I like the vibes but this is pseudomysticism and way less clever than you think. You are young and you are exploring some of the most beutiful ideas in science, but right now you are taking the path of a history channel narrative. This is the wrong path.
True but it also gets some stuff right, brings up things that we don't know the answer to yet, and has a nice message so I like it (as long as Max isn't spewing unresearched or incorrect info intentionally and acknowledges to himself that he can improve)
I can't believe how can this video be so good and yet have only a few views. The editing, the theme... It also looks like youtube is promoting you. I got your video recommended. Will you remember me when you become one of the main science channels?
I've been thinking about this and I have a hipothesis that would proof that there is an actual limit to how fast you can run a mile, not even with infinite hours of training would you be able to run faster than light. Proof me wrong :D
Hi, I enjoyed your video from an editing perspective, as it was really quite nice to watch aesthetically speaking. But I suggest in the future, if you plan to make more videos like this, perhaps explain your points further, like, for example, citing studies? In the case of "Exponential learning" in particular. I have another critique, too, with what you specifically said at the start, to do with anything being achievable, and sure, in a lot of cases that is true. But if I was to say try to run at the speed of light, that is just not possible, down to the fact that I have mass and the speed of light is the speed an object travels at (in a vacuum if we take c = 3x10^8) when it has no mass. So, in order to do that, I would have to completely transform my mass into light; hence, I wouldn't be able to run at that speed. Finally, just because things have fine detail doesn't mean they have infinitely fine detail, which I imagine (I may be wrong) that physicists stay away from the term fractal when describing geometry within our universe, partially because fractals themselves are a very mathematical thing that only exist (at least in their purest form) in a mathematical sense. But of course, fractal-like things exist, and only at relatively small scales, like fungi, for example, which looks very similar geometrically speaking but misses the self-similar properties of a fractal at small enough scales, so it's really a fractal by definition. However, I don't disagree a significant quantity of physical behavior looks fractal-like at first glance, but that's down to the general symmetries at large scales. Though there is a theory in physical cosmology that is somewhat similar to what you are positing, which suggests that matter is distributed in a fractal-like manner (i.e. the structure of the universe itself is a fractal across a wide range of scales). Anyway, who knows, maybe I am just an idiot on the internet who thinks he knows best, but I wish you all the best :)
I like the vibes but this is pseudomysticism and way less clever than you think. You are young and you are exploring some of the most beutiful ideas in science, but right now you are taking the path of a history channel narrative. This is the wrong path.
This video gets basically everything wrong.
True but it also gets some stuff right, brings up things that we don't know the answer to yet, and has a nice message so I like it (as long as Max isn't spewing unresearched or incorrect info intentionally and acknowledges to himself that he can improve)
what did he get wrong, i cant really tell because im not that well versed in this area of stuff.
When intellectual, observant, and investigative people drop decent LSD.
I didn't expect to get so pumped watching this. Nice work
Good video edit and fine description 👍
this is one of the most beautifull videos i have ever watched
Thanks!
I can't believe how can this video be so good and yet have only a few views. The editing, the theme... It also looks like youtube is promoting you. I got your video recommended. Will you remember me when you become one of the main science channels?
I've been thinking about this and I have a hipothesis that would proof that there is an actual limit to how fast you can run a mile, not even with infinite hours of training would you be able to run faster than light. Proof me wrong :D
Z+z^2=c is one of my favorite fractols
Go down the rabbit hole with Fractal theory and apply it to the stock market, then hit me back.
Hi, I enjoyed your video from an editing perspective, as it was really quite nice to watch aesthetically speaking. But I suggest in the future, if you plan to make more videos like this, perhaps explain your points further, like, for example, citing studies? In the case of "Exponential learning" in particular. I have another critique, too, with what you specifically said at the start, to do with anything being achievable, and sure, in a lot of cases that is true. But if I was to say try to run at the speed of light, that is just not possible, down to the fact that I have mass and the speed of light is the speed an object travels at (in a vacuum if we take c = 3x10^8) when it has no mass. So, in order to do that, I would have to completely transform my mass into light; hence, I wouldn't be able to run at that speed. Finally, just because things have fine detail doesn't mean they have infinitely fine detail, which I imagine (I may be wrong) that physicists stay away from the term fractal when describing geometry within our universe, partially because fractals themselves are a very mathematical thing that only exist (at least in their purest form) in a mathematical sense. But of course, fractal-like things exist, and only at relatively small scales, like fungi, for example, which looks very similar geometrically speaking but misses the self-similar properties of a fractal at small enough scales, so it's really a fractal by definition. However, I don't disagree a significant quantity of physical behavior looks fractal-like at first glance, but that's down to the general symmetries at large scales. Though there is a theory in physical cosmology that is somewhat similar to what you are positing, which suggests that matter is distributed in a fractal-like manner (i.e. the structure of the universe itself is a fractal across a wide range of scales). Anyway, who knows, maybe I am just an idiot on the internet who thinks he knows best, but I wish you all the best :)
Side note: I really like the message of being the best you, you can possibly be.
Btw i am from India so if you want views get information about maths more complex and speak truth not like essay just, feel the video when you record
how does this video not have like a million views?
Needs wait 9.2 years lol
bcz this guy is smoking crack