Most of the comments under this video are embarrassing. People have just watched an hour long presentation explaining very clearly how we know the age of the moon with plenty of interesting points to follow up and fact check if they want to but no, we just get the same ignorant rubbish you read under flat earth videos.
I believe that I will go with theories based upon a belief in chemistry and physics which is postulated after a review and evaluation of facts and evidence. For example, rock chemistry, the moon's orbit moving away from the earth and its' period of rotation slowing, abundance of heavy elements in the earth's core and lightweight composition of the moon (as if a second planet or proto planet deposited its' cores' accumulation of heavy elements into the earth by impact and then reformed from crust material thrown off from the impact). Recent identification of denser areas within the earth's mantle possibly left from the impact. Maybe the doubters get my drift, but probably not.
Man I really started getting hungry after watching his triangular Primary Crust to metal core slides. PIZZA with everything on it. I'll have to watch the rest of this later.
Are the Apollo mission rocks the same as the one given to Holland? BTW - The blue marble photo you show is a product of photoshopping, and an artists imagination. When will cameras be put on the Moon, so we can see the Earth in real time. I am tired of looking at the artist rendered CGI Moon images available on the web. The technology is available to set up a 24 /7 camera on the ISS, and then there is the Hubble telescope.
@ Georgia Albert - Smoking Woman . And while they are at it would you please put a 50 dollar 360 deg. 4k camera on the space station? Or when the actornots are on the station for an "Event" could the camera man turn around while filming?
The same thing happens in the Environmental Lead Proficiency Analytical Testing (ELPAT) Program. Paint chip samples are obtained from lead-based paints that have lead in known quantities and distributed to participating laboratories that desire this certification. The analytical results after microwave assisted digestion using nitric acid and then ICP-OES analysis yield a variety of lead concentrations. All the individual labs are given is their difference from the mean in standard deviations. You need a statistical evaluation of lots of data and to not trust any one analytical result.
@@watchingvideos2235 The photographer is "on the surface" of the moon, so the earth should always be directly above his head, since the same face of the moon continuously points at earth. According to the non scientific heliocentric model, the earth would never be viewed on the horizon of the moon by an observer on the moon facing earth, this is not difficult.
@@bgilchrist228 I understand what you are saying. My question to you is, where would the moon appear in the sky if the photograph is taken from the half of the moon that always faces away from Earth?
@@watchingvideos2235 That would be a position on the dark side of the moon, where the astronots never were according to NASA. The astronot never even claimed to be close the dark side, look at the claimed landing sights.. I think you meant to say the earth in the moon's "sky".
@@bgilchrist228 I think you mean the far side of the moon, since the sun reaches the side we don't see, as well. The astronauts don't have to have landed smack in the middle of the near side to "not" be on the far side. They could easily have landed toward the edge between infacing and outfacing sides, in which case the moon would appear toward the horizon. Just like the moon appears on earth... In other words the moon does not always appear in "noon" position.
The analogy on the rocks is not of the moon. It's of what meteors that hit the moon from elsewhere out in the universe. Take core samples and then get back to me.
We definitely went but everything from the event is distorted and there is fake footage from that era that is in circulation and I am in the unique position to say that’s a fact so as far as the deniers that believe we did nit go it is understandable why they feel like that and as far as those that make fun of the deniers, they are acting exactly like they have been programmed to.
Maybe go to the moon then let's talk about your rocks opps the first photo is off the earth should be four times larger and four times larger wile looking from the moon should see blue earth skyline standing on the moon looking up, out, down ,left right all you would see would be earth blue sky's living on the moon 🌚
Somewhat trivial, but why & how does our moon literally glow allegedly from the sun shining down on it, when our Earth does not? And why doesn’t the moon have water? It’s been hit just as many times, if not more by asteroids & meteors as earth has..... and that’s NASA’s running theory on how earth acquired its water... through asteroids. 🙋🏻♀️
The Earth has an albedo rating of its own, it does "glow" when the sun shines upon it. Also, comets deposited the water on our planet, not asteroids. Asteroids by definition carry no water, many of which are probably comets that lost their volatile compounds. Further, water will evaporate into space if it isn't kept under pressure. There is no atmosphere on the moon, its gravity is too weak to hold onto one.
Is the moon made from petrified wood like the "moon" rock given to Holland by astronots from NASA?
@ Here's another one: Pence heads the "space force".
What a dim dim.. we all KNOW it is made out of cheese!
Wow, comment section makes me feel a little embarrassed; so many stupid people, am I really the same species as the tin foil brigade
Same species but different mindset. You actually have a mind and they apparently lost theirs some time ago.
They're just schizophrenic's don't pay attention to them
Yepper
I think I'm hearing some shyte. Please explain the magic of grabbity. I love hear the formula explained
Most of the comments under this video are embarrassing. People have just watched an hour long presentation explaining very clearly how we know the age of the moon with plenty of interesting points to follow up and fact check if they want to but no, we just get the same ignorant rubbish you read under flat earth videos.
Informative, I learned a few things which I enjoyed.
So, if the moon is postulated as an artificial structure, does the data gathered from the moon rocks support that hypothesis?
I believe that I will go with theories based upon a belief in chemistry and physics which is postulated after a review and evaluation of facts and evidence. For example, rock chemistry, the moon's orbit moving away from the earth and its' period of rotation slowing, abundance of heavy elements in the earth's core and lightweight composition of the moon (as if a second planet or proto planet deposited its' cores' accumulation of heavy elements into the earth by impact and then reformed from crust material thrown off from the impact). Recent identification of denser areas within the earth's mantle possibly left from the impact. Maybe the doubters get my drift, but probably not.
Man I really started getting hungry after watching his triangular Primary Crust to metal core slides. PIZZA with everything on it. I'll have to watch the rest of this later.
Are the Apollo mission rocks the same as the one given to Holland? BTW - The blue marble photo you show is a product of photoshopping, and an artists imagination. When will cameras be put on the Moon, so we can see the Earth in real time. I am tired of looking at the artist rendered CGI Moon images available on the web. The technology is available to set up a 24 /7 camera on the ISS, and then there is the Hubble telescope.
@ Georgia Albert - Smoking Woman . And while they are at it would you please put a 50 dollar 360 deg. 4k camera on the space station? Or when the actornots are on the station for an "Event" could the camera man turn around while filming?
All these moon landing deniers crack me up, thanks for the laughs!
The same thing happens in the Environmental Lead Proficiency Analytical Testing (ELPAT) Program. Paint chip samples are obtained from lead-based paints that have lead in known quantities and distributed to participating laboratories that desire this certification. The analytical results after microwave assisted digestion using nitric acid and then ICP-OES analysis yield a variety of lead concentrations. All the individual labs are given is their difference from the mean in standard deviations. You need a statistical evaluation of lots of data and to not trust any one analytical result.
Cheeeeegueiiii
How's the social distancing going for these fools
How is the Earth on the horizon of the moon if the moon rotates perfectly to keep the earth at its apex?
Depends on the location of the photographer relative to the apex.
@@watchingvideos2235 The photographer is "on the surface" of the moon, so the earth should always be directly above his head, since the same face of the moon continuously points at earth. According to the non scientific heliocentric model, the earth would never be viewed on the horizon of the moon by an observer on the moon facing earth, this is not difficult.
@@bgilchrist228 I understand what you are saying. My question to you is, where would the moon appear in the sky if the photograph is taken from the half of the moon that always faces away from Earth?
@@watchingvideos2235 That would be a position on the dark side of the moon, where the astronots never were according to NASA. The astronot never even claimed to be close the dark side, look at the claimed landing sights.. I think you meant to say the earth in the moon's "sky".
@@bgilchrist228 I think you mean the far side of the moon, since the sun reaches the side we don't see, as well. The astronauts don't have to have landed smack in the middle of the near side to "not" be on the far side. They could easily have landed toward the edge between infacing and outfacing sides, in which case the moon would appear toward the horizon. Just like the moon appears on earth... In other words the moon does not always appear in "noon" position.
We don't know how it was made? Just a theory?
I heard myself NASA said no man has gone threw the Van Allen belt, am I missing something here?
Ross well, the moon is in our atmosphere, so....
You're right they adjusted their course to fly up and over it on the way to the Moon so technically they didn't go through it
through
How were they streaming on the moon if there is no wifi on the moon!?? Wake up sheeple!!11
Isnt this what the sumerian tablets say? Something about wandering planets or is that just from that one guy Sitchin?
People in antiquity didn't know shit, so maybe give it a rest.
The analogy on the rocks is not of the moon. It's of what meteors that hit the moon from elsewhere out in the universe. Take core samples and then get back to me.
he's a BORG!!!!!!!! quickly....
We definitely went but everything from the event is distorted and there is fake footage from that era that is in circulation and I am in the unique position to say that’s a fact so as far as the deniers that believe we did nit go it is understandable why they feel like that and as far as those that make fun of the deniers, they are acting exactly like they have been programmed to.
We bow to your supreme authority on this subject!
rockets need an atmosphere to thrust against, theres no atmosphere in the vacuum of "space" apparently
have you heard of third newton's law? Go learn physics and do something valuable to the society instead of believing in dumb conspiracy theories
Flat Earther's RUclips Channel Fodder.
What a nice fairytale he’s telling us. Delivered with beautiful CGI. Well, it must be true then.
Sorry you're stupid.
moon landings lol
Maybe go to the moon then let's talk about your rocks opps the first photo is off the earth should be four times larger and four times larger wile looking from the moon should see blue earth skyline standing on the moon looking up, out, down ,left right all you would see would be earth blue sky's living on the moon 🌚
I don't think someone with kindergarten level grammar should be trying to educate anyone about space.
Somewhat trivial, but why & how does our moon literally glow allegedly from the sun shining down on it, when our Earth does not? And why doesn’t the moon have water? It’s been hit just as many times, if not more by asteroids & meteors as earth has..... and that’s NASA’s running theory on how earth acquired its water... through asteroids. 🙋🏻♀️
The Earth has an albedo rating of its own, it does "glow" when the sun shines upon it. Also, comets deposited the water on our planet, not asteroids. Asteroids by definition carry no water, many of which are probably comets that lost their volatile compounds. Further, water will evaporate into space if it isn't kept under pressure. There is no atmosphere on the moon, its gravity is too weak to hold onto one.
Comets have ice, frozen water, provided earth with its ocean water, and moon of course was hit too. Moon has water in its crust, but it is frozen.
Don't waste to much time on his guessing or his assumptions lame "💩tt "⚠️🍭
Such crap this video!! No one went to the moon people!! The earth is clearly flat from all observations. ✌️✌️🍎🍎
what observations..... Clearly we should listen to people with flat brains plant eater syndrome.
lies lies lies
@Star Ferg
Specifically?
How's the social distancing going for these fools