Episode 154 ... Pragmatism and Truth
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 авг 2021
- Philosophize This! Clips: / @philosophizethisclips
Get more:
Website: www.philosophizethis.org/
Patreon: / philosophizethis
Find the podcast:
Apple: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/2Shpxw7...
RSS: www.philosophizethis.libsyn.org/
Be social:
Twitter: / iamstephenwest
Instagram: / philosophizethispodcast
TikTok: / philosophizethispodcast
Facebook: / philosophizethisshow
Thank you for making the show possible. 🙂
Fantastic to have ya back! Always miss you on these breaks my friend
Among the very best discussions of pragmatism ... fantastic! Thank you ...
You are one of my best friend or companions during the journey of my literary criticism I navigate from last forty year and I thank you from your voice how you sound musically to the ideas you share from axis to axis
Good to be back.
Great content as always
Missed these
•to underdtsnd sth is to nnow all the ways that thing has consequences on behavior and human
•when u believe in it or consider this a truth there are good results
•meaning is to be understood through action
And when the world needed him most...
Is this a re-upload? I loved your old lecture on pragmatism.
Another epic episode! :D
Free dopamine woooooooo
True that: actions speak louder than words. Bravo, pragmatists!
Instead of referring to "sick" souls, I use the word "wounded". People have wounded souls.
To pretend or assume, not admit, one’s will is free seems a more accurate description of the prerequisite in the process of choosing.
Got an odysee account?
We don't need free will to act. That's some fatalistic bull. We can be pragmatic about not having free will and act regardless. The thing that holds us back is fatalism not lack of free will.
That's fairly obvious, he's not really saying we need free will, just that we need to believe it's real to ever act in a meaningful way. What's actually fatalistic is not believing in something and doing it anyway, it's a contradiction in terms and action.
Around 2:40 you claim none of the thinkers thought of themselves as pragmatists but that statement doesn't seem to be accurate to me from my readings of William James. He seemed to be very consciously describing himself as a Pragmatist and defining the Pragmatic approach to life, philosophy and other sciences (especially psychology).
C.S Pierce > Richard Rorty