February 23, 1967 - Attorney Mark Lane on the Jim Garrison Case and the death of David Ferrie
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 янв 2014
- Attorney Mark Lane interview regarding the Jim Garrison investigation and the death of David Ferrie in New Orleans. Lane says that the investigation "may be the most significant event, in terms of an investigation, since the assassination took place. The rest of us, evidently, are a bit more curious than the Warren Commission was."
Garrison knew something deeper was going on right in New Orleans A man with convictions I admired this man
Mark Lane was really one of the first people to publicly express doubt on the Oswald lone gunmen Kennedy Assassination Warren report. Which most Americans never believed either.
And what did it get him, forever labeled a "conspiracy theorist". Why? For having the courage to question the conclusions of the WC who seemingly beyond being questioned for their methods?
@@Autshot20999979
99
Is there a full video of this interview? And who is the man interviewing Mark Lane?
Hit was ordered by Ben Gurian, here's the shooters:
David Yardis
Danny Green
Robert Benard Baker
Laueren Hall
Lawrence Howard
Sergio Catch Smith
Emillo Santanna
Davie Ferrie
Jack Valenti
Layton Martens
Alvin Beauboeuf
Lenny Patrick
Evidence??
ben gurien indeed had him killed.
@@SeR-HaT bad hair ben gurien had him killed....dimona
I used to respect Lane till I found out he was fucking Jim Jones lawyer and was at Jonestown.
That doesn't make his JFK assassination suspicions and findings any less valid.
I believe it was an attempt to kill Lane
Pity Lane moved over to the Dark Side before he died
What do you mean? That Kool-Aid cult?
How?
No he didn't.
He friended and hung out a little with cult leader Jim Jones at his retreat in Guyana where the big massacre/suicide took place, 900+ dead. Lane was there and apparently knew most people there were being drugged and held against their will. He admitted he wouldn't eat the grilled cheese sandwiches they always served, apparently.
Let's no forget what Mark Lane would become: Jim Jones' attorney who fed him conspiracy theory paranoia helping to facilitate the mass murder of 900 people while Lane himself hid in the woods.
Um, no. Mae Brussell identifies Jonestown as a US Intel Josef Mengele /Nazi-type human experimentation on poor, North Cali, Black families: I believe HER
David Lomax Not true. In fact Mark Lane changed his story to fit his agenda. He was roundly criticized by many when he returned because they blamed him for telling the Congressman that Jim Jones wasn't a danger.
NYC Songman yes I belived her too.
TELEVISIONARCHIVES that you said isn"t relevant
Mr Mark Lane was a lawyer no autorithy the goverment was the responsable for do nothing about Jim Jones no any citizen no matter if he is a lawyer or another grade. then we can blame reporters,camermen congresman nope that is not the way things run.
@S.Adam Bernstein You're as bad as the people who Killed Kennedy. You're assassinating Mark Lane, s well deserved good name.
Jim Garrison was a nutcase.
Jimmy Hoffa said that anyone who thinks Garrison is a nut is a nut themselves.
Riiiiiight... And you know this how?
@@jimmycricket5366
He was certified by an Army doctor that he had a: "severe and disabling psychoneurosis" which "interfered with his social and professional adjustment to a marked degree. He was considered totally incapacitated from the standpoint of military duty and moderately incapacitated in civilian adaptability.
In short; he was nuts!
@@Ckom-Tunes Absolute rubbish. He remained extremely well composed, even when badgered in the court room and even worse in the media. Garrison was very sober-minded, controlled and erudite.
@@jimmycricket5366
You can’t change facts simply because you don’t like them.
In the early months of this publicity stunt that got out of had he claimed that the assassination was a “homosexual thrill killing!” Do you think that comment came from a stable, erudite man?!
Or how about, as prosecutor, you subject your own witness to “objectifying tests” such as; hypnosis, polygraph tests, AND Sodium Pentothal injections!
Then, mysteriously, the source notes found themselves incinerated-as you do with any evidence that doesn’t support your claims. Garrison was trying to induce testimony in a witness. It’s not something a member of the judicial system would, or has, used on a legitimate witness!
Garrison used his position to intimidate witnesses. He would twist testimony then when a witness attempted to retract or clarify his testimony in a way that hurt Garrison’s case he would threaten the witness with charges of perjury-ironic since the original, coerced, testimony was the perjured testimony!
I could go on and on but you don’t care. Your confirmation bias won’t allow you to admit to yourself that Garrison was an evil man who used his position to destroy innocent lives! Clay Shaw is the prime example of the effect Garrison had on perverting justice!
All you have to do is watch garrison on THE TONIGHT SHOW you can see by his posture he was a loony tune
Wrong.
@@watermelonlalala Right, and he was telling *demonstrable* lies.
Might have had something to do with Carson, repeatedly asking him, "Is that a fact or your opinion", knowing Garrison could NOT go into the details of the case. Not quite sure what he lied about.
@@Autshot20 Garrison never went into the "details" of his B.S. case as long as he lived.
He lied about the parade route being changed, about the tramps not being ID'd and cleared, about Oswald being photographed in the TSBD doorway, etc.
Most of his witnesses were discredited on the stand and his star witness Russo was so full of it even Oliver Stone didn't dare include him in his rubbish movie.
What Garrison *did* do is publicly accuse all of the following as being party to conspiracy and cover-up: Johnny Carson, NBC, Lyndon Johnson, Bobby Kennedy, Ronald Reagan, Ramsey Clark, Earl Warren, CBS, NASA, the FBI, CIA, neo-Nazis, the John Birch Society, the White Russian Community, the telephone company ("an extension of the United States Government, of what is now a super state"), Henry Hurt and Anthony Summers (conspiracy authors critical of him whose books were thus written at the behest of the CIA), the Dallas Police Department, Newsweek, the Los Angeles Times, the Washington Post, the 13 State Regional Democratic Organization, the governors of Ohio and Nebraska, the Secret Service, Cuban guerrillas, the entire bipartisan Warren Commission, the oil industry, the Aerospace industry, and, of course, "the homosexuals."
@@aaronz7056 I don't think he accused Neo-Nazis. Look, we all know today the media cooperates with the government, and is infiltrated by the government, to put out official versions of what happened. So, there would be no mystery in all the government and all the media working together. Also, major authors would be part of the same "Deep State" crew. Anyone who reads the original books will wonder what the hell the White Russians and a number of other strange churches were up to, ditto for the Dallas police. The Secret Service, the FBI and the CIA all acted like they were guilty. Also, look at the homosexuals of today, they are very politically active and who is to say they weren't in the days of Kennedy? Garrison looked at anomalies, he was way ahead of the curve.