Funny how Taiwan dares to lecture the PRC on "democracy", when they were literally a dictatorship till the 90-s, that slaughtered their island's native population, and imprisoned and executed every normal person they suspected to be a "communist" simply cuz he dared to think about a normal 8 hour work day, and not living in a sweatshop. As for Tianmen square, i seriously doubt the majority of the protests were Maoist in nature. Deng's reforms started 10 years earlier, so it doesn't make sense why people's unrest would wait for 1989 - which by "total coincidence" is the same year as the "color revolutions" in Eastern Europe. What's more likely is some maoists simply joined the western funded demonstrations, hoping they can take em over.
Yes his reform started 10 years before that, but he did not implement price liberalisation shortly before Tiananmen square. This cause inflation and made government worker and other professions with fixed wages unable to afford goods. Once again as I have stated, the reason this is a liberal protest is because they are trying to appeal to the international community for support. Then the Eastern European countries starts mimicking China. I believe the CIA simply took this opportunity and shaped that into a liberal movement.
Through all of Deng's reforms and even today the bourgeois class stayed subordinated to the Communist Party which represents the the working class and strives for communism. The reforms helped China be competitive and strong. It is unreasonable to support Xi without supporting what led China to the position where he found it, that is without supporting Deng, just as it is unreasonable to support Deng without supporting Mao. Without Deng China would have fell just as the Soviet Union did.
To some degree reforms might be necessary to improve the economic power of China, but once again he was planning a much more market oriented reform which he backtracked after Tiananmen square. The Soviet Union collapsed primarily because of the radical reforms carried out by Gorbachev. China could most likely achieve similar result with more moderate reforms. That would have prevented the Tiananmen Square protest from ever happening. Besides there are also internal faction within the Chinese Communist Party, Xi is certainly not in the same faction as the liberals which supports intraparty democracy. Therefore if you side with the conservative faction of that party, it will be reasonable to support Xi without supporting Deng or any of the liberal faction members
cover more about Dugin & why Modern Liberal Academics are the enemy & must be opposed. or make a political ideology tier list those are easy to make, obviously ranked by what is the most positive outcome for a nation or humanity overall, etc.
![ハルピン旅愁(Journey to Harbin/Harupin Ryosho/Харбинское Путешествие) - Taro Shoji [Eng/Rus/Jap Subtitle]](/img/1.gif)
Funny how Taiwan dares to lecture the PRC on "democracy", when they were literally a dictatorship till the 90-s, that slaughtered their island's native population, and imprisoned and executed every normal person they suspected to be a "communist" simply cuz he dared to think about a normal 8 hour work day, and not living in a sweatshop. As for Tianmen square, i seriously doubt the majority of the protests were Maoist in nature. Deng's reforms started 10 years earlier, so it doesn't make sense why people's unrest would wait for 1989 - which by "total coincidence" is the same year as the "color revolutions" in Eastern Europe. What's more likely is some maoists simply joined the western funded demonstrations, hoping they can take em over.
Yes his reform started 10 years before that, but he did not implement price liberalisation shortly before Tiananmen square. This cause inflation and made government worker and other professions with fixed wages unable to afford goods.
Once again as I have stated, the reason this is a liberal protest is because they are trying to appeal to the international community for support. Then the Eastern European countries starts mimicking China. I believe the CIA simply took this opportunity and shaped that into a liberal movement.
Through all of Deng's reforms and even today the bourgeois class stayed subordinated to the Communist Party which represents the the working class and strives for communism. The reforms helped China be competitive and strong. It is unreasonable to support Xi without supporting what led China to the position where he found it, that is without supporting Deng, just as it is unreasonable to support Deng without supporting Mao. Without Deng China would have fell just as the Soviet Union did.
To some degree reforms might be necessary to improve the economic power of China, but once again he was planning a much more market oriented reform which he backtracked after Tiananmen square. The Soviet Union collapsed primarily because of the radical reforms carried out by Gorbachev. China could most likely achieve similar result with more moderate reforms. That would have prevented the Tiananmen Square protest from ever happening.
Besides there are also internal faction within the Chinese Communist Party, Xi is certainly not in the same faction as the liberals which supports intraparty democracy. Therefore if you side with the conservative faction of that party, it will be reasonable to support Xi without supporting Deng or any of the liberal faction members
@@NovajaPravda What ways was the collapse of the USSR gorbachevs reforms?
The music is too loud
cover more about Dugin & why Modern Liberal Academics are the enemy & must be opposed.
or make a political ideology tier list those are easy to make, obviously ranked by what is the most positive outcome for a nation or humanity overall, etc.
make the music louder, we can almost hear you
background music is too loud... hard to understand your voice
Turn on the subtitles, that should help. But I will try to make the background music more quiet next time
The background music is too loud
it aint that loud
Try turning on the auto generated captions, it's not 100% accurate but it should help