3 Methods to Modeling Wood Decks in Revit Tutorial

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 8 июн 2024
  • In this Revit tutorial video I explore 3 methods to modeling wood decks in 3D! This tutorial was inspired by Angelo, who is a member of the BIM After Dark community. Angelo asked if anyone had "any tips or tricks for modeling decks to emulate the actually gaps and boards?"
    Join the BIM After Dark Community for full courses, support, and sample files today ! community.bimafterdark.com/
    Timestamps:
    00:00 Introduction
    01:08 Method 1 - Modeling Wood Decks in Revit Using Floors
    04:00 Method 2 - Modeling Wood Decks in Revit Using Beam Systems
    08:00 Method 3 - Modeling Wood Decks in Revit Using Curtain System Tool
    My Current Hardware/Software:
    My Main Revit Computer (BIMBOX) - bimbox.bimafterdark.com/
    How I Record My Tutorials (Camtasia Studio) - techsmith.z6rjha.net/zVvgW
    My Microphone (Blue Yeti USB) - amzn.to/3992DYy
    My Studio Headphones (Sennheiser HD 600) - amzn.to/2PxTFwj
    My Camera for Videos and Images (Canon EOS 80D) - amzn.to/32zbpg5
    The Lens I use for these videos (50mm) - amzn.to/3cvIE8D
    My Webcam for Webinars (Logitech C922X) - amzn.to/2wP3AHf
    My Favorite Sketchbook (“Blank” by 30x40) - amzn.to/32yAffZ
    My Favorite Sketching Pens (Sharpie “Fine”) - amzn.to/3c8r8qO
    Greatest Sketching Marker of All Time (Sign Pen) - amzn.to/3ceAukN
    ** Some of the above links are affiliate links, meaning you don’t pay anything more but I may get a small commission for a sale… Cheers! **
    Thanks for watching " 3 Methods to Modeling Wood Decks in Revit Tutorial " !!

Комментарии • 40

  • @matthewraye64
    @matthewraye64 День назад

    It is cathartic to see someone who’s seemingly very experience with this software also having to just jimmy rig this kind of stuff together, and shrugging away the many shortfalls of every function in this software and brute forcing solutions left and right

  • @thomashardy5524
    @thomashardy5524 Год назад

    THREE great easy methods! Thanks.

  • @amirhabibi9121
    @amirhabibi9121 11 месяцев назад

    The curtain panel roof method is actually pretty slick. Thanks for the video. Subscribed!

    • @TheRevitKid
      @TheRevitKid  11 месяцев назад +1

      Awesome, thank you!

  • @DefenseIsLacking
    @DefenseIsLacking Год назад +1

    The Revit Kid does it again. Great video!

  • @JoshuaDStewart
    @JoshuaDStewart Год назад +2

    Great video, and very timely as the next step on a current project is to build the deck! I usually use your first method, modeling it as a floor. On occasion I have used the dimensional lumber to model each board rotated 90 degrees, but rarely. I use LT so I can't do the beam system unfortunately. I love the curtain wall idea, I'm going to try that.

    • @TheRevitKid
      @TheRevitKid  Год назад

      Let me know how it goes !!

    • @JoshuaDStewart
      @JoshuaDStewart Год назад

      @@TheRevitKid That third option with the Roof by Footprint using Sloped Glazing worked great. Really quick to model (it was a simple design), just took a minute to work out the "mullion" sizing and the grid spacing for the deck boards. I will definitely be using this regularly now. Thank you!

    • @TheRevitKid
      @TheRevitKid  Год назад +1

      @@JoshuaDStewart Cheers! Yes, you have to massage the mullions for your use... You may even want to make a different mullion type if you're going to use borders, etc...

  • @eastudio-K
    @eastudio-K Год назад +3

    I see you were focusing on decking, was going to say structural post and beams and beam systems for main structure and Simpson strong ties plug in for post anchors and ties
    Detailing directly from model, not sure if that’s the most efficient off course I tend to over model for better or for worse
    I do always have issues with decking at ends, will try curtain system next time
    Thank you as always great content

    • @TheRevitKid
      @TheRevitKid  Год назад +1

      Agreed… I’m a big fan of “over modeling” in most cases… with enough interest maybe I will expand on this one and just do a video building an entire wood deck from scratch in Revit… seems like it would be valuable to many!

    • @seangassin958
      @seangassin958 8 месяцев назад

      Old comment, but I've also found it handy to make one off families that work with my normal families when I find new structural components or when I have to schedule them. For example, I add hangers onto the stock dim. lumber families as a shared family that can be turned on or off per side. That modified stock lumber family is now added to a random rvt that holds all my structural conditions for future use. Almost all my posts have top and bottom caps as a generic feature too. It isnt over modeling if you get to copy and paste it to make money off it :) Keep Calm and Model On

  • @ravensarkitv2519
    @ravensarkitv2519 Год назад +2

    For me, i prefer using generic model and use array tool to make a timber wood deck. 'Cause i find it hard to manipulate that beam system specially on the edge part

  • @mirakbar9029
    @mirakbar9029 8 месяцев назад

    that was great, i will practice it later today. thank you. I wish you could use metric units. in australia we use mm/m

    • @TheRevitKid
      @TheRevitKid  8 месяцев назад

      Haha sorry! I wish we used metric around here… but, my mind works on imperial.

  • @wafkt
    @wafkt 8 месяцев назад

    I’ve used beam system for this, but hadn’t considered using slopped glazing family for this. This would be ideal for composite deck with curved pieces.

    • @TheRevitKid
      @TheRevitKid  8 месяцев назад

      So glad it gave you some new ideas!!

  • @prolong835
    @prolong835 Год назад

    This is a great tutorial! Quick question. I would export this file to IFC and import it to neo4j. Can you also make a tutorial vdieo for that? thanks!

    • @TheRevitKid
      @TheRevitKid  Год назад

      Thanks for the kind words... I am not familiar with neo4j. Sorry!

  • @matthewbarnett8418
    @matthewbarnett8418 Год назад +2

    Any thoughts on just modelling in place? Possibly quicker and would allow greater control perhaps.

    • @xavierlanggaman8474
      @xavierlanggaman8474 Год назад +1

      It's easier for short term, if it's a sketch model that's fine, but you lose the ability to automatically revise a number/all of it by parameters and importantly - quantify by schedule.. Bottomline is it's no longer BIM 😁

    • @TheRevitKid
      @TheRevitKid  Год назад

      What he said... Except , I'll add... DO NOT MODEL SOMETHING LIKE THIS IN PLACE! :)

  • @ricardstridsberg571
    @ricardstridsberg571 Год назад

    When I modeled my wooden deck for my house, I did a structural beam system.
    I started thinking if it would be possible to add ‘Joints’ similar to Steel joints. But ‘wood joints’ such as L-shaped brackets or nails in the connections of the wood deck rafters.
    Any ideas?
    Maybe create a ‘steel beam’ that looks like Timber, and then create a ‘steel connection’ that looks like a L-shaped metal connection? :)

    • @TheRevitKid
      @TheRevitKid  Год назад +1

      Simpson has some decent families out there … I’ll see what I can dig up and maybe make a full video on wood decks

  • @duttique
    @duttique Год назад

    I just ran into this problem - Big thanks for the method). Is there a way to calculate deck lenght? for cost calculation (calculating by area isnt working some times)

    • @TheRevitKid
      @TheRevitKid  Год назад

      Of course, but, depending on which method you use it would be slightly different.

    • @duttique
      @duttique Год назад

      @@TheRevitKid curtain wall method looks the best of them

  • @AllenAngle
    @AllenAngle Год назад

    In all but the first option the decking is embedded into the framing, not above it. I think you said that is an issue for using a beam system. Is that also an issue for curtain, or can that be raised up to sit on framing?

    • @TheRevitKid
      @TheRevitKid  Год назад +1

      That is just simply because I did not offset either the beam system or the plank methods... its an easy fix for any of the methods... Either offset the 2x10 framing down lower or bring the floor/beam system/curtain wall higher... All three methods can have their offsets adjusted.

  • @kimgreen2244
    @kimgreen2244 Год назад

    Do you know if there is a way to apply and change materials when inserting an In -place mass that is from another program? I can only get it to show in default grey and don't have the material option available. I insert the model which is a 3D of a timber frame model by clicking in-place mass, then insert CAD and select dxf file

    • @TheRevitKid
      @TheRevitKid  Год назад +1

      It all depends on the file type and source… but it can be done. Check out this live stream I did last year that touches on a few different file types and processes to modify the materials: ruclips.net/user/livek7uj_XDnb6w?feature=share

  • @AnonymousUser_02
    @AnonymousUser_02 Год назад

    Where can you get those dimensional lumber families or do I have to create them??

    • @TheRevitKid
      @TheRevitKid  Год назад

      Right in Revit! just load the families from the out of the box family library!

  • @wrighthausracing9641
    @wrighthausracing9641 8 месяцев назад

    How about adding posts and beams and controlling its look and color on sheets with stick symbols 👍🏻

    • @TheRevitKid
      @TheRevitKid  8 месяцев назад

      That’s real easy when you use structural elements ….

  • @samuelbras1
    @samuelbras1 Год назад

    Would creating a family also work or is it less relevant/interesting?

    • @TheRevitKid
      @TheRevitKid  Год назад

      What kind of family would you create?

    • @samuelbras1
      @samuelbras1 Год назад

      @@TheRevitKid was thinking of nested family where you would have two arrays: one for the structure (like the beam system) and one for the flooring

    • @TheRevitKid
      @TheRevitKid  Год назад

      @@samuelbras1 Quite honestly, that's a waste of time when you have tools like beam systems and curtain systems... plus, the performance of an array family like that would make is a DOG to use.