An EDF is a jet engine. A jet is a high velocity stream of gas or liquid. It is a jet engine because it projects such a jet. You don't have to burn fuel to produce a jet. This is a common misconception. Jet is the propulsion produced, that's all.
@@shelbyseelbach9568 there is no compression or combustion chamber involved in this, it would be far more reasonable to classify this as an EDF, calling it a jet engine is certainly pushing the common accepted understanding quite a bit in my opinion. By your definition a simple spinning fan would classify as a jet engine
@@nic.h no it wouldn't, exaggerating won't make you right either. You are cracking me up, man. Not liking a fact won't change it, no matter how hard you try. An EDF is a jet engine, there is nothing you can dsay to change that. Combustion is only required of a jet engine in your mind. LMFAO!
@@nicholasjensen8016 An EDF, is a jet engine. Jet refers to the thrust produced by the high velocity stream of air that exits the rear of the motor assembly. It's not a turbojet, which is powered by a gas turbine, but it is ABSOLUTELY a jet engine in every possible way, my friend.
You've created an overly complicated convergent/divergent ejector nozzle - it's not vector thrust unless you deflect the output thrust off axis of the engine, but it's still cool none the less. The motors can be linked to 'pitch', 'roll' and 'yaw' channels on a controller to provide the vector thrust function since you made 4 sectors of independent deflection possible. The purpose of a convergent/divergent nozzle is to control potential back pressure which can limit the exhaust velocity and thus reducing efficiency. I highly doubt a simple EDF is going to benefit from such a nozzle but it looks bad ass none the less!
Her didn't say turbine. He said jet. A jet is a high velocity stream of gas or liquid and can be produced by many different devices, which are all essentially ducted fans of one type or another. Yes, this is a jet.
@@cameronwilson1815 Wrong, this is an engine that produces a jet, making it a, wait for it, jet engine. en·gine /ˈenjən/ noun 1. a machine with moving parts that converts power into motion. Want to try again?
@@shelbyseelbach9568 Actually, a jet engine is a jet that makes thrust using Jet propulsion, Jet engine Aircraft engine type A jet engine is a type of reaction engine discharging a fast-moving jet that generates thrust by jet propulsion. Jet propulsion is the propulsion of an object in one direction, produced by ejecting a jet of fluid in the opposite direction. By Newton's third law, the moving body is propelled in the opposite direction to the jet. And jet propulsion is when a matter is injected into a rocket to make it move. The term jet propulsion refers to the action produced by a reactor to the ejection of matter. For example, when the matter in a typical rocket (like gunpowder in fireworks) is ignited, the resulting chemical reaction produces heat and gases, which escape from the rocket and cause it to move forward. So therefore, this isn't a jet engine, it's an edf jet, a jet not a jet engine.
It is NOT a *vector* thrust. It is adjustable exhaust. It is not the same thing. With a vector thrust, you adjust the ANGLE of the thrust, not the diameter of the exhaust.
Someday when 3D-printed metal parts become feasible, your design will work great. OR the other way round : When plastic jet engine technology becomes mature. Or break-thru in plastic materials which can withstand immense heat/pressure.
Rather than BLDC motors, try to attach real fuel operated micro jet engine to main turbine and make the body with carbon fiber so that when you attach that fuel operated micro jet engine, the outer body will not melt.
"...That can actually work..." Brah....stop making videos, start selling whatever it is you're smoking - you will make SO MUCH MONEY. It's not a jet engine. AT BEST its a model, and that's me being VERY VERY GENEROUS. A jet engine works in a fairly specific way to generate thrust. It has complicated innards. Your model HAS NO INNARDS AT ALL. IT LOOKS NICE! It's a well modeled exterior model....but calling it a working jet engine is....well if you had made an attempt at modeling the insides, I'd call it laughable. As it is, it's just kinda disappointing.
A jet engine is a jet because of the high velocity steam of air that it produces, not because of how it is produced. This is absolutely a jet. You have bought into a common misconception, and you are talking about a turbine engine, they are all jets. Just like a jet ski which doesn't use a turbine either but definitely produces a jet for propulsion.
@@shelbyseelbach9568 actually this is an Electric Ducted Fan. A Jet engine has to have a combustion chamber after the compressor ( fan ) Next we should point out that it’s not vector thrust, as this can’t redirect the thrust in any specific direction, and just restricts/condenses it some. Looks good, but again not a jet; an Electric Ducted Fan
@@geauxracerx no, it doesn't have to have a combustion chamber after the fan. Never said it was thrust vectoring. Actually said it wasn't, actually said that directly to you. At this point, you are talking in circles, trying so hard to be correct. It's hilarious. Keep it coming.
@@shelbyseelbach9568 open air propellers create thrust. Jet engines absolutely require a combustion chamber. In fact the main classifier designating Jet engine is that it has a combustion chamber. That’s the only thing that sets it apart from a Ducted Fan. While Ducted fans are any Propeller/impeller in side a Duct. Which can amplify the propellers thrust 2-5 times its open air performance. Even Rocket engines are “jet” engines. Water impellers loosely apply, but only in the loosest definition. If you were to look to buy this type of propulsion ( cuz they are readily available and used often ) you wouldn’t search for a jet engine you’d search specifically for an Electric Ducted Fan. Which in the description would clearly state not a jet engine.
@@geauxracerx that doesn't mean it doesn't fit the definition of a jet engine, as an edf is a jet engine, a rose by any other name would smell the same. You can call ir whatever you want, it is an engine producing thrust with a jet of air.
jet engine [jet ˈenjən] NOUN an engine using jet propulsion for forward thrust, mainly used for aircraft. jet [jet] NOUN a rapid stream of liquid or gas forced out of a small opening. engine [ˈenjən] NOUN a machine with moving parts that converts power into motion. In every way, this is a JET ENGINE! You have bought into a misconception, that you believe is a fact, that simply isn't. A turbojet engine is what you are describing, it is only ONE type of jet engine, just like this is.
It looks cool but that's about it. Why thrust vectoring on a land based vehicle? Just added weight. The motor looked way too small for the size of the fan. I wouldn't trust a 3D printed fan unless you want to be scale Pratt and Whitney engine that can throw blades. More interesting if it is for an airplane.
Didn't see the follow-up video on this in any of your vids (did I not see it?). Didn't work out? Not spec'ing the thrust, etc. Your blisk design looks a bit sketchy for getting thrust from a motor (pretty is pretty, but functional is where the performance is).. but nice design overall. Too bad it didn't work out.
changing the exhaust opening is NOT thrust vectoring!, thrust vectoring is the abllity to change the output of thrust NOT parallel to the exhaust output
No, a jet engine is required to produce a jet (high velocity stream of gas or liquid), you afte taking specifically of a turbine jet. The jet is the propulsion, the turbine is how it is produced. I've never turbine fuel in a jet ski, yet it produces jet propulsion also. A jet can be produced by anything that soins a ducted fan at high speed. That's all a turbine is, a ducted fan with a burner and turbine to power it.
hola muy buenas noches tu tienes una impresora en 3d me podrias crear una turbina de un b757 -200 amodelo escala 1:200 / 1:400 y una aleta de lado izquierda del mismo modelo es aviones a escala armable rebell
An EDF which produces a jet (a high velocity stream of gas or liquid). A turbine linked to a ducted fan is called a turbojet (for the turbine powering the fan and for the jet the fan produces). An edf is the same thing powered by an electric motor. They are both jets, as that is the propulsion they produce.
its an EDF. Not a jet engine. No chemical combustion, so its not a jet engine. Also that is not thrust vectoring. Thats just making the exhaust smaller (less efficient).I guess you could add thrust vectoring for your EDF in software. But still nice work.
jet engine [jet ˈenjən] NOUN an engine using jet propulsion for forward thrust, mainly used for aircraft. jet [jet] NOUN a rapid stream of liquid or gas forced out of a small opening. engine [ˈenjən] NOUN a machine with moving parts that converts power into motion. In every way, this is a JET ENGINE! You have bought into a misconception, that you believe is a fact, that simply isn't. A turbojet engine is what you are describing, it is only ONE type of jet engine, just like this is.
Super design but your concept is fundamentally flawed as if anything it’s an EDF not a jet engine. You can’t claim that it’s a model of a jet engine either since it’s only a casing, nozzle and main fan disk. It a very nice looking but inefficient EDF, I mean your fan is glued to the shaft!! I love the ingenuity of the vectored thrust design, to work effectively in a real application it would have to be located further downstream but you concept exhibits nice out the box thinking which ultimately leads to innovation but this one has a long way to go.
jet engine [jet ˈenjən] NOUN an engine using jet propulsion for forward thrust, mainly used for aircraft. jet [jet] NOUN a rapid stream of liquid or gas forced out of a small opening. engine [ˈenjən] NOUN a machine with moving parts that converts power into motion. In every way, this is a JET ENGINE! You have bought into a misconception, that you believe is a fact, that simply isn't. A turbojet engine is what you are describing, it is only ONE type of jet engine, just like this is.
@@shelbyseelbach9568 what I bought into was a ton of study materials, lecturers and hours of study, not to mention thousands of hours working in the field. In aeronautics, a jet engine is exclusively an engine that utilizes compression and combustion to produce thrust, pulsejets, ramjets, scramjets and any unconventional variation of the original jet engine, turbojet, UHB, HB all compress and combust air in one way or another exhausting it to produce thrust. There is a completely separate technology presumptuously called a 'fanjet', which like the electric ducted fan or ducted fan utilizes a ducted fan for thrust, sometimes compressing the air through a narrowing nozzle but devoid of any type of combustion, not commonly found in aviation but frequently found in model aeronautics. What many developers and manufacturers and even hobbyists experimenting with DF's and EDFs have found is that modern jet engine fan designs are not suitable for the high rpm ducted fans, I could get into the science of ducted fans and why that is but suffice it to say it is a completely separate technology from jet engines and what this guy has produced, albeit very nicely produced is a good looking EDF that will not be as efficient as one designed purely for the application because he based it on the aesthetic of a jet engine. This is a tired discussion found on many hundreds of YT videos and modelling forums
@@wingnutzster Exactly, all of that has led you to believe that this is not a jet engine, in spite of the facts presented. Once again, this meets all the requirements of a jet engine, he never said turbojet, he never said scramjet, he never said pulse jet, he never said ram jet. You'll notice that all in of these jet thrust producing motors, the word jet is accompanied by its power source to name them. This is because they are all jets, just like this one is. I understand what you think a jet motor has to be, you are simply wrong in the thought, that's all. A common misconception. The coolest part about the whole thing is it doesn't even matter if you agree. Agreeing is not required to be wrong, in fact, they almost never go together.
@@shelbyseelbach9568 Semantics, if a guy claims that he built a jet engine and proceeds to produce something that in almost every way at least externally represents a small Williams or P&W on popular media he is most likely not describing a 'jet' according to Newton's law, that's a given, it is smart alec to then come along and claim 'well even a water jet is a jet' because that is not what he is illustrating. Technically and professionally speaking what he has produced is an inefficient ducted fan engine - by your thinking, are we to call a rapidly deflating balloon a 'jet engine'? We don't called ducted fan's 'jet engines' in the same way we don't call birds 'avians'. The proper term for what the laypeople call 'jet engines' is turbines, yes and that defines it more accurately but what was proposed here was a working scaled jet engine in the layman's sense.
@@shelbyseelbach9568 the same can be argued about his claim of 'vectored thrust' - what he created was a variable nozzle and not what is generally referred to as vectored thrust but one could be a smart alec and say theoretically the thrust is still being vectored and thus he is correct...when he isn't.
jet engine [jet ˈenjən] NOUN an engine using jet propulsion for forward thrust, mainly used for aircraft. jet [jet] NOUN a rapid stream of liquid or gas forced out of a small opening. engine [ˈenjən] NOUN a machine with moving parts that converts power into motion. In every way, this is a JET ENGINE! You have bought into a misconception, that you believe is a fact, that simply isn't. A turbojet engine is what you are describing, it is only ONE type of jet engine, just like this is.
Not a jet engine, not even a model jet engine, its a ported fan. Shoddy masking, runs everywhere. Ludicrously under-specified motor mount, printed in PLA (Motors get hot)... Made me laugh my tits off, but you dont get a like and I wouldnt subscribe for that if you paid me. You need to level up your skills dude, sorry but there it is.
@@scaleaddiction You dont know who I am, do you lol. Thats fine by me, but I'm reputed to be the most skilled man on the planet. Designer, photorealist artist, multi-instrument musician, genius mathematician, programmer and hardware engineer. I dont have a channel because my voice would be lost among the wannabes unless I whored myself, and frankly I'm a disabilities carer and activist, not a celebrity. And, yes I can, my friend. In wood, metal, cardboard, polystyrene and virtual without using proprietary software besides a 3D printer. hackaday.io/Jez.Boxall Take care, and please, just put a little more effort into your finished project because it comes across as careless clickbait if you dont iterate or polish your work. Sorry you caught me in a bad mood ;-)
jet engine [jet ˈenjən] NOUN an engine using jet propulsion for forward thrust, mainly used for aircraft. jet [jet] NOUN a rapid stream of liquid or gas forced out of a small opening. engine [ˈenjən] NOUN a machine with moving parts that converts power into motion. In every way, this is a JET ENGINE! You have bought into a misconception, that you believe is a fact, that simply isn't. A turbojet engine is what you are describing, it is only ONE type of jet engine, just like this is.
@@shelbyseelbach9568 By your definition then, it is a poorly designed and badly executed model jet engine. Really, at this point I'm not sure who you are trolling - me, OP or yourself.
yes buddy! looks wicked!
Thanks bro ✌✌
First pilot test!
InstaBlaster
Well done. Great work. But i would not call it a jet engine. It is „only“ an EDF.
I respect that, but it looks like a jet engine 🙏🏻🙏🏻😅
@@scaleaddictionYou are right. It looks and sounds amazing 👍
An EDF is a jet engine. A jet is a high velocity stream of gas or liquid. It is a jet engine because it projects such a jet. You don't have to burn fuel to produce a jet. This is a common misconception. Jet is the propulsion produced, that's all.
@@shelbyseelbach9568 there is no compression or combustion chamber involved in this, it would be far more reasonable to classify this as an EDF, calling it a jet engine is certainly pushing the common accepted understanding quite a bit in my opinion.
By your definition a simple spinning fan would classify as a jet engine
@@nic.h no it wouldn't, exaggerating won't make you right either.
You are cracking me up, man. Not liking a fact won't change it, no matter how hard you try. An EDF is a jet engine, there is nothing you can dsay to change that. Combustion is only required of a jet engine in your mind. LMFAO!
Not vectored thrust just necking down to smaller diameter
Also not a jet engine. Just a ducted fan..
@@nicholasjensen8016 An EDF, is a jet engine. Jet refers to the thrust produced by the high velocity stream of air that exits the rear of the motor assembly. It's not a turbojet, which is powered by a gas turbine, but it is ABSOLUTELY a jet engine in every possible way, my friend.
You've created an overly complicated convergent/divergent ejector nozzle - it's not vector thrust unless you deflect the output thrust off axis of the engine, but it's still cool none the less. The motors can be linked to 'pitch', 'roll' and 'yaw' channels on a controller to provide the vector thrust function since you made 4 sectors of independent deflection possible.
The purpose of a convergent/divergent nozzle is to control potential back pressure which can limit the exhaust velocity and thus reducing efficiency. I highly doubt a simple EDF is going to benefit from such a nozzle but it looks bad ass none the less!
amazed at the 3 dimensional printer
Extraordinary imagination 💭
Thanks for turning in 🙏🏻
You make the most impressive models! Nice work!
Thanks brother, ✌✌🙏🏻
The intro got me. You won a sub!
Thanks, appreciate that
Amazing Misster..Meshine to Plan Enginering...
The Lipo you showed is still good to go. I've used worse than yours and still worked fine (although not recommended 😂)
Fantastic Work, looks very good.!!
Thanks
That’s cool! Better mount it on a car, gives more speed and horsepower combined with a little spoiler! ;)
Looks amazing but its more like edf not even turbine , great job anyways , subs
Her didn't say turbine. He said jet. A jet is a high velocity stream of gas or liquid and can be produced by many different devices, which are all essentially ducted fans of one type or another. Yes, this is a jet.
@@shelbyseelbach9568 Actually, he said jet engine, this isn't a jet engine, this is a jet. So you are right and wrong.
@@cameronwilson1815 Wrong, this is an engine that produces a jet, making it a, wait for it, jet engine.
en·gine
/ˈenjən/
noun
1.
a machine with moving parts that converts power into motion.
Want to try again?
@@shelbyseelbach9568 Actually, a jet engine is a jet that makes thrust using Jet propulsion, Jet engine
Aircraft engine type
A jet engine is a type of reaction engine discharging a fast-moving jet that generates thrust by jet propulsion.
Jet propulsion is the propulsion of an object in one direction, produced by ejecting a jet of fluid in the opposite direction. By Newton's third law, the moving body is propelled in the opposite direction to the jet.
And jet propulsion is when a matter is injected into a rocket to make it move.
The term jet propulsion refers to the action produced by a reactor to the ejection of matter. For example, when the matter in a typical rocket (like gunpowder in fireworks) is ignited, the resulting chemical reaction produces heat and gases, which escape from the rocket and cause it to move forward.
So therefore, this isn't a jet engine, it's an edf jet, a jet not a jet engine.
@@cameronwilson1815 yes it is, try all the semantics you want, in every sense of the word, this IS a jet engine.
wala zor jwan darchua dast xosh
Supas bram
It is NOT a *vector* thrust. It is adjustable exhaust. It is not the same thing. With a vector thrust, you adjust the ANGLE of the thrust, not the diameter of the exhaust.
Gooooooooow🔥
Where is the next video? 🥺
Coming soon
@@scaleaddiction 👍👍
I brought this model to print but it has some issues being sliced.. any tips? I tried in Cura and my main slicer Simplify3d
if you now add Stators behind the Rotor you even get more thrust and airspeed.....
and there is no real Thrust vectoring ;)
Ya could put the Guns N' Roses logo on it if the entire engine calling was all scarlet red.
This looks super cool!
You’ll be popular one day!
Btw I have the same mouse as you :)
Thanks, that's my favorite mouse ✌🙏🏻
I NOTICED THE SAME THING I HAVE THE EXACT SAME MOUSE
would it give enough trust for an rc airplane i wonder? cuz that would be sick
looks awesome! How was the thrust? You might try incorporating it onto a small hover craft design for taking advantage of the vectoring. Subscribed!
That's a good idea, maybe in the future videos, thanks
Very cool !!
Thanks for watching
Lots of excellent work, a great project, but ultimately useless unless it'll actually move the car...
That's good!👍👍👍
Thanks! 😃
Can I ask what is the maximum thrust it can produce or is it just a model? Thanks!
I'm pretty sure he wasn't going to answer that question lol.
1:31 any one know what this song called?
I'm need that jet engine for the 200mm hover raft I'm building lmao
Doesn't look like vectored thrust to me. Vectored Thrust changes the direction of the thrust, this model just squeezes the thrust down.
Good 💝💝💝👌👌👌👍
Thanks
Nice work! I've always wanted to see an rc car with a jet on the back.. i wonder how that will affect the car. Where r u from BTW?
Thanks man, I will do the test video too, driving on my car, I. Form iraq
Someday when 3D-printed metal parts become feasible,
your design will work great.
OR the other way round :
When plastic jet engine technology becomes mature.
Or break-thru in plastic materials which can
withstand immense heat/pressure.
I tried to make one but it melted on heat
Very interesting nice looking
🔵🔵🔵👍👍👍😀😀😀🔵🔵🔵
Thanks for watching
nice one!
Thanks
Where is the video of this working? Searched your channel but didn't see it
it will be soon, i just haven't edit the video yet
Can you please build the X-31 vectorized system?
ooooooooooo.it is very good
Amazing!!!... I still want the files for the Zero Fux Hilux tho... 😊😊😁
Hey Monsters parts, well it's up to kpoprc, ✌🤜🤛
Amazing
Thanks
cool！👌😁
Thanks
สวยแต่เพื่อนแล้ว555+
Rather than BLDC motors, try to attach real fuel operated micro jet engine to main turbine and make the body with carbon fiber so that when you attach that fuel operated micro jet engine, the outer body will not melt.
Would be so cool to add an afterburner
"...That can actually work..." Brah....stop making videos, start selling whatever it is you're smoking - you will make SO MUCH MONEY. It's not a jet engine. AT BEST its a model, and that's me being VERY VERY GENEROUS. A jet engine works in a fairly specific way to generate thrust. It has complicated innards. Your model HAS NO INNARDS AT ALL.
IT LOOKS NICE! It's a well modeled exterior model....but calling it a working jet engine is....well if you had made an attempt at modeling the insides, I'd call it laughable. As it is, it's just kinda disappointing.
A jet engine is a jet because of the high velocity steam of air that it produces, not because of how it is produced. This is absolutely a jet. You have bought into a common misconception, and you are talking about a turbine engine, they are all jets. Just like a jet ski which doesn't use a turbine either but definitely produces a jet for propulsion.
@@shelbyseelbach9568 actually this is an Electric Ducted Fan. A Jet engine has to have a combustion chamber after the compressor ( fan )
Next we should point out that it’s not vector thrust, as this can’t redirect the thrust in any specific direction, and just restricts/condenses it some.
Looks good, but again not a jet; an Electric Ducted Fan
@@geauxracerx no, it doesn't have to have a combustion chamber after the fan. Never said it was thrust vectoring. Actually said it wasn't, actually said that directly to you. At this point, you are talking in circles, trying so hard to be correct. It's hilarious. Keep it coming.
@@shelbyseelbach9568 open air propellers create thrust. Jet engines absolutely require a combustion chamber. In fact the main classifier designating Jet engine is that it has a combustion chamber. That’s the only thing that sets it apart from a Ducted Fan. While Ducted fans are any Propeller/impeller in side a Duct. Which can amplify the propellers thrust 2-5 times its open air performance. Even Rocket engines are “jet” engines. Water impellers loosely apply, but only in the loosest definition.
If you were to look to buy this type of propulsion ( cuz they are readily available and used often ) you wouldn’t search for a jet engine you’d search specifically for an Electric Ducted Fan. Which in the description would clearly state not a jet engine.
@@geauxracerx that doesn't mean it doesn't fit the definition of a jet engine, as an edf is a jet engine, a rose by any other name would smell the same. You can call ir whatever you want, it is an engine producing thrust with a jet of air.
do you have a link to the motor you used?
www.amazon.com/BGNing-Brushless-Outrunner-Controller-Quadcopter/dp/B00PXVWFQS/ref=sr_1_23?dchild=1&keywords=1400kv+brushless+drone+motor&qid=1614964265&s=toys-and-games&sr=1-23
Get that battery yet???
Yes, i will test in the video soon
@@scaleaddiction we're all looking forward to it. 👍
If I mounted on a plane which made by plastic it could fly
For Sale for Brazil??? How many? With post?
Only one problem, it’s a ducted fan not a jet engine.
Did anyone paid and recieved the 3d printing file ?
Wow.
Pretty cool, but thats just an edf, not a jet engine
no other rotor blades to compress? BAD!
Where is the "jet"? Just a ducted fan for what is see... It's wicked-looking tho.
jet engine
[jet ˈenjən]
NOUN
an engine using jet propulsion for forward thrust, mainly used for aircraft.
jet
[jet]
NOUN
a rapid stream of liquid or gas forced out of a small opening.
engine
[ˈenjən]
NOUN
a machine with moving parts that converts power into motion.
In every way, this is a JET ENGINE!
You have bought into a misconception, that you believe is a fact, that simply isn't. A turbojet engine is what you are describing, it is only ONE type of jet engine, just like this is.
cool
Thanks
Have you actually tested that engine in flight yet? Do you sell these files for a 3D printer for anyone to make?
Yes it's in the video description box
You should have left more space for intake
What's this program drawing on desktop ?
I used sketchup
It looks cool but that's about it. Why thrust vectoring on a land based vehicle? Just added weight. The motor looked way too small for the size of the fan. I wouldn't trust a 3D printed fan unless you want to be scale Pratt and Whitney engine that can throw blades. More interesting if it is for an airplane.
Didn't see the follow-up video on this in any of your vids (did I not see it?). Didn't work out? Not spec'ing the thrust, etc. Your blisk design looks a bit sketchy for getting thrust from a motor (pretty is pretty, but functional is where the performance is).. but nice design overall. Too bad it didn't work out.
Memang mantap 👍👍 👍
10:58
changing the exhaust opening is NOT thrust vectoring!, thrust vectoring is the abllity to change the output of thrust NOT parallel to the exhaust output
jet engine requires jet fuel, this is but a fancy fan...
No, a jet engine is required to produce a jet (high velocity stream of gas or liquid), you afte taking specifically of a turbine jet. The jet is the propulsion, the turbine is how it is produced. I've never turbine fuel in a jet ski, yet it produces jet propulsion also. A jet can be produced by anything that soins a ducted fan at high speed. That's all a turbine is, a ducted fan with a burner and turbine to power it.
I'm afraid that's an EDF
So nice I want to buy it
you put it on a car but you dont see it working with the car
Add subtitles to the video please
uau e muito legal
Bah, that battery is good to go
This is an Electric Ducted Fan... EDF. NOT a Jet engine.
An EDF with a adjustable tail cone is NOT a jet engine with vectored thrust. Nice job though!!!
No, it's a jet with an adjustable tailcone.
Make a rc plane that uses these or a blimp
hola muy buenas noches tu tienes una impresora en 3d me podrias crear una turbina de un b757 -200 amodelo escala 1:200 / 1:400 y una aleta de lado izquierda del mismo modelo es aviones a escala armable rebell
انت وين ساكن بالعراق بأي محافظة؟؟
اربيل
@@scaleaddiction تمنيتك تكون في بغداد حتى اتشرف بلقاء حضرتك
موفق ان شاء الله
this is not thrust vectoring all you have is a variable thrust output
Show de bola meu querido.............brazil
Can this machine use to crush mosqitoes and corona virus in air
Not a jet engine but an electric ducted fan.
An EDF which produces a jet (a high velocity stream of gas or liquid). A turbine linked to a ducted fan is called a turbojet (for the turbine powering the fan and for the jet the fan produces). An edf is the same thing powered by an electric motor. They are both jets, as that is the propulsion they produce.
its an EDF. Not a jet engine. No chemical combustion, so its not a jet engine. Also that is not thrust vectoring. Thats just making the exhaust smaller (less efficient).I guess you could add thrust vectoring for your EDF in software.
But still nice work.
jet engine
[jet ˈenjən]
NOUN
an engine using jet propulsion for forward thrust, mainly used for aircraft.
jet
[jet]
NOUN
a rapid stream of liquid or gas forced out of a small opening.
engine
[ˈenjən]
NOUN
a machine with moving parts that converts power into motion.
In every way, this is a JET ENGINE!
You have bought into a misconception, that you believe is a fact, that simply isn't. A turbojet engine is what you are describing, it is only ONE type of jet engine, just like this is.
Its a edf not a jet engine and also not thrust vectoring
Clearly it did not work since you never made a follow up!
Hi
I think the combustion in the engine might cause your 3d printed parts to catch fire
Super design but your concept is fundamentally flawed as if anything it’s an EDF not a jet engine. You can’t claim that it’s a model of a jet engine either since it’s only a casing, nozzle and main fan disk. It a very nice looking but inefficient EDF, I mean your fan is glued to the shaft!! I love the ingenuity of the vectored thrust design, to work effectively in a real application it would have to be located further downstream but you concept exhibits nice out the box thinking which ultimately leads to innovation but this one has a long way to go.
jet engine
[jet ˈenjən]
NOUN
an engine using jet propulsion for forward thrust, mainly used for aircraft.
jet
[jet]
NOUN
a rapid stream of liquid or gas forced out of a small opening.
engine
[ˈenjən]
NOUN
a machine with moving parts that converts power into motion.
In every way, this is a JET ENGINE!
You have bought into a misconception, that you believe is a fact, that simply isn't. A turbojet engine is what you are describing, it is only ONE type of jet engine, just like this is.
@@shelbyseelbach9568 what I bought into was a ton of study materials, lecturers and hours of study, not to mention thousands of hours working in the field. In aeronautics, a jet engine is exclusively an engine that utilizes compression and combustion to produce thrust, pulsejets, ramjets, scramjets and any unconventional variation of the original jet engine, turbojet, UHB, HB all compress and combust air in one way or another exhausting it to produce thrust. There is a completely separate technology presumptuously called a 'fanjet', which like the electric ducted fan or ducted fan utilizes a ducted fan for thrust, sometimes compressing the air through a narrowing nozzle but devoid of any type of combustion, not commonly found in aviation but frequently found in model aeronautics. What many developers and manufacturers and even hobbyists experimenting with DF's and EDFs have found is that modern jet engine fan designs are not suitable for the high rpm ducted fans, I could get into the science of ducted fans and why that is but suffice it to say it is a completely separate technology from jet engines and what this guy has produced, albeit very nicely produced is a good looking EDF that will not be as efficient as one designed purely for the application because he based it on the aesthetic of a jet engine. This is a tired discussion found on many hundreds of YT videos and modelling forums
@@wingnutzster Exactly, all of that has led you to believe that this is not a jet engine, in spite of the facts presented. Once again, this meets all the requirements of a jet engine, he never said turbojet, he never said scramjet, he never said pulse jet, he never said ram jet. You'll notice that all in of these jet thrust producing motors, the word jet is accompanied by its power source to name them. This is because they are all jets, just like this one is. I understand what you think a jet motor has to be, you are simply wrong in the thought, that's all. A common misconception.
The coolest part about the whole thing is it doesn't even matter if you agree. Agreeing is not required to be wrong, in fact, they almost never go together.
@@shelbyseelbach9568 Semantics, if a guy claims that he built a jet engine and proceeds to produce something that in almost every way at least externally represents a small Williams or P&W on popular media he is most likely not describing a 'jet' according to Newton's law, that's a given, it is smart alec to then come along and claim 'well even a water jet is a jet' because that is not what he is illustrating. Technically and professionally speaking what he has produced is an inefficient ducted fan engine - by your thinking, are we to call a rapidly deflating balloon a 'jet engine'? We don't called ducted fan's 'jet engines' in the same way we don't call birds 'avians'. The proper term for what the laypeople call 'jet engines' is turbines, yes and that defines it more accurately but what was proposed here was a working scaled jet engine in the layman's sense.
@@shelbyseelbach9568 the same can be argued about his claim of 'vectored thrust' - what he created was a variable nozzle and not what is generally referred to as vectored thrust but one could be a smart alec and say theoretically the thrust is still being vectored and thus he is correct...when he isn't.
not bad you can do it better with the equipment you have
❤️❤️❤️❤️🇩🇰
I watched the full video and you are not gonna Teste it. What a wase of time.. I very sure it doesn't works.... 👎👎👎👎👎
Like you
Зачем,???
You just throw your money for no thing ...you thank that is turbofan !!!!!?????
Plohig. ಜಾಕೆಟ್ ge. Balisi.
Nice try but too bad the title is full of fraud.
Not a jet engine.
jet engine
[jet ˈenjən]
NOUN
an engine using jet propulsion for forward thrust, mainly used for aircraft.
jet
[jet]
NOUN
a rapid stream of liquid or gas forced out of a small opening.
engine
[ˈenjən]
NOUN
a machine with moving parts that converts power into motion.
In every way, this is a JET ENGINE!
You have bought into a misconception, that you believe is a fact, that simply isn't. A turbojet engine is what you are describing, it is only ONE type of jet engine, just like this is.
Bad work
Not a jet engine, not even a model jet engine, its a ported fan. Shoddy masking, runs everywhere. Ludicrously under-specified motor mount, printed in PLA (Motors get hot)...
Made me laugh my tits off, but you dont get a like and I wouldnt subscribe for that if you paid me. You need to level up your skills dude, sorry but there it is.
Lol I made u write all that?, wow, can u do something like this ?
@@scaleaddiction You dont know who I am, do you lol. Thats fine by me, but I'm reputed to be the most skilled man on the planet. Designer, photorealist artist, multi-instrument musician, genius mathematician, programmer and hardware engineer. I dont have a channel because my voice would be lost among the wannabes unless I whored myself, and frankly I'm a disabilities carer and activist, not a celebrity.
And, yes I can, my friend. In wood, metal, cardboard, polystyrene and virtual without using proprietary software besides a 3D printer. hackaday.io/Jez.Boxall Take care, and please, just put a little more effort into your finished project because it comes across as careless clickbait if you dont iterate or polish your work.
Sorry you caught me in a bad mood ;-)
jet engine
[jet ˈenjən]
NOUN
an engine using jet propulsion for forward thrust, mainly used for aircraft.
jet
[jet]
NOUN
a rapid stream of liquid or gas forced out of a small opening.
engine
[ˈenjən]
NOUN
a machine with moving parts that converts power into motion.
In every way, this is a JET ENGINE!
You have bought into a misconception, that you believe is a fact, that simply isn't. A turbojet engine is what you are describing, it is only ONE type of jet engine, just like this is.
@@shelbyseelbach9568 By your definition then, it is a poorly designed and badly executed model jet engine. Really, at this point I'm not sure who you are trolling - me, OP or yourself.
@@OriginalMorningStar Never said it wasn't. I'm not trolling anybody.