Good video would be interesting to hear about countries outside the EU As the UK has left the EU where do the UK stand in regards to legislation and policy regarding financial crime?
@nattts2095 Thanks for the comment. Tomorrow we are publishing the Banking Secrecy Act which is the US regulation. Hope that one is ok for you 🙂 We shall do the UK in a later date
Thank you for creating this video, very useful information. A bit of feedback with respect, the voice is so high pitched it sounds like the content is created for kids instead of an adult audience.
@Shanti Shanti Thanks for the comment and feedback it is always well received. The EU Directive video is over 2 months old and since then we have improved the quality of the audio in order to bring our audience a better experience. 😉 Hope you notice the difference on the newer videos.
the only way for not be corrupted the comission who gonna work and what country it gonna live is everyone who work in that estruture cant know the other one and each one of them studie the other one work, and every guy could be on in diferent countries and never know the other just by a number, even the number couldnt be static, is the only way inspectors of that new organization being isent of corruption 90% because any computer can be hacked but it is a start.
..a little confused my text but what i want 2 say is, in that new struture the inspectors fighting european money laundry cannot know the other one, and each guy need to judge the other one without knowing who work he is judging, and maybe should be independent inspectors from every country of europe for never benigna excuse for some country dont accept it, that new organization have 2 be almost 100% credible and for that just nobody ínside knows the partner and what relatory he is reading and judgeing, every work should be analyzed by another (country, inspector, NUMBER) maybe is more slow like that but more credible that dont gonna be in criminal actions too after a few years , even the numbers of those financial inspectors could be fixed and always rolling every week for nobody knows who is who and who analyse who, and new laws for the new job created like double years in jail if the inspectors being corrupted than the corruption people they are fighting..but every work have 2 be analyzed by another ghost number country inspector if not dont spent more money and time doing some zero organization..
Good video would be interesting to hear about countries outside the EU
As the UK has left the EU where do the UK stand in regards to legislation and policy regarding financial crime?
@nattts2095 Thanks for the comment. Tomorrow we are publishing the Banking Secrecy Act which is the US regulation. Hope that one is ok for you 🙂 We shall do the UK in a later date
Thank you for creating this video, very useful information. A bit of feedback with respect, the voice is so high pitched it sounds like the content is created for kids instead of an adult audience.
@Shanti Shanti Thanks for the comment and feedback it is always well received. The EU Directive video is over 2 months old and since then we have improved the quality of the audio in order to bring our audience a better experience. 😉 Hope you notice the difference on the newer videos.
Great
Thank You 👍
the only way for not be corrupted the comission who gonna work and what country it gonna live is everyone who work in that estruture cant know the other one and each one of them studie the other one work, and every guy could be on in diferent countries and never know the other just by a number, even the number couldnt be static, is the only way inspectors of that new organization being isent of corruption 90% because any computer can be hacked but it is a start.
..a little confused my text but what i want 2 say is, in that new struture the inspectors fighting european money laundry cannot know the other one, and each guy need to judge the other one without knowing who work he is judging, and maybe should be independent inspectors from every country of europe for never benigna excuse for some country dont accept it, that new organization have 2 be almost 100% credible and for that just nobody ínside knows the partner and what relatory he is reading and judgeing, every work should be analyzed by another (country, inspector, NUMBER) maybe is more slow like that but more credible that dont gonna be in criminal actions too after a few years , even the numbers of those financial inspectors could be fixed and always rolling every week for nobody knows who is who and who analyse who, and new laws for the new job created like double years in jail if the inspectors being corrupted than the corruption people they are fighting..but every work have 2 be analyzed by another ghost number country inspector if not dont spent more money and time doing some zero organization..
@Insano Insano thanks for the comment