What is Res Ipsa Loquitor?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 14 окт 2024
- What is Res Ipsa Loquitor? This video discusses circumstances where a plaintiff in a negligence lawsuit may rely on the circumstances of an accident to prove that a defendant breached her duty of care.
uslawessentials.com/blog
uslawessentials.com/course-list
I have found my new torts teacher, thank you for making it so much easier than law school. The examples are great. Please do more on scope of liability, causation etc.
If you have problems with tort law, just wait till you get to cons law.
Great videos. Loved the bit of dance animation there!
+Rajat Agrawal Thanks very much!
The concept is from Byrne v. Boadle in 1863. It wasn't a refrigerator, it was a barrel of flour from the second floor of a shop. In law school, we took "res (pronounced race) ipsa loquiter" to mean "If a barrel falls on your head, it's the other guy's fault."
Thanks for the easiest explaination.. it really helped me a lot to understand the concept in a short period.
This is the cutest law channel I've seen thumbs up for the little dancing Anime Girls and Anime Judge lol!
Thanks sir.
The word "eloquence" is related to speech. The term "loquitur" is linguistically related to "eloquence," and therefore "loquitur" means "to speak."
"Ipsilateral" means "on the same side." "Ipsa" means "the same thing" or "itself."
"Res ipsa loquitur" means "the thing speaks for itself."
From 2:19 to 2:38 is the best part and the entire summary of res ipsa loquitur.
That dance moves though😂😂😂😂
brilliant!!! thank you for breaking this down and explaining
Thanks!
the voice over was extremely calming .
thank you for explaining this so easily ♥️♥️♥️
Thanks for watching NS. Let me know if other topics interest you. uslawessentials.com/blog
Actually entertaining n it was easy to understand in such beautiful animated way👍🏻
On the white board (0m16s) we are told that we may presume that the defendant must have been careless. In the cartoon (2m32s) we are told that we may presume that the defendant had been careless. The word "must" is used in the first description of what may be presumed, but not in the second. Only the second seems to me to describe a rebuttable presumption. Clarification would be appreciated.
Great video! Thank you for the concise and clear explanation.
Glad it was helpful!
Even a child could understand! Brilliant and hilarious court dance moves! Wish I could sue Nike outlet for negligence.
Fantastic video
On the question of physician-assisted suicide, could rest ipsa loquitur be used as an argument for why someone should be allowed the assistance? it seems to me quite reasonable that if someone asks for physician-assisted suicide, that the act itself rises above self preservation enough so that it should be honored automatically.
Thank you for making these posts! Clearly explained! Greatly appreciated!
Thanks, you can see more at uslawessentials.com
good video. thank you
this was helpful, thanks
Hi, congratulations for this awesome work it helps me a lot!
Sky Al Thanks! Stay tuned for updates. uslawessentials.com
In the Case Miller vs Jacoby (2001), Does the fact that the defense did produce expert witness testimony negate a successful res ipsa loquitur outcome?
I didn't know the defendants produced expert testimony. Is that in the case?
Well explained. Thank you ❤️ great example too 😊
Thanks! uslawessentials.com
Thank you very much!
You're welcome. Good to hear from you.
You guys rock
How can it apply to a car accident,? Res ipsa liquitor vs doctrine of last clear chance....
thankyou very much .
Sure!
It means "The thing speaks for itself." Lawyers like to talk strangely.
Amazing explanation, post more please. In particular on promissory estoppel? Thanks
Hi Ami,
1. Here you are....ruclips.net/video/srNCkjq90sE/видео.html
2. Thanks for your kind words.
3. I have a blog and forum where you can explore some more. The forum would greatly benefit from strong students who are studying US law and willing to share suggestions with students who are at a more basic level. More advanced students can also assist each other with trickier topics. Take a look please...uslawessentials.com/forum
Ahhh u are literally amazing. Fantastic quality video excellent expertise I will definitely come back for more. Keep up the great work. Many thanks
Pls explain me this topic sir
Malicious prosecution and nuicence
Thanks dude... So simple... Got it... ❤️
Thanks Daypayan. More here: uslawessentials.com
Where are their arms and legs :-) Great video- love your way of teaching!
Ugh .
I
Not to be confused with negligence per se
Can you please do videos that encompass Civil Procedure? JMOL, JNOV and preclusion doctrine? Thank you.
DittyK, that's a helpful suggestion. I do have some videos on CivPro (ruclips.net/p/PLRXyknBDMNN20dypjtwUqxlJqkacsHTUf) but will add to the playlist including Rules 50, 59 and preclusion.
USLawEssentials Sounds good, I appreciate it. The examples in your videos help me see how the black letter of the law is actually applied.
Wowww so creative mates!
Les Ipso Loquitor shall be appropriate in mediation matters in the medical profession .Doctors would face negligence for treating a patient and charging for an ailment that never prevailed converting hospitals into profit making bodies. The noble profession has finally bedn included under the Consumer Act. Medical profession has been covered under tge Consumer Protection Act but does not cover government hospitals or government employees treated in private hospitals claiming from govt. So, patients are referred to pathologists and hospitals by govt. doctors. this was to introduced to make the service available convenient besides land lease agreement of hospital bldg etc.
The question is how can you differentiate a patient as consumer and ine who is not a consumer merely on the basis of receiving payment. The next question that arises is the patient fies not pay for himself many times when on bed. Its from his account, his guardian who pays for him. How can a civil servant who has entered into a service contract includes medical benefits not be a consumer. The govt. may provide private or public facility is its policy. The doctors are paid from revenue . How do insurance companies deal with it?
sir acha hai apka explanation
What if she has a visitor and that person did it
Isn't is Loquitur?
I don't think so, but I'm happy to be corrected.
I am here for the sassy animation.
Plz put these videos as Tort playlist
Hey there! I think this is on the playlist. Sorry if I’m mistaken.
So, I'll answer the question at hand-What is res ipsa loquiter? The thing or transaction speaks for itself. What can I tell you you have to have a halo over your head.
The characters are cute
brb taking that fridge thats on my roof down
love from bangladesh 🇧🇩
Who's here because of Johnny Depps tattoo? (And the trial against Amber Turd)
Ts anyc one,thnx
All the debbies have disliked the video 😂
The pronunciation made me cringe but good information.
Z
WELL EXPLAINED THANK U ...
Your injured plaintiff dancing in court when the verdict went her way is wholly inappropriate.
why the anime characters tho 🥴
everything was right but animation is disgusting sir💀