56:42 I don’t think it’s fair to characterize abortion as “bodily autonomy.” That just dismisses the idea that an unborn human could have rights (the ideological basis for the anti-abortion movement at large) instead of addressing it. I wish people would actually talk about the root issue (is a fetus equal or lesser than a newborn?) of abortion more often. I’ve seen exactly one person arguing at that angle in good faith for abortion from that angle, and honestly anti-abortion folks aren’t much better in that regard.
If you think a fetus has a right to a woman's body because it could keep it alive, do you think the government should be allowed to compel organ donation from living people in order to save lives? Or should people have a right to decide what happens in / with their bodies?
The actual root issue is that if abortion is illegal people will get abortions anyway, except they will be less safe. You should consider putting your energy into the welfare of babies who are born into poverty.
In the Christian dystopia you seem to champion, my 2 children, born through IVF, couldn't exist. Republican Senators have refused to sign anything into law making IVF a permanent right, keeping it tied to their agenda of controlling our personal lives. We need more atheists in our gov't to keep these "Christians" from forcing their supposed superior values on the rest of us. We don't need your "help" in making our family decisions.
Our society can't compel someone to put their life at risk without compelling justification. That's fundamental in our legal system. Science is pretty definitive about when a fetus becomes a viable human being, and the only reason you think it's ambiguous is because of anti-abortion propaganda. They love to claim it's about the life of the child, but when you look at the history and the people paying the bills behind the scenes, you discover it's really about control. They want to oppress women. Pregnancy is the most dangerous biological process a human can willingly undertake, and if technology affords a woman the control over that decision, it needs to be available to them.
i love how consistente that deck is since the first time i played him
30:50 wait, did opponent just forgot to play his 1/2 pig at the last turn?
That woulded be a tie
Not sure if your timestamp is correct because spider ham wasn’t played that game?
My bad, it was discarded by black bolt, i got confused
13 to 15 on the right is a 2 point difference pig mid makes it 13-7 more than 2 points still
56:42 I don’t think it’s fair to characterize abortion as “bodily autonomy.” That just dismisses the idea that an unborn human could have rights (the ideological basis for the anti-abortion movement at large) instead of addressing it.
I wish people would actually talk about the root issue (is a fetus equal or lesser than a newborn?) of abortion more often. I’ve seen exactly one person arguing at that angle in good faith for abortion from that angle, and honestly anti-abortion folks aren’t much better in that regard.
If you think a fetus has a right to a woman's body because it could keep it alive, do you think the government should be allowed to compel organ donation from living people in order to save lives?
Or should people have a right to decide what happens in / with their bodies?
I think you’re entirely missing out a whole person who we know 100% has rights to their own bodily autonomy, with an underdeveloped bunch of cells
The actual root issue is that if abortion is illegal people will get abortions anyway, except they will be less safe. You should consider putting your energy into the welfare of babies who are born into poverty.
In the Christian dystopia you seem to champion, my 2 children, born through IVF, couldn't exist. Republican Senators have refused to sign anything into law making IVF a permanent right, keeping it tied to their agenda of controlling our personal lives. We need more atheists in our gov't to keep these "Christians" from forcing their supposed superior values on the rest of us. We don't need your "help" in making our family decisions.
Our society can't compel someone to put their life at risk without compelling justification. That's fundamental in our legal system.
Science is pretty definitive about when a fetus becomes a viable human being, and the only reason you think it's ambiguous is because of anti-abortion propaganda. They love to claim it's about the life of the child, but when you look at the history and the people paying the bills behind the scenes, you discover it's really about control. They want to oppress women.
Pregnancy is the most dangerous biological process a human can willingly undertake, and if technology affords a woman the control over that decision, it needs to be available to them.