♍ Virgo Psychic Tarot ♍ This person👿 never intended to uphold this contract. How to heal & learn 🙌
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 18 сен 2024
- SCHEDULE PERSONAL READING WITH ME HERE: www.wingspirit...
CARDS USED:
Tarot of Mystical moments
Vice Versa Tarot
OFFICIAL SOCIAL MEDIA ACCOUNTS
TikTok - / wingspiritualclar
Instagram - / wingspiritualclarity
Facebook - / wing.clarity
RUclips - / @wingspiritualclarity1233
Patreon - www.patreon.co...
**LEGAL DISCLAIMER** All of my readings are for entertainment purposes only. My readings are NOT a substitute for medical or professional advice. Make sure to use your own intuition and discernment during these readings.
Thank you amazing reading , and so amazing how all Virgos feeling same way, I went through the hell to get to the light, Congratulations all Virgo love and light , blessings .
Very accurate. However, I would describe him as a narcissist, not a codependent. Narcissists love bomb and lie.
spot on, you are a beautiful wise reader who really helps!
Holy hell. 1000% accurate. Very validating. You just won a subscriber. She was my karmic contract.
Thank you, for sharing with us. This is definitely a reading that resonates 100%. It was difficult to listen to because it's the truth. I cried healing tears. This is exactly what happened & it continued for 15 years. We were married. Towards the end, I kept thinking he was sent to kill me slowly. He did chip away at me & also my son. Prior to my marriage, I went through relationships that were also brutal. All of them ended in abandonment. First, was just a few years but he was my first love. He moved away for work. I was devastated. Second, was 7 years. He abandoned me when I was 6 months pregnant. He left us for someone else & moved to Colorado. Third was around 7 years. Engaged, bought property, moved & he thought the grass was greener. Fourth, I waited to get married until I was 50 because I wanted it to be special & last. This marriage was full of deep deception. I felt like I was in a fog. I'm now learning he had lied to me since day one. He has also taken material things, money & chipped away at me. Just like you said. I gave 95%. He gave 5% on a good day. Got really bad in '21. Yes, he has childhood wounds. You & a couple other readers have gone deep into his psyche to help me understand. Thank you, for that.
This past March, we agreed to separate but he made the decision to run & ghosted me. Yes, another abandonment. In August, I got notified he passed on 8/7. I'm finally free to clear & heal. Yes, the wasted time is bothering me. Also, keep asking why did I stay so long. Yes, I have deep Mother wounds. She never expressed love & wasn't nurturing. I also took my vows seriously. It seems God knew it could only end by "death do us part".
I'm now seeing my son go through an extremely toxic relationship. It has all the red flags. I can't bear to see him go through this. It's triggering. I've told him this. He saw what I went through & experienced most of it with me. I don't know how to handle this because he lives with me. Your kind comforting advice helped in this reading. I really do need clarity & advice. I have a handful of readers I watch. They've definitely tapped into my situation. I'm thankful they have because I need sincere direct clear cut answers. This hurts really bad but I want to move on. If any other Virgos are also going through something similar, I sincerely have compassion for you. It's extremely painful. Ty, to the channel owner! You've helped me a lot. 🐦🐦
You have helped me so much,in my mind and my spirit.
I've made the changes within me and still my environment is very flat, cold, detached all the while manipulative and quite honestly unhinged, outside of my home and that keeps me caged so to speak. The beauty in it is I have come to conclude it's time to relocate for different and I hope it's better, offers room to grow with less eyes on me watching to see what move I make next as that part has become exhausting. Like my own personal paparazzi lol!
ML ❤
I absolutely love what you said. As far as their feelings and opinions are not my responsibility. I've always felt like oh I have to convince this person who's saying I'm this or that. Some kind of a negative opinion or feeling. I always felt like oh I have to convince them that I'm really a nice person. Then I'm not that bad or whatever it is that they think I am. And by you saying that it really helps me to see that just because they have their perspective doesn't mean that it's reality and I can't control their perspective or convince them otherwise. And I I can stop wasting time. Trying to sway a person who is only in my way and not even using constructive criticism. Just coming up with things without even knowing me. I'm going to try to keep that in mind. I didn't expect it to be from someone who was a relationship partner. I think that's how I got blindsided was believing that someone was on my team before I actually did the fact checking.❤ Thank you! It was an eye-opener.
Good morning! Hope you have a wonderful day ☀️ Always so accurate and true. Thanks for all you do!
No fake apologies needed I had to get the authorities involved for the safety of my family
Hi is the second time I have watched your work, and you are 100% right. You just put me in a good mood. All my Doubts are gone, thank you for your work,
WENDY, WOW YOU WERE TALKING IN 3 READINGS OVER THE LAST TWO WEEKS EXACTLY ABT EACH INDIVIDUAL IN THE GROUP OF THE THIRD PARTY! IVE BEEN ON A JOURNEY Watching MY VIRGO READING ABT MY INTEREST BORN ON THE DAME DAY AS I SEPTEMBER 20TH SHES 4 YEARS YOUNGER ..ALL MY FEELINGS MY ENERGY AFTER MEETING HER MY INTUITIONS THAT SHE IS/WAS MY SOULMATE EVEN TWIN FLAME. WERE SO MUCH ALIKE TO THE TEE OF OUR INTEREST BUT SHE WOULD NEVER SEE IT THE SAME . TODAYS READING WAS THE Peace I NEEDED TO MOVE ON THANK YOU!
JEFFREY LEE
A manipulative narcissistic person like that has no continuation in my life . People like that just play in your face with a facade..and if it is to the point that they got comfortable with their disrespect and their actions, and take no accountability for their betrayal of my trust, they had to be shown the door.
Soul, I'm not sure of your age but how did you come to this understanding & conclusion? Thanks!
Amazing… my favourite reader yet🙏
You are spot on ... staying due to this person serious illness ! Otherwise would have moved long goo !
Hello just found you ! As they say there are no mistakes… you were spot on . ..and I’Am moving on.😀Thank - you very much❤️
Hey WW!!! Thank you sweet one!!!
All I can say is HOLY MOLY
Thank you, Wendy
Great reading…. Get ready for Libra season Justice …2024…8 Have a great day.
Happy birthday to all virgos we out here enjoying our birthday an dont care about thes readings at all virgos partying out side
Thank you’re amazing 💕🌸xxx
Thank you 🌟
Exactly. It was a lesson.
Virgos is outside with all new peoples
Stole my heart
100% accurate! ❤
Ah man I just went through this…I passed knowledge,had me convinced they back was hurt and I done pretty much everything physically so they wouldn’t ,done what I could with her addiction..etc…I worked around the clock and still noticed red flags and got told it was in my head 😔..I did 🙏 and thought the creator had us cross paths and it was meant to be…She stole any and everything she could from me, even after paying for her attorney and bondsman when she got in trouble ..I’m folding my cards and getting up from the table of love…Yeah I got mom issues and have come to the conclusion that I’m not relationship material…M.G.T.O.W for me now, just done💯
Others wud be wanting them too.they can't give themselves to all they need pple to clear the issue Ain their life ..have you done all yourself..no way yu had your luck your support they had a wicked mom may be a wicked father a wicked sibling .they cud have been misused from years ..if yujatwn to shitty pple you l.nwvwr k ow the reality of anyone because you will see only what is shown to you by these sick women. Nd she is a virgo virgo means CRITICISM remember..sixth house is sickneaa hidden enemies
.nd hidden cud b rt in front yu won't see them as enemy..so stop criticisms of yu helped give nd walk away but do this think they r evil.
Everytime you hell you can't be returned in terms yu wish that's business not love okay?? Stop following these evil.wme of yu tube her sarcasm is clearly HER ..evilish I have noticed u cud have missed
Chances r yu did this to someone in ur last.also. U wanted someone fr urself nd thiabxo tract that you think yu had someone but it's not how the other wanted it is that yu r stuck with because it's your need sometimes or many times a friend is a friend where the physical I timacy how men see is there possible not that they have Intimacy In Their lives it's just they can see the commitment isn't going to be.nd these dumb women in you tube are stuck on ego boosting every single watcher. To earn that bread butter rthey can't get from anywhere else all day they talk shit nd ruin your thoughts further ask women why it feels to men they r heating or .misusing..more than half the pple on this earth r non neglected even the other must have been but all have issues even more serious they r stuck in. Their parents ruined them to not be able to work on their finances nd these pple kept giving to all they came across ..now yu came in yheieife they r liveable others wud b w
@@artivedi3887 I normally would say something along the lines where you would get so but hurt that you would probably delete your account and avoid me like the plague 💯…instead I’m gonna pass on some knowledge so that you may be able to gain understanding…You can fact check the info👍
Reciprocal trust is a crucial component of cooperative, mutually beneficial social relationships. Previous research using tasks that require judging and developing interpersonal trust has suggested that the insula may be an important brain region underlying these processes (King-Casas et al., 2008). Here, using a neuropsychological approach, we investigated the role of the insula in reciprocal trust during the Trust Game (TG), an interpersonal economic exchange. Consistent with previous research, we found that neurologically normal adults reciprocate trust in kind, i.e., they increase trust in response to increases from their partners, and decrease trust in response to decreases. In contrast, individuals with damage to the insula displayed abnormal expressions of trust. Specifically, these individuals behaved benevolently (expressing misplaced trust) when playing the role of investor, and malevolently (violating their partner’s trust) when playing the role of the trustee. Our findings lend further support to the idea that the insula is important for expressing normal interpersonal trust, perhaps because the insula helps to recognize risk during decision-making and to identify social norm violations.
Keywords: Insula, brain lesion, trust, decision-making, social cognition
1. Introduction
The ability to form cooperative, mutually beneficial relationships with others is an integral part of human life. Establishing reciprocal relationships can improve an individual’s success in their career, family, and social life. Moreover, overall quality of life can be greatly affected by one’s ability to work cooperatively with others. To establish cooperative relationships, individuals engage in repeated interactions with one another. Through these interactions they develop an understanding of whether their partner is trustworthy, which informs further interactions. A partner who reciprocates one’s trust can be trusted in the future. However, an inability to reciprocate appropriately can result in adverse outcomes. For example, if an individual trusts an untrustworthy partner, that individual might get exploited. Conversely, if they do not trust a trustworthy partner, they may jeopardize a potentially beneficial relationship.
Successfully engaging in these types of interpersonal exchanges involves many social and emotional processes. During interpersonal exchanges, individuals often must accept rejection, celebrate success, judge the trustworthiness of others, and assess whether their behaviors violate social norms. A brain region that has been strongly implicated in these types of processes is the insular cortex (insula). Insula activity is associated with processes ranging from risk tracking (Preuschoff, Quartz, & Bossaerts, 2008) to social emotions (Singer et al., 2006) to judgments of trustworthiness (King-Casas et al., 2008; Todorov, Baron, & Oosterhof, 2008; Winston, Strange, O’Doherty, & Dolan, 2002). Here, we aim to elucidate the role of the insula in the process of interpersonal trust by studying individuals with damage to this area.
Historically, the insula has been considered an important structure for negatively-valenced emotional states, including pain (Ostrowsky et al., 2002), distress (Kross, Egner, Ochsner, Hirsch, & Downey, 2007), and disgust (Phillips et al., 1997). However, the insula is also involved in emotions and feelings of both positive and negative valence (A. Damasio et al., 2000). For example, individuals with insula lesions show reduced arousal in response to both unpleasant and pleasant visual stimuli, suggesting a role for the insula in affective processes regardless of valence (Berntson et al., 2011). Additionally, the insula is important for social emotions (for a review see Lamm & Singer, 2010), including empathy (Singer et al., 2006) and social rejection (Eisenberger, Lieberman, & Williams, 2003). In line with its involvement in social emotions, the insula is also important for social evaluations. For example, increased insula activation is observed in response to viewing untrustworthy faces (Todorov et al., 2008; Winston et al., 2002). However, increased insula activation is also observed in response to faces of individuals who performed cooperatively in a partnered game (Singer, Kiebel, Winston, Dolan, & Frith, 2004). These findings may point to a general role of the insula in interpersonal trust and distrust, regardless of the direction of this value.
An additional way the insula processes emotions is through its involvement in interoception and perception of feeling states (Craig, 2002). Conscious experience of interoception can influence decision-making (Bechara & Damasio, 2005; A. Damasio, 1996). Notably, individuals with damage to the insula show abnormal decision-making under uncertainty and risk (Bar-On, Tranel, Denburg, & Bechara, 2003; Clark et al., 2008). These findings support a critical role for the insula, and the emotional processes it supports, in decision-making.
Consistent with the idea that emotions influence decision-making, it is no surprise that insula activity is implicated in many types of decision-making tasks. Functional neuroimaging research indicates insula involvement in economic decision-making tasks including the Prisoner’s Dilemma (Singer et al., 2004), the Ultimatum Game (Sanfey, Rilling, & Aronson, 2003), the Cups Task (Xue, Lu, Levin, & Bechara, 2010), and the Iowa Gambling Task (d’Acremont, Lu, Li, Van der Linden, & Bechara, 2009; Krawitz, Fukunaga, & Brown, 2010). The results from these studies suggest that the insula is involved in risk, risk prediction error (Bossaerts, 2010; Preuschoff et al., 2008), and uncertainty (Critchley, Mathias, & Dolan, 2001). Similarly, in nonhuman primates (Macaca mulatta), the insula encodes expectations of rewards (Mizuhiki, Richmond, & Shidara, 2012).
Given the involvement of the insula in emotions, social judgments, and economic decision-making, we expect that the insula will also play a critical role in tasks that integrate these processes, such as decision-making during a social exchange. The Trust Game (TG) is an economic decision-making task that incorporates a social aspect. The TG is an economic exchange between two players: one player invests their money with another player, and the other player can choose to reciprocate this investment. The amount of money earned by one player is partially dependent upon the reciprocation from the other player. Therefore, by deciding how to reciprocate their investments, players can exhibit trust and/or distrust in their partners. Mutual trust between the two players results in successful economic exchanges (increased profits) for both parties, whereas misplaced trust or distrust results in unsuccessful exchanges. The TG involves multiple aspects of decision-making typically associated with the insula, including assessments of risk, uncertainty, and appropriate social behavior.
Insula activity is often found during the TG. Using a multi-round, multiplayer version of the TG, King-Casas and colleagues (2008) observed insula activation when participants both received and paid small (as opposed to large) investments. They concluded that the insula responds to violations of social norms, i.e., small investments, during these interpersonal exchanges. Using a one-shot version of the TG, van den Bos, van Dijk, Westenberg, Rombouts, & Crone (2009) found greater insula activation when players received small investments from their partners, but chose to reciprocate (as opposed to defect), which suggests that insula activity represents social norm violations. Consistent with the involvement of the insula in interoception, increased insula activation has been observed during TG performance when subjects were physically cold, compared to warm (Kang, Williams, Clark, Gray, & Bargh, 2011). However, other neuroimaging studies of TG behavior have not found insula activation (King-Casas et al., 2005; Krueger et al., 2007).
@@artivedi3887 n the current study, we sought to investigate the role of the insula for normal performance on the TG by studying individuals with lesions to this structure. We used a multi-round, multiplayer Trust Game (TG) to investigate the performance of individuals with lesions to the insula, and contrasted their behavior to that of individuals with lesions outside the insula (brain damaged comparison participants) and individuals with no lesions (healthy comparison participants). We predicted that damage to the insula would be associated with abnormal behavior, i.e., misplaced trust and distrust, on the TG.
2. Method
2.1. Participants
Participants were grouped based on lesion location and included individuals with damage to the insula (INS; N = 11, 7 left hemisphere, 4 right hemisphere; 7 men, 4 women; see Figure 1), brain-damaged comparison participants with focal brain damage outside the insula (and also excluding the amygdala and medial prefrontal cortex, given the potential importance of these structures for TG performance) (BDC; N = 15, 9 left hemisphere, 5 right hemisphere, 1 bilateral; 5 men, 10 women; see Figure 1), and neurologically normal comparison participants (NC; N = 31, 17 men, 14 women). Brain-damaged participants were recruited from the Patient Registry of the Division of Behavioral Neurology and Cognitive Neuroscience of the Department of Neurology at the University of Iowa. NCs were recruited through local advertisements. Participants were screened to ensure that none had general intellectual impairment (as determined by Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale; Wechsler, 2008). Full-scale IQ (FSIQ) in the NC group was estimated using the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (Wechsler, 2001). Although the NC group has a modestly higher FSIQ numerically, there were no significant differences between groups on demographic attributes, including age [F(2, 54) = 0.47, p = 0.62], education [F(2, 54) = 0.54, p = 0.58), and FSIQ [F(2, 43) = 2.42, p = 0.10) (Table 1).
Figure 1
Figure 1
Lesion overlap map of individuals with insula lesions (orange) and brain-damaged comparison participants (blue). Panels a-k depict axial cuts through the insula region. The three panels in the bottom right of the image depict peri- and midsagittal ...
Table 1
Table 1
There are no significant differences between groups on any demographic variables. Values are means (SDs). Handedness: R = right-handed, L = left-handed; FSIQ = Full Scale Intelligence Quotient. Lesion size is proportion of the entire brain.
Brain-damaged participants have been extensively characterized both neuroanatomically and neuropsychologically under the standard protocols of the Benton Neuropsychology Laboratory and the Laboratory of Brain Imaging and Cognitive Neuroscience (Tranel, 2007). As noted, individuals with damage to the amygdala were excluded, as damage to this region may affect performance on the trust game (Koscik et al., 2011). Additionally, individuals were excluded if they scored above cutoff levels for mild depression using the Beck Depression Inventory-II (13). Lesion etiologies differed slightly between groups. For the INS group, all individuals had lesions due to stroke. For the BDC group, the etiologies were: stroke (n = 12), benign tumor (meningioma) resection (n = 2), and resection for medically-intractable epilepsy (n = 1). The INS and BDC groups did not significantly differ in lesion chronicity, [t(12.60)=0.62, p=0.54], or on most neuropsychological variables, including Performance IQ [t(23)=−0.45, p=0.96], Verbal IQ [t(22)=−0.16, p=0.87], Beck Anxiety Inventory [t(14)=0.05, p=0.96], Beck Depression Inventory-II [t(24)=1.49, p=0.14], Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test 30-minute recognition [t(10.62)=−1.83., p=0.13], Wisconsin Card Sorting Task number of categories completed [t(21)=−0.30, p=0.76], Facial Discrimination Test [t(22)=−0.63, p=.50], Controlled Oral Word Association Test [t(23)=−1.25, p=0.22], and Boston Naming Test [t(12.05)=−1.20, p=0.29] (Table 2). All participants provided informed consent before participating in the experiment, following the protocol of the University of Iowa Institutional Review Board.
Table 2
Table 2
Participant groups did not differ significantly on any of the neuropsychological measures. WAIS, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale scores (VIQ, Visual IQ; PIQ, Performance IQ); BDI-II, Beck Depression Inventory-II; BAI, Beck Anxiety Inventory; AVLT - ...
2.2 Lesion Analysis
Neuroanatomical analysis was based on MR or CT images obtained in the chronic epoch of recovery. Each lesion was reconstructed using Brainvox (Frank, Damasio, & Grabowski, 1997) and manually warped to a normal template brain using the MAP-3 technique (H. Damasio, Tranel, Grabowski, Adolphs, & Damasio, 2004; Fiez, Damasio, & Grabowski, 2000). After manual transfer to the normal template space, the template brain was warped to the MNI152 standard 1 mm T1-weighted atlas (Collins, Neelin, Peters, & Evans, 1994; Evans, Dai, Collins, Neelin, & Marrett, 1991; Mazziotta et al., 2001) using BRAINSDemonWarp (Johnson & Zhao, 2009). This transform, from the lesion template to the MNI152 template, was then applied to each of the lesion maps. Lesion maps were then used to create overlap maps, calculated by the sum of n lesions overlapping at any single voxel. In addition to manual selection of participants with focal insula damage from the Iowa Patient Registry, we included only those participants with at least 5% of this structure damaged in our insula-damaged group. This criterion reduces the likelihood that participants have lesions that only peripherally include the insula while ensuring that even small but focal insular lesions are included, given the nature of naturally occurring lesions that do not respect functional or neuroanatomical boundaries (see Gaznick, Tranel, McNutt, & Bechara, 2014; Koscik & Tranel, 2012, 2013).
2.3. Procedure
Participants completed a multi-round, multiplayer version of the Trust Game (TG; King-Casas et al., 2005; Koscik & Tranel, 2011). In the TG, one player is the “Investor” and another player is the “Trustee.” At the beginning of each round, the Investor is given $20. The Investor decides how much of that $20 to keep and how much to give to the Trustee, in whole dollar amounts. The amount the Investor gives to the Trustee is then tripled. The Trustee is then given the same choice. They decide how much of the received money to keep and how much to return to the Investor. The Investor is informed of the Trustee’s decision and a new round begins by the Investor receiving another $20 to divide.
Participants first played the role of Trustee for 20 rounds and then played the role of the Investor for 20 rounds. Between roles, the participants were told that they would “switch roles with the other player.” All participants played against a computer-simulated opponent. During the instructions and the game, the opponent was always referred to as the “other player.” If the participant inquired about the other player’s identity they were told that they would be informed of their identity once the task was completed. All participants played against the same simulated opponent - this opponent responded dynamically in a “Tit-for-Tat” manner to the behavior of the participant (for more details on how this simulated opponent responds
@@artivedi3887 In short…people don’t need to beat on children, especially on the head…the damages are irreversible in most cases and causes one to figure it out through a lifetime so that they can be a positive contributor in society…I do not let what happened to me define who I am…it does comes with positives as welll💯
תודה!
Wow….😥😌okay
😂 I'm back talking on Facebook again 😂 I don't argue, I don't discuss, I tell, I delete and don't say goodbye to the disruptive ones😂 fun & also calling out many people types... basically 😂😂😂 rebuking religion and preachers . Teaching the gospel as well. 2 days..like twenty posts😂😂😂❤❤❤😂😂😂
Exately on point‼️🎯🔝👍🙏 Stunning‼️❣️ Thank You Dear, God Bless You 🙏🌈🎉🍀💐✨️💖💝😘 Lisa M., Italy
I changed my # and address for my families safey
So happy I’m out
Hello, today is my birthday 🎂
What sign do you see from this person with Virgo? Cuz this is definitely resonating with me. ❤
Integration ❤
What marriage I'm already married with children he felt entitled and a liar slandered me
They never helped me in anything
👍
am going away from community. reckon i won’t be missed. i’m to old for this nonsense. now having to sell all my investments probably at a loss. let them.
Nonsence. For me...