All Putnam integrals have tricks...

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 29 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 74

  • @FT029
    @FT029 3 года назад +64

    huh, the square root 2 was a complete distraction. great explanation!

  • @gabrielenzian6475
    @gabrielenzian6475 3 года назад +32

    could be solved in a more general way for an exponent ''u'' any of tangent, always the result pi/4

  • @VaradMahashabde
    @VaradMahashabde 3 года назад +22

    Kind of the same, but more Calc 2 oriented :
    Use the (b+a)-x substitution trick, then add the integral with it's new version

  • @jceepf
    @jceepf 3 года назад +20

    The sqrt(2), although a distraction, might actually be a hint. If you put a more reasonable exponent, you are tempted to try something else.

  • @letsthinkcritically
    @letsthinkcritically 3 года назад +10

    One special thing about this integral is that the same trick is also helpful for arbitrary powers of tan x. A very nice problem indeed.

    • @fix5072
      @fix5072 3 года назад +1

      Yes, ur method was less straight forward if one didnt knew kings rule but very elegant!

  • @VivekMuzik
    @VivekMuzik 3 года назад +3

    you can solve directly by changing variables , like it is 0 to pi/2 then you can change X into (0+pi/2 )- X ,we can do this for all function and all integrations so it will be the same integral with different look as you got it will be in form of tan(pi/2-X)^root2.you will directly jump to the point in 2nd step.it will be easy and time saving

  • @khaledajlouni6419
    @khaledajlouni6419 3 года назад +23

    You can simply express tan(x) as sin(x)/cos(x) where note that sqrt (2) is a distractor then express our integral as I,then using our reflection formula (integral of f(x) from a to b is equal to the integral of f(a+b-x) from a to b),summing them and divide by two gives the answer!

    • @vaibhavcm7503
      @vaibhavcm7503 3 года назад

      I solved this using the same method.

    • @anshumanagrawal346
      @anshumanagrawal346 3 года назад

      Can you elaborate on that

    • @fix5072
      @fix5072 3 года назад

      You dont have to Substitute in the first place, just aplly kings rule, add them up and simplify to 2I=pi/2

    • @anshumanagrawal346
      @anshumanagrawal346 3 года назад

      @@fix5072 I was thinking of the same thing, can you please explain your approach

    • @josephhajj1570
      @josephhajj1570 3 года назад

      Blackpenredpen🙌🙌

  • @azzamhassan7307
    @azzamhassan7307 3 года назад +1

    It can be solved more generally and easily if you write tan=sin/cos and the consider x=pi/2-y to obtain 2I=\int_0^pi/2 1 and then I=pi/4. This result is independent of the power over the tan in the denominator

  • @aram8832
    @aram8832 3 года назад +4

    It's easier when u use definite integral properties
    Since tan(pi/2-x) = cot(x)
    Hence 2I= pi/2
    Hence I=pi/4

  • @manucitomx
    @manucitomx 3 года назад +4

    I quite liked the approach.
    Thank you, professor!

  • @wisdomokoro8898
    @wisdomokoro8898 3 года назад +1

    Would love if you could solve recent Putnams

  • @mathflipped
    @mathflipped 3 года назад +6

    This is a nice problem. Thank you, Michael.

  • @nishanttiwary2906
    @nishanttiwary2906 3 года назад +1

    It can be solved easily using property of integrals as x => upper limit +lower limit -x and then summing the initial integral with the new one as 2I and then it will be integration of dx/2 from 0 to pi/2 I think this is a working approach as well but I do like your approach it is more Putnam style

  • @jfcrow1
    @jfcrow1 3 года назад +3

    "Some sort of trick" Exactly

  • @Harshit_Pro
    @Harshit_Pro 3 года назад +3

    Putnam Integrals are really amazing

  • @Popcorn31416
    @Popcorn31416 3 года назад

    Being a Calc 2 student who is just fed integral properties, this was really helpful in making me realize that the sqrt is just a distraction and the same thing can be done to any exponent!

  • @ianloree2784
    @ianloree2784 3 года назад +1

    Neat integral with a simple and satisfying solution!

  • @radharamana6482
    @radharamana6482 3 года назад +5

    KINGS rule also works easily

  • @coreymonsta7505
    @coreymonsta7505 3 года назад +1

    That last simplification wow

  • @egillandersson1780
    @egillandersson1780 3 года назад +2

    Just amazing !

  • @lucho2868
    @lucho2868 3 года назад +5

    Yooo I saw this same integral a couple of days ago and I memorised the thumbnail and tried it. I failed miserably but I couldn't find the fucking video with the solution again. Glad to see it called tour your attention too and that you have it solved for us

    • @forcelifeforce
      @forcelifeforce 3 года назад

      *Don't ignorantly and uncivilly curse* here because you were frustrated. It is inappropriate. You could go back and edit it again to eliminate and remove your unnecessary trash.

    • @lucho2868
      @lucho2868 3 года назад

      What the fuck bruce i dont know what you talking about. please consider not everybpdy is a native speaker

    • @lucho2868
      @lucho2868 3 года назад

      @@forcelifeforce I'm not frustrated I was grateful to see the solution. grateful and excited!! :)

    • @lucho2868
      @lucho2868 3 года назад

      @@forcelifeforce i just wanted to enfsize that it was a bummer that i lost the original video with that info

    • @lucho2868
      @lucho2868 3 года назад

      @@forcelifeforce oh shit, i understand know why you said frustrated, that kind of frustrated

  • @paokaraforlife
    @paokaraforlife 3 года назад +4

    super hard to do without thinking of the trig identity(which i didn't remember lol) but i guess that's why it's in putnam
    also for some reason integral calculators don't give an answer-presumably because ''normal'' methods can't be applied to solve it

    • @anshumanagrawal346
      @anshumanagrawal346 3 года назад +1

      Try solving it while proving/justifying every step, you'll realise it's not doable

    • @paokaraforlife
      @paokaraforlife 3 года назад +1

      @@anshumanagrawal346 what do you mean? He justified every step

    • @anshumanagrawal346
      @anshumanagrawal346 3 года назад +1

      @@paokaraforlifeI mean without using tricks like substitution, change of variables. Try to solve it as you're trying to find the area under curve

    • @paokaraforlife
      @paokaraforlife 3 года назад +1

      @@anshumanagrawal346 well yeah probably but then you can only solve it by finding the anti derivative or by approximation through the graph and that's basically guesswork

  • @alexwestworth6962
    @alexwestworth6962 3 года назад +1

    That’s the same result as A6 on the latest Putnam…

  • @Czeckie
    @Czeckie 3 года назад +3

    that's weird it does not depend on the sqrt(2)

    • @thedarkknight1865
      @thedarkknight1865 3 года назад

      Definite integral questions are never tough
      Most of them time use some property and boom you Nr Dr gets cancelled

  • @sinecurve9999
    @sinecurve9999 3 года назад +1

    6:28 A good place to stop.

  • @CTJ2619
    @CTJ2619 10 месяцев назад

    wow !! The chalk is loud in this video !

  • @yousifkhalil9655
    @yousifkhalil9655 3 года назад +1

    That was slick

  • @amirb715
    @amirb715 3 года назад +2

    it was just a week ago or so that this integral appeared on another channel, so...

  • @athysw.e.9562
    @athysw.e.9562 3 года назад +5

    I feel like there's nothing special with the sqrt(2) power. Any real power a would work

  • @shajiruby2346
    @shajiruby2346 3 года назад

    Great effort, using definite properties, would solve it in less than step and within 15 seconds at the most😉😇

  • @swatiattam8498
    @swatiattam8498 3 года назад +2

    Try RMO questions from any year after 2014

  • @prathikkannan3324
    @prathikkannan3324 3 года назад

    POV, your looking for an Indian dude explaining how its a 2 second solve using the "kings rule".

  • @fakharyarkhan5848
    @fakharyarkhan5848 3 года назад +1

    that was really cool

  • @benardolivier6624
    @benardolivier6624 3 года назад

    So the sqr(2) is used nowhere here... result is the same whatever you put in the exponent of tan(x).

  • @zenitsu4139
    @zenitsu4139 3 года назад +1

    Just apply kings property

  • @adebayoemmanuel911
    @adebayoemmanuel911 3 года назад +8

    Kings Rule!

  • @kinhcuonglucanphu1199
    @kinhcuonglucanphu1199 3 года назад

    HELP ME please int ln(sin(t) from x=0 to /sqrt(pi/2)

  • @mathematicsmi
    @mathematicsmi 3 года назад +1

    I think it’s not a trick , just a substitution.. good job btw..

  • @ashwinraj2033
    @ashwinraj2033 3 года назад +1

    This Trick Was Mind Blowing! I Am Grade 8 But Still Understand This Solution ('Cause Of You). Thank You Sir.

  • @krisnendubiswas3374
    @krisnendubiswas3374 3 года назад +1

    You won't believe I just solved this problem just hours before the video. I am class xii student from India so this is a easy one for me. Love your work!

  • @wisdomokoro8898
    @wisdomokoro8898 3 года назад

    I know you can....Emmm would just prefer 2020 Putnam competition

  • @infinityinf1
    @infinityinf1 3 года назад +3

    Can you end a video with "that's a bad place to stop" once?

  • @chessematics
    @chessematics 3 года назад

    When you realize that it came from the Letsthikcritically video

  • @akshitkumar9402
    @akshitkumar9402 3 года назад +1

    First

  • @harshparashar9210
    @harshparashar9210 3 года назад

    Nothing freaky about tricks...
    If they gonna don't give integrals without Tricks, students have to spend hours to crack them and we can find new Scientists like Einstein or Newton or may be from one of us👍👍👍

  • @dicksonchang6647
    @dicksonchang6647 3 года назад +8

    even you change √2 into an arbitrary number it still works

    • @rzno3414
      @rzno3414 3 года назад

      so we can use e or π too? wow!