EVProductionBeats only the scientific method. He says that as he is not so arrogant as to assume he knows everything, which in a sense is what you have to do to take a leap of faith and be religious
+League Sucks Ja, und? Dawkins weist keinen Widerspruch in seinen Aussagen und Haltungen auf. „Of course it is“=Selbstverständlichkeit und Sarkasmus stehen in keinem Widerspruch. Bill O'Reilly sollte mal aufhören dem Christlichen Glauben einen abscheulichen und erbärmlichen Ruf zu geben.
Hahaha. Same with Laura Ingram and Christopher Hitchens and his masterful Hitchslap, after she would just wouldn’t let him speak : “we haven’t got more time but please come again” -“I’d love to come again to your programme so I can hear what you think.”
No this actually is a masterclass in interviewing people. You're supposed to make a message stick around in the heads of dumb monkeys, and "when you get an answer maybe I'll listen" is far more memorable than whatever detailed explanation Dawkins was giving, even though Dawkins is *obviously* right.
@@gabrielegenota1480 religion will almost never reasses their beliefs, in a way making it the most non-humble entity of world belief. Science's backbone is built on thinking something, finding out it's wrong and humbly going back to fix it or trying to find an answer, in essence- the most humble of studies.
@@brandonsmith9098 if he's like most Christians I've talked to about morality he probably thinks Christians invented it, that's definitely the vibe he was putting out.
@@brandonsmith9098 no but phrasing it as a "Christian virtue" implies that it started in Christianity. "a virtue embraced by Christianity" would be more precise
he was saying why do we have so much water on the planet? the moon also controls it. without that moon, you would be dead. vast waves would rotate round the world and wash away everything daily. so immediately its very nice to have those two things? and one amino acid forming. Is 10^240 according to an atheist. Francis Crick. and you need two dozen different ones to make a bespoke protein. so that is fortunate. what do you do with one protein? nothing? it rots. you need millions of them. God ends this shit in this year. you all get PROOF. the dead will educate you.
@@estellesstories7467 witch craft is defined by MANIPULATION. in the old movie, double Indemnity, a woman convinces an insurance man, to kill her husband. She uses sex, and manipulates him to kill her husband, for the insurance. that is witch craft. to convince someone to do evil. To get what you want by a strategy. even children do it. they convince their parents to buy them sweets. if i do this? will you do this? politicians are using witch craft. advertisers are using witch craft. all the world does it. buy a coke? Buy a car... here is why our car is better? they try to convince you. i trained as a Graphic Designer, on day one of my University course, the Tutor said - we are trained liars. we embellish the truth, we airbrush out all the flaws. and stretch the models to be taller. we sell lies to the public. you should know this before you continue? and we all shrugged it off. in bewitched the real power is Darren. He reaches millions with his ad campaigns. that is real witch craft.
I love how O'Reilly chuckles every now and then thinking he's just "scored a point" without even realizing that he's making an absolute fool of himself.
@Scott Scotty Well I guess you could make the case that by virtue of Dawkins even engaging in conversation with O'Reilly he's brought himself down to O'Reillys level. Not a very strong case tho.
Fox "News" is such an absolute joke. They labeled Dawkins as simply an "atheist." Uh, hello!? He's an ethologist and evolutionary biologist with an MA and PhD from Oxford, and he's got a publication list longer than your arm. But sure, try to belittle him and talk over him because you definitely can't beat him in a fair debate.
lol so knowing facts and reality isn't intelligent but faith (believing in something without proof or evidence) is? Making up answers and having that belief without evidence is what is unintelligent, you can say that for any part of a person's life.
I feel so bad for dawkins. He must be so depressed when he is so brilliant and cares enough to try to spread his wisdom. Instead has to deal with so much of this shit.
Luke Ervin Atheists don't worship 'anyone', they merely believe that if you make fantastical claims for the existence of a supreme-being, skygod, omnipotent-creator.....you need to 'show' the evidence to back those fantastical claims. Btw, evidence as in 'empirical'. Not the inane offerings contained in a book of fiction (offence intended). :)
Drew Lawrence And why is the offence intended? What if a religion helps someone cope with terrible things that have happened? Why does someone having "an imaginary friend" bother you so much? Atheists claim that they can have great morals and not worship a god. So show it. Try being polite and understanding every once in a while. Its constant bigotry and finger pointing like this that I see from people. Dig deep, whether you have a god or not, you are human and will make mistakes, no doubt. Whether you have a god or not, we all have to live on this planet together and strive to thrive as a species. Whether you have a god or not, one day you will die, and like a a piece of music ingrained onto a vinyl record, your life can be played back by others living and listen or observe your life story. What will your music piece be? You being a morally strong and good person with or without a god who helped his fellow man thrive and push forward into this unknown? Or will your song be that of constant mockery and shaming others because they thought different than you. (7 billion plus people living on this rock, that is bound to happen.)
zigzack54 The 'offence' from religious apologist is to silence critical-thinking and rational thought, to remove democracy. “Violent, irrational, intolerant, allied to racism and tribalism and bigotry, invested in ignorance and hostile to free inquiry, contemptuous of women and coercive toward children: organized religion ought to have a great deal on its conscience.” - Hitchens C. Where religion has a vested political intent, theocratic based nations like Saudi Arabia for example, we see exactly the kind of country that Hitchens alludes to so well in the above quote...... If anyone takes or claims the moral high-ground merely because they claim 'divine-authority', they are 'inhumane', they shift the onus of responsibility. The doctrine of 'theocracy' is nothing more than a dictatorship, one where the dictator can never be held to account because of his 'divinity'.
Drew Lawrence Take a step back to see that Atheism has agenda just as any religion does. Atheism is not a religion but its still a way of thinking. Its still a mindset. Humanity can not escape mentality. All people will think and there being a variable of 7 billion plus people, there will be different mentalities. I just hope you were able to agree on something from my earlier comment. I want to get a long with you. I want to be a good neighbor to you. I will not judge you. This statement apply to anyone. Just please take note its hard for people to do that when you make fun of them or the way they think.
I am Protestant not Roman Catholic. I felt O'Reilly was acting a little arrogant. However, there is nothing more unscientific than naturalism/atheism. O'Reilly is right that you cannot account for origin. Nor can you produce any observable evidence of Darwinian evolution. You can, however, observe the historical gospel manuscripts of Christ. There are numerous non-biblical accounts documenting His crucifixion and resurrection. I choose to believe, based on evidence, that Jesus was God in flesh. He lived a perfect life and absorbed the wrath of God the Father so that our sins could be forgiven. If you are humble, repent of your sin, and put your trust in Christ's atoning sacrifice, you will be saved.
@@bl1760 because there’s more evidence for evolution than there is for gravity. And unless you’re a flat earther as well I assume you think gravity is real?
@@kaiza6467 You think everything in existence came from nothing? You stand in opposition to some of the greatest minds in science (Einstein, Newton, etc). There is no observable evidence for a change of kinds. Clearly animals adapt to their environments. However, birds are ALWAYS birds, cats are always cats and people are always people. Are you looking at the facts? Or are you just listening to your public education indoctrination?
"You guys can't explain everything, so I'm going with a bronze age book that says it's all done by an invisible magic wizard whose plan was screwed by a talking snake convincing a woman made from a rib to eat an echanted fruit"
@@SKRooU2 I understand perfectly well that believers want to rebrand bible stories as "symbolism" when they are revealed to be nonsense. And of course O'Reilly wouldn;t call those stories symbolic. Like 40% of Americans, he believes them in a literal sense.
@@richardgregory3684 you don't understand anything. If you did you would value your soul and seek of the gift of eternal life so you don't wind up in the lake of fire. Your conscious rejection of your Creator will land you in hell.
When Bill spoke, Richard was silent to let him speak until he is finished. That's respect, that's class. When Bill asked Richard to speak, he spoke but Bill kept interrupting him and dismissing everything he said before he's even finished. Offensive defensive tactic. Highly insecured bully. Richard: In the beginning scientists had to be humble because... Bill: That's a Christian virtue Me: Why aren't you following that virtue then Bill, if you so believe in your god?
Ryan Privee Wrong. It's an O'Reilly tactic. Not every host does it, even on your precious Faux News. O'Reilly forces his opinion on everyone, cuts everyone off. Even people he agrees with. Oh, and he sexually harasses women. So there's that...
This is classic Bill. Call an educated rational person who doesn't agree with you, then let him talk 20% of the time and you yourself spend 80% of the time on the B.S. that you think is right.
There is not only a profound intellectual imbalance between these two men, but also a remarkable exhibition of belief without questioning or thoughtfulness.
@@eliwalker6245 I feel so bad for you. It's all a complete fantasy for which there is not a single shred of evidence. Even if there was a God (although nothing indicates that there is), if that God was so narcissistic and insane that the only way to NOT go to Hell was to abandon reason and logic to pick the correct faith out of a hat containing hundreds of monotheistic religions that are all making the same claims, then that God can f*uck off, because that is just twisted and insane.
@@eliwalker6245 Fellowship of the Ring 12: 15 Behold! Gandalf so loved the world he gave his life fighting a Balrog. Two Towers 3:17 Gandalf the White has risin from the dead. Praise Gandalf. Eli, you sound equally silly quoting your story book.
@@mouthofspaghetti7817 The lord of the rings was created by j.r.r tolkein. You are going to tell me that you were created by nothing?, that our universe was created by nothing?. You and it were created by THE ONE TRUE GOD in heaven. 1 John 5:7 King James Version 7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. John 1:3 King James Version 3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. Time is running out. God loves you so very very much. God bless:)
I would want to debate dummies every day. I think its awesome what he is doing! And every interview he strikes them with so simple arguments they all just melt there in their stupid minds who oppose science. I wished tho he would've brought up if the interviewer believed that the God of bible was moral because he supported misogyny, slavery, incest etc and Genesis of creation and questioned him actually believing in that world is less than 10 000 years old.
The problem is, O'Reilly will go home after this interview thinking he won and that his beliefs were validated when in reality Dawkins exposed how absurd his beliefs are and how unrealistic his world view is.
O'Reilly doesn't believe in shit. The guy is a full blown narcissist and psychopath. He's pretending to be what you're seeing and hearing. The guy doesn't go home and think he's right for his beliefs. He goes home and hopes he's fooled you for how he wants you to view him which is a bullshit smoke screen cover up for his mental problems.
@@ComedyPal667 You ever see that clip where he freaks out over the teleprompter when Sting is going to be on, he completely freaks out, then whenhe's live he's suddenly incredibly calm. It is cold and honestly frightening, and he seems very much like a literal psychopath in it.
Why do a lot of people hate Richard Dawkins, and say that he is arrogant and aggressive? I don't understand. EVERY book I've read of his and EVERY interview I've seen of him he seems extremely logical and very respectful and soft spoken. what is arrogant and aggressive about that? please share opinions.
but those are some really complicated words and expressions for such a simple man, better for him to keep it as simple as possible. I mean, "for God's sake", he was already struggling with the words atheism and agnosticism, lol I don't even wanna imagine how the average viewer of his show looks like xD
@@Enshk you must be one of the regular viewers of O'Reilly show since you can't even spell. why don't you go back to school and educate yourself on reality
@Richard Fartbrother Most of the Foundational Scientists that really STARTED THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD and set mankind on a path of Scientific enlightenment were Christians. Even one of the pair of WATSON and CRICK that elucidated the DNA structure of Modern life became a Christian after discovery how the BASIS for all LIFE CONTAINS EXTREME INTELLIGENT DESIGN!! Even simple Bacteria, have been recently understood as being extremely COMPLEX. Look up the high speed ROTOR SYSTEM bacteria use to drive the whip like Flaggelum to move....
unrelated to your comment I just wanted to get this out there the NAZIs had God with us inscribed on their boots and their helmets, their moral depravity had nothing to do with their lack of belief in Yahweh, or for that matter any other sky daddy.
Clark Wilmerding No. The complete moral depravity of all people has nothing to do with their professed belief. All people are depraved. If you want to go to extremes, however, atheist communists killed more people, and they were not explicitly and directly contradicting their professed beliefs, as atheism and materialism have nothing objective or meaningful to comment on morality beyond subjective statements lacking any authority.
Clark Wilmerding I mean that in a purely natural world, every single statement of morality is subjective, relative, and not binding. (i.e. everything is permissible)
@@miguelbarahona6636 It's true though -that didn't make them mass murderers, just like their religious beliefs and opinions didn't make them what the were either. It's not that black and white, people are much more complex than that.
@@SStupendous no, some of their beliefs and opinions certainly made them do what they did, but is it something to do with them being religious or atheist, or more likely, that, for example, Stalin was just a radical disciple of Lenin, who claimed about necessety of terroristic dictatorship of his so called _bolshevism_ (and Stalins personality after all those years fighting emperor police was of paranoidal, he was greedy for power... maybe he was even psycopath, who knows...). Why consider only one part of someones belief system and not to investigate other possibilities...
@@rinat1985 Being a mindless, lacking-critical-thinking follower is not good. Being a follower isn't. When people blur the lines, everything from Stalin to Al Qaeda happens. I agree.
This “Interview” is actually just a platform for the closed-minded interviewer to espouse his own unprovable and ridiculous beliefs, while rudely interrupting and speaking over an erudite and intelligent interviewee.
exactly that is what i just said previously - he has zero interest in what Dawkins is saying. Actually doesn't even want to him to say anything. All of this while sexually molesting his co-workers of which jesus approved!
Welcome to fox. Funny thing was O'Reilly didn't believe any of the shite he was spouting. If he did he would never have broken the 10 commandments of his religion. Optics over substance......
He doesn't have to prove them. If you are in need of proof of God, then you don't understand Christianity. The apostles knew that faith was something subjective in its foundation but objective in its effect on the lives of people. Read some Kierkegaard to understand how Christianity actually works.
You do have to give O'Reilly credit. He maunevered around Dawkins well enough to not let him get much out, and what he could say was drowned out pretty quick. I think its this kind of thing that made Dawkins so bitter now.
That was rather bad of Bill. I wished he let Dawkins talk and let Dawkins just show what a F00L he loves to be. Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing." Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God. God is the reason for us and all we have. ruclips.net/video/JiMqzN_YSXU/видео.html “However improbable the origin of life might be, we know it happened on Earth because we are here.” -Richard Dawkins. We only get life from life...the law of biogenesis. We can't get anything without God. The odds are NOT there. ruclips.net/video/W1_KEVaCyaA/видео.html ruclips.net/video/yW9gawzZLsk/видео.html ruclips.net/video/ddaqSutt5aw/видео.html No, the eye did not evolve into various eyes. Your mere chance mutations are absurd. ruclips.net/video/X7h2HWcTwa4/видео.html Even Dawkins admits we can't know what is true because of natural selection... The God Delusion, “Since we are creatures of natural selection, we cannot totally trust our senses. Evolution only passes on traits that help a species survive, and not with preserving traits that tell a species what is actually true about life.” Oh, but Dawkins knows what's true about life...killing those who don't meet his expectations for living. dailycaller.com/2021/05/19/richard-dawkins-down-syndrome-roe-v-wade/
@@2fast2block So you are an idiot. Of course science is always right (to the extent we understand it). God is for weak minded animals that can't handle the pressure of existance without having a "blanky"....
The silly thing about creationists is that they always demand more proof of everything related to science, while believing in a magic God without question.
This video is the best example of the quotes "Arguing with an intelligent person is difficult but arguing with a stupid person is impossible" and also "First they'll bring you down to their level then beat you with experience"
Jesus Christ is the only way to heaven. Jesus Christ Loves you so much. Hell is real. You can have eternal life through The Lord Jesus Christ, please read the verses below. God Bless:). 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 King James Version 15 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; 2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. 3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; 4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: Ephesians 1:13 King James Version 13 In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise, God Bless:) It's eternity, you want to spend it in heaven not hell. Please read the book of John, and ask God for understanding and He will show you. Please look into it. The evidence is all there. Also look up Lee Strobel " Case for Christ" God Bless:)
I really wish Dawkins prepared himself for this debate. He should of done some research into what kind of a person Billy is. It did seem he was thrown off by the stupidity of Billy.
boomstick900 There is only one truth and it's not science. Evolution is wrong and is the work of satan. If you want true salvation then you must submit to our creator and lord Jason Genova and his messenger *sweet prince Andrew (gains be upon him)* for more info look up the *delray misfits*
@@rs72098 Hardly, but when Matt Dillahunty does interrupt somebody, it's because they've egregiously misinterpreted something and he tries to correct them before they continue. The difference between Dillahunty and O'Reilly however is that Matt is an educator, whereas Bill's a sensationalist TV host who never knows what he's talking about. One of those is a big red flag. I'll let you guess which one.
He also doesn't listen to what Dawkins is saying, and try to evaluate it. He just keeps spouting what he believes, with no regard to the arguments against it.
That’s not a problem. It’s a strategy people use when they’re losing a debate in an attempt to seem like they’re winning. Sometimes the other side gets flustered and the strategy actually works. In this case Dawkins maintained his composure and responded with logic making Bill look like the fool that he is
@@jaseimmitchell1145 i wish you were wrong, but so many of the right wing christians truly believe we all came from the same 2 people. I also think we need to point out which part of christianity because republican jesus doesnt turn the other cheeck, he reloads
Marius, have Dawkins go to the hospital and have the doctors do nothing, "literally nothing." Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing." Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God.
The difference in intellect between these two is mindblowing. O'Reilly down't even possess the mind to comprehend Richard's points. This discussion is just useless. It's like debating a bowl of flowers.
Bill OReilly is a skillful debater. He took an attacking position first and did not acknowledge the validity of many of Dawkins' statements. Instead, he immediately capitalizes on Dawkins' comment and incorporates some of the content as part of his own view, even if indirectly. Bill OReilly is very definitely intelligent and does understand Dawkins' points very well. Atheism requires a greater degree of courage for believers of religion to face the implicit bonds between the words of doctrine and their underlying fears of what life and death will be like without faith as a habit. For whatever reason, OReilly does not admit to a sufficient degree of doubt which supports a transition to the frankest view of nature which is scientific. The faith response can be called laziness at a superficial level of assessment but there is a deeper personal emotional challenge to take a meta view of what psychological training we mostly receive in our youth and cultural upbringing. Atheists/agnostics too owe to themselves to have a clear ability to express their view of nature and the cosmos. A commitment to a scientific view does not obliterate our social humanity.
@@honingbijtje83 I'll admit I was leaning towards Trump's side until he started pandering to christians. I don't quite agree with all of Biden's plans but I sure as hell would like to see what he'll do. I hope to see secularism pushed more by his administration but we shall see.
He was a bullying asshole. And now he's irrelevant. Just like Tucker and Megyn. All of them worthless and replaceable with younger bullshit bobbleheads.
I forgot how infuriating Bill O'Reilly was. Fox news has always been a right wing sewer but just watching this clip from years ago is making my blood boil all over again
@@feliperamedeirosI used to be on the left but you guys have pushed reason, logic, science, fact and truth so far out of the picture, you’re the biggest hypocrites on the planet, all the politicians on the left are dirtier than anyone on the right, you guys are on this crazy witch hunt for the man with orange skin. Banana republic, prosecute your political adversary tactics, you’ve got a senile, bumbling, babbling grandpa who can’t find his way out of as wet paper bag running the country wrapped up in corruption, can’t string a coherent sentence together…The left has become so foul and disgusting and the woke bs is getting so out of control, you’re shoving moderate people over to the other side every second and you’re so righteous and dishonest that it’s hilarious to me that you’d shame someone for being far right. People like you are creating and emboldening the far right, can you truly not see that? Nope, you can’t because you’re full of shit and u Rikki g yo look at your side with honest eyes and you’re all fervently looking for the destruction of the constitution and the country.
The sheer tone is enough to distinguish who's more humble and educated. Richard waits patiently until this idiot have stop talking. And on that, when you have someone on for an interview, you let them talk. This is the other way around. He's just constantly talking over Richard, his guest, in fear that Richard might find the opportunity to absolutely humiliate him on national TV, which Dawkins would not have even consider.
Richard is educated to you and you are as empty as he is. Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing." Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God.
Richard is a bully in most debates. He's also dismissive of any philosophical viewpoint incompatible with his. There's a reason why academic philosophers don't take him seriously.
Go join Dawkins so you both could have your stooo-pid party. Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing." Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God. God is the reason for us and all we have. ruclips.net/video/JiMqzN_YSXU/видео.html “However improbable the origin of life might be, we know it happened on Earth because we are here.” -Richard Dawkins. We only get life from life...the law of biogenesis. We can't get anything without God. The odds are NOT there. ruclips.net/video/W1_KEVaCyaA/видео.html ruclips.net/video/yW9gawzZLsk/видео.html ruclips.net/video/ddaqSutt5aw/видео.html No, the eye did not evolve into various eyes. Your mere chance mutations are absurd. ruclips.net/video/X7h2HWcTwa4/видео.html Even Dawkins admits we can't know what is true because of natural selection... The God Delusion, “Since we are creatures of natural selection, we cannot totally trust our senses. Evolution only passes on traits that help a species survive, and not with preserving traits that tell a species what is actually true about life.” Oh, but Dawkins knows what's true about life...killing those who don't meet his expectations for living. dailycaller.com/2021/05/19/richard-dawkins-down-syndrome-roe-v-wade/
Dawkins bringing up Apollo was the stupid part. Polytheism is illogical and therefore no Christian apologist would ever entertain the thought of multiple God's. We defend the idea of one creator of the universe, not fucking greek gods for fucks sake. Dawkins is straw manning and Bill decides not to take the bait by saying something silly.
@@jb111082 Jesus Christ is the only way to heaven. Jesus Christ Loves you so much. Hell is real. You can have eternal life through The Lord Jesus Christ, please read the verses below. God Bless:). 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 King James Version 15 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; 2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. 3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; 4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: Ephesians 1:13 King James Version 13 In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise,
Jesus Christ is the only way to heaven. Jesus Christ Loves you so much. Hell is real. You can have eternal life through The Lord Jesus Christ, please read the verses below. God Bless:). 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 King James Version 15 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; 2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. 3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; 4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: Ephesians 1:13 King James Version 13 In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise,
Jesus Christ is the only way to heaven. Jesus Christ Loves you so much. Hell is real. You can have eternal life through The Lord Jesus Christ, please read the verses below. God Bless:). 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 King James Version 15 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; 2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. 3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; 4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: Ephesians 1:13 King James Version 13 In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise, God Bless:) It's eternity, you want to spend it in heaven not hell. Please read the book of John, and ask God for understanding and He will show you. Please look into it. The evidence is all there. Also look up Lee Strobel " Case for Christ" God Bless:)
genius mchaggis I'm scared to know there are that many idiots out there who actually watch his show. Besides the people who want to watch him to make fun of his stupidity.
I think he used the phrase wrong. My understand the use of that phrase is in reference to one's own experience. An emotion someone has is their truth because no one else can verify it but that doesn't mean it's not true if that makes sense
@@FrensKafka was gonna say pretty much the same thing. When it comes to unprovable things then their can be some subjectivism to what people can justifiably call “the truth”. It basically means “my belief” or “what I consider to be the truth”.
There are spiritual truths. It's not all 1s and zeroes. It's like when your Dad says he is going to take you fishing and then dies in a car wreck on the way back from the whore house. The kids spiritual truth is that you still believe your Dad was going to take you fishing and it was going to be a good day.
@@zgarrett14 spiritual beliefs? Yeah, I corrected that mistake you made. Lol. Smh, imagine diluting the meaning of truth, which SHOULD and MUST be universal, with individual creed. Bro.
Dawkins only lasted by goofs like you. Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing." Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God. God is the reason for us and all we have. ruclips.net/video/JiMqzN_YSXU/видео.html “However improbable the origin of life might be, we know it happened on Earth because we are here.” -Richard Dawkins. We only get life from life...the law of biogenesis. We can't get anything without God. The odds are NOT there. ruclips.net/video/W1_KEVaCyaA/видео.html ruclips.net/video/yW9gawzZLsk/видео.html ruclips.net/video/ddaqSutt5aw/видео.html No, the eye did not evolve into various eyes. Your mere chance mutations are absurd. ruclips.net/video/X7h2HWcTwa4/видео.html Even Dawkins admits we can't know what is true because of natural selection... The God Delusion, “Since we are creatures of natural selection, we cannot totally trust our senses. Evolution only passes on traits that help a species survive, and not with preserving traits that tell a species what is actually true about life.” Oh, but Dawkins knows what's true about life...killing those who don't meet his expectations for living. dailycaller.com/2021/05/19/richard-dawkins-down-syndrome-roe-v-wade/
He's a talking head that only has to read the talking points and play the agenda of his puppet masters. Intelligence, charisma, respect for honest journalism, etc. aren't necessary in the world of political propaganda.
He didn't waste a second with the O'Reilly buffoon. What he did was to SHOW their "discussion" to the fox news audience, among whom a small fraction will realize that these atheists guys seem in fact to know more and to be nicer than what their preacher told them... I respect that.
Joey: But … you didn't prove that vanilla's the best. Nick: I didn't have to. I proved that you're wrong, and if you're wrong, I'm right. Joey: But you still didn't convince me. Nick: Because I'm not after you. I'm after them. - Thank You For Smoking.
Ya, I think he's wasting all of our time by his stupid ideas. Oh, and he's making a lot of money by writing books...... but of course that's all for the betterment of humanity... he's a true angel at heart.....
Hmmm... Is it? There may or may not be a God, but look where it got us - the philosophy, the morals... Religion is necessary... And be careful, more people denying God is something most theists regards as prophecy.
@@Kairi091 I said religion is necessary... I did not even hint I meant one in particular. If I said politics and education poisons our brains, it would be untrue. Religion does not poison us on its own. These three things, among others, are only dangerous when mixed with ignorance and the ugliness of human nature. If you wish to demonstrate how religion is poisonous, please do so.
You're a dolt so go pretend to be smart with your fellow nitwit Dawkins. Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing." Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God. God is the reason for us and all we have. ruclips.net/video/JiMqzN_YSXU/видео.html “However improbable the origin of life might be, we know it happened on Earth because we are here.” -Richard Dawkins. We only get life from life...the law of biogenesis. We can't get anything without God. The odds are NOT there. ruclips.net/video/W1_KEVaCyaA/видео.html ruclips.net/video/yW9gawzZLsk/видео.html ruclips.net/video/ddaqSutt5aw/видео.html No, the eye did not evolve into various eyes. Your mere chance mutations are absurd. ruclips.net/video/X7h2HWcTwa4/видео.html Even Dawkins admits we can't know what is true because of natural selection... The God Delusion, “Since we are creatures of natural selection, we cannot totally trust our senses. Evolution only passes on traits that help a species survive, and not with preserving traits that tell a species what is actually true about life.” Oh, but Dawkins knows what's true about life...killing those who don't meet his expectations for living. dailycaller.com/2021/05/19/richard-dawkins-down-syndrome-roe-v-wade/
too bad he's not dead yet, i will happily rejoice that day like with dianne feinstein just now lol! also gays still get executed in islam countries, why not save them my brave atheist?
As Beorge Carlin said : “Think of how stupid the average person is. Then realise that half the people are even more stupid than that.” Guess which half 0’ Reilly is in.
@@stesj4 , within the context of the conversation he makes it clear he understands that the tides are influenced by the moon. What he's referring to is the extreme fine tuning that makes life possible and which permits our planet able to sustain life in the first place, that's what he's referring to when he says that the best theory physicists can come up with us the "Big Bang" - there was nothing, now there is something. But how did the earth come to be so exact as to be able to sustain life, in what looks to be an otherwise barren and lifeless solar system.
“Where is faith in all of this? Is it Dawkins…” No, Dawkins is not putting faith into science, science is a process used to explain phenomena in the natural world. It uses evidence and observations to substantiate what is “true”. O’Reilly is not not looking for what is true, he “throws his hat in” with Catholics because science doesn’t have every question answered. The problem is it does have far more questions answered and and is far more representative of the natural world than any religion is and by not accepting this you are ignoring the reality in which you exist. Does ignoring reality in favour of a hypothetical god seem reasonable? You wish to forgo religion, but still believe in a “creator” that’s fine, but why? Is just because, much like O’Reilly, science has not laid out everything, explained everything so you need to fill this gap with a god? Why is that? Will this gap keep shrinking as more information come available? How do you reconcile this? You are insisting to yourself and expressing to others that because there are no answers at this time, you must delude yourself into accepting a premise with no evidentiary basis as true and real, does this sound rational to you?
Well they don't want to credit Dawkins as a PhD, Evolutionary Biology, Professor, or any other title, as they don't want to give their audience the impression that he's actually an achieved intelectual and proper expert in a scientific field, as that doesn't fit with the Christian propaganda that atheists are just stupid and hateful people who hate God.
@@AbsenceOfLogic Anyone with a functioning brain understands that Bill O'Reilly is a fool of the biggest caliber. If it was customary in his religion to get wards & charms to drive off evil spirits, then he'd be the first guy in the line to buy them. He'd be that gullible. When I was young my parents bought all kinds of science magazines for our family. They included various topics, random topics and one even might have contained an explanation for the tides. Of course I've long taken it for granted that the Moon actually has a great effect on the tidal forces in our seas, but well.. would Billy care about that?
@@TheRealDebussyFarts Provide me a timeline please. We talking 3600BC, did he create all the other Gods? Also, why would he? He is infinite, he can not need anything. Did he create all Gods?
Dawkins is a joke. Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing." Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God.
he sounds like someone who is quite aware they're wrong but is too afraid to face it because they've shaped their life around bullshit and the idea of transitioning towards a non retarded perception is too uncomfortable for them.
I'm on your side, buddy. One of the most childish quotes from Bill was "Okay, I don't care about the constitution. The constitution isn't here. You're here. Don't be a pinhead!" back in a 2009 interview.
Yeah O'reilly was throwing out generalizations, broad ones. And Dawkins was going so far over O'Reillys head that he didn't even really realize it all that much.
Dawkins's patience and humility is remarkable lol. He goes on these shows despite knowing that the ignorant hosts will not actually interview him fairly or allow him to speak equally.
John 1 King James Version 1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. God loves you so much that He sent His only begotten Son to die on the cross to pay for your sins. If you believe and put your trust in Jesus Christ, that He died on the cross to pay your sin debt and that He rose again on the third day, you will be saved. once you are saved, you will not die in your sins and be damned to hell for eternity. God will remove your sins and your soul will be washed clean with the blood that Jesus Christ shed for us on the cross. your own good works will not get you into heaven. Jesus Christ did all of the work for you, all you have to do is believe and put your trust in Him and He will save you. Ephesians 1:13 King James Version 13 In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise,. Jesus Christ is coming back very soon and we all have to be ready. I pray in Jesus Christ's mighty name that you be saved. :)
2002hur That we already have a boatload of. String theory, M-theory, multiverse, inflation... take your pick of of excuse theories. Problem is, if my book is wrong it doesn't matter to me. I'll just be dead. What if your fairy tales are wrong?
Colin O'Brien the magick book predicted that the universe is expanding, it also predicted germs, and that the earth was spherical while the popular belief was that it was flat.....lol and it has answers to who created everything when the athiests and the agnostics still have been unable to answer..not to mention the foretelling of prophecy after prophecy...hmmm I think I'll go with the magick book on this one;) lol
By Fox News standards, he's practically Isaac Newton. The only point where I really wanted to punch the face on my computer screen was when he said "you don't know how we got here." That always infuriates me. There's nothing WRONG with admitting you don't know! "I don't know" is the beginning of all scientific enquiry. Religious people don't know either, they just plug the gap with a god and that conveniently answers everything. How lazy!
***** thats not really as tangential as it'd appear. he takes his conclusion against religion directly based on his knowledge of biology (along with other subjects), so including his trained profession is actually relevant on the matter.
Funny thing is, Dawkins, in character, act and personality is far more like a Christian rolemodel than O'Reilly. If Jesus looked at both of them at the heart and from their actions, ironically Dawkins is a much better Christian and human being than he is, and many Christians for that matter.
Jesus Christ is the only way to heaven. Jesus Christ Loves you so much. Hell is real. You can have eternal life through The Lord Jesus Christ, please read the verses below. God Bless:). 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 King James Version 15 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; 2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. 3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; 4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: Ephesians 1:13 King James Version 13 In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise, God Bless:)
@@SStupendous Jesus Christ is the only way to heaven. Jesus Christ Loves you so much. Hell is real. You can have eternal life through The Lord Jesus Christ, please read the verses below. God Bless:). 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 King James Version 15 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; 2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. 3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; 4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: Ephesians 1:13 King James Version 13 In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise, God Bless:)
"I just don't think we could have lucked out to have .... the sun goes up, the sun goes down" - 😂😂😂😂 does he really not get this incredibly simple concept? 🤦♂️
Bill Oreilly with the typical reasons for belief, those being: 1. God of the Gaps 2. Fallacy of passing the Buck Edit this in -- Adolf Hitler = “I am now as before a Catholic and will always remain so.” - (“Adolf Hitler” - John Toland [Pulitzer Prize winner] New York: Anchor Publishing, 1992, p.507) So Oreilly ... Wrong Again.
Yeah; he was forced into it by how extremely civilised Dawkins himself is. Unfortunately the fact that O'Reilly was still an insufferable, arrogant, disrespectful, ignorant bully in this interview shows how bad he is the rest of the time.
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
![Путин и ПЕСКОВ ждут звонка от ТРАМПА 😁 [Пародия]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/sm8iV0SxRHk/mqdefault.jpg)
The intelligence gap between these two men is almost comical.
"almost"
It is comical
Chris shoop the difference of I.Q is about as much as how many likes are on this comment!
Yeah, the best part is "We're working on that" :P No argument at all
EVProductionBeats only the scientific method. He says that as he is not so arrogant as to assume he knows everything, which in a sense is what you have to do to take a leap of faith and be religious
I imagine Bill walking away from this argument thinking he totally won.
he did
I imagine Bill walking away from this and licking the nearest window.
When you don't know how much you don't know, you think you know everything you need to know.
@@TonyEnglandUK he probably did that too
They call it the Dunning and Kruger effect.
"Being humble is a Christian virtue." He says smugly.
+Dan Coleman-Goss "Of course it is." Dawkins replied sarcastically.
+League Sucks Ja, und? Dawkins weist keinen Widerspruch in seinen Aussagen und Haltungen auf. „Of course it is“=Selbstverständlichkeit und Sarkasmus stehen in keinem Widerspruch. Bill O'Reilly sollte mal aufhören dem Christlichen Glauben einen abscheulichen und erbärmlichen Ruf zu geben.
Dan Coleman-Goss ask the vatican if grey belive in God,, it's called control and the old mighty dollar is the son bunch of crooks
This is the funniest part ever, lol. He said like he is too blind to see how humanity works
Yeah, in a world in which Greek philosophy never existed...
What a masterclass in interviewing technique. You know you're a world class interviewer when you don't let your guest speak for more than 2 seconds.
He said it is a virtue so he must look up to humble people.
Hahaha. Same with Laura Ingram and Christopher Hitchens and his masterful Hitchslap, after she would just wouldn’t let him speak : “we haven’t got more time but please come again” -“I’d love to come again to your programme so I can hear what you think.”
He wasn't there to let his guest speak. He just wanted to keep babbling on like a fool that he is.
@@aimedon Exactly
No this actually is a masterclass in interviewing people.
You're supposed to make a message stick around in the heads of dumb monkeys, and "when you get an answer maybe I'll listen" is far more memorable than whatever detailed explanation Dawkins was giving, even though Dawkins is *obviously* right.
"Being humble is a Christian virtue"
The jokes write themselves holy shit
Yes especially since only science will try to debunk its own established theories.
@@golternator333 well duh? but what does that have to do with the golden comedy above?
@@gabrielegenota1480 flew right overhead, no self awareness
@@gabrielegenota1480 religion will almost never reasses their beliefs, in a way making it the most non-humble entity of world belief. Science's backbone is built on thinking something, finding out it's wrong and humbly going back to fix it or trying to find an answer, in essence- the most humble of studies.
@@golternator333 Are you resentful of science?
“They both had mustaches as well. That’s not the reason they killed people”. Brilliant quote
I love the good old day when bad guys had evil mustaches..
@@cradleofanal It may have been the mustaches after all. Lol
And then he gets a strawman thrown in his face LOL
As top gear one said "they are unable to concentrate under the influence...of a mustache."
@@carpballet osama went beard lul
"being humble is a Christian virtue"
Claiming that your religion invented humility isn't humble.
@@brandonsmith9098 if he's like most Christians I've talked to about morality he probably thinks Christians invented it, that's definitely the vibe he was putting out.
Being humble applies to all religions and beliefs....not only to Christians...
I’ve met a lot of christians who think the “golden rule” came from Jesus too
Claiming that your God created EVERYTHING isn't humble either lmao
@@brandonsmith9098 no but phrasing it as a "Christian virtue" implies that it started in Christianity. "a virtue embraced by Christianity" would be more precise
"Tide goes in, tide goes out... you can't explain that" - Bill O'Reilly
he was saying why do we have so much water on the planet? the moon also controls it. without that moon, you would be dead. vast waves would rotate round the world and wash away everything daily.
so immediately its very nice to have those two things? and one amino acid forming. Is 10^240 according to an atheist. Francis Crick. and you need two dozen different ones to make a bespoke protein. so that is fortunate. what do you do with one protein? nothing? it rots. you need millions of them.
God ends this shit in this year. you all get PROOF. the dead will educate you.
Bill O’Rielly: Also thinks the Coriolis Effect is witchcraft. 😂
@@estellesstories7467 witch craft is defined by MANIPULATION. in the old movie, double Indemnity, a woman convinces an insurance man, to kill her husband. She uses sex, and manipulates him to kill her husband, for the insurance. that is witch craft. to convince someone to do evil. To get what you want by a strategy. even children do it. they convince their parents to buy them sweets. if i do this? will you do this? politicians are using witch craft. advertisers are using witch craft. all the world does it.
buy a coke? Buy a car... here is why our car is better? they try to convince you.
i trained as a Graphic Designer, on day one of my University course, the Tutor said - we are trained liars. we embellish the truth, we airbrush out all the flaws. and stretch the models to be taller. we sell lies to the public. you should know this before you continue? and we all shrugged it off.
in bewitched the real power is Darren. He reaches millions with his ad campaigns. that is real witch craft.
Every night, god turns out the lights.
It's the equivalent of saying _"We don't yet know what's in that cave therefore it must contain a dragon."_
“Being humble is a Christian virtue”
Dude’s not humble throughout the entire interview 😂
Toxic narcissist
So I guess Buddhist and Hindus aren't humble.
Do you even call that an interview?! He answers his own questions and listens to his own self
Fucking cocky prick talks about being humble. The irony!
Christians have many virtues and practically practice none of them.
I love how O'Reilly chuckles every now and then thinking he's just "scored a point" without even realizing that he's making an absolute fool of himself.
Both of them are making fools of themselves and YOU have absolutely zero clue.
Exactly!
@@Han-Solo459 Tit.
@Scott Scotty Well I guess you could make the case that by virtue of Dawkins even engaging in conversation with O'Reilly he's brought himself down to O'Reillys level. Not a very strong case tho.
You just described conservatism.
Fox "News" is such an absolute joke. They labeled Dawkins as simply an "atheist." Uh, hello!? He's an ethologist and evolutionary biologist with an MA and PhD from Oxford, and he's got a publication list longer than your arm. But sure, try to belittle him and talk over him because you definitely can't beat him in a fair debate.
Nick Lindquist he doubts the eternal creator, despite being so ‘intelligent’ wat a joke
nicholas ian and what proof do you have for your "eternal creator"
lol so knowing facts and reality isn't intelligent but faith (believing in something without proof or evidence) is? Making up answers and having that belief without evidence is what is unintelligent, you can say that for any part of a person's life.
@@nic1615 I am your creator.
Europe will not remain so progressive if they keep importing Muslims, a religion that hates science even more than the christian nobodies in America
The moustache argument was hilarious. You can’t argue with people who confuse correlation and causaition. They JUST DON’T GET IT.
I feel so bad for dawkins. He must be so depressed when he is so brilliant and cares enough to try to spread his wisdom. Instead has to deal with so much of this shit.
Robby Coulter Basically any non-republican-religious guest fox has ever had probably feels the same way.
Luke Ervin Atheists don't worship 'anyone', they merely believe that if you make fantastical claims for the existence of a supreme-being, skygod, omnipotent-creator.....you need to 'show' the evidence to back those fantastical claims.
Btw, evidence as in 'empirical'. Not the inane offerings contained in a book of fiction (offence intended). :)
Drew Lawrence And why is the offence intended? What if a religion helps someone cope with terrible things that have happened? Why does someone having "an imaginary friend" bother you so much? Atheists claim that they can have great morals and not worship a god. So show it. Try being polite and understanding every once in a while. Its constant bigotry and finger pointing like this that I see from people. Dig deep, whether you have a god or not, you are human and will make mistakes, no doubt. Whether you have a god or not, we all have to live on this planet together and strive to thrive as a species. Whether you have a god or not, one day you will die, and like a a piece of music ingrained onto a vinyl record, your life can be played back by others living and listen or observe your life story. What will your music piece be? You being a morally strong and good person with or without a god who helped his fellow man thrive and push forward into this unknown? Or will your song be that of constant mockery and shaming others because they thought different than you. (7 billion plus people living on this rock, that is bound to happen.)
zigzack54
The 'offence' from religious apologist is to silence critical-thinking and rational thought, to remove democracy.
“Violent, irrational, intolerant, allied to racism and tribalism and bigotry, invested in ignorance and hostile to free inquiry, contemptuous of women and coercive toward children: organized religion ought to have a great deal on its conscience.”
- Hitchens C.
Where religion has a vested political intent, theocratic based nations like Saudi Arabia for example, we see exactly the kind of country that Hitchens alludes to so well in the above quote......
If anyone takes or claims the moral high-ground merely because they claim 'divine-authority', they are 'inhumane', they shift the onus of responsibility.
The doctrine of 'theocracy' is nothing more than a dictatorship, one where the dictator can never be held to account because of his 'divinity'.
Drew Lawrence Take a step back to see that Atheism has agenda just as any religion does. Atheism is not a religion but its still a way of thinking. Its still a mindset. Humanity can not escape mentality. All people will think and there being a variable of 7 billion plus people, there will be different mentalities. I just hope you were able to agree on something from my earlier comment. I want to get a long with you. I want to be a good neighbor to you. I will not judge you. This statement apply to anyone. Just please take note its hard for people to do that when you make fun of them or the way they think.
I'm in awe of Richard Dawkins' polite patience with stupidity
I am Protestant not Roman Catholic. I felt O'Reilly was acting a little arrogant. However, there is nothing more unscientific than naturalism/atheism.
O'Reilly is right that you cannot account for origin. Nor can you produce any observable evidence of Darwinian evolution. You can, however, observe the historical gospel manuscripts of Christ. There are numerous non-biblical accounts documenting His crucifixion and resurrection. I choose to believe, based on evidence, that Jesus was God in flesh. He lived a perfect life and absorbed the wrath of God the Father so that our sins could be forgiven. If you are humble, repent of your sin, and put your trust in Christ's atoning sacrifice, you will be saved.
@@bl1760 bullshit
@@bl1760 have you bothered to even look up the evidence supporting evolution or are you just repeating what your pastor told you?
@@bl1760 because there’s more evidence for evolution than there is for gravity.
And unless you’re a flat earther as well I assume you think gravity is real?
@@kaiza6467 You think everything in existence came from nothing? You stand in opposition to some of the greatest minds in science (Einstein, Newton, etc).
There is no observable evidence for a change of kinds. Clearly animals adapt to their environments. However, birds are ALWAYS birds, cats are always cats and people are always people. Are you looking at the facts? Or are you just listening to your public education indoctrination?
Richard Dawkins most likely got in his car saying “That’s 5 minutes of my life I’ll never get back.”
He barely got a word in lol
Richard Dawkins talks to himself while he's inside his car? What a bizarre thought.
That's what O'Reilly's ex wife used to say
@@eliwalker6245 The word of god is bird. Bird is the word, Buh buh buh bird bird bird, bird is the word.
@@eliwalker6245 Troll, cut and paste , cut and paste...You aren't even inspired enough by your beliefs to make original quotes. 🙄
"You guys can't explain everything, so I'm going with a bronze age book that says it's all done by an invisible magic wizard whose plan was screwed by a talking snake convincing a woman made from a rib to eat an echanted fruit"
🤣🤣
LMAO
you shouldn't talk about things you know nothing about. You obviously don't understand symbolism.
@@SKRooU2 I understand perfectly well that believers want to rebrand bible stories as "symbolism" when they are revealed to be nonsense. And of course O'Reilly wouldn;t call those stories symbolic. Like 40% of Americans, he believes them in a literal sense.
@@richardgregory3684 you don't understand anything. If you did you would value your soul and seek of the gift of eternal life so you don't wind up in the lake of fire. Your conscious rejection of your Creator will land you in hell.
When Bill spoke, Richard was silent to let him speak until he is finished. That's respect, that's class. When Bill asked Richard to speak, he spoke but Bill kept interrupting him and dismissing everything he said before he's even finished. Offensive defensive tactic. Highly insecured bully.
Richard: In the beginning scientists had to be humble because...
Bill: That's a Christian virtue
Me: Why aren't you following that virtue then Bill, if you so believe in your god?
Highly insecure bully, and blithering moron.
It's his show, all hosts do that including on your precious libtard shows
I LOVE Richards reply during that exchange. "Of course it is." And he just kind sneaks it in there xD
tubbie0075 unfortunately that's just Americans.
Ryan Privee Wrong. It's an O'Reilly tactic. Not every host does it, even on your precious Faux News. O'Reilly forces his opinion on everyone, cuts everyone off. Even people he agrees with. Oh, and he sexually harasses women. So there's that...
2:59 "Religion has been a bane, b-a-n-e..."
Say what you like about Bill, he spells four letter words with confidence 💪
Why the hell did he spell it? 😂😂😂
Give him a 5 letter word to spell and watch that confidence evaporate 😂
He assumes his audience can't spell it
The most mind blowing part of that is that I can’t tell what other spelling of bane he would be clarifying against
@@hypers829 he learned it recently
This is classic Bill. Call an educated rational person who doesn't agree with you, then let him talk 20% of the time and you yourself spend 80% of the time on the B.S. that you think is right.
those who know, do not speak. those who speak, do not know
The guy is basically interviewing himself.
Biggus Dickus exactly
I thought your profilepicture was a hair on my screen, lol
I have a chest cold. Thanks for the paroxysmal coughing your comment caused. I should be good for at least another hour non-wheezing.
There is not only a profound intellectual imbalance between these two men, but also a remarkable exhibition of belief without questioning or thoughtfulness.
I think if I were a Christian, I'd be begging other Christians to stop Bill O'Reilly promoting our cause.
o'Reilly is the poster boy of ignorant arrogance. A loudmouthed know-it-all who should go sit on his head.
I love how Richard Dawkins can't help but laugh at O'Reilly's childlike understanding of the world.
@@eliwalker6245 I feel so bad for you. It's all a complete fantasy for which there is not a single shred of evidence. Even if there was a God (although nothing indicates that there is), if that God was so narcissistic and insane that the only way to NOT go to Hell was to abandon reason and logic to pick the correct faith out of a hat containing hundreds of monotheistic religions that are all making the same claims, then that God can f*uck off, because that is just twisted and insane.
@@eliwalker6245 Fellowship of the Ring 12: 15 Behold! Gandalf so loved the world he gave his life fighting a Balrog.
Two Towers 3:17 Gandalf the White has risin from the dead. Praise Gandalf.
Eli, you sound equally silly quoting your story book.
@@mouthofspaghetti7817
The lord of the rings was created by j.r.r tolkein.
You are going to tell me that you were created by nothing?, that our universe was created by nothing?.
You and it were created by THE ONE TRUE GOD in heaven.
1 John 5:7
King James Version
7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
John 1:3
King James Version
3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
Time is running out.
God loves you so very very much.
God bless:)
@@eliwalker6245 Well at least you know who wrote the Lord of the Rings, the bible is mostly anonymous.
Yes it is funny to laugh at religious people
I don’t want to be Richard Dawkins. He goes through so many terrible experiences with dumb people.
I would want to debate dummies every day. I think its awesome what he is doing! And every interview he strikes them with so simple arguments they all just melt there in their stupid minds who oppose science. I wished tho he would've brought up if the interviewer believed that the God of bible was moral because he supported misogyny, slavery, incest etc and Genesis of creation and questioned him actually believing in that world is less than 10 000 years old.
On the contrary.... he sees comedy hour at fox every single day.
Well he’s got some dumb arguments such as everything came from nothing 😂
@@breadpitt5777 Well that’s not his argument. And you just proved this guys point completely.
@@breadpitt5777 yikes... drinking the fox koolaid much?
If Bill got his sexual morals from the Bible, I can only say I'm not surprised
That which is claimed without evidence,
can be dismissed without evidence.
ManchmalPfosten sounds like something CarlSagon would have said....
Hitchens's razor
U don’t have evidence proving he doesnt exist either
Everybody who responded to this must now give full credit and honor and respect my belief in Spider-Man. Prove he doesn't exist, heritics!
Dane Calderon people are discussing this rationally and u come and make those ridiculous childish arguments. Eh, what can I expect from an atheist
"tides come in tides go out" checkm8 atheists
MrCrespo583 Fucking Brilliant! ;)
Yes, we must pray to the force of gravity
I fucking love that video
Shit comes in and shit goes out. Brilliant, holy shit!
Conversation should have been over at the word “physiology.”
😀
Whatever . . . you're getting bogged down in a bit of trivial semantics and missing the point. (It's called "Making someone an offender for a word"
@@phav1832 Whatever...you're missing the point. It's called "someone having no idea what they are talking about" 🙄🤦♂️
@@phav1832 It's not even semantics tho, it's literally just the wrong word. That's like me saying "I don't know the immunology of a microwave".
@@phav1832 reply?
More than 16 years later it's still hilarious to hear how well Dawkins wiped the floor with O'Reilly!
The problem is, O'Reilly will go home after this interview thinking he won and that his beliefs were validated when in reality Dawkins exposed how absurd his beliefs are and how unrealistic his world view is.
O'Reilly doesn't believe in shit. The guy is a full blown narcissist and psychopath. He's pretending to be what you're seeing and hearing. The guy doesn't go home and think he's right for his beliefs. He goes home and hopes he's fooled you for how he wants you to view him which is a bullshit smoke screen cover up for his mental problems.
miloandot proof?
miloandot Probably true. Old Bill made a shit ton of money, wouldn't surprise one bit if it were all a ruse.
@@ComedyPal667 You ever see that clip where he freaks out over the teleprompter when Sting is going to be on, he completely freaks out, then whenhe's live he's suddenly incredibly calm. It is cold and honestly frightening, and he seems very much like a literal psychopath in it.
@@Mersault26 link
Why do a lot of people hate Richard Dawkins, and say that he is arrogant and aggressive? I don't understand. EVERY book I've read of his and EVERY interview I've seen of him he seems extremely logical and very respectful and soft spoken. what is arrogant and aggressive about that? please share opinions.
Luke Ervin Just like every scientist and non-believer was during the dark ages?
Luke Ervin There's only so much that someone can be oppressed before they start to lash out.
He never spews hate ever ... He is one of the greatest thinkers of this generation!
Shane McCoy
did anyone said he spewed hate? i'm not sure what you're referring to.
Re read it as a statement ... It's not referring to anything - just a thought.
"Atheist"
You could add professor, scientist, biologist, etc, you know?
He is really too stupid to understand the difference between all of these...
@@honingbijtje83 not just him most of the christians too
but those are some really complicated words and expressions for such a simple man, better for him to keep it as simple as possible.
I mean, "for God's sake", he was already struggling with the words atheism and agnosticism, lol
I don't even wanna imagine how the average viewer of his show looks like xD
@@Enshk you must be one of the regular viewers of O'Reilly show since you can't even spell. why don't you go back to school and educate yourself on reality
@Richard Fartbrother Most of the Foundational Scientists that really STARTED THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD and set mankind on a path of Scientific enlightenment were Christians. Even one of the pair of WATSON and CRICK that elucidated the DNA structure of Modern life became a Christian after discovery how the BASIS for all LIFE CONTAINS EXTREME INTELLIGENT DESIGN!!
Even simple Bacteria, have been recently understood as being extremely COMPLEX. Look up the high speed ROTOR SYSTEM bacteria use to drive the whip like Flaggelum to move....
‘We have a very good idea of why the tides come in and out…’ omg classic! 😂😂😂
This could 've been filmed yesterday. America has'nt changed.
"Akka, Bakka, Rakka, Dakka. Angelic reinforcement. Africa right now. Africa right now"
Pretty sure it's worse now.
@@stiltomonkey6137 it’s worse because we deny Jesus Christ as our Lord and Savior. Repent, and thou shalt be saved.
@@TheRealDebussyFarts I hope you are joking, because that's bullshit.
@@TheRealDebussyFarts did god stop all those idiots who kept going to church without masks or social distancing from getting corona virus?
1:55 "I'm throwing in with God" translates to "I'm too stupid/lazy to understand science"
LOL
unrelated to your comment I just wanted to get this out there the NAZIs had God with us inscribed on their boots and their helmets, their moral depravity had nothing to do with their lack of belief in Yahweh, or for that matter any other sky daddy.
Clark Wilmerding
No. The complete moral depravity of all people has nothing to do with their professed belief. All people are depraved. If you want to go to extremes, however, atheist communists killed more people, and they were not explicitly and directly contradicting their professed beliefs, as atheism and materialism have nothing objective or meaningful to comment on morality beyond subjective statements lacking any authority.
ClassyCactus what do you mean subjective statements lacking any authority
Clark Wilmerding
I mean that in a purely natural world, every single statement of morality is subjective, relative, and not binding. (i.e. everything is permissible)
"Hitler and Stalin both had mustache, but their mustaches didn't make them mass murderers" - you just gotta love Dawkins
Actually that was a pretty bad logicall argument by Dawkins.
@@miguelbarahona6636 It's true though -that didn't make them mass murderers, just like their religious beliefs and opinions didn't make them what the were either. It's not that black and white, people are much more complex than that.
@@SStupendous no, some of their beliefs and opinions certainly made them do what they did, but is it something to do with them being religious or atheist, or more likely, that, for example, Stalin was just a radical disciple of Lenin, who claimed about necessety of terroristic dictatorship of his so called _bolshevism_ (and Stalins personality after all those years fighting emperor police was of paranoidal, he was greedy for power... maybe he was even psycopath, who knows...). Why consider only one part of someones belief system and not to investigate other possibilities...
@@rinat1985 Being a mindless, lacking-critical-thinking follower is not good. Being a follower isn't. When people blur the lines, everything from Stalin to Al Qaeda happens. I agree.
Well Darwin made lots of assumptions off of appearances as well, most of them were faulty.
O'Reilly: "I don't understand it, so it must be magic"
Ironic
he never said that. Belief in God is not magic.
This “Interview” is actually just a platform for the closed-minded interviewer to espouse his own unprovable and ridiculous beliefs, while rudely interrupting and speaking over an erudite and intelligent interviewee.
exactly that is what i just said previously - he has zero interest in what Dawkins is saying. Actually doesn't even want to him to say anything. All of this while sexually molesting his co-workers of which jesus approved!
Welcome to fox.
Funny thing was O'Reilly didn't believe any of the shite he was spouting. If he did he would never have broken the 10 commandments of his religion.
Optics over substance......
He doesn't have to prove them. If you are in need of proof of God, then you don't understand Christianity. The apostles knew that faith was something subjective in its foundation but objective in its effect on the lives of people. Read some Kierkegaard to understand how Christianity actually works.
You do have to give O'Reilly credit. He maunevered around Dawkins well enough to not let him get much out, and what he could say was drowned out pretty quick. I think its this kind of thing that made Dawkins so bitter now.
@@donaldsalazar6030 Islam works exactly the same way. So does heroin.
When a 3 year old thinks he's winning the argument with an adult because he talks over him...
That was rather bad of Bill. I wished he let Dawkins talk and let Dawkins just show what a F00L he loves to be.
Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing."
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God.
God is the reason for us and all we have.
ruclips.net/video/JiMqzN_YSXU/видео.html
“However improbable the origin of life might be, we know it happened on Earth because we are here.” -Richard Dawkins.
We only get life from life...the law of biogenesis. We can't get anything without God.
The odds are NOT there.
ruclips.net/video/W1_KEVaCyaA/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/yW9gawzZLsk/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/ddaqSutt5aw/видео.html
No, the eye did not evolve into various eyes. Your mere chance mutations are absurd.
ruclips.net/video/X7h2HWcTwa4/видео.html
Even Dawkins admits we can't know what is true because of natural selection...
The God Delusion, “Since we are creatures of natural selection, we cannot totally trust our senses. Evolution only passes on traits that help a species survive, and not with preserving traits that tell a species what is actually true about life.”
Oh, but Dawkins knows what's true about life...killing those who don't meet his expectations for living.
dailycaller.com/2021/05/19/richard-dawkins-down-syndrome-roe-v-wade/
@@2fast2block So you are an idiot. Of course science is always right (to the extent we understand it). God is for weak minded animals that can't handle the pressure of existance without having a "blanky"....
"I saw Apollo, man. He was down there...he's not looking good" ....so cringeworthy!
Mans literally had no argument that he had to deflect.
And he does it as naturally as breathing.
@@gabrielegenota1480 and yet alot of people think he won because he talked more and interrupted more. Our biology gets in our way sometimes.
An absolutely stupid and pathetic rebuttal. I'm surprised the entire studio crew didn't audibly groan.
@@calebwilliams586 People who think more words in = smart are dumb.
That’s what turns me off about Oreilly-those irrelevant asides. And his ‘humility’ argument-cringeworthy. Why he goes for the pathetic is beyond me.
The silly thing about creationists is that they always demand more proof of everything related to science, while believing in a magic God without question.
This video is the best example of the quotes
"Arguing with an intelligent person is difficult but arguing with a stupid person is impossible" and also
"First they'll bring you down to their level then beat you with experience"
Like playing chess with a pidgon.
Jesus Christ is the only way to heaven. Jesus Christ Loves you so much.
Hell is real.
You can have eternal life through The Lord Jesus Christ, please read the verses below. God Bless:).
1 Corinthians 15:1-4
King James Version
15 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand;
2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain.
3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;
4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
Ephesians 1:13
King James Version
13 In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise, God Bless:)
It's eternity, you want to spend it in heaven not hell. Please read the book of John, and ask God for understanding and He will show you. Please look into it.
The evidence is all there.
Also look up Lee Strobel " Case for Christ"
God Bless:)
So true
That's why it's impossible to convince atheists that God exists
@@shum8104 you are funny
I really wish Dawkins prepared himself for this debate. He should of done some research into what kind of a person Billy is. It did seem he was thrown off by the stupidity of Billy.
Agreed.
should have
could have
would have
777NihonSloan
Because you don't have arguments or discussions with Bill... he just talks shit and spews out nonsense, he is an overgrown toddler.
Michael Brown Correct. And?
boomstick900 There is only one truth and it's not science. Evolution is wrong and is the work of satan. If you want true salvation then you must submit to our creator and lord Jason Genova and his messenger *sweet prince Andrew (gains be upon him)* for more info look up the *delray misfits*
Problem with Bill O'Reilly is he never shuts up and lets his guest speak...
That sounds like Matt Dilhunty....🤔
@@rs72098 Hardly, but when Matt Dillahunty does interrupt somebody, it's because they've egregiously misinterpreted something and he tries to correct them before they continue. The difference between Dillahunty and O'Reilly however is that Matt is an educator, whereas Bill's a sensationalist TV host who never knows what he's talking about. One of those is a big red flag. I'll let you guess which one.
Because O’Reilly is a true spieler. His “guests” only serve the purpose of bolstering his self-image among his viewers.
He also doesn't listen to what Dawkins is saying, and try to evaluate it. He just keeps spouting what he believes, with no regard to the arguments against it.
That’s not a problem. It’s a strategy people use when they’re losing a debate in an attempt to seem like they’re winning. Sometimes the other side gets flustered and the strategy actually works. In this case Dawkins maintained his composure and responded with logic making Bill look like the fool that he is
One is a thinking man, the other is Bill O'Reilly.
Next time Bill O'Reilly goes to the hospital, just have the doctors send him to the church instead, see how much he heals without science and facts.
Maybe the doctor will have some "self truths" about what the cure should be, no need to worry about the actual truth 😂
Jesus heals.
@A M christians don’t believe in science at all, they think adam and eve come out of nowhere n fucked 1000 times to populate the earth
@@jaseimmitchell1145 i wish you were wrong, but so many of the right wing christians truly believe we all came from the same 2 people. I also think we need to point out which part of christianity because republican jesus doesnt turn the other cheeck, he reloads
Marius, have Dawkins go to the hospital and have the doctors do nothing, "literally nothing."
Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing."
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God.
The difference in intellect between these two is mindblowing. O'Reilly down't even possess the mind to comprehend Richard's points. This discussion is just useless. It's like debating a bowl of flowers.
More like a bowl of turds 💩
After watching this I understand a little bit better how it can be that there is such a fool in the White House...
Bill OReilly is a skillful debater. He took an attacking position first and did not acknowledge the validity of many of Dawkins' statements. Instead, he immediately capitalizes on Dawkins' comment and incorporates some of the content as part of his own view, even if indirectly. Bill OReilly is very definitely intelligent and does understand Dawkins' points very well. Atheism requires a greater degree of courage for believers of religion to face the implicit bonds between the words of doctrine and their underlying fears of what life and death will be like without faith as a habit. For whatever reason, OReilly does not admit to a sufficient degree of doubt which supports a transition to the frankest view of nature which is scientific.
The faith response can be called laziness at a superficial level of assessment but there is a deeper personal emotional challenge to take a meta view of what psychological training we mostly receive in our youth and cultural upbringing.
Atheists/agnostics too owe to themselves to have a clear ability to express their view of nature and the cosmos. A commitment to a scientific view does not obliterate our social humanity.
@@honingbijtje83 I'll admit I was leaning towards Trump's side until he started pandering to christians. I don't quite agree with all of Biden's plans but I sure as hell would like to see what he'll do. I hope to see secularism pushed more by his administration but we shall see.
Thats insulting towards flowers
Bill "wins" arguments by never shutting up & trying to steamroll his opponents with stupidity.
He was a bullying asshole. And now he's irrelevant. Just like Tucker and Megyn. All of them worthless and replaceable with younger bullshit bobbleheads.
Bill admitted he doubted the divinity of Christ. By the metrics of his own religion, he is going to hell.
Well, at least he gives his guests an opportunity for exposure to sell their absurd sh!tty books .....such as this cretin .
He started off the interview defensive as fuck
When you can’t dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullsh*t.
I forgot how infuriating Bill O'Reilly was. Fox news has always been a right wing sewer but just watching this clip from years ago is making my blood boil all over again
Yeah yeah shut up and send us a picture of your ass already
Not all right wingers believe in religion. I’m an extreme right winger and I’m an atheist.😊
@@Mostopinionatedmanofalltime And yet you are domb as hell 🤣 the boi is proud to be a right wing 😂 wtf
@@feliperamedeirosI used to be on the left but you guys have pushed reason, logic, science, fact and truth so far out of the picture, you’re the biggest hypocrites on the planet, all the politicians on the left are dirtier than anyone on the right, you guys are on this crazy witch hunt for the man with orange skin. Banana republic, prosecute your political adversary tactics, you’ve got a senile, bumbling, babbling grandpa who can’t find his way out of as wet paper bag running the country wrapped up in corruption, can’t string a coherent sentence together…The left has become so foul and disgusting and the woke bs is getting so out of control, you’re shoving moderate people over to the other side every second and you’re so righteous and dishonest that it’s hilarious to me that you’d shame someone for being far right. People like you are creating and emboldening the far right, can you truly not see that? Nope, you can’t because you’re full of shit and u Rikki g yo look at your side with honest eyes and you’re all fervently looking for the destruction of the constitution and the country.
The sheer tone is enough to distinguish who's more humble and educated. Richard waits patiently until this idiot have stop talking. And on that, when you have someone on for an interview, you let them talk. This is the other way around. He's just constantly talking over Richard, his guest, in fear that Richard might find the opportunity to absolutely humiliate him on national TV, which Dawkins would not have even consider.
Richard is educated to you and you are as empty as he is.
Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing."
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God.
@@2fast2block Fuck off, ya dumb shithead
Richard is a bully in most debates. He's also dismissive of any philosophical viewpoint incompatible with his. There's a reason why academic philosophers don't take him seriously.
@@fanofdawkins6824 of course you want me to go away because I show how clueless Dawkins and his followers are. Poor, poor, little brain, you.
There are a ton of hypothesis about what happened before the big bang that do not require yahweh. Go away
Bill, on the rise and fall of the tides: "I understand the physiology of it..."
HAHAHA!!! 😂😂😂
He’s such a dolt.
The “fizziology” as O’Reilly would spell it.
He thoroughly understands the shroedingers dog behind quantum addition
@@gungeternal4119 Hahaha Cut him some slack, a good night’s rest and a hot sudsing in the shower with a falafel and he’ll get it together.
@@Wormuloid4157 LOL
So, apparently Bill hasn't understood how tidal forces work for a long time.
I’ve never seen a better representation of “suffering fools gladly.” Dawkins shows immense discipline in not just bursting out laughing at O’Reilly.
"you can't prove that Apollo is not"
"I've seen Apollo man, he's not doing too good".
What an argument for god that is Bill, well done.
Yes a none argument at all, is solid argument
Go join Dawkins so you both could have your stooo-pid party.
Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing."
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God.
God is the reason for us and all we have.
ruclips.net/video/JiMqzN_YSXU/видео.html
“However improbable the origin of life might be, we know it happened on Earth because we are here.” -Richard Dawkins.
We only get life from life...the law of biogenesis. We can't get anything without God.
The odds are NOT there.
ruclips.net/video/W1_KEVaCyaA/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/yW9gawzZLsk/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/ddaqSutt5aw/видео.html
No, the eye did not evolve into various eyes. Your mere chance mutations are absurd.
ruclips.net/video/X7h2HWcTwa4/видео.html
Even Dawkins admits we can't know what is true because of natural selection...
The God Delusion, “Since we are creatures of natural selection, we cannot totally trust our senses. Evolution only passes on traits that help a species survive, and not with preserving traits that tell a species what is actually true about life.”
Oh, but Dawkins knows what's true about life...killing those who don't meet his expectations for living.
dailycaller.com/2021/05/19/richard-dawkins-down-syndrome-roe-v-wade/
Dawkins bringing up Apollo was the stupid part. Polytheism is illogical and therefore no Christian apologist would ever entertain the thought of multiple God's. We defend the idea of one creator of the universe, not fucking greek gods for fucks sake. Dawkins is straw manning and Bill decides not to take the bait by saying something silly.
😂
@@davidjamessmith6055 if you want to laugh, look at my comment above and let's see what you have to laugh about.
Bill shut up when grownups are talking.
Tamás DM haha haha... exactly....after he lost his show he was angry at Zeus
In just 4 minutes O'Reilly promoted this book better than Dawkins could ever hope to do
I do have to hand it to Bill. He did a great job of marketing The God Delusion......whether he wanted to or not lol!!
I’m a catholic priest and just changed to being an atheist after listening to bill
@@jb111082 Jesus Christ is the only way to heaven. Jesus Christ Loves you so much.
Hell is real.
You can have eternal life through The Lord Jesus Christ, please read the verses below. God Bless:).
1 Corinthians 15:1-4
King James Version
15 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand;
2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain.
3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;
4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
Ephesians 1:13
King James Version
13 In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise,
Jesus Christ is the only way to heaven. Jesus Christ Loves you so much.
Hell is real.
You can have eternal life through The Lord Jesus Christ, please read the verses below. God Bless:).
1 Corinthians 15:1-4
King James Version
15 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand;
2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain.
3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;
4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
Ephesians 1:13
King James Version
13 In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise,
This reminds me of when i tried to explain the moon to my 5 year old.
'Truth' and 'Belief' are NOT interchangeable.
Jesus Christ is the only way to heaven. Jesus Christ Loves you so much.
Hell is real.
You can have eternal life through The Lord Jesus Christ, please read the verses below. God Bless:).
1 Corinthians 15:1-4
King James Version
15 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand;
2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain.
3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;
4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
Ephesians 1:13
King James Version
13 In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise, God Bless:)
It's eternity, you want to spend it in heaven not hell. Please read the book of John, and ask God for understanding and He will show you. Please look into it.
The evidence is all there.
Also look up Lee Strobel " Case for Christ"
God Bless:)
Why has the Bill O'Reilly show not been cancelled yet?
cuz its the most highly rated show on cable thats why. on ALL of cable. not just news opinion shows.
genius mchaggis
I'm scared to know there are that many idiots out there who actually watch his show. Besides the people who want to watch him to make fun of his stupidity.
cDynasty001
YOU dont watch his show. you mock yet you know nothing. youve never seen the show in your fucking life have you? THATS stupid.
genius mchaggis
Why would I want to watch an arrogant creatard who talks over people? I don't want to lose brain cells.
cDynasty001
just as i thought. YOUVE NEVER SEEN THE FUCKING SHOW. and YET you yap. you ignorant fuck.
Richard Dawkins IQ:160s
Bill Oriely IQ:90s
just my opinion from what i have observed.
Eamon Minges You're a generous man :-)
pineapplepenumbra Wait, i am confused what do you mean? (Currently scratching my head)
Eamon Minges When I said that you were generous I was referring to your suggesting that Bill's IQ is as high as 90 ;-)
pineapplepenumbra so whats his actual IQ
“oH I sAw aPollO mAn, hEs nOt lOoKinG gOoD” god damn…
Bill basically did a “its my truth”. Lol. There is the truth. There is no my truth.
I think he used the phrase wrong. My understand the use of that phrase is in reference to one's own experience. An emotion someone has is their truth because no one else can verify it but that doesn't mean it's not true if that makes sense
@@FrensKafka was gonna say pretty much the same thing. When it comes to unprovable things then their can be some subjectivism to what people can justifiably call “the truth”. It basically means “my belief” or “what I consider to be the truth”.
And that goes to anything; Something's true, or it's not true. It can't be "FoR Me ThIs Is TrUtH"
There are spiritual truths. It's not all 1s and zeroes.
It's like when your Dad says he is going to take you fishing and then dies in a car wreck on the way back from the whore house. The kids spiritual truth is that you still believe your Dad was going to take you fishing and it was going to be a good day.
@@zgarrett14 spiritual beliefs? Yeah, I corrected that mistake you made. Lol. Smh, imagine diluting the meaning of truth, which SHOULD and MUST be universal, with individual creed. Bro.
"it had to come from somewhere" where did god come from bill?
Mr. Existence what was the point in gods existence when the dinosaurs existed ?
Mr. Existence it actually does
That is fucking stupid you have no evidence to back up that claim. Such huge claims require evidence.
Mr. Existence wait so you people can question our way of thinking and beliefs but we can't question yours? The irony!
Well guys if there was evidence of God, Lucifer, and Lucifer fallen angels would you be open to it?
How this man Bill lasted on TV is a miracle.
Dawkins only lasted by goofs like you.
Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing."
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God.
God is the reason for us and all we have.
ruclips.net/video/JiMqzN_YSXU/видео.html
“However improbable the origin of life might be, we know it happened on Earth because we are here.” -Richard Dawkins.
We only get life from life...the law of biogenesis. We can't get anything without God.
The odds are NOT there.
ruclips.net/video/W1_KEVaCyaA/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/yW9gawzZLsk/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/ddaqSutt5aw/видео.html
No, the eye did not evolve into various eyes. Your mere chance mutations are absurd.
ruclips.net/video/X7h2HWcTwa4/видео.html
Even Dawkins admits we can't know what is true because of natural selection...
The God Delusion, “Since we are creatures of natural selection, we cannot totally trust our senses. Evolution only passes on traits that help a species survive, and not with preserving traits that tell a species what is actually true about life.”
Oh, but Dawkins knows what's true about life...killing those who don't meet his expectations for living.
dailycaller.com/2021/05/19/richard-dawkins-down-syndrome-roe-v-wade/
It really isn't that miraculous when you consider the number of conservatives in the country...lol
@@MizzouRah78
Anyway, praise Jeebus.
He's a talking head that only has to read the talking points and play the agenda of his puppet masters. Intelligence, charisma, respect for honest journalism, etc. aren't necessary in the world of political propaganda.
@@MizzouRah78 yup they are dumb as rocks
Dawkins - "Well if you look at the science..."
Bill - "I WILL NOT!"
Why does Dawkins waste his time with these people?
tigermunky Like his time is worth that much anyway.
He didn't waste a second with the O'Reilly buffoon. What he did was to SHOW their "discussion" to the fox news audience, among whom a small fraction will realize that these atheists guys seem in fact to know more and to be nicer than what their preacher told them... I respect that.
Promoting his book, not a waste of time at all.
Joey: But … you didn't prove that vanilla's the best.
Nick: I didn't have to. I proved that you're wrong, and if you're wrong, I'm right.
Joey: But you still didn't convince me.
Nick: Because I'm not after you. I'm after them.
- Thank You For Smoking.
'These people' speak to the masses on television every night. Dawkins made a decision for his movement.
What a way to waste Richard's time...
what are you talking about?
Ya, I think he's wasting all of our time by his stupid ideas.
Oh, and he's making a lot of money by writing books...... but of course that's all for the betterment of humanity... he's a true angel at heart.....
"Increasingly fewer Americans believe in God"
Best news ever reported on FNC
Hmmm... Is it? There may or may not be a God, but look where it got us - the philosophy, the morals... Religion is necessary... And be careful, more people denying God is something most theists regards as prophecy.
@@SS-eo5jn Which religion is necessary?
@@SS-eo5jn Religion poisons our morals. We are able to be good to one another in spite of wicked Religion, not because of it.
@@Kairi091 I said religion is necessary... I did not even hint I meant one in particular.
If I said politics and education poisons our brains, it would be untrue. Religion does not poison us on its own. These three things, among others, are only dangerous when mixed with ignorance and the ugliness of human nature.
If you wish to demonstrate how religion is poisonous, please do so.
@@Kairi091 Some religions are based off love, it must be extraneous variables that alter it. This is clear to some people...
In a Homer Simpson voice: "Tide goes in, tide goes out, tide goes in, tide goes out..." etc
Ironically, listening to Christian arguments for God inevitably makes me think "Oh God"
You're a dolt so go pretend to be smart with your fellow nitwit Dawkins.
Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing."
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God.
God is the reason for us and all we have.
ruclips.net/video/JiMqzN_YSXU/видео.html
“However improbable the origin of life might be, we know it happened on Earth because we are here.” -Richard Dawkins.
We only get life from life...the law of biogenesis. We can't get anything without God.
The odds are NOT there.
ruclips.net/video/W1_KEVaCyaA/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/yW9gawzZLsk/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/ddaqSutt5aw/видео.html
No, the eye did not evolve into various eyes. Your mere chance mutations are absurd.
ruclips.net/video/X7h2HWcTwa4/видео.html
Even Dawkins admits we can't know what is true because of natural selection...
The God Delusion, “Since we are creatures of natural selection, we cannot totally trust our senses. Evolution only passes on traits that help a species survive, and not with preserving traits that tell a species what is actually true about life.”
Oh, but Dawkins knows what's true about life...killing those who don't meet his expectations for living.
dailycaller.com/2021/05/19/richard-dawkins-down-syndrome-roe-v-wade/
Wow the arrogance the Bill O'Reilly is outstanding
Luke Vanhaezebrouck he's had a big head ever since he did it live
Dawkins rules.
His level of patience is causing me anxiety ✊
Right!?!
too bad he's not dead yet, i will happily rejoice that day like with dianne feinstein just now lol! also gays still get executed in islam countries, why not save them my brave atheist?
Bill's flippant line about Apollo not looking too good has always been a belt sander on my brain.
Bill: I am a Christian
Richard: Why?
Bill: Because you can't prove it's not true!
He cant prove i am not god. Which means he has to believe in me
If something can’t be proven to be untrue, then it must be true! 😂😂😂😂
Gods the existence of Love. Everybody believes Love exists.
@@damianedwards2327 you cant compare, love didn't write any books or commandments and asked the followers to worship it
@@tme98 With your logic all religion is true and we have hundreds of thousands of Gods AND THEY'RE ALL REAL. LMAO
"The tides go in the tides go out, no one can explain that" bill o'Reilly
As Beorge Carlin said : “Think of how stupid the average person is. Then realise that half the people are even more stupid than that.” Guess which half 0’ Reilly is in.
"and the sun goes up and the sun goes down".. oreilly is so dumb he still doesnt understand that the earth revoles around the sun....
@@stesj4 , within the context of the conversation he makes it clear he understands that the tides are influenced by the moon. What he's referring to is the extreme fine tuning that makes life possible and which permits our planet able to sustain life in the first place, that's what he's referring to when he says that the best theory physicists can come up with us the "Big Bang" - there was nothing, now there is something. But how did the earth come to be so exact as to be able to sustain life, in what looks to be an otherwise barren and lifeless solar system.
“Where is faith in all of this? Is it Dawkins…” No, Dawkins is not putting faith into science, science is a process used to explain phenomena in the natural world. It uses evidence and observations to substantiate what is “true”. O’Reilly is not not looking for what is true, he “throws his hat in” with Catholics because science doesn’t have every question answered. The problem is it does have far more questions answered and and is far more representative of the natural world than any religion is and by not accepting this you are ignoring the reality in which you exist. Does ignoring reality in favour of a hypothetical god seem reasonable?
You wish to forgo religion, but still believe in a “creator” that’s fine, but why? Is just because, much like O’Reilly, science has not laid out everything, explained everything so you need to fill this gap with a god? Why is that? Will this gap keep shrinking as more information come available? How do you reconcile this? You are insisting to yourself and expressing to others that because there are no answers at this time, you must delude yourself into accepting a premise with no evidentiary basis as true and real, does this sound rational to you?
@@stesj4 so because you don't know, you fill it with god? Why can't "I don't knoe" be enough?
Forget all of Richard Dawkins' achievements. We'll just lable him as an "ATHEIST".
Well they don't want to credit Dawkins as a PhD, Evolutionary Biology, Professor, or any other title, as they don't want to give their audience the impression that he's actually an achieved intelectual and proper expert in a scientific field, as that doesn't fit with the Christian propaganda that atheists are just stupid and hateful people who hate God.
It's strange how swiftly O'Reilly went from completely ubiquitous to utterly forgotten in like a year or two.
He ended up where he belongs in the natural order of things. The garbage bin. It's a shame he made so much money before he left
Who's O'Really? Never heard of the guy.
Dawkins really got him with the “You can’t prove Zeus is not” line and they both knew it.
@@AbsenceOfLogic Anyone with a functioning brain understands that Bill O'Reilly is a fool of the biggest caliber. If it was customary in his religion to get wards & charms to drive off evil spirits, then he'd be the first guy in the line to buy them. He'd be that gullible. When I was young my parents bought all kinds of science magazines for our family. They included various topics, random topics and one even might have contained an explanation for the tides. Of course I've long taken it for granted that the Moon actually has a great effect on the tidal forces in our seas, but well.. would Billy care about that?
God created Zeus.
@@TheRealDebussyFarts
And I sharted God.
Just yesterday, taking my morning dump.
But still he's been there all along. Hurray, what a miracle!
@@TheRealDebussyFarts Provide me a timeline please. We talking 3600BC, did he create all the other Gods? Also, why would he? He is infinite, he can not need anything. Did he create all Gods?
Dawkins is a joke.
Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing."
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God.
Dr Dawkins has a lot of patience, I must say
'Jesus is a real guy, I could see it. I know what he did.''
I didn't know Bill O'Reilly is a time-traveler.
he sounds like someone who is quite aware they're wrong but is too afraid to face it because they've shaped their life around bullshit and the idea of transitioning towards a non retarded perception is too uncomfortable for them.
He also saw Apollo.
"All confirmed Atheists"
WHY IS THIS GUY ON TELEVISION?! It's fucking insane how this guy has the power to talk to millions of people in America!
I'm on your side, buddy.
One of the most childish quotes from Bill was "Okay, I don't care about the constitution. The constitution isn't here. You're here. Don't be a pinhead!" back in a 2009 interview.
Bill's talking to the American millions that has No imput in getting to the Moon & back.
I’m glad Bill clarified that he was referring to the word bane and not the brutish supervillain Bain. An important distinction, thank you Bill.
I think O'Reilly is just scared of intelligent people that can destroy his arguments.
Exactly.
Yeah O'reilly was throwing out generalizations, broad ones. And Dawkins was going so far over O'Reillys head that he didn't even really realize it all that much.
Every time Richard made a well thought point, Bill would brush it off and change the subject.
a person of low to little intelligence could destroy his arguments :P
CCJJ160Channels yes
O'Reilly : "Being humble is a christian value",
Dawkins: "Then you are not a christian."
HAHAHAHA.
OOF
Haha hilarious.
@@edminer9061 He ain't wrong though. By character, nature and act, Dawkins is literally more like the ideal Christian than O'Reilley.
😂😂😂
Dawkins's patience and humility is remarkable lol. He goes on these shows despite knowing that the ignorant hosts will not actually interview him fairly or allow him to speak equally.
THAT and probably money.
John 1
King James Version
1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
God loves you so much that He sent His only begotten Son to die on the cross to pay for your sins.
If you believe and put your trust in Jesus Christ, that He died on the cross to pay your sin debt and that He rose again on the third day, you will be saved. once you are saved, you will not die in your sins and be damned to hell for eternity.
God will remove your sins and your soul will be washed clean with the blood that Jesus Christ shed for us on the cross.
your own good works will not get you into heaven. Jesus Christ did all of the work for you, all you have to do is believe and put your trust in Him and He will save you.
Ephesians 1:13
King James Version
13 In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise,.
Jesus Christ is coming back very soon and we all have to be ready.
I pray in Jesus Christ's mighty name that you be saved. :)
Bill O’Reilly is me in every job interview.
Unable to stop saying stupid things?
@@upturnedblousecollar5811 more like funemployed 🥳
One of the funniest comments I've read in a long time 🏆 ty for the laughter 🙏
Physiology and physics are no interchangeable terms.
Body of Christ?
"Because my majic book says so"
Colin O'Brien does not do not, does so does so!!! This is the defense I hear from the immature and backward religious right.
Colin O'Brien atleast in magic there's a magician XD. Hahahhahaha
My magic book has more answers then what you have.
2002hur
That we already have a boatload of. String theory, M-theory, multiverse, inflation... take your pick of of excuse theories.
Problem is, if my book is wrong it doesn't matter to me. I'll just be dead. What if your fairy tales are wrong?
Colin O'Brien the magick book predicted that the universe is expanding, it also predicted germs, and that the earth was spherical while the popular belief was that it was flat.....lol and it has answers to who created everything when the athiests and the agnostics still have been unable to answer..not to mention the foretelling of prophecy after prophecy...hmmm I think I'll go with the magick book on this one;) lol
The amount of stupidity Prof Dawkins is up against is horrifying. Can't believe how patient and polite he remains, while talking to this tool.
By Fox News standards, he's practically Isaac Newton. The only point where I really wanted to punch the face on my computer screen was when he said "you don't know how we got here." That always infuriates me. There's nothing WRONG with admitting you don't know! "I don't know" is the beginning of all scientific enquiry. Religious people don't know either, they just plug the gap with a god and that conveniently answers everything. How lazy!
FangedUgly is a stupid, horrifyingly impatient, rude tool
@@joshuakohlmann9731they don't mind being dumb that's for sure
@@joshuakohlmann9731 And the gap is getting smaller and smaller.
The tv guy sounds like a toddler when you tell them Santa isn’t real and he says NOOO HE IS REAL
i like how his tag only says "Richard Dawkins - atheist" instead of biology proffessor.
Fox News for you they try to make everyone who doesn't agree with them look bad
Any bright minded person should know that by now. Fox news are extremely one sided and will stop at nothin to help them with their bullshit
***** thats not really as tangential as it'd appear.
he takes his conclusion against religion directly based on his knowledge of biology (along with other subjects), so including his trained profession is actually relevant on the matter.
10seconds into the conversation and Richard Dawkins starts thinking why is he even there in the first place 🤣
Free plug for his book?
Zeus is real guys, you can at least see his thunderbolts :)
Slik00Silk I can actually see Mt Olympus from my house :P
Slik00Silk Nah,we talk on the phone. He is cool.
for real haha
+MeLexdy Heathen! That is Thor, smiting giants!
Guys, it's okay. We can trust Bill. He understands the physiology of it all.
"Tides go in, tides go out. You can't explain that" 😂
Bill's logic is very typical of a lot of believers. They think
_"Here's something you can't explain therefore my religion must be true."_
@@TonyEnglandUK It's called an ad ignorantiam fallacy.
Tides go in and go out in the Sea and you can See them Bill but they're not the same things.
I saw Apollo man, he's not looking good.....Yeah SAME WITH YOU, LOL
Ouch u rekt him
Which Apollo did he see? Musta been 13, and that nearly ended very badly.
"Being humble is a Christian virtue."
I thought O'Reilly said he was a Christian. There isn't one microgram of humility in that man.
Funny thing is, Dawkins, in character, act and personality is far more like a Christian rolemodel than O'Reilly.
If Jesus looked at both of them at the heart and from their actions, ironically Dawkins is a much better Christian and human being than he is, and many Christians for that matter.
Jesus Christ is the only way to heaven. Jesus Christ Loves you so much.
Hell is real.
You can have eternal life through The Lord Jesus Christ, please read the verses below. God Bless:).
1 Corinthians 15:1-4
King James Version
15 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand;
2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain.
3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;
4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
Ephesians 1:13
King James Version
13 In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise,
God Bless:)
@@SStupendous Jesus Christ is the only way to heaven. Jesus Christ Loves you so much.
Hell is real.
You can have eternal life through The Lord Jesus Christ, please read the verses below. God Bless:).
1 Corinthians 15:1-4
King James Version
15 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand;
2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain.
3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;
4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
Ephesians 1:13
King James Version
13 In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise,
God Bless:)
"I just don't think we could have lucked out to have .... the sun goes up, the sun goes down" - 😂😂😂😂 does he really not get this incredibly simple concept? 🤦♂️
Bill Oreilly with the typical reasons for belief, those being:
1. God of the Gaps
2. Fallacy of passing the Buck
Edit this in -- Adolf Hitler = “I am now as before a Catholic and will always remain so.” - (“Adolf Hitler” - John Toland [Pulitzer Prize winner] New York: Anchor Publishing, 1992, p.507)
So Oreilly ... Wrong Again.
Absolutely incorrect statements.Obviously.
@@Han-Solo459 -- so true. I should have added:
3. "Because my parents are christian!"
@@Han-Solo459 If you're going to say they're obviously incorrect, you could've continued by correcting them for us.
@@MasterSpade And I'd add
4. "Because it ensures I get many thousands of faithful, churchgoing extra viewers."
@@MasterSpade 5. A need to be rewarded.?
That is, by far, the most civilized conversation I've ever seen Bill O'Reilly have with another human being.
Yeah; he was forced into it by how extremely civilised Dawkins himself is. Unfortunately the fact that O'Reilly was still an insufferable, arrogant, disrespectful, ignorant bully in this interview shows how bad he is the rest of the time.
Welcome to the show where the host asks, and answers all the questions while the guest tries to get a word in. 🤣🤣
Ask ' O Reilly where his God came from, and he says " I don't know." Says it all. Bang on and G'day from Australia 🇦🇺.