[@shamiliqbal2979]

This is what I am looking for. Took a lot of screen shot for reference. Thanks a lot.

[@lazarorogeriodasilva6387]

Very good explanation, thank you so much

[@knowledgefactory-leansixsi2123]

Thanks

[@tuanpham9600]

Perfect explain, thanks so much

[@knowledgefactory-leansixsi2123]

Thanks

[@ዘተርቢኖስ]

Execellent and great ! but Too much limited, and can't for beginner

[@iman1983ify]

EXCELLENT .

[@knowledgefactory-leansixsi2123]

Many thanks!

[@tutran5216]

good knowledge, and Perfect explain. thanks so much. Btw, could you mind sharing this file?

[@agradhanurwedhasakti4865]

Great explanation, however, I am still confused on the "repeatability" part. Both Type1 Gage Study and Gage R&R determine the repeatability, is there any difference between the Type 1's repeatibility and the GR&R's repeatability?

[@ciconsultingservices]

A Type I Gage Study measures "pure" variability from the measurement device by taking repeated measurements on the same part.
If the Type I Gage Study is not acceptable, then the MSA result will not be acceptable, so a Type I Gage Study should be done first to save time.
If the Type I Gage Study is acceptable then you can do a MSA that takes into account the variability due to the device, the environment, the procedure, the parts, and the operator - all parts of the measurement system.
When evaluating an MSA for repeatability, it gives you an indication of how the system performs, not just the measurement device.