(v1w2-v2w1). instead of neglecting w terms. am i right or typo error.
Is the pdf version of these lectures available yet?
At 1:11:41 you use in the denominator norm of u. Why? Cause the formula says just take the norm of v and square it. Did i miss smth?
This was a typo, it should be Sqrt[17]^2 :)
@@ClaytonPettit thx for reply. And appreciate the content 👌
@@ClaytonPettit pin this comment 🥰
Please provide notes for the lectures, a very humble request.
Thank Sir
how about lectures nonlinear finite element at large strains?
Hello
Did you share the ppt anywhere?
In the review of Linearly Dependent/Independent, is the definition correct? I think it should be "A set of vectors is linearly independent if ...", not " A set of vectors is linearly dependent if ...". Can someone help me check my understanding, please? Thanks in advance.
You are correct, this was a typo in the notes :P
I need to understand how one can build a career by studying these fields?
is there any way how to get the assignments?
Did you found them?
Thanks a lot. It was really helpful.
At 20:16, f(x0) should be read as f(x), isn't it?
Hello doctor can I get the FEM lectures thank you
What is the pre-requisite to this course?
DE
🧘♂ you are totally wrong this lecture is fun, thank you 🌸
At 52:32 , is alpha2 equal to -2 in the linearly dependant case.?
same here. alpha 2 have to be equal to -2 to make the equation hold. Hopefully, someone would be kind enough to explain this...
52:26 That's what I thought. But at the end of the day if alpha is not zero, then they are linearly dependent.
@@mohammedfaizan3013 lol thanks bro. I passed this exam in the previous semester.
@@pranav9339 congratulations bro!!
yes
1:43:02
Take home test are the most stressful
.
17:54
59:40
1:14:34
1:57:53