Thank you Mosfilm for uploading full movies on youtube you guys are truly incredible and doing a great service preserving these beautiful works of art, much love
This is history teaching at its finest. Do you know “The Tavistock Institute” job manipulation? Please deal with it, it still works today. Kind regards from southern Germany.🙋💐
This is a truly captivating and fair account of the campaign seen from the Russian side, thanks for the upload. Would go straight on with the next episode if it wasn't gone midnight! Will have to wait for the weekend.
Thank you. What a great hidden gem this is. I've never even heard of this and been really enjoying the great productions by foreign filmmakers. I think they did a great job with portraying Stalin and Hitler. Great 👍
Děkuji. Jaký je to skvělý skrytý klenot. Nikdy jsem o tom ani neslyšel a opravdu jsem si užíval skvělé produkce zahraničních filmařů. Myslím, že se ztvárněním Stalina a Hitlera odvedli skvělou práci. Skvělý
Vapor favor, subtítulos en español! Somos 500 millones de hispanos. Me encantan las películas rusas sobre la SGM. Saludos al noble y valiente pueblo ruso, desde Barcelona. España.
Try and learn English, it is the Lingua Franca of the world even though Spanish is the most beautiful of Romance languages and is spoken in 21 countries.
I didn't even know a film like this about Stalingrad existed. It is very well done and informative, from 1989 not one of these modern watered down versions.
I agree. Also, Hollywood movies so often focus on one individual or some small story (like a supposed personal combat between snipers) and neglect the far more interesting story of strategy and major decisions made by the generals and politicians.
Я родом из Куйбышева/ныне Самара/ Наш город в войну уцелел благодаря защитникам Сталинграда. Я в 70-х годах была в Волгограде. Там на Мамаевом Кургане, возле обелиска Родина- Мать мурашки по коже. Каждый сантиметр полит кровью солдат. Фрицам здесь врезали по полной. Они сходили с ума и подыхали от голода. Наши защитники стояли насмерть, поэтому потери огромны. Склоним головы перед павшими бойцами и никогда не забудем, что нашей жизнью мы обязаны всем, кто сложил головы на полях войны. Не забудем и детям завещаем. Вечная память героям!
К сожалению, из-за грубых ошибок командования немцы смогли так далеко зайти, аж до Волги, что продлило войну и стало причиной многих миллионов человеческих потерь, которые до сих пор больно бьют по России, её силе, экономике и благополучию
@@mrobocop1666 Отличный анализ, браво. К сожалению, все было именно так, в том числе из-за отсутствия надежных и быстрых средств связи, которые у нас есть сегодня. Подумайте, например, какой была бы история, если бы Сталин и Красная Армия уже тогда задействовали… беспилотники! Слава, Честь и Вечная Память всем героям, которые в итоге, несмотря ни на что, вышли ПОБЕДИТЕЛЕМ из того Ада!
@@mrobocop1666 What do you mean Numerical Superiority It was quality vs quantity You had so much much manpower and resources Furthermore who had support of 5 powerful allies (including:Nature (Winter)) Literally we were fighting on 3 fronts Japan was only Ally in papers Italy also turned sides Check 1v1 casualty ratio You will get to know It's was Quality vs Quantity Unfortunately Quantity won. Edit:I fear YT.
I am 73 and it amazes me I can highlight another language and then translate it into English. When I was a kid in the 50's this what what was called 'Buck Rogers' stuff. I wonder if the kids today who grow up with fantastic technology will ever know the feeling of seeing 'Buck Rogers' stuff?
German and Russian World War movies/series are by far the best. It is very weird watching a American or UK WW movie and everyone speaks in English. God bless true WW film makers!
How can you watch this with the Russian Narrator speaking every actors lines? I understand this is how Russians translate movies because of literacy but it completely ruined this what otherwise would be a very good film.
I enjoy all the movies made by Mosfilm and StarMedia. The writers and directors pull no punches. They tell a story that has no secrets. The proytrails of Stalin, Hitler and others are very factural and they look so much like them. I have watched many WWII shows but Russia has the best. Thank you for uploading these histroical movies and telling the story like it was.
Stalin and Hitler are lifelike, but the Churchill portrayal is ugly and dismal. When Stalin asks him where is the second front he could well have replied that area bombing of Germany is the second front, which kept a million Germans tied down on defence and away from the eastern front. Hitler's armaments minister Speer, who was in a position to know, admitted this after the war.
This portrayal of Stalin though is different from other movies. Usually he was portrayed as a nice guy or calm manager. On one instance as god-like figure. Here on the other hand Stalin though composed is edgy sometimes and constantly has predatory look in his eyes. It's very intentional. At 58.37 you have a scene were the last look at Stalin is seemingly needlessly added and he's totally focused on the other guys like a predator looking at his prey, while in other movies in such situation he would be either amused or said something sarcastic.
Ruben Ibarruri met the war on the Western Front and already in its first days managed to accomplish the feat. Covering the withdrawal of his regiment across the Berezina River in the Borisov area, Ibarruri and his machine gunners held off the onslaught of the enemy for about 6 hours. After the destruction of the last machine gun, the Spaniard with a handful of his unit rushed to attack the fascist tanks with grenades. During the attack, Ruben Ruiz was wounded and, subsequently, awarded the Order of the Red Banner. During the Battle of Stalingrad in August 1942, Ruben Ibarruri commanded a machine gun company in the 35th Guards Rifle Division. After the breakthrough of German tanks on August 23 in the area of the Vlasovka farm, Stalingrad was threatened with encirclement. The Soviet command understood that the main forces of the army were on the march and decided to send the Ibarruri machine gunners along with a rifle battalion to detain enemy troops. In a fierce battle with superior enemy forces, the Red Army soldiers held out for about a day, after the death of the battalion commander, Ruben Ibarruri took command. The next day, the Germans attempt to attack again, but the enemy troops were stopped by heavy machine gun fire. Ruben Ruiz raised the remnants of the battalion to attack, as a result of which the fascists were repulsed. During the attack, it was possible to capture enemy guns and mortars, but Ruben Ibarruri was seriously wounded by a mortar fragment in the chest. Unfortunately, it was not possible to save Ibarruri, he died in hospital on September 4, 1942. Initially, Ruben Ibarruri was buried in a mass grave in the village of Srednyaya Akhtuba, and later in 1948 he was reburied on the Alley of Heroes in Stalingrad (since 1961 Volgograd)
Some of the best war movies in the world by MOS films and Star Media. Excellent casting and educational value. I could watch these all day. I have learnt a great deal so thank you. As a European I cannot forget the huge sacrifice made by these soldiers to free us from an evil that is sadly showing up again.
27 million died in the Soviet Union during the 41-45 eastern front campaign, or the Great Patriotic war/op Barbarossa.. The Nazis really went crazy on the Russian front. I really hope history does not repeat itself, as the weapons' available now could be the end of mankind and civilisation as we know it. The people in charge of these arsenals of mass destruction are just mad enough to use them....and it is the normal people like us that will suffer while the mad men in charge sit in safe bunkers. We really are on the edge.
And remember: Yuri Ozerov was ahead of George Lucas, Peter Jackson, and David Yates. And he was ahead of them in that he was the first to film a prequel franchise to his original franchise. And yes, if, that his "Stalingrad" is the second prequel to "Liberation". The first was "The Battle of Moscow". And yes, he also had a spin-off to "Liberation" called "Soldiers of Freedom", which was before the prequels. And I don't know if that spin-off will be translated or not. But you should know about it.
Weird I never really gave lucas credit for the sequal system. I thought there were many films that had follow on stories? Was he really thought of as first?
@@hazed1009 Well, I don't know for sure. Because American films made before the 80s have been little studied by me. And that's why I haven't come across movie franchises that were the backstories of the main franchise before Lucas' Star Wars. I'm not talking about Ozerov. And that's why, for me, Lucas is the first person in American cinema who has done this. Yes, and besides, my comment was a joke.
Probably nothing unusual, given how many movies were made world-wide. Of big epic stories we have similar situation in Poland with 'the Trilogy'. The last, 'Sir Wołodyjowski' was filmed first', the second 'Deluge' is in the middle, and the first part 'With Fire and Sword' was filmed last. Thanks to this Daniel Olbychski could play both Asia son of Togay Bay, and his father Togay Bay.
@@piotrmalewski8178 , Oh, yes, I know about the trilogy about "Pan Wołodyjowski", and that it was filmed from the third to the first. From the trilogy, I watched "Fire and Sword" and "The Flood". I watched "Fire and Sword" as a child, and I don't remember my impressions. But I watched the movie "The Flood" ten years ago, and I liked it. I'll have to watch this trilogy in full.
@@Andrey_Gorbatok 'With Fire and Sword' is a good movie but it's not faithful to the book or history and by our military historians is considered an insult towards Polish military (the director has the hussars run into mud and get stuck, something that a veteran cavalryman would not do and historically never happened). Another issue is that there are two verions of the movie; the proper full 'TV version' and the butchered short cinema version. 'Sir Wołodyjowski' is interesting because it's most faithful to the book and the lead actor who never did sports, at the age of 40 trained so hard for a year he learnt to fight with swords, do dangerous horse stunts and stretched himself so much he could do high front kick up to head level and became his own stuntman for the movie. Actually eneded the movie with handful of injuries because of overtraining and accidents. 5 years later he returned to play in 'The Flood' and was almost killed on set when Olbrychski was a bit too quick for him in sword fight scene and almost crushed his head with a saber.
Такая реалъная масовка,с танками,живой силой и ефект баталнами сценами,,никто не сможет сейчас организоватъ. Респект сценаристу,режисера и всех,кто создали етот Шедевер.
Especially the Tiger tanks shown here in 1942, whereas in reality they first appeared in great numbers only at Kursk in summer 1943. Was that made to impress and make the "sacrifice" more into your face? There's a huge number of fuckups
@@dude9127 Absolutely. The Russian tanks that are seen to attack are the T34-85 that first appeared in 1944! There were the T-34-76 in the time described, and they were used in the Kursk battle, and that's why the Soviets decided to upgrade them to the 85 mm gun and turret since losses were appalling
@@dude9127Your problem is that you simply do not have the information. The T-34s were such good tanks that the Germans began to use them against the Russians, painting German Crosses on them!
Thank you Mosfilm , and those CCCP war classic. Did not know that Dolores Ibarury son was fighting on side of Red Army and sadly got killed in action 1942 , he was only 22 years old.
Estimados esta película es un verdadero documento histórico, es necesario que ustedes la subtitulen al castellano para el público con este idioma, no todos podemos leer el inglés. Gracias
By the way, it's funny that "Stalingrad" (2013) is essentially a "little party" of actors from previous films with the name "Stalingrad". You know that Thomas Kretschman starred in the German and Russian "Stalingrad". But you don't know about those actors from the Russian "Stalingrad" who starred in the Soviet "Stalingrad". Andrey Smolyakov, who played Leonid Khrushchev in Stalingrad (1989), played the old gunner Polyakov in Stalingrad (2013). And Fyodor Bondarchuk, who played sniper Ivan in Stalingrad (1989), was in Stalingrad (2013), was the director of this film and played Katya's son. By the way, an interesting fact: the character from Stalingrad (2013), played by Sergei Bondarchuk Jr., died in much the same way as the character of Fyodor Bondarchuk in Stalingrad (1989).
@@bruhism173 Well, I've seen almost all the feature films about Stalingrad except for four: 1) the American movie "The Boy from Stalingrad" (1943) 2) the Soviet movie "Days and Nights" (Дни и ночи, 1944) 3) The Soviet movie "Retribution" (Возмездие, 1967), which is a sequel to the excellent movie "The Living and the Dead" (Живые и мертвые, 1964). 4) The Russian movie "321st Siberian" (321-ая сибирская) made in the Republic of Buryatia. And this is a movie I won't watch until the second part comes out. The first part came out in 2022. All the other movies and one TV series, I watched. There are good ones, there are bad ones. And I can recommend the Soviet movie Soldiers (Солдаты, 1956). And if you haven't seen the West German "Dogs, do you want to live forever?" (Hunde, wollt ihr ewig leben?, 1959), I can recommend it too. And yes, I hope you watched "They Fought for the Motherland" (Они сражались за Родину, 1975) and Hot Snow (Горячий снег, 1972) on this channel. Because they are also among the movies about the Battle of Stalingrad. I even watched the film "Defense of Tsaritsyn" (Оборона Царицына, 1942), about the first of the four defenses of the Red Army against the White Army during the Russian Civil War. Tsaritsyn, the so-called Stalingrad until 1925. Three times the Reds successfully defended the city. On the fourth, the Whites captured him. But after a couple of months, the Reds beat him out of the hands of the Whites. The film "Defense of Tsaritsyn" (Оборона Царицына,1942) is good, but the film "Chapaev" (Чапаев, 1934) from the same directors is better. P.S. And yes, I am also a fan of the films of Sergei Bondarchuk Sr. and Fyodor Bondarchuk. I wanted to say that I am a fan of the creativity of the entire Bondarchuk family. But I haven't watched any of Natalia Bondarchuk's films. And Sergei Bondarchuk Jr. is still only an actor and producer. I like all the films of Sergei Bondarchuk Sr., except for the dilogy "Red Bells" and the TV series "Quiet Don" (2006). I like all of Fyodor Bondarchuk's films, except for his fantastic films. And I haven't watched his series. P.P.S. And yes, I watched all four of Yuri Ozerov's military film projects. And I like only "Liberation" and its "Stalingrad".
On technical side of things, what Stalin was not aware yet at this point, was how many technical difficulties T-34 had. There was hardly anything in the tank that worked properly, especially in 1942, and contrary to popular belief, one of the biggest issues was the engine that had insufficient stiffness for diesel compression rate, inefficient cooling system and was pushed to edge to deliver the required power output as well as suffering from ineffective air filter. The result was, T-34 tanks would suffer overheating after just 30 minutes of operation, blow head gaskets randomly and suffer from wear very quickly even when they didn't suffer head gasket failure.
I'm not usually one for subtitled movies but that was bloody brilliant I'm about to launch myself into part to awesome cant fault it my thanks from New Zealand 👌👌👌👌👌
It’s ironic that Stalin and the US generals were in agreement. They both argued against the British who wanted to wait before landing in France. One reason I think that Churchill was so cautious was because of the disastrous Gallipoli landings in WWI. The whole Gallipoli campaign was Churchill’s idea and gave him an excellent understanding of how costly such an amphibious attack could be.
@@pdbandit1 That was definitely an issue. I think there were others though. For example, the American troops were really green in 1941. Having them go up against the Italians and the Africa Corps and then later against the Italians and the Germans in Sicily helped the Americans gain much needed experience for the much harder battles starting with Normandy. Also, the US and UK developed some really innovative technology for amphibious landings. Landing craft, Hobart's "funnies", Mulberries, a cable across the channel to deliver fuel, etc. But I agree, Logistics was really the critical issue.
@@michaeldebellis4202 didn't the US consider Hobarts funnies to be ridiculous gimmicks? i vaguely remember some US general calling them "stuff and nonsense" even after their success on D-day
@@callumgriss5422 Yes, I think you are correct. IMO, the US Army was really closed minded because while some of Hobarts ideas didn't work out that well (e.g., lots of the floating Shermans never made it to the beach because of the current and their very limited ability to navigate in the water) there were also some great ideas like the flail tank and the Mulberries. I think the US Army was also short sighted in regards to the Firefly. The version of the Sherman with a gun that at least had a chance against German armor. My understanding is most British tank groups had 1 Firefly for every 5 tanks but I don't think the US adopted them, going for the tank destroyers which looked reasonable on paper but in real use just didn't have the armor (or even a covered turret) so couldn't stand up in combat against German armor.
23 августа 1942 г. пятеро моих родственников погибли в Сталинграде от рук немецких палачей. Трое из них были дети 2, 4 и 7 лет. Немцы утопили баржу с мирными гражданами при эвакуации на другой берег Волги. Этого я немцам никогда не прощу. Надеюсь мне повезет и я отомщу немцам за них.
А сколько русских вырезали народов когда создавали росс.империю? Идите нахуй, 27 миллионов погибло, что аж до сих пор в России баб больше чем мужиков. Хорошо они вас отлестали
I read the book Stalingrad. The Russians are tough and they will sacrifice ALL to win. Nobody should wage war against them unless you are prepared to lose all.
Boa noite, amigo. Experimente instalar as legendas, a função está aí, aqui comigo é a roda, abaixo à direita, é só programar, como fiz para o inglês, mas também tem o idioma português. Boa sorte!
@@angelocassanelli3401por gentileza tem como ver o filme com o som dos próprios atores? Legendas em inglês é ok agora essa tradução do que dizem os atores é ruim demais
@@PaulaContar Olá, Paula. Não, não é possível ouvir a voz original dos atores em... português. Tradução simultânea para outros idiomas, até mesmo para italiano para mim, é uma bagunça, não vale a pena fazer assim. Então se você sabe um pouco de inglês como eu, é melhor seguir as legendas em inglês que estão 99% bem traduzidas! Conselho? Assista parte do filme e traduza as palavras que você não conhece. Alguns dias depois, olhe novamente a mesma parte e você entenderá melhor. Esta noite, sexta-feira, 15 de março de 2024, estou assistindo pela terceira vez, justamente para entender aquelas palavras que não traduzi nas duas vezes anteriores. Desejo-lhe uma boa visualização.
Thank you, Mosfilm, for uploading beautiful feature films about World War II to RUclips! You are truly talented and you do a great service by preserving these beautiful works of art. I have seen that, in the meantime, you have provided many films with Spanish subtitles, thank you. But why don't you do the same by activating the Italian subtitles? There will surely be hundreds of thousands of elderly people like me, who will watch them with interest, pleasure and nostalgia. I hope you can fulfill this wish of mine. A big hug to all of you, Angelo Cassanelli. 😎 (Saturday, September 14, 2024)
Compared to the other Ozerov films, this one goes pretty hard on Stalin. Curious shift for sure. Still, I'm aware these films are not documentaries, films are films. Totally worthwhile watch whatever the case. Also Spanish subs please.
The film of the eighty-ninth year, in the Kremlin, counter-revolutionaries are preparing the collapse of the USSR in full, therefore such a black film.
It is made under Gorbachev. Sad times for us under the rule of clowns and traitors like Gorbachev. Even the movies were poisoned by the beginning madness of the Gorbachev years. The passage at the end of Part Two about Stalin, Khustchev and Zhukov is just digusting and also obviously withholding facts like completely ignoring how the Khustchev crew got into power. But the film makers were at no liberty to not put this in the movie.
Tremendous ! I had never heard or seen this movie and I thought I knew a bit about war films. The use of an international cast mirrors Bondarchuk`s better known "Waterloo".
These men were not just Heroes of the Soviet Union they were Heroes of the world so from Canada and many many years later I think your children and your grandchildren for your sacrifice from western Canada and God bless you all
Can you upload the uncut 1 hr and 45 min Lenin in October, 1937 film and the uncut 2 hr and 5 min Lenin in 1918, 1939 film with English subtitles please?
Stalingrad (1989/1990) by Yuri Ozerov. Produced in the waning days of the Soviet Union and under the auspices of Gorvachev’s Perestroika period, the film was a co-production between the US and the USSR, involving Quincy Jones out of all people, with Powers Boothe!
Have now seen all three Russian/Soviet films about the actual battle for Stalingrad. It is interesting to compare them all as each have their good and bad points but all make for good entertainment assuming you like war movies.
3Kuula Apostli soov eestpalveks 1 Viimaks veel, vennad, palvetage meie eest, et Issanda sõna leviks ja kirgastuks nõnda nagu teiegi juures 2 ning et meid kistaks välja üleannetute ja kurjade inimeste käest. Sest usku ei ole kõikidel. 3 Aga ustav on Issand, kes teid kinnitab ja kurja eest hoiab. 4 Me oleme ju Issandas veendunud teie suhtes, et te olete teinud ja teete, mida me käsime. 5 Issand aga suunaku teie südamed Jumala armastuse ja Kristuse kannatlikkuse poole! Käsk töötamiseks 6 Aga meie käsime teid, vennad, meie Issanda Jeesuse Kristuse nimel vältida kõiki vendi, kes logelevad ja ei ela mitte pärimuse järgi, mille nad on meilt saanud. 7 Te teate ju ise, kuidas te peate meid võtma eeskujuks, sest meie ei ole teie keskel logelnud 8 ega ole kellegi juures leiba muidu söönud, vaid oleme vaeva nähes ja rühmates töötanud nii ööd kui päevad, et me ei koormaks kedagi teie seast. 9 Mitte et meil poleks seda meelevalda, vaid me tahaksime anda teile head eeskuju. 10 Sest ka siis, kui olime teie juures, käskisime teid: „Kes ei taha töötada, ärgu ka söögu!” 11 Me kuuleme ju, et mõned teie keskel elavad korratult ja ei tööta, vaid janditavad. 12 Niisuguseid me käsime ja manitseme Issandas Jeesuses Kristuses, et nad vaikselt töötades sööksid oma leiba. 13 Teie aga, vennad, ärge tüdige head tehes! 14 Aga kui mõni ei kuula, mida me oleme ütelnud selles kirjas, siis pange teda tähele ja ärge suhelge temaga, et ta hakkaks häbenema. 15 Kuid ärge pidage teda vaenlaseks, vaid noomige teda kui venda. Lõputervitus 16 Aga rahu Issand ise andku teile rahu alati ja igal viisil. Issand olgu teie kõikidega! 17 See tervitus on minu, Pauluse käega. See on tähiseks igas kirjas - nii kirjutan mina! 18 Meie Issanda Jeesuse Kristuse arm olgu teie kõikidega!
It's a great film, the film of my childhood! Due to the shortage of German tanks, the film crew had to makeup Soviet tanks (for example, T-55), all the special effects and explosions were real (using pyrotechnics), one of the main roles of the commander of the 62nd Army of the Red Army Chuikov was even played by Hollywood star - Powers Boothe. Of course, the film contains historical inconsistencies and liberal views of the 80s (for example, the gullible Stalin, or Khrushchev's son, in real his leg a year before Stalingrad, or the "bloody" actions of the NKVD, which in the film, for some reason, only shoot everyone, although in fact they served to strengthen infantry formations and block the path of German troops in those sectors of the front where the Germans broke through the defenses), but otherwise it is an excellent film, it is much better than Bondarchuk's modern film about Stalingrad. By the way, Bondarchuk also starred in this film - the NKVD commissar wanted to shoot him (it is possible that the commissar was from the future and saw what disgusting films Bondarchuk would mak, lol).
There are a lot more running /85’s left around than /75’s so the film makers used what they could get. Older versions of all military equipment got chewed up or retired and scrapped up very fast in an all out war. There are many more P-51 fighter planes still flying than P-40’s.
Great to see an account from the Russian perspective. The casting was spot-on. All the major figures very closely resembled their historical counterpart. Particularly, Stalin and Khrushchev. Am assuming that Stalin's speech patterns were closely emulated by the actor. Stalin moves robot-like in this film. Was that his actual body language?
Yes, Stalin walked with difficulty and his hand moved poorly. The reason is that in his youth, he was a secret terrorist for the Communist Party and received just as much damage in the Russian Civil War (1918-1922). According to the memoirs of contemporaries, Stalin had the will and magnetism of an alien predator, and few could withstand his gaze. So the actor portrayed Stalin correctly.
damn, i've been waiting to see this movie subtitled for a long time. I finally got a bootleg with a really bad google translated subtitle a few days before it was uploaded on this channel. Talk about bad timing. I'm gonna have to watch it again with a proper subtitle now
Is the scene with Churchill in Moscow historically accurate? I don’t recall such a meeting and it seems unlikely Churchill would take the incredible risk getting from London to Moscow at that point in the war.
It took place on August 12-17, 1942. The event is called the Second Moscow Conference. Churchill was really present in it. But as far as it is historically reliably filmed, I do not know for sure.
Thomas Kretschmann was in the 1993 German film AND in the 2013 version directed by Fedor Bondarchuk, son of Sergei who directed the epic 1966 War and Peace.
It's interesting to see a Russian film from 1989, especially when things were kinda tense then, regretfully as today. Maybe one day the Russian people will find themselves a chance to elect their leaders instead of ones "appointed" for life. Democracy is not perfect, but it does allow for better economic opportunities for the people most of the time. But like anything, it can only be as good as the people in power. Thanks for the movie.
As far as straight up physical appearance this movie has one of closest Hitler lookalikes I have ever seen. Stalin’s casting is also really spot on as far as the look goes.
They made Stalin 20% more dashing and skinny for the movie, which, yeah. The hair and mustache are dead on. I think the actor from the 1949 version imitates his soft-spoken demeanor better. It's interesting comparing the different ideological lenses that made him a kind father figure in one movie and a mildly incompetent sourpuss in the other. I think this is one of the more dignified portrayals of Hitler I've seen, which makes me wonder if we don't tend to lean into the manic nincompoop depiction a little too much. But again they nailed the look, although I think he might be a tad old?
Who is the actor that plays "chuikov"? Ive seen him in other films , im sure of it, but cant place where!!? Was he in a spagetti western? Or james bond? Its driving me crazy lol [Edit] oh my god its powers boothe!!!! Lol hes been in hundreds of movies!! He played the leader of the red sash gang in tombstone!!!! The bad guy in Sin city!! How did i miss that 🙄, he was speaking Russian maybe? Threw me off lol, thats my excuse anyhow!! Hehe doh feel little foolish now 😂
4K Full HD? I’m puzzled - I’ve been watching the 1960s Russian - War and Peace (the greatest epic ever made) and that really does look like the best ever HD but this looks more like basic DVD quality?
In the first battle scene , taking place in Temoshenkos offensive in 1942' all the tanks were T34 85 s problem was they didn't exist for another couple of y3ars , where are the T34 76 s , but let's give credit , when you compare some contemporary American garbage like The Battle of the Bulge and assorted garbage , they are using Patton tanks or worse to portray WW2 tanks , so this Russian offering is far superior , but even going back to the Battleship Potemkin they always were , more historically accurate more realistic than any Hollywood rubbish regardless of the year.
Thank you Mosfilm for uploading full movies on youtube you guys are truly incredible and doing a great service preserving these beautiful works of art, much love
This is history teaching at its finest. Do you know “The Tavistock Institute” job manipulation? Please deal with it, it still works today. Kind regards from southern Germany.🙋💐
This is a truly captivating and fair account of the campaign seen from the Russian side, thanks for the upload. Would go straight on with the next episode if it wasn't gone midnight! Will have to wait for the weekend.
Thank you. What a great hidden gem this is. I've never even heard of this and been really enjoying the great productions by foreign filmmakers. I think they did a great job with portraying Stalin and Hitler.
Great 👍
Děkuji. Jaký je to skvělý skrytý klenot. Nikdy jsem o tom ani neslyšel a opravdu jsem si užíval skvělé produkce zahraničních filmařů. Myslím, že se ztvárněním Stalina a Hitlera odvedli skvělou práci.
Skvělý
Vapor favor, subtítulos en español!
Somos 500 millones de hispanos.
Me encantan las películas rusas sobre la SGM.
Saludos al noble y valiente pueblo ruso, desde Barcelona. España.
Todas las películas de Mosfilm se pueden descargar gratis pero el problema siempre son los subtitulos.
Gracias Taxman @@mrtaxman4942
Try and learn English, it is the Lingua Franca of the world even though Spanish is the most beautiful of Romance languages and is spoken in 21 countries.
Prefiero los subtítulos en todas las peliculas: noruegas, coreanas, indias, etc.@@alfonsorodriguez799
así es pero no solo subtítulos un doblaje en al idioma hispanohablante por cierto como se llama la película de que año es
I didn't even know a film like this about Stalingrad existed. It is very well done and informative, from 1989 not one of these modern watered down versions.
I agree. Also, Hollywood movies so often focus on one individual or some small story (like a supposed personal combat between snipers) and neglect the far more interesting story of strategy and major decisions made by the generals and politicians.
there were two other very good movies on Stalingrad. one was German.
@@rustykilt Do you by any chance remember the names? I'm always looking for good war movies and I don't mind sub-titles
Yes, search Stalingrad 1993 for the German version. Great movie! @@rustykilt
Search Stalingrad 1993. It's a really good German film. @@michaeldebellis4202
Я родом из Куйбышева/ныне Самара/ Наш город в войну уцелел благодаря
защитникам Сталинграда. Я в 70-х годах была в Волгограде. Там на Мамаевом
Кургане, возле обелиска Родина- Мать мурашки по коже. Каждый сантиметр
полит кровью солдат. Фрицам здесь врезали по полной. Они сходили с ума и
подыхали от голода. Наши защитники стояли насмерть, поэтому потери огромны.
Склоним головы перед павшими бойцами и никогда не забудем, что нашей
жизнью мы обязаны всем, кто сложил головы на полях войны. Не забудем и
детям завещаем. Вечная память героям!
Forget nothing. Forget no one
К сожалению, из-за грубых ошибок командования немцы смогли так далеко зайти, аж до Волги, что продлило войну и стало причиной многих миллионов человеческих потерь, которые до сих пор больно бьют по России, её силе, экономике и благополучию
@@mrobocop1666 Отличный анализ, браво. К сожалению, все было именно так, в том числе из-за отсутствия надежных и быстрых средств связи, которые у нас есть сегодня. Подумайте, например, какой была бы история, если бы Сталин и Красная Армия уже тогда задействовали… беспилотники! Слава, Честь и Вечная Память всем героям, которые в итоге, несмотря ни на что, вышли ПОБЕДИТЕЛЕМ из того Ада!
@@mrobocop1666 What do you mean Numerical Superiority
It was quality vs quantity
You had so much much manpower and resources
Furthermore who had support of 5 powerful allies (including:Nature (Winter))
Literally we were fighting on 3 fronts
Japan was only Ally in papers
Italy also turned sides
Check 1v1 casualty ratio
You will get to know
It's was Quality vs Quantity
Unfortunately Quantity won.
Edit:I fear YT.
I am 73 and it amazes me I can highlight another language and then translate it into English. When I was a kid in the 50's this what what was called 'Buck Rogers' stuff. I wonder if the kids today who grow up with fantastic technology will ever know the feeling of seeing 'Buck Rogers' stuff?
Cheers Mosfilm, I'm still enjoying the channel here in the UK in 2023!
And me Dec 27th 2024. Uk as well. Mosfilm shows great movies.
German and Russian World War movies/series are by far the best. It is very weird watching a American or UK WW movie and everyone speaks in English. God bless true WW film makers!
I like Civil War movies where the north kicks southern ass to end slavery.
@@joealberti7762 lol🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@joealberti7762meanwhile Medieval war movie battle is always mess
@@joealberti7762 well it wasn't about slavery stupid. It was about state rights.
How can you watch this with the Russian Narrator speaking every actors lines? I understand this is how Russians translate movies because of literacy but it completely ruined this what otherwise would be a very good film.
I enjoy all the movies made by Mosfilm and StarMedia. The writers and directors pull no punches. They tell a story that has no secrets. The proytrails of Stalin, Hitler and others are very factural and they look so much like them. I have watched many WWII shows but Russia has the best. Thank you for uploading these histroical movies and telling the story like it was.
Stalin and Hitler are lifelike, but the Churchill portrayal is ugly and dismal. When Stalin asks him where is the second front he could well have replied that area bombing of Germany is the second front, which kept a million Germans tied down on defence and away from the eastern front. Hitler's armaments minister Speer, who was in a position to know, admitted this after the war.
Спасибо тебе, друг!! Ты очень правильно понял суть фильма!!!. Тебе за это спасибо огромное!!!!
This portrayal of Stalin though is different from other movies. Usually he was portrayed as a nice guy or calm manager. On one instance as god-like figure. Here on the other hand Stalin though composed is edgy sometimes and constantly has predatory look in his eyes. It's very intentional. At 58.37 you have a scene were the last look at Stalin is seemingly needlessly added and he's totally focused on the other guys like a predator looking at his prey, while in other movies in such situation he would be either amused or said something sarcastic.
@@piotrmalewski8178 that’s a very realistic portrayal. Stalin was not a good guy.
They intentionally made Hitler puny. He was 175 cm tall. Stalin was portrayed as tall, in reality 165 cm. Be historically accurate.
Ruben Ibarruri met the war on the Western Front and already in its first days managed to accomplish the feat. Covering the withdrawal of his regiment across the Berezina River in the Borisov area, Ibarruri and his machine gunners held off the onslaught of the enemy for about 6 hours. After the destruction of the last machine gun, the Spaniard with a handful of his unit rushed to attack the fascist tanks with grenades. During the attack, Ruben Ruiz was wounded and, subsequently, awarded the Order of the Red Banner.
During the Battle of Stalingrad in August 1942, Ruben Ibarruri commanded a machine gun company in the 35th Guards Rifle Division. After the breakthrough of German tanks on August 23 in the area of the Vlasovka farm, Stalingrad was threatened with encirclement. The Soviet command understood that the main forces of the army were on the march and decided to send the Ibarruri machine gunners along with a rifle battalion to detain enemy troops. In a fierce battle with superior enemy forces, the Red Army soldiers held out for about a day, after the death of the battalion commander, Ruben Ibarruri took command. The next day, the Germans attempt to attack again, but the enemy troops were stopped by heavy machine gun fire. Ruben Ruiz raised the remnants of the battalion to attack, as a result of which the fascists were repulsed. During the attack, it was possible to capture enemy guns and mortars, but Ruben Ibarruri was seriously wounded by a mortar fragment in the chest. Unfortunately, it was not possible to save Ibarruri, he died in hospital on September 4, 1942.
Initially, Ruben Ibarruri was buried in a mass grave in the village of Srednyaya Akhtuba, and later in 1948 he was reburied on the Alley of Heroes in Stalingrad (since 1961 Volgograd)
Thanks for history lesson
Some of the best war movies in the world by MOS films and Star Media. Excellent casting and educational value. I could watch these all day. I have learnt a great deal so thank you. As a European I cannot forget the huge sacrifice made by these soldiers to free us from an evil that is sadly showing up again.
27 million died in the Soviet Union during the 41-45 eastern front campaign, or the Great Patriotic war/op Barbarossa.. The Nazis really went crazy on the Russian front. I really hope history does not repeat itself, as the weapons' available now could be the end of mankind and civilisation as we know it. The people in charge of these arsenals of mass destruction are just mad enough to use them....and it is the normal people like us that will suffer while the mad men in charge sit in safe bunkers. We really are on the edge.
You do realize that Stalin enslaved half of Europe and killed countess millions of people?
да братан похоже ты прав
Please do you if there is a diffrent version of this movie with original sound of the actors?
And remember: Yuri Ozerov was ahead of George Lucas, Peter Jackson, and David Yates. And he was ahead of them in that he was the first to film a prequel franchise to his original franchise. And yes, if, that his "Stalingrad" is the second prequel to "Liberation". The first was "The Battle of Moscow". And yes, he also had a spin-off to "Liberation" called "Soldiers of Freedom", which was before the prequels. And I don't know if that spin-off will be translated or not. But you should know about it.
Weird I never really gave lucas credit for the sequal system. I thought there were many films that had follow on stories? Was he really thought of as first?
@@hazed1009 Well, I don't know for sure. Because American films made before the 80s have been little studied by me. And that's why I haven't come across movie franchises that were the backstories of the main franchise before Lucas' Star Wars. I'm not talking about Ozerov. And that's why, for me, Lucas is the first person in American cinema who has done this.
Yes, and besides, my comment was a joke.
Probably nothing unusual, given how many movies were made world-wide. Of big epic stories we have similar situation in Poland with 'the Trilogy'. The last, 'Sir Wołodyjowski' was filmed first', the second 'Deluge' is in the middle, and the first part 'With Fire and Sword' was filmed last. Thanks to this Daniel Olbychski could play both Asia son of Togay Bay, and his father Togay Bay.
@@piotrmalewski8178 , Oh, yes, I know about the trilogy about "Pan Wołodyjowski", and that it was filmed from the third to the first. From the trilogy, I watched "Fire and Sword" and "The Flood". I watched "Fire and Sword" as a child, and I don't remember my impressions. But I watched the movie "The Flood" ten years ago, and I liked it. I'll have to watch this trilogy in full.
@@Andrey_Gorbatok 'With Fire and Sword' is a good movie but it's not faithful to the book or history and by our military historians is considered an insult towards Polish military (the director has the hussars run into mud and get stuck, something that a veteran cavalryman would not do and historically never happened). Another issue is that there are two verions of the movie; the proper full 'TV version' and the butchered short cinema version.
'Sir Wołodyjowski' is interesting because it's most faithful to the book and the lead actor who never did sports, at the age of 40 trained so hard for a year he learnt to fight with swords, do dangerous horse stunts and stretched himself so much he could do high front kick up to head level and became his own stuntman for the movie. Actually eneded the movie with handful of injuries because of overtraining and accidents. 5 years later he returned to play in 'The Flood' and was almost killed on set when Olbrychski was a bit too quick for him in sword fight scene and almost crushed his head with a saber.
Thanks Mosfilm. I can watch old film with history on it
Такая реалъная масовка,с танками,живой силой и ефект баталнами сценами,,никто не сможет сейчас организоватъ. Респект сценаристу,режисера и всех,кто создали етот Шедевер.
Historically, this film is excellent. Production values are excellent as well. More people should watch this.
Especially the Tiger tanks shown here in 1942, whereas in reality they first appeared in great numbers only at Kursk in summer 1943. Was that made to impress and make the "sacrifice" more into your face? There's a huge number of fuckups
@@nallyvaico therre are more issues with tanks. in one scene you see t-34 tanks in german assault units..
@@dude9127 Absolutely. The Russian tanks that are seen to attack are the T34-85 that first appeared in 1944! There were the T-34-76 in the time described, and they were used in the Kursk battle, and that's why the Soviets decided to upgrade them to the 85 mm gun and turret since losses were appalling
@@dude9127Your problem is that you simply do not have the information. The T-34s were such good tanks that the Germans began to use them against the Russians, painting German Crosses on them!
@@eugen2408 good point tho
Thank you Mosfilm , and those CCCP war classic. Did not know that Dolores Ibarury son was fighting on side of Red Army and sadly got killed in action 1942 , he was only 22 years old.
Сильное Русское кино ....
Великий СССР....
Могучие советские войны....
Estimados esta película es un verdadero documento histórico, es necesario que ustedes la subtitulen al castellano para el público con este idioma, no todos podemos leer el inglés.
Gracias
You can to attach by yourself .In right corner you can see kinde of ring ,to touch automaticily and choose Spain. Good luck
@@piotr5338cesky
@@piotr5338solo hay subtitulos en inglés.
De'ciles en Ruso !! 😬
Second-ish and only 5 minutes late, I feel like this is a big film.
This is the best stalingrad film... Better than the 2013 one and the German ones.. They are good but nothing beats Yuri Ozerov's war films..
He’s the best!
By the way, it's funny that "Stalingrad" (2013) is essentially a "little party" of actors from previous films with the name "Stalingrad". You know that Thomas Kretschman starred in the German and Russian "Stalingrad". But you don't know about those actors from the Russian "Stalingrad" who starred in the Soviet "Stalingrad". Andrey Smolyakov, who played Leonid Khrushchev in Stalingrad (1989), played the old gunner Polyakov in Stalingrad (2013). And Fyodor Bondarchuk, who played sniper Ivan in Stalingrad (1989), was in Stalingrad (2013), was the director of this film and played Katya's son.
By the way, an interesting fact: the character from Stalingrad (2013), played by Sergei Bondarchuk Jr., died in much the same way as the character of Fyodor Bondarchuk in Stalingrad (1989).
Resemblances for Hitler and Stain are incredible… not Churchill. Loving this movie
@@Andrey_Gorbatokand I thought I was the autistic savant about stalingrad, dear god I got more to learn.
@@bruhism173 Well, I've seen almost all the feature films about Stalingrad except for four:
1) the American movie "The Boy from Stalingrad" (1943)
2) the Soviet movie "Days and Nights" (Дни и ночи, 1944)
3) The Soviet movie "Retribution" (Возмездие, 1967), which is a sequel to the excellent movie "The Living and the Dead" (Живые и мертвые, 1964).
4) The Russian movie "321st Siberian" (321-ая сибирская) made in the Republic of Buryatia. And this is a movie I won't watch until the second part comes out. The first part came out in 2022.
All the other movies and one TV series, I watched. There are good ones, there are bad ones. And I can recommend the Soviet movie Soldiers (Солдаты, 1956). And if you haven't seen the West German "Dogs, do you want to live forever?" (Hunde, wollt ihr ewig leben?, 1959), I can recommend it too. And yes, I hope you watched "They Fought for the Motherland" (Они сражались за Родину, 1975) and Hot Snow (Горячий снег, 1972) on this channel. Because they are also among the movies about the Battle of Stalingrad.
I even watched the film "Defense of Tsaritsyn" (Оборона Царицына, 1942), about the first of the four defenses of the Red Army against the White Army during the Russian Civil War. Tsaritsyn, the so-called Stalingrad until 1925. Three times the Reds successfully defended the city. On the fourth, the Whites captured him. But after a couple of months, the Reds beat him out of the hands of the Whites. The film "Defense of Tsaritsyn" (Оборона Царицына,1942) is good, but the film "Chapaev" (Чапаев, 1934) from the same directors is better.
P.S. And yes, I am also a fan of the films of Sergei Bondarchuk Sr. and Fyodor Bondarchuk. I wanted to say that I am a fan of the creativity of the entire Bondarchuk family. But I haven't watched any of Natalia Bondarchuk's films. And Sergei Bondarchuk Jr. is still only an actor and producer. I like all the films of Sergei Bondarchuk Sr., except for the dilogy "Red Bells" and the TV series "Quiet Don" (2006). I like all of Fyodor Bondarchuk's films, except for his fantastic films. And I haven't watched his series.
P.P.S. And yes, I watched all four of Yuri Ozerov's military film projects. And I like only "Liberation" and its "Stalingrad".
Thanks mosfilm. Watching now!
On technical side of things, what Stalin was not aware yet at this point, was how many technical difficulties T-34 had. There was hardly anything in the tank that worked properly, especially in 1942, and contrary to popular belief, one of the biggest issues was the engine that had insufficient stiffness for diesel compression rate, inefficient cooling system and was pushed to edge to deliver the required power output as well as suffering from ineffective air filter. The result was, T-34 tanks would suffer overheating after just 30 minutes of operation, blow head gaskets randomly and suffer from wear very quickly even when they didn't suffer head gasket failure.
I'm not usually one for subtitled movies but that was bloody brilliant I'm about to launch myself into part to awesome cant fault it my thanks from New Zealand 👌👌👌👌👌
So weird seeing Powers Booth, but hey, I’m not complaining 😍
Thank you very much!
It’s ironic that Stalin and the US generals were in agreement. They both argued against the British who wanted to wait before landing in France. One reason I think that Churchill was so cautious was because of the disastrous Gallipoli landings in WWI. The whole Gallipoli campaign was Churchill’s idea and gave him an excellent understanding of how costly such an amphibious attack could be.
Logistics, we didn't get a handle on the u boat issues until May - June of 1943? It took a year to get enough troops and equipment across to England.
@@pdbandit1 That was definitely an issue. I think there were others though. For example, the American troops were really green in 1941. Having them go up against the Italians and the Africa Corps and then later against the Italians and the Germans in Sicily helped the Americans gain much needed experience for the much harder battles starting with Normandy. Also, the US and UK developed some really innovative technology for amphibious landings. Landing craft, Hobart's "funnies", Mulberries, a cable across the channel to deliver fuel, etc. But I agree, Logistics was really the critical issue.
was Churchill not pushing for an invasion from the Med?
@@michaeldebellis4202 didn't the US consider Hobarts funnies to be ridiculous gimmicks? i vaguely remember some US general calling them "stuff and nonsense" even after their success on D-day
@@callumgriss5422 Yes, I think you are correct. IMO, the US Army was really closed minded because while some of Hobarts ideas didn't work out that well (e.g., lots of the floating Shermans never made it to the beach because of the current and their very limited ability to navigate in the water) there were also some great ideas like the flail tank and the Mulberries. I think the US Army was also short sighted in regards to the Firefly. The version of the Sherman with a gun that at least had a chance against German armor. My understanding is most British tank groups had 1 Firefly for every 5 tanks but I don't think the US adopted them, going for the tank destroyers which looked reasonable on paper but in real use just didn't have the armor (or even a covered turret) so couldn't stand up in combat against German armor.
23 августа 1942 г. пятеро моих родственников погибли в Сталинграде от рук немецких палачей. Трое из них были дети 2, 4 и 7 лет. Немцы утопили баржу с мирными гражданами при эвакуации на другой берег Волги. Этого я немцам никогда не прощу. Надеюсь мне повезет и я отомщу немцам за них.
@user-no9yr4ho5w, каким ты немцам собрался мстить? Их уже нет в живых.
The Soviets had also persecuted millions of ethnic Germans from Mennonite community in USSR.
@@БорисЛяпкин-й7э ещё монголам и татарам отомсти. Нацист сейчас ты, а не они
Сожалею о вашей боли, немцы были очень жестоки к русскому народу, привет из Бразилии
А сколько русских вырезали народов когда создавали росс.империю? Идите нахуй, 27 миллионов погибло, что аж до сих пор в России баб больше чем мужиков. Хорошо они вас отлестали
Epic film, great production! Thanks!
Fernando Allende is one of the best mexican-puertorican actors. Thanks to MOSFILM for this amazing movie.
Puertorican?? 🤦♀️ he’s Mexican.
He was born in México.
Thank you for this film.
I read the book Stalingrad.
The Russians are tough and they will sacrifice ALL to win.
Nobody should wage war against them unless you are prepared to lose all.
You forget the contribution made by Ukrainians in the Red Army. Some of the best soldiers and Generals were Ukrainian.
@@redrev674 Не насилуйте голову! 🤣 Этимология слова "украинцы" - у края России, окраина, Малоросы
A comunidade de língua portuguesa, com mais de 250.000.000 de falantes, merece que a Mosfilm disponibilize legendas em português. Por gentileza.
ssopa du makako?
Boa noite, amigo. Experimente instalar as legendas, a função está aí, aqui comigo é a roda, abaixo à direita, é só programar, como fiz para o inglês, mas também tem o idioma português. Boa sorte!
@@angelocassanelli3401 , segui sua recomendação e deu certo. Muito obrigada.
@@angelocassanelli3401por gentileza tem como ver o filme com o som dos próprios atores? Legendas em inglês é ok agora essa tradução do que dizem os atores é ruim demais
@@PaulaContar Olá, Paula. Não, não é possível ouvir a voz original dos atores em... português. Tradução simultânea para outros idiomas, até mesmo para italiano para mim, é uma bagunça, não vale a pena fazer assim. Então se você sabe um pouco de inglês como eu, é melhor seguir as legendas em inglês que estão 99% bem traduzidas! Conselho? Assista parte do filme e traduza as palavras que você não conhece. Alguns dias depois, olhe novamente a mesma parte e você entenderá melhor. Esta noite, sexta-feira, 15 de março de 2024, estou assistindo pela terceira vez, justamente para entender aquelas palavras que não traduzi nas duas vezes anteriores. Desejo-lhe uma boa visualização.
😅thank you for this historical film,very close to the real story and events thank you
Thank you, Mosfilm, for uploading beautiful feature films about World War II to RUclips! You are truly talented and you do a great service by preserving these beautiful works of art. I have seen that, in the meantime, you have provided many films with Spanish subtitles, thank you. But why don't you do the same by activating the Italian subtitles? There will surely be hundreds of thousands of elderly people like me, who will watch them with interest, pleasure and nostalgia. I hope you can fulfill this wish of mine. A big hug to all of you, Angelo Cassanelli. 😎 (Saturday, September 14, 2024)
Jestem 😮tylko😮widzem😮tak😮jak😮wy😮nie😮moge😮spelnic😮waszej😮prozby😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮
my fave of the many Stalingrad films eternal gratitude to the men and women of the red army never forget never repeat
WORKERS OF THE WORLD UNITE
Пролетарии всех стран соединяйтесь! WORKERS OF THE WORLD UNITE !
Compared to the other Ozerov films, this one goes pretty hard on Stalin. Curious shift for sure.
Still, I'm aware these films are not documentaries, films are films. Totally worthwhile watch whatever the case.
Also Spanish subs please.
The film of the eighty-ninth year, in the Kremlin, counter-revolutionaries are preparing the collapse of the USSR in full, therefore such a black film.
@@vadimanreev4585 just realized it's from 1989. That sure has to do with it.
It is made under Gorbachev. Sad times for us under the rule of clowns and traitors like Gorbachev. Even the movies were poisoned by the beginning madness of the Gorbachev years. The passage at the end of Part Two about Stalin, Khustchev and Zhukov is just digusting and also obviously withholding facts like completely ignoring how the Khustchev crew got into power. But the film makers were at no liberty to not put this in the movie.
Thank you! Heard about this movie long time ago and could never find it.
Great film, thanks for posting
thank you for uploading
At 1:24:54 is that Powers Boothe, playing Chuikov??? I think it is!
Yep, I was right. Just did a search, and in his bio, he is credited in this movie. Amazing!
@@sdcgnojhmr8755 He is credited in the beginning of the film @ 0:27
Warner Bros helped finance the picture. They demanded an American actor in the film.
German dialog dubbed in russian with english subtitles - this film has it all.
And French dialogue dub to Russian
I see your tactics havent changed in 80 years
Amazed that Powers Booth is in this.
The actor playing Ruben Ibarruri is Mexican actor Fernando Allende who was a popular telenovela actor and also starred in some American movies.
Tremendous ! I had never heard or seen this movie and I thought I knew a bit about war films. The use of an international cast mirrors Bondarchuk`s better known "Waterloo".
MOLODETC !! Mann !! So REALISTIC !! 😵💥🪖💀
Certainly a historical document. Thanks for uploading.
These men were not just Heroes of the Soviet Union they were Heroes of the world so from Canada and many many years later I think your children and your grandchildren for your sacrifice from western Canada and God bless you all
Can you upload the uncut 1 hr and 45 min Lenin in October, 1937 film and the uncut 2 hr and 5 min Lenin in 1918, 1939 film with English subtitles please?
Ditto!
Stalingrad (1989/1990) by Yuri Ozerov. Produced in the waning days of the Soviet Union and under the auspices of Gorvachev’s Perestroika period, the film was a co-production between the US and the USSR, involving Quincy Jones out of all people, with Powers Boothe!
No wonder it sucks.... love Quincy Jones though
EXCELENTE PELÍCULA
Spanish please que acá igual amamos su cine
Have now seen all three Russian/Soviet films about the actual battle for Stalingrad. It is interesting to compare them all as each have their good and bad points but all make for good entertainment assuming you like war movies.
Good movie, some really great scenes to ponder. 1:06:03. bravo! :) The late Powers Booth is at 1:26:10, a great American actor.
3Kuula
Apostli soov eestpalveks
1 Viimaks veel, vennad, palvetage meie eest, et Issanda sõna leviks
ja kirgastuks nõnda nagu teiegi juures
2 ning et meid kistaks välja üleannetute ja kurjade inimeste käest.
Sest usku ei ole kõikidel.
3 Aga ustav on Issand, kes teid kinnitab ja kurja eest hoiab.
4 Me oleme ju Issandas veendunud teie suhtes, et te olete teinud ja
teete, mida me käsime.
5 Issand aga suunaku teie südamed Jumala armastuse ja Kristuse
kannatlikkuse poole!
Käsk töötamiseks
6 Aga meie käsime teid, vennad, meie Issanda Jeesuse Kristuse nimel
vältida kõiki vendi, kes logelevad ja ei ela mitte pärimuse järgi,
mille nad on meilt saanud.
7 Te teate ju ise, kuidas te peate meid võtma eeskujuks, sest meie
ei ole teie keskel logelnud
8 ega ole kellegi juures leiba muidu söönud, vaid oleme vaeva nähes ja
rühmates töötanud nii ööd kui päevad, et me ei koormaks kedagi teie seast.
9 Mitte et meil poleks seda meelevalda, vaid me tahaksime
anda teile head eeskuju.
10 Sest ka siis, kui olime teie juures, käskisime teid:
„Kes ei taha töötada, ärgu ka söögu!”
11 Me kuuleme ju, et mõned teie keskel elavad korratult ja ei tööta,
vaid janditavad.
12 Niisuguseid me käsime ja manitseme Issandas Jeesuses Kristuses, et
nad vaikselt töötades sööksid oma leiba.
13 Teie aga, vennad, ärge tüdige head tehes!
14 Aga kui mõni ei kuula, mida me oleme ütelnud selles kirjas, siis pange
teda tähele ja ärge suhelge temaga, et ta hakkaks häbenema.
15 Kuid ärge pidage teda vaenlaseks, vaid noomige teda kui venda.
Lõputervitus
16 Aga rahu Issand ise andku teile rahu alati ja igal viisil.
Issand olgu teie kõikidega!
17 See tervitus on minu, Pauluse käega. See on tähiseks igas kirjas
- nii kirjutan mina!
18 Meie Issanda Jeesuse Kristuse arm olgu teie kõikidega!
Amen 🙏✝️☦🙏
Its good to watch this picture and German perspective Stalingrad movie from 1993
One of the greatest (or maybe the best) historical war movie ever. Too bad Russian don't make movie like this anymore.
It's a great film, the film of my childhood! Due to the shortage of German tanks, the film crew had to makeup Soviet tanks (for example, T-55), all the special effects and explosions were real (using pyrotechnics), one of the main roles of the commander of the 62nd Army of the Red Army Chuikov was even played by Hollywood star - Powers Boothe. Of course, the film contains historical inconsistencies and liberal views of the 80s (for example, the gullible Stalin, or Khrushchev's son, in real his leg a year before Stalingrad, or the "bloody" actions of the NKVD, which in the film, for some reason, only shoot everyone, although in fact they served to strengthen infantry formations and block the path of German troops in those sectors of the front where the Germans broke through the defenses), but otherwise it is an excellent film, it is much better than Bondarchuk's modern film about Stalingrad. By the way, Bondarchuk also starred in this film - the NKVD commissar wanted to shoot him (it is possible that the commissar was from the future and saw what disgusting films Bondarchuk would mak, lol).
Mosfilm learned me a lot of russian history and its people. I love to watch your films
Taught. Sorry.
Kinda hard to believe they have a Texan playing the Hero of Stalingrad.
Huge production, great film!
An amazing film and very important in this time as the US is trying but failing to destroy Russia, much like how Hitler tried and failed.
Russia will never be defeated imo.
T-34/85's in the summer of 1942? Nyet. Stalin plays his part perfectly, hope he got the best award for acting.
Get used to it, this blunder is not only in Russian and Soviet films, but also in German films.
There are a lot more running /85’s left around than /75’s so the film makers used what they could get. Older versions of all military equipment got chewed up or retired and scrapped up very fast in an all out war. There are many more P-51 fighter planes still flying than P-40’s.
Great to see an account from the Russian perspective. The casting was spot-on. All the major figures very closely resembled their historical counterpart. Particularly, Stalin and Khrushchev. Am assuming that Stalin's speech patterns were closely emulated by the actor. Stalin moves robot-like in this film. Was that his actual body language?
Yes, Stalin walked with difficulty and his hand moved poorly. The reason is that in his youth, he was a secret terrorist for the Communist Party and received just as much damage in the Russian Civil War (1918-1922). According to the memoirs of contemporaries, Stalin had the will and magnetism of an alien predator, and few could withstand his gaze. So the actor portrayed Stalin correctly.
I can't say I expected what the most replayed scene is.
Traducción al español 👍👍👍 gran parte de la humanidad es hispano hablante 😉😉😉
Quality 🎥
damn, i've been waiting to see this movie subtitled for a long time. I finally got a bootleg with a really bad google translated subtitle a few days before it was uploaded on this channel. Talk about bad timing. I'm gonna have to watch it again with a proper subtitle now
Thanks for uploading 🎉😊
Strange to see Powers Boothe in a Russian made movie playing Russian General. How did that happen?
🧐🤔
Is the scene with Churchill in Moscow historically accurate? I don’t recall such a meeting and it seems unlikely Churchill would take the incredible risk getting from London to Moscow at that point in the war.
It took place on August 12-17, 1942. The event is called the Second Moscow Conference. Churchill was really present in it. But as far as it is historically reliably filmed, I do not know for sure.
У меня в советские времена был двухтомник переписки Сталина и Черчилля. Там есть упоминание про эту конференцию.
@@Andrey_Gorbatok Thanks.
These Moscowfilm studio films are so well done. I've seen about 25 of them! Fabulous neo-realism
Nice to see Colonel Tanner have a change of heart and play for the other side after the events of RED DAWN.
I wish this was dubbed in English. Great movie about WWII history.
learn to read?
صدقنى سيكون من الجيد وضع ترجمه للغه العربيه ، أحب افلام الحرب العالمية الثانية الروسية شكراً.
Thomas Kretschmann was in the 1993 German film AND in the 2013 version directed by Fedor Bondarchuk, son of Sergei who directed the epic 1966 War and Peace.
What a gem.
Thanks a Lot Super !! +++++
It's interesting to see a Russian film from 1989, especially when things were kinda tense then, regretfully as today. Maybe one day the Russian people will find themselves a chance to elect their leaders instead of ones "appointed" for life. Democracy is not perfect, but it does allow for better economic opportunities for the people most of the time. But like anything, it can only be as good as the people in power. Thanks for the movie.
Well, the idea is to put the workers in power, instead of having a government appointed by corporations and banks.
This is an amazing film.
Kinda reminds me of thos Illustrated Classics comicbooks from the old days. I like it.
Goering is about a hundred or more pounds lighter than he really was.
As far as straight up physical appearance this movie has one of closest Hitler lookalikes I have ever seen. Stalin’s casting is also really spot on as far as the look goes.
They made Stalin 20% more dashing and skinny for the movie, which, yeah. The hair and mustache are dead on. I think the actor from the 1949 version imitates his soft-spoken demeanor better. It's interesting comparing the different ideological lenses that made him a kind father figure in one movie and a mildly incompetent sourpuss in the other.
I think this is one of the more dignified portrayals of Hitler I've seen, which makes me wonder if we don't tend to lean into the manic nincompoop depiction a little too much. But again they nailed the look, although I think he might be a tad old?
1:06:00 what a refreshing part for otherwise serious content 👍
spasibo!! tanks!!!
Poor generation, really sad, we should never forget, but we do it again
Who is the actor that plays "chuikov"?
Ive seen him in other films , im sure of it, but cant place where!!?
Was he in a spagetti western? Or james bond? Its driving me crazy lol
[Edit] oh my god its powers boothe!!!! Lol hes been in hundreds of movies!! He played the leader of the red sash gang in tombstone!!!! The bad guy in Sin city!! How did i miss that 🙄, he was speaking Russian maybe? Threw me off lol, thats my excuse anyhow!! Hehe doh feel little foolish now 😂
Excelente película, pero la podrían exibir con traducción al español ??
4K Full HD? I’m puzzled - I’ve been watching the 1960s Russian - War and Peace (the greatest epic ever made) and that really does look like the best ever HD but this looks more like basic DVD quality?
More war movies with English subs please!
WW2.
Так Советский Союз и победил во Второй мировой войне, а не Запад
Buenas noches, favor de traducir al español para poder disfrutar de la obra
Fantastic film
I like how this movie shows the stupidity in the high command of both sides of the conflict
Crazy how the actors look just like the figures they are playing.
26:50 was there also information supplied from Britain via Enigma intercepts ???
Mosfilm , thanks for the eng subs
that's crazy! powers booth is with the ruskies fighting nazis and then a few years later, he's with the wolverines fighting cubans in america!
In the first battle scene , taking place in Temoshenkos offensive in 1942' all the tanks were T34 85 s problem was they didn't exist for another couple of y3ars , where are the T34 76 s , but let's give credit , when you compare some contemporary American garbage like The Battle of the Bulge and assorted garbage , they are using Patton tanks or worse to portray WW2 tanks , so this Russian offering is far superior , but even going back to the Battleship Potemkin they always were , more historically accurate more realistic than any Hollywood rubbish regardless of the year.
We are all wet and dripping. Nice.