thank you very much! you earned a like and a new subscriber :D I love the little Latin lesson at the end part haha , definitely gonna use that a lot in our debates.
Amazing way of teaching. That is a very simple and concise way of delivering lectures even a shepherd can get it instantly. When I saw your channel history, there were only two videos unfortunately. I would like to suggest you to come back to your channel and work on it. Thanks.
the syllogism u mentioned should be like that (first form not a fourth which Aristotle didn't contain it in the valid syllogisms prior analytics) minor Socrates is a man major all men are mortal thus Socrates is mortal
Hey brother, I've watched a couple of your videos and I want to know how did you study the laws of logic? I am very interested in learning logic, and one-day teaching others, but I want to know a good place to start.
This is really helpful, can I ask you a question? is this a syllogism? All A is caused by B Therefore all cases of B result in A Is this a specific type of faulty reasoning? Hope you can help me, thanks
I think it's better if you work with "if p, then q" format. The words "cause" and "case" can be ambiguous. "if p, then q. Affirm p, q follows." Syllogism requires 3 terms.
All A is caused by B, but that doesn't mean that B causes only A. B can cause things other than A, so it isn't true that "all cases of B result in A". It may or may not be true.
А Вы в курсе, что уже разработана (аналогичная менделеевской) таблица для ЛОГИЧЕСКИХ ЭЛЕМЕНТОВ? (см. 07-04. ПЕРИОДИЧЕСКАЯ СИСТЕМА ЛОГИЧЕСКИХ ЭЛЕМЕНТОВ (ПСЛЭ): ruclips.net/video/S1YHvYEleto/видео.html ) и составлен список из 32-х типов суждений, включающих два понятия (две логических переменных)? (07-05. ПОЛНАЯ СИСТЕМА СУЖДЕНИЙ СИЛЛОГИСТИКИ ПСЛО-2: ruclips.net/video/QOmjAtANOvQ/видео.html ) А тут - о совместимости понятий: 06-09. АЛГЕБРАИЧЕСКИЙ РАСЧЁТ СИЛЛОГИЗМОВ - ЭТО ПРОСТО! (суждения, кванторы, модусы): ruclips.net/video/a8A3DI9qUYY/видео.html :-)
It's so great when people smack their lips or make that kissing sound when they want to punctuate a thought. Good God damn it if this video wasn't right with such. Amen I hope you learn to make your point with fewer mouth noises then just the words. Thank you for posting this video though.
خلاصة كتاب الرد على المنطقيين لإبن تيمية : قسم ابن تيمية المنطق إلى قسمين : القسم الأول : المنطق البشري ، وهو الذي يعرفه الناس قبل ارسطوا . وهذا لا خلاف بين البشر جميعهم في صحته . القسم الثاني : المنطق الأرسطي ، وهو الذي ابتكره ارسطوا . والمنطق الذي ابتكره ارسطوا هو أمران فقط ؛ وهما : الأمر الأول : الحد المنطقي . الأمر الثاني : القياس المنطقي . وهذان الأمران هما الذان تكلم عليما ابن تيمية في كتابه الرد على المنطقيين . فقال في الرد على الحد المنطقي : أنه يستحيل أن يُعَرَّف شيء بالحد المنطقي . وقال في الرد على القياس المنطقي ، أنه قياس صحيح ، لكن طريقة الوصول به إلى المطلوب عَسِرة ، ويحتمل الوقوع في الخطأ بسبب عسره . وخير منه قياس التمثيل الذي يستخدمه الفقهاء في الإستدلال ، ويتكلم عليه الأصوليين في أصول الفقه ضمن الأدلة الشرعية..............
A premise is a proposition that logically proves or supports a conclusion Conclusion is a proposition that logically follows from the premise Argument consist of a premise and a conclusion Syllogism consists of 3 propositions Major: All men are mortal Minor: Socrates is a man Conclusion: therefore, Socrates is mortal Show one of the premises is false Show that the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises Non sequitur - it does not follow Notes:
The claim that the fundemental difference between Humans and Animals is a claim frequently espouced. It's abjectly fallacious, though. First of all 'Humans' ARE animals, so the distinction you're making between the two is erroneous. But, HERE'S the interesting part. There was a Gorilla named Koko who gained considerable notoriety due to her impressively extstensive vocabulary that she communicated through 'Gorilla Sign Language'. It is said that her vocabulary exceeded 1, 000 words. The words were not exclusively nouns referencing tangible objects. She learned adjectives to express 'abstract' concepts. Ok... So... That may or may not impress you, BUT HOLD ON... THERE'S MORE! Her trainer was a Woman named Francine Patterson. I've seen some videos featuring the pair where Francine shares anecdotes and facts Re/ Koko's language comprehension. There was one video in particular that impressed me profoundly! The video may still be on RUclips, so don't hesitate to search for it. In this video, Francine speaks of Koko's Unbievable Ability to concoct 'COMPOUND WORDS' to convey something for which she had no 'signs' for. For instance, one day, Francine gave Koko a cookie or some treat that was 'stale'. Koko did not have a 'sign' to denote 'stale', so she 'signed' 'rock' and then 'candy'. Another example was pertained to a ring that Francine was wearing. Koko wanted to reference it, but she had no 'sign' for 'ring', so she ingeniously 'signed' 'finger' and 'bracelet'. So... You may or not consider the rudimentary 'signing' to qualify as 'reasoning', but surely you concede that her ability to CREATE HER OWN COMPOUND WORDS is proof positive that she was indeed using reason. That unbelievable feat cannot be accomplished devoid of the ability to reason. So... there you have it. I also recall seeing a video of an Orangutan picking up a saw and sawing a wooden board in half. The narrator explicitly mentioned that the Orangutan had NEVER seen anyone use a saw before. This wasn't was case of 'Ape See, Ape Do'. The Orangutan analyzed the properties of the tool and effectively reasoned that it would be suitable for 'cutting' boards into pieces. You might say, 'I think the narrator was lying'. Theoretically? But, why? What does some unknown, random narrator stand to gain by lying? Nothing. So, we may as well take him at his word. I'm very confident that you can find even more videos on You Tube of our Closest Genetic cousins (Chimpanzees, Bonobos, Orangutans, and Gorillas employing simple reasoning methodologies in order to accomplish very practical and downright impressive things. To put things in perspective, there are literally hundreds of millions of severely retarded humans who lack the cognitive wherewithal to not only create Compound Words, but to speak at all. So, don't downplay the intellectual advances of our Great Ape cousins. Yes, Animals are capable of abstract thought and using reason.
Hold on...animals do not use logic? So, when I someone scolds their puppy for wetting the floor...and the puppy runs away...but eventually "learns" not to wet said floor...there is no logic occurring within this puppy's thought processes? When a rat in a laboratory gets rewarded for pulling one lever, while getting nothing from another, there's no logic processing going on inside this rat's mind? I could cite a myriad of other example. Perhaps you'll label them "instinct," but I'd counterargue instinct is a natural reaction acquired through repeated experiences involving real-world outcomes. That said, I'm eager to watch the rest of your video. Now I understand your point: because some animals (humans are, by definition, animals), do not write down their logical processes, this supposedly negates their use of logic. I find this insulting to animals. Whales have incredibly-developed minds, communicate and reason, just as humans. Elephants also have the qualities of compassion. Your explanations, while sound, are perhaps dismissive regarding those with whom we share this planet. I realize I'm belaboring the point, but the point is: dismissing "other animals," we give license to those who harm this planet and the other creatures who share this world with us.
you've literally earned my respect for vividness, simplicity, and a bit of comedy infused with wits. wish teachers were all like this man.
This guy was years ahead with the timestamps
Richard, I teach logic and I love your presentation. It's accurate, easy to follow, and pleasant to view. I hope you make more like this.
Premise: Richard will do a video next week
Minor premise: it has been four years
Conclusion: the video must be around here somewhere
Somewhere
Thank you Richard, you are simply brilliant for simplifying the basics...I look forward for more videos from you.
You are a great teacher. I subscribed, liked, and here is my comment. Hope the algorithm serves you well.
Thank you!
i've been trying to understand this topic for weeks but i get so confused. this video somehow opened my third eye. thank you so much! bless you
I loved my logic and Latin classes in high school! I need to brush up on both! I went to a classical Christian high school.
Great, clear and simple introduction to logic.
for a graduate from UofT with such high achievements... you're an outlier and i like it
Thank you!
thank you very much! you earned a like and a new subscriber :D
I love the little Latin lesson at the end part haha , definitely gonna use that a lot in our debates.
I understood what my professor was trying to explain in 3 classes in 6 minutes . thank you!
Thank you! Glad it helped.
Man thank you some much every one else complicating things
Hey...hope you are still alive
Thanks! This helped me with my homework. I read many articles but being broken down and examples that you gave helped me.
Thank you! Glad it helped.
Thank you. Short and sweet explanations are the best.
Thank you Richard-excellent description !
very beautifully explained my friend. God bless
Thank you!
Great work
Thank you!
Thank you, needed this for my college entrance exam ❤
I like ur English as well as ur video
thank you random asian man. you helped me get an A for my essay.
I hope you're a teacher because that explanation was exactly what I was looking for
Amazing way of teaching. That is a very simple and concise way of delivering lectures even a shepherd can get it instantly. When I saw your channel history, there were only two videos unfortunately. I would like to suggest you to come back to your channel and work on it. Thanks.
Thank you very much!
Best! Please keep teaching us!
Thank you!
Bout to have an exam few days from now, this video helps me a lot, hope you doing well after all these times
Excellent explanations! Thank you!
thanks that was very informative and clearly explained. Also funny, great job!
Clear and well-explained. Well done. Also, top marks for using recycled paper.
Great explanation
Thank you!
Very clean and correct explication of Reason .
Thank You :)
Hi! Just saw this. Thank you for the simple explanation. Hope you'll continue making videos about logic :)
you're welcome! Thanks for the encouragement! I plan to start again very soon.
@@richardmin8694 Sure! Will definitely support it :)
We need more of this!!
Glad you enjoyed it.
very helpful, thanks!
You're welcome!
Richard, I love ur videos, I subscribed, like and here is my comment, I look forward for more videos
Thanks, this will help with my final
Amazing. Make more such
I like videos. This is a video. I like this
lol nice application
lol
Such clarity !! Thank you
cool video dude SHEEESH
Thank you so much man 🙏 really appreciate it
You're welcome!
Thank you so much. God bless you and all
Thanks❣️ it was great and clear. I have learned something today.
You must continue this channel
Thank you!
Your adorable! Old lady student here. Getting my bachelors in social work😌😉
Nothing is better than love.
Potato chips are better than nothing.
Therefore, potato chips are better than love.
you teach so well thank you so much!!
the syllogism u mentioned should be like that (first form not a fourth which Aristotle didn't contain it in the valid syllogisms prior analytics)
minor Socrates is a man
major all men are mortal
thus Socrates is mortal
Great 👍
Amazing ❤
Richard i miss you come back
Nice.
Amazing video
🔥🐐💯
So, the second vid isn't still out. After 4 years. Hehe ))) Maybe someday soon? 🥰
Haha I hope to do so relatively soon
@@richardmin8694 I've heard it somewhere... Lol. Good luck 🤞😃
This Video is So good
I want more videos on Logic, please!
Bro helped my homework
Your jawline is so sharp it could cut a tomato
Lol thank you
This was good.
Thanks for the video
thank you!
This is helpful
Nice!
How high must we be to notice the curvature of the earth?
lol, you made me laugh 💀 Non-sequitur
You are explaining better...make video on deductive logic and also on logical fallacies
Bob/cheeseburgers , 'conclusion' does not necessarily follow from given premise
It's easy to understand!
Nice
How did I land here,
What is Socrates
Can you recommend some good authors and books that help teach logic for homeschool kids?
Great video. Succinct
Thanks
Thank you for this
Hey brother, I've watched a couple of your videos and I want to know how did you study the laws of logic? I am very interested in learning logic, and one-day teaching others, but I want to know a good place to start.
This is really helpful,
can I ask you a question?
is this a syllogism?
All A is caused by B
Therefore all cases of B result in A
Is this a specific type of faulty reasoning?
Hope you can help me, thanks
I think it's better if you work with "if p, then q" format. The words "cause" and "case" can be ambiguous. "if p, then q. Affirm p, q follows." Syllogism requires 3 terms.
thank you
All A is caused by B, but that doesn't mean that B causes only A. B can cause things other than A, so it isn't true that "all cases of B result in A". It may or may not be true.
А Вы в курсе, что уже разработана (аналогичная менделеевской) таблица для ЛОГИЧЕСКИХ ЭЛЕМЕНТОВ? (см. 07-04. ПЕРИОДИЧЕСКАЯ СИСТЕМА ЛОГИЧЕСКИХ ЭЛЕМЕНТОВ (ПСЛЭ): ruclips.net/video/S1YHvYEleto/видео.html ) и составлен список из 32-х типов суждений, включающих два понятия (две логических переменных)? (07-05. ПОЛНАЯ СИСТЕМА СУЖДЕНИЙ СИЛЛОГИСТИКИ ПСЛО-2: ruclips.net/video/QOmjAtANOvQ/видео.html )
А тут - о совместимости понятий: 06-09. АЛГЕБРАИЧЕСКИЙ РАСЧЁТ СИЛЛОГИЗМОВ - ЭТО ПРОСТО! (суждения, кванторы, модусы): ruclips.net/video/a8A3DI9qUYY/видео.html
:-)
Epic
good
Thanks man
It's so great when people smack their lips or make that kissing sound when they want to punctuate a thought. Good God damn it if this video wasn't right with such. Amen I hope you learn to make your point with fewer mouth noises then just the words. Thank you for posting this video though.
😮❤
hi how can i contact this guy
Hello, I liked the video very much. Who is the quote he said at the beginning and what is it exactly? Can you write here?
Thank you! Isaac watts wrote the quote.
You said questions are not propositions, but you proceeded to ask a proposition question "how are you"... Answer can be true or false = proposition.
This guy faces discrimination in China for having those eyes
خلاصة كتاب الرد على المنطقيين لإبن تيمية :
قسم ابن تيمية المنطق إلى قسمين :
القسم الأول : المنطق البشري ، وهو الذي يعرفه الناس قبل ارسطوا . وهذا لا خلاف بين البشر جميعهم في صحته .
القسم الثاني : المنطق الأرسطي ، وهو الذي ابتكره ارسطوا .
والمنطق الذي ابتكره ارسطوا هو أمران فقط ؛ وهما :
الأمر الأول : الحد المنطقي .
الأمر الثاني : القياس المنطقي .
وهذان الأمران هما الذان تكلم عليما ابن تيمية في كتابه الرد على المنطقيين .
فقال في الرد على الحد المنطقي :
أنه يستحيل أن يُعَرَّف شيء بالحد المنطقي .
وقال في الرد على القياس المنطقي ، أنه قياس صحيح ، لكن طريقة الوصول به إلى المطلوب عَسِرة ، ويحتمل الوقوع في الخطأ بسبب عسره .
وخير منه قياس التمثيل الذي يستخدمه الفقهاء في الإستدلال ، ويتكلم عليه الأصوليين في أصول الفقه ضمن الأدلة الشرعية..............
You are so pretty 😊
Make more videos bro
Have you read Prior Analytics by Aristotle?
no i have not. But I really should! I've read his categories and some logic textbooks from the 17th century.
A premise is a proposition that logically proves or supports a conclusion
Conclusion is a proposition that logically follows from the premise
Argument consist of a premise and a conclusion
Syllogism consists of 3 propositions
Major: All men are mortal
Minor: Socrates is a man
Conclusion: therefore, Socrates is mortal
Show one of the premises is false
Show that the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises
Non sequitur - it does not follow
Notes:
The claim that the fundemental difference between Humans and Animals is a claim frequently espouced.
It's abjectly fallacious, though.
First of all 'Humans' ARE animals, so the distinction you're making between the two is erroneous.
But, HERE'S the interesting part.
There was a Gorilla named Koko who gained considerable notoriety due to her impressively extstensive vocabulary that she communicated through 'Gorilla Sign Language'.
It is said that her vocabulary exceeded 1, 000 words. The words were not exclusively nouns referencing tangible objects. She learned adjectives to express 'abstract' concepts.
Ok... So... That may or may not impress you, BUT HOLD ON... THERE'S MORE!
Her trainer was a Woman named Francine Patterson.
I've seen some videos featuring the pair where Francine shares anecdotes and facts Re/ Koko's language comprehension.
There was one video in particular that impressed me profoundly! The video may still be on RUclips, so don't hesitate to search for it. In this video, Francine speaks of Koko's Unbievable Ability to concoct 'COMPOUND WORDS' to convey something for which she had no 'signs' for.
For instance, one day, Francine gave Koko a cookie or some treat that was 'stale'. Koko did not have a 'sign' to denote 'stale', so she 'signed' 'rock' and then 'candy'.
Another example was pertained to a ring that Francine was wearing. Koko wanted to reference it, but she had no 'sign' for 'ring', so she ingeniously 'signed' 'finger' and 'bracelet'.
So... You may or not consider the rudimentary 'signing' to qualify as 'reasoning', but surely you concede that her ability to CREATE HER OWN COMPOUND WORDS is proof positive that she was indeed using reason. That unbelievable feat cannot be accomplished devoid of the ability to reason.
So... there you have it.
I also recall seeing a video of an Orangutan picking up a saw and sawing a wooden board in half. The narrator explicitly mentioned that the Orangutan had NEVER seen anyone use a saw before. This wasn't was case of 'Ape See, Ape Do'. The Orangutan analyzed the properties of the tool and effectively reasoned that it would be suitable for 'cutting' boards into pieces.
You might say, 'I think the narrator was lying'. Theoretically? But, why? What does some unknown, random narrator stand to gain by lying? Nothing. So, we may as well take him at his word.
I'm very confident that you can find even more videos on You Tube of our Closest Genetic cousins (Chimpanzees, Bonobos, Orangutans, and Gorillas employing simple reasoning methodologies in order to accomplish very practical and downright impressive things.
To put things in perspective, there are literally hundreds of millions of severely retarded humans who lack the cognitive wherewithal to not only create Compound Words, but to speak at all.
So, don't downplay the intellectual advances of our Great Ape cousins.
Yes, Animals are capable of abstract thought and using reason.
Major : God Is Love.
Minor : Love Is Blind.
Conclusion : Ray Charles Is God.
2:30 tongue click
and socrates is also dead now.
You need pictures in background.. lol
Hold on...animals do not use logic?
So, when I someone scolds their puppy for wetting the floor...and the puppy runs away...but eventually "learns" not to wet said floor...there is no logic occurring within this puppy's thought processes? When a rat in a laboratory gets rewarded for pulling one lever, while getting nothing from another, there's no logic processing going on inside this rat's mind? I could cite a myriad of other example. Perhaps you'll label them "instinct," but I'd counterargue instinct is a natural reaction acquired through repeated experiences involving real-world outcomes. That said, I'm eager to watch the rest of your video.
Now I understand your point: because some animals (humans are, by definition, animals), do not write down their logical processes, this supposedly negates their use of logic. I find this insulting to animals. Whales have incredibly-developed minds, communicate and reason, just as humans. Elephants also have the qualities of compassion. Your explanations, while sound, are perhaps dismissive regarding those with whom we share this planet.
I realize I'm belaboring the point, but the point is: dismissing "other animals," we give license to those who harm this planet and the other creatures who share this world with us.
How is all Socrates a man