R v Turnbull 1977

[@josephusplutocrat4550]

Thank you very much..🥰

[@AshaEll]

Thank you, this was very helpful for a law assignment

[@caselawexplained7319]

Thanks PD - glad it helped!

[@Lxuren17]

Thank you! This helped me so much with my essay.

[@caselawexplained7319]

Glad that it did Lauren - thanks for letting me know

[@anushkaanushka9443]

Thank you. Very helpful and well explained.

[@caselawexplained7319]

Thank you Anushka

[@char8842]

this has been so helpful, thank you!

[@caselawexplained7319]

Thanks Char - that's good to know!

[@ratuvesikula6631]

Thank you very much sir, really helpful

[@caselawexplained7319]

Thanks Ratu

[@conish64]

Of course we've had identification warnings in Ireland since AG v Casey in 1963 as well as a bespoke Galbraith test when it comes to such evidence. Far be it from the English courts to have even the slightest regard to the jurisprudence of its closest common law neighbour, even when we've considered precisely the same issues and arguments often only a few years previously.

[@caselawexplained7319]

Not having 'even the slightest regard' may be a little harsh as the Turnbull ruling mirrors substantially the recommendations of the Devlin Committee (Lord Devlin being a senior member of the judiciary of Eng & Wales) which did consider the situation in Ireland including the case of Casey (Appendix L to the Report refers). See chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/228523/0338.pdf

[@shakale6287]

Can I get a copy of that document that you are reading?

[@caselawexplained7319]

I am afraid that went in the waste bin a long time ago.

[@shakale6287]

@@caselawexplained7319 can I get any judgment on poor identification and fabrication?

[@caselawexplained7319]

@@shakale6287 Turnbull is such a case, as are the two cases heard with it R v Roberts and R v Whitby

[@shakale6287]

@@caselawexplained7319 thanks I'll try to get them and read it