9rh9 well you have two choices: compassion or staying above a 3.0. keep the idiots - change your mindset. They may well provide some light hearted relief in the years to come 🦦
I don't see people on the right as idiots. I don't understand how people can't see that when they escape poverty they change their mind about people affected by inequality. I experienced homelessness as a child, was raised in poverty, and my family made it to working class after I was out of high school. And I went on to get both an undergraduate and law degree back when college was affordable. But at least I know times have changed. I've also never flipped over to seeing the meritocracy as fair nor have I blamed poor people for being poor. I've seen how the US has become a service economy and how wages have stagnated from the 70s. If I can see this, why can't people on the right? I don't get the need to put one's self above others. To believe that it's all our own doing-- that every person is an island and deserving of the bad things that happen in life (that is, until it's their kid standing in front of a judge) --, and so everyone should be able to do the same to escape poverty. Reality is... we're not all starting from the same point even if we start from the same financial point. You've not explained how the privilege left and right can think so differently because based on what you said, the privileged on the left, like me, should believe as people on the right do because we're privileged. (Even when we climb out, and yes, I've witnessed that phenomena-- turning one's back on the poor and blaming them --repeatedly.) That's evidence that a change in status brings about a change in what we think is not "everybody." Same would be true of people privilege from the beginning who look at the societal causes of poverty. I look at issues in terms of how they will affect the poor and working classes and not my pocketbook. When it comes to voting, I don't need to vote for politicians who are pandering to me because I don't need an extra leg up and I'm pretty certain my needs will be taken into account. Who won't be taken into account are the poor and working classes. Society benefits when we take care of all of our members by ensuring opportunity. As someone on the left, I want opportunities for people on the right, their kids, and their grandkids. I want to tackle climate change for them and theirs. The worsening financial divide makes jumping between classes much more difficult. How do people on the right think inequality is bad and yet also think people on the left are the threat and talk as if poverty is a You problem and not an US problem? You've given me nothing to figure out how to talk about this to people on the right who seem to dismiss me out of hand because they so often seem to believe that poverty is a personal moral failing. (At least, that's the sort of biased thinking I hear in comments when I try. to talk about these issues.)
Aylbdr Madison well he is right about wanting when people have different opinions station the other person is wrong and he’s right of a common ground it needs to be felt because look at the comment section all of us have different opinions and different disagreements but we actually listen to what each order has to stay we might learn something
@@k.flippitybippity1210 Yes, Reality happens outside of human consciousness, BUT, for a person, reality is what your brain tells you is true, that's why you can see in some illusions a color to be red, but its orange, your reality is "your brains version/interpretation of reality" that's why humans are constantly fooled by magic tricks coz brains sucks at interpreting what's happening in reality
The fantasy is you think legalities keep people from doing drugs. Your beyond incorrect and parts of the world that adopt the idea prove you wrong. Reality is for people who can't face drugs. - Tom Waits
Perhaps a threat to the US is that people keep putting any hope in either Democrats or Republicans to bring the sustainable change we need on this planet.
Saying having an _agenda_ is bad is like saying having an _idea_ is bad, or having a _schedule_ is bad. An agenda is simply a matter, or list of matters to be discussed. Now if someone has a _hidden agenda,_ that's another matter entirely, because purposefully misleading others is wrong. If you think of it, then a *real* agenda can actually be a good thing.
Aylbdr Madison I didn't think I needed to break down what I mean when using the term "agenda." I'm aware of the definition. Hidden agenda is what I am saying.
We're all stronger as a team than we are divided and bickering over the few scraps those in power toss at us like meat to dogs kept in cages. We are being purposefully divided by a government run by corporate interests. Very few of us benefit, and things keep getting worse because they succeed in getting us to fight each other instead of demanding change for the good of all. Most people only wish for peace and prosperity. But for the wanton greed of some few, we could *all* have peace *and* prosperity.
I think many do share the same opinion. Unfortunately, most people falsely see even obvious signs of strength such as compassion and introspection as weaknesses. Therein lies a major part of our struggle. It takes some amount of wisdom to see such things clearly. If only they taught wisdom in schools. Personally I think that should be the most important subject of all.
Aylbdr Madison I don’t think that should be the main subject at school is it should be Tash I’m not saying you shouldn’t but in my opinion because I’m blind and visually impaired the stuff that should be taught in school is what is mental health struggles with mental health team addictions cyber bullying I am smart phone craze and obviously life skills and communication and social skills
The problem is not in a coldie the problem is is that there is no one there to guide these people to tell them - you have the right to this you have the right to - that’s the problem and people listen to much to politics they get scared and they lose fate that’s the problem
Hegelian Dialectic. We have been conditioned by our culture to see conflict and division before we see harmony or unity. We focus in on our differences and instigate conflict without thinking first. For too many in the U.S. its about Blue Team loyalty or Red Team loyalty with closed minds.
Both teams are mistaken and more often flawed than not because to a greater extent both are driven by fear/greed. It is capitalism run amok without a democracy to keep them in check. This is why there are only 2 parties, and we could even end up with one party, even in name (we already have a one party system run by corporate interests, two sides of the same coin). I've been around long enough to see that the democrats are like what the republicans used to be, and the republicans have have jumped off the deep end. Both are just facets of the right wing now. The only difference is in the extremity of just how far right they are willing to admit to being. Many of them even switch _"sides"_ regularly as if there wasn't much of a difference. It's all an act, and a very bad one at that. Most of the rest of the world laughs now at *America's Reality Show Politics.* I completely agree with the conditioning you mention. Divide and conquer is the oldest tactic in the book, and it's a tactic that has been used against the common human for many many thousands of years. Anything and everything from classism and monotheism, to racism and ageism are all division tactics the power seekers of the world purposefully incite in the common world citizen in an effort to maintain their own power and control over us all. This is why such talks are incredibly important to us all.
Bless you for being strong enough to admit you could be better. No one is infallible. I was just typing how I strongly believe that introspection is the greatest quality any human can posses. Because through that one quality, all other positive qualities can be found. That said, I should finish watching the video to try to gain some introspection for myself as well. Thank you for setting such an excellent example. Yours is the best comment I've read so far, and I've read a few really good ones already too. ^-^
The idea that prehistoric foragers were egalitarians is mistaken because their wealth was honor and they fiercely competed for honor and their welfare varied with their honor. Their honor was a reward for their merit, so they were meritocracy's.
yes, but both solution less government and more government can be use to deal with this problem. Less government : Abolish the patent system so there is no oligopol on insulin. More government : Regulate what prices are. Both are valid points.
@@transon6655 in my experience the "less government" option is often sponsored by pharma corporations and therefore sounds more like "less control, less regulations, less transparency"
Simon Mustermann the fact that it is sponsored by cooperation doesn't decide if it is a good or bad policy. There are enough policy which are sponsored by cooperations.
@Tran Son : The problem is that capitalism without democracy only encourages greed and unsustainability. This is doubly true of corporations. Not only that, things are further skewed and made even less sustainable through the fact that the richest among us can just buy the laws that allow them to grab up even more wealth and power, while screwing the rest of us out of what little hard earned prosperity we've managed to attain. You said: _"There are enough policy which are sponsored by cooperations"_ and on that point I can agree, although I think you meant to say: _There are enough _*_good policies_*_ which are sponsored by corporations._ If so, in my estimation that would be an unwise assumption at best. To be clear, I'm not saying you are not smart or that I am smarter. We all have our own strengths and weaknesses, and I am open to debate on anything I say as well. I take pride in the fact I actually will fact check myself somewhat often, and find that sometimes I am wrong too. We're all human and no human is even remotely infallible. I wish you (and everyone else) peace and prosperity. ^-^
Aylbdr Madison A policy is most often relative good, there are no good for all. If it helps someone it will most often hurt someone else. Which is why I don't like cooperation sponsoring policies. But I subcribe to limited government so they don't have the incentive to bribe politician. I don't subcribe to the view to expand government so they can redistrubute wealth so rich people can't bribe politician because if there are no super rich people then there will be middle rich people who will bribe the politicians who have even more power now.
@@Zex-4729 My original comment was obviously not meant to be of academic nature, but what I meant was basically respecting each other when every side has a _genuine viewpoint._ One that obviously _isn't_ contradicting *facts,* we're talking about *opinions* here.
I find his point misleading because he’s basically saying that the poverty or the poverty poor people can speak up for themselves then in that case why are they on this planet yes I know it’s the people that are better off - two more people but pleased to find the term better off because I don’t think I’m better off I’ve had depression and in my opinion that’s not better off and wanting that need to be looked into it’s just because you have more wealth than people doesn’t mean you’re not happy
Now, if we can get people to do what the title says and follow through when they don't get 100% of their way, we'll be good to go! Expediant compromise, for the good of the local and national communities.
BE AN INDIVIDUAL!!!!! DO NOT COMPARE EVER WITH SOMEONE ELSE!!!! KEEP IT SIMPLE USE COMMON SENSE THE WORLD IS MISSING PLENTY OF IT!!! LOOK AT NATURE IT MIGHT CHANGE THE WAY YOU FEEL!!!!BE HAPPY WITH WHAT YOU HAVE!!!!......BE TOLERANT OF THE INTOLERANT!!!! LIFE IS NOT FAIR, DO THE BEST JOB YOU CAN ON A DAILY BASIS!!!! DON"T DEPEND ON GOVERNMENT HAND OUTS!!!! THE BEST GOOD LUCK IS THE ONE YOU PLAN!!!! LIFE IS NOT A MIRACLE...DO NOT WORRY IF SOMEONE DISAGREE WITH YOU!!!! YOU MAKE YOUR OWN TAIL WINDS!!!
That thinking only works if you believe all humans as individuals or groups are born equal. Interestingly, as said at the beginning of the talk, democracy & neoliberalism and their ideals are linked with the most extreme discrepancies in wealth, while they pretend to fight against.
old joke: The Baptist believed that we have to be Baptists and Republican to get into heaven and the Methodist believed that we have to be Methodist and Democrat to get into heaven.
That's rich, using TED as platform for this. There was no idea worth spreading around these parts in a very long time. For crying out loud, they had a speaker the other day who suggested that there should be no standards and that museums should not be only for exceptional. And than there was another one, giving a speech about how we should give same HUMAN right to rivers and streams. Being a Professor of Psychology and Neuroscience, please explain to me what should I think of these idiots?
this talk really struck a chord for me. it's so easy to demonize people who disagree with us. but the truth comes up after common ground. the talk also made me sad about the lack of humility by the many who are proud. delusional well-off people often lack empathy for the suffering of the many (poor) - and that is the tragedy. depressing even.
I feel like this title is a bit misleading for what the talk actually was about
Yeah a little bit.
Mitchell Clark its about changing your mindset its not a tutorial IMO
Yes! So how DO I get rid of my friends who keep disagreeing with me like idiots.
9rh9 well you have two choices: compassion or staying above a 3.0. keep the idiots - change your mindset. They may well provide some light hearted relief in the years to come 🦦
exactly my thoughts...I thought he would have more of a framework around thinking about those that disagree with us.
I don't see people on the right as idiots. I don't understand how people can't see that when they escape poverty they change their mind about people affected by inequality. I experienced homelessness as a child, was raised in poverty, and my family made it to working class after I was out of high school. And I went on to get both an undergraduate and law degree back when college was affordable. But at least I know times have changed. I've also never flipped over to seeing the meritocracy as fair nor have I blamed poor people for being poor. I've seen how the US has become a service economy and how wages have stagnated from the 70s. If I can see this, why can't people on the right? I don't get the need to put one's self above others. To believe that it's all our own doing-- that every person is an island and deserving of the bad things that happen in life (that is, until it's their kid standing in front of a judge) --, and so everyone should be able to do the same to escape poverty. Reality is... we're not all starting from the same point even if we start from the same financial point.
You've not explained how the privilege left and right can think so differently because based on what you said, the privileged on the left, like me, should believe as people on the right do because we're privileged. (Even when we climb out, and yes, I've witnessed that phenomena-- turning one's back on the poor and blaming them --repeatedly.) That's evidence that a change in status brings about a change in what we think is not "everybody." Same would be true of people privilege from the beginning who look at the societal causes of poverty. I look at issues in terms of how they will affect the poor and working classes and not my pocketbook. When it comes to voting, I don't need to vote for politicians who are pandering to me because I don't need an extra leg up and I'm pretty certain my needs will be taken into account. Who won't be taken into account are the poor and working classes.
Society benefits when we take care of all of our members by ensuring opportunity. As someone on the left, I want opportunities for people on the right, their kids, and their grandkids. I want to tackle climate change for them and theirs.
The worsening financial divide makes jumping between classes much more difficult. How do people on the right think inequality is bad and yet also think people on the left are the threat and talk as if poverty is a You problem and not an US problem?
You've given me nothing to figure out how to talk about this to people on the right who seem to dismiss me out of hand because they so often seem to believe that poverty is a personal moral failing. (At least, that's the sort of biased thinking I hear in comments when I try. to talk about these issues.)
Honest disagreement is often a good sign of progress.
Debating is healthy when civility is observed.
Aylbdr Madison well he is right about wanting when people have different opinions station the other person is wrong and he’s right of a common ground it needs to be felt because look at the comment section all of us have different opinions and different disagreements but we actually listen to what each order has to stay we might learn something
It's not people who disagree with me, it's people who disagree with reality.
And by reality, you mean "Reality according to you"
@@mediadon6545 No. Reality happens outside of human consciencesness
@@mediadon6545 no , objective cold hard FACTS ..
@@k.flippitybippity1210 Yes, Reality happens outside of human consciousness, BUT, for a person, reality is what your brain tells you is true, that's why you can see in some illusions a color to be red, but its orange, your reality is "your brains version/interpretation of reality" that's why humans are constantly fooled by magic tricks coz brains sucks at interpreting what's happening in reality
@@mediadon6545 but u just said the same thing as your first comment....
Awesome presentation, thank you for sharing.
I got to chat with Dr. Payne a few times during this event and he was really cool. Glad to find his talk online!
Ending the war on drugs would be a good place to start fixing extreme inequality
I guess if everyone escapes reality with drugs, we could all just live in a fantasy land. That is such an awesome solution.
The fantasy is you think legalities keep people from doing drugs.
Your beyond incorrect and parts of the world that adopt the idea prove you wrong.
Reality is for people who can't face drugs.
- Tom Waits
@@chrisbroussard4951 if you think that's what would happen if we legalized drugs, IDK what to tell you. This is just beyond incorrect
@@Kyp031 the reality is the war on drugs has created the biggest criminal enterprise in world history.
war on anything never solves anything
Perhaps a threat to the US is that people keep putting any hope in either Democrats or Republicans to bring the sustainable change we need on this planet.
Jim Sherwood Completely. As the saying goes "we are the ones we have been waiting for." Not the politicians with agendas (not all, but many).
Saying having an _agenda_ is bad is like saying having an _idea_ is bad, or having a _schedule_ is bad. An agenda is simply a matter, or list of matters to be discussed. Now if someone has a _hidden agenda,_ that's another matter entirely, because purposefully misleading others is wrong. If you think of it, then a *real* agenda can actually be a good thing.
Aylbdr Madison I didn't think I needed to break down what I mean when using the term "agenda." I'm aware of the definition. Hidden agenda is what I am saying.
We're all stronger as a team than we are divided and bickering over the few scraps those in power toss at us like meat to dogs kept in cages. We are being purposefully divided by a government run by corporate interests. Very few of us benefit, and things keep getting worse because they succeed in getting us to fight each other instead of demanding change for the good of all. Most people only wish for peace and prosperity. But for the wanton greed of some few, we could *all* have peace *and* prosperity.
Excellent!!! I will listen to this several more times.
Very true, unless you're in a debate with a Flat Earther....
@Ramp Shark Likewise, but perhaps even more so, a Trump derangement syndrome sufferer.
Thanks for a memorable, life changing talk... Totally resonate with your message and my experiences have corroborated your findings.... God Bless You
Very good talk
Truly an Eye-opener presentation. Thank you, Professor !! Cheers
true.
i can only wish many share the same opinion as us.
I think many do share the same opinion. Unfortunately, most people falsely see even obvious signs of strength such as compassion and introspection as weaknesses. Therein lies a major part of our struggle. It takes some amount of wisdom to see such things clearly. If only they taught wisdom in schools. Personally I think that should be the most important subject of all.
Aylbdr Madison I don’t think that should be the main subject at school is it should be Tash I’m not saying you shouldn’t but in my opinion because I’m blind and visually impaired the stuff that should be taught in school is what is mental health struggles with mental health team addictions cyber bullying I am smart phone craze and obviously life skills and communication and social skills
This is amazing. The title is NOT misleading if you listened carefully until the end.
Nice talks to hear.
Great talk!
Great job, Keith!
The problem is not in a coldie the problem is is that there is no one there to guide these people to tell them - you have the right to this you have the right to - that’s the problem and people listen to much to politics they get scared and they lose fate that’s the problem
Hegelian Dialectic. We have been conditioned by our culture to see conflict and division before we see harmony or unity. We focus in on our differences and instigate conflict without thinking first. For too many in the U.S. its about Blue Team loyalty or Red Team loyalty with closed minds.
Both teams are mistaken and more often flawed than not because to a greater extent both are driven by fear/greed. It is capitalism run amok without a democracy to keep them in check. This is why there are only 2 parties, and we could even end up with one party, even in name (we already have a one party system run by corporate interests, two sides of the same coin).
I've been around long enough to see that the democrats are like what the republicans used to be, and the republicans have have jumped off the deep end. Both are just facets of the right wing now. The only difference is in the extremity of just how far right they are willing to admit to being. Many of them even switch _"sides"_ regularly as if there wasn't much of a difference. It's all an act, and a very bad one at that. Most of the rest of the world laughs now at *America's Reality Show Politics.*
I completely agree with the conditioning you mention. Divide and conquer is the oldest tactic in the book, and it's a tactic that has been used against the common human for many many thousands of years. Anything and everything from classism and monotheism, to racism and ageism are all division tactics the power seekers of the world purposefully incite in the common world citizen in an effort to maintain their own power and control over us all.
This is why such talks are incredibly important to us all.
Despite how we look at people at the end of the day they're gonna have look at themselves and move on
Absolutely Facts...
11:00 Ha ha, ooops, guilty. But then again i listened to the whole talk because i know i need to do better. Some very good points.
Bless you for being strong enough to admit you could be better. No one is infallible. I was just typing how I strongly believe that introspection is the greatest quality any human can posses. Because through that one quality, all other positive qualities can be found.
That said, I should finish watching the video to try to gain some introspection for myself as well. Thank you for setting such an excellent example. Yours is the best comment I've read so far, and I've read a few really good ones already too. ^-^
The idea that prehistoric foragers were egalitarians is mistaken because their wealth was honor and they fiercely competed for honor and their welfare varied with their honor. Their honor was a reward for their merit, so they were meritocracy's.
Is it possible to look without measurement, to live a life without the shadow of comparison coming into it?
Bravo 👏🏻
The video title is a lie.
Also at 1:03 I think he forgot about public health care. Look at the cost of insulin in the US and other parts of the world.
yes, but both solution less government and more government can be use to deal with this problem. Less government : Abolish the patent system so there is no oligopol on insulin. More government : Regulate what prices are. Both are valid points.
@@transon6655 in my experience the "less government" option is often sponsored by pharma corporations and therefore sounds more like "less control, less regulations, less transparency"
Simon Mustermann the fact that it is sponsored by cooperation doesn't decide if it is a good or bad policy. There are enough policy which are sponsored by cooperations.
@Tran Son : The problem is that capitalism without democracy only encourages greed and unsustainability. This is doubly true of corporations. Not only that, things are further skewed and made even less sustainable through the fact that the richest among us can just buy the laws that allow them to grab up even more wealth and power, while screwing the rest of us out of what little hard earned prosperity we've managed to attain.
You said: _"There are enough policy which are sponsored by cooperations"_ and on that point I can agree, although I think you meant to say: _There are enough _*_good policies_*_ which are sponsored by corporations._ If so, in my estimation that would be an unwise assumption at best.
To be clear, I'm not saying you are not smart or that I am smarter. We all have our own strengths and weaknesses, and I am open to debate on anything I say as well. I take pride in the fact I actually will fact check myself somewhat often, and find that sometimes I am wrong too. We're all human and no human is even remotely infallible.
I wish you (and everyone else) peace and prosperity. ^-^
Aylbdr Madison A policy is most often relative good, there are no good for all. If it helps someone it will most often hurt someone else. Which is why I don't like cooperation sponsoring policies. But I subcribe to limited government so they don't have the incentive to bribe politician. I don't subcribe to the view to expand government so they can redistrubute wealth so rich people can't bribe politician because if there are no super rich people then there will be middle rich people who will bribe the politicians who have even more power now.
By being decent human beings.
@@Zex-4729 My original comment was obviously not meant to be of academic nature, but what I meant was basically respecting each other when every side has a _genuine viewpoint._ One that obviously _isn't_ contradicting *facts,* we're talking about *opinions* here.
I find his point misleading because he’s basically saying that the poverty or the poverty poor people can speak up for themselves then in that case why are they on this planet yes I know it’s the people that are better off - two more people but pleased to find the term better off because I don’t think I’m better off I’ve had depression and in my opinion that’s not better off and wanting that need to be looked into it’s just because you have more wealth than people doesn’t mean you’re not happy
*Liberals and conservatives taking down notes*
Now, if we can get people to do what the title says and follow through when they don't get 100% of their way, we'll be good to go! Expediant compromise, for the good of the local and national communities.
BE AN INDIVIDUAL!!!!! DO NOT COMPARE EVER WITH SOMEONE ELSE!!!! KEEP IT SIMPLE USE COMMON SENSE THE WORLD IS MISSING PLENTY OF IT!!! LOOK AT NATURE IT MIGHT CHANGE THE WAY YOU FEEL!!!!BE HAPPY WITH WHAT YOU HAVE!!!!......BE TOLERANT OF THE INTOLERANT!!!! LIFE IS NOT FAIR, DO THE BEST JOB YOU CAN ON A DAILY BASIS!!!! DON"T DEPEND ON GOVERNMENT HAND OUTS!!!! THE BEST GOOD LUCK IS THE ONE YOU PLAN!!!! LIFE IS NOT A MIRACLE...DO NOT WORRY IF SOMEONE DISAGREE WITH YOU!!!! YOU MAKE YOUR OWN TAIL WINDS!!!
This should have been titled: "Inequality! Therefore you should give more money to the government!"
Motivation is required daily because it doesn't last forever.
What if I don't want to stop?
Politicians are IDIOTS. I could do their job much better!
Oh, but so many of them are....
Great job! You read the title
I need engsub
What's up with North Carolina?
Wasn’t Switzerland the wealthiest nation? 1:09
No one care of speaking facts no more its let just say whatever helps us make our point
Yes, sadly😪
Step 1. Don't
Done
A personality B personality
That thinking only works if you believe all humans as individuals or groups are born equal.
Interestingly, as said at the beginning of the talk, democracy & neoliberalism and their ideals are linked with the most extreme discrepancies in wealth, while they pretend to fight against.
Thank you thank you so much please thank you bye friends thank you
LMAO!!! KEITH YOU TRIPPING!!! I MUST TAKE THAT WORD OUT MY VOCAB!!!
"Appeal to the well off bc they're the only ones who can do something" eh...
I HAVE BEEN WOMDERIMG THIS
Well WOMDER no more..
Nice, but my parents/family and myself did not get a lucky break.
We started poor and studied hard to MAKE that break...
be humble.
you could've just been lucky.
you could've been born somewhere else where u don't have the same opportunities and freedom.
@@rizzamaeong But, in America, everybody has the opportunity to improve themselves.
From the thumbnail, I actually thought it is Adam Sandler and just clicked on it.
@Julia Leon He's an amazing guy
Calling voters “Deplorables” is a good example!
Coronavirus prevent me from seen such kind of people
lmao
In the end he completely discounts activists who have no tailwind
old joke: The Baptist believed that we have to be Baptists and Republican to get into heaven and the Methodist believed that we have to be Methodist and Democrat to get into heaven.
This guy hasn't met some of my coworkers.
LOL
Walks like a duck, talks like a duck, acts like a duck....must be a duck!
Vote for liar number 1 2 or 3.
hello everyone give and take more power
need this lols
Such a profound concept for so many people. There is no one true truth, only our own subjective truth.
That's rich, using TED as platform for this. There was no idea worth spreading around these parts in a very long time. For crying out loud, they had a speaker the other day who suggested that there should be no standards and that museums should not be only for exceptional. And than there was another one, giving a speech about how we should give same HUMAN right to rivers and streams. Being a Professor of Psychology and Neuroscience, please explain to me what should I think of these idiots?
Just stay at home lol
The people giving this video a thumbs-up aren't watching the video.
i gave it a thumbs up.
i also watched it twice.
Footballers are IDIOTS. I could do their job much better!
this talk really struck a chord for me.
it's so easy to demonize people who disagree with us.
but the truth comes up after common ground.
the talk also made me sad about the lack of humility by the many who are proud.
delusional well-off people often lack empathy for the suffering of the many (poor) - and that is the tragedy.
depressing even.
I disagree with that but everybody has their own opinion
If you have an opinion, then state it. Randomly saying you disagree is useless at best to anyone, including yourself.
Saying I disagree to the video is my opinion you jackass
Like from kerala,INDIA
..കമന്റ് തൊഴിലാളി കീ....
6398
My parents are IDIOTS, I could do their parenting much better!
We may not achieve 100% equality as humanity, but I believe that we will be able to reduce that huge gap that exists today.
Let’s take the money of those 8 wealthiest individuals and give it to those who know what’s best for the rest of us.
I'm sorry, but the U.S.A is not the lost unequal, just go to any developing country