I have a question. Does when should I use "Speed Warp" vs "Enhanced Better" and the other options for interpolation? The result seems a bit random when it comes to the final product, I feel it depends heavily on which kind of video I'm trying to interpolate.
honestly the fastest frame prediction from davinci is good when the movements are not too big or you are only changing 25% of speed. speed warp for critical shots or for those slowed down too much 70% Or more... i triend topaz labs newest model to date and davinci is still better. i use topaz mainly for stabilization >> speed warp first, denoise if needed on davinci then stabilize on topaz for best results never heard of rife, is it me or I feel davinci is still better?
@@dandar_media I use an M2 Pro Macbook, and the render takes about 10-20x the clip duration for me. So not that bad, and I'm happy to wait if I get a better result.
okay...the difference is mindblowing!
Finde Davinci Speed Warp hier besser. Bei der AI wird der Hintergrund hinter den Radspeichen komisch verzerrt.
i test rife 2.3 vs 4.0 and 4.0 faster but glitched 2.3 slower but smoother
Could you make another video for 4.6 RIFE, please?
I have a question.
Does when should I use "Speed Warp" vs "Enhanced Better" and the other options for interpolation? The result seems a bit random when it comes to the final product, I feel it depends heavily on which kind of video I'm trying to interpolate.
honestly the fastest frame prediction from davinci is good when the movements are not too big or you are only changing 25% of speed. speed warp for critical shots or for those slowed down too much 70% Or more...
i triend topaz labs newest model to date and davinci is still better. i use topaz mainly for stabilization >> speed warp first, denoise if needed on davinci then stabilize on topaz for best results
never heard of rife, is it me or I feel davinci is still better?
how to make 60 fps optical flow video rendered without distortion lightening in remix song
davinci for the win
Have you tried Topaz? It worked really well for Frame Generation in my tests. Better than Davinci by far.
I mean it is, but you need to wait like for a whole week to render a 10 seconds clip (rtx 3060)
@@dandar_media I use an M2 Pro Macbook, and the render takes about 10-20x the clip duration for me. So not that bad, and I'm happy to wait if I get a better result.
Speed Warp is better than Flowframes
Which one renders faster
Don't know but would you use something which sucks even if it renders in 1 second? lol (flowframe)
davinci, it doesn't even take a second to load in my pc
@@metaltrooper8947what's your specs?
@@SpectrulightRTX 3060 12gb. 32 gb ram
In wheels flowframes loses absolutly
Yes I agree
@@saturn_fpv any update for 4.6 version?
FlowFrames поддерживает разные модели, и в данном примере использовалась Бета-версия, несмотря на то что существует стабильная