I tried to solve the puzzle using 6 coins but failed even after multiple tries.. Later I watched the solution still was not able to perform the solution live, I watched the solution from the video again and achieved the solution at last. Great explanation, great video, great contents. @logically yours, you rocked again.
A fantastic puzzle, indeed. To solve this, I tried solving it reversed, as the moves were much more limited. For example, the first move would be putting any of these vertices above two other vertices. If I call each vertex in clockwise order A, B, C, D, E, and F, respectively, then I would take A and move it. Moving it so that it only touches 1 coin (which wouldn't be illegal because this is being played in reverse) would not accomplish anything, as it spreads the general shape too thin. That leaves moving it so that it touch B and C or C and D as the only 2 options, and it makes the problem much easier to approach, for me anyway. If we move A so that it touches C and D, we run into a problem. From here, it's important to keep in mind that a legal coin move must start from a coin which touches 2 other coins. A legal move ends with 2 or more coins touching, so that means these reverse moves must start with that configuration. B and F cannot be legally moved, because they only touch 1 coin. Moving D is legal, but it will inevitably leave groups of two or more coins stranded. You cannot make a final move to complete this pattern. Moving C or E does not lead to any configurations where the puzzle could possibly be solved. This means moving A so that it touches C and D is not the correct move. We must move A so that it touches B and C. Moving A so that it touches B and C, we now have to make our second move. This means F is not allowed to be moved. C and D would be legal to move, but this would not lead to a solution. Moving one of these would result in 2 or more coins stranded from the general shape. There is no constructive way to move C that would lead to a solution. You could move D around the general shape so that it is touching B and F, but this leaves the only constructive move- Moving E, as an illegal move because E is only touching 1 coin. It would be pointless to move coin A, because any place where we could move it is a move we could have done for our first move. Moving A again would be a wasted move. This makes B the only coin that can be moved in a way that is constructive. Moving B so that it touches C, D, E, and F fills up a decent gap in the shape, so that is what I decided to try first. After moving B in such a way, we can notice that moving F so that it touches A, B, and C easily completes the puzzle. F is touching two other coins, so this is a legal move. This "unsolves" the puzzle. So then, I did the puzzle in reverse to check my work. Move F so it touches B and E, Move B so that it touches A and C, then move A so that it touches B and F. This is how I discovered this solution, and it seemed to have worked well!
For me it was easier to do it backwards. There's only two steps you can do, and one is clearly a dead-end. And the rule is inverted, you can only move a coin if it's connected to two others.
I found this very simple (did the same moves, but upside-down). Not sure why this would be consider hard/impossible. Given 3 moves you already know that you need to have no more than 2 missing slots in the final hex, so starting point is forced. Then you know it's symmetrical 6-way, so the only coins you need to consider is center, the one off the hexagon. Play it backwards and it's clear how to resolve it, as ONLY possible move is to take any of the 6 and place it to make a 'corner'. No need to try around here at all, as it's all forced on you.
This is a brilliant and frustrating puzzle. I remember this puzzle from when I was young, but I forgot the solution and so I had a lot of fun and bewildered frustration solving it again. I don't remember if I gave up on it the first time, but this time I kept at it because I _knew_ there was a solution. To solve it, I eventually had to give up on thinking logically and just "brute force" the possible first moves. There's essentially only three possible coins to move first, and a very limited number of places to put them. The solution starts off illogically, moving a coin away from a final hexagon position. But then ... aha! It works.
I dont think that suffice the condition... On making *MOVE 2* your upper coin was not touched by 2 other coins(it was having a single touch of just right coin) until you made your *MOVE 3* ...Observations?
They said "slide a coin where it touches 2 other coins" which somewhat implies that the rule only applies to the current coin we are moving and not a already placed coin
That was solid. I figured it out by realizing many option ended up symmetrical. I worked through the possible moves by force, in a way. Considering symmetry, there are only 3 choices for a start move; one for each coin in the bottom row. Try 1 - move the acute corner first. Try 2, move the middle first. Try 3, move the obtuse corner first. I found it is possible to complete it in 4 moves when moving the middle coin first. Then eventually worked out to move the obtuse corner coin first.
By doing this, you will disturb other coins, and if you use magnet to lift it, then it doesn't becomes sliding. Think outside by maintaining constraints . i.e. go outside the box by not destroying the box
Hi Mr L.Y actually a Hexagon only needed 2 moves 1st 2nd coin from the top row moves up on top of the 3rd coin.2nd the 1st coin from the lower row moves up on top of the 1st coin of the top row then form the Hexagon.
That was a really good puzzle. I had to pull out actual coins to try instead of just visualizing. I was able to solve without seeing the solution by identifying the problems i was facing and coming up with solutions along the way. (At 2:21 in vid and writing this, so not sure if same solution) - first problem is making 3 moves means you need at least 3 of the original coins already in their spots, and this is only if all 3 moves build into the hexagon. If you need to remove a piece without putting into it's final place, then tou need to start with 4. - second problem is that you need to remove the "middle" piece of the hexagon before getting to 5 sides or you will not be able to move it without disturbing other pieces. - next problem I started encountering was building the 5th side of hexagon usually did not touch 2 pieces in mostly all arrangements I tried. So, I came up with the idea of "standing" a piece by moving a coin to leave a different coin only touching 1 piece. -this led me to starting to abandon the farthest out corner piece. Then removing the "middle" of my now forming hexagon, and moving that farthest out piece to complete the hexagon. - So, if the coins are numbered 1-3 from top left to right, and 4-6 from bottom left to right. Then, I came up with: * 1 moves to touch 2 and 3 * 2 moves to touch 4 and 5 * 4 moves to touch the 1 and 2 in a hexagon shape.
Another solution is to move the two middle coins simultaneously so they both meet and complete the top part of the circle and then move the coin at the bottom far left to the right so it completes the circle on the bottom!
At any point of time, every coin need not be touching at least two coins. The 'move' actually only consists of sliding the coins such that they touch two other coins after placement. The coins not being moved need not be touching two others.
@@LOGICALLYYOURS You should have included the rule that 2 coins cannot be moved at the same time. Otherwise, it would have been damn too easy, since we have 2 hands to move any 2 coins simultaneously.
there is also other way , in which first coin that is center could be move bt in this case ,it would be feel like we not making it hexagon bt at last it will be hexagon.... step 1: move center coin to the left side touching two coins 2nd step: move the coin up (that is just below of the coin placed by step 1) 3rd step: move the 1st disturbed coin to complete hexagon.... : )
When I wasn't aware of the rules, I said to myself that I only needed 2 moves. After seeing the rules, my 2-move solution ended up breaking one of them... but I did figure out the correct 3-move solution after pausing the video with the rules clearly visible. I just wasn't sure it was correct without fully watching the video because I didn't know off the top of my head whether or not the second move in the 3-move solution would have broken the same rule that was being broken in the 2-move solution I thought of before seeing the rules. Also, I didn't read the video description until after watching the full video. If I had, I may not have gotten arrogant and thought it was possible in 2 moves in the first place. XD
Lol, I did the same! I was like, wait, I did it in 2 moves...something's wrong here! Then I did get it right. I'd missed that it needed to touch 2 other coins :)
I had the same feeling when I first came across this puzzle. But I quickly realized that I must be missing something. Then I read the conditions carefully. That's why I put more emphasis on the conditions with examples :)
Omg my first assumption is correct, i just move my phone to the right a little bit and i tried like this video. I thought it wasn't the answer cus every riddle here is used to have brilliant solutions and i ain't that person. 😊
By moving only two ( 2 ) coins, One at right in top row and one at the middle of bottom row, place these two touching each other and one touching bottom left and other touching bottom right , we should get the desired configuration
After rearranging coins for some time, I finally solved it. But wait! Do it again... ACK!!! I didn’t know how I did it! It took a little while longer, but I figured it out and remembered how I did it.
I got a slightly different solution in that I moved those last two coins simultaneously so that when their final position occurred, they would be touching each other, and each coin will be touching the second coin when they ended up in their final position.
As with others, thumbnail appeared easy, so I clicked to see what the catch was, but ended up not having a great idea of what to do other than only needing to fill 2 slots rather than 3. Good Puzzle, Great Explanation, Amazing video!
I think I solved with a similar method but instead of moving first ball to touch 2 and 3. I imagined moving 6 to touch 5 and 4. Then moved 5 to touch 2 and 3. Then moved 3 to touch 6 and 5 making a hexagon
General essence is this; to create required hexagon, you need, at some point, to have coin, which touches only one other coin. How could this be done, when you can slide the coin only to position, where it touches two other coins(„correct move“)? Well, this rule doesn´t prevent you from LEAVING one inaimate coin in solo touching position, by performing „correct move“. Hence your first move must be such, that leaves one of the coins in „single“ touching position (2:44 - most left green coin)
Would not 2:53 better demonstrate your point about leaving a coin where it touches only one other coin? At this point, the topmost yellow coin touches only one other coin AND it is already in its final position.
Use two fingers to move the coins, and do it in two moves. First move the central coin and hold it aside. Next move the bottom left coin with the other finger. Now simultaneously move both the coins into their required positions on the hexagon. This satisfies all the rules. It isn't mentioned that the first move has to be completed before starting the second move.
Yes, lets bend the rules in order to solve it, because the only way you can solve it is by cheating. Rule is clear: slide the COIN and place it where it touches two other coins. So, the rule clearly says you can't slide two coins at the time. Be fair to yourself, and admit that you are stupid, and don't come here anymore.
@@moozeeck5417 Yeah, so? I'm moving a COIN, one with each finger. I'm not moving two COINS. If it makes you feel any better, you can move one coin, stop, move the other coin, stop, then move the first coin again, and so on. Now you're moving only one COIN at a time. The puzzle doesn't say that the move cannot be paused and resumed. Even the illustration of the solution does it. If you have a problem with it, then state the problem statement more accurately. You say the puzzle is to "solve X without doing Y" and then when someone does it using Z, then you backpedal and say, "Oh, I meant without doing Y *or Z*". Sure, if this kind of puzzle satisfies you, then go ahead and have your fun. The point being that if you come to a puzzle question, and you are satisfied with the "given" solution, then you're not really getting the point of the puzzle. I'm done here, you are free to consider me stupid, just as I'm free to consider you naive.
I thought all coins will be touched with a minimum of two coins but in the second movement, the top coin touched with only one coin so I think there is a very impossible task to complete with a minimum of two touches in every 3 steps.
Number coins on top row as 1,2,3 and bottom row as 4,5 and 6. Now hold three coins numbered 3, 5 and 6 with three fingers and push down also push left so that coins 3 and 5 touches coins 2 and 4. Hope there are no violations of rules.
Thanks Minato. The same thing happened with everyone whom I asked this puzzle personally. My brother was unable to do it even after watching the video :)
@@LOGICALLYYOURS Hey There! I Completed it, With A different Move. Figure 1, 🌕🌕🌕(1st Row) 🌕🌕🌕 (2nd Row) The Circle, from The 3rd Column of the 2nd Row. Move It Downwards, Figure 2 🌕🌕🌕 🌕🌕 🌕 Now, IN the Figure 1, Move The Circle, From the 2nd Column of the The 2nd row Figure 3, 🌕 🌕 🌕 🌕 🌕 🌕 Now, From the Figure 1, Move The Circle, From the 3rd Column of the 1st Row. Figure 4, 🌕 🌕 🌕 🌕 🌕 🌕 Hence, The Required Hexagon, With 3 moves Is Obtained
This logic puzzle was so much tricky. After watching the whole video, I understood how much stupid I am !!😂 Thanks for the elegant solution 👍♥️ But, What's your nationality??
I tried solving it just in my head but gave up after like two minutes. Cut out six little squares (gets the job done) got it first try, altho i already I knew what moves will surely result in failure so maybe i should have just tried a little longer
Came across this puzzle in the Aubrey Maturin series of books where the ship's physician, Stephen Maturin, is also an intelligence agent and uses this as proof of his identification. Very neat!
You should have included the rule that 2 coins cannot be moved at the same time. Otherwise, it would have been damn too easy, since we have 2 hands to move any 2 coins simultaneously.
Solution: First view it sideways, then arrange the coins to a flower or 5 sided shape. From this point you will see that you will only use 3 moves to arrange it.
Actually touching the two coins diametrically opposite to each other and touching the two adjacent coin with third coin ( as picturised in the video) deceived the audience
after the second move, one coin touches only one side.. will it violate the condition given (A move should consist of sliding of a coin and placing it where it can touch two other coins.)?
I tried to solve the puzzle using 6 coins but failed even after multiple tries..
Later I watched the solution still was not able to perform the solution live, I watched the solution from the video again and achieved the solution at last.
Great explanation, great video, great contents. @logically yours, you rocked again.
Wow! You tried it live 👍
@@nandann7500 tell your solution
Sorry i didn't watch the video I only seen thumbnail 🙄
@@nandann7500 😂
You watched thumbnail and entered comment section.
Bhai bhai..🙏
Me 2 coin htakar kar sakta hu
Who else saw the thumbnail and thought that 'I can solve in 2 moves: 😂
It was challenging after 2 conditions but I was still able to make it. 😎
Me😂
MeMe
Meme
Me.
Me
A fantastic puzzle, indeed. To solve this, I tried solving it reversed, as the moves were much more limited. For example, the first move would be putting any of these vertices above two other vertices. If I call each vertex in clockwise order A, B, C, D, E, and F, respectively, then I would take A and move it. Moving it so that it only touches 1 coin (which wouldn't be illegal because this is being played in reverse) would not accomplish anything, as it spreads the general shape too thin. That leaves moving it so that it touch B and C or C and D as the only 2 options, and it makes the problem much easier to approach, for me anyway.
If we move A so that it touches C and D, we run into a problem. From here, it's important to keep in mind that a legal coin move must start from a coin which touches 2 other coins. A legal move ends with 2 or more coins touching, so that means these reverse moves must start with that configuration. B and F cannot be legally moved, because they only touch 1 coin. Moving D is legal, but it will inevitably leave groups of two or more coins stranded. You cannot make a final move to complete this pattern. Moving C or E does not lead to any configurations where the puzzle could possibly be solved. This means moving A so that it touches C and D is not the correct move. We must move A so that it touches B and C.
Moving A so that it touches B and C, we now have to make our second move. This means F is not allowed to be moved. C and D would be legal to move, but this would not lead to a solution. Moving one of these would result in 2 or more coins stranded from the general shape. There is no constructive way to move C that would lead to a solution. You could move D around the general shape so that it is touching B and F, but this leaves the only constructive move- Moving E, as an illegal move because E is only touching 1 coin. It would be pointless to move coin A, because any place where we could move it is a move we could have done for our first move. Moving A again would be a wasted move. This makes B the only coin that can be moved in a way that is constructive. Moving B so that it touches C, D, E, and F fills up a decent gap in the shape, so that is what I decided to try first.
After moving B in such a way, we can notice that moving F so that it touches A, B, and C easily completes the puzzle. F is touching two other coins, so this is a legal move. This "unsolves" the puzzle. So then, I did the puzzle in reverse to check my work. Move F so it touches B and E, Move B so that it touches A and C, then move A so that it touches B and F. This is how I discovered this solution, and it seemed to have worked well!
Yeah, doing a reverse task is what helped me, too.
same
For me it was easier to do it backwards. There's only two steps you can do, and one is clearly a dead-end. And the rule is inverted, you can only move a coin if it's connected to two others.
I came to the same conclusions and "reverse engineered" the answer :)
I did the same🙂.
Adding "if it's connected to two others" only limits the wrong options so it is even harder this way
I found this very simple (did the same moves, but upside-down). Not sure why this would be consider hard/impossible. Given 3 moves you already know that you need to have no more than 2 missing slots in the final hex, so starting point is forced. Then you know it's symmetrical 6-way, so the only coins you need to consider is center, the one off the hexagon. Play it backwards and it's clear how to resolve it, as ONLY possible move is to take any of the 6 and place it to make a 'corner'. No need to try around here at all, as it's all forced on you.
*Thumbnail:* What is taught in class
*Video:* What they ask in exams
This is a brilliant and frustrating puzzle. I remember this puzzle from when I was young, but I forgot the solution and so I had a lot of fun and bewildered frustration solving it again.
I don't remember if I gave up on it the first time, but this time I kept at it because I _knew_ there was a solution.
To solve it, I eventually had to give up on thinking logically and just "brute force" the possible first moves. There's essentially only three possible coins to move first, and a very limited number of places to put them. The solution starts off illogically, moving a coin away from a final hexagon position. But then ... aha! It works.
This was a brilliant puzzle
I dont think that suffice the condition... On making *MOVE 2* your upper coin was not touched by 2 other coins(it was having a single touch of just right coin) until you made your *MOVE 3* ...Observations?
They said "slide a coin where it touches 2 other coins" which somewhat implies that the rule only applies to the current coin we are moving and not a already placed coin
That was solid. I figured it out by realizing many option ended up symmetrical. I worked through the possible moves by force, in a way. Considering symmetry, there are only 3 choices for a start move; one for each coin in the bottom row. Try 1 - move the acute corner first. Try 2, move the middle first. Try 3, move the obtuse corner first. I found it is possible to complete it in 4 moves when moving the middle coin first. Then eventually worked out to move the obtuse corner coin first.
It's one of those things that's much easier to solve when doing it than when thinking about it in your head.
Use a small weak magnet to move the central coin out.
*DONE*
Edit: by the way this is also *thinking outside the box* which he wants!
Me too thought the same 😀😀😀😂😂😂😂
By doing this, you will disturb other coins, and if you use magnet to lift it, then it doesn't becomes sliding. Think outside by maintaining constraints . i.e. go outside the box by not destroying the box
@@vivekkhatri1759 it is just a joke😀why did you take it serious😀😀
@@vibhuvanvibhu6610 I didn't took it seriously bro, I was bored, so I was boring others with my comment 😜
@@vivekkhatri1759 lol
Hi Mr L.Y actually a Hexagon only needed 2 moves 1st 2nd coin from the top row moves up on top of the 3rd coin.2nd the 1st coin from the lower row moves up on top of the 1st coin of the top row then form the Hexagon.
That was a really good puzzle. I had to pull out actual coins to try instead of just visualizing. I was able to solve without seeing the solution by identifying the problems i was facing and coming up with solutions along the way. (At 2:21 in vid and writing this, so not sure if same solution)
- first problem is making 3 moves means you need at least 3 of the original coins already in their spots, and this is only if all 3 moves build into the hexagon. If you need to remove a piece without putting into it's final place, then tou need to start with 4.
- second problem is that you need to remove the "middle" piece of the hexagon before getting to 5 sides or you will not be able to move it without disturbing other pieces.
- next problem I started encountering was building the 5th side of hexagon usually did not touch 2 pieces in mostly all arrangements I tried. So, I came up with the idea of "standing" a piece by moving a coin to leave a different coin only touching 1 piece.
-this led me to starting to abandon the farthest out corner piece. Then removing the "middle" of my now forming hexagon, and moving that farthest out piece to complete the hexagon.
- So, if the coins are numbered 1-3 from top left to right, and 4-6 from bottom left to right. Then, I came up with:
* 1 moves to touch 2 and 3
* 2 moves to touch 4 and 5
* 4 moves to touch the 1 and 2 in a hexagon shape.
Very clever thinking. You followed a perfect strategy.
I did it !!!!! There are total four possible solutions to solve this puzzle. This was very easy.
Sir, thank you for sharing such a good puzzle.
Another solution is to move the two middle coins simultaneously so they both meet and complete the top part of the circle and then move the coin at the bottom far left to the right so it completes the circle on the bottom!
At any point of time, every coin need not be touching at least two coins.
The 'move' actually only consists of sliding the coins such that they touch two other coins after placement. The coins not being moved need not be touching two others.
Your videos always includes thinking out of the box. Love your riddles very much.....❤️❤️❤️👍👍👍👍
Your videos never disappoint us.👍👍👍 keep it up.
Thank you so much 😀
@@LOGICALLYYOURS
You should have included the rule that 2 coins cannot be moved at the same time. Otherwise, it would have been damn too easy, since we have 2 hands to move any 2 coins simultaneously.
@@anuragguptamr.i.i.t.2329 Which part of slide a coin didn't you understand? Since when does "a" coin include sliding 2 at a time?
there is also other way ,
in which first coin that is center could be move
bt in this case ,it would be feel like we not making it hexagon bt at last it will be hexagon....
step 1: move center coin to the left side touching two coins
2nd step: move the coin up (that is just below of the coin placed by step 1)
3rd step: move the 1st disturbed coin to complete hexagon....
: )
When I wasn't aware of the rules, I said to myself that I only needed 2 moves. After seeing the rules, my 2-move solution ended up breaking one of them... but I did figure out the correct 3-move solution after pausing the video with the rules clearly visible. I just wasn't sure it was correct without fully watching the video because I didn't know off the top of my head whether or not the second move in the 3-move solution would have broken the same rule that was being broken in the 2-move solution I thought of before seeing the rules.
Also, I didn't read the video description until after watching the full video. If I had, I may not have gotten arrogant and thought it was possible in 2 moves in the first place. XD
Lol, I did the same! I was like, wait, I did it in 2 moves...something's wrong here! Then I did get it right. I'd missed that it needed to touch 2 other coins :)
The rule I broke when I wasn't aware of the rules was the "no disturbing other coins while moving a coin" rule. :P
@@RemyWillard We're still both rebels doing it in 2 moves! 😄
I had the same feeling when I first came across this puzzle. But I quickly realized that I must be missing something. Then I read the conditions carefully. That's why I put more emphasis on the conditions with examples :)
@@LOGICALLYYOURS It would have taken me a lot longer if I hadn't literally got 6 coins to physically move about! I need props like a child! 😂
Omg my first assumption is correct, i just move my phone to the right a little bit and i tried like this video. I thought it wasn't the answer cus every riddle here is used to have brilliant solutions and i ain't that person. 😊
I got it in one move: right index on middle coin, left index on bottom left one. Move both coins at the same time competing the hexagon at once.
I feel good about succeeding in less than a minute, phew ...
By moving only two ( 2 ) coins, One at right in top row and one at the middle of bottom row, place these two touching each other and one touching bottom left and other touching bottom right , we should get the desired configuration
Harder problems brother..... I liked this one.... Love you.... ♥️
After rearranging coins for some time, I finally solved it. But wait! Do it again... ACK!!! I didn’t know how I did it! It took a little while longer, but I figured it out and remembered how I did it.
Awesome puzzle!! I took 6 coins and solved, that was really interesting. Left top over upper raw, central on its place and complete hexagon. Neat
I was able to solve the problem but in a different way. Your logic puzzles are the best 😊
Thanks for your problems so much! :)
“Hello logical people “ is a very good opening greeting, well thought
I got the trick logically!
And it matched with the solution! 👍🏽
Great video bro!
Happy that I could do it on my own,but nothing is the end,time for next puzzle lol!
No, it's just matter of two moves, just place first coin from second row and second coin on first row above first row of coins.......😎
I got a slightly different solution in that I moved those last two coins simultaneously so that when their final position occurred, they would be touching each other, and each coin will be touching the second coin when they ended up in their final position.
As with others, thumbnail appeared easy, so I clicked to see what the catch was, but ended up not having a great idea of what to do other than only needing to fill 2 slots rather than 3. Good Puzzle, Great Explanation, Amazing video!
I think I solved with a similar method but instead of moving first ball to touch 2 and 3. I imagined moving 6 to touch 5 and 4. Then moved 5 to touch 2 and 3. Then moved 3 to touch 6 and 5 making a hexagon
This puzzle was good just rule out the possibilities and you can get it
It wasn't hard tbh it was manageable
General essence is this; to create required hexagon, you need, at some point, to have coin, which touches only one other coin. How could this be done, when you can slide the coin only to position, where it touches two other coins(„correct move“)? Well, this rule doesn´t prevent you from LEAVING one inaimate coin in solo touching position, by performing „correct move“. Hence your first move must be such, that leaves one of the coins in „single“ touching position (2:44 - most left green coin)
Would not 2:53 better demonstrate your point about leaving a coin where it touches only one other coin? At this point, the topmost yellow coin touches only one other coin AND it is already in its final position.
Use two fingers to move the coins, and do it in two moves. First move the central coin and hold it aside. Next move the bottom left coin with the other finger. Now simultaneously move both the coins into their required positions on the hexagon. This satisfies all the rules. It isn't mentioned that the first move has to be completed before starting the second move.
Yes, lets bend the rules in order to solve it, because the only way you can solve it is by cheating. Rule is clear: slide the COIN and place it where it touches two other coins. So, the rule clearly says you can't slide two coins at the time. Be fair to yourself, and admit that you are stupid, and don't come here anymore.
@@moozeeck5417 There is no such rule that you can't slide two coins, stop posting nonsense.
@@curiouscat9 Yes, there is: slide the COIN... It doesn't say slide the COINS.
@@moozeeck5417 Yeah, so? I'm moving a COIN, one with each finger. I'm not moving two COINS. If it makes you feel any better, you can move one coin, stop, move the other coin, stop, then move the first coin again, and so on. Now you're moving only one COIN at a time.
The puzzle doesn't say that the move cannot be paused and resumed. Even the illustration of the solution does it. If you have a problem with it, then state the problem statement more accurately.
You say the puzzle is to "solve X without doing Y" and then when someone does it using Z, then you backpedal and say, "Oh, I meant without doing Y *or Z*". Sure, if this kind of puzzle satisfies you, then go ahead and have your fun.
The point being that if you come to a puzzle question, and you are satisfied with the "given" solution, then you're not really getting the point of the puzzle. I'm done here, you are free to consider me stupid, just as I'm free to consider you naive.
I solved it just with 2 moves!!
Took me 10-15 mins. This puzzle had the right amount of difficulty.
This was pretty easy. Solved it second try. Took me like one minute
I thought all coins will be touched with a minimum of two coins but in the second movement, the top coin touched with only one coin so I think there is a very impossible task to complete with a minimum of two touches in every 3 steps.
Got question wrong...It says only the moved coin should touch 2 coins...For already placed coins, its not required to touch 2 coins
I _almost_ failed it, gave up until luckily the trick clicked for me. I suspect it's the only solution as it's the exact same way as in the video.
Number coins on top row as 1,2,3 and bottom row as 4,5 and 6. Now hold three coins numbered 3, 5 and 6 with three fingers and push down also push left so that coins 3 and 5 touches coins 2 and 4. Hope there are no violations of rules.
Good one ammar 👍, keep the good work. Took 5min to solve it
Took me about 3-4 minutes to figure this. Really good puzzle
this is amazing!
I tried a lot of times and still didnt get.
The solution stumped me, it was so simple and great.
Thanks Minato. The same thing happened with everyone whom I asked this puzzle personally. My brother was unable to do it even after watching the video :)
@@LOGICALLYYOURS
Hey There!
I Completed it, With A different Move.
Figure 1,
🌕🌕🌕(1st Row)
🌕🌕🌕 (2nd Row)
The Circle, from The 3rd Column of the 2nd Row.
Move It Downwards,
Figure 2
🌕🌕🌕
🌕🌕
🌕
Now,
IN the Figure 1,
Move The Circle, From the 2nd Column of the The 2nd row
Figure 3,
🌕 🌕 🌕
🌕
🌕 🌕
Now,
From the Figure 1,
Move The Circle, From the 3rd Column of the 1st Row.
Figure 4,
🌕 🌕
🌕 🌕
🌕 🌕
Hence,
The Required Hexagon, With 3 moves Is Obtained
I did it but basically upside down to what you did :-) took me a second to realise it was the same as my solution :-)
This logic puzzle was so much tricky. After watching the whole video, I understood how much stupid I am !!😂
Thanks for the elegant solution 👍♥️
But, What's your nationality??
I thought this was easy, I got it pretty quick
Same
I tried solving it just in my head but gave up after like two minutes. Cut out six little squares (gets the job done) got it first try, altho i already I knew what moves will surely result in failure so maybe i should have just tried a little longer
Came across this puzzle in the Aubrey Maturin series of books where the ship's physician, Stephen Maturin, is also an intelligence agent and uses this as proof of his identification. Very neat!
this is the first video ive actually solved after a long time hahaha
You should have included the rule that 2 coins cannot be moved at the same time. Otherwise, it would have been damn too easy, since we have 2 hands to move any 2 coins simultaneously.
As This is shown ,then we can understand, u should ask make a hexagon "with centers "of each coin.
Easy but nice puzzle! ☺️
I would add a rule: Only one coin can be moved at a time. Otherwise there are multiple solutions.
That’s mentioned in the notes of the puzzle statement. Anyways you’re right.
I think in the first move one coin is touching only one coin where it should touch 2 according to the condition.
There's a variant where the six coins start in a triangle, you have four moves, and you can't move the same coin twice.
I hope u listen me
When you used your first move in the solution the left most coin was not touching 2 coins at 2:51 so plz clear my doubt
What is we just slide the two middle coins of both rows and view the arrangement through different orientation?🤔🤔
Solution: First view it sideways, then arrange the coins to a flower or 5 sided shape. From this point you will see that you will only use 3 moves to arrange it.
This was an easy one. I solved it in a few seconds.
Yep. When you lay the coins out, you quickly see that there are only a few distinct moves. The solution space is small.
Phew, that was kinda challenging. But i made it tho.
Woww.. good puzzle 👍👍
I did in slightly different method. It's almost the same but I started from different place.
Really it is tricky sir
I can't believe I solved it visually!
Sir in which interview this question was asked?
He didn't mention that this question is asked in any interview.
Sir from where do you get these questions?
Me:3 moves? Let's see...
Move this here... Move this
here... And also here... Done! EZ!
[Edit]Me after watch the rules:Um...
Actually touching the two coins diametrically opposite to each other and touching the two adjacent coin with third coin ( as picturised in the video) deceived the audience
Why we can't move middle coin at 2.37 and why we can move coin at 2.52 , both are same right?? Someone please explain
I got the solution in about 5 minutes, but I did it upside down, moving the bottom right coin instead of the top left coin.
What if I tolf you that its possible in 1 move, using both hands?
I solved this in the past but forgot how. solved it again by trial and error.
Nice puzzle
I save this in like 5 minutes. It was quite easy.
I can solve in 2 moves, very easy, who else can saw it 🔥
Got it easily. But I’m quite good at puzzles 🧩
By seeing thumbnail,I thought that 2 moves were enough 😅😌
It's such an amazing puzzle. Your videos never disappoint us.
Hurray!!!!!.Got it correct in the first attempt 🤩🤩
It's a most difficult puzzle i had ever solved.
I took an hour but can't solved it even after seeing the solution.
This is one of the easiest puzzle
Brilliant..👌👌
Now I will try with my friends 😅😅😅
Easy I even solved with just looking at the video while scrolling through RUclips in less than 1 min
It did this in 3 moves
After trying 2 times , the third time I was able to do it.....
Amazing Puzzle
after the second move, one coin touches only one side.. will it violate the condition given (A move should consist of sliding of a coin and placing it where it can touch two other coins.)?
yeah I saw that too 🤔
Yayyy i solved before watching solution 🥳🥳🥳
Can I share a puzzle of which I don't have any solution
Yes please!
Yes, please share..
Logicreloaded@gmail.com
Very nice.
Solved it :)
I am trying upto hours but I can't solve this
So I play then I understand it
Thank you for
Very good puzzle
Much appreciated.. you commented very honestly. I'm glad you liked it:)
@@LOGICALLYYOURS thanks.
Great video
2:55 the above coin is touching only one coin.. i thought that move was invalid...
To be honest I did this quite quickly by ''cheating''.
If you start with the hexagon and then try to get the original shape ...
Much easier !!
Good one 😊