@@The-Catthat's wrong. he was arrested, because he had the data, but didn't share it. there is a difference between that you can help, and don't want (telegram, unencrypted messages), and you want to help, but can't (signal, gives the timestamp of account creation, and last online, as that's everything they have)
If you mean Discord can still see them then. Yes most likely. If you mean hackers can access it then it's not likely since (good) encryption cannot be easily brute forced without a super computer and even then would take too long to brute force with the current technology unless quantum computing continues to improve. The biggest vulnerability to a hacker is you. Gaining access to your account through social engineering.
I think that encrypting voice and video also allows them to never have to moderate people who stream movies and shows over it to their friends and family.
Even though any random users can report for that specific reason as of now? Wonder how that all would work.... seems like a loophole that could start a huge riaa lawsuit quickly
@@dertythegrower Well I mean they can't run automated scanning of voice and video and streams if they can't see it. Personally, I would never report someone for doing that.
It still feels wrong for survivors to be able to sell the voice and likeness of the dead. Naked greed on the part of the buyers is the only reason for it.
Serious question, when a company pays the FCC for breaches, where does it go? Sure doesn't seem like it's going anywhere helpful. $13M, i would think, should be leveraged to force them to upgrade security and somehow prove they're doing so through 3rd party auditing. Or, ya know, give me my check for $0.37.
according to almighty ai, "settlement from an FCC consumer privacy investigation can be used for data inventory, data retention schedules, and privacy-enhancing technologies."
Try reporting someone doxing you to them. Unless you're on the same server or friends with the person - it's next to impossible, even if you supply the ID and screenshot. The worst part, they even tell you to have no contact with the person. Of course, they're still "looking into it", as if anything will happen.
@@youdontneedmyrealnamedepends on how you define doxing. if someone you know in rl just writes name + address, i would count that slas doxed, even if not linked with your online accounts
@youdontneedmyrealname Don't jinxs it like OGUsers or breach forums 2.0* . No one is anonymous rule of cyber security from a student studying cyber security in university level.
This discord security win is all just fluff, they don't record calls in the first place, sense thats storage intensive. This is literally just a marketing gimmick to make it seem like discord is more private and secure.
When I heard that I was so happy. Back when Temu first came out some people were asking me to make an account so they could refer me and get free money and I decided not to. Fast forward, I still haven't used them, and now they have possibly had a data breach. Happy I made that decision.
I'd prefer if NOBODY tries to find a way to use my data against me. Even if it's a 36p video call with 1kbps audio quality, I don't consent to the govt's seeing that.
I'm so glad you support monerodonations now it's always nice to see adoption, the more monero options the better thats what I say so eventually hopefully reach widespread adoption
Lithium batteries will NOT explode LIKE THAT unless they are tampered with and then the explosion becomes basically random and uncontrollable, and probably immediate. There are a number of things that can make a lithium battery explode, but the kind of explosion and the timing of it vary greatly, and the kind of DETONATION we see in that widely seen video of that guy in a market on whom something in his belt explodes violently I don't think can be achieved with mere digital hacking. At best, with remote measures, without phisically tampering with the device, you may make the battery burst in flames, most probably preceded by hisssing and smoking, NOT a DETONATION, which requires the combustion of the explosive material to travel the material at faster than sound speeeds to generate a shockwave. Without that, yes you get an "explosion" but not the type you normally think of, and not the type seen in the video. Again, to achieve what we saw in that video with a lithium battery, you'd have to damage it severely and then it's anyone's guess when it will explode. It may even explode on the face of those performing the modification. Not a good option. My point is, even though you CAN, unders some circumstances, make a lithium battery explode, it's not reliable, you probably won't get a BANG, and the most probable explanation for what happened is that actual proper explosives were planted inside the devices, with some way to remotelly triggering the detonation. It's highly unlikely that this was achieved just by tripping the charge circuit on the batteries to damage them and induce an explosion, or any other method that relies on the batteries themselves as explosive material. Lithium batteries make for a very finnicky explosive. Better use something specifically made for the job.
Optery is a con, i am in UK and created an account using my real name and a fake USA address and other fake details. Now ospery has found me on 24 databases. How can that be possible lol
Mastadon was promoted by state actors on Biden team... pretty obvious junk network since the first day to now, literal epitome of the word echo chamber for one side.
im willing to bet 1 Monero that Discord's "encrypted audio & video calls" have a backdoor
Required by U.S. and EU regulations... That is why Telegram CEO was arrested he refused to leave a backdoor open for the western big brother eyes
define backdoor?
@@The-Catthat's wrong. he was arrested, because he had the data, but didn't share it. there is a difference between that you can help, and don't want (telegram, unencrypted messages), and you want to help, but can't (signal, gives the timestamp of account creation, and last online, as that's everything they have)
If you mean Discord can still see them then. Yes most likely. If you mean hackers can access it then it's not likely since (good) encryption cannot be easily brute forced without a super computer and even then would take too long to brute force with the current technology unless quantum computing continues to improve.
The biggest vulnerability to a hacker is you. Gaining access to your account through social engineering.
ssl is a joke for them
I think that encrypting voice and video also allows them to never have to moderate people who stream movies and shows over it to their friends and family.
@@dabrams84 Hmmm.. That's an interesting idea... I wonder if they'll do the same with messages
Even though any random users can report for that specific reason as of now? Wonder how that all would work.... seems like a loophole that could start a huge riaa lawsuit quickly
@@dertythegrower Well I mean they can't run automated scanning of voice and video and streams if they can't see it.
Personally, I would never report someone for doing that.
It still feels wrong for survivors to be able to sell the voice and likeness of the dead. Naked greed on the part of the buyers is the only reason for it.
Pls check your mic gains before recording. Two different volumes are annoying!
One Love!
Always forward, never ever backward!!
☀☀☀
💚💛❤
🙏🏿🙏🙏🏼
Serious question, when a company pays the FCC for breaches, where does it go? Sure doesn't seem like it's going anywhere helpful. $13M, i would think, should be leveraged to force them to upgrade security and somehow prove they're doing so through 3rd party auditing.
Or, ya know, give me my check for $0.37.
according to almighty ai, "settlement from an FCC consumer privacy investigation can be used for data inventory, data retention schedules, and privacy-enhancing technologies."
Try reporting someone doxing you to them. Unless you're on the same server or friends with the person - it's next to impossible, even if you supply the ID and screenshot. The worst part, they even tell you to have no contact with the person. Of course, they're still "looking into it", as if anything will happen.
Breaking the number one rule of being on the internet. Anonymity is key. Doxing is difficult with proper opsec.
@@youdontneedmyrealnamedepends on how you define doxing. if someone you know in rl just writes name + address, i would count that slas doxed, even if not linked with your online accounts
@youdontneedmyrealname Don't jinxs it like OGUsers or breach forums 2.0* . No one is anonymous rule of cyber security from a student studying cyber security in university level.
I honestly prefer the encryption on call over text, since I never send messages via Discord lol. Huge win!!!
Agreed it's a win. I wish they would have put it on text though. That would potentially get me to use Discord.
This discord security win is all just fluff, they don't record calls in the first place, sense thats storage intensive.
This is literally just a marketing gimmick to make it seem like discord is more private and secure.
Temu denying a breach happened is exactly what I'd expect from a Chinese or Russian company.
When I heard that I was so happy. Back when Temu first came out some people were asking me to make an account so they could refer me and get free money and I decided not to. Fast forward, I still haven't used them, and now they have possibly had a data breach. Happy I made that decision.
It's an international flaw.
discord is owned by Chinese
Discord needs to encrypt direct messages
I'd prefer if NOBODY tries to find a way to use my data against me. Even if it's a 36p video call with 1kbps audio quality, I don't consent to the govt's seeing that.
I'm so glad you support monerodonations now it's always nice to see adoption, the more monero options the better thats what I say so eventually hopefully reach widespread adoption
Lithium batteries will NOT explode LIKE THAT unless they are tampered with and then the explosion becomes basically random and uncontrollable, and probably immediate.
There are a number of things that can make a lithium battery explode, but the kind of explosion and the timing of it vary greatly, and the kind of DETONATION we see in that widely seen video of that guy in a market on whom something in his belt explodes violently I don't think can be achieved with mere digital hacking. At best, with remote measures, without phisically tampering with the device, you may make the battery burst in flames, most probably preceded by hisssing and smoking, NOT a DETONATION, which requires the combustion of the explosive material to travel the material at faster than sound speeeds to generate a shockwave. Without that, yes you get an "explosion" but not the type you normally think of, and not the type seen in the video.
Again, to achieve what we saw in that video with a lithium battery, you'd have to damage it severely and then it's anyone's guess when it will explode. It may even explode on the face of those performing the modification. Not a good option.
My point is, even though you CAN, unders some circumstances, make a lithium battery explode, it's not reliable, you probably won't get a BANG, and the most probable explanation for what happened is that actual proper explosives were planted inside the devices, with some way to remotelly triggering the detonation. It's highly unlikely that this was achieved just by tripping the charge circuit on the batteries to damage them and induce an explosion, or any other method that relies on the batteries themselves as explosive material.
Lithium batteries make for a very finnicky explosive. Better use something specifically made for the job.
> E2EE
> closed source
yeah I'm gonna pass on that one
Heading for signal.
Is it "certified" or with self signed certificates? Because of most recent concerns regarding back doors.
Like, comment, and shared for the algorithm
Am I the only who just...doesn't like or trust arc?
Optery is a con, i am in UK and created an account using my real name and a fake USA address and other fake details. Now ospery has found me on 24 databases. How can that be possible lol
Care more about getting a donation and you haven’t even given a sufficient sample of the product, you won’t last long.
Did you used to watch Hak5? Their show felt similar to this!
They are like a cnet version of this heh
second and two minutes in woooo
Henry, please answer comments under the Molly video
first?
THIRD
@@TarsteelPCGaming no ur first
Wow ! I am stunned at the lack of users on the mozilla mastodon !
Vivaldi has almost 6000 active monthly users.
It was truly tiny. When I was active at Mozilla, it felt like everyone was on the forums and homegrown channels.
Mastadon was promoted by state actors on Biden team... pretty obvious junk network since the first day to now, literal epitome of the word echo chamber for one side.