Braveheart demonstrates the difference between the tyrannical figure vs a true leader. That authority in itself isn't awful. Otherwise, society would crumble without any sort of boundaries. Also, rest in peace to my father. He passed away not too long before father's day. He believed in righteous authority as a part of national security. He is also the main source of why I value fatherhood in our lives and culture. And I plan to be just as good a father to my kid as he was for me.
It's why I hope a revival of characters like John Carter by E.R. Burroughs could be great way to promote positive masculinity. The problem with authority in the modern day is simply that so many are unfit to lead. Left, right, center or sideways, there is selfishness, decadence, miscomprehensions about the way the world works. In the vacuum left by the scrubbing of positive role models, you get people trying to find masculinity in the digital crackerjack box of "alpha males" or who completely give up and give into their worst selves. And then there's John Carter, a strong, athletic veteran, willing to fight for what he believes in, but who also understands the value of compassion and kindness in a world where such virtues are nonexistent. A man who isn't above being moved to tears by the dedication of his beasts, and who embodies an unashamed romantic spirit so rare in today's world. All virtues which are fast fading from various political sects who just want someone to fight with, as if there is ever just one real-world villain to take down and solve all our problems.
It's more like a responsible and really accountable authority figure, completely detached from the political process, whose function is to protect the people from the excesses of the politicians and bureaucrats. A king of course fills that definition by default, but also a religious figure like a Pope or a Patriarch, they're in office for life, are not put or confirmed by the state and have full access to the public discourse. That's in my opinion the big mistake of the founder fathers, they should have instituted a national american church.
Ideologues always make it about themselves. No matter where you fall in the political spectrum they always hijack the conversation and rant about themselves.
Have you heard of Charles Coulombe? He's a historian and cultural commentator with regards to the Catholic faith he is on "Tumblar House" youtube channel you would have a great collab. You are very similar! With regards to authority, he is a monarchist which is the Catholic political theory we prescribe to. He has a playlist on the subject and you would greatly appreciate it. Keep up the good work!
Part of the draw of anarcho-capitalism and monarchism is that without top down political authority, there'd be much more organic social authority. A big welfare State devalues families, churches, and other real social institutions: substituting natural elites for unimpressive political elites. Charity would come from such organizations without a State, but it may have conditions: like a faith based charity insisting that someone clean up their act, or a general one pushing them to become self-reliant. Unintuitively, collectivist statism creates a society of isolated individuals.
Braveheart demonstrates the difference between the tyrannical figure vs a true leader. That authority in itself isn't awful. Otherwise, society would crumble without any sort of boundaries.
Also, rest in peace to my father. He passed away not too long before father's day. He believed in righteous authority as a part of national security. He is also the main source of why I value fatherhood in our lives and culture. And I plan to be just as good a father to my kid as he was for me.
You touched on a frequently frustrating part of parenthood. Sometimes it doesn't feel like it matters until the Dad says it. 😂😅😂😅🤷♀️
A leader as much in control of himself as in commanding others fits the Shepherd model of Leadership more than tyranny.
It's why I hope a revival of characters like John Carter by E.R. Burroughs could be great way to promote positive masculinity. The problem with authority in the modern day is simply that so many are unfit to lead. Left, right, center or sideways, there is selfishness, decadence, miscomprehensions about the way the world works. In the vacuum left by the scrubbing of positive role models, you get people trying to find masculinity in the digital crackerjack box of "alpha males" or who completely give up and give into their worst selves. And then there's John Carter, a strong, athletic veteran, willing to fight for what he believes in, but who also understands the value of compassion and kindness in a world where such virtues are nonexistent. A man who isn't above being moved to tears by the dedication of his beasts, and who embodies an unashamed romantic spirit so rare in today's world. All virtues which are fast fading from various political sects who just want someone to fight with, as if there is ever just one real-world villain to take down and solve all our problems.
Some would say our biggest problem is a missing king.
It's more like a responsible and really accountable authority figure, completely detached from the political process, whose function is to protect the people from the excesses of the politicians and bureaucrats. A king of course fills that definition by default, but also a religious figure like a Pope or a Patriarch, they're in office for life, are not put or confirmed by the state and have full access to the public discourse. That's in my opinion the big mistake of the founder fathers, they should have instituted a national american church.
Christ is King.
@@dlee645 Amen 🙏
Based. We need a return of Absolute Monarchy. It is the Christian way ✝️🙏
Ideologues always make it about themselves. No matter where you fall in the political spectrum they always hijack the conversation and rant about themselves.
Have you heard of Charles Coulombe? He's a historian and cultural commentator with regards to the Catholic faith he is on "Tumblar House" youtube channel you would have a great collab. You are very similar!
With regards to authority, he is a monarchist which is the Catholic political theory we prescribe to. He has a playlist on the subject and you would greatly appreciate it. Keep up the good work!
Ideologues hate *COMPETING* authority structures. They have *NO* problem with imposing their will and dictats on people when there is no competition.
Part of the draw of anarcho-capitalism and monarchism is that without top down political authority, there'd be much more organic social authority.
A big welfare State devalues families, churches, and other real social institutions: substituting natural elites for unimpressive political elites.
Charity would come from such organizations without a State, but it may have conditions: like a faith based charity insisting that someone clean up their act, or a general one pushing them to become self-reliant.
Unintuitively, collectivist statism creates a society of isolated individuals.
Junta
Monarchy.
@@Richforce1 He was talking about a military rule. That’s the word he was looking for.
@@Eldritchfan I know, I was stating in my opinion something better.
Ruling military junta?