Tap to unmute

Why Evolution Abandoned Armor

Share
Embed
  • Published on Feb 17, 2026
  • Animals used to be covered in tons of hard shells and other defense, but now they're just... squishy? Why become so easy to eat?
    Business inquiries: beyondtheblue.biz@gmail.com
    If I have used any clips that belongs to you but have neglected to credit you please contact me so I can credit you.

Comments •

  • @GenomicWizard
    @GenomicWizard Month ago +1485

    it's like in every single game, it starts with tank meta, and then it's mobility creep and damage creep everywhere

    • @danielmorganson9349
      @danielmorganson9349 Month ago

      Mobility creep is soooo aids also

    • @vyxzil7
      @vyxzil7 Month ago +9

      War thunder

    • @samryan180
      @samryan180 Month ago +1

      What games?

    • @danielwoods3896
      @danielwoods3896 Month ago +9

      League of Legends lol

    • @prisonbread
      @prisonbread Month ago +90

      Still waiting for nature to come up with a ranged build
      Edit: I’ve just discovered an ocean snail variety called the “cone snail” that may have a harpoon-based ranged build. Still researching.

  • @romgl4513
    @romgl4513 Month ago +2603

    Interesting observation, the human warriors went the same way, developing and perfecting armor for centuries, but eventually discarding it, mostly. Now we can see some limited armor renaissance.

    • @Skeloperch
      @Skeloperch Month ago +138

      Tanks, for example, have been mostly obsoleted by lightly armored vehicles. See: The Toyota War; a bunch of Chadians in a Toyota Hilux were able to outpace and outflank the Libyan tanks and ended up defeating the numerically superior Libyan army.

    • @jonathanweinberg2874
      @jonathanweinberg2874 Month ago +18

      @Skeloperchor like a tank vs a drone

    • @thirdpiecery
      @thirdpiecery Month ago +110

      Humans didn't discard armor, they just compacted it.

    • @NR-fd9wv
      @NR-fd9wv Month ago +288

      the difference is that humans didn't discard armor, because it made them slow, they did it, because they invented weapons that could break any armor.

    • @Ezullof
      @Ezullof Month ago +16

      For completely different reasons though. Humans temporarily discarded armour because of artillery and guns. There's no equivalent to that in nature.

  • @Cec9e13
    @Cec9e13 Month ago +885

    The most OP strategy of all .... Turning.
    Okay, that's really funny.

    • @crimsonemperor2219
      @crimsonemperor2219 Month ago +30

      Does that mean that Nascar drivers are the most OP animals in the world? All they do is make left turns

    • @FirstTheory1
      @FirstTheory1 Month ago +9

      @crimsonemperor2219 always on the defensive

    • @MrCoalmin
      @MrCoalmin Month ago +2

      i bet you laugh at your own jokes

    • @asddrobt56roblox65
      @asddrobt56roblox65 Month ago +5

      @MrCoalminbro laughed while commenting that 😭 ✌️

    • @XEG_H
      @XEG_H Month ago +1

      @MrCoalmin actually i fart at my own jokes. better luck next time

  • @teck8777
    @teck8777 Month ago +1703

    So they disappeared because of the power creep.
    Once the glass canon build appeared, it killed the Meta and made all the other builds unusable.

  • @zakary6526
    @zakary6526 Month ago +853

    Arthropods like insects "why not have both speed and armor?"

    • @camramaster
      @camramaster Month ago +73

      But smol though

    • @lamia197
      @lamia197 Month ago +40

      @camramaster And nearly everywhere.

    • @Ezullof
      @Ezullof Month ago +28

      """armour"""
      If your armour is not effective against your main predators, does it really qualify as armour? Would you say that human skulls are armour?

    • @nathanielFalck
      @nathanielFalck Month ago +57

      @Ezullof It's pretty effective against other animals in their weight class, i.e. other insects. That's not nothing.

    • @FrogsAreGods
      @FrogsAreGods Month ago +49

      @Ezullof Human skulls are very much armor, yes. It's really hard to defend a brain but the skull does a real damn good job of it.

  • @Chair-by-a-bench
    @Chair-by-a-bench Month ago +327

    The Joestar technique always wins.

    • @boi7316
      @boi7316 Month ago +36

      NIGERUNDAYOOOO

    • @scientistx5717
      @scientistx5717 Month ago +3

      I sinned I broke the perfect 100 like stalemate

    • @unholycrusader69
      @unholycrusader69 Month ago

      ​@boi7316 SMOKEYYY 💯🗣️💯📢🔥⁉️‼️‼️‼️⁉️🗣️🔥

  • @RiggyRonnie
    @RiggyRonnie Month ago +463

    Because counterwise animals evolved to crack the armor and eat it, eating all of the armored ones and leaving the agile ones that could escape

    • @Δ-Δ-Δ-Δ
      @Δ-Δ-Δ-Δ Month ago +21

      I wonder how we as humans are gonna evolve if things were to keep going the way they are.
      I wonder how global warming may change our skin, so much techno-waves may affect us or how earphones could change our ears.

    • @Karthull
      @Karthull Month ago +33

      Evolution takes to long for such things, look at isolated tribes that have been isolated for thousands of years. Outside of culture they’re no different from humans anywhere else in the world aside from slight variance in skin tone

    • @ghostguy76
      @ghostguy76 Month ago +14

      @Δ-Δ-Δ-Δvery little sadly, evolution isn’t some fictional like adaption ability, it’s a product of how animals reproduce. We as a species are getting rid of our own selection pressures, think of your hair, it can grow far too long so why hasn’t it been evolved away? Because we started cutting it. We will likely develop the ability to manipulate our own genetics well before we’d evolve to anything, if there even were any selection pressures.

    • @10dollarsteakneggs86
      @10dollarsteakneggs86 Month ago

      Increased sickle cell Is a more recent one to protect from malaria

    • @abetobykakekapetum8828
      @abetobykakekapetum8828 Month ago +1

      ​​@KarthullWe are still young as a species yes we are able to evolve but it depends on the environment u live in and it will take many generations even 1000 years to see any changes or adaptations... in 1000 years from now if we still here, people would change or evolved due to what we are exposed to.... we already are still evolving but its a very very slow process

  • @ambroz-xd
    @ambroz-xd Month ago +237

    0:17 mammals 450 million years ago, yeah right

    • @RandomlyRandomThings
      @RandomlyRandomThings Month ago +6

      I’m assuming what would soon (not soon really) to be mammals.

    • @ambroz-xd
      @ambroz-xd Month ago +20

      ​@RandomlyRandomThings That's still a stretch, first amphibians came to be around 90 million years after...

    • @hezzblock
      @hezzblock Month ago

      the farthest I could find as a mammal was 200 mya

    • @lancetherocketscietistgaming
      @lancetherocketscietistgaming Month ago

      ​@ambroz-xd bro acts like lobed finned fish dont exist

    • @VincentOak
      @VincentOak Month ago +57

      Im assuming either bad research or AI
      maybe both?

  • @zakary6526
    @zakary6526 Month ago +138

    Humans are a really good example of this. The tight skin + lack of fur allowed us sweat with easy efficiency, spend less resources on growing extra in addition making it easier for us to wear clothes/ actual armor (our own armor) when necessary.

    • @MrCmon113
      @MrCmon113 Month ago +10

      Humans already had skin like that prior to clothing and armour and all apes seem to have pretty tight skin.

    • @millionpulses
      @millionpulses Month ago +5

      It's not at all that great. There's a good reason why heavy sweating isn't popular in the animal kingdom, and the loss of fur prevented hominins from colonizing the northern hemisphere for a long time and was a compromise when our ancestors weren't yet intelligent enough to invent projectile weapons and clothes.

    • @varvarvarvarvarvar
      @varvarvarvarvarvar Month ago +1

      Lack of fur has to do with self-domestication that causes infantilization. As in literally adult species becoming infant-like (no hair, bigger head to body ratio). It's an adaptation to lack of predation that can also be observed in animals like elephants.

    • @zeno4538
      @zeno4538 24 days ago +2

      ​@varvarvarvarvarvar I'm gonna offer a different explanation. Humans became really good marathon hunters. We could run down any animal and eventually catch it. Our endurance was unmatched by any animal at the time. Because of our ability to self cool using sweat and lack of fur. Thats why we lost it all, to further deepen our endurance advantage and marathon pack hunting.

    • @varvarvarvarvarvar
      @varvarvarvarvarvar 24 days ago

      @zeno4538 I prefer more universal explanations personally. I think we saw that same pattern when domesticating foxes. It was really funny became the reason they were domesticating foxes was to farm them for luxurious furs and wanted to have an easier time working with the foxes. But domesticated foxes produced furs of much poorer quality.

  • @queenfisher7seas
    @queenfisher7seas Month ago +105

    9:47 “we live in the age of the glass cannon” I love this sentence as it ties so well with the idea of animals evolving to have little to no armor but becoming efficient when it comes to speed and power! ❤

  • @starsilverinfinity
    @starsilverinfinity Month ago +70

    As any gamer can tell you, the best defense is not being hit at all

    • @thequestionrants
      @thequestionrants 13 days ago

      Is that a let me solo her reference ?

    • @Jimverse-v6m
      @Jimverse-v6m 12 days ago +1

      ​@thequestionrants not necessarily. this is true for every other game

    • @Joshh97
      @Joshh97 7 days ago

      and some says the best defence is a good offense lols.

    • @Jimverse-v6m
      @Jimverse-v6m Day ago

      ​@Joshh97 haha that's equally true

  • @florenmage
    @florenmage Month ago +109

    If a shelled animal could evolve large spikes the large predator would be less inclined to ram it.

    • @benginaldclocker2891
      @benginaldclocker2891 Month ago +40

      That wouldn't be evolutionarily possible as it would hamper the hydrodynamics of the animal.
      inb4 you could argue that Sea Urchins and Pufferfish have spikes, but that's irrelevant as Sea Urchin don't need speed to move around and Pufferfish can retract their spikes when not inflated.

    • @Charumiyu
      @Charumiyu Month ago +1

      @b@benginaldclocker2891n’t that why the pufferfish evolved to.. puff?

    • @benginaldclocker2891
      @benginaldclocker2891 Month ago +4

      ​@Charumiyu Exactly, but I was replying to people beforehand who might use the pufferfish as an example (I am 100% sure that someone would based on how some people don't think critically)

    • @FrogsAreGods
      @FrogsAreGods Month ago +2

      The orca would then hit it with its tail and throw it at a rock or something, they are really smart

    • @florenmage
      @florenmage Month ago +2

      @FrogsAreGods Maybe but then it would have an injured tail because if the spikes.
      If it rammed it the orca would have a bloodied face.

  • @orangefruit374
    @orangefruit374 Month ago +14

    Spending millions of years of evolution just to discover gunpowder..

  • @pipecleanermaster
    @pipecleanermaster Month ago +63

    To be fair snails, crabs, turtles roaches and many types of beetles depend quite a lot on their armor

  • @MrDjfredde711
    @MrDjfredde711 Month ago +21

    1:05 I was so into prehistoric creatures as a kid that I immediately recognized that as a dunkleosteus.

    • @Basically_Average
      @Basically_Average 27 days ago +3

      Everybody as a kid were really interested with prehistoric animals for some reason,including myself who watched a hell ton of megalodon vids

    • @-_Blitz_-
      @-_Blitz_- 11 days ago

      I did from hungry shark lmao

  • @RandomlyRandomThings
    @RandomlyRandomThings Month ago +21

    5:30 , I’m pretty sure goku used this technique to become unkillable.

  • @ianmccourry9337
    @ianmccourry9337 Month ago +9

    It is interesting how most cephalopods got rid of their armor. They literally engulfed it into their mantle over millions of years and then dissolved it

  • @Joargeh
    @Joargeh Month ago +14

    The way this script is written kinda leads me to believe that it was AI generated

    • @Thor_dude1234
      @Thor_dude1234 Day ago +1

      They talk on and on about the same thing. AI slop keeps wasting my time.

  • @greak7116
    @greak7116 Month ago +14

    Nice video. I'm glad you pointed out shark denticles later on - I never thought of sharks as being naked, not compared with us, anyway.
    The most naked animals (aside from mole rats) are humans and octopuses. We use our brains to put our bodies in the most inconvenient places for predators.

  • @muffinperson236
    @muffinperson236 Month ago +22

    10:08 My head is also mostly full of junk.

  • @bababoi913
    @bababoi913 22 days ago +8

    4:22 sounds relatable

  • @DhakaHyanataR
    @DhakaHyanataR Month ago +6

    Now this is simmilar to evolution of warships. They build armor and make battleship at the cost of speed, but now speedy, smaller and stealthier ships is the way to go. I wonder what comes next in the evolutionary race

  • @ArigatoPlays
    @ArigatoPlays Month ago +154

    This video completely misses a hugely important fact: fossilization bias. Why do we know of so many fossilized animals that had armour, but so few animals that have it today? Because armoured part fossilize so much easier. That's it. That's the reason. The time we live in is not some sort of special metagame of live that makes armoured animals unviable (well, we kind of do, but that's mostly related to ocean acidification), we are just able to see all the unarmoured animals that are alive right now. Hundreds of millions of years ago there also were unarmoured animals, but the vast majority of them never fossilized, so we only know a few that were buried in the right sediment at the right time through sheer luck.

    • @surcrys
      @surcrys Month ago +7

      but still in the end mostly in todays meta the animals choose to have naked build regardless. if its just about fossil, why there isn't more armored builds around? the number is not even close. the fossil thing can be true, sure. but in the end, right now the most chosen build is lightness, INT, stealth, agility and naked.

    • @Artj3o
      @Artj3o Month ago +19

      He missed a fact, you missed the entire point

    • @TestGoogle-jh5hw
      @TestGoogle-jh5hw Month ago +9

      ​@Artj3o both missed each others

    • @damonedrington3453
      @damonedrington3453 Month ago +17

      The problem is that there’s just way too many fossils with armor. We can expect, based on the region and the time period we’re looking for, a rough range of how many fossils we should find per time. And there’s just way too many armored to fossils for it to just be a case of. They happen to fossilize more often. It goes doubly so when you consider that we can analyze the fossils of predators and see that they very clearly had adaptations for dealing with said armor, which would not be the case unless it was pretty common.

    • @Karthull
      @Karthull Month ago +3

      Don’t forget that even with armor fossilizing easier only like 1% of things fossilize at all period. Then of those only a small percent stay and don’t get destroyed over time. Then of those how many can we actually find because they aren’t at the bottom of the ocean or under someone’s house? We have an absurdly low sample size when it comes to all prehistoric life

  • @yaasinm
    @yaasinm Month ago +18

    Thought I was watching @a curious bird again …

    • @DovakinLP
      @DovakinLP Month ago

      My first thought as well...i mean it has some added context here and there...but come on, some lines basically are the same if you watch both videos back to back. Thats called plagiarism.

    • @yaasinm
      @yaasinm Month ago

      @DovakinLP Yep. I just downvote videos like these. From now on I will watch closely if he’s copying another video. Lazy.
      ( it’s also funny how this video was stolen as well by @dipper than blue )

  • @demonseed360
    @demonseed360 Month ago +9

    NGL, Placoderm is a badass name for a heavily armored/invincible superhero

  • @amos5161
    @amos5161 Month ago +3

    If I run fast enough no problem can catch up to me 😅

  • @drakonotdraco
    @drakonotdraco 3 days ago

    this channel gives me Animal Planet nostalgia, love it

  • @Literally_a_trout
    @Literally_a_trout Month ago +1

    This channel feels like a gem bro, I love this! Please never stop making content

  • @jaytee9111
    @jaytee9111 Month ago +11

    I thought everything's final form was crab?
    Oh, you mentioned it.

  • @jasoncarto
    @jasoncarto Month ago +12

    A better question would be what evolutionary pressure forced everything to acquire armor in the first place

    • @paulciampo2104
      @paulciampo2104 Month ago +7

      Lack of agility and possibly size, with early arms race

    • @angrymokyuu9475
      @angrymokyuu9475 Month ago +6

      Armor is biologically simple and doesn't require any major changes; add some heavy calcification to the outside of your body and you have armor. Speed requires streamlining, the evolution of the correct type of muscle, etc and so is a much more expensive change.

    • @Ysumbruh0
      @Ysumbruh0 27 days ago

      Looking at those creatures in the early age you’d know why

  • @johnlemonchannel
    @johnlemonchannel Month ago +3

    The best defense is not getting hit at all

  • @petchp.k.1171
    @petchp.k.1171 Month ago +2

    Basically aquatic animals changed meta from def to dex and lands changed from dex and str to int and stam.

  • @FreakyOddities
    @FreakyOddities 27 days ago

    This video felt like a journey into another world

  • @Cec9e13
    @Cec9e13 Month ago +30

    Dunkleosteus was SO. COOL.

    • @couchfort3162
      @couchfort3162 Month ago +4

      Fastest biting speed with a strong jaw and armour? Yeah god HAD to nerf it

  • @SRDPS2
    @SRDPS2 Month ago +2

    "hello animal from nature born"
    "hello ship from man-made object"
    > evolve armor to zero

  • @SonofSugiono
    @SonofSugiono Month ago +8

    so even the prehistoric era has meta to follow.

  • @OvisMilitaris
    @OvisMilitaris 24 days ago +5

    Meanwhile the insects said: "We can have armor, breed exponentially, and FLY at the same time."

  • @a_literal_brick
    @a_literal_brick Month ago +2

    Muscle itself works as decent armor as well. It's not ideal to lose a chunk of it obviously, but living muscle tissue is pretty difficult to rip through and will protect your organs from a weak or poorly placed bite

  • @zakary6526
    @zakary6526 Month ago

    Very interesting video and quite logical

  • @bigman-uj8xy
    @bigman-uj8xy Month ago +1

    i love the idea of the meta evolving throughout ancient history

  • @Chansopoohpropro
    @Chansopoohpropro Month ago +2

    1:05 hungry shark mentioned

  • @Zeyror185
    @Zeyror185 Month ago

    Great video!

  • @fallbranch
    @fallbranch Month ago +3

    It's the dps meta, I swear.

  • @combat_gaming-h7u
    @combat_gaming-h7u 26 days ago

    Nice peace of the puzzle bro thanks ❤

  • @Gemini_2k
    @Gemini_2k Month ago +2

    Armor only died off because the species that evolved it got whipped of the map by a random space rock and no other reason.

  • @nyalasteve99
    @nyalasteve99 Month ago +59

    The most ai strategy of all, half an hour ads for a 10 minute without a voice video on something actually interesting.

    • @banjohakkin
      @banjohakkin 20 days ago +1

      what?

    • @nyalasteve99
      @nyalasteve99 13 days ago +1

      ​@banjohakkinI was unhinged at the moment. Sorry, still stands tho even if I can't see the video 😂

    • @forêtdepommes
      @forêtdepommes 10 days ago +4

      are u watching this high? what are u on

  • @Carlishere11663
    @Carlishere11663 19 days ago

    Back in my day ahh video

  • @pearlsight
    @pearlsight Month ago +1

    for a brick, he swam pretty good

  • @Agent_E1994
    @Agent_E1994 8 days ago

    Animals with hard shells also need to molt or change into another shell at some point as they grow.
    It's basically a free dinner during that time.

  • @gustavolemos5913
    @gustavolemos5913 Month ago

    how did they become so common then in the first place? before they vanish

  • @Песни_без_прописки

    Meanwhile everything is becoming armored crabs...

  • @زيزوالحلاوي-ف9ش

    ‏‪0:00 Felt like yesterday, yeah.

  • @danaanderson1199
    @danaanderson1199 7 days ago +1

    Ever heard of the Nautilus?

  • @FionaShrekson
    @FionaShrekson 11 days ago +1

    Yeah bro in top tier armor is obsolete

  • @NottXim
    @NottXim 7 days ago

    This is really interesting!

  • @Zero_Percent00
    @Zero_Percent00 Month ago +2

    waiting for the next patch note rn, they'll probably nerf orcas and crabs

  • @bassault
    @bassault 16 days ago

    Interesting that still a few armored designs survive.
    Also in freshwater there are many armored fish like catfish. Although it isn't as armored as these ancient ocean fish.

  • @hinaali827
    @hinaali827 Month ago +3

    Your videos are amazing, I have been subscribed since some weeks, and I find myself getting excited about your new videos. Your videos are one of my favorite!! Arigatou gozaimasu, oniisaan.

  • @paulciampo2104
    @paulciampo2104 Month ago +1

    This does answer why Sharks have such high powered bites...

  • @lowlight1063
    @lowlight1063 9 days ago

    Makes sense! Even in video games a glass cannon would wipe out a whole squad, while a tank would just survive for a lot

  • @heavensfield494
    @heavensfield494 Month ago +1

    Tank builds doesn’t work without regenerative stats

  • @realpomagranite_titan4919

    Wanna know whats better then being able to take a hit? Not getting hit.

  • @billydiesel8520

    I can't imagine worse music to use with this video. Well done.

  • @ricardoescalona267
    @ricardoescalona267 10 days ago

    There are environments which favour armour, for example lots of catfish like pleco have been infesting Florida because few animals can actually get through their armour plus they don’t have much meat so they aren’t worth the trouble most of the time

  • @dinomaniac1573
    @dinomaniac1573 Month ago +1

    Funny enough, armour didn't dissapeared in most vertebrates but rather it became an inner structre designed to protect the brain and to enhance the feeding skills

  • @solaireofcatarina44
    @solaireofcatarina44 Month ago +9

    Was this ai grnerated or assisted? Somewhat feels like it

  • @Humuhumunukunukuapaa
    @Humuhumunukunukuapaa 16 days ago

    “Where speed and intelligence doesn’t matter”
    The humble insect world vibing in armour.

  • @dindin3655
    @dindin3655 5 days ago

    It's also exactly like Battle Tanks that are slowly getting replaced for being easily destroyed by small cheap drones.

  • @dingdingdong2697
    @dingdingdong2697 7 days ago +8

    0:10 I thought something fell lol

  • @QuangMinhTrần-c6q

    If u guys think that's cool I can add them back

  • @idk_any_names2992
    @idk_any_names2992 4 days ago +1

    ik ima sound like a dck but the weirdly places emphasises and pauses are so damn unsettling. Dont need near as many, especially in such peculiar spots. That paired with the constant repetition feels like you are just trying to make a longer video for the sake of it.
    Still a fun watch tho :)

  • @Nagiseishiroda2123
    @Nagiseishiroda2123 23 days ago

    turning no ankle breaking yes

  • @OceanHedgehog
    @OceanHedgehog 21 day ago

    This is also how battleships developed and then became obsolete.

  • @kemp10
    @kemp10 Month ago

    Bc they keep running into armor-geddon

  • @huonglarne
    @huonglarne 6 days ago

    nice vid

  • @IvanJoshi-x2f
    @IvanJoshi-x2f Month ago

    honestly i think armoure creatures could exist in the deep sea as the environment there is very slow moving considering that we havent discovered like 80 percent of the ocean it is a possibility

  • @jogzyg2036
    @jogzyg2036 20 days ago +1

    Just paint the armour red. Then you go fastah.

  • @theislandbros4412
    @theislandbros4412 12 days ago

    I think tanks are evolving the same way, from the super heavy s/ slow tanks of WW1/2, made to stop most things coming for them (even medium tanks) to the modern MBT, able to be pierced, but really fast and a lot of firepower

  • @SilverStarHeggisist
    @SilverStarHeggisist 11 days ago

    This is like how in WWII tank armor got progressively thicker and thicker, designed to counter hardened heavy AP tank shot. But then along came HEAT-FS which could punch through steel armor so thick that tanks wouldn't be able to move with enough armor to block it. So for a time tanks like the Leopard 1 kinda stopped having armor, opting for 80mm or less of light armor, so things like small arms and anti tank rifles couldn't do much, but really any anti tank weapon could go through, opting instead to rely on mobility to not get hit in the first place. And even today, armor in the form of passive heavy steel plates, never really returned.

  • @armsregkralkidna1359

    Why deep ocean animal so large? Are they have different META?

  • @kang3576
    @kang3576 7 days ago

    Interesting now, modern wars are fought with small explosive drones and short coordinated attacks

  • @nerdhere3209
    @nerdhere3209 Month ago +2

    Found your script
    ruclips.net/video/VoHcQuzlJBY/video.htmlsi=oFFmgcYmLG7L-N6U

  • @Highsie5k
    @Highsie5k Month ago

    animal had meta tactic too i see

  • @epiconion9370
    @epiconion9370 Month ago +2

    No more tank meta

  • @hogwater
    @hogwater Month ago

    Something also interesting is how so many snails managed to get rid of their shells. Many more species substantially shrank their shells, but they haven't had as much reproductive success.

  • @4stringed
    @4stringed 22 days ago +3

    Actual question - is this voice AI? It doesn’t seem fake but I can‘t believe my ears anymore

    • @Blobface101
      @Blobface101 19 days ago

      Not only is the voice AI, but so is the script

  • @James-j5f3v
    @James-j5f3v 10 days ago

    What about pangolins and armadillo’s

  • @andrewstrongman305
    @andrewstrongman305 Month ago +1

    The main weakness even of the "Armoured-fish" was their rear sections, which were simply scaled like other fish. Those who had the speed and agility to evade the jaws or hunt the armoured fishes from behind ended their reign. An orca today _would never_ "headbut" a dunkleosteus, it would cripple the armoured fish by attacking it's fins and tail, before eating the prized parts. Larger shark species would do pretty much the same, possibly even initiating a frenzy. Whatever, a living "Dunk" today would last not much longer than the first big marine predator detecting it.

  • @Thortawar
    @Thortawar 14 days ago

    Counterpoint: crabs and crocodiles, two of the most stable and successful designs, both have lots of armor.

  • @avalope
    @avalope Month ago

    Im predicting a ranged meta in a billion years. Doesnt matter if you can one shot close range if you fight a ranged opponent

  • @justsomeguywithoutalove

    “Best block…no be there!” - Mr. Miyagi

  • @antonquynhpham3615

    This video made me realize that real life tank warfare is slowly changjng in the same way. Just being armored isnt enough, armor priecing and drone warfare are catching up.

  • @TheFlyingSailorYT
    @TheFlyingSailorYT Month ago

    For the most part the Tank class is just not fun to play and maintain. Damage or Support are the best classes.

  • @DaisukeCG3
    @DaisukeCG3 Month ago

    they just figured out the new meta

  • @ShenBinhao
    @ShenBinhao 6 days ago

    “A real man never hinds in the bush” Tigreal, mlbb.

  • @TylerBrown-s4q
    @TylerBrown-s4q Month ago +1

    It took me way too long to realize that this is entirely ai. Its getting way too good

  • @slothgeneral4144
    @slothgeneral4144 Month ago +1

    Turtles laughing in the back

  • @Jimverse-v6m
    @Jimverse-v6m 12 days ago

    Hi, this was a very interesting deep dive into the biological armors! I’m actually a new creator and this video inspired me a lot to start working on a similar project. Thank you for the great info and the spark of inspiration! 🙏

  • @noheadshotbear4254

    A new creator that goes by A Curious Birb made a video on the exact same topic of armor a few weeks ago and I’d highly suggest u watch. I have a feeling this guy stole his idea/video considering the layout of this video is strikingly familiar. His channel also has a lot of other interesting animal videos if ur into that.

  • @Yahegaoon
    @Yahegaoon 15 days ago

    "Where's your armor? What if you get hit?"
    "Just don't get hit lol"