70 million is not a waste, there will always be losses in scientific progress. It not finding anything puts us further on the right track. It shouldn't be perceived as a bad venture.
It is a waste. Especially if it was funded by gov't money that means it was tax dollars taken out of someone's earnings that could've been put to better use. Like a person feeding their own kids.
@@gnryushi This money was used to pay scientists, pay technicians pay the truck drivers that moved the equipment, pay a billion different things. There's is absolutely no such thing as "wasted money" on an experiment, unless we're talking about corruption. Wasted is the money that ends up in the pocket of a single person and doesn't circulate in the market anymore.
Economics is an interesting topic that will say the exact opposite of what you said. Opportunity cost alone would say that this venture is only going to take away from the other technologies that we can build to figure this out for us. It doesn't matter who is fitting the bill, what matters is how does it help us advance and grow wealthier. NASA needs to pay its employees, and countries need to be able to support their people.
No. It's not a fluid - Just to clear up any misconception in anyone's minds. We are not about to find Species 8472 and Electric Universe theory is stupid. It might act like a fluid in a similar way as air is also a fluid (But for different reasons) - But so do most large masses of anything in the universe.
Thanks for the insight Anton, and to those of you with negative comments below, If you don't actually have the answer then don't give Anton a hard time. He didn't say he had the answer. He's just passing on the information. Lets see where this takes us.
@Donald Kasper you dont seem to grasp the actual research around what you are saying. in short - you are high on something and havent done the research. there is a ton of proof and actual evidence of what you are questioning. you just dont know it.
It's amazing how obvious it is ! Thanks Anton ! So good to feel ourselves out of the "RUclips way of doing" not to say "way of begging". You're passionate, and that's the thing !
@@elodens4 That's a valid point. But if the US govt would allow NGT's suggestion of increasing from 0.5% of the budget to 1%. Then the dark matter spendings would not seem so drastic.
@@bazpearce9993 Yes, a few hundred million really isn't very much, but that isn't the cumulative total. The issue of waste is interesting in this case with re: to how simple the solution to dark energy/matter could actually end up being. Because it's not like the idea of negative gravitational mass wasn't known as a possible avenue to explore. The other thing to keep in mind in all this is how to get the public onboard with future science funding. I'm not sure that the hunt for dark matter lends to a perception that prior dollars have been well spent...
Want funding than create Utility/Value. It's that cut and dry. Spitballing unfocused research with no clear end goal doesn't produce shit 99.9% of the time.
@@elodens4 But how many of these other experiments are even valuable enough to answer with that amount of money? Even if they don't find dark matter at all it's still a great contribution since most our mathematical theories would change (atleast the ones that have been telling us dark matter should be there)
If attractive Gravity is caused by matter interacting with a higher dimensional field, why can't something with the opposite effect be true considering all the naturally opposing particles we have observed?
This train of thought is actually what some physicists employed in the mid 20th century, when they tried to come up with a unified theory for electromagnetism and gravity.
@MyricalLyrical Nice appeal to authority fallacy you got going there. If washing your hands before surgery prevent infection then why did all the top surgeons refuse to wash their hands and dismiss the very notion as ridiculous?
look up the Electric Univere theory, it's very discredited but I'm convinced they're onto something (it has more predictive power than the current model lately)
@@Leispada but you need materialism for capitalism to work, something needs to be exploited. US exploits oil. Then again you need to exploit something in comm/socialism, only difference is they exploit it's people to work
@@deathbydeviceable Monasteries, worker coops, and some small businesses are communist in nature, as was the peasantry before feudalism... and quite honestly, families can be a little communist in nature, especially extended family units, though you don't see those in our more atomized, industrial societies. Certainly not all are/were great places to be: some small businesses, worker coops, and families can get rather dramatic in interpersonal relationships, monasteries can be inhabited by misanthropic recluses or run by cult leaders, and the peasantry ultimately could not fend off the rising feudal empires and protect the common lands from the bandits who would become the early militias. But I wouldn't argue that any are inherently exploitative. I think what's really exploitative is imperialism and elitism. The large scale communist movements saw little success in the face of efforts to break them up by the industrial titans they opposed, and gave in to a sort of misanthropic view of the working class they were beholden to, and so power in these movements was concentrated into the hands of a small number of leaders. In other words, they became imperialist. I would argue that Capitalism is *inherently* imperialist, as it favors the establishment of a wealthy class, who will inevitably fund a military caste of some kind to protect their wealth, and true or not, that has certainly been the precedent set by history. I think whatever the case is, though, that the primary enemy of humanity is a some abstract ideology concerned with intangibles like market forces, but our human tendency towards misanthropy. Any political movement, if it is to be truly freeing, must be one that does not give in to cynicism.
@@Leispada Exactly. If capitalists are materialist, then communism is capitalist. Most communists are materialist. Materialism is the concern with what actually happens over intangible ideals. In that way, materialism is not so much opposed to spiritualism as it is to idealism in general. Marx took Hegel's idealist dialectic method and made it materialist. Hegel asserted that lifestyle, the material, was inspired by ideology, the ideal. Essentially, that we decide, based on out values, how we make our way in the world. Marx reversed this formula, saying that rather, we form our values to justify to justify the sacrifices we make to survive. In other words, our ideology, the ideal, follows after lifestyle, the material. This notion served as a not entirely insignificant part of the bedrock of communism.
I just flipped through the paper rather quickly and I can say this is the most compelling theory I’ve ever heard for dark energy, and it has completely made me reevaluate my position on the “Big Crunch” theory. This is mind blowing, and I really think Farnes’ theory makes the most sense by a long shot.
Gotta keep those mug heads from comin' over the hill, jack! Science is nice, but worthless when you're at the end of the muzzle with jimmys jumping out of the trees.
Let's all - and I'm going out on a limb here - develop as a species and learn to get along.... Yeah, seems like a great plan. (don't read in sarcastic voice)
@@SoochiGaming No, he's right. The Alcubierre warp drive requires negative mass. I'm not sure what else it requires, or how much negative mass, but mathmatically, it definitely requires some negative mass.
Interesting! That answers my question pretty well from one of my previous comments. It WAS anti-gravity! But anti-gravity doesn't seem to work the way that I would have assumed that it would. It does make a lot of sense though, the second force should have its mirror! The oil analogy is almost perfect, but its missing something.. Because oil does repel water by its nature, so it just sits on top. Hydrophobic lipids and all. But this seems like it acts more like two cohesive fluids, occupying the same general space as its counterpart without either effecting the other in any extreme way. Rather serving to bind each other in place to an extent. I also think that using only acceleration and the force of gravity as the qualifiers for the interaction of the particles is a mistake. Yes, they are moving in the same direction, but at the same time they're repelled from collapse. So there must be another force involved. Its like the vacuum of space creates a constant tension that's difficult to overcome without much energy. Very similar to the way that I imagine electron clouds exist around atoms, but slowed down by 1,000,000,000% I find it very difficult to believe that negative mass is generated out of nothingness. Mass-energy equivalency should work the same on dark particles as it does on visible ones. I'd wager that there's a sort of balancing act with the amount of matter (both types), such that when two opposite particles meet they are obliterated. Then, in that vacuum of energy, an equivalent amount of mass is re-distributed into the fabric of the universe. So in a way, saying that the universe has a way of generating dark matter from nothing isn't wrong, but the same applies to normal matter in that situation. Seems to be, we're just missing a variable. There's got to be a pressure that prevents the immediate collapse of the universe and maintains balance between the two to a degree. Thank you so much for making such thought-provoking videos Anton! Much appreciated :D
@@trelligan42how about 1/6 the cost of a single aircraft carrier and in return, a much improved understanding of the universe and not to mention all of the technological advancements that will trickle down and become luxuries that we all take for granted.
Mr. Petrov, your videos are always informative and I appreciate that you provide links to the papers that you reference. I absolutely love the visual representation provided by this particular scientist. It certainly does seem to create something that is representative of our universe. Very exciting stuff! Keep up the great work.
Anton to date I think this is the most promising idea. As you were presenting the video I was already thinking in terms negative mass and it's interaction with itself and with positive mass using simple universal gravitational law. Finally never feel regrets. All work is step in the right direction. Failures finally point us the right direction.
Please keep us updated, wonderful Anton. You can delve into a few facets of the source paper in more depth for another video and we'll be happy. Perhaps explain some of the predictions like CMB looking different because sound waves in the early plasma would be different. Also some of the implications that would be lovely: such as breaking the Hubble Constant puts us in a cyclic universe (of maybe only ~105 billion years) because the negative curvature will make things collapse. I think you're good at simplifying things so go deep as you like.
If that's the answer I would really find it amazing, marvellous, wonderful! Such a simple sollution for a mind-boggling problem that has been around for a few decades.
All this has already been done and proved by a french scientist called Jean Pierre Petit since more than 20 years but no scientists wanted to take care of his works...this is not new at all!!
This is very exciting! By far the best possible description and explanation I have ever heard or read on the subject of dark matter. So, I am looking forward in seeing how it all plays out, and with great hope that Dr. Farnes' theory is correct and is eventually accepted by the scientific community. @Anton Nicely done on your presentation, "as usual". It's why I keep coming back for more.
I had proposed about 2 yrs ago that what we can detect as baryonic matter/energy is one kind of energy and dark energy is another kind of energy, incompatible like oil and water. And like oil in water, oil tends to clump together and will move toward each other and even merge much like galaxies and black hole mergers. The dark matter measured is just the tension that keep oil and water apart so that even if an oil drop were to spin super fast, it would still stay together, like galaxies spinning faster than their gravity holding them together. The oil and water is just an analogy, since they are both made from same energy form, while my 2 proposed energies are not just different forms of same energy but completely different energies. They dont interact with each other in any way, no friction, no exchange of energy, not even gravitational energy. They are just incompatible (at the macro level, however, they may somewhat interact at the quantum level). Since we are made up of only one energy, live only in one energy form, we cannot detect the other energy form(s). I know it is so much like introducing a god complex to explain the unexplainable, lol. But then I am not an accredited scientist.
Probably not warp drive or anything stupid like "if you drop a negative mass then it tries to piledrive into the Earth even faster when it collides" as some people seem to think.
I've just read a little bit about it on the book We have no idea, by Jorge Cham and Daniel Whiteson. I'm on the page 247 and in that chapter they explain what we've known about this subject so far. I really recommend this book for you guys!
@@melody3741 this is a lie. They get ad revenue just from the ad being viewed. Even if its skipped they get recieve ad revenue. They just have to be recieving $100 or more for them to actually collect any money from it.
Just when we thought we had it all figured out and then someone discovers that the Big Bang expansion is actually accelerating. LoL! It's like someone keeps moving the finishing line further away.
So where there is no mass, there is the lack of mass, and in the lack of mass, there are electrons. So electrons are negative mass, yes? I mean, electricity is not physical, but it affects physical. We can see light from electricity, so that proves that it is the hand of God or the hand of Consciousness, which is said to be surrounded by a ring of angels (loving light, or pure positive energy). Much like the universe. It is just thought energy affecting the development and evolution of the physical universe mirror reflecting the creation of the thought energy?
@@twintwix123456789 'thought energy' is electricity. Ain't that how brain cells and synapses work? (I'm no expert as you can see). What if mass is positive charge and antimatter (dark matter, dark energy, dark force if they want to add it...) is negative charge. All in the same medium, with current of energy going from pole to pole in many ways at many scales. If interested, look up the Thunderbolts Project (maybe youtube got you there already, sounds like you'd like it) Also, have you noticed that a brain map of the connections looks very similar to a connection map of the universe? (I'm not sure what the 'connection' here was, but I could look it up) Goes well with your theologic interpretation, which I don't share but I do find interesting.
@@Yarblocosifilitico Every thought that you think, has an energetic relationship with your own greater knowing of your own greater non-physical consciousness, that can be defined as emotion. Mind working together with the emotion, is how knowledge is achieved.
I see it more as a 3 dimensional matrix like unbaked bread dough that the conditions of this universe enable to rise and bake... expanding in all directions simultaneously and that ordinary Positive Matter is like raisins in that dough. The dough expands exponentially compared to the raisins, which hardly expand at all but are carried along with the expanding dough away from other raisins in the dough. A good loaf of raisin bread rises and bakes uniformly throughout, but it takes skill and good baking instructions to achieve this. If the oven is too hot, then the moisture in the dough expands and rises non-uniformly leaving bubbles and voids in the bread. If the oven is not hot enough, then parts of the loaf are left doughy and uncooked. So the field conditions of our universe may be such that the conditions that led to a uniform, well baked, award winning loaf of raisin bread led to the evolution of life and us so we can contemplate the recipe and temperature and duration of the baking time, but it is not the only way a loaf can be mixed and baked and there might be parallel universes where these non-perfect conditions exist. Maybe this multi-versal meta-matrix is the basis of the "Dark Matter" monopolar magnetic-like repulsive field that our Positive Matter/Dark Matter recipe is encased within ?
So, if Dark Matter is a repulsive force-effect kind of matter, then is it separate from Dark Energy really ? Is it like Dark Matter is the Neodymium Magnet and the Dark Energy is the strong magnetic field it has ? It's been something I've been a proponent of for about 20 years now that in order to determine the extreme aspects of gravity and now in this case repulsive effects (possibly) of Dark Matter, then a very precise observation and analysis of the redshifts and direction of such redshifts at the boundaries of voids and matter filaments of the cosmic web evident throughout the large-scale universe could be done. Originally I wondered if that investigation would help determine if Dark Energy was to Gravity, what Redshift was to Light. i.e. if light was so far away that it's redshift was so downshifted that a fantastically distant galaxy's photons could not ever reach us due to the hard limit on the speed of light. I wondered if Gravity was indeed mediated by a particle, the graviton, that, like the photon could not exceed the speed of light and therefore a fantastically distant galaxy's gravitons could not reach us so in effect eventually loose it's attractive property with our nearby galactic masses' gravitons and that was what was responsible for the seemingly increase in the universe's expansion rate... when all matter was close enough in the first few billions of years since the Big Bang all the matter's gravitons interacted normally, but when the expansion's redshift exceeded the "speed of gravity" then that attractive property immediately diminished with the square of distance and the apparent force of Dark Energy began to dominate. I wondered if examining behavior of matter's redshift at the very distant peripheries of inter-galactic superclusters and voids could help determine if gravity did behave the exact same way over there as it did here locally ? And again it is extremely fine observation needed just like what was discerned from the COBE and WMAP probe's data.
Hi Mr. Petrov, My Theory of Everything I have been waiting for nearly fifty years for someone to come to the realization of how the universe works. I first tried to explain it to my grade seven teacher to no avail. He simply could not grasp the concept. It was not his fault. He as many or possibly all suffer from the misnomer that the product of the “big bang” event is the universe. In fact, this explosive event happened within the universe. I have always been mystified as to why our most brilliant minds would say that the universe could be infinite while claiming that it is about thirteen and a half billion years old. I do not fault these great minds when it comes to understanding infinite. The question is if you can put a measurement on the duration it has existed, why refer to it as infinite? The universe may be infinite but not the “big bang” event. I could sum it up by quoting, “for whatever there is a beginning to there is also an end!” First, let us examine what current science claims. A couple of seconds prior to the “big bang” is unknowable to us since there was no time or space. Our science breaks down. Simply no physics and yet in the same breath it is asserted that there was a singularity! We must ask a simple question. Through what processes does a singularity form? Well from our current thinking and understanding, it is gravity. Thanks to Mr. Newton’s observations and math calculations, gravity is proportional to mass. Therefore, to have gravity there must have been mass, prior to the “big bang!” We can measure mass and the effects of gravity since ours like most other galaxies has a massive black hole and singularity at its center. It would appear that our physics does not break down prior to the previously mentioned “big bang” event. Our science would seem to be constantly contradicting itself or perhaps it is just a case of “the forest cannot be seen for the trees!” Humankind believes that if he were not there to hear the tree fall it is questionable as to whether it made a sound. I put this philosophical question in the same category as, how many angels can dance on the head of a pin and file it under irrelevant and foolish! Of course, it made a sound, just like space and time already existed before the “big bang” even though human beings were not around to measure them. It is a good thing that human beings exist or the explosive event known as the “big bang” indeed the universe’s existence would seem to be questionable. Dark matter is the building blocks of visible matter. After an immeasurable time, the measurable aspects of matter and interaction breaks down due to the vast distances between even the smallest particles. It is the remnants and ashes of the explosion, fine soot. All that is matter and of course energy is subject to entropy and dissolution as it spreads out in all directions from the source. We know that the explosion was not even in all directions, so the vast clouds of dark matter floated around the universe until eventually, they encountered other clouds of dark matter. After periods that are immeasurable, vast amounts of dark matter began to coalesce until eventually the process, due to gravity, began to gain momentum. The amount of time is anybody’s guess since humankind was not there to measure it; possibly, it took countless trillions of years to become the initial beginnings of a singularity. This bourgeoning singularity continued gravitationally attracting more and more dark matter, including at some point dark energy to it. The speed at which the singularity was absorbing dark matter and dark energy became too much for the singularity to adjust to, a tipping point, the result was a “big bang!” like a baby that takes too much milk too quickly and needs to burp. The resulting matter that is created could not be stabilized until a thin dimensional wall was formed from the initial massive release of energy and separated what was left of the newly created matter and antimatter, arresting the annihilation effect. The missing antimatter that our science cannot seem to find is attached to that thin dimensional wall. Normal matter is on this side directly adjacent. This is what made the visible matter we know possible, as this action sufficiently stabilized its creation. The stabilization is the process of energy shared back and forth between the thin dimensional wall, matter, and antimatter, a process similar to Tesla’s alternating current. All of the visible matter that is detectable has the stabilizing antimatter directly juxtaposition across from it and vice a versa. I have taken notice that when I point my finger at the antimatter universe and say, “you are the antimatter universe,” that there seems to be a person pointing back at me making the same statement! As for the missing gravity or at least fifty percent of the total amount of it, is being shared with this mirrored reflection, and maybe at least partly responsible for balancing and stabilizing our visible matter. All of this has happened at least twice and may happen repeatedly, forever like a seemingly never-ending pulse. My dear friend, if the content of this paper seems simple and brief then I have accomplished at least part of my objective. As Mr. Einstein stated,” If you cannot explain it in simple terms, then you do not understand it yourself. By Rick Ethier
Anton, thank you for keeping your explanations available to those of us without a formal education. You have made the general concept of space accessible to me. I can’t thank you enough for the work you do. Godspeed.
'Can you tell what it is yet?' This is a refreshingly open minded video, bearing that in mind, galaxies are vast and the stars spread out, but at distance their light is more coherent and the distances could be mitigated. Consider that a galaxy is surrounded by stars in contrast to a planetary system, so without breaking any rules the attraction of a bracelet of bodies to one another would contract that bracelet or maintain its radius against a faster rotation period. How does the system accelerate up to super-rotation speed? That is another question.
maybe is an ocean-like medium with currents of matter and dark matter (or positive and negative charged fields if you wanna look at it from a different perspective)
So possibly, this negative mass matter would infinitely draw from the void, giving body to the zero-point energy theory? The implications of this are formidable!
@@i-evi-l So, the casimir effect would keep it from violating the second law of thermodynamics then? I was wondering how the theory would get around that minor detail...
I'd say that gets explained more by the Big Crunch or the Deep Freeze, especially since it's all uncharted territory. Stable, unoxidized matter basically circumvents the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Shrug. Same for Tantalum 180m isomer, and Bismuth. Quasi-stable elements.
I'm wondering if Anton misinterpreted something, because spontaneously generating negative-mass particles would be a huge departure from currently-accepted conservation of mass and energy, which is a MUCH bigger deal than "what if negative mass is actually a thing?"
It seems that there are many systems in the Universe that behave as matter floating in water, as the planets pulled by the Sun or protons pulled into a cell; or as just moving water as in the case of the Sun and the atmospheres of the planets... Maybe dark matter is Planck length Toroids in perfect symmetry, maybe what some call the vector equilibrium, where the Toroids in equilibrium don't produce or absorb vibrations of asymetrical Toroids but allows them to flow through like sound through water while allowing for things to be spaced apart yet connected vibrational. Maybe we are oceans floating in a single ocean, draining into that ocean as we are filled by that ocean.
It started when I noticed that my thoughts attract other thoughts of the same nature, negative or positive. When I noticed this I could see in my mind a black hole in space pulling out of that space a particular kind of energy that my thoughts had created an attraction for. Even though I think that I also believed at the time that black holes were the source of all Evil. I have come to find that the Universe tells many stories of the same theme so we can see that they are true because their similiarities are too complex to be coincidental. Like the electron transfer chain in our cells strips electrons and create a pressure gradient between the inner membrane and the outer which creates a current to power equipment, a pressure gradient of charge is Created between the ground and the clouds and produces a current as lightning and sprites and whatnot, the Sun heats the equator most greatly creating a current of rising air that falls at the poles, same as is found in the oceans above and below the Earth's Crust. Galaxies form as nodules in the currents of outer space just as neurons form in the currents of our minds. All currents create waves that push and distort their boundary into the next. These patterns are seen everywhere in all kinds of systems of organization and interaction, lines of ants and anthills, interstate highways and cities. We see the same thing everywhere because everything is one thing. Einstein said everything is relative and everything is energy but also said that he didn't believe in a personal God and also thanked the Universe for everything so as to be friends with it. Einstein's equation equates to everything divided by Energy is one thing. I think that a lot of Belief is beyond our ability to consistently express in words. I just can't imagine that Einstein didn't believe in a personal God because he acted as though he did.
@@imaginaryuniverse632 I thought he said, "god doesn't roll dice" I suppose it's not important to my relationship with god, but seems to be he at least considered god a possibility. ...or was that Einstein? I could be wrong
@@Inertia888 Yes Einstein told Heisenberg that God doesn't roll the dice. I just read someone commenting how Einstein said he didn't believe in a personal God but he acted as though he did. I think most of the greatest physicists believe in a Creator of the Universe.
Not exactly the same - that's the funny thing: positive masses attract, negative repel, and negative mass “chases after” positive which “runs away” from it. At 8:08 you can see that the forces' directions are opposite to the case of magnets. But because - to get the acceleration - you have to divide by mass, negative mass matter ends up moving against the force it's experiencing.
You say that dark matter would fall into gravity wells and stay there if it interacted normally with gravity, but that's not true. Because dark matter doesn't interact electromagnetically, it doesn't have any way to convert kinetic energy into heat (i.e. thermal photons, which are a manifestation of the electromagnetic force) to dissipate its kinetic energy. The only way dark matter particles could dissipate their kinetic energy would be through direct collisions with other particles that _do_ interact electromagnetically, and thus could receive energy from those collisions and then radiate it away as thermal photons. Most types of particles in the universe are "pointlike", meaning they have no physical cross-section, thus direct collisions are impossible and they can only interact with each other via the fundamental forces. Because dark matter doesn't interact with any other fundamental forces besides gravity, dark matter has no way to lose kinetic energy, and is doomed to swirl around gravity wells forever.
Awesome stuff! 😁👍 We'll see either they prove it or not. I'm sure if this does answer what it is, there will be a whole new set of questions afterwards. 🤔💭
If we can industrially increase the emergence rate of this substance, and make it emerge forcefully inside event horizons, then we may be literally be capable of blowing up black holes.
@@Khannea I watched a couple of his vids. Why would an advanced civilization blow up a black hole ? For energy purposes or just fun ? I'm genuinely curious to elaborate on our beloved Anton Petrov's comment section.
So if dark matter that has negative gravity and gravity and time are related doesn't that mean going backwards in time is possible with dark matter in this simulation?
I agree with Neil deGrasse Tyson, who said that we should call it Dark Gravity to explain the problem, as Dark Matter implies the solution. I've felt for a long time that it's a fairy dust theory.
That's correct on one level, dark matter is a placeholder name for something we don't understand yet just like anti matter and matter are group names used for things we understand to some extent. The names don't really matter but the things they represent well...
Paladin, I've often wondered if that's the case. If there's 5 times as much of it as regular matter then there should be quite a bit of it around us, here in our own solar system (at least that's what the odds are). I just feel we're not understanding gravity as well as we should.
@@joelombrdo to be fair, it shouldn't be very abundant in the the Solar System. I've seen estimates that claim that the amount of dark matter inside Neptune's orbit should be only about the mass of the Moon, which would probably be impossible to observe. But I would agree with your last point.
Dark matter might be a theory, but the effects it tries to describe are happening in the real world. If you manage to disprove dark matter, I'm pretty sure there's a nobel price in it for you.
@@liquidminds I would agree. Though I think one should prove it exists rather than prove it doesn't. Non-existence of something should be assumed by default, whereas existence requires evidence. That's a more logically coherent way of looking at things.
Hypothesis: The nature of the universe is more similar to boiling sugar. A point of nucleation in a ocean of matter was the "big bang". The expanding state change of space/time pushes back the "nothing" that is the ocean creating the universe. It expands faster as the forces of state change exceed the surrounding "nothing" (deep sea of matter). There is a very good chance that space time not only extends out but also collapses in creating space in multiple dimensions. This would suggest that the nature of the universe is like boiling sugar with bubbles expanding, collapsing and dark matter the sugar bubbles and strands being pushed back and yet sometimes pulling. Black holes would be areas where the matter has re-condensed possibly even creating new universes inside themselves. A roiling bubbling foam of dimensions.
There's theory which explains galaxy rotation curve without dark matter, it calls "Metric dynamics" by Russian scientist Sergei Siparov (or "Anisotropic geometrodynamics", which is expansion of special and general relativity theories), which states (from the second name) that our space is in fact anisotropic. It seem to also explain such unique things as Hercules-Corona Borealis Great Wall.
Sort of. It replaces a kind of matter we have been failing to detect for decades with a kind of matter we've haven't started looking for yet, it might be easy if we look in the right place. Also, the dark matter they were looking for only solved one of two problems, if they found it, dark energy would still be an unknown. This could explain both with a single particle. I have this nagging suspicion that it might have been anti-neutrons all along, and they never noticed the tiny anti-gravitational effect that one particle had on all the test equipment.
@@katrinal353 yeah but the problem is that we don't know what dark matter is. Thinking of dark matter as negative matter describes it perfectly, yet just like dark matter we don't know what negative matter is.
@@rolandshelley5165 Well, negative matter is matter with negative mass. My point is, it's more information than it was before. And you can prove the model is accurate, if it's proven that the math follows the observations. It's a step forward to a more complete model, and more ways towards new research. Nothing in science is some breaking new information that twists everything around. Everything is progressive work.
No. When scientists are told to ignore things because the holy lord Einstein said it was impossible, it's not about being simple, it's about challenging dogma.
@@positronundervolt4799 He never said it was impossible. The consensus at the time was that the Universe was static, so Einstein added a constant to keep it static. He never said anything about it being impossible.
This model starts off with a -ve/+ve base field... Liquid Crystal Space -- Bottom-Up Universe Thought Experiment.. Colloidal Crystal Multiverse Hex Lattice: cell +6, flux -6. Pulls 6 opposites to escape speed (C) in 1 cell radius Tunneling: stretched, faster than light front, light speed (C) or slower rear Tunneling cells form in sync extrons+holons that often annihilate to regular='empty' lattice Tunneling particles reform elsewhere. Their original space 'heals' as regular empty lattice Particles: Inflows repel. 6 equatorial and 2x3 polar flows (-6 if poles flow in, +6 if out) Extron: free extra cell compresses the lattice, pulls flux that repels as rays Holon: flux-rich lost cell hole stretches the lattice, pulls in cells that repel as rays Dipolons: extron + holon.. Diextron: +ve + -ve extron.. Diholon: +ve + -ve holon Tempons: Cellon: lattice chunk.. Fluxon: holes.. heal to extrons+holons and/or/then annihilate Moving extrons push cells that -ve flux space behind pulls in with an inertia-providing kick Particles are surrounded by pilot waves that can diffract, interfere and alter trajectory Dipolon / Antimatter: out of sync extron+holon. In sync annihilate and radiate excess flux Black Hole Universes / Recursive Conformity: Big Bang = black holes colliding and merging Gravity squeezes and syncs extrons+holons, charge flow stops at light speed. Annihilation A minimum cell size / max density / critical mass is likely.. Shell gravity cancels inside Level n +/- or other (joined) particle fields (+ free particles) feasible Mass: (number of) out of place lattice cells. Extrons, holon charge flow Gravity: quantum pull, universal squeeze. Centralised inflows, outflows usually join inflows Mass pulls flux pulls mass. Lattice vibes up to 1 cell radius and light speed effect matter Mass uses up flux so void cells repel more. Universes trap cells so gravity shrinks the lattice Dark Energy: black hole feeds, core shell annihilates, excess flux radiates, lattice expands Photon / Light / Time: relatively quantum.. particle vibes ripple charge outflows Moves between cells in a constant time (+ universe expansion) as denser lattice slows light Gravity shrinks and acceleration compresses the lattice so both absolutely slow light locally Units shrink too, acceleration slows kinetic processes so local vacuum light speed measures C Velocity stretches kinetic processes in time as they travel more to complete. Clocks slow Transverse waves concentrate charge flow mass to a point. 2D adds effective area Accompanying lattice compression pilot waves diffract in a slit. Overridden by detector fields The Standard Model: the possibilities are numerous. Some SM particles may be tempons
Wouldnt this mean countless more consequences? Is there also negative mass antimatter? Are there negative mass black holes (would that be a white hole?), did negative mass trigger/drive the big bag? Why doesnt the negative mass interact with normal mass or is invisible? If the universe expands, so that makes the positive energy of the universe larger, therefore negative mass pops out of existence all the time? Doesnt that mean, the universe isnt accelerating in its expansion (could be an illusion, of negative mass affected expansion differently back in time / was more concentrated).
Anton I've literally been trying been trying to understand what dark matter is and out of all the videos ive ever seen this one definitely just blew my mind now i understand finally what dark matter is thank you man !! Happy i subscribed a long time ago !
The singularity of the super massive black hole in the center of the galaxy creates a bubble between universes. That bubble pushes the nearby universes and creates a negetive mass effect there. Thats what we call dark energy. We cant see it because it not in our universe but we can feel it. Can i get a thumbs up?
CleanerBen if we work out how something can have less than 0 mass, wow, that would completely rewrite science! We can finally have our antigravity hover cars!
It’s almost like how mathematicians were when it came to taking the square root of negative numbers. They invented a way (by defining i = sqrt(-1)) and look at us today. I think a similar thing will happen with negative mass.
i knew it last night i was talking to friends about negative matter in the universe. then this video shows up in my feed. I genuinely have not seen this until today. I just had a massive boost in confidence, perhaps some other ideas are also accurate.
I know off topic but wasn't 70 million the amount of 💰 that Bruce Willi's character in the late 1990s movie "The Jackel" where he played a high top professional hit man. Wasn't $70M supposed to be his pay off if he was successful in pulling of that last hit job before he was instead stopped and killed at the end of the film?
It's a neat idea for sure, but then we are replacing one tiny unknown particle with a whole new hail Mary branch of physics... that is quite a gigantic leap to take.
I see what you're saying, but isn't that what physics did already with the LCDM notion of 27% of the universe being the Hail Mary of Dark Matter and 68% of the universe being Dark Energy ?
Not really, it's still an unknown tiny particle, it's just that they've been searching for the wrong thing - Weakly Interacting Massive Particles instead of Negative Mass Particles. I don't know for sure, but it sounds like this implies there is an anti-Higgs boson? Maybe they can recalibrate the LHC to look for that?
I think it's kind of like a 12 volt battery system. Like atoms have a positive and negative charge and atoms represent the positive charged and dark energy represents the negative charge. We just need to figure out how to tap into the negative charge and combine the two and we'll have it all figured out then. The end of fossil fuels as we know it. And we wouldn't stop talking about it, we'd do nothing but talk about it cuz we'd have so much to talk about then.
Do not do science video If you can't tolerate that millions of dollar were spent on dark matter, Go & join senate. Do you even know the 'value' of discovery, It's priceless!
There wasn't any discovery tho so your argument is fully mute, additionally we have limited resources to work with so we need to prioritize them, thus any large expense that doesn't lead to a net benefit is by definition a waste of resources.
@@spenner3529 "Hmm, I think we can make a hot, warm, glowing thing by rubbing these two sticks together.. but it's just a theory that it can even be made to begin with, so of course I shouldn't theorize on how to make it." ~The caveman who could've doomed humanity. In order to make a theory, you have to make sense of things. In order to make sense of things, you have to theorize. A 'theory' by the usual usage of the term is just something we haven't figured out for sure yet, and saying "It's just a theory" won't help you figure it out.
@@spenner3529 I never said I make theories. I'm saying you shouldn't criticize those who do just because they can't come up with a conclusion out if thin air, without any thought as to how it could work beforehand.
@Greg Moonen at least you have an open mind😁 I'm just saying that if your math says there should be a rock in front of you but you can't see a rock, maybe it's your math that is the problem, not the invisible rock. Beware of any intellectual that labels those who question them as crackpots. Sometimes the intellectual is misguided (Newton).
@Greg Moonen no. I did very well, thanks for your concern. Oh yeah, not only is the rock invisible but you can't touch it, taste it or smell it. But.... What da maths😂
Interesting. When Ben Rich of Lockheed Skunk-works was asked by an Engineer how does the propulsion system work? (referring to the craft that can take "ET" home) he asked "How does ESP work?" The Engineer answers in a guessing tone "All points in space and time are connected?" Ben answers "That's how it works." in the calamity of reporters shouting Ben tuns and adds "There was a mistake in the math."
@@TheSuperCoolMan122 Saying that something exists(at least in the way scientists talk of dark matter) is in itself defining it, thus claiming some sort of understanding. Dark matter and Dark energy are more properly defined as inserted variables into antiquated equations in order to make sense of astronomical observations. Instead of scientists talking about dark matter and dark energy as though they are accurate assumptions, the proper scientific approach would be to focus on the inconsistencies and similarities of models vs reality without naming and mathematically defining the thing which you do not actually understand... "Dark Matter" and "Dark energy" represent our misinterpretation of the interactions between what we call gravity and the electric weak and strong forces..
It might not exist as a matter that only interacts gravitationally, but it very much does exist as discrepancy between our understanding of physics and actual observations. Calling it Dark Matter is not an answer in any way, it's a label for an unsolved problem. We might as well call it "Invisible Pixie Dust", but "Dark Matter" sounds a bit more dignified.
Um. NO. Dark matter doesn't have negative mass. The entire REASON for proposing the existence of dark matter was to explain an apparent EXCESS of mass in galaxies beyond what could be seen. That's POSITIVE mass. It's outrageous enough to just propose negative mass as an explanation for ANYTHING, but it is self defeating to propose it as dark matter.
medexamtoolsdotcom No no no. They have the same (a) vectors just because fg is negative dosen’t mean they will just avoid eachother. And you really should say that im thinking you dont even have physics and say these things to make people angry.
MOND postulates that gravity is not constant, but varies over large distance. Scientists criticize it for lacking a theoretical basis, an explanation oh “how” and “why”. I read recently that more scientists are starting to believe that gravity is inconstant; you recently had a video about the Hubble Constant being inconstant. It strikes me that this approach appears to fit the facts better than conventional “dark matter” models, and provides the theoretical basis. I would appreciate your take on this idea.
Allow me to offer a simple idea to explain why negative mass doesn’t repulse itself and attracts itself instead but not so much regular matter. Gravity is explained as bending the fabric of space time. We often simulate this by showing a large object on a cloth and how it makes the cloth stretch and dip down. Well, if negative mass exists then it should have negative gravity. It would essentially be like putting an object on the opposite side of the cloth and stretching the cloth and dipping up. It would act the same as any other mass would in space just mirrored. When negative mass surrounds regular mass it would naturally repel the normal mass but at the same time would bind itself to the rest of the negative mass surrounding it.
1. How can force be the opposite direction to acceleration, force causes acceleration so they must by definition be in the same direction. 2. Dark matter is required, because we noticed there isn't enough visible mass to hold the universe together, therefore to fill the dark matter gap it must by definition attract, we invented the idea of dark matter because we need something that attracts like normal mass but is invisible/undetectable in all other ways, therefore the one single defining feature of dark matter is that it has positive mass, its the only thing we know for sure about it.
This may seem an unlikely theory....but is it theoretically possible that the reason we cannot detect dark matter or energy is because the source may actually be cracks in space where another, possibly anti-matter universe seeps through into our universe? Sort of like how water will seep into crevices where there are cracks in a foundation. That thought has been in my mind since I first heard of Dark matter. I'd appreciated your thoughts on this idea.
The bubble thumbnail is a great example. The bubbles (representing matter) and the spaces surrounding (represents space) I can try to understand the elasticity between matter and dark matter theory, but it’s more likely matter by nature drives to be as dense as possible. There is no such thing as negative matter.
What you need to understand is not finding something, is finding something. It can help to rule out possibilities and disprove theories. When you observe, seeing “nothing” is a result.
Do we know if there is a relation to the graviton? No, because we've neither found a fermion nor a boson that could explain dark matter and the gravition. It's possible that the graviton is a force-carrying particle inherent in interactions between fermions and gravitons like the photon that governs interactions of the electromagnetic force between electrons/positrons. This would be much easier without heading to "information entropy and entanglement" or even wormholes with a negative energy space-time torsion. If that is so then I would think that using photons and electrons are the way of the dinosaur in trying to map our universe. This uncertainty is attributed to the first rule in that our current instruments are lost at the event horizon of black holes and with non-electromagnetic force interacting matter within galaxies and throughout space. That would be the first clue since ,at the instant of the formation of a black hole, the structure seems to vanish almost entirely from the electromagnetic spectrum and release minimal hawking radiation as a consequence of the disturbance in the quantum field. Since our laws of conservation of mass and energy would be based on electromagnetic fields and baryonic matter, it may be that these laws would no longer work for black holes and dark matter. This futility of the photon would lead me to believe that all of this could be due to the Higgs field. Perhaps we do not know enough about the role of the Higgs field in systems with high amounts of immeasurable potential. This is all theoretical.
70 million is not a waste, there will always be losses in scientific progress. It not finding anything puts us further on the right track. It shouldn't be perceived as a bad venture.
That means all the test flights done to learn how to build and fly a plane were a waste of money.
You may have misread me Henry. I forgive you.
It is a waste. Especially if it was funded by gov't money that means it was tax dollars taken out of someone's earnings that could've been put to better use. Like a person feeding their own kids.
@@gnryushi This money was used to pay scientists, pay technicians pay the truck drivers that moved the equipment, pay a billion different things. There's is absolutely no such thing as "wasted money" on an experiment, unless we're talking about corruption. Wasted is the money that ends up in the pocket of a single person and doesn't circulate in the market anymore.
Economics is an interesting topic that will say the exact opposite of what you said. Opportunity cost alone would say that this venture is only going to take away from the other technologies that we can build to figure this out for us. It doesn't matter who is fitting the bill, what matters is how does it help us advance and grow wealthier. NASA needs to pay its employees, and countries need to be able to support their people.
So, darkmatter could be described as a negative mass "fluid"?
That makes calling spacecraft "Ships" make even more sense!
Aetherium
Great... The Double Dark Slit Matter Experiment... Peoples heads are about to blow clean off their shoulders....
>M
It should be called "space submarine".
No. It's not a fluid - Just to clear up any misconception in anyone's minds. We are not about to find Species 8472 and Electric Universe theory is stupid. It might act like a fluid in a similar way as air is also a fluid (But for different reasons) - But so do most large masses of anything in the universe.
wtf are you talking about. this isn't Star Trek, this is real life.
hello wonderful anton, this is person
hello anton person, this is wonderful
@Shapes hello wonderful roads, this is country
@@masterchef1174 Hello MasterChef 117, this is GORDON RAMSAY.
@@zatcharybelltucker735 oh shit
Hello wonderful person, this is road country
Thanks for the insight Anton, and to those of you with negative comments below, If you don't actually have the answer then don't give Anton a hard time. He didn't say he had the answer. He's just passing on the information. Lets see where this takes us.
He is lying between his teeth from his first video on !!!
@Donald Kasper you dont seem to grasp the actual research around what you are saying. in short - you are high on something and havent done the research. there is a ton of proof and actual evidence of what you are questioning. you just dont know it.
Don't be so hard on the people with negative comments... they probably don't have the mental capacity to understand any of it, and thus get bored ;P
Anton seems like such a nice person. I'm glad he's around 😆💜
He is a "wonderful person".
It's amazing how obvious it is ! Thanks Anton ! So good to feel ourselves out of the "RUclips way of doing" not to say "way of begging". You're passionate, and that's the thing !
Cheers🍻🍻🍻🍻for a wonderful person.
Met him in real life, he's a g
Compared to all that crazy military spending. A few hundred million on dark matter is peanuts.
The point was that it could have been spent on other scientific experiments.
@@elodens4 That's a valid point. But if the US govt would allow NGT's suggestion of increasing from 0.5% of the budget to 1%. Then the dark matter spendings would not seem so drastic.
@@bazpearce9993 Yes, a few hundred million really isn't very much, but that isn't the cumulative total. The issue of waste is interesting in this case with re: to how simple the solution to dark energy/matter could actually end up being. Because it's not like the idea of negative gravitational mass wasn't known as a possible avenue to explore.
The other thing to keep in mind in all this is how to get the public onboard with future science funding. I'm not sure that the hunt for dark matter lends to a perception that prior dollars have been well spent...
Want funding than create Utility/Value. It's that cut and dry. Spitballing unfocused research with no clear end goal doesn't produce shit 99.9% of the time.
@@elodens4 But how many of these other experiments are even valuable enough to answer with that amount of money? Even if they don't find dark matter at all it's still a great contribution since most our mathematical theories would change (atleast the ones that have been telling us dark matter should be there)
I almost didn’t open this video because the title looks like some Buzzfeed-esque clickbait lol
it is
esque
Jadin Andrews
Thank you
So then you have not watched Anton before..time to sub.
thanx 4 warning@@ahall9839
If attractive Gravity is caused by matter interacting with a higher dimensional field, why can't something with the opposite effect be true considering all the naturally opposing particles we have observed?
This train of thought is actually what some physicists employed in the mid 20th century, when they tried to come up with a unified theory for electromagnetism and gravity.
@MyricalLyrical Nice appeal to authority fallacy you got going there. If washing your hands before surgery prevent infection then why did all the top surgeons refuse to wash their hands and dismiss the very notion as ridiculous?
@@dailytact1370 Because they had gloves over their unwashed hands. XD
look up the Electric Univere theory, it's very discredited but I'm convinced they're onto something (it has more predictive power than the current model lately)
@@Skylancer727 no,ppl died
Several hundred million? Waste? What are you talking about. Have you seen the US national debt? Now that's astronomical.
Funny part is that like 2/3rds of the debt is between different branches of govt and the public.
@Adam N Capitalism is not Materialism, I believe. And he did say materialism
@@Leispada but you need materialism for capitalism to work, something needs to be exploited.
US exploits oil.
Then again you need to exploit something in comm/socialism, only difference is they exploit it's people to work
@@deathbydeviceable Monasteries, worker coops, and some small businesses are communist in nature, as was the peasantry before feudalism... and quite honestly, families can be a little communist in nature, especially extended family units, though you don't see those in our more atomized, industrial societies.
Certainly not all are/were great places to be: some small businesses, worker coops, and families can get rather dramatic in interpersonal relationships, monasteries can be inhabited by misanthropic recluses or run by cult leaders, and the peasantry ultimately could not fend off the rising feudal empires and protect the common lands from the bandits who would become the early militias. But I wouldn't argue that any are inherently exploitative. I think what's really exploitative is imperialism and elitism.
The large scale communist movements saw little success in the face of efforts to break them up by the industrial titans they opposed, and gave in to a sort of misanthropic view of the working class they were beholden to, and so power in these movements was concentrated into the hands of a small number of leaders. In other words, they became imperialist.
I would argue that Capitalism is *inherently* imperialist, as it favors the establishment of a wealthy class, who will inevitably fund a military caste of some kind to protect their wealth, and true or not, that has certainly been the precedent set by history.
I think whatever the case is, though, that the primary enemy of humanity is a some abstract ideology concerned with intangibles like market forces, but our human tendency towards misanthropy. Any political movement, if it is to be truly freeing, must be one that does not give in to cynicism.
@@Leispada Exactly. If capitalists are materialist, then communism is capitalist. Most communists are materialist. Materialism is the concern with what actually happens over intangible ideals. In that way, materialism is not so much opposed to spiritualism as it is to idealism in general.
Marx took Hegel's idealist dialectic method and made it materialist. Hegel asserted that lifestyle, the material, was inspired by ideology, the ideal. Essentially, that we decide, based on out values, how we make our way in the world.
Marx reversed this formula, saying that rather, we form our values to justify to justify the sacrifices we make to survive. In other words, our ideology, the ideal, follows after lifestyle, the material. This notion served as a not entirely insignificant part of the bedrock of communism.
I just flipped through the paper rather quickly and I can say this is the most compelling theory I’ve ever heard for dark energy, and it has completely made me reevaluate my position on the “Big Crunch” theory. This is mind blowing, and I really think Farnes’ theory makes the most sense by a long shot.
IiiCookieCookieCookieCooki
If he is right, he could win the next nobel physics prize.
and put us on the way towards real anti gravity...
@@the_astrokhan Imagine launching rockets without fuel...
@@David-zy1lr Launching rockets without fuel? Elon Musk is definitely going to be interested when he gets wind of this.
Well, it's not like we can start blasting anti matter out of the bottom of rockets. Anti gravity is more about magnetism than antimatter.
@Yeoss :3 What's so funny?
That means warp drive
I will settle for a hoverboard.
generate kugelblitz black holes in both positive and negative mass variants. tune the geometry, done.
Brake in to the Bulk, escape the end of the Universe!
Not with these currently energy prices m8 ;).
And wormholes and time travel.
Better spent on making cool science stuff than more wars and devastation.
Very true
Gotta keep those mug heads from comin' over the hill, jack!
Science is nice, but worthless when you're at the end of the muzzle with jimmys jumping out of the trees.
Let's all - and I'm going out on a limb here - develop as a species and learn to get along.... Yeah, seems like a great plan. (don't read in sarcastic voice)
@@jazz21977 And why don't lions just get along with gazelles and wolves get along with sheep?
Truly big brain thoughts
well , in a way , wars have pushed science forward , so yeah
isnt negative mass the missing ingredient to several "warp drives"???
negative energy used to stabilize worm holes i think thats what u mean
@@SoochiGaming No, he's right. The Alcubierre warp drive requires negative mass. I'm not sure what else it requires, or how much negative mass, but mathmatically, it definitely requires some negative mass.
@KRYMauL Mammals use negative pressure to suck air in, fwiw
@@teebow3369 like my gf does on me?
@@teebow3369 That would be negative relative pressure, they are talking about negative absolute pressure.
Interesting! That answers my question pretty well from one of my previous comments. It WAS anti-gravity! But anti-gravity doesn't seem to work the way that I would have assumed that it would. It does make a lot of sense though, the second force should have its mirror!
The oil analogy is almost perfect, but its missing something..
Because oil does repel water by its nature, so it just sits on top. Hydrophobic lipids and all.
But this seems like it acts more like two cohesive fluids, occupying the same general space as its counterpart without either effecting the other in any extreme way. Rather serving to bind each other in place to an extent.
I also think that using only acceleration and the force of gravity as the qualifiers for the interaction of the particles is a mistake. Yes, they are moving in the same direction, but at the same time they're repelled from collapse. So there must be another force involved. Its like the vacuum of space creates a constant tension that's difficult to overcome without much energy.
Very similar to the way that I imagine electron clouds exist around atoms, but slowed down by 1,000,000,000%
I find it very difficult to believe that negative mass is generated out of nothingness. Mass-energy equivalency should work the same on dark particles as it does on visible ones.
I'd wager that there's a sort of balancing act with the amount of matter (both types), such that when two opposite particles meet they are obliterated. Then, in that vacuum of energy, an equivalent amount of mass is re-distributed into the fabric of the universe.
So in a way, saying that the universe has a way of generating dark matter from nothing isn't wrong, but the same applies to normal matter in that situation.
Seems to be, we're just missing a variable. There's got to be a pressure that prevents the immediate collapse of the universe and maintains balance between the two to a degree.
Thank you so much for making such thought-provoking videos Anton! Much appreciated :D
Most well thought out comment here. Thank you
Take some haloperidol
" The force is made by all living things"
" It surrounds us, penetrates us, it's what binds the galaxy together."
70 million is not much if u compare the US military Budget
The cost of a single Joint Strike Fighter aircraft
712 Billion dollars a year lol
I wonder how many hundreds of millions the Square Kilometer Array will cost?
Terry Smithwick it doesn't matter what the square kilometre array costs, we need it.
@@trelligan42how about 1/6 the cost of a single aircraft carrier and in return, a much improved understanding of the universe and not to mention all of the technological advancements that will trickle down and become luxuries that we all take for granted.
“Constantly replenished” sounds suspiciously like Hoyle’s steady-state universe.
Mr. Petrov, your videos are always informative and I appreciate that you provide links to the papers that you reference. I absolutely love the visual representation provided by this particular scientist. It certainly does seem to create something that is representative of our universe. Very exciting stuff! Keep up the great work.
Anton to date I think this is the most promising idea. As you were presenting the video I was already thinking in terms negative mass and it's interaction with itself and with positive mass using simple universal gravitational law. Finally never feel regrets. All work is step in the right direction. Failures finally point us the right direction.
Please keep us updated, wonderful Anton. You can delve into a few facets of the source paper in more depth for another video and we'll be happy. Perhaps explain some of the predictions like CMB looking different because sound waves in the early plasma would be different. Also some of the implications that would be lovely: such as breaking the Hubble Constant puts us in a cyclic universe (of maybe only ~105 billion years) because the negative curvature will make things collapse. I think you're good at simplifying things so go deep as you like.
If that's the answer I would really find it amazing, marvellous, wonderful! Such a simple sollution for a mind-boggling problem that has been around for a few decades.
Wowza, if said Scientist is correct in his theories, he’s THE
‘Wonderful Person’! ✨
All this has already been done and proved by a french scientist called Jean Pierre Petit since more than 20 years but no scientists wanted to take care of his works...this is not new at all!!
This is very exciting! By far the best possible description and explanation I have ever heard or read on the subject of dark matter.
So, I am looking forward in seeing how it all plays out, and with great hope that Dr. Farnes' theory is correct and is eventually accepted by the scientific community.
@Anton Nicely done on your presentation, "as usual". It's why I keep coming back for more.
I had proposed about 2 yrs ago that what we can detect as baryonic matter/energy is one kind of energy and dark energy is another kind of energy, incompatible like oil and water.
And like oil in water, oil tends to clump together and will move toward each other and even merge much like galaxies and black hole mergers.
The dark matter measured is just the tension that keep oil and water apart so that even if an oil drop were to spin super fast, it would still stay together, like galaxies spinning faster than their gravity holding them together.
The oil and water is just an analogy, since they are both made from same energy form, while my 2 proposed energies are not just different forms of same energy but completely different energies. They dont interact with each other in any way, no friction, no exchange of energy, not even gravitational energy. They are just incompatible (at the macro level, however, they may somewhat interact at the quantum level).
Since we are made up of only one energy, live only in one energy form, we cannot detect the other energy form(s).
I know it is so much like introducing a god complex to explain the unexplainable, lol. But then I am not an accredited scientist.
I lost him after, "Hello wonderful person." :o)
wait wait wait, negative mass? does that mean anti-gravity and warp-drive might be possible? OMG 🤓🤓🤓
Element 115
Probably not warp drive or anything stupid like "if you drop a negative mass then it tries to piledrive into the Earth even faster when it collides" as some people seem to think.
Yes
@Y O J I M B O 用心棒 ?
Choco Account lol mhm yep
Pre-watching; this could be a big deal
I think this guy nail it, his explanation is so symetrical, elagant. Because his theory could also explain dark energy
Man I really appreciate the videos. Thank you
I've just read a little bit about it on the book We have no idea, by Jorge Cham and Daniel Whiteson. I'm on the page 247 and in that chapter they explain what we've known about this subject so far. I really recommend this book for you guys!
Noted on my book buy list. Thanks.
Got an ad and watched the whole thing for support. Amazing vids man
I did too. Any little bit to help a great channel.
You have to click or they dont get money.
@@melody3741 this is a lie. They get ad revenue just from the ad being viewed. Even if its skipped they get recieve ad revenue. They just have to be recieving $100 or more for them to actually collect any money from it.
Just when we thought we had it all figured out and then someone discovers that the Big Bang expansion is actually accelerating. LoL! It's like someone keeps moving the finishing line further away.
Whe never thought we all figured it out. LoL!
Love your channel dude keep up the good work
Liquid Universe is not new, there was a website dedicated to it but removed.
'Draw a little minus in the math'
That's what Maxwell did to electro(-)magnetism
So where there is no mass, there is the lack of mass, and in the lack of mass, there are electrons. So electrons are negative mass, yes? I mean, electricity is not physical, but it affects physical. We can see light from electricity, so that proves that it is the hand of God or the hand of Consciousness, which is said to be surrounded by a ring of angels (loving light, or pure positive energy).
Much like the universe. It is just thought energy affecting the development and evolution of the physical universe mirror reflecting the creation of the thought energy?
@@twintwix123456789 'thought energy' is electricity. Ain't that how brain cells and synapses work? (I'm no expert as you can see). What if mass is positive charge and antimatter (dark matter, dark energy, dark force if they want to add it...) is negative charge. All in the same medium, with current of energy going from pole to pole in many ways at many scales.
If interested, look up the Thunderbolts Project (maybe youtube got you there already, sounds like you'd like it)
Also, have you noticed that a brain map of the connections looks very similar to a connection map of the universe? (I'm not sure what the 'connection' here was, but I could look it up) Goes well with your theologic interpretation, which I don't share but I do find interesting.
@@Yarblocosifilitico Every thought that you think, has an energetic relationship with your own greater knowing of your own greater non-physical consciousness, that can be defined as emotion. Mind working together with the emotion, is how knowledge is achieved.
@@twintwix123456789 Definetely agree with the second sentence, not so sure about the first one, but I can relate to the idea
And just like matter, woowoo and bullshit clumps together.... In the deep areas of the coment section
So Dark Matter kinda works like cement ? Holding things together.
Cement doesn't move.
I see it more as a 3 dimensional matrix like unbaked bread dough that the conditions of this universe enable to rise and bake... expanding in all directions simultaneously and that ordinary Positive Matter is like raisins in that dough. The dough expands exponentially compared to the raisins, which hardly expand at all but are carried along with the expanding dough away from other raisins in the dough.
A good loaf of raisin bread rises and bakes uniformly throughout, but it takes skill and good baking instructions to achieve this. If the oven is too hot, then the moisture in the dough expands and rises non-uniformly leaving bubbles and voids in the bread. If the oven is not hot enough, then parts of the loaf are left doughy and uncooked. So the field conditions of our universe may be such that the conditions that led to a uniform, well baked, award winning loaf of raisin bread led to the evolution of life and us so we can contemplate the recipe and temperature and duration of the baking time, but it is not the only way a loaf can be mixed and baked and there might be parallel universes where these non-perfect conditions exist. Maybe this multi-versal meta-matrix is the basis of the "Dark Matter" monopolar magnetic-like repulsive field that our Positive Matter/Dark Matter recipe is encased within ?
So, if Dark Matter is a repulsive force-effect kind of matter, then is it separate from Dark Energy really ? Is it like Dark Matter is the Neodymium Magnet and the Dark Energy is the strong magnetic field it has ?
It's been something I've been a proponent of for about 20 years now that in order to determine the extreme aspects of gravity and now in this case repulsive effects (possibly) of Dark Matter, then a very precise observation and analysis of the redshifts and direction of such redshifts at the boundaries of voids and matter filaments of the cosmic web evident throughout the large-scale universe could be done.
Originally I wondered if that investigation would help determine if Dark Energy was to Gravity, what Redshift was to Light. i.e. if light was so far away that it's redshift was so downshifted that a fantastically distant galaxy's photons could not ever reach us due to the hard limit on the speed of light. I wondered if Gravity was indeed mediated by a particle, the graviton, that, like the photon could not exceed the speed of light and therefore a fantastically distant galaxy's gravitons could not reach us so in effect eventually loose it's attractive property with our nearby galactic masses' gravitons and that was what was responsible for the seemingly increase in the universe's expansion rate... when all matter was close enough in the first few billions of years since the Big Bang all the matter's gravitons interacted normally, but when the expansion's redshift exceeded the "speed of gravity" then that attractive property immediately diminished with the square of distance and the apparent force of Dark Energy began to dominate. I wondered if examining behavior of matter's redshift at the very distant peripheries of inter-galactic superclusters and voids could help determine if gravity did behave the exact same way over there as it did here locally ? And again it is extremely fine observation needed just like what was discerned from the COBE and WMAP probe's data.
Like flex tape
Imagine calking your bath tub with a black hole... I prefer mine lukewarm. I have an event horizon sensitivity...
>M
Hi Mr. Petrov, My Theory of Everything
I have been waiting for nearly fifty years for someone to come to the realization of how the universe works. I first tried to explain it to my grade seven teacher to no avail. He simply could not grasp the concept. It was not his fault. He as many or possibly all suffer from the misnomer that the product of the “big bang” event is the universe. In fact, this explosive event happened within the universe. I have always been mystified as to why our most brilliant minds would say that the universe could be infinite while claiming that it is about thirteen and a half billion years old. I do not fault these great minds when it comes to understanding infinite. The question is if you can put a measurement on the duration it has existed, why refer to it as infinite? The universe may be infinite but not the “big bang” event. I could sum it up by quoting, “for whatever there is a beginning to there is also an end!”
First, let us examine what current science claims. A couple of seconds prior to the “big bang” is unknowable to us since there was no time or space. Our science breaks down. Simply no physics and yet in the same breath it is asserted that there was a singularity! We must ask a simple question. Through what processes does a singularity form? Well from our current thinking and understanding, it is gravity. Thanks to Mr. Newton’s observations and math calculations, gravity is proportional to mass. Therefore, to have gravity there must have been mass, prior to the “big bang!” We can measure mass and the effects of gravity since ours like most other galaxies has a massive black hole and singularity at its center. It would appear that our physics does not break down prior to the previously mentioned “big bang” event.
Our science would seem to be constantly contradicting itself or perhaps it is just a case of “the forest cannot be seen for the trees!” Humankind believes that if he were not there to hear the tree fall it is questionable as to whether it made a sound. I put this philosophical question in the same category as, how many angels can dance on the head of a pin and file it under irrelevant and foolish! Of course, it made a sound, just like space and time already existed before the “big bang” even though human beings were not around to measure them. It is a good thing that human beings exist or the explosive event known as the “big bang” indeed the universe’s existence would seem to be questionable.
Dark matter is the building blocks of visible matter. After an immeasurable time, the measurable aspects of matter and interaction breaks down due to the vast distances between even the smallest particles. It is the remnants and ashes of the explosion, fine soot. All that is matter and of course energy is subject to entropy and dissolution as it spreads out in all directions from the source. We know that the explosion was not even in all directions, so the vast clouds of dark matter floated around the universe until eventually, they encountered other clouds of dark matter.
After periods that are immeasurable, vast amounts of dark matter began to coalesce until eventually the process, due to gravity, began to gain momentum. The amount of time is anybody’s guess since humankind was not there to measure it; possibly, it took countless trillions of years to become the initial beginnings of a singularity. This bourgeoning singularity continued gravitationally attracting more and more dark matter, including at some point dark energy to it. The speed at which the singularity was absorbing dark matter and dark energy became too much for the singularity to adjust to, a tipping point, the result was a “big bang!” like a baby that takes too much milk too quickly and needs to burp.
The resulting matter that is created could not be stabilized until a thin dimensional wall was formed from the initial massive release of energy and separated what was left of the newly created matter and antimatter, arresting the annihilation effect. The missing antimatter that our science cannot seem to find is attached to that thin dimensional wall. Normal matter is on this side directly adjacent. This is what made the visible matter we know possible, as this action sufficiently stabilized its creation. The stabilization is the process of energy shared back and forth between the thin dimensional wall, matter, and antimatter, a process similar to Tesla’s alternating current. All of the visible matter that is detectable has the stabilizing antimatter directly juxtaposition across from it and vice a versa. I have taken notice that when I point my finger at the antimatter universe and say, “you are the antimatter universe,” that there seems to be a person pointing back at me making the same statement! As for the missing gravity or at least fifty percent of the total amount of it, is being shared with this mirrored reflection, and maybe at least partly responsible for balancing and stabilizing our visible matter. All of this has happened at least twice and may happen repeatedly, forever like a seemingly never-ending pulse.
My dear friend, if the content of this paper seems simple and brief then I have accomplished at least part of my objective. As Mr. Einstein stated,” If you cannot explain it in simple terms, then you do not understand it yourself.
By
Rick Ethier
Rick Ethier do you have any maths to back up your assertion?
@@caedes5728 Sorry, I do not. I'm sure that it would be interesting though!
Rick Ethier, in that case I will stick to the people who have done the maths and experiments to back up what they say.
Anton, thank you for keeping your explanations available to those of us without a formal education. You have made the general concept of space accessible to me. I can’t thank you enough for the work you do. Godspeed.
'Can you tell what it is yet?' This is a refreshingly open minded video, bearing that in mind, galaxies are vast and the stars spread out, but at distance their light is more coherent and the distances could be mitigated. Consider that a galaxy is surrounded by stars in contrast to a planetary system, so without breaking any rules the attraction of a bracelet of bodies to one another would contract that bracelet or maintain its radius against a faster rotation period. How does the system accelerate up to super-rotation speed? That is another question.
Hi, Mr. Petrov. What if "Dark Energy" and "Dark Matter" are just the same thing and that is an intrinsic expansion of space-time?
That's what mine theory says
Maybe space is just repulsive to mass, and masses just shield each other from space-repulsion in a way that looks like gravitational attraction.
maybe is an ocean-like medium with currents of matter and dark matter (or positive and negative charged fields if you wanna look at it from a different perspective)
So possibly, this negative mass matter would infinitely draw from the void, giving body to the zero-point energy theory? The implications of this are formidable!
Casimir Effect.
@@i-evi-l So, the casimir effect would keep it from violating the second law of thermodynamics then?
I was wondering how the theory would get around that minor detail...
I'd say that gets explained more by the Big Crunch or the Deep Freeze, especially since it's all uncharted territory. Stable, unoxidized matter basically circumvents the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Shrug. Same for Tantalum 180m isomer, and Bismuth. Quasi-stable elements.
or nothing-burger.
I'm wondering if Anton misinterpreted something, because spontaneously generating negative-mass particles would be a huge departure from currently-accepted conservation of mass and energy, which is a MUCH bigger deal than "what if negative mass is actually a thing?"
So my mind gets blown from time to time by Petrov videos, but seeing Petrov with his mind blown is pretty amazing.
Hi Anton, you're doing a great job, all your videos are amazing and informative. Please stay positive.
Think dark energy is just tops of the gravitation fields. Like mass make dips in the gravitation fields,
yeah. . some how dark matter particles sound wrong. .
It seems that there are many systems in the Universe that behave as matter floating in water, as the planets pulled by the Sun or protons pulled into a cell; or as just moving water as in the case of the Sun and the atmospheres of the planets... Maybe dark matter is Planck length Toroids in perfect symmetry, maybe what some call the vector equilibrium, where the Toroids in equilibrium don't produce or absorb vibrations of asymetrical Toroids but allows them to flow through like sound through water while allowing for things to be spaced apart yet connected vibrational. Maybe we are oceans floating in a single ocean, draining into that ocean as we are filled by that ocean.
wow, where did you come up with that? it's beautiful
It started when I noticed that my thoughts attract other thoughts of the same nature, negative or positive. When I noticed this I could see in my mind a black hole in space pulling out of that space a particular kind of energy that my thoughts had created an attraction for. Even though I think that I also believed at the time that black holes were the source of all Evil. I have come to find that the Universe tells many stories of the same theme so we can see that they are true because their similiarities are too complex to be coincidental. Like the electron transfer chain in our cells strips electrons and create a pressure gradient between the inner membrane and the outer which creates a current to power equipment, a pressure gradient of charge is Created between the ground and the clouds and produces a current as lightning and sprites and whatnot, the Sun heats the equator most greatly creating a current of rising air that falls at the poles, same as is found in the oceans above and below the Earth's Crust. Galaxies form as nodules in the currents of outer space just as neurons form in the currents of our minds. All currents create waves that push and distort their boundary into the next. These patterns are seen everywhere in all kinds of systems of organization and interaction, lines of ants and anthills, interstate highways and cities.
We see the same thing everywhere because everything is one thing. Einstein said everything is relative and everything is energy but also said that he didn't believe in a personal God and also thanked the Universe for everything so as to be friends with it. Einstein's equation equates to everything divided by Energy is one thing. I think that a lot of Belief is beyond our ability to consistently express in words. I just can't imagine that Einstein didn't believe in a personal God because he acted as though he did.
@@imaginaryuniverse632 I thought he said, "god doesn't roll dice" I suppose it's not important to my relationship with god, but seems to be he at least considered god a possibility. ...or was that Einstein? I could be wrong
@@Inertia888 Yes Einstein told Heisenberg that God doesn't roll the dice. I just read someone commenting how Einstein said he didn't believe in a personal God but he acted as though he did. I think most of the greatest physicists believe in a Creator of the Universe.
In the same way as magnets, like poles repel, whereas mixed poles attract.
Not exactly the same - that's the funny thing: positive masses attract, negative repel, and negative mass “chases after” positive which “runs away” from it. At 8:08 you can see that the forces' directions are opposite to the case of magnets. But because - to get the acceleration - you have to divide by mass, negative mass matter ends up moving against the force it's experiencing.
You say that dark matter would fall into gravity wells and stay there if it interacted normally with gravity, but that's not true. Because dark matter doesn't interact electromagnetically, it doesn't have any way to convert kinetic energy into heat (i.e. thermal photons, which are a manifestation of the electromagnetic force) to dissipate its kinetic energy. The only way dark matter particles could dissipate their kinetic energy would be through direct collisions with other particles that _do_ interact electromagnetically, and thus could receive energy from those collisions and then radiate it away as thermal photons. Most types of particles in the universe are "pointlike", meaning they have no physical cross-section, thus direct collisions are impossible and they can only interact with each other via the fundamental forces. Because dark matter doesn't interact with any other fundamental forces besides gravity, dark matter has no way to lose kinetic energy, and is doomed to swirl around gravity wells forever.
Hello, Wonderful Anton! Thank you for all of your videos.
8:00 - Is it just me or does that look like it could be the building blocks for anti-gravity technology...?
Awesome stuff! 😁👍 We'll see either they prove it or not. I'm sure if this does answer what it is, there will be a whole new set of questions afterwards. 🤔💭
If we can industrially increase the emergence rate of this substance, and make it emerge forcefully inside event horizons, then we may be literally be capable of blowing up black holes.
Sounds like a great idea! What could possibly go wrong?
Why would you do that xD
@@Bertydude _Why would you do that xD_ People like to watch a good fireworks display don't they?
@@Bertydude - you so need to.go watch all of Isaac Arthur's videos
@@Khannea I watched a couple of his vids. Why would an advanced civilization blow up a black hole ? For energy purposes or just fun ? I'm genuinely curious to elaborate on our beloved Anton Petrov's comment section.
So if dark matter that has negative gravity and gravity and time are related doesn't that mean going backwards in time is possible with dark matter in this simulation?
Just subscribed...keep this type of enlightened knowledge flowing. Thank you.
The budget deficit and dark matter ...ARE THE SAME THING !!!!!!
Dark matter may not exist. It’s one solution to a problem in specific theory’s and associated math.
dark matter is quantized intent. dark energy is the effect of worshiping dark matter. all very vile
I agree with Neil deGrasse Tyson, who said that we should call it Dark Gravity to explain the problem, as Dark Matter implies the solution. I've felt for a long time that it's a fairy dust theory.
@@sandalthong4010 You are not qualified to make such assumptions.
@@patrickbrumm4120 You are not qualified to make such assumptions.
You are not qualified to make such assumptions.
Dark matter doesn't exist.
It's just an ad hoc hypothesis.
That's correct on one level, dark matter is a placeholder name for something we don't understand yet just like anti matter and matter are group names used for things we understand to some extent. The names don't really matter but the things they represent well...
Paladin, I've often wondered if that's the case. If there's 5 times as much of it as regular matter then there should be quite a bit of it around us, here in our own solar system (at least that's what the odds are). I just feel we're not understanding gravity as well as we should.
@@joelombrdo to be fair, it shouldn't be very abundant in the the Solar System.
I've seen estimates that claim that the amount of dark matter inside Neptune's orbit should be only about the mass of the Moon, which would probably be impossible to observe.
But I would agree with your last point.
Dark matter might be a theory, but the effects it tries to describe are happening in the real world.
If you manage to disprove dark matter, I'm pretty sure there's a nobel price in it for you.
@@liquidminds I would agree.
Though I think one should prove it exists rather than prove it doesn't. Non-existence of something should be assumed by default, whereas existence requires evidence. That's a more logically coherent way of looking at things.
Hypothesis: The nature of the universe is more similar to boiling sugar. A point of nucleation in a ocean of matter was the "big bang". The expanding state change of space/time pushes back the "nothing" that is the ocean creating the universe. It expands faster as the forces of state change exceed the surrounding "nothing" (deep sea of matter). There is a very good chance that space time not only extends out but also collapses in creating space in multiple dimensions. This would suggest that the nature of the universe is like boiling sugar with bubbles expanding, collapsing and dark matter the sugar bubbles and strands being pushed back and yet sometimes pulling. Black holes would be areas where the matter has re-condensed possibly even creating new universes inside themselves. A roiling bubbling foam of dimensions.
There's theory which explains galaxy rotation curve without dark matter, it calls "Metric dynamics" by Russian scientist Sergei Siparov (or "Anisotropic geometrodynamics", which is expansion of special and general relativity theories), which states (from the second name) that our space is in fact anisotropic. It seem to also explain such unique things as Hercules-Corona Borealis Great Wall.
So his idea is to replace a kind of matter that we cannot detect with another kind of matter we cannot detect.
Thank you!
Sort of. It replaces a kind of matter we have been failing to detect for decades with a kind of matter we've haven't started looking for yet, it might be easy if we look in the right place. Also, the dark matter they were looking for only solved one of two problems, if they found it, dark energy would still be an unknown. This could explain both with a single particle. I have this nagging suspicion that it might have been anti-neutrons all along, and they never noticed the tiny anti-gravitational effect that one particle had on all the test equipment.
Or, to replace an empty hypothesis, with a hypothesis that we can prove wrong/right. Depends on how you see it.
@@katrinal353 yeah but the problem is that we don't know what dark matter is. Thinking of dark matter as negative matter describes it perfectly, yet just like dark matter we don't know what negative matter is.
@@rolandshelley5165 Well, negative matter is matter with negative mass. My point is, it's more information than it was before. And you can prove the model is accurate, if it's proven that the math follows the observations. It's a step forward to a more complete model, and more ways towards new research. Nothing in science is some breaking new information that twists everything around. Everything is progressive work.
Dear Anton; This is similar to Hoyle's notion that empty space created matter. Interesting!
When the answer is stupid simple and people always miss it.
No.
When scientists are told to ignore things because the holy lord Einstein said it was impossible, it's not about being simple, it's about challenging dogma.
positron underVolt Einstein considered that it could be a thing but he didn’t know dark matter existed at the time
@@positronundervolt4799 He never said it was impossible. The consensus at the time was that the Universe was static, so Einstein added a constant to keep it static. He never said anything about it being impossible.
@@positronundervolt4799 electric universe makes waaaay more sense
@@positronundervolt4799 exactly it's about the force of dogma, that inhibits free thought and sponsors obedient parrots.
This model starts off with a -ve/+ve base field...
Liquid Crystal Space -- Bottom-Up Universe Thought Experiment.. Colloidal Crystal Multiverse
Hex Lattice: cell +6, flux -6. Pulls 6 opposites to escape speed (C) in 1 cell radius
Tunneling: stretched, faster than light front, light speed (C) or slower rear
Tunneling cells form in sync extrons+holons that often annihilate to regular='empty' lattice
Tunneling particles reform elsewhere. Their original space 'heals' as regular empty lattice
Particles: Inflows repel. 6 equatorial and 2x3 polar flows (-6 if poles flow in, +6 if out)
Extron: free extra cell compresses the lattice, pulls flux that repels as rays
Holon: flux-rich lost cell hole stretches the lattice, pulls in cells that repel as rays
Dipolons: extron + holon.. Diextron: +ve + -ve extron.. Diholon: +ve + -ve holon
Tempons: Cellon: lattice chunk.. Fluxon: holes.. heal to extrons+holons and/or/then annihilate
Moving extrons push cells that -ve flux space behind pulls in with an inertia-providing kick
Particles are surrounded by pilot waves that can diffract, interfere and alter trajectory
Dipolon / Antimatter: out of sync extron+holon. In sync annihilate and radiate excess flux
Black Hole Universes / Recursive Conformity: Big Bang = black holes colliding and merging
Gravity squeezes and syncs extrons+holons, charge flow stops at light speed. Annihilation
A minimum cell size / max density / critical mass is likely.. Shell gravity cancels inside
Level n +/- or other (joined) particle fields (+ free particles) feasible
Mass: (number of) out of place lattice cells. Extrons, holon charge flow
Gravity: quantum pull, universal squeeze. Centralised inflows, outflows usually join inflows
Mass pulls flux pulls mass. Lattice vibes up to 1 cell radius and light speed effect matter
Mass uses up flux so void cells repel more. Universes trap cells so gravity shrinks the lattice
Dark Energy: black hole feeds, core shell annihilates, excess flux radiates, lattice expands
Photon / Light / Time: relatively quantum.. particle vibes ripple charge outflows
Moves between cells in a constant time (+ universe expansion) as denser lattice slows light
Gravity shrinks and acceleration compresses the lattice so both absolutely slow light locally
Units shrink too, acceleration slows kinetic processes so local vacuum light speed measures C
Velocity stretches kinetic processes in time as they travel more to complete. Clocks slow
Transverse waves concentrate charge flow mass to a point. 2D adds effective area
Accompanying lattice compression pilot waves diffract in a slit. Overridden by detector fields
The Standard Model: the possibilities are numerous. Some SM particles may be tempons
I love your videos Anton. This was one of the best yet
Algebra 101 - always check your signs : D
Wouldnt this mean countless more consequences? Is there also negative mass antimatter? Are there negative mass black holes (would that be a white hole?), did negative mass trigger/drive the big bag? Why doesnt the negative mass interact with normal mass or is invisible? If the universe expands, so that makes the positive energy of the universe larger, therefore negative mass pops out of existence all the time? Doesnt that mean, the universe isnt accelerating in its expansion (could be an illusion, of negative mass affected expansion differently back in time / was more concentrated).
Is "negative matter" just "stuff that doesn't have a good word to say about anything"??
You mean like cosmic feminism? XD
I know, not the channel for it but still.
It's basically... material with negative mass, or if you like, a negative energy (E=mc^2, after all). It's just the best way we have of saying it.
Does it even matter?
@@MushVPeets That equation will always be positive for any input.
@@briannielsen2002 If m is negative, E is negative, and vice versa.
brilliant. finding a concept that after running it in a gravitational simulator, result in patterns matching reality. must be right. cheers to you.
Anton I've literally been trying been trying to understand what dark matter is and out of all the videos ive ever seen this one definitely just blew my mind now i understand finally what dark matter is thank you man !! Happy i subscribed a long time ago !
Could this also lead to the conundrum of why we have matter and no antimatter?
Anti matter exists
@@KidArkx I think he meant why the majority of the universe is comprised of matter and not animatter
Anti-matter has mass. It has the opposite charge from its matter counterpart.
NASA said anti-matter costs 62.5 Trillion dollars per gram to produce in 1999.
Yeoss :3 We actually have warehouses full of anti matter held within vacuum containers.
The singularity of the super massive black hole in the center of the galaxy creates a bubble between universes. That bubble pushes the nearby universes and creates a negetive mass effect there. Thats what we call dark energy. We cant see it because it not in our universe but we can feel it. Can i get a thumbs up?
yes but now we have to look for negative matter which isn't any better than looking for dark matter. Also how can you have less than 0 mass?
CleanerBen if we work out how something can have less than 0 mass, wow, that would completely rewrite science! We can finally have our antigravity hover cars!
Photons are massless.
It’s almost like how mathematicians were when it came to taking the square root of negative numbers. They invented a way (by defining i = sqrt(-1)) and look at us today. I think a similar thing will happen with negative mass.
So dark matter is basically like Element Zero from the Mass Effect series..?
Sure. Why not? Lol
i knew it last night i was talking to friends about negative matter in the universe. then this video shows up in my feed. I genuinely have not seen this until today. I just had a massive boost in confidence, perhaps some other ideas are also accurate.
Our smart phones eavesdrop.
I know off topic but wasn't 70 million the amount of 💰 that Bruce Willi's character in the late 1990s movie "The Jackel" where he played a high top professional hit man. Wasn't $70M supposed to be his pay off if he was successful in pulling of that last hit job before he was instead stopped and killed at the end of the film?
Good film, but I preferred the Edward Fox version.
It's a neat idea for sure, but then we are replacing one tiny unknown particle with a whole new hail Mary branch of physics... that is quite a gigantic leap to take.
I see what you're saying, but isn't that what physics did already with the LCDM notion of 27% of the universe being the Hail Mary of Dark Matter and 68% of the universe being Dark Energy ?
It's a suprise to be sure, but a welcomed one.
@@FloatingOer Unexpected prequel memes.
Not really, it's still an unknown tiny particle, it's just that they've been searching for the wrong thing - Weakly Interacting Massive Particles instead of Negative Mass Particles. I don't know for sure, but it sounds like this implies there is an anti-Higgs boson? Maybe they can recalibrate the LHC to look for that?
Our universe is electric all this is already figured out....
DarkEnergy is a mathmyth.
It's a Fudge because the Maths isn't working.
I think it's kind of like a 12 volt battery system. Like atoms have a positive and negative charge and atoms represent the positive charged and dark energy represents the negative charge. We just need to figure out how to tap into the negative charge and combine the two and we'll have it all figured out then. The end of fossil fuels as we know it. And we wouldn't stop talking about it, we'd do nothing but talk about it cuz we'd have so much to talk about then.
sounds like you know already but if you don't I bet you'll be interested in the Electrical Universe theory
Do not do science video If you can't tolerate that millions of dollar were spent on dark matter, Go & join senate. Do you even know the 'value' of discovery, It's priceless!
There wasn't any discovery tho so your argument is fully mute, additionally we have limited resources to work with so we need to prioritize them, thus any large expense that doesn't lead to a net benefit is by definition a waste of resources.
A theory to explain a theory.
Hypothesis*
Alien Ami: Guesses.
@@spenner3529 "Hmm, I think we can make a hot, warm, glowing thing by rubbing these two sticks together.. but it's just a theory that it can even be made to begin with, so of course I shouldn't theorize on how to make it." ~The caveman who could've doomed humanity.
In order to make a theory, you have to make sense of things. In order to make sense of things, you have to theorize. A 'theory' by the usual usage of the term is just something we haven't figured out for sure yet, and saying "It's just a theory" won't help you figure it out.
Cat Poke: I’m guessing-sorry, theorizing-you have too much time on your hands.
@@spenner3529 I never said I make theories. I'm saying you shouldn't criticize those who do just because they can't come up with a conclusion out if thin air, without any thought as to how it could work beforehand.
I've been saying it's the math for years and being called a crackpot.
@Greg Moonen maybe... Maybe not. Mathematicians once proved the planets orbit earth.
@Greg Moonen I'll look it up and get back to you.
@Greg Moonen at least you have an open mind😁
I'm just saying that if your math says there should be a rock in front of you but you can't see a rock, maybe it's your math that is the problem, not the invisible rock.
Beware of any intellectual that labels those who question them as crackpots. Sometimes the intellectual is misguided (Newton).
@Greg Moonen one more thought... Maybe you should actually watch the video.
@Greg Moonen no. I did very well, thanks for your concern.
Oh yeah, not only is the rock invisible but you can't touch it, taste it or smell it. But.... What da maths😂
Subscribed. Keep up the great work
Interesting. When Ben Rich of Lockheed Skunk-works was asked by an Engineer how does the propulsion system work? (referring to the craft that can take "ET" home) he asked "How does ESP work?" The Engineer answers in a guessing tone "All points in space and time are connected?" Ben answers "That's how it works." in the calamity of reporters shouting Ben tuns and adds "There was a mistake in the math."
We can’t find dark matter because it doesn’t exist!
there's a lot of things in the universe we don't understand, that doesn't mean they don't exist..
Well its clear you are not educated enough to talk about the topic.
What do you base your claims on?
@@TheSuperCoolMan122 Saying that something exists(at least in the way scientists talk of dark matter) is in itself defining it, thus claiming some sort of understanding. Dark matter and Dark energy are more properly defined as inserted variables into antiquated equations in order to make sense of astronomical observations. Instead of scientists talking about dark matter and dark energy as though they are accurate assumptions, the proper scientific approach would be to focus on the inconsistencies and similarities of models vs reality without naming and mathematically defining the thing which you do not actually understand...
"Dark Matter" and "Dark energy" represent our misinterpretation of the interactions between what we call gravity and the electric weak and strong forces..
It might not exist as a matter that only interacts gravitationally, but it very much does exist as discrepancy between our understanding of physics and actual observations. Calling it Dark Matter is not an answer in any way, it's a label for an unsolved problem. We might as well call it "Invisible Pixie Dust", but "Dark Matter" sounds a bit more dignified.
Um. NO. Dark matter doesn't have negative mass. The entire REASON for proposing the existence of dark matter was to explain an apparent EXCESS of mass in galaxies beyond what could be seen. That's POSITIVE mass. It's outrageous enough to just propose negative mass as an explanation for ANYTHING, but it is self defeating to propose it as dark matter.
medexamtoolsdotcom
No no no.
They have the same (a) vectors just because fg is negative dosen’t mean they will just avoid eachother.
And you really should say that im thinking you dont even have physics and say these things to make people angry.
Are you Bulgarian?
Yeah, I am curious as well
I think he's French Canadian
he's a Russian Montrealer
He's a multidimensional being
Hes a Russian who lived in Canada and now lives in South Korea (i think?)
MOND postulates that gravity is not constant, but varies over large distance. Scientists criticize it for lacking a theoretical basis, an explanation oh “how” and “why”. I read recently that more scientists are starting to believe that gravity is inconstant; you recently had a video about the Hubble Constant being inconstant. It strikes me that this approach appears to fit the facts better than conventional “dark matter” models, and provides the theoretical basis. I would appreciate your take on this idea.
Allow me to offer a simple idea to explain why negative mass doesn’t repulse itself and attracts itself instead but not so much regular matter. Gravity is explained as bending the fabric of space time. We often simulate this by showing a large object on a cloth and how it makes the cloth stretch and dip down. Well, if negative mass exists then it should have negative gravity. It would essentially be like putting an object on the opposite side of the cloth and stretching the cloth and dipping up. It would act the same as any other mass would in space just mirrored. When negative mass surrounds regular mass it would naturally repel the normal mass but at the same time would bind itself to the rest of the negative mass surrounding it.
Bob Lazar called this element 115
short awnser : no.
I personally think you are the greatest. I wish I had a friend like you! Keep up the excellent work - it's totally COSMIC!
1. How can force be the opposite direction to acceleration, force causes acceleration so they must by definition be in the same direction.
2. Dark matter is required, because we noticed there isn't enough visible mass to hold the universe together, therefore to fill the dark matter gap it must by definition attract, we invented the idea of dark matter because we need something that attracts like normal mass but is invisible/undetectable in all other ways, therefore the one single defining feature of dark matter is that it has positive mass, its the only thing we know for sure about it.
Love it! The drama and comedy of life. Good video.
It gives us what we have not had before: a method of directly testing the theory. That is totally sane.
This may seem an unlikely theory....but is it theoretically possible that the reason we cannot detect dark matter or energy is because the source may actually be cracks in space where another, possibly anti-matter universe seeps through into our universe?
Sort of like how water will seep into crevices where there are cracks in a foundation.
That thought has been in my mind since I first heard of Dark matter.
I'd appreciated your thoughts on this idea.
The bubble thumbnail is a great example.
The bubbles (representing matter) and the spaces surrounding (represents space)
I can try to understand the elasticity between matter and dark matter theory, but it’s more likely matter by nature drives to be as dense as possible.
There is no such thing as negative matter.
Include electricity & refer to 'Thunderbolts Project' . Confirm with 'electrical scarring of Mars', and 'Comet 67P'
Yea. The claimed negative mass could just be the repulsive component of gravity in the electric universe model.
What you need to understand is not finding something, is finding something. It can help to rule out possibilities and disprove theories. When you observe, seeing “nothing” is a result.
Do we know if there is a relation to the graviton? No, because we've neither found a fermion nor a boson that could explain dark matter and the gravition. It's possible that the graviton is a force-carrying particle inherent in interactions between fermions and gravitons like the photon that governs interactions of the electromagnetic force between electrons/positrons. This would be much easier without heading to "information entropy and entanglement" or even wormholes with a negative energy space-time torsion. If that is so then I would think that using photons and electrons are the way of the dinosaur in trying to map our universe. This uncertainty is attributed to the first rule in that our current instruments are lost at the event horizon of black holes and with non-electromagnetic force interacting matter within galaxies and throughout space. That would be the first clue since ,at the instant of the formation of a black hole, the structure seems to vanish almost entirely from the electromagnetic spectrum and release minimal hawking radiation as a consequence of the disturbance in the quantum field. Since our laws of conservation of mass and energy would be based on electromagnetic fields and baryonic matter, it may be that these laws would no longer work for black holes and dark matter. This futility of the photon would lead me to believe that all of this could be due to the Higgs field. Perhaps we do not know enough about the role of the Higgs field in systems with high amounts of immeasurable potential. This is all theoretical.