Very nice footage! I must admit, the CPKC scheme does look good on the 9375. Also, thank you for using the correct reporting mark for the 2816, many people believe it is now "CPKC 2816" which is incorrect.
Hi Steven KC Railfan and i like yours video is cool & Thanks Steve KC Railfan & Friends Randy & Super Cool CP 2816 4-6-4 & CPKC 9375 & Thanks Steven KC Railfan & Friends Randy
That new paint scheme is awful. It was my least favorite of the five choices. They should have chosen one of the schemes that was reminiscent of the black and red Deramus era paint scheme on the KCS.
Nice video of 2816 & 9375!
Thanks Darryl and glad you enjoyed the video!
Waiting for it back in Winnipeg on the return trip
Nice! Hopefully you’ll get it
Very nice footage! I must admit, the CPKC scheme does look good on the 9375. Also, thank you for using the correct reporting mark for the 2816, many people believe it is now "CPKC 2816" which is incorrect.
Thanks and yeah not sure why people are doing that as the Tender clearly says Canadian Pacific.
@@StevenKCRailfan it sure does, and crews clearly use "CP 2816" when calling signals and speaking with dispatchers and RTC.
@@thompsonriverrailfan yeah because I use CP and KCS Terms on CPKC Trains and CPKC if it’s in the official CPKC Scheme
Hi Steven KC Railfan and i like yours video is cool & Thanks Steve KC Railfan & Friends Randy & Super Cool CP 2816 4-6-4 & CPKC 9375 & Thanks Steven KC Railfan & Friends Randy
Thanks and Thanks for Watching!
Definitely a CPKC GEVO
Thanks and Thanks for Watching!
That new paint scheme is awful. It was my least favorite of the five choices. They should have chosen one of the schemes that was reminiscent of the black and red Deramus era paint scheme on the KCS.
I understand your opinion and it’s handled. I don’t mind this CPKC Scheme