though i do believe there’s no such thing as a ‘bad’ question, that dude’s question at the end came off as very ignorant, arrogant and disrespectful - a ‘kids’ language, seriously? please: enlighten us simpletons with what your definition of a so-called ‘kids’ language, even is. i think he just wanted to hear himself talk, just like i want to see myself write this stupid comment.
Or maybe the opposite IMO. The question was simple why to use GO instead of JS with NodeJS for server stuff. Sergey seemed unable to answer with confidence that question. The answer hides deep inside the technology between NodeJS and Go. Also the argument that "Go is Safer" was just a "mambo jumbo" answer :)
@@Rambou92 afaik it’s safer than pure JS in that it’s typed and compiles, giving you compile time errors. Typescript exists for that reason if I’m not mistaken.
IMO he failed to respond with a better answer. The most critical advantage golang has over js is better multicore utilization, static binary generation, cross compilation for multiple architectures.
How someone dare to say kids language and all, about Golang. See it is 100 times faster than Python with built in concurrency. It is kind of C language of modern times and see the great people behind i.t
seems like some things in the talk are not a true. He said you have to use interfaces in order to override "parent" methods, but how about methods shadowing? It works well without interfaces. The question about constructors and "why Go works well without it" it's a bull**it, because he didn't show a default value for pointer, he created a new instance of the Car structure and took the address to it (car := &Car). var car *Car; printSpeed(car) will throw a panic because the variable car is nil and this is a true usage of default values in this example and there is no difference with Java
Yeah i was testing it and this code just does not work at all lol You cannot instantiate a struct with unexported fields outside his package. And if you are inside the package unexported properties are accessible anayway so you are not encapsulating anything with the getter method but just duplicating stuff for whatever reason
26:15 Only problem that I have with this talk is that this code is so small and hard to read that I must guess some part of it. Otherwise, very good talk.
Great talk: why apples (the fruits, not the lifestyle corp) are better than oranges. It would have been a big improvement to the talk if the speaker would have explained that there are different flavours or interpretations of oo, but unfortunately he seems to be stuck in Java? Another big improvement would have been if he would have applied Go's interpretation of oo (and it is also oo, unless you only see exactly one narrow version of oo as oo) to different types of projects. Then suddly the Go way isn't as easy, as some years of industrial and post-industrial practise might have to,d him before. Imho, a mediocre talk that does Go more harm than good. But time will tell.
sorry to be offtopic but does someone know a way to get back into an instagram account..? I stupidly lost my account password. I appreciate any tips you can give me.
Nothing magical about Java annotations - if you understand how they work and the underlying e.g. GOF patterns. The "Java bad" slide really doesn't wash at all. BTW compiling to a little binary is so 1989.
whomever commented on Go to be a kids language... maybe writes Assembly x86 manually for food.
This Talk is a very simple and easy way of explaining the core concepts
This means a lot for me, Thank you!
08:10 Inheritance
09:50 Polymorphism
Very good ! Thanks !
Here before 2022
great talk!
Very good talk.
though i do believe there’s no such thing as a ‘bad’ question, that dude’s question at the end came off as very ignorant, arrogant and disrespectful - a ‘kids’ language, seriously? please: enlighten us simpletons with what your definition of a so-called ‘kids’ language, even is. i think he just wanted to hear himself talk, just like i want to see myself write this stupid comment.
The guy who asked the first question showed a tremendous lack of knowledge and was very condescending calling Go a kids language.
Definitely, we must to find and punish him :)
Or maybe the opposite IMO. The question was simple why to use GO instead of JS with NodeJS for server stuff. Sergey seemed unable to answer with confidence that question. The answer hides deep inside the technology between NodeJS and Go. Also the argument that "Go is Safer" was just a "mambo jumbo" answer :)
@@Rambou92 afaik it’s safer than pure JS in that it’s typed and compiles, giving you compile time errors. Typescript exists for that reason if I’m not mistaken.
IMO he failed to respond with a better answer. The most critical advantage golang has over js is better multicore utilization, static binary generation, cross compilation for multiple architectures.
@@ppang i would argue Typescript is even safer due to it’s much stricter and advanced type system and algebraic data types
this is just plain beautiful.... sort of like duck typing
Very good talk.
But why not use frameworks if they makes life easier 😑.
At least logging and opentracing is a must be imho
How someone dare to say kids language and all, about Golang. See it is 100 times faster than Python with built in concurrency. It is kind of C language of modern times and see the great people behind i.t
Nice comparison. The speaker is good at explaining the differences and why Go is better.
The recommended Go talks in one playlist: ruclips.net/p/PLJSvlSLaxm_qEGubbNodHDEzCH3TbSYsO
Thanks for this! :)
seems like some things in the talk are not a true. He said you have to use interfaces in order to override "parent" methods, but how about methods shadowing? It works well without interfaces.
The question about constructors and "why Go works well without it" it's a bull**it, because he didn't show a default value for pointer, he created a new instance of the Car structure and took the address to it (car := &Car). var car *Car; printSpeed(car) will throw a panic because the variable car is nil and this is a true usage of default values in this example and there is no difference with Java
Yeah i was testing it and this code just does not work at all lol You cannot instantiate a struct with unexported fields outside his package. And if you are inside the package unexported properties are accessible anayway so you are not encapsulating anything with the getter method but just duplicating stuff for whatever reason
26:15 Only problem that I have with this talk is that this code is so small and hard to read that I must guess some part of it. Otherwise, very good talk.
Great talk: why apples (the fruits, not the lifestyle corp) are better than oranges. It would have been a big improvement to the talk if the speaker would have explained that there are different flavours or interpretations of oo, but unfortunately he seems to be stuck in Java? Another big improvement would have been if he would have applied Go's interpretation of oo (and it is also oo, unless you only see exactly one narrow version of oo as oo) to different types of projects. Then suddly the Go way isn't as easy, as some years of industrial and post-industrial practise might have to,d him before. Imho, a mediocre talk that does Go more harm than good. But time will tell.
sorry to be offtopic but does someone know a way to get back into an instagram account..?
I stupidly lost my account password. I appreciate any tips you can give me.
@Onyx Harper it did the trick and I actually got access to my account again. I'm so happy!
Thanks so much you saved my ass!
@Bradley Heath happy to help :)
Not a bad talk but quite biased
GUI
We use QML+GO as an OpenGL GUI for POS (Point of sale). Cheap hardware but still fast.
Nothing magical about Java annotations - if you understand how they work and the underlying e.g. GOF patterns. The "Java bad" slide really doesn't wash at all. BTW compiling to a little binary is so 1989.
Well, it's the ability to cross compile and make it work seamlessly
@@shiskeyoffles Pls qualify
SerGAY