Will these make your SPEAKERS sound BETTER? || Sonarworks SoundID vs Dirac Live
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 4 авг 2024
- Check Sonaworks SoundID here: www.sonarworks.com/
Check Diract Live here: www.dirac.com/live/
MERCHANDISE: teespring.com/stores/white-se...
EXTRA CONTENT: / whiteseastudio
STUDIO: whiteseastudio.com
BUY GEAR WITH MY AFFILIATE LINK:
Thomann: www.thomann.de/intl/thlpg_ki6...
Sweetwater: imp.i114863.net/avPYN
INDEX:
00:00 - Intro
00:45 - What is Room EQ?
01:19 - Sonarworks SoundID
04:31 - Dirac Live
06:22 - Ringing?
07:08 - How flat is flat?
08:00 - I would choose...
10:06 - Disclosure
10:47 - Support me! 
Хобби
What monitors are those ?
Good ones!
@@Whiteseastudio what's the name of them 😀??
@@kevinkatinas535 apparently those are one of a kind speakers, had something in memory
Sandstorm by Darude… or… wait 🤔
@@Hartweizengriesspudding They look Epic. Now I have to wonder about the sound...💫
Hi Wytse, thank you from Sonarworks for the video - we did know you are working on this :) just to clarify, Sonarworks is still the company name but with the latest software version that was released in March 2021 we did go through the re-branding and now the product name is SoundID Reference.
I’ve been using sonarworks and sound ID for a while and it allowed me to hear exactly what I was doing in the mix and made my music translate to other sources in a way that sounded almost perfectly outside of the studio environment. Trust me sonarworks really works.
Thanks for doing this video! I actually come from both a Sonarworks user and a Dirac Live user. I have licenses for both softwares and have used both extensively. My honest opinion and my personal one is I prefer Dirac Live way over Sonarworks. I do not have the luxury of a big room thus the room modes are a little wonky for my space. I noticed it immediately when I moved into my current space and even upgrading my speakers to Amphion One15s + a FlexBase25 stereo subwoofer, my room wasn't doing the speakers justice. So I had to resort to DRC to help me continue doing work.
During my times using Sonarworks, I found the stereo imaging a little scattered. I can't explain it but it always felt that elements in a song mix tend to lose it's position, even when I'm mixing songs it felt it took me a long time to find a good spot for elements in my mix. I stumbled upon Dirac Live a little while back and it totally blew me away. I felt my Amphions were really what they should sound after going through correction, that was the reason why I switched over to Amphions after test driving it in a store. The imaging was extremely precise, centre image was spot on and even moving the pan knob by 1-2 notches in Protools was really obvious. The biggest thing i noticed was my transient response, it felt super tight and precise after the Dirac correction. What i understand is that Dirac also corrects for speaker timings so it hits your ears at the same time.
You can actually customise a filter in the Dirac Room Correction app to your taste and I don't think it's supposed to be completely "flat" per se. I actually did my own filters to tweak the sound of the DRC to my ears and I'm really enjoying it. I hope this gives your viewers and also yourself a perspective of someone who has used both softwares as well. =)
The quality and info of these videos are so good! I really enjoy watching your videos learned alot throughout the years. Groetjes :)
9:32 "Imagine that you have an 18 decibel gap coming from a standing wave at your listening position". In that case all you can do is move your listening position. The peaks and nulls of standing waves (aka room modes) depend on the geometry of your room. You can attenuate them by judiciously positioning the speakers and through acoustic treatment, but you can't move them. Also, you can't fill a gap, i.e. a null point of a room mode. If you boost the affected frequency, you increase the peaks surrounding the null, but at the position of the null, the sound waves (of the particular frequency) still cancel out.
All correct, except that you actually can fill the null of a room mode just by (physically, most likely with a resonator) attenuating the corresponding pressure boost, on the other hand, if it's not room mode but it's SBIR, then you cannot.
Got no big Studio etc, but a pair of Speakers and different headphones. Sonarworks helped me a lot getting the right balance of frequencies. Before my music often sounded just bad on different devices like in the car. So maybe a person like me, without a big studio, is the right target. I am happy with it.
As a user of Sonarworks since 2019 I can honestly say it changed my whole home-studio experience and lifted my confidence immeasurably. It isn’t cheap, but it’s one of the best purchases I’ve made
I noticed you were using the Umik-1 in the 0° orientation. Dirac is designed to deal with the reflections and interactions with the room so they recommend you use it in the 90° orientation with the 90° calibration file loaded into Dirac for your Umik-1 of course. You may find you will get better end results with your sound that way. Cheers.
I've been using Sonarworks for a few years now, and at first I couldn't hear any difference. But even after a couple of weeks of using it, it became very apparent how much easier it was for me to hear what was going on in my mixes. Particularly, the low-mids sounded much more precise, and I could much more accurately process my tracks and not get distracted by any resonances my room created.
So overall, Sonarworks is super useful (at least in my bedroom setup)
I’m in a treated room with experience monitors. I have been using sonarworks for many years I must say that Dirac sounds so much better. I use it together with a minidsp box going direct into my speakers. There are some latency but it let me listen to all my hardware through it. It’s great.
Mini DSP box? Sounds interesting, what kind more specific? Thanks. 😊
I had to move studio a few years back, the shape of the new room was as such that despite f*** loads of bass traps the bass response was errrr not great. I wasn't a believer in these things but out of pure desperation I tried sonarworks.... I'm now a believer. Saved my life
Had a weird experience with Sonarworks after using it for about a year, it seems to have a sound of its own and it didn't work for me( with my former setup at least). When I tried the Dirac I found it more natural to my ears, however I'm trying to get my room and monitor setup as best as I can before I consider adding any room eq corrections again..
Cheers, Wytse. Interesting as always.
Great content as usual. Saving your viewers £££s with your honesty.
I think sonarworks says you can use a mic stand when making measurements. This helped me get more accurate results.
Ofc 🙏🏼
How do you know? lol
Hi , iv got sonarworks ,I have a question , I have a SSL6 mixing desk which will be in my mixing chain , when I’m setting up my speakers to sonarworks to calibrate should I plug my mic in to the mixing desk then from the desks to the soundcard. Or should I plug the mic straight into the sound card or interface , thanks
Nice analysis! Thank you!
Neumann's DSP 750 subwoofer is the best I've tried! I own Sonarworks, IK Arc III and have torture tested Dirac and they all have strengths and weaknesses - my tipping point was when I used REW to create my own room correction and it was the one I ended up using! The Neumann DSP software was co-developed with Fraunhofer IIS (yes... the mp3 people) and doesn't try to just make your speakers flat but instead aims to make your monitors sound "as best as possible in your room"... so no gaining of 18dB going on here. As the DSP is in the subwoofer you set the monitors flat and the subwoofer controls the EQ, phase and time alignment. The good news is you don't specifically need Neumann monitors as the subwoofer is essentially in control of everything. Finally, the DSP is stored in the subwoofer DSP so no latency or need of a monitoring plugin - I had to disable Sonarworks when recording as the latency was huge.
I recently made the switch from Sonarworks to Dirac. I had countless issues with sonarworks, issues locating the mic during measurement, extreme latency (500ms in some cases), and CPU hungry processing. Sonarworks linear phase EQ option I also found was absolutely unbearable with audible pre ringing artifacts on transient sounds like kick drums. With Dirac, I felt the tonal balance is spot on, but I also experienced a dramatic change in stereo imaging quality with the time alignment featured in Dirac on my Dynaudio Core 59 monitors. It was honestly a night and day difference from the first second I ran audio through it. The front to back depth and stereo imaging precision is vastly improved. Sonarworks did a fine job with the tonal balance IMO, but Dirac took the sound quality to new heights in a phase linear way with at least no "audible" ringing artifacts to my ear.
Same experience as I had, Dirac sounded way more natural and was easier to adjust to my liking. However, Dirac's time alignment introduces another kind of phase issue, try to run a sine sweep in mono to see if it affects you too. I'm switching to a Trinnov ST2 pro to address that.
@@johannesahlberg Hey Johannes. I found this anomaly as well, but it is related to the "delay compensation" check box. I sit directly between the speakers, and when I switch this off I have no phase issues. Let me know if this helps.
Interesting review! I did the same comparison about a year ago, and I found Dirac to sound better :). The installation hassle isn't really an argument for me, because it's set and forget. An hour or two more of my time for better sound are well worth it. As for the ringing, Dirac tries to correct the phase response as well, which as far as I know Sonar doesn't. Depending on what kind of speakers one has, this might make quite a difference and of course also cause ringing (have to test this now!). It's actually supposed to improve the impulse response. Measuring with REW I noticed that indeed the phase response was more linear, the impulse response however remained largely the same. Still can't get the Trinnov out of my head 😬...
How about bugs and bugs fixing? Quite some bad reviews on Sonarworks. I'm super sceptical about making my hole mixing system so vulnerably to only one software. If I get used to it I need it to be reliable. It's really not a nice place to be when it breaks down. I would choose stability over user-friendly any day... So what are your thoughts and experience with it so far? Thank you in advance. ☺️
@@lydfar2392 I didn't experience any difficulties with either, so I can't really give advice there. But I've been running Dirac for a year now and never had an issue. It just does it's thing.
i have no doubt that you are a very good audio engineer , but if you ever get bored ..... i bet you could be a great stand up comedian !!
ARC System 3 by IK multimedia did it for me. Most people sleep on IK stuff, but they are golden.
I already wanted to ask how they compare to it. The ARC System also seems to be more reasonably priced.
@@AnthonyMcBazooka He's being a fanboy. ARC is the worse than all of them. No systemwide capability.
I use Dirac live profile stored on minidsp 22d hardware. Connected digitally to dynaudio core 7 speakers. Works great, completely sysyemwide "set & forget". very happy. 👍🏻
Hi and thanks for this video!. Have you test Psi Audio Avaa C20 active bass traps?. I heard good things about them, curious about what you think?. They are not cheap but seem to do a good job between 15 - 150hz and they do not take up as much space as passive good bass traps. Best/Mathias
I've tried Sonarworks in my studio, and even though I did like the corrected frequency response, I did not like some additional artifacts. The stereo field got a lot less precise, and it seemed to sound a bit more phasey. I have very nice speakers in an ok room; it's treated but not professionally. I decided to not use it in the studio. However, I do have a pair of shitty speakers in my home office, where I often check mixes. I've found Sonarworks to really does wonders here, and I like the sound a lot. In my opinion, if you have good speakers in a medium to good room, really listen carefully if the change it makes is really an improvement.
Using DSP on a referencing system kind of defeats the purpose of the reference imo
I find that sw works better in linear phase mode. Sounds much cleaner at the cost of more latency. But you wouldn’t track with sonarworks on
Tried that also, but that smears the low end a bit due to ringing. It would be nice to be able to apply the same filter to both speakers instead of processing both speakers individually. Then at least the phase and stereo imaging would remain in tact.
@@ralphverdult Disable listening spot adjustment.
I have tried Sonarworks for over a year with my Focal Solo6 be monitors but Sonarworks just couldn’t overcome the low end issues with my treated room. The answer for me since I haven’t been able to fix my room yet is the VSX headphones solution from Slate Digital. My mixes translate much better across the board and with much less guessing and quicker results. Can you do a review of the VSX headphones?
Does dirac also offer correction for headphones? That is a big pre for SoundID (or Reference 4 which is the previous version which I still use)
I know miniDSP have something they call “ears” its their headphone calibration device to fix frequency response. Im not sure if dirac is involved in that tho, but it might be.
Im still yet to get a mix that Im happy with using Sonarworks. Having the visuals of seeing which frequencies are boosted/dipped is useful, but I always prefer how my mixes turn out when I don't use it. Im guessing its a lot to do with my room treatment and the reflections I'm getting.
Your ears have probably learn't to understand and trust what they are hearing. I think this is still the preferred option if your room isn't horrendous.
Thank you for the walk thru.
Which changes, in the signal chain would make someone having to recalibrate their room/monitors? I guess a new audio interface changes the sound a bit, but how much and is there anything else? A change in cables, etc..?
I've been using Sonarworks for over a year now. I bought the package with Sennheiser HD650 headphone with a custom calibration curve. I really like they way they sounded when mixing. I don't have a studio setup at home, just Pro Tools and an interface and I was just working on mixes while waiting to get our studio up and running again. It was a great help mixing ITB. However, I have to agree with others about the amount of bugs in the software. It doesn't feel like it gets a very thorough QC cycle when they release new versions. And when I tried to calibrate the monitors at the studio after getting back in business, the software crashes every time before it makes it throw the calibration check. They'd release a new version and we'd try it again and it would still crash. This is a brand new i9 desktop with plenty of horsepower and RAM and nothing installed but Pro Tools, and the interface software.
Awesome review! I have Sonarworks and I came to the same conclusion as you.
Be great if you reviewed the IK Multimedia ARC III room analysis tool, and compare with Direc and Sonar.
I tried to optimize my studio as far as possible and then added SoundID/Sonarworks to get those few extra % and I am really impressed how much better my own or my clients' music sounds now on all devices, I can only recommend it :-)
Totally agree. I had the same experience in my studio. My mixes transfer much better between different systems.
This was a very good review.
Exactly my same experience. Now its so much easier to deliver awesome mixtes I almost dont need to check t'hem outside. Best invesment ever, aside from acosutic treatment
@@miquelmarti6537 thank you form Sonarworks - we are more than delighted to hear that :)
My system is pretty decent till about 200 Hz ( haven't finished treating the space) but I can say SoundID is lovely and pretty much matched my REW measurements. I see your system gets to 10 Hz, I'm lucky I can hear down to 35 Hz accurately
I've used Sonorworks and IK Arc and hated the results from both the same way. Monitors felt phasey and over hyped. All the mixes I tried with them activated were problematic. IMO I think it is better to just get to know your monitors and maybe use a very light parametric eq to tune known problem areas. Maybe get a look at it all with Room EQ Wizard or even SMAART and adjust by ear. IF you are making adjustments over a dB or two, you have other problems like room treatment, like he said.
I have SoundID and i really like it, but the high end really feels dead with it, the measurements you did seems really accurate to me. Great video as always!
on-off topic: What do you think should we find a proper way to tune the speakers accordingly to our hearing problems, rather than surgical room corrections. For example when i was 14 unfortunately i had a firework exploded right next to my left ear on new years eve. I turned 30 nov last year recently i made myself an audiogram and it seems my right ear is doing a perfect flat response to all spectrum, my left ear has some problems around 300-500 hz, -6 to -9 db and from 15k to 20k -6 db. ...I made experiment runing a eq on left channel to help my left ear, and it does help a little on studio monitors to my perception , the problem is the stereo imaging is going bad even with linear phase mode, seems impossible to make it work... however it's amazing when applied for headphones. This little handicap i learned to adapt with it even tough my brain is always aware, it's been 8 years since i work as a live sound engineer in the national theatre, and atm everybody is happy with my mixing. Neuroplasticity is a very interesting topic :)
You are totally correct about neuroplasticity. Our brains have the most advanced signal processing capabilities. It makes sense that the correction worked better for you with headphones.
I'm using an old KRK Ergo box. Helps a bit but sound panels made more difference for the same price.
still playing with it but im worried it will increase ear fatigue if it has to be on all the time as mines been boosted a fair bit in the lows and hi's now to what ive been used to for years (to get it to how it seems to think would be flat), i know i can change that with a custom eq change (which seems to be defeating the object a little) and lowering volumes, but I feel like metric A/B is all i need, and get used to a few ref tracks in relation to the sort of mix i want to achieve. i sussed putting it on the control room mixer in cubase was a much better way of working also over having it on the master out, and i do like the translation check options. for me its more useful for headphones and im finding longterm that i prefer my speakers without the plugin on. like i say, my speakers sound suddenly really bassier and brighter with it on, but i guess thats how my setup and ears are working with it right now and may take some time to adjust for sure
It must have a White sea preset ! Making my garage sounding like white sea studio !
Thanks, Now I don’t regret my SoundID 😆
I like SoundID on headphones more than on speaker, I think their algorithm really like to emphasize on the highs which is not my preference cos I’m sensitive to it a lot
IIRC, the KRK Rokit series has an app that supposedly senses and helps calibrate your monitors as well, but I don't know if those are anything near these solutions. I assume it's better than doing nothing, though.
Sonarworks is better when correcting rooms that aren’t as well built as your studio.
Do you guys think the measurement mic should be pointed upwards? It's an omnidirectional mic, isn't it?
Dirac Live also correct the phase of your system. As there is a lot of treatment in your monitoring path, it could explain the ringing problem you had. Because with a lot of speaker in less then ideal room, this phase correction really improve the sound quality. But it’s a real problem that you forgot this point in your review. Please try to prepare your video more to make fair vs content.
Sonarworks saved my life in mixing. 💯
I don't know whether Dirac improved quite a bit or not... but... I'm a user of Sonarworks for more than a year almost, and I'm just testing Dirac live (14-day trial). I'm also an advanced user of REW and I understand it, as well as most of the acoustics in physics... I even can do my own impulse responses now with minimum phase. My room is fairly treated with DIY walls, panels. SW is good, helps a lot for beginners, or those who are artists rather tan geeks. It removes the first blanket off your monitor. However SW never managed to get my bass right (the first nasty mode of my room at 34Hz). Even I struggled with this a lot in my IR files, and in SW I had to have tricky user IQs, which messes up phase quite a bit. And phase... very important factor. SW does not do phase correction, not even with IIR filters.
I just gave Dirac a go, a couple of minutes ago. It is straightforward too. Measured those 9 locations instead of SW's 37, I setup the target curve (just around 3dB boost below 100 and 0,5dB / octave decline from 4000 Hz to meet EBU criteria, and guess what, according to REW measurements it simply perfected the bass (no mod, no dips etc) and even aligned the phase where it could. At least I'm sitting in an absolute phase coherent 60cm spot from 90 Hz till 20k Hz. Impressive. If you have not heard anything in a good place, you won't know the difference. The bass is tighter, the transients are there, depth of sound field improved. It's like... yeah you enjoy the music on a good studio monitor, even the soundstage can be improved with a lot of things, but when the two monitor are really working together in terms of amplitude, phase and time, you'll hear it. With Dirac I could hear the drum in DP Get lucky properly... like you can touch it and you hear it's real drum, not just a bass tone. And all this with 512 buffer and 8ms latency. RUclips video required 1024 samples latency, all this pretty much in par with Sonarworks. Actually both are good company, I like both. They enhanced quite a bit in the past 1-2 years and they are reliable, but it seems Dirac's algorithm is really advanced and calculates and corrects phase without using too much FIR, so it can operate with 8-20ms latency and avoids ringing. I have not heard despite I pushed it hard.
I'll try Neumann MA1 with my main Neumanns, and probably it will stay. Proprietary systems can hardly fail. I just need money money money. : )))
You know how they have head trackers for emulating speakers in headphones? They should do that with speakers, so the correction changes depending on where you are sitting or standing in the room. Next level!
That’s genius. Get to work on that
Noooo, I don't think so. Think what it would do to your room reflections and also your own perception (our brains automatically compensate for slight movements in relation to a sound source - and THAT's why the headphone simulations of speakers "work", they fake the sound source perception, and they ONLY work if there's not too much latency in the whole system, otherwise it's just a nuisance). AND it's simply impossible to properly correct for any position outside of your limited listening zone. If I stand up and got to one side of the room, no software could ever correct for that because I'm suddenly not even in the "line of sight" of my speaker cones, and reflections from the wall become closer than the sound source itself.
The whole point is to track where you are in the room. Granted this is future thinking, but you’d have to measure many or even all points in your room. There could be a couple intermediary technologies that morphed between a limited number of sample points, but I think the math is doable. Plus, I don't think we're talking about extreme situations. Let's compensate for logical listening positions first, not the extreme sides of the room. As a tangent, when I'm mixing, I like to walk around the place. Even out in the hall. In the can, etc. Moving around in a mixing space help your brain compensate for the space it's in.
Sonarworks really needs to do some serious optimization and bug fixing on their software. Every update breaks something different. Serious bugs and optimization issues have gone unfixed since SoundID released. It works, but the user experience is just plain bad.
Absolutely. I really like Sonarworks - when it works. Stability is a disaster on my Mac mini M1.
I hated what it looked like so that's why I never upgraded
dirac live is a best value software, the only one who cares about real room issues and corrects phase and impulse responce which is huge because of TRANSIENTS improvement
The correction don't have to be flat at the listening position. The flat curve only happen in an anechoic room. At the listening position the target need to be the normalised JBL room curve. It the reason you have so much treble.
I use glm from my genelecs. Works super well 👌
I would be really interested in how these software packages with for dual subwoofer room correction. That's where the majority of the issues seem to be with me, and also where Dirac charges extra for. My my math, it's about $850 + microphone + DSP to get the _full_ Dirac software package
They have Dirac Live with a minidsp which you can hook up two subs, I got it since two weeks ago and it works great. It’s 570 euro including mic and Dirac license 😎
great video...
Good review. Ever tried Trinnov ST2?
Hi, thx the great video again!
We could be happy, if we can see freq response in REW without any roomcorrection, we can compare these:-).
Sometimes i beileve the "roomcorrection" is works, sometimes think about why not... and i hear something, but i am not sure.
It's corrected the whole listening chain. And we don't need expensive loudspeaker, amp, room threatment. Too beautiful, that it be true.
If you already corrected the room and flat the freq response, after the measurement, why not nearly flat? I cheked it also, several times:-).
This is a product what we dreaming, but we can't get, still not exist. It give us a partly solution, but not replaced the "real" room planning, threatment and studio speakers, etc...
Actually! AFAIK dirac corrects phase as well as frequency response. So the ”ringing” you’re seeing is probably ”anti-ringing”, in other words, ringing that’s trying to cancel the ringing of your room.
So it’s the opposite of what you said, the dirac should *sound* more accurate because of anti-ringing, even though it *looks* less accurate. This is of course, only if it succeeds in what it’s doing.
Wytse you didn't mention if you're gonna use either product in your new studio. I recall you were using Sonarworks in your old setup to flatten
My monitoring setup has processing built in already…
@@Whiteseastudio what is the processing chain in your rack?
I don’t really know 😅. Its all actively crossed
Great 👍 but why aren’t you showing us the complete correction curves of the measurement in Sound ID and DSP? Would have been interesting to see what was corrected in your room!
I honestly can't recommend the monitor correction from Soundworks. They make things far, far harsher. Both my friend and I experienced the same thing with different systems, massively heavy highs. Far as I know for Dirac, the measurement positioning does not need to be perfect. It determines the mics position automatically, just doesn't imply what it's doing during setup. Takes less time, too.
For the latency and ringing, Dirac does some phase correction, which as a matter of course will require the sound to be delayed. Perhaps, when you measured the room, your measurement length was too large to get an accurate grasp of the stereo spread. I've always had better centering with Dirac, though it's used on a pair of $2k monitors. I don't have any idea why it rings so much, though. You'd need some very high Q factors to get that kind of ringing, and honestly, I doubt Dirac would leave that problem in without good reason. Everything else about the processing seems very well thought out.
This is purely speculation. Just a really dumb guess about what it could possibly be. Say your room has resonances, what if, in your impulse response for the room correction, you added your own ringing with 180 degree phase that matched that room's resonances. Theoretically, you could cancel out that room's resonance.
On a price vs results review. In my experience, both Sonarworks and Dirac far outstrip equivalently priced room treatment. For new artists, I honestly recommend they use household materials to treat the room, then get Dirac, then invest in more treatment. In that order. Eventually the room will sound better than what the correction software can make up for, but that's already after they invested thousands of dollars in treatment, at which point the treatment software's cost is relatively negligible.
I am curious since I never got the chance: how well would Earthwork's measurement microphones work for these mics? Would they offer more for rooms already treated well?
You and Paul third the only people I trust on RUclips I wasted so much money that I don’t have buying stuff I thought work because of you RUclips anything you guys said work did
When you modify a sound to target a curve, the more you bend the more of the sound has to be bent. You can't get something for nothing. Improve one thing at the expense of something else - always ! You are right Dirac has to ring more (it bends more) and it is probably also not oversampling.
Sonarworx didnt propably affect so much after your manual tweaks. Did it or did it not ? How about you show the curves ?
What about ARC3 IK Multimedia?
Would be interesting to compare it to Neumann's DSP system. Using a track by Darude of course.
I have to disagree with you on this one! I've tried both Sonarworks and Dirac live on my Focal SM9's and the difference is huge... Sonarworks really seems to remove a lot of definition from the sound and somehow it sounds a bit plastic. Dirac on the other hand really improves the stereo field and clarity. But I agree on the Sonarworks design and usage, it's definitely great and their usage for headphones is awesome, use it on my HD 650's! Great vid and cheers from the Netherlands! ;)
Heres one that sounds better than either option if youre willing to go the extra mile.. REW>Sweep>Generate EQ Filters>Soundsource>CraveEQ2+Input filters enjoy ring-free transient rich lows, and linear phase highs! Voila.
If you're using a sub, here's another trick. Use audiohijack instead of soundsource.
Create two outputs, 1 for sub, 1 for mains. Insert voxengo time delay before mains, after sub. Sweep in REW, and time align the mains to the sub. Once dips are resolved and crossover is filled in, then sweep and apply correction eq as stated above before both the sub and mains.
It's a bit much to explain but if you're already elbows deep, you'll understand ;)
Enjoy!
Sonarworks actually made me feel sick, something with phase. I do use the HEDD lineariser all the time now. Nice ridiculous speakers, what are they?
I expect that both Sonarworks and Dirac Live will significantly improve the listening results as the before correction measured response in this video looks really very weird but...measuring the filter response isn't appropriate since Dirac Live applies a "pre emphasis", you should measure the impulse response in your studio instead. Also, the removal of a high-frequency peak is being perceived as lack of details but that's not the case (it's just more neutral)
Sonarworks is a life saver
if you are using RME *like me then you have a choise to put 3band eq on the master fader, since i have treated my room a lot, i can live with only 3 bands, and the sound is more pleasant then sonarworks, i just dont like the sound of those filters..
are those PMC monitors?
Nope
neat product, but imo if ur smart enough with REW, you can just export REW's EQ-filters impulse response into any IR-reverb processor that can import .wav files like ReaVerb. done, and for free... although you'll need a calibration mic....
how about trinnov?
I had a KRK Ergo Room Correction for over 10 years. It was a great Monitor Controller but it has latency. Thhe Correction of the Room was always a great mess. It cleans up a bit the mid and highs but to be fair - turn it off was not such a great lose then you would suspekt to buy 500€ on it. Perhaps thats the thing KRK doesnt have the device listet anymore, not even for drivers or just product History. Seems to me they want to forget that part of their product history. Today i have a Drawmer MC3.1 Monitor Controler and it such a win. No Latency and such a rich funktionality. Mixing with or without my Ergo was something - i cant tell the difference even on other speakers. The biggest key for a better sound was to invest in professional Basstraps. THAT was a huge positve impakt in soundquality. But i do have some problems with high and Mid in that Room.. but it doesnt Matter for my mixing. My Adams A7x are great Monitor Speakers and they do such a great job in Nearfield that i can switch between my Speakers and Headphones and always have a close Sound. When it sounds good on the Adams it will do on all other speakers too. Mastering? I wont recomend it but it is possible to do some Quick and dirty Mastering. Thats good enough but not for Pro cases.
The biggest + for KRK Ergo was, that it was DSP powerd that was realy nice. But it pay off with latency.. like always in the digital domain. And yes it comes with a Room Mic that is actualy realy a good mic. It could be a thing doing a messurement and just using an EQ on the masterbus to correct some dips or peaks save as room preset and good is.. way cheaper and works too. So nowdays i dont get the point paying for room correction. Correct a Room doenst mean that the result will sound better. Just have a flat response.
My thought when first seeing this sort of thing was this: The issue is the room not the signal before it comes out into the room… a boost or cut doesn’t fix the reflection creating it… because once done there’ll be a whole new slightly off frequency response…. The concept I find a bit digital minded and not organic as a room is
I think when I get setup I might give it a go to check my doubts… but only if they create a monitor controller… it’s pointless if it’s only to be on the master bus in a DAW… I only really would see use for myself if I had a travelling setup
problem with all those dsp corrections is that if you move your head just 10cm it will do more harm then good… that said, I use GLM for my genelecs but its mostly just cutting some freqencies that are too loud.. most people have problem with bass reverb and no amount of dsp can fix that
The problem with this way of thinking is that acoustics cause artifacts in two axes: amplitude and time. You can correct the amplitude axis, but you still have the problems in the time axis. But here's the important thing: correcting one is way way better than correcting none! :)
@@MFKitten thats why its still much better to invest in some DIY panels and bass traps and treat the problem at its source… probably cheeper also… other thing, everybody keeps forgeting there is this thing called psychoacoustics and that its more important to get used to your hearing/room/monitors then a flat response curve
@@TomislavRupic this was the word missing from my point “psychoacoustics” and the point about reverb… because even if it made it flat it’ll be a flatter signal still with reverb… my other point would be how eq works also… if you boss a bass frequency it effects the rest of the mix… so if the eq changes it’ll just have a contrasting effect elsewhere in the frequencies… so many variables making this a hard one to grasp as a viable idea… it’s a good concept definitely but seems to fall short much like emulating the acoustics of a famous studio in headphones… good music was made in those rooms because the people in them have been in them for years and know the room and speakers… it’s more the people than the room… then also it’s all the other equipment in the room… it’ll be like trying to make your home kitchen better by emulating the acoustics of a famous kitchen… when I first saw the KRK ERGO when I had limited knowledge and a lot of learned misconceptions from nonsense passed around about music production I thought “this thing could be the key” lol… it was a key to profit for a company and that’s about it haha
Would be cool to see these vs REW
Super weird the 12db boost on the highs. Sonarworks almost never corrects highs that much. I think something on your monitors/system was messing this correction apps.
I’m still investigating this…
@@Whiteseastudio Great. If you find something, please update us. I've seen a good amount of SW corrections and they almost always corrects a lot on the bass, low-mid frequencies and almost nothing on the highest frequencies.
It's also a question of the curve you set as goal, flat isn't always, i would say even at all, the best way, maybe, flat between certain frequencies is the way to go, while consider your room acoustic - it's really not an easy task
@@Whiteseastudio I have found that with Sonarworks, the distance from the speakers, as well as the height that you measure at can have a massive difference. If you move your listening position back 8-12 inches the measurement can be dramatically different. If you have it closer to tweeter height than cone height, and it can make a big difference too.
I tend to do 2 or 3 measurements with slightly different listening spots and heights to see how it changes the results. I also take the arm off a mic stand and hold that at arms length so that my body isn't effecting the mic measurement as much.
@@Whiteseastudio Thanks for the video, very insightful. You have a very unusual speaker compared to standard 2 way. Which might have an impact on measurement or how the software processes. Also I was wondering if you have tried changing the dry wet amount? I set mine to 25% for casual listening and about 30% for critical listening. I can hear more detail without hearing the filter as much. There is also a Linear Phase setting which made a small improvement for me. I use headphones RME Babyface fs interface and LCD-X. I prefer playback without sonarworks on an everyday basis but I can hear improvement when used. Kind regards,
How about an IK ARC review?
IK Multimedia Arc is far to superior to both of these. Extensively demoed ALL and Arc is by far the most practical (easy plugin) on system out and natural sounding.
sonarworks reference user, have not upgraded to SoundID. Near 8 min mark in video you mention that SoundID stopped doing its work at high end while other Dirac flattened it out to top of specturm. You said you killed the SoundID processing above 6k (wondering how you did that actually). That would mean that all that high end added to correct it (that bothered you) wouldn't be present. It seemed like SoundIDs push in high end above 10k (graphic shown earlier in video) looked amazing like the mirror to the dip above 10k in the REW comparison graph. Might have something to do with the diff. Not saying SoundID didn't have an issue in high end, but that dip in REW comparison without compensation from SoundID above 6k could probably be expected.
These microphones really look like my cooker lighter. Not great for sound, but it's FIRE!! 😉
Started 10 years ago with mini DSP DA22 with dirac live. The DA began to sound a bit less pristine so switched to dirac live ITB and that works even better. Sonarworks gave me a microphone and free upgrade from headphone calibration to speakers. The software improved but without impulse response correction sonarworks does not perform better. I don't understand Wietse dirac is better and quality should be key.
@White Sea Studio: It would be great to see the video: Genelec GLM Calibration software vs SoundID
I know sonarworks recommends holding the mic but record soomething with that mic and handling noise is bad ... soooo i use a mic stand AND ther is on and off axis response... i know in thery it is a omni mic but this is never a perfect sphere ... so my recommendation is the beyerdynamic mm1 they send you a calibration file for on axis and off axis 90°. Then you can move the mic evenly while pointing it to the ceiling. Both speakers have in this technique the same angle ... works simply better
... btw. sound id has new modes that let you choose how much of the highs and lows are compensated (agressive is the setting you need if you want to extend that correction curve) NExt to that the new version also offers a eq to make the corrected sound fit to your taste
conclusion: practice a lot with your monitors, get used to their sound, know how your monitors behave.
How about testing them on some of your work, a real life scenario review - is that something you are going to do?
Please do a Trinnov ST2 review!
Thanks for saving me money. 🙂
Changing the EQ with materials ? Maybe a basstrap, but i think most basstraps are just symbolic items to show others that you have understanding about .....hahaha. Room EQ is a must by the way, but its not about the room but about your speakers ! Most people are adjusting eq towards the sound of their speakers and thats a big mistake. Just look at your own measurement, the bumps are more then 3db and thats adjustable for ears with ease.
Worth noting sonarworks doesn’t work with windows 11 ( for now at least)
Suggestion: if you have measured your room you can take proQ3 and eq the frequency areas you want for instance 30-200hz. So you keep your mids and highs untouched.
lets be real. there is no flat. modes, flutter echos and first reflections suck and need to be treated but besides that it's always personal taste. 20 engineers will pick 20 different perceived "flat"s when asked which speaker in which room etc.
Happy user of SW Reference 4, and sticking to it as long as possible since the Sound ID version seems to be riddled with bugs (a sad reality for a colleague of mine). This is really the type of product you should try before you buy, if you have a friend with either of these and a measurement mic, invite them for coffee to your studio/bedroom and see for yourself what it does with your setup. Many things can go wrong. Personally another big value besides room correction itself, is the equalization of freq. response between my monitors and headphones (although of course, they can never be truly equal, given room reverb and stereo positioning). I get more consistency / less difference when switching between these two, and mixing at home, I have to switch quite often. I can do a mix on headphones and know it will translate at least 75% on my monitors as well, and vice versa. Also I'm using SW systemwide ALWAYS no matter what I listen to, in order to train my ears to a certain consistent freq. response, even if it's not truly flat (and it never really is, you can only approach the flatness but never reach it, consistency is more important than actual flatness).
I would have to second that. I am an extremely happy user of SW Reference 4. I have not used Sound ID as I am happy with the results I get using Reference 4. I also have purchased headphones which were calibrated by Sonarworks. Hands down the best investments I have ever made. Kind of bummed to know that Sound ID is buggy, Ref 4 is amazing.
Sonarworks is just too slow..also the systemwide extension is intrusive and cumbersome...and don't ask me how often i accidentally rendered the correction curve into the bounce.
A dedicated DSP box is by far the better solution if you decide to go down the room correction route.
Merging Anubis is such a product that utilizes the correction curve perfectly.
But even UAD and a curve EQ with an approximation will do.
My perfect solution would be a UAD plugin that can load the calibration file though.
What happened with your Dutch&Dutch?
IK Multimedia ARC-3 !!! :)
Try Trinnov. It's the only thing that corrects the time domen.