Are you dependent on RUclips and social media to gain Islamic knowledge? Download the Thaqlain App today by visiting app.thaqlain.org Also, if you found this content beneficial, please take a moment to donate at thaqlain.org/support.
Thank you sayyed for yet another great and informative video that im about to enjoy and learn from InshAllah, bless the hands that put the holy books behind you in order for this episode
Wondering how the death of the prophet saww will be covered. Since the hadith in "Sahih" Bukhari from Aisha, or the "Sahih" one in Sunan Abi Dawood from Abu Hurayra (subhanallah you just need a hadith from Anas and you will have the big three fabricators) says that the prophet supposedly died because the poison cut his aorta. Which is extremely objectionable since the Quran literally says in Surah Al-Haqqah in verses 69:44 to 69:46 that if the prophet said a lie about God, God would have cut off his aorta! So either the greatest of all creation said a lie about God, which would discredit everything, including the Quran, or that Bukhari is not entirely authentic which would make a sunni a heretic... or that the Shia of Ahl Al-Bayt are correct like always and it is impossible that the prophet would die due to his aorta cut off. Also I have heard from a minority, usually sectarian and hatred filled Shia, that supposedly the prophet died from Aisha and Abu Bakr based on the hadith in Bukhari where Aisha and Abu Bakr forced the prophet to swallow medecine even after the prophet forbid then from doing so and got angry at them after the fact, but I don't see how this hadith somehow proves that this medecine killed the prophet saww which is a huge jump and not based on any real evidence I feel.
The supposedly hints are directed towards Aisha And hafsa who forced the prophet to swallow medicine not Abu Bakr. The fact that the prophet was poisoned has been mention by the prophet himself in one of the Shia narrations. Although Abu Bakr and some the other companions did try to kill the prophet. According to Shia narrations.
The most accurate opinion is the opinion you mentioned at the bottom. Also, it's not a minority opinion, it's actually the majority opinion however, it's just that due to taqiyyah, majority of the scholars had to cite the narrative pertaining to the Jewish women which is obviously false as the Sayyed clearly demonstrated. The evidence I've seen for the opinion you mentioned are as follows: We have ahadith in our literature which state that the secret the Prophet (sawa) disclosed to Hafsa mentioned in Surah Tahrim was that Abu Bakr and Umar would be the caliphs after him (historically). After this, Hafsa told Aisha and then Aisha told Abu Bakr and then Abu Bakr went to Umar wanting to verify this information (since he knows his daughter has a reputation for lying). They proceeded to say something along the lines, "If this is true, let's act on it," and then they proceeded to poison the Holy Prophet (sawa). Also, if you clearly analyse surah Tahrim, it's highly problematic to conclude that God Almighty (swt) is threatening divorce to these two wives simply over some honey or the narrative relating to Maria Al Qibtiliyya. Look at 66:6 and the way Hellfire is spelled. This is the ONLY time that throughout the entire Quran that Allah (swt) spells nar with a double fatha on the ra (all the other times in the Quran, Allah (swt) places an alif and laam before nar). The significance of this is Allah (swt) is warning the believers that if they have enemies from their family and kin (such as Aisha and Hafsa), Allah (swt) is going to place them in an unknown fire (demonstrated by the different spelling of nar). It's very problematic to think that Allah (swt) would reveal ayat in such a manner merely over honey or the Maria Al Qibtiliyya (ra) incident. Even examining other aspects of the Surah, clearly Allah (swt) is referring to something else. For example, look at 66:2 and the name which God Almighty (swt) uses to refer to himself. Why would he specifically use this name, "All-Knowing and Wise," in the context of the respective ayah (absolving oaths). Using this inquiry and corroborating with hadiths found in our literature (these traditions in our literature tell us that the secret the Prophet disclosed to Hafsa was that Abu Bakr and Umar would be the caliphs after him (historically)), the reason why God Almighty (swt) uses this name and the reason why he told the Prophet (sawa) to disclose this secret is that he wants his Prophet (sawa) to go out in the best way possible, as a shahid. Another piece of evidence is the one you mentioned relating to the supposed "medicine" that Aisha administrated to the Prophet (sawa) while he was in a state of sickness. If you look at the hadiths in light of one another, it seems the following occurred (this is all from Sunni literature). 1.Aisha and Hafsa tried to administer "medicine" into the Holy Prophet (sawa) 2. The Prophet (sawa) forbade them from doing so. 3. While the Prophet (sawa) was in a state of unconsciousness, Aisha administrated the medicine into the blessed mouth of the Holy Prophet (saw) 4. When the Prophet (sawa) woke up, he rebuked Aisha and Hafsa for administrating the medicine. 5. Aisha made an excuse stating that the Prophet (sawa) didn't want the medicine to be administrated as patients typically don't want medicine administrated even though the medicine is beneficial for them. This excuse by her is clearly nonsensical since the Prophet (sawa) is the master of medicine itself so how come he wouldn't want something administrated which is beneficial for him/ 6. Aisha proceeds to accuse Abbas (the uncle of the Prophet) of inciting them to administer the "medicine." 7. The Prophet (sawa) absolved Abbas from her accusation. 8. The Prophet (sawa) then proceed to command all the wives of the Prophet (sawa) including Aisha, Hafsa, Maymunah (ra), and Umm Salama (who actually had to break her fast) to take from the same "medicine" that was administrated by Aisha and Hafsa into the mouth of the Prophet (sawa). If this "medicine" was truly harmless, why would the Prophet (sawa) instruct his wives to take from the same "medicine." 9. You may be thinking to yourself, "Why didn't the wives of the Prophet (sawa) die from the medicine if it's harmful." Clearly, Aisha and Hafsa switched the harmful substance to a harmless substance and the wives of the Prophet (sawa) took from the harmless substance. 10. The condition of the Prophet (sawa) proceeded to exacerbate and he (sawa), the greatest creation of all proceeded to be martyred. This is how the enemies of Allah (swt) and his noble and immaculate Messenger (sawa) killed the greatest of Allah (swt) creation. 11. Aisha and the party of Aisha couldn't hide the notion that the Prophet (sawa) was poisoned since the traces of poison would be present on his body so they had to fabricate ahadith stating that the poison was the poison which was administrated to the Prophet (sawa) at Khaybar. Even if this is not the narrative, the narrative relating to the jewish women would clearly dismissed for the obvious point you mentioned. Aisha is literally claim that the Prophet (sawa) had his aorta cut off which is literally what Allah (swt) warns him of if he fabricates anything against him. Clearly, Aisha is accusing the Prophet (sawa) of being a liar.
A Salam u alaykum, I have a sincere question sheikh. How comes the prophet Salallahu Alayhi wa Ale considered eating from this sheep in the first place? I mean, wasn’t she Jewish? Does that mean we can eat the meat slaughtered by Jews? Baraakallahu feekum
Are you dependent on RUclips and social media to gain Islamic knowledge? Download the Thaqlain App today by visiting app.thaqlain.org
Also, if you found this content beneficial, please take a moment to donate at thaqlain.org/support.
May Allah bless your soul sheikh. Such valuable knowledge! Thank you
I love all lectures, but I also loved how books in bookshelf well organized in this lecture :) , love you all JazakAllah
Thank you sayyed for yet another great and informative video that im about to enjoy and learn from InshAllah, bless the hands that put the holy books behind you in order for this episode
You are doing the greatest job. ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Alhamdulilah.
❤❤❤
Wondering how the death of the prophet saww will be covered.
Since the hadith in "Sahih" Bukhari from Aisha, or the "Sahih" one in Sunan Abi Dawood from Abu Hurayra (subhanallah you just need a hadith from Anas and you will have the big three fabricators) says that the prophet supposedly died because the poison cut his aorta. Which is extremely objectionable since the Quran literally says in Surah Al-Haqqah in verses 69:44 to 69:46 that if the prophet said a lie about God, God would have cut off his aorta! So either the greatest of all creation said a lie about God, which would discredit everything, including the Quran, or that Bukhari is not entirely authentic which would make a sunni a heretic... or that the Shia of Ahl Al-Bayt are correct like always and it is impossible that the prophet would die due to his aorta cut off.
Also I have heard from a minority, usually sectarian and hatred filled Shia, that supposedly the prophet died from Aisha and Abu Bakr based on the hadith in Bukhari where Aisha and Abu Bakr forced the prophet to swallow medecine even after the prophet forbid then from doing so and got angry at them after the fact, but I don't see how this hadith somehow proves that this medecine killed the prophet saww which is a huge jump and not based on any real evidence I feel.
The supposedly hints are directed towards Aisha And hafsa who forced the prophet to swallow medicine not Abu Bakr. The fact that the prophet was poisoned has been mention by the prophet himself in one of the Shia narrations. Although Abu Bakr and some the other companions did try to kill the prophet. According to Shia narrations.
As Sayed said, we will go into detail. It is yet to be recorded so we too are looking forward to it.
Scary...
Quran and prove of Hadith
That our beloved saww disobayed Alloh ta ala
It means
The fabricator do not know what is quran said
The most accurate opinion is the opinion you mentioned at the bottom. Also, it's not a minority opinion, it's actually the majority opinion however, it's just that due to taqiyyah, majority of the scholars had to cite the narrative pertaining to the Jewish women which is obviously false as the Sayyed clearly demonstrated. The evidence I've seen for the opinion you mentioned are as follows: We have ahadith in our literature which state that the secret the Prophet (sawa) disclosed to Hafsa mentioned in Surah Tahrim was that Abu Bakr and Umar would be the caliphs after him (historically). After this, Hafsa told Aisha and then Aisha told Abu Bakr and then Abu Bakr went to Umar wanting to verify this information (since he knows his daughter has a reputation for lying). They proceeded to say something along the lines, "If this is true, let's act on it," and then they proceeded to poison the Holy Prophet (sawa). Also, if you clearly analyse surah Tahrim, it's highly problematic to conclude that God Almighty (swt) is threatening divorce to these two wives simply over some honey or the narrative relating to Maria Al Qibtiliyya. Look at 66:6 and the way Hellfire is spelled. This is the ONLY time that throughout the entire Quran that Allah (swt) spells nar with a double fatha on the ra (all the other times in the Quran, Allah (swt) places an alif and laam before nar). The significance of this is Allah (swt) is warning the believers that if they have enemies from their family and kin (such as Aisha and Hafsa), Allah (swt) is going to place them in an unknown fire (demonstrated by the different spelling of nar). It's very problematic to think that Allah (swt) would reveal ayat in such a manner merely over honey or the Maria Al Qibtiliyya (ra) incident. Even examining other aspects of the Surah, clearly Allah (swt) is referring to something else. For example, look at 66:2 and the name which God Almighty (swt) uses to refer to himself. Why would he specifically use this name, "All-Knowing and Wise," in the context of the respective ayah (absolving oaths). Using this inquiry and corroborating with hadiths found in our literature (these traditions in our literature tell us that the secret the Prophet disclosed to Hafsa was that Abu Bakr and Umar would be the caliphs after him (historically)), the reason why God Almighty (swt) uses this name and the reason why he told the Prophet (sawa) to disclose this secret is that he wants his Prophet (sawa) to go out in the best way possible, as a shahid. Another piece of evidence is the one you mentioned relating to the supposed "medicine" that Aisha administrated to the Prophet (sawa) while he was in a state of sickness. If you look at the hadiths in light of one another, it seems the following occurred (this is all from Sunni literature).
1.Aisha and Hafsa tried to administer "medicine" into the Holy Prophet (sawa)
2. The Prophet (sawa) forbade them from doing so.
3. While the Prophet (sawa) was in a state of unconsciousness, Aisha administrated the medicine into the blessed mouth of the Holy Prophet (saw)
4. When the Prophet (sawa) woke up, he rebuked Aisha and Hafsa for administrating the medicine.
5. Aisha made an excuse stating that the Prophet (sawa) didn't want the medicine to be administrated as patients typically don't want medicine administrated even though the medicine is beneficial for them. This excuse by her is clearly nonsensical since the Prophet (sawa) is the master of medicine itself so how come he wouldn't want something administrated which is beneficial for him/
6. Aisha proceeds to accuse Abbas (the uncle of the Prophet) of inciting them to administer the "medicine."
7. The Prophet (sawa) absolved Abbas from her accusation.
8. The Prophet (sawa) then proceed to command all the wives of the Prophet (sawa) including Aisha, Hafsa, Maymunah (ra), and Umm Salama (who actually had to break her fast) to take from the same "medicine" that was administrated by Aisha and Hafsa into the mouth of the Prophet (sawa). If this "medicine" was truly harmless, why would the Prophet (sawa) instruct his wives to take from the same "medicine."
9. You may be thinking to yourself, "Why didn't the wives of the Prophet (sawa) die from the medicine if it's harmful." Clearly, Aisha and Hafsa switched the harmful substance to a harmless substance and the wives of the Prophet (sawa) took from the harmless substance.
10. The condition of the Prophet (sawa) proceeded to exacerbate and he (sawa), the greatest creation of all proceeded to be martyred. This is how the enemies of Allah (swt) and his noble and immaculate Messenger (sawa) killed the greatest of Allah (swt) creation.
11. Aisha and the party of Aisha couldn't hide the notion that the Prophet (sawa) was poisoned since the traces of poison would be present on his body so they had to fabricate ahadith stating that the poison was the poison which was administrated to the Prophet (sawa) at Khaybar.
Even if this is not the narrative, the narrative relating to the jewish women would clearly dismissed for the obvious point you mentioned. Aisha is literally claim that the Prophet (sawa) had his aorta cut off which is literally what Allah (swt) warns him of if he fabricates anything against him. Clearly, Aisha is accusing the Prophet (sawa) of being a liar.
Asalam Alikum
A Salam u alaykum,
I have a sincere question sheikh.
How comes the prophet Salallahu Alayhi wa Ale considered eating from this sheep in the first place?
I mean, wasn’t she Jewish? Does that mean we can eat the meat slaughtered by Jews?
Baraakallahu feekum
Alaykum Salaam. Sayed has answered this concern already in this episode.
I have a question was zaynab bint al harith the niece of marhab or was she the sister of marhab
We are not aware of this 🙂
Leave the naration / story against Quran
The only sahih story only quran
Hadith or sirah base on assumptions or allegations