In the early days Sibiya's version was not clear to his lawyers and the court. Mngo had to keep going to Sibiya to get clarity. Between them, Sibiya and Mngo, they kept tweaking the version as witnesses and new evidence came in. It is being re-tweaked by Sibiya as a solo effort now. This could prove detrimental to Sibiya's main trail as well as his trial-with-in-a-trial. What prosecution is doing now is placing Sibiya's new version on record. This will limit further tweaking of the version going forward.
I agree . From the outset there was no proper consultation between the accused and the defending lawyers . Criminal cases require too much of consultation and research. The defense relied on what they heard from the accused and seems not have scrutinized it in depth. There are many loopholes on the defense side . There is still a long journey to cross exam the accused . The defense paid more attention on the assault ignoring that there is no medical evidence or report to substantiate the alleged assault . Furthermore the answers of the Mr Sibiya are inconsistent with the questions of the defense . Several times the defense stated that the accused will say that , but now we don't hear that from the accused .
I so wish I could put this in my home language but let try King Charles language. Sibiya and Mngomezulu are not contradicting one another, it's Sibinda whose putting a wrong version to the accused. For example Gininda said he was not on a particular place, where Muzi said Gininda was also present. So Sibanda he read the last part of Mngomezulu and Gininda Cross examination. Where he said, Mngomezulu said to Gininda he must not answer for what happened in that particular place in question which I forgot, that's regards as a hearsay. Why Mngomezulu said that it is because Gininda refused to be in that place. But what was put to him is that the accused person said he was there. So for me Sibanda his the one that is putting the wrong narrative to fit his version.
Yhoooh it's painful to hear him throw Adv Mngomezulu's efforts straight into the dust bin 🚮. There are instances where he even denies what he told Advocate🤔🤔🤔
Sibande is not only dull but very disrespectful especially when he addressed the judge and the fellow learned friends he is a professional and knows the court protocol😮😮
I am not a lawyer or a judge but if i were to hear that the arrested person at some point rather requested to be kept in prison (away from police) rather than the police station, it would be ridiculous to come to a conclusion that whatever confession he made in the presence of police (which he wanted to stay away from) was made freely and voluntarily. Just logic.
at least you confirmed you are not a lawyer, we will take your opinion as that of a lay person. At law, things are not in black & white or too obvious as you may presume...
this is why Rams can’t object: If lawyer “A” is conducting a direct examination of witness “X”, then lawyer “B” (representing the same client as lawyer “A”) can't ask questions or object during cross-examination of that witness.
Guys these questions are from a form, but come on he already said that they made him sign but did not read out what was on the form, why is it difficult to understand this. A fair question to ask Muzi is if Mbotho read the proForma to him before asking him to sign
1:32:25 this feels like déjà vu, didn’t Sibanda ask these questions yesterday, why is the judge not saying kuthi this witness already said this yesterday
This boy is lying and he has selective ammensia. He only remembers only been beaten and forced to sign a written statement. He and his defense lawyer are saying something different. First sign of lying
Who's not lying coz all the cops were fabricating the story,when there were asked about recoding book there were talking differ,but this witness waz not recording anywhere
Not that he don’t remember but those questions where not asked and meaning they act as if they asked him but they didn’t and hence he says those questions where not asked and means he signed something that he didn’t write and the question where nothing to do with the statement he signed 2:21:39
If the state did not take the accused to a district surgeon to be examined whether they were assaulted or not as they alleged then the accused evidence shall stand and it will be extremely difficult for the state to prove confessions. I believe that the pathetic evidence of the dentist is going to discarded by the court..
In short, are you saying the state must take each and every person who makes a confession to the doctor? This guy is contradicting himself, everyone around him doesn't know how to do his job including his own representative. You think the court won't take that into account?
@@MahlapeShabangu-jm7em The contradictions made by the accused are not material such that the court could definitely rule in favour of the state.. there are serious material defects in the state case like the issue of assault which the state did not prove beyond doubt that the accused were never assault...that's a very serious defect in the state case...if the police were honest that the accused were never assaulted why they did not take them to a district surgeon..that evidence stand and counts heavily in favour of the accused..
@@Adjudicator246 let me correct you my friend...the onus of proof lies with the state to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt...that is not the duty of the accused by law...the accused did lay charges against themselves..the state did therefore the onus of proof lies with the state...
In the trial within a trial, it is the defence that is accusing the state of assault, so the burden of proof lies with the party making the accusation - the defence In the main trial, it is the state that is accusing the defendents of murder, so the burden of proof lies with the party making the accusation - the state
This prosecutor is well prepared and he takes the witness thru properly covering highly relevant aspects and m 99'9'9'9'% that the judge will find the confession to be admissible....he (prosecutor)'is causing a big division between the witness and his lawyer...6/2/2024
Is this Sibiya guy okay? He is not only contradicting with the court and his attorney with himself also😮😮😮😮😮Khuluma lokwatiko bhuti uphendvule kahle hhayi lokubuyela emuva utiphikise
I agree, being tortured physically, mentally or emotionally brings trauma and if one torture after the other, certain things can escape one’s mind. Anyone who has given evidence in court will know this. It becomes even more difficult if the witness is a layman. Barristers, Advocates however you want to call them, twist questions and that would irritate anyone. It does not matter how calm a person is but answering the same questions will end up irritating.
@@thandicindi6413 Agreed. Under such durress, one might not remember verbatim or with clarity. One would at least remember the gist of the questions or conversations.
When are the Khumalos coming in? When is the 2nd docket coming in? Why did the police request Chicco Twala's gun for testing? Why was there a squabble in the house between Llongwe and Zandi Khumalo? Was Llongwe Twala ever invited to that gathering at the Khumalos? If not, why wasn't he invited? At what stage did he come in? How come he left the house when his so called girlfriend was in danger after the arrival of the so-called intruders? So when he went pass the intruders carrying a gun, they just relaxed like that, not knowing whether he's going to call for help, mobilize the community to fight the two intruders, or call the cops? How did he run at disappeared, and not use one of the cars in the yard? Did he arrived at Khumalos with the car or he used public transport? When he managed to ran outside, whom did he call for help as he was not robbed of anything by the intruders? At what stage did he come back? How did he know that it was safe to come back to the Khumalos? Now second person also went pass the intruders and went outside and jumped the fence and lended up at Ncashe's yard, and the intruders allowed that to happen with no injuries sustained for defying the order to hand in all their cellphones and valuables? And he's unsure as to how many gunshot he heard while he was outside, but certain that it was two, but the third sound was not clear enough as to whether it was a gunshot or what. And Kelly Khumalo standing in the passage doing nothing to assist Senzo who was fighting with the intruder carrying the gun. And 2nd intruder with a knife/gun allowed people to went pass them to go outside, others bedroom or bathroom. And the 3rd male what happed to him did he eventually ran outside like others leaving one male against 2 male intruders. And Kelly Khumalo calling Chicco Twala to inform him about the incident while Chicco's son ran outside unharmed. And the family of the harmed, wounded and deceased are not told first. And now Tumelo Madlala telephoning Senzo's family to inform them about the incident telling them who did it and that it was a mistake, is now singing a different tune now. There's a 1000 of unconnecteddots here. Sale usubuya Nkosi Jesu.
The fact that this lawyer is using pen and paper to record and quote events that happened in the past is pathetic when looking at the fact that the accused is expected to record the past events accurately using his medulla oblongata, it raises questions as to who drafted this pathetic roman law?
You cannot under any circumstances compare a lawyer to the accused!! In case you are not aware even the defense counsels used pen and paper throughout cross examination!!!
Both of you are contradicting yourself here, all state witnesses had they testimony or statements to refer too, some were even given chance to read certain things while Sibiya has no documents and its easy to say if it's the truth you will remember yet some events took place 3 years and 5 months back. You lot are hypocrites
*"**5:18:22** A CLEAR VIEW THAT ONE HAS TO ACCOMMODATE MR SIBIYA QUESTIONING: HOW DID YOU TRAVEL? SIBIYA REPLIED "I DON'T KNOW WHERE THEY WERE TAKING ME TO" COZ SIBIYA DIDN'T UNDERSTAND THE QUESTION CLEARLY*
@@wandisilekajolinkomomphank5333it’s a pity because he is not doing himself a favour and worse he is debunking all what advocates Mngomezulu put to the court
why did he oppose to some of the other things and chose not to oppose to others?? thats being very selective. whenever he had an objection he kept raising his hand all the time
@@MjoePta he would have to raise his hand for everything he did not agree with and that would have caused a problem for him. He would be told off, as he says that he was waiting for his time to elaborate on every evidence. Given that he is a layman, he assumed because he is not trained.
So far you are the only one who thinks he is disrespectful! Everyone who is not doing what you guys want is bought or disrespectful! This guy is maintaining the court decorum and by far he is not even using emotions like the defense
That's a problem when you go to court to expect the accused persons to make sense of your senseless case. That's why Baloi 😂 ran away from X examining accused. Sibiya has won this case fair and square. Prosecutor is now asking questions that are incriminating senior police. Prosecutor admitting crime being commited😂
U Sibiya uyalazi iqiniso lento ka Angisakhumbuli kodwa ngiyakhumbula ayikho u cannot forget what questions u were asked but when specific questions that are on a document you signed without knowing what you signing u suddenly certain that those set of questions were not asked. And his got questions that he just choose not to answer. This man did confess but his legal representatives advised him wrong to deny everything and claim to be assaulted without a proof against a mountain of evidence that no where Muzi Sibiya was ever assaulted
Me and you remember that we answered questions on a question paper sometimes at school but neither of us remember those questions. But if I can ask you what was never on a question paper you will remember that the questions were not on a question paper
That was nonsense, how can you accept a dentist report when a surgeon or a GP report was meant to be, why choose to take a specialty of dentistry only to substantiate a possible assault yet the dentist is not qualified to examine and report on other body organs, for instance, how will teeth examination find or establish soft tissue injury and myalgia from crush injuries from the assault. People really are not educated I see😅😅😅😂
I think he is trying to trap Sibiya into unwittingly showing that Sibiya remembers more that what he pretend he does. Its a vary precarious position for Sibiya.
Cellphone 📱 location can be proven, they do not need to rely on car tracker. Lawyers are slow in this matter. The prosecution is using Cellphone records against the accused.
There is logic in what accused number one testimony. He is not going to validate or rely on Gininda testimony. Sibiya is sticking to his guns . Whether right or wrong. Sibiya is relying on Sibiya testimony, Sibiya is relying on Sibiya not Swanepoel 😂
Sibanda didn't get enough attention as a child probably...I'd be fcking annoyed with these nonsense questions asking the same thing again and again...akezwa yin kanti????
Sibiya is in trouble by denying everything and also not remember. He must know is there to prove his innocence.to say he was assaulted is base less bc he never opened the case and no J88 supports that. No entries in OBs supports his allegations .The man is out hau can sign the documents without knowing what is contained
Noba zange uye eskolweni, inyo ebuhlungu eyehla kuwe ingakumbi utyholwa ngokubulala umntu owayebaluleke kangaka. Iminyaka emingaka ndihleli ngenxa yobuxoki bamapolisa i would remember everyone who separated me from my family, the pain the inflicted on me, ukulibala kangaka maar asifani. Okwesbini i consultation with his lawyer is not make sure.
The version of been beaten up is very true police do that and even if u report u will not be taken seriously I have seen that happening to someone I know and when they bit u it will never be on the face cause that would be evident. So I believe the assault version the rest will have to be proven. Police assault it is a fact. When they ask u to show them where the incident happened they will bit u up till u confess. U will point out they tube them even. To report them it's a fruitless exercise
My girl have you forgotten the arrogant and rude state witnesses who who are employed by govt but disrespected the court and the defence team, witnesses who who occupies higher position, calling male advocates "bafo" that Constable Zungu - devil is a liar.
Police always assault the accused in South Africa and even if they report it it's never taken that's why they never bit u on the face they use lower parts. And sometimes if u were badly hurt they don't bring u court. They make up a story that there was no transportation
In the early days Sibiya's version was not clear to his lawyers and the court. Mngo had to keep going to Sibiya to get clarity. Between them, Sibiya and Mngo, they kept tweaking the version as witnesses and new evidence came in. It is being re-tweaked by Sibiya as a solo effort now. This could prove detrimental to Sibiya's main trail as well as his trial-with-in-a-trial. What prosecution is doing now is placing Sibiya's new version on record. This will limit further tweaking of the version going forward.
Is it tweaking or different versions because he is not truthful. Only lies change.
I agree . From the outset there was no proper consultation between the accused and the defending lawyers . Criminal cases require too much of consultation and research. The defense relied on what they heard from the accused and seems not have scrutinized it in depth. There are many loopholes on the defense side . There is still a long journey to cross exam the accused . The defense paid more attention on the assault ignoring that there is no medical evidence or report to substantiate the alleged assault . Furthermore the answers of the Mr Sibiya are inconsistent with the questions of the defense . Several times the defense stated that the accused will say that , but now we don't hear that from the accused .
The only different is if someone spoke to you can't capture all what you said and the only truths is on you , I don't blame the accused
I so wish I could put this in my home language but let try King Charles language. Sibiya and Mngomezulu are not contradicting one another, it's Sibinda whose putting a wrong version to the accused. For example Gininda said he was not on a particular place, where Muzi said Gininda was also present. So Sibanda he read the last part of Mngomezulu and Gininda Cross examination. Where he said, Mngomezulu said to Gininda he must not answer for what happened in that particular place in question which I forgot, that's regards as a hearsay. Why Mngomezulu said that it is because Gininda refused to be in that place. But what was put to him is that the accused person said he was there. So for me Sibanda his the one that is putting the wrong narrative to fit his version.
M L
Sibiya thinks that he’s smart,he is against everything that his lawyer said
He is lying bro
Yhoooh it's painful to hear him throw Adv Mngomezulu's efforts straight into the dust bin 🚮. There are instances where he even denies what he told Advocate🤔🤔🤔
Sibande is not only dull but very disrespectful especially when he addressed the judge and the fellow learned friends he is a professional and knows the court protocol😮😮
His behavior is just like his face
@@thandikote878 😂😂😂😂
😂🤣😂🤣
Loool 😅😅😅😅@@thandikote878
😂😂😂
I am not a lawyer or a judge but if i were to hear that the arrested person at some point rather requested to be kept in prison (away from police) rather than the police station, it would be ridiculous to come to a conclusion that whatever confession he made in the presence of police (which he wanted to stay away from) was made freely and voluntarily. Just logic.
at least you confirmed you are not a lawyer, we will take your opinion as that of a lay person. At law, things are not in black & white or too obvious as you may presume...
this is why Rams can’t object:
If lawyer “A” is conducting a direct examination of witness “X”, then lawyer “B” (representing the same client as lawyer “A”) can't ask questions or object during cross-examination of that witness.
Guys these questions are from a form, but come on he already said that they made him sign but did not read out what was on the form, why is it difficult to understand this. A fair question to ask Muzi is if Mbotho read the proForma to him before asking him to sign
1:32:25 this feels like déjà vu, didn’t Sibanda ask these questions yesterday, why is the judge not saying kuthi this witness already said this yesterday
Ratha is bias
Ratha is sickening to the core soooo unfair 4 an old man to behave like this yoooooh😢😢😢😢😢😢😢
The guy doesn’t remember anything except what favors his version of events. He is definitely going down
This boy is lying and he has selective ammensia. He only remembers only been beaten and forced to sign a written statement. He and his defense lawyer are saying something different. First sign of lying
Other states witness were forgetting but when it comes to this witness he lying,this witness waz not recording to the not book like other witness
Who's not lying coz all the cops were fabricating the story,when there were asked about recoding book there were talking differ,but this witness waz not recording anywhere
Police brutality is serious problems in South Africa especially against black people.
When Tumelo zungu could not remember or estimate time it was not a problem
This guy is over doing it. It is at his own peril.
One or 2 questions but selective memory is suspicious.
They are not in the box. They are not accused in this case
Not that he don’t remember but those questions where not asked and meaning they act as if they asked him but they didn’t and hence he says those questions where not asked and means he signed something that he didn’t write and the question where nothing to do with the statement he signed 2:21:39
True that and the defense would be told to be fair to the witness please while frowning and throwing hands
If the state did not take the accused to a district surgeon to be examined whether they were assaulted or not as they alleged then the accused evidence shall stand and it will be extremely difficult for the state to prove confessions. I believe that the pathetic evidence of the dentist is going to discarded by the court..
In short, are you saying the state must take each and every person who makes a confession to the doctor? This guy is contradicting himself, everyone around him doesn't know how to do his job including his own representative. You think the court won't take that into account?
@@MahlapeShabangu-jm7em
The contradictions made by the accused are not material such that the court could definitely rule in favour of the state.. there are serious material defects in the state case like the issue of assault which the state did not prove beyond doubt that the accused were never assault...that's a very serious defect in the state case...if the police were honest that the accused were never assaulted why they did not take them to a district surgeon..that evidence stand and counts heavily in favour of the accused..
@@Adjudicator246 let me correct you my friend...the onus of proof lies with the state to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt...that is not the duty of the accused by law...the accused did lay charges against themselves..the state did therefore the onus of proof lies with the state...
Danko. Most of these people that comment here knows nothing about the law. @@reubenmpilombangatha7841
In the trial within a trial, it is the defence that is accusing the state of assault, so the burden of proof lies with the party making the accusation - the defence
In the main trial, it is the state that is accusing the defendents of murder, so the burden of proof lies with the party making the accusation - the state
Ratha uthule ngathi akekho eCourt. Sibande is literally going nowhere with his questions
Sis Noxolo I disagree...the prosecutor is spot on here tearing apart the witness...(Sibiya)...6/2/2024
Are we watching the same proceedings? He is doing an impressive job of destroying this witness's testimony.
@@ThembaMayekiso-vk7us tearing accues by asking stupid questions 😂😂😂😂😂😂
This prosecutor is well prepared and he takes the witness thru properly covering highly relevant aspects and m 99'9'9'9'% that the judge will find the confession to be admissible....he (prosecutor)'is causing a big division between the witness and his lawyer...6/2/2024
Well said sir
😂😂😂But his job is to prove the state's case beyond reasonable doubt. Not you cause conflict between Muzi n Mngo😂😂
@@noxolosabulela340his job now is to get those confessions admitted and so far he’s doing well with Muzi’s selective memory
Even there Sis Noxolo the state will succeed... remember once the confession is admitted...the next thing is to wait for the sentence...6/2/2024
Well said, and most people don't see it
1:28:00 I was just waiting to hear why is the Judge not intervening to this line of questioning
Is it not a must to take a recording when taking a confession from a accused? So that you don't leave anything behind when writing a statement
The recordings done by the white judge were not accepted by defence aftetlistening to it and said it was taken unlawfully
Even the other accused can see this guy is selling himself to the state advocate 😂😂😂😂
Is this Sibiya guy okay? He is not only contradicting with the court and his attorney with himself also😮😮😮😮😮Khuluma lokwatiko bhuti uphendvule kahle hhayi lokubuyela emuva utiphikise
Will resume at 11:00, not 10 :00. They miss leading us
2:13:49 can defence be granted similar treatment by the Judge
Stupid questions from this prosecutor and this biased judge is doing nothing about it,
How irritating 🤷😡😡😡🚶
The country is watching and this we shall not pass!!!! Mark my words the state must fall. Send you vibrations out people.
What happened to Baloyi?
Maybe he was not doing a proper job🤭
Sibanda Musa ukuhlukumeza Sibiya ngoba niyalazi iqiniso.Niyamazi owabulala Senzo
And bazi.kahle
Uyaphapha lo ngoba bayazi ukuthi akambulalanga uSenzo bona nje bazifonela imali ka Chico
En bayamazi Bahama kumuvikela😢
@@Smilekeeperwabo u rich kangakanani loChicco ongakhokhela abantu abaningi kangaka I billioners
Nanikona kutetwa nge evidenceu hearsay akangen eNkanolo
Witness is sinking
...By the way, How can an experienced prosecutor forget two (only 2) lines😂😂😂
This is ridiculous 😂😂😂😂😂
It’s not the two lines , it the page where the lines can be located.
If police ask you to sign after they had beat you up can you say " No I don't want to sign without my lawyer"? Please legal people, can one do that?
Aslong usafuna induku more .wen police want u to do something they will make sure they get it.
@@NgwendeNgwende-cm2ps exactly
Now the problem is sibiya denying signing those documents. If he was saying yes he signed but under the duress and for the fear of being assaulted
@@takalaniterencekhakhu3489 but he did say he signed it
It is highly improbable the Sibiya cannot remember most events.
This is less the four years ago and he is a young man. His memory is at its prime!
I agree, being tortured physically, mentally or emotionally brings trauma and if one torture after the other, certain things can escape one’s mind. Anyone who has given evidence in court will know this. It becomes even more difficult if the witness is a layman. Barristers, Advocates however you want to call them, twist questions and that would irritate anyone. It does not matter how calm a person is but answering the same questions will end up irritating.
@@thandicindi6413 Agreed. Under such durress, one might not remember verbatim or with clarity. One would at least remember the gist of the questions or conversations.
I wonder how did Mgo feel when his client testify the opposite of his version
This prideful small prosecutor with his shoulders high like feathers of peacock even calling his learned friends by name without respect
But that what the defense was doing to Baloyi. Is it fair on others but not to others, hmmmmm
When are the Khumalos coming in? When is the 2nd docket coming in? Why did the police request Chicco Twala's gun for testing? Why was there a squabble in the house between Llongwe and Zandi Khumalo? Was Llongwe Twala ever invited to that gathering at the Khumalos? If not, why wasn't he invited? At what stage did he come in? How come he left the house when his so called girlfriend was in danger after the arrival of the so-called intruders? So when he went pass the intruders carrying a gun, they just relaxed like that, not knowing whether he's going to call for help, mobilize the community to fight the two intruders, or call the cops? How did he run at disappeared, and not use one of the cars in the yard? Did he arrived at Khumalos with the car or he used public transport? When he managed to ran outside, whom did he call for help as he was not robbed of anything by the intruders? At what stage did he come back? How did he know that it was safe to come back to the Khumalos? Now second person also went pass the intruders and went outside and jumped the fence and lended up at Ncashe's yard, and the intruders allowed that to happen with no injuries sustained for defying the order to hand in all their cellphones and valuables? And he's unsure as to how many gunshot he heard while he was outside, but certain that it was two, but the third sound was not clear enough as to whether it was a gunshot or what. And Kelly Khumalo standing in the passage doing nothing to assist Senzo who was fighting with the intruder carrying the gun. And 2nd intruder with a knife/gun allowed people to went pass them to go outside, others bedroom or bathroom. And the 3rd male what happed to him did he eventually ran outside like others leaving one male against 2 male intruders. And Kelly Khumalo calling Chicco Twala to inform him about the incident while Chicco's son ran outside unharmed. And the family of the harmed, wounded and deceased are not told first. And now Tumelo Madlala telephoning Senzo's family to inform them about the incident telling them who did it and that it was a mistake, is now singing a different tune now. There's a 1000 of unconnecteddots here. Sale usubuya Nkosi Jesu.
Sibiya is lying through his teeth.... now he is making it as if Mngomezulu came up with his own versions that are not the same as his
😂😂😂😂
Mngomezulu was telling his side of his story,I knew that I will be here telling my own side.😂😂😂😂 Kuningi kwaba ababini
Indeed he is lying, there is no way that a advocate can say this and his clients says the opposite. Something does not add up
@@johnledwaba8551 exactly!!! so according to him now his advocate has been fabricating some of the things
@@MjoePta it seems so
Sibanda is asking the same question he asked yesterday u Judge naye okare o tshweri ke stroke, he is no quite. NPA is wasting our time lana
That's for the defense to raise an objections
The fact that this lawyer is using pen and paper to record and quote events that happened in the past is pathetic when looking at the fact that the accused is expected to record the past events accurately using his medulla oblongata, it raises questions as to who drafted this pathetic roman law?
You cannot under any circumstances compare a lawyer to the accused!! In case you are not aware even the defense counsels used pen and paper throughout cross examination!!!
Futhermore you will neverforget the details when something very bad that turned your life around but again people are not the same
Both of you are contradicting yourself here, all state witnesses had they testimony or statements to refer too, some were even given chance to read certain things while Sibiya has no documents and its easy to say if it's the truth you will remember yet some events took place 3 years and 5 months back. You lot are hypocrites
@@MahlapeShabangu-jm7emsometimes one would wonder if really understand & follow court procedures and proceedings yhaz
I still repeat myself when a painful experience happen to you, you never forget unless you made it up, lies and foction can be eadily forgotten
Waze wabhatyaza ummeli wombuso fiddling with a lot of paperwork
Please bring back Baloyi... that man is the best in articulation, conduct & reason...
This case is so difficult 🤔🤞🤞
*"**5:18:22** A CLEAR VIEW THAT ONE HAS TO ACCOMMODATE MR SIBIYA QUESTIONING: HOW DID YOU TRAVEL? SIBIYA REPLIED "I DON'T KNOW WHERE THEY WERE TAKING ME TO" COZ SIBIYA DIDN'T UNDERSTAND THE QUESTION CLEARLY*
Sibiya kodwa out of 100% of questions asked you only agreed to 12% of them, 88% uyaphika you are digging own grave bhuti
Sibiya is right or even anyone who is on the stand, you say something that you are not sure of because you might incriminate yourself
when u telling the truth its easy to remember everything but when u lying ull end up not answering
@@wandisilekajolinkomomphank5333it’s a pity because he is not doing himself a favour and worse he is debunking all what advocates Mngomezulu put to the court
So you expect him to agree even if it's not what happened so that he can match the story of Vaseline and Ginyimbila????
Are you ready
1:18:34 Rams was not involved in Trial within Trial
He was. Remember around the time he introduced Adv Mngo. Also, he didn't deny it when it was mentioned in court today?
How are the layman witnesses expected to know that they supposed to oppose everything said by the police? Is this clout chasing Advocate ok?
This clout chasing advocate is on his way to getting a conviction! Those who know, know this!!!
why did he oppose to some of the other things and chose not to oppose to others?? thats being very selective. whenever he had an objection he kept raising his hand all the time
@@MjoePta he would have to raise his hand for everything he did not agree with and that would have caused a problem for him. He would be told off, as he says that he was waiting for his time to elaborate on every evidence. Given that he is a layman, he assumed because he is not trained.
Layman or killer hitman he know everything about court cases
Cloud chaser enje
This small baloyi is badgering the witness and is very disrespectful
So far you are the only one who thinks he is disrespectful! Everyone who is not doing what you guys want is bought or disrespectful! This guy is maintaining the court decorum and by far he is not even using emotions like the defense
He is disrespectful I agree with you
I like how Mtanzi is laughing at Sibiya
Lol...Ratha not impressed with Sibande...he says: how can you forget two lines...looking irritated 😅
That's a problem when you go to court to expect the accused persons to make sense of your senseless case. That's why Baloi 😂 ran away from X examining accused. Sibiya has won this case fair and square. Prosecutor is now asking questions that are incriminating senior police. Prosecutor admitting crime being commited😂
U must be watching a different case
Looool
Really that's why make any excuse,Baloi he's trouble coz on this case,since from reginal court the pay him to miss lead the case
This prosecutor seems to "not make sure"
*"IMAGINE SIBIYA HAS TO MAN-UP ON HIS OWN WHILE BEING PTSD BY moloyi, gininda, rotha AND "A FET SO NEED A COMFORT BREAK!!!!"*
Ratha is biases judge
More than the word it's so evident
U Sibiya uyalazi iqiniso lento ka Angisakhumbuli kodwa ngiyakhumbula ayikho u cannot forget what questions u were asked but when specific questions that are on a document you signed without knowing what you signing u suddenly certain that those set of questions were not asked. And his got questions that he just choose not to answer. This man did confess but his legal representatives advised him wrong to deny everything and claim to be assaulted without a proof against a mountain of evidence that no where Muzi Sibiya was ever assaulted
Me and you remember that we answered questions on a question paper sometimes at school but neither of us remember those questions. But if I can ask you what was never on a question paper you will remember that the questions were not on a question paper
Evidence of the dentist will be accepted bc he is a profession in his work rather than a layman
But his evidence is neither here nor there, all he had to do was check if he had a gold tooth or not. Anything else there is no proof
That was nonsense, how can you accept a dentist report when a surgeon or a GP report was meant to be, why choose to take a specialty of dentistry only to substantiate a possible assault yet the dentist is not qualified to examine and report on other body organs, for instance, how will teeth examination find or establish soft tissue injury and myalgia from crush injuries from the assault. People really are not educated I see😅😅😅😂
Mr procecutor you are confused,you taking statements from accused 1 instead accused 2.
I think he is trying to trap Sibiya into unwittingly showing that Sibiya remembers more that what he pretend he does. Its a vary precarious position for Sibiya.
Confused nje lo.. Ayikho indaba yakhe
He is craving fat cakes (amagwinya)
@@noxolosabulela340He's trying to be famous.
This, I don't remember, doesn't help him
Kwenzakalani guys
Cellphone 📱 location can be proven, they do not need to rely on car tracker. Lawyers are slow in this matter. The prosecution is using Cellphone records against the accused.
There is logic in what accused number one testimony. He is not going to validate or rely on Gininda testimony. Sibiya is sticking to his guns . Whether right or wrong. Sibiya is relying on Sibiya testimony, Sibiya is relying on Sibiya not Swanepoel 😂
😂😂😂mxm Sibande naye.. kwezinye izindawo uya phulwa umthetho akazi yen🚮
Sibanda forgets two lines.
Sibanda didn't get enough attention as a child probably...I'd be fcking annoyed with these nonsense questions asking the same thing again and again...akezwa yin kanti????
Etsho ngobubi
Ne voice ebhorayo
Ths guy is asking 1 question 10 times
Sibiya is in trouble by denying everything and also not remember. He must know is there to prove his innocence.to say he was assaulted is base less bc he never opened the case and no J88 supports that. No entries in OBs supports his allegations .The man is out hau can sign the documents without knowing what is contained
He was beaten he even said he was scared of his life that is why he signed n how can he open a case while they where beating him
Ejele kulapho eyakhona uSibiya
I warmed up to Rams today.
Wiiiiii Nsibande, unescefe
Wena judge khohlakele kabi
Yes very arrogant yoh WHY RATHA IS KEEPING QUIET NOW ....ALL ALONG HE WAS JUMPING AND SIDING WITH THE WITNESSES...
This guy is not a witness. He is the accused and so far everyone who is doing their job is either lying or incompetent including his own defense 😂
The moment he ascends to the witness box, he becomes a witness not the accused.
weak prosecutor but prideful
Ngobubi
He's trying to push performance bethuna 😂😂😂😂
Very weak indeed
Poor microphone. Motshwareng microphone a run 😂😂😂
This procecutor is too weak, n going in circles
USibiya uthi uMngomezulu uthethe into engekho and amaphoyisa nawo athethe amanga nguye kuphela othetha inyani😂😂😂
Uucabanga ukuthi uhlakaniphile
Nami ngihleli ngicabanga leyonto coz uphikisa izinto ezashiwo ummeli wakhe uphikisa okwashiwo amaphoyisa, i guess naleli Judge if limthola enecala uzothi iyabheda uyena osho into e right
Not bad at all sibiya, He knows you on track, keep it that way bafo
*"A QUESTION OF THE HIGHEST LEVEL OF EDUCATION" SHOULD HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED TO SIBIYA. (ADV MSHOLOLO)"*
Noba zange uye eskolweni, inyo ebuhlungu eyehla kuwe ingakumbi utyholwa ngokubulala umntu owayebaluleke kangaka. Iminyaka emingaka ndihleli ngenxa yobuxoki bamapolisa i would remember everyone who separated me from my family, the pain the inflicted on me, ukulibala kangaka maar asifani. Okwesbini i consultation with his lawyer is not make sure.
Sibiya sinawe mfethu. Qina nje.
Sibiya is spot on in his answers regarding the assault 😂 and trauma 😂
VOUS SA Vai que je mapai senzo
With this judge, all accused r guilty,
Sibiya's thinks more than the graduates. Yes a picture IA lighter than the original. Why do they want marks on a picture while the assaulted is there
Which minute was that moment?
How do even prove that the current marks are due to that purppoted assault? Sibiya is a carrier criminal eho gets handcuffed time and again
The version of been beaten up is very true police do that and even if u report u will not be taken seriously I have seen that happening to someone I know and when they bit u it will never be on the face cause that would be evident. So I believe the assault version the rest will have to be proven. Police assault it is a fact. When they ask u to show them where the incident happened they will bit u up till u confess. U will point out they tube them even. To report them it's a fruitless exercise
But the confession will not be of something one didn't do
But the confession will not be of something one didn't do
A very weak prosecutor
Very weak indeed!
And arrogant
Sibiya usegcine wakwazi ukuphendula imibuzo yalezi khohlakali...
Nabo Tumelo Madlala kwakunjalo bakhumbula abathandayo nawe Sibiya do the same
Sibanda is asking stupid questions...how can you ask if Sibiya is not scared in court when seeing the cops. His save than in the police sells
AI BO USIBANDA UZOZIZWA AMANDLA NGO SIBIYA, ULOKHU EBUZANA NENTO EYODWA.
Basebenza kanjalo inhloso ukumdida ngemibuzo
What a disgrace
1:28:59 Thanks to the Judge. Defence not doing their Job
Sibiya contradicted himself
is true
Sibiya is very rude he needs to come down and answer the questions
My girl have you forgotten the arrogant and rude state witnesses who who are employed by govt but disrespected the court and the defence team, witnesses who who occupies higher position, calling male advocates "bafo" that Constable Zungu - devil is a liar.
Ngamxoxela ummeli kusho.inkabi🤣
So Mbotho answered the handcuff question after the he completed the document, or somehow he new about the swelling before he saw the injuries 😂😂😂😂
Imibuzo iyacika straight
Very weak prosecutor indeed
😅😢
Police always assault the accused in South Africa and even if they report it it's never taken that's why they never bit u on the face they use lower parts. And sometimes if u were badly hurt they don't bring u court. They make up a story that there was no transportation
Mngomezulu is fired by Sibiya 😂😂😂
Izizwana azihloni nje