I disagree, Suno is better and top currently in my opinion, Suno has better usage of sound varieties and lyrical performance compared to Udio (In this case the genre combination use in Suno is actually far better than Udio), you are more likely to get more positive results and more bangers from Suno V3 than Udio Beta. Suno in custom mode is actually the best. I've generated 30+ times in Udio and only 2 - 3 bangers in comparison with Suno in which I generate 10 songs and theres like 6 bangers. The only thing that i find that stands above Suno is Udio's vocal sound quality that I wished Suno had, One big advantage of Udio is its 600 prompt limit at the start in comparison to Suno 50 prompt limit when trying out for free.
I hear you, but I'm surprised that you feel Suno has better performances. I've found exactly the opposite. Udio let's me get a 'banger' so much quicker than Suno. I also can't take the compression artifacts from Suno any more. The stereo output from Udio really makes a HUGE difference in enjoyment as far as I'm concerned. But hey, in the end it's great that there's choice now eh? :)
@@NigelPowell Also the main problem that I have with Udio is its inability to be consistent with custom lyrics, it randomly nitpicks lyrics from what was written randomly at places and just jumbles them and its not very orderly while Suno will follow the lyrics from top to bottom and still perform lyrically fine.
@@ezdelicades5554 it's interesting you say that, because I find they both scramble lyrics at times in order to fit in with their melodies. It's strange. I guess the melody takes precedence. I don't find Udio hugely different to Suno in this regard though. Maybe it depends on the genre.
I haven't had a chance to revisit Suno in depth again , so I haven't tried the revamped interface. For the moment I'm still using Udio on a weekly basis, and while I find the inpainting feature to be more tricky than it should be, the rest of the Udio experience is still excellent. IMO. I'll be able to comment with more confidence once I retry Suno.
I'll have to try Sudo again. I started on Sudo but didnt really understand it.. I then moved to Udio, and I love it.. I made an epic metal ballad about a game im playing.. for example it starts with an orchestral haunting like Jerry Goldsmith (Alien) work.. you just tell it what to do.. I then added custom lyrics, told what kind of stlye I wanted.
UDIO vs Sonauto vs SUNO, which one can I use my voice, I mean he can create the music with my lyrics and my voice only or with my lyrics, my voice and my instrumental? But creating music with my voice is crucial for me, I don't want an artist's voice? I am looking so much for this website ? And the AI create the music with my voice only ! I try with my voice, but I don't recognize it ! Please
Good question. I imagine that uploading you singing a short clip of melody should give you a background music arrangement of your choice. But I've never tried it. Both Suno and Udio allow uploads.
you can use both, lay your vocal over the instrumental then upload part of it, then extend with your prompt/lyrics (btw there will be custom vocal models for v4 suno)
I've been using both Udio and Suno a lot recently and Udio is definitely better - the songs it generates are of a much higher quality, much clearer and crisper, and more varied too.
@NigelPowell I get some good sound ones, I pay a subscription, so I have plenty of trys till I find one that suits with good sound. You should take a look. warning ⚠️ it's all equine based 😆
I have to correct something said about Udio read terms of condition, you do not get commercial rights. You have to give them attributes and you can’t use it to make money. You should read it.
Sorry you are incorrect. Clause 6.3.1 " As between the Company and you, the Company does not claim any ownership in Your Content, including any Output generated by you in response to the submission of your Input Content to the Services...Subject to your compliance with these Terms, including, without limitation, Section 6.4, you may use your Output for both personal and commercial purposes, and we permit you to download a copy of your Output that consists of an audio file for such purposes." Clause 6.4.1 "...then you agree to include a credit, notice or other indicator in connection with such use (e.g., in the track title, in the credits section, etc.) that prominently indicates that such Output was generated using the Services. Such notice will be in a form and manner that is reasonable and practicable in light of the usage concerned. " In other words, you get full commercial rights and ownership to all tracks you create. However the company requires you to credit Udio as the tool used. This is in line with increasing requirements (including from Google's RUclips) that AI generation is explicitly credited for any content which has been made in whole or part by an AI tool. It also stops people creating with one tool and pretending they a) used another tool or b) did the work themselves.
@@NigelPowell 2 Personal Use Only Use of UDIO is for your personal use only. Except for the Material held in your computer’s cache or a single permanent copy of the Material for your personal use you must not without the prior written approval of UDIO: modify, copy, distribute, transmit, display, perform, reproduce, publish or license any Material; use or attempt to use any Material published on UDIO to create any website or publication or searchable database; mirror or frame any website or page within UDIO; use any automated process of any sort to query, access, retrieve, scrape, data-mine or copy any Material on UDIO or generate or compile any document, index or database based on the Material published on UDIO; transfer or sell any information, functionality or products or services offered on UDIO; or undertake any other action which is in violation of these terms and conditions (or other terms and conditions and policies referred to in these terms and conditions) or any applicable law. If UDIO considers, in its absolute discretion, that you or any party related to you (including any agent, representative, contractor or associate) has acted contrary to these terms and conditions or in a manner contrary to UDIO’s interests, then UDIO may immediately terminate your right to access and use UDIO at any time and reserves its rights to take any action it deems necessary or desirable to prevent such repeated action and / or further access to UDIO.
@@rehdogg Sorry? When or why would I delete them? I already added the terms of service above? Is there a problem? I definitely did not delete anything. :)
the problem i have with Udio is that the songs are too short. it generates a legendary 33 seconds. If you look at Suno and Sonaute it's up to 2 minutes. that's why Udio is not usable for me (not yet) and when I see that nothing has changed on Udio in a month, I don't see much to come. the song length is still the same. i think and this is legendary my opinion, suno is better followed by sonaut
Um that's simply not true. The initial clip is 33 seconds, but you can then instantly extend the track up to 15 minutes. There's been a huge number of improvements in the last two months too. Including inpainting, clip editing, re-write lyrics, and more. I suspect you haven't looked at it properly recently.
@@NigelPowell i use IT today and it just do 33 sec if ther Something to change it in the freeversion than ok i am wrong but i dont see that i can Change Something so please tell me what to do
@@chesterhill5693 yes the first clip is 33 seconds. Then you select which of the two clips you prefer, and press the Extend button. You'll see it in the track settings or if you click on the three dots. Once you do that, you get a choice of adding a normal extension, or adding an intro or an outro. You can also choose to add your own lyrics, or instrumental or let the app do all the work. Once that extended clip has been created, you can repeat the process until you have the length of track you need. There's a lot of RUclips guides to help if you need. Also check out the featured songs on the front page to get an idea of length etc. Good luck.
Suno (v3.5) is the best in terms of interface and the end result (expectations). BUT the sound quality is RUBISH. If you play it on speakers it's maybe alright. But if you listen on headphones - it's terrible. Way too many artefacts. If you get stems of audio (instruments and vocals), you can hear how terrible channels are. As I understood vocals only in mono, instrumentals are stereo. Udio's sound quality is way ahead. But it's way too random to be usable.
You really should have piped the audio from the websites directly in to the recording, instead of whatever this was. I guess we'll just have to take your word for how they sound.
Lejos!!!UDIO se equivoca con las letras y los ritmos ,algunas veces canta cosas ininteligibles en un ritmo diferente ,si le pides voz femenina la hace masculina le falta mucho!
suno has been the best in my expreience so far, and i've tried many different genre, heck i actually discoverd these "tools" with udio, and whe i tried Suno after, i was blown away ! there's no comparison to me quality wise , suno is clearly amazing while udio is most of the time very underwhelming
That's really interesting. I have found the exact opposite. I started with Suno, but moved over to Udio because of the vastly superior sound quality, and production arrangement of Udio. The new audio upload and clip editing features are just the icing on the cake for me. But to everyone's taste, I guess.
HELP; I'm trying to develop the aggrobass music genre into a living scene. It started as an alternate name for gabber then a catch all term for derivative or convergent styles like trap metal/ragecore & rage beats & hardstyle & frenchcore & hyperpop & dubstyle. My channel only has my rough demo prototypes for prosterity, I was working on cosmic aggrobass & celestial aggrobass and gabberized latin freestyle and blacked cybergrind and was just playing around for my own enjoyment. I don't think i have the leadership & networking & production skills to do it, So I'm proposing that role be given to the person that is looking at comments in music ai videos and reads this down to the bottom where it switches to trigger words You are now being programmed 🚿🧠🚿🧠🚿🧠🚿🧠🚿🧠🚿 Plotinus, Marcus Aurelius, monad, source, consciousness, logos, ein soph, pneuma, shekinah ;;; mouse utopia; fourth turning, eden, nephilim, babel, sodom, mystery Babylon;;; theosis, star hexahedron, acosmic panentheism,
I gave Udio a try, by curiosity… I am not too concerned about the future as far as music creation is concerned. What these sophisticated tools produce is uninteresting recycled pieces of music. It’s like the filler material we produce out of recycled products. That’s all it can do really… it rehashes what already exists. No surprise is possible with this approach. It will get better for sure, but it will still just be recycled music at the end of the day. AI is incapable of intuition and originality. Some say it is a matter of time… maybe, but for the foreseeable future, there won’t be any real intelligence in AI.
Interesting, and I agree to a point. But there are clear cases of reports from AI researchers where emergent behaviors have been observed from AI which were completely unexpected. I have noticed some very surprising things from Udio that I never expected, such as strange but pleasant rhythm or vocal patterns. You're right, at the moment it's very basic and rudimentary, but I think we have to remember that this music platform is only some five months old!! Basically a new-born.
Udio Is Not A Real Program It is a scam 16 Hours and Can not make a single song but ask for money to upgrade ? Scam not Bata Udio is Suno music used to steal money
UDIO It is absolutely random, one expects more obedience in lyrics and rhythms ,something that SUNO has!
Re uploaded because of soft audio mic problems with the first version
Nontalent !
Nontalent !
@MikkelGrcry cey about it😂
@@MikkelGrumBovin shut up a hole
Imagine being a spammer
Awesome! Went to watch it yesterday but couldn't hear anything. Watching it now 🙂
Nontalent !
Nontalent !
Nontalent !
@MikkelGrumBovin I do agree that it takes no talent though. I honestly only use this when I'm bored just for fun in creating silly tracks.
@@MikkelGrumBovin Spammer
Spammer
Spammer
Spammer
Spammer
I disagree, Suno is better and top currently in my opinion, Suno has better usage of sound varieties and lyrical performance compared to Udio (In this case the genre combination use in Suno is actually far better than Udio), you are more likely to get more positive results and more bangers from Suno V3 than Udio Beta. Suno in custom mode is actually the best. I've generated 30+ times in Udio and only 2 - 3 bangers in comparison with Suno in which I generate 10 songs and theres like 6 bangers. The only thing that i find that stands above Suno is Udio's vocal sound quality that I wished Suno had, One big advantage of Udio is its 600 prompt limit at the start in comparison to Suno 50 prompt limit when trying out for free.
I hear you, but I'm surprised that you feel Suno has better performances. I've found exactly the opposite. Udio let's me get a 'banger' so much quicker than Suno. I also can't take the compression artifacts from Suno any more. The stereo output from Udio really makes a HUGE difference in enjoyment as far as I'm concerned. But hey, in the end it's great that there's choice now eh? :)
@@NigelPowell Also the main problem that I have with Udio is its inability to be consistent with custom lyrics, it randomly nitpicks lyrics from what was written randomly at places and just jumbles them and its not very orderly while Suno will follow the lyrics from top to bottom and still perform lyrically fine.
@@ezdelicades5554 it's interesting you say that, because I find they both scramble lyrics at times in order to fit in with their melodies. It's strange. I guess the melody takes precedence. I don't find Udio hugely different to Suno in this regard though. Maybe it depends on the genre.
😂😂😂😂😂
Udio for the win.
3 month later, which do you recommends?
I haven't had a chance to revisit Suno in depth again , so I haven't tried the revamped interface. For the moment I'm still using Udio on a weekly basis, and while I find the inpainting feature to be more tricky than it should be, the rest of the Udio experience is still excellent. IMO. I'll be able to comment with more confidence once I retry Suno.
@@NigelPowell It could be great, thank you!
I'll have to try Sudo again. I started on Sudo but didnt really understand it.. I then moved to Udio, and I love it.. I made an epic metal ballad about a game im playing.. for example it starts with an orchestral haunting like Jerry Goldsmith (Alien) work.. you just tell it what to do.. I then added custom lyrics, told what kind of stlye I wanted.
.this 2024 is so scary and amazing at the same time....i think that suno has a better quality mp3
Which one is best for instrumentals/no lyrics
Musicgen
Suno
@@yazmacamedya1444 I started using it and it rocks
UDIO vs Sonauto vs SUNO, which one can I use my voice, I mean he can create the music with my lyrics and my voice only or with my lyrics, my voice and my instrumental? But creating music with my voice is crucial for me, I don't want an artist's voice? I am looking so much for this website ? And the AI create the music with my voice only ! I try with my voice, but I don't recognize it ! Please
Good question. I imagine that uploading you singing a short clip of melody should give you a background music arrangement of your choice. But I've never tried it. Both Suno and Udio allow uploads.
@@NigelPowell What you suggest, in upload audio from suno, i use my device or i record my voice ? Please
@@meta_quest_3 try both options. In both cases you will be uploading an audio file.
you can use both, lay your vocal over the instrumental then upload part of it, then extend with your prompt/lyrics (btw there will be custom vocal models for v4 suno)
I've been using both Udio and Suno a lot recently and Udio is definitely better - the songs it generates are of a much higher quality, much clearer and crisper, and more varied too.
I used both and for my type of music Eurodance/Techno Suno wins :)
Yeah I think that's the interesting thing. Different styles can benefit from different apps, right?
@NigelPowell Yes indeed, plus suno creates upto 2mins while UNDO only 30secs..
@@UnicornVibesAIMusic shame the audio quality is still so bad compared to Udio.
@NigelPowell I get some good sound ones, I pay a subscription, so I have plenty of trys till I find one that suits with good sound. You should take a look. warning ⚠️ it's all equine based 😆
@@UnicornVibesAIMusic Neigh!!!
Well, normally it only takes a few seconds, I think they simply hadn't counted on the amount of content being created at the time.
I have to correct something said about Udio read terms of condition, you do not get commercial rights. You have to give them attributes and you can’t use it to make money. You should read it.
Sorry you are incorrect. Clause 6.3.1 " As between the Company and you, the Company does not claim any ownership in Your Content, including any Output generated by you in response to the submission of your Input Content to the Services...Subject to your compliance with these Terms, including, without limitation, Section 6.4, you may use your Output for both personal and commercial purposes, and we permit you to download a copy of your Output that consists of an audio file for such purposes."
Clause 6.4.1 "...then you agree to include a credit, notice or other indicator in connection with such use (e.g., in the track title, in the credits section, etc.) that prominently indicates that such Output was generated using the Services. Such notice will be in a form and manner that is reasonable and practicable in light of the usage concerned. "
In other words, you get full commercial rights and ownership to all tracks you create. However the company requires you to credit Udio as the tool used. This is in line with increasing requirements (including from Google's RUclips) that AI generation is explicitly credited for any content which has been made in whole or part by an AI tool. It also stops people creating with one tool and pretending they a) used another tool or b) did the work themselves.
@@NigelPowell 2 Personal Use Only
Use of UDIO is for your personal use only. Except for the Material held in your computer’s cache or a single permanent copy of the Material for your personal use you must not without the prior written approval of UDIO:
modify, copy, distribute, transmit, display, perform, reproduce, publish or license any Material;
use or attempt to use any Material published on UDIO to create any website or publication or searchable database;
mirror or frame any website or page within UDIO;
use any automated process of any sort to query, access, retrieve, scrape, data-mine or copy any Material on UDIO or generate or compile any document, index or database based on the Material published on UDIO;
transfer or sell any information, functionality or products or services offered on UDIO; or
undertake any other action which is in violation of these terms and conditions (or other terms and conditions and policies referred to in these terms and conditions) or any applicable law.
If UDIO considers, in its absolute discretion, that you or any party related to you (including any agent, representative, contractor or associate) has acted contrary to these terms and conditions or in a manner contrary to UDIO’s interests, then UDIO may immediately terminate your right to access and use UDIO at any time and reserves its rights to take any action it deems necessary or desirable to prevent such repeated action and / or further access to UDIO.
Seems you are a liar....
Why did you delete the truth? I put the terms of Services right from Udio, but you deleted it.
@@rehdogg Sorry? When or why would I delete them? I already added the terms of service above? Is there a problem? I definitely did not delete anything. :)
the problem i have with Udio is that the songs are too short. it generates a legendary 33 seconds.
If you look at Suno and Sonaute it's up to 2 minutes.
that's why Udio is not usable for me (not yet)
and when I see that nothing has changed on Udio in a month, I don't see much to come.
the song length is still the same.
i think and this is legendary my opinion, suno is better followed by sonaut
Um that's simply not true. The initial clip is 33 seconds, but you can then instantly extend the track up to 15 minutes. There's been a huge number of improvements in the last two months too. Including inpainting, clip editing, re-write lyrics, and more. I suspect you haven't looked at it properly recently.
@@NigelPowell i use IT today and it just do 33 sec if ther Something to change it in the freeversion than ok i am wrong but i dont see that i can Change Something so please tell me what to do
@@chesterhill5693 yes the first clip is 33 seconds. Then you select which of the two clips you prefer, and press the Extend button. You'll see it in the track settings or if you click on the three dots. Once you do that, you get a choice of adding a normal extension, or adding an intro or an outro. You can also choose to add your own lyrics, or instrumental or let the app do all the work. Once that extended clip has been created, you can repeat the process until you have the length of track you need. There's a lot of RUclips guides to help if you need. Also check out the featured songs on the front page to get an idea of length etc. Good luck.
Suno (v3.5) is the best in terms of interface and the end result (expectations). BUT the sound quality is RUBISH. If you play it on speakers it's maybe alright. But if you listen on headphones - it's terrible. Way too many artefacts. If you get stems of audio (instruments and vocals), you can hear how terrible channels are. As I understood vocals only in mono, instrumentals are stereo. Udio's sound quality is way ahead. But it's way too random to be usable.
You really should have piped the audio from the websites directly in to the recording, instead of whatever this was. I guess we'll just have to take your word for how they sound.
Yep, pretty pathetic. Apologies.
I think the whole video is AI generated 😂
Oh man, that's such a cruel accusation 😂
Suno es mejor
Lejos!!!UDIO se equivoca con las letras y los ritmos ,algunas veces canta cosas ininteligibles en un ritmo diferente ,si le pides voz femenina la hace masculina le falta mucho!
suno has been the best in my expreience so far, and i've tried many different genre, heck i actually discoverd these "tools" with udio, and whe i tried Suno after, i was blown away ! there's no comparison to me quality wise , suno is clearly amazing while udio is most of the time very underwhelming
That's really interesting. I have found the exact opposite. I started with Suno, but moved over to Udio because of the vastly superior sound quality, and production arrangement of Udio. The new audio upload and clip editing features are just the icing on the cake for me. But to everyone's taste, I guess.
HELP; I'm trying to develop the aggrobass music genre into a living scene. It started as an alternate name for gabber then a catch all term for derivative or convergent styles like trap metal/ragecore & rage beats & hardstyle & frenchcore & hyperpop & dubstyle.
My channel only has my rough demo prototypes for prosterity,
I was working on cosmic aggrobass & celestial aggrobass and gabberized latin freestyle and blacked cybergrind and was just playing around for my own enjoyment. I don't think i have the leadership & networking & production skills to do it,
So I'm proposing that role be given to the person that is looking at comments in music ai videos and reads this down to the bottom where it switches to trigger words
You are now being programmed 🚿🧠🚿🧠🚿🧠🚿🧠🚿🧠🚿
Plotinus, Marcus Aurelius, monad, source, consciousness, logos, ein soph, pneuma, shekinah ;;; mouse utopia; fourth turning, eden, nephilim, babel, sodom, mystery Babylon;;; theosis, star hexahedron, acosmic panentheism,
I gave Udio a try, by curiosity… I am not too concerned about the future as far as music creation is concerned. What these sophisticated tools produce is uninteresting recycled pieces of music. It’s like the filler material we produce out of recycled products. That’s all it can do really… it rehashes what already exists. No surprise is possible with this approach. It will get better for sure, but it will still just be recycled music at the end of the day. AI is incapable of intuition and originality. Some say it is a matter of time… maybe, but for the foreseeable future, there won’t be any real intelligence in AI.
Interesting, and I agree to a point. But there are clear cases of reports from AI researchers where emergent behaviors have been observed from AI which were completely unexpected. I have noticed some very surprising things from Udio that I never expected, such as strange but pleasant rhythm or vocal patterns. You're right, at the moment it's very basic and rudimentary, but I think we have to remember that this music platform is only some five months old!! Basically a new-born.
Udio Sounds you can Not use commercial loud answer from them you have Not the right for IT from them !
Incorrect.
Udio ist the badest muaic Service alone the Sound quality ist the badest they i have heard ... 🤦👎
ruclips.net/video/sa1vCRM13Ms/видео.html
Udio Is Not A Real Program It is a scam
16 Hours and Can not make a single song but ask for money to upgrade ? Scam not Bata Udio is Suno music used to steal money
That's actually absolute RUBBISH! Not sure what you're taking, but maybe you should change the prescription?
You're talking out of your ass.
@@NigelPowell Nontalent !
@@MikkelGrumBovin Agree