I would be so happy to see a tasmanian tiger comeback to life after man ignorantly hunted it to extinction. I've always been facinated with them, shared my name with the last recorded tiger. They are such important members of their Ecosystem's. It's like when Yellowstone reintroduced wolf's and realized all the positive effects it had on the environment, biodiversity, plant health, stream/river health, fish health, etc. It's actually mind boggling just how important some members of a ecosystem can be. We flourish the more our surroundings flourish.
The extinction of the Tasmanian tiger was caused by the ignorance of humanity. They didn't disappear as the result of evolution. This species had a definitive place in it's native ecosystem and the fact that they were wiped out to make room for species brought into the area for the convenience of humans was extremely unfortunate and unfair. Bring them back and please make sure they are adequately protected.
I’d imagine if they do successfully bring the Thylacine back they would be protected by law, even past the endangered status since they were/are so vital to the Tasmanian ecosystem. As it is, hunting protected native species is already punishable then imagine if they only just came back from extinction.
Professor Pask should look for a possible population in Papua New Guinea. If there are living thylacines there, we could captive breed them and add to their genetic diversity and eventually their repopulation of mainland Australia and Tasmania. That would take decades and bringing back an extinct keystone species would be no small feat.
He could find them a few hrs drive from his workplace. Alot safer than Papua and there hasn't been thousands of sightings in Papua but southern Victoria has!
People that have a problem with this can just cry about it. This is not a dinosaur that died 65,000,000 years ago. WE KILLED THEM. We should try to fix what did, if we can.
I don't think people who are mad about this don't realize how much cloning effects our world right now. Cloned beef is in your grocery store right now, people pay millions to clone their pets, etc. It is a bit of a common thing.
Only problem with this is those massive flocks pooping a river of pigeon poo everywhere they go. But they could help some of the native trees thrive by spreading thier seeds.
I really, really, really hope some governing committee or whatnot doesn't step in and somehow block this project for whatever reason and the world gets to see the successful re-integration of a species we caused the extinction of. I think it would be a wonderous achievement and a redemptive moment for mankind - a major cause for celebration. I've been following this for so many years and I'm nearly 60 now - hoping to live long enough to see this happen.
Hopefully some authorities will step in & stop this garbage! They are just making circus freaks that can not be put back in the wild, not real tigers. Let it go, it's extinct!
In my Novel: (Manner of the Sundog), one of the scientist-interns, presents Bane with an infant tyhlacine clone in a jar, as one of his projects. "Dr. Godel encourages us to be creative in our experiments." Jordy, explains.
Hunted and poached from ranchers in its time, the question of its survival is debatable is feasible to cost or whether the animal could survive with the disease or elements of a changed Australia.
This is going to take more than just a couple of years to happen, IF successful. If they are successful in bringing one back, they'll not only have to just bring the one back, but bring about 30 of them back.
This is amazing, great work guys. For those that oppose real science like this, that actually benefits all, think about the gain of function research ‘work’ and almost every country either financially supporting it or secretly carrying it out, leading to senseless pandemics
As I understand the last Tasmanian devil would’ve kept them formaldehyde and it destroyed any use for a genetic information to replicated have I misunderstood any answer would be greatly appreciated.
Tasmanian devil is a different predator. They are still hanging on, but are in trouble due to habitat loss and a specific cancer that has massively reduced their numbers. The thylacine is the Tasmanian tiger.
The closest thing we can do, as Jack Horner is still working on, is make a close imitation of one. These animals we create will never be a 1 to 1 of the real thing that existed those millions of years ago.
As long as it’s not a dinosaur. I think it’s fantastic to bring modern animals, provided there’s habitat for them. Ecosystems need predators…killing of the thylacine was idiotic.
I hope their successful. Besides being a beautiful animal, it would be a great way to deal with the existing invasive animals humans introduced into the areas they once lived.
I am not opposed to this at all ethically but I have some doubts about whether it is really as feasible as some, including this guy, think. I'll tentatively defer to them on the genetics. But I'm not sure gestation and that part of development dependent on the mother's hormones will be easy for extinct animals.
The tasmanian tiger (Mostly)kept the kangaroo population in check and the other marsupials..... and we wonder why there are WAY too many kangaroos is because we took away the ONLY dame preditor the kangaroos had/whould be worried about.
@@TheWeeJet Yeah, the megafauna must've been really tasty because they were wiped out relatively quickly once the aboriginal people showed up on the continent
@@scod3908 well megalania Co-existed with humans in Australia for like 15,000 years so not very quickly Tbh. Also megalania was probably already on the road to Extinction before humans arrived. Natural Extinction is a very slow process but it was probably very much so accelerated by humans.
@@TheWeeJet unfortunately there's not really an accurate way to know, all time periods are an educated guess at best Human caused extinction is natural extinction, we're just intelligent animals unless you're a member of a cult that worships an imaginary friend. Humans are the most destructive introduced species across the globe
The thing that he is not telling you is that there is nothing living that even slightly resembles, a Tasmanian tiger, so although they have the DNA genome, there is not a host in existence closely related enough. The Dunnart is as close to a thykacine as a cat is to a dog . It's impossible sadly.
so is the megatherium, though it will not be a clone, the scientists who want to make a megatherium or at least an egg of one, are looking at artificial wombs.
The plan is to rebalance ecosystems damaged by careless human intervention. Personally, I don’t see it happening in my lifetime, but de extinction could be more than science fiction in a century.
What is the point if there isn't enough suitable habitat? It won't be the true species and will be a freak of nature just there to be stared at in a zoo. The efforts would be better directed towards saving the Tasmanian devil and other rare species that are on the brink, as well as preserving the remaining habitat where the thylacine might still be hanging on. A lot of locals are adamant that a few are still out there.
@@Richard-gy1pq I like to believe that they are still out there and would like to see greater efforts to preserve the habitat where they are most likely to be hanging on. I think that DNA cloning is being done for the wrong reasons (to ease our guilt and to create a freak show).
It has to come back. I have been dreaming of the moment for 63 years, maybe even bring it back to the mainland, as it was the aborigines drove them to extinction on the mainland. Another animal I don't want to see be made extinct is the dingo, they are not wild dog's why label them as such? They are an unique species in their own right.
LOL! The Aboriginal people wiped out the Thylacine on mainland Australia when they introduced dogs (dingos). Scientists estimate that within about ~500yrs of introduction of the dingo the thylacine and devils were wiped out along with many other prey species of marsupials etc Dingos are just an ancient breed of introduced dog, and were introduced so recently in terms of evolution that they really don't "belong" in the ecosystem; devils and thylacines "belong"
Dingos and dogs are the biological definition of the same species; they interbreed easily and produce viable offspring that can reproduce. Yes dingos are a special animal in Australia's history, but they're a destructive introduced species that wiped out scores of native animals
It sickens me that humans destroyed this amazing animal. Every time I watch this stuff it hurts my soul that men thought they had the right to wipe out an entire species.
And we don't have a close animal even though we have DNA for it. The animal that the scientist want to bring back we don't have to close animal enough to bring it back
This move to bring back animals should come back with cautionary rules. First, only bring back animals that man killed to extinction. Others no longer belong here and make sure there is habitat available because #2 these animals should not be brought back for Zoo inventory!! If you need a captive pair, you make sure they have a large natural enclosure and they are treated like guests not manufactured creatures. #3 Nobody hunts or shoots a Tasmanian Tiger without losing everything they own. #4 these are not in order of importance, but before you do anything ask yourself why? Is it a selfish reason? Or do we need it to make Tasmania a better balanced ecosystem, which I believe would happen. Lastly, being able to bring an animal back, is not an excuse for man causing extinction. It does not excuse our attitude towards animals, predators in particular. They could look at White Rhino and Passenger Pigeons as other candidates.
I am Australian, but this isn't going to happen. I have never heard of any Australian "scientists" ever doing anything really, heck we don't even design our own naval ships, we can't even built jet etc, we as a country rarely do anything, they have been talking this BS about bringing back the Thylacine now for like 2 decades, and it's just empty talk. Now if it was a proper country trying to do this, like Japan, Germany, USA, heck even China, their scientists would have done it already long ago. But honestly I don't think Australian "scientists" will ever do this, they will just keep talking forever (that's all they seem to ever do). When was the last time an Australian even won a nobel Prize in science? There was a guy that moved here from the USA that won it in 2011, but the last time a proper Australian won one was in 2005. So in the past 18 years an Australian hasn't even won a nobel prize in a science field, where as even Japan has won it 16 times in that same period. Maybe it's time for Australia to stop talking all the time, and actually do something real (but I guess that's too hard).
I don't think that'll happen even in the next few decades, just my opinion though. Though it's too soon to be sure. If Jack Horner succeeds in his little velociraptor experiment, then it could be possible. This atavism gene trial and error could theoretically be done on other, more larger, flightless birds. The only problem is that these hybridized birds will just be a mockery of the real thing.
Oh yeah, there's one more thing to add, there'd be no ecosystem I think, that would fit the tyrannosaurus. If you think one can fit a carnivore as massive as it was then let me know. At least with the velociraptors, they'll fill the niche of coyotes and dogs, but will be threatened most by those same animals if they ever come in contact with one another, so they won't reproduce too much as they are the size of a chicken and weigh much less than the dogs and coyotes. That's if they ever get loose, which could end up happening.
6:45 It's a nucleus -- not a nuculus. Also, each chromosome doesn't contain hundreds of thousands of genes. It's about one thousand per chromosome on humans. These aren't your only mistakes. STOP YOUR TEACHING
Let me ask you a question, WHY bring them back? For our ego or pleasure? Consider the impact on the Tasmanian ecosystem if that happens. Ecosystems are finely balanced, between all living creatures within, who all play a vital role, from the smallest insect to the largest mammal. Humans are always 'playing God' with lower mammals. Killing off some, moving them to different areas of the globe not natural to that species. Research how many times man has screwed up bringing in one animal from some where else to help control another species, if never works out. Leave them alone I say.
What about the farmers? They provide food for all the rest of us, as well as providing for their families. Apparently you ignorant imbeciles are incapable of any kind of analytical thought. You’ll be unleashing another serious problem on farmers who are already struggling to provide for their families and the rest of us! What will you do when you can’t afford to buy food anymore or there are no farmers left to produce it? You so-called scientists who are perpetuating this will always have the money to buy food at any price, but what about the rest of us?
It still all seems very far fetched. I doubt they will succeed in the time frame given. The other animal they suggested is nowhere near close enough to tiger to be successful.
The Thylacine isn't extinct and has been sighted thousands of times in Tasmania, mainland Australia and PNG/West Papua. It's an extremely elusive creature that avoids man for it's own survival and exists primarily as a nocturnal predator in remote areas of bush. Critically endangered in Australia but not yet extinct
@@darrellm9915 More that some have been prevented from "proving it" ie that Thylacines still exist. Those include Parks and Wildlife staff who've seen them repeatedly and were silenced by their bosses. At least two men who claim to have shot Thylacines post 1970 and even had the carcasses to prove it. Of those one had the carcass taken from him by police and was told to keep his mouth shut or be prosecuted. Carcass never seen again. The second man was already terrified of being prosecuted and buried the carcass before admitting what he did to a few family members. Various Australian authorities know they still exist, but don't want a free for all of hunters and attention seekers, threatening their fragile populations. That's understandable. They're like Yowie sightings. People swear they've seen them but short of killing one, only have their word, foot prints and the odd grainy phone video
@@chaztheadvocate9598 As long as they still have the footage, there is no one stopping them from sharing it on social media or websites that are free of censorship. If they can't do this then I find it hard to believe they're telling the truth.
@@darrellm9915 He's a loon, there are thousands of trail cameras and no credible footage. Thylacines were a delicate species, they were wiped off the mainland along with devils within about ~500years of the aboriginal people introducing dogs (dingos)
That's what I'm thinking. I would assume the closest relatives would be the Tasmanian devil, which is roughly half its size, and the much smaller quoll and dunnart. But since they are all marsupials, they're born in essentially an embryonic stage. Might (???) be easier for the related species to gestate them than would be the case for a placental mammal to gestate a related species. But what about the joeys' development in the pouch, assuming the milk is even suitable?
Logging will not let you 🤷🏽♂️ even if it was still alive anything left would be secretly hunted or just str8 up burned alive. Logging calls this practice ring or fire cut around land you want burn the rest to the center
Its a stupid thing to protest. Go protest Mammoths being brought back, not these creatures we obliterated just 80 years ago. If we can we should in this case. We actually owe this to alot of creatires.
I wanted to come back but I don't think it will come back today but I think it will come back like in 2025 because the people got to find the DNA of the I think that'll it will come back well that's it for now but if it comes back I will be so happy I always wanted to be a scientist when I but of these things come back I hope they don't come heel will I live in my country because I don't want them killing my chickens
Totally different situation. The thylacine went extinct less than a century ago, as the direct result of human activity. It was part of the modern fauna, it is adapted to the current environment in Tasmania. Dinosaurs and archosaurs went extinct 65 million years ago. Not to mention they were much larger and more dangerous.
It's a rather funny for those that denied this kind of project while calling it playing GOD, yet without denied our human have been the official DESTROYER throughout the history and still are until now which I don't see many goes against that.... A question of thought: was it wrong if we could undone the mistake our forefather have committed while we should and we can? Or many times of the same mistakes we are going to do until there's nothing left for us to destroy and no one else to blame but ourselves as what will you tell your children when there not a single wild animals on earth "well, I sit back and I did nothing but denied doing anything".
I would be so happy to see a tasmanian tiger comeback to life after man ignorantly hunted it to extinction. I've always been facinated with them, shared my name with the last recorded tiger. They are such important members of their Ecosystem's. It's like when Yellowstone reintroduced wolf's and realized all the positive effects it had on the environment, biodiversity, plant health, stream/river health, fish health, etc. It's actually mind boggling just how important some members of a ecosystem can be. We flourish the more our surroundings flourish.
same but i live in the U.S.🙁
They weren’t “hunted” to extinction. They were killed to preserve livestock of farmers. As a hunter, I know that we do much to preserve species
@@Icriedtoday ban farmers
🙌 👏 🙏 🤝 👍 me too mate !!
I agree!👍
They should bring back the Ivory Billed Woodpecker as well, hunted to extinction, by man. Black and White Rhinoceros.
The extinction of the Tasmanian tiger was caused by the ignorance of humanity. They didn't disappear as the result of evolution. This species had a definitive place in it's native ecosystem and the fact that they were wiped out to make room for species brought into the area for the convenience of humans was extremely unfortunate and unfair.
Bring them back and please make sure they are adequately protected.
man is also an animal 🤷🏼♂️
Humans evolved and are part of the ecosystem just like every other animal.
Google the fate of the original Tasmanian people.
@@gbugabu5278 not really
I’d imagine if they do successfully bring the Thylacine back they would be protected by law, even past the endangered status since they were/are so vital to the Tasmanian ecosystem. As it is, hunting protected native species is already punishable then imagine if they only just came back from extinction.
Excellent interview, I reallly hope they succeed to bring the tasmanian tiger back to life and fix one of the biggest mistake in mankind.
Fascinating! I hope I’m alive to in 10 to 20 years see the Tasmanian Tiger reborn.
Professor Pask should look for a possible population in Papua New Guinea. If there are living thylacines there, we could captive breed them and add to their genetic diversity and eventually their repopulation of mainland Australia and Tasmania. That would take decades and bringing back an extinct keystone species would be no small feat.
He could find them a few hrs drive from his workplace. Alot safer than Papua and there hasn't been thousands of sightings in Papua but southern Victoria has!
He can find them in my dreams
They need to do an expedition in the jungles of New Guinea and find out if they are still thylacine in the remote regions!
They are still around. They should just go out and find them.
Just fly drones around
Love this guys passion
People that have a problem with this can just cry about it. This is not a dinosaur that died 65,000,000 years ago. WE KILLED THEM. We should try to fix what did, if we can.
I don't think people who are mad about this don't realize how much cloning effects our world right now. Cloned beef is in your grocery store right now, people pay millions to clone their pets, etc. It is a bit of a common thing.
fish too
After the tasmanian tiger is brought back, I hope they can return the passenger pigeon, woolly Mammoth and quagga.
Don't forget the Dodo and the Hawaiʻi ʻōʻō
@@XoroksComment western black rhino, great auk and baiji too 😚
@@roronoazoro9852 Auerochs and Caucasian wisent too
Steller's Sea Cow too!
@@XoroksComment yes aurochs! Maybe Stellaris sea cow and take a crack at the pyrenean ibex again 😸
There was talk of bringing back the passenger pigeon to the eastern us. It went extinct in 1917
Yep very easily as the pigeon we have now is a very close relative there was hundred of millions before and we wiped them all out 😢
Only problem with this is those massive flocks pooping a river of pigeon poo everywhere they go. But they could help some of the native trees thrive by spreading thier seeds.
I would like to see the return of the Carolina/Louisiana parakeet and the Labrador duck
i would love to see tassie tigers come back.
The latest news I hear is that there is now a $2 Billion biotech company which is dedicating resources to bringing back this animal AND the Dodo.
बहुत बढिया ✅️👍🏼
विश्लेषण की शैली
सरल, फिरभी तेज
मान गये उस्ताद 🙏🏽
Very interesting Emma, another great interview.
Cheers from San Diego California 👍
I really, really, really hope some governing committee or whatnot doesn't step in and somehow block this project for whatever reason and the world gets to see the successful re-integration of a species we caused the extinction of. I think it would be a wonderous achievement and a redemptive moment for mankind - a major cause for celebration. I've been following this for so many years and I'm nearly 60 now - hoping to live long enough to see this happen.
Hopefully some authorities will step in & stop this garbage! They are just making circus freaks that can not be put back in the wild, not real tigers. Let it go, it's extinct!
@@haywoodjablowme883 Time will tell. Until then we'll have to agree to disagree. I hope you're wrong, though. I'm optimistic for success.
This scientist isn't playing god. Humans did that when we wiped out the thylacine. Him and his team are trying to right a wrong.
Even if they succeed..it still won't be a true Thyla scene..because it's mother will not be one..because the host mother's DNA would be mixed with it.
Any progress on the gastric breeding toad?
Oh my gosh I'm so excited to see the thylacine or tasmanian tiger again!
Going to have to remove all dingo,fox,cat, and dog for even a chance for this to work.
I pray that they succeed and effectively reverse one of humanity's many mistakes.
Everything is always a decade away
Where is my fusion reactor and my flying car? Maybe in 10 years. 🤷 LOL
Well I certainly do wish them all the best in their efforts.
In my Novel: (Manner of the Sundog), one of the scientist-interns, presents Bane with an infant tyhlacine clone in a jar, as one of his projects. "Dr. Godel encourages us to be creative in our experiments." Jordy, explains.
Hunted and poached from ranchers in its time, the question of its survival is debatable is feasible to cost or whether the animal could survive with the disease or elements of a changed Australia.
I honestly pray to God that it does work they are beautiful creatures beautiful animals that deserve to be back
They are NOT EXTINCT !!!
@@matthuitt1004 We don’t know if they are.
I heard it was impossible to bring it back because it doesn't have any close mammal relatives?
Would help end mouse plagues too.
His sequencing is wrong
I wish you the best of luck. Yes, we do owe it to nature to restore what we have destroyed!
Please bring this amazing animal back
Its been a year , do they successfully clone it?
This is going to take more than just a couple of years to happen, IF successful. If they are successful in bringing one back, they'll not only have to just bring the one back, but bring about 30 of them back.
This is amazing, great work guys.
For those that oppose real science like this, that actually benefits all, think about the gain of function research ‘work’ and almost every country either financially supporting it or secretly carrying it out, leading to senseless pandemics
As I understand the last Tasmanian devil would’ve kept them formaldehyde and it destroyed any use for a genetic information to replicated have I misunderstood any answer would be greatly appreciated.
They have a fetus that was kept in ALCOHOL!
They have at least one sample that was kept in alcohol. That's how they first got it's DNA.
@@AFloridaSon I thought it was a fetus.
Tasmanian devil is a different predator. They are still hanging on, but are in trouble due to habitat loss and a specific cancer that has massively reduced their numbers. The thylacine is the Tasmanian tiger.
Devil ???
Will that Steven Spielberg film actually be possible now??Expect a dinosaur any time soon?
The closest thing we can do, as Jack Horner is still working on, is make a close imitation of one. These animals we create will never be a 1 to 1 of the real thing that existed those millions of years ago.
If they're not any in Tasmania I bet there's a small population in papa new guinea
As long as it’s not a dinosaur. I think it’s fantastic to bring modern animals, provided there’s habitat for them. Ecosystems need predators…killing of the thylacine was idiotic.
I hope their successful. Besides being a beautiful animal, it would be a great way to deal with the existing invasive animals humans introduced into the areas they once lived.
I’m excited ❤
I am not opposed to this at all ethically but I have some doubts about whether it is really as feasible as some, including this guy, think. I'll tentatively defer to them on the genetics. But I'm not sure gestation and that part of development dependent on the mother's hormones will be easy for extinct animals.
Is Dr. Pask bringing back the Mammoth after the Thylacine?
Are you joining Cookie in Season 4?
ruclips.net/video/3PRHMtTs1rw/видео.html
Why do we need to bring thyla back when they never left. Just very well hid out from prying eyes. 🤩🤩
The tasmanian tiger (Mostly)kept the kangaroo population in check and the other marsupials..... and we wonder why there are WAY too many kangaroos is because we took away the ONLY dame preditor the kangaroos had/whould be worried about.
Sorry but I thought dingo dogs have taken their role. Am I wrong?
It just needs to be done……. Good work mate 👍
I wish this is Success
Was the Tasmanian Tiger the only Apex Predator? What about Megalania? The 2000lb monitor lizard?
Megalania went extinct like 40,000 years ago.
Bro what
@@TheWeeJet Yeah, the megafauna must've been really tasty because they were wiped out relatively quickly once the aboriginal people showed up on the continent
@@scod3908 well megalania Co-existed with humans in Australia for like 15,000 years so not very quickly Tbh.
Also megalania was probably already on the road to Extinction before humans arrived.
Natural Extinction is a very slow process but it was probably very much so accelerated by humans.
@@TheWeeJet unfortunately there's not really an accurate way to know, all time periods are an educated guess at best
Human caused extinction is natural extinction, we're just intelligent animals unless you're a member of a cult that worships an imaginary friend. Humans are the most destructive introduced species across the globe
The thing that he is not telling you is that there is nothing living that even slightly resembles, a Tasmanian tiger, so although they have the DNA genome, there is not a host in existence closely related enough. The Dunnart is as close to a thykacine as a cat is to a dog . It's impossible sadly.
so is the megatherium, though it will not be a clone, the scientists who want to make a megatherium or at least an egg of one, are looking at artificial wombs.
They talk about it in the video... Skip to 8:59
This would be amazing, please do it, they deserve a second chance
why
With technology advancing like it is, I would say half the time that he mentioned.
crispr
This is great news, how are the aboriginals doing??? Any of their elders in on this project?
I hope we can find a way.
Well this is awesome
We need to bring animals that can help climate change ASAP!!! I love what these scientists are doing ❤ I support them ❤
So idk, is the plan to recreate this thing and release it back into the wild? No one else getting jurassic park vibes?
The plan is to rebalance ecosystems damaged by careless human intervention. Personally, I don’t see it happening in my lifetime, but de extinction could be more than science fiction in a century.
bruh, tasmanian tigers were the size of dogs not 6 meter tall
Not really they animals died because of man the dinosaurs died cause of mother nature
wow so this could happen in my lifetime!
What is the point if there isn't enough suitable habitat? It won't be the true species and will be a freak of nature just there to be stared at in a zoo.
The efforts would be better directed towards saving the Tasmanian devil and other rare species that are on the brink, as well as preserving the remaining habitat where the thylacine might still be hanging on. A lot of locals are adamant that a few are still out there.
Farmers can identify animals as majority have been doing it lifelong. If they're not here why are they're tracks still found.
@@Richard-gy1pq I like to believe that they are still out there and would like to see greater efforts to preserve the habitat where they are most likely to be hanging on. I think that DNA cloning is being done for the wrong reasons (to ease our guilt and to create a freak show).
I suppose cloning has it good points to save other species in future.
My fav animal that's gohn is back yesss perfect keep it up make them the most seen animal in the world
It has to come back. I have been dreaming of the moment for 63 years, maybe even bring it back to the mainland, as it was the aborigines drove them to extinction on the mainland. Another animal I don't want to see be made extinct is the dingo, they are not wild dog's why label them as such? They are an unique species in their own right.
LOL! The Aboriginal people wiped out the Thylacine on mainland Australia when they introduced dogs (dingos). Scientists estimate that within about ~500yrs of introduction of the dingo the thylacine and devils were wiped out along with many other prey species of marsupials etc
Dingos are just an ancient breed of introduced dog, and were introduced so recently in terms of evolution that they really don't "belong" in the ecosystem; devils and thylacines "belong"
Dingos and dogs are the biological definition of the same species; they interbreed easily and produce viable offspring that can reproduce. Yes dingos are a special animal in Australia's history, but they're a destructive introduced species that wiped out scores of native animals
We need the dodo bird back now
The “company” working on the Tiger is also working on the Dodo!
It sickens me that humans destroyed this amazing animal. Every time I watch this stuff it hurts my soul that men thought they had the right to wipe out an entire species.
And we don't have a close animal even though we have DNA for it. The animal that the scientist want to bring back we don't have to close animal enough to bring it back
This move to bring back animals should come back with cautionary rules.
First, only bring back animals that man killed to extinction. Others no longer belong here and make sure there is habitat available because
#2 these animals should not be brought back for Zoo inventory!! If you need a captive pair, you make sure they have a large natural enclosure and they are treated like guests not manufactured creatures.
#3 Nobody hunts or shoots a Tasmanian Tiger without losing everything they own.
#4 these are not in order of importance, but before you do anything ask yourself why? Is it a selfish reason? Or do we need it to make Tasmania a better balanced ecosystem, which I believe would happen.
Lastly, being able to bring an animal back, is not an excuse for man causing extinction. It does not excuse our attitude towards animals, predators in particular.
They could look at White Rhino and Passenger Pigeons as other candidates.
Is the bounty still in place? If so, what's a dead one worth in today's currency? Asking for a mate
I am Australian, but this isn't going to happen. I have never heard of any Australian "scientists" ever doing anything really, heck we don't even design our own naval ships, we can't even built jet etc, we as a country rarely do anything, they have been talking this BS about bringing back the Thylacine now for like 2 decades, and it's just empty talk.
Now if it was a proper country trying to do this, like Japan, Germany, USA, heck even China, their scientists would have done it already long ago. But honestly I don't think Australian "scientists" will ever do this, they will just keep talking forever (that's all they seem to ever do).
When was the last time an Australian even won a nobel Prize in science? There was a guy that moved here from the USA that won it in 2011, but the last time a proper Australian won one was in 2005. So in the past 18 years an Australian hasn't even won a nobel prize in a science field, where as even Japan has won it 16 times in that same period.
Maybe it's time for Australia to stop talking all the time, and actually do something real (but I guess that's too hard).
I want a T rex!!
T-Rexes are impossible to revive due to the DNA being too old.
They’d wreck all of the ecosystems in the world since it’s nature’s perfect killer.
I don't think that'll happen even in the next few decades, just my opinion though. Though it's too soon to be sure. If Jack Horner succeeds in his little velociraptor experiment, then it could be possible. This atavism gene trial and error could theoretically be done on other, more larger, flightless birds. The only problem is that these hybridized birds will just be a mockery of the real thing.
Oh yeah, there's one more thing to add, there'd be no ecosystem I think, that would fit the tyrannosaurus. If you think one can fit a carnivore as massive as it was then let me know. At least with the velociraptors, they'll fill the niche of coyotes and dogs, but will be threatened most by those same animals if they ever come in contact with one another, so they won't reproduce too much as they are the size of a chicken and weigh much less than the dogs and coyotes. That's if they ever get loose, which could end up happening.
In m'y understanding of the video, the Tasmaniam Tiger going to be supporter n'y a compétent tram. What a New arrangement for the Nature doesn't you?
You also have to recreate suitable habitats. That will take decades.
6:45 It's a nucleus -- not a nuculus. Also, each chromosome doesn't contain hundreds of thousands of genes. It's about one thousand per chromosome on humans. These aren't your only mistakes. STOP YOUR TEACHING
Id love them to be brought back. But the reality is they most likely will never😢
You say you now have the ability to clone thylacines. So, do i already.
If they can do it, why dont they get on with it them!
Let me ask you a question, WHY bring them back? For our ego or pleasure? Consider the impact on the Tasmanian ecosystem if that happens. Ecosystems are finely balanced, between all living creatures within, who all play a vital role, from the smallest insect to the largest mammal. Humans are always 'playing God' with lower mammals. Killing off some, moving them to different areas of the globe not natural to that species. Research how many times man has screwed up bringing in one animal from some where else to help control another species, if never works out. Leave them alone I say.
What about the farmers? They provide food for all the rest of us, as well as providing for their families. Apparently you ignorant imbeciles are incapable of any kind of analytical thought. You’ll be unleashing another serious problem on farmers who are already struggling to provide for their families and the rest of us! What will you do when you can’t afford to buy food anymore or there are no farmers left to produce it? You so-called scientists who are perpetuating this will always have the money to buy food at any price, but what about the rest of us?
You are brain dead, they belong there end of story
We played “god” when we pushed the Thylacine into extinction.
It still all seems very far fetched. I doubt they will succeed in the time frame given. The other animal they suggested is nowhere near close enough to tiger to be successful.
Bring it back so it can hunt pest like rabbits 🐇 and foxes 🦊. It would be and interesting to see a fight with wild dogs and fox .
The Thylacine isn't extinct and has been sighted thousands of times in Tasmania, mainland Australia and PNG/West Papua. It's an extremely elusive creature that avoids man for it's own survival and exists primarily as a nocturnal predator in remote areas of bush. Critically endangered in Australia but not yet extinct
Yet no one can ever prove it.
@@darrellm9915 More that some have been prevented from "proving it" ie that Thylacines still exist. Those include Parks and Wildlife staff who've seen them repeatedly and were silenced by their bosses. At least two men who claim to have shot Thylacines post 1970 and even had the carcasses to prove it. Of those one had the carcass taken from him by police and was told to keep his mouth shut or be prosecuted. Carcass never seen again. The second man was already terrified of being prosecuted and buried the carcass before admitting what he did to a few family members. Various Australian authorities know they still exist, but don't want a free for all of hunters and attention seekers, threatening their fragile populations. That's understandable. They're like Yowie sightings. People swear they've seen them but short of killing one, only have their word, foot prints and the odd grainy phone video
@@chaztheadvocate9598 As long as they still have the footage, there is no one stopping them from sharing it on social media or websites that are free of censorship. If they can't do this then I find it hard to believe they're telling the truth.
@@darrellm9915 He's a loon, there are thousands of trail cameras and no credible footage. Thylacines were a delicate species, they were wiped off the mainland along with devils within about ~500years of the aboriginal people introducing dogs (dingos)
Let’s hope
if they are released into wild it would be awesome but it needs protection laws if anyone kills them its life imprisonment and 10 mil fine
There has been a law since 1936 that protects the thylacines. Hunting them is forbidden.
That's answered the surrogate size issue I've heard people be dismissive about...fascinating
This is ABSOLUTELY INCREDIBLE!!
So if it’s born a boy how do you get a girl for them to breed🦘
"ethically we owe it to these animals" bruh what ethical system does this weirdo subscribe to
He already killed it because its own chest were cut
There’s no common relative close enough to surrogate
That's what I'm thinking. I would assume the closest relatives would be the Tasmanian devil, which is roughly half its size, and the much smaller quoll and dunnart. But since they are all marsupials, they're born in essentially an embryonic stage. Might (???) be easier for the related species to gestate them than would be the case for a placental mammal to gestate a related species. But what about the joeys' development in the pouch, assuming the milk is even suitable?
well one thing will be missing the stuf they teach there babies how to live in the wild
I dunno I feel like this is one of those things where u fk around and make zombies 😂
Logging will not let you 🤷🏽♂️ even if it was still alive anything left would be secretly hunted or just str8 up burned alive. Logging calls this practice ring or fire cut around land you want burn the rest to the center
Its a stupid thing to protest. Go protest Mammoths being brought back, not these creatures we obliterated just 80 years ago. If we can we should in this case. We actually owe this to alot of creatires.
Well . . . after the tasmanian tiger . . . . one certain day . . . comes Elvis and Marilyn . . . .I BET . . .
So your telling me they Jurassic parked some other dna into it.. ooga booga
I wanted to come back but I don't think it will come back today but I think it will come back like in 2025 because the people got to find the DNA of the I think that'll it will come back well that's it for now but if it comes back I will be so happy I always wanted to be a scientist when I but of these things come back I hope they don't come heel will I live in my country because I don't want them killing my chickens
Mankind deleted their existence. It's moral for us to bring them back.
Have we learned nothing from Jurassic Park?
It all depends on what you bring back and how you control that population afterwards
Nah that movie was more fantasy than science
Totally different situation. The thylacine went extinct less than a century ago, as the direct result of human activity.
It was part of the modern fauna, it is adapted to the current environment in Tasmania.
Dinosaurs and archosaurs went extinct 65 million years ago. Not to mention they were much larger and more dangerous.
Free too hunt
Only Apex predator? need some time outta that city mate
It's a rather funny for those that denied this kind of project while calling it playing GOD, yet without denied our human have been the official DESTROYER throughout the history and still are until now which I don't see many goes against that....
A question of thought: was it wrong if we could undone the mistake our forefather have committed while we should and we can?
Or many times of the same mistakes we are going to do until there's nothing left for us to destroy and no one else to blame but ourselves as what will you tell your children when there not a single wild animals on earth "well, I sit back and I did nothing but denied doing anything".
I can't see engineered Tas tigers being able to breed. Only nature can assign this ability.