02:00 Importance of Iman 16:00 Why we worship? 18:00 Independence 20:00 Origin of the idea of Independence 25:00 True Freedom 27:00 Meaning of Islam and Atheism 30:00 Atheism in classical Islamic theology 32:30 Fitrah - Natural Disposition 35:00 Bedion's Refutation of Atheism 37:00 Quran's refutation of Atheism 42:30 Something coming from Nothing 44:00 Imam Al-Razi's Metaphor 47:00 Law of Non-contradiction 48:30 Infinite Regress
Surah Tur 35-36: Were they created of nothing, or were they themselves the creators? (35) Or did they create the heavens and the earth? Nay, they have no firm belief. (36) أَمۡ خُلِقُواْ مِنۡ غَيۡرِ شَىۡءٍ أَمۡ هُمُ ٱلۡخَـٰلِقُونَ (٣٥) أَمۡ خَلَقُواْ ٱلسَّمَـٰوَٲتِ وَٱلۡأَرۡضَۚ بَل لَّا يُوقِنُونَ (٣٦)
I think it would be beneficial to give a knowledge-based response to the numerous podcasts that Ustadh Abdurahman Hassan released regarding Asharism / Kalam etc. I think what he's bringing forth to the public should be responded to in public.
Not worth a response. His own Shaykh Ibn Taymīyyah said in Majmu' Al-Fatawa that using Kalam is praiseworthy and useful as long as it is the good Kalam which doesn't contradict Sharia. Pseudo Salafis are only afraid of it because they don't understand it and it debunks their anthropomorphic creed.
[3476] 66 - (1421) It was narrated from In 'Abbâs that the Prophet S.A.W said: "The previously-married woman has more right concerning herself than her guardian does, and the virgin should be asked for permission, and her permission is her silence." Can anyone tell me the interpretation of this hadeeth? Does this means wali not mandatory for a previously married women?
Ilhad Atheism. Derives from Ilhah.Ilhad means deviation. It includes: Comparing Allah to anything, or any of His Attributes to those of His Creation. Denying any of Allah's Attributes or altering their true meaning. Using Allah's Names to describe anything in His Creation. To name Him with a name with which He has not named Himself. E.g. "Father". To attribute any deficiencies to Him. The person who practises Ilhad is called Mulhid.
Atheism has to do with one issue - the ridiculous and unsubstantiated claims asserted by ignorant theists that mythological gods are real. This rational position has nothing to do with social politics.
@@Theo_SkeptomaiIt's the lack of conviction in a diety. It often rests upon certain metaphysical assumptions and conflates the method of science, which is regarding discrete properties, for the universal, i.e., extrapolated to the whole. Provisory Methodological naturalism is a better position. Read up on the problem of science being third person and our selves as first person interpreters. Also how we can even attempt to appeal to reason (or logical axioms) in a blind physicalist view of the world. Then of course the hard problem of consciousness.
@@Theo_SkeptomaiTheology has to do with one issue. The ridiculous and unsubstantiated claims by athiest that something came from nothing. The rational position has everything to do with social politics.
02:00 Importance of Iman
16:00 Why we worship?
18:00 Independence
20:00 Origin of the idea of Independence
25:00 True Freedom
27:00 Meaning of Islam and Atheism
30:00 Atheism in classical Islamic theology
32:30 Fitrah - Natural Disposition
35:00 Bedion's Refutation of Atheism
37:00 Quran's refutation of Atheism
42:30 Something coming from Nothing
44:00 Imam Al-Razi's Metaphor
47:00 Law of Non-contradiction
48:30 Infinite Regress
Mashallah may Allah swt bless you and your family
ما شاء الله تبارك الله جزاكم الله خيراً و احسن الجزاء
💚
Maa'shaa Allaah Jazaak Allaah khiayran Sheikh
Mashaallah.. may Allah reward you in life here after.
masha Allah very beautiful recitation at the beginning
May Allah bless you
❤❤❤
Surah Tur 35-36: Were they created of nothing, or were they themselves the creators? (35) Or did they create the heavens and the earth? Nay, they have no firm belief. (36)
أَمۡ خُلِقُواْ مِنۡ غَيۡرِ شَىۡءٍ أَمۡ هُمُ ٱلۡخَـٰلِقُونَ (٣٥) أَمۡ خَلَقُواْ ٱلسَّمَـٰوَٲتِ وَٱلۡأَرۡضَۚ بَل لَّا يُوقِنُونَ (٣٦)
Please read the holy Quran in English or another translation insha Allah
I think it would be beneficial to give a knowledge-based response to the numerous podcasts that Ustadh Abdurahman Hassan released regarding Asharism / Kalam etc. I think what he's bringing forth to the public should be responded to in public.
Not worth a response. His own Shaykh Ibn Taymīyyah said in Majmu' Al-Fatawa that using Kalam is praiseworthy and useful as long as it is the good Kalam which doesn't contradict Sharia.
Pseudo Salafis are only afraid of it because they don't understand it and it debunks their anthropomorphic creed.
[3476] 66 - (1421) It was narrated from In 'Abbâs that the
Prophet S.A.W said:
"The previously-married woman has more right concerning herself than her guardian does, and the virgin should be asked for permission, and her permission is her silence."
Can anyone tell me the interpretation of this hadeeth? Does this means wali not mandatory for a previously married women?
Ilhad
Atheism. Derives from Ilhah.Ilhad means deviation. It includes:
Comparing Allah to anything, or any of His Attributes to those of His Creation.
Denying any of Allah's Attributes or altering their true meaning.
Using Allah's Names to describe anything in His Creation.
To name Him with a name with which He has not named Himself. E.g. "Father".
To attribute any deficiencies to Him. The person who practises Ilhad is called Mulhid.
Don't you have question answer section for Islamic question?
More rational?!? Atheism is the _only_ rational position when it comes to false claims asserting the reality of mythological gods.
how big is your fedora?
@@iamjustaguy12345 ?!?
@@iamjustaguy12345 Is there an implied joke in your comment? I don't own a fedora.
Wow so this is what ignorance looks like
@@fisher9943 Are you referring to my comment?
The alphabet community.. lol,
Atheism has to do with one issue - the ridiculous and unsubstantiated claims asserted by ignorant theists that mythological gods are real. This rational position has nothing to do with social politics.
@@Theo_SkeptomaiIt's the lack of conviction in a diety. It often rests upon certain metaphysical assumptions and conflates the method of science, which is regarding discrete properties, for the universal, i.e., extrapolated to the whole. Provisory Methodological naturalism is a better position. Read up on the problem of science being third person and our selves as first person interpreters. Also how we can even attempt to appeal to reason (or logical axioms) in a blind physicalist view of the world. Then of course the hard problem of consciousness.
@@Theo_SkeptomaiTheology has to do with one issue. The ridiculous and unsubstantiated claims by athiest that something came from nothing. The rational position has everything to do with social politics.
@@wackypeace1135 Who has claimed that "something came from nothing"? I certainly don't hold that ridiculous belief.
@@Theo_Skeptomai you make absurd claims yet provide no evidence of your claims. Now go to bed.