Reading about the 57mm AA makes me think they are overpowered in Warno, as they weren't historically seen as effective AA vs fast jets. Right now I feel they are one of the most effective AA units in the game. Also, lmao @ turdburglar 69.
Yeah, there's this weird thing in WARNO/Wargame where radar-guidance is just a hindrance (making the vehicle vulnerable to SEAD). The capabilities of Soviet AA cannons are also vastly overstated considering they would be super innacurate even before considering if they find the correct aim. I guess it has to do with the game not taking into account things like angle of approach & range-based accuracy. Also, that's not mentioning that, realistically, NATO aircraft would be flying higher and usually out of effective range of cannon-based AA.
They aren't as effective against jets but they do roughly 3 damage per hit and fire very quickly. They absolutely are the most deadly against helos for sure though. If you fly a helo within its shorter range that helo is dead without a doubt.
That entire mountain was on fire at one point. Does all the napalm and artillery fire actually remove the forest it impacted from play? Like actually remove it's cover modifier?
will they ever add deck building to this game? or do we not need deck building for this game to make it as good as the wargame series? im not sure if i like only premade decks..
@@VulcanHDGaming do you have a video explaining this in more detail? division sound like already highly specialized and limited customizing options to me.
@@VulcanHDGaming thank you. looks like the division system means they can mix/match units from diffrent countries but we are not able to build a deck with all of our favorite units from one country at least. maybe this is easier to balance for them. lets hope they add plenty of diffrent divisions then.
@@FalconDS9 technically the game provides you with what they call “official decks” so yes the game does come with pre made decks but they’re usually not very well thought out so it’s better to build your own.
The french para infantry is so nasty. Look out for a price nerf! On a side note it does seem that as they've added more divs and unit types since initial launch some of the logic about infantry unit size vs. transport size has gotten a little loose. For instance if you can fit 14 KDA schutzen into a single SPW, why does a Marder or Bradley only hold 5 guys? A Unimog can carry as many as 11 jagers, so why are fs-jagers limited to just 8 in the same transport? All of the french paras infantry use the same VLRA transport, so why can't they all have the same amount of guys? The smaller 2x aplias squads become very price-inefficient given the overhead required to bring in a VLRA that could carry 4 more guys in it. If a unit is smaller it should take a smaller and cheaper transport.
This time around, Eugen has stayed largely true to transport capacity and standard unit size amongst the various factions. The SPW-152 can carry 14 troops because, well, that's how many troops it could carry in real life. The Bradley and Marder are IFVs, not APCs, so their troop capacity is smaller due to their integrated weapons systems taking up cargo space. Gone are the days of the Wargame "Clown Cars", where you had 10-man squads popping out of jeeps and tiny Mi-2 helicopters. ;) Squad sizes are also more loyal to their real-world doctrinal strength rather than Wargame's old, arbitrary 5/10/15-man teams for every single nation in-game. Jager squads were usually organized into teams of 10-12 soldiers; Fallschirmjager teams usually consisted of 6-8 soldiers. Also, I'd argue that the APILAS squads are VERY cost-efficient given that they can quickly take out numerous Soviet tanks costing upwards of 300 points each.
@@NixodCreations "Going to war without the French, is like going to war without your accordion." - This quote could have been said by any number of opponents / Allies over many centuries. They're already bailing on NATO over nukes and Russia. Watch them run this winter when they get a little uncomfortable.
@@markborreson You double down on stupid neo con era french ''jokes'' jeez pretending to be bloody historical ones... yeah, George Washington said that in Yorktown before the battle you think ?... you are not even worth any serious reply...
Always love the warno content
Then again I enjoy your content in general so:)
Reading about the 57mm AA makes me think they are overpowered in Warno, as they weren't historically seen as effective AA vs fast jets. Right now I feel they are one of the most effective AA units in the game.
Also, lmao @ turdburglar 69.
Yeah, there's this weird thing in WARNO/Wargame where radar-guidance is just a hindrance (making the vehicle vulnerable to SEAD). The capabilities of Soviet AA cannons are also vastly overstated considering they would be super innacurate even before considering if they find the correct aim.
I guess it has to do with the game not taking into account things like angle of approach & range-based accuracy.
Also, that's not mentioning that, realistically, NATO aircraft would be flying higher and usually out of effective range of cannon-based AA.
They aren't as effective against jets but they do roughly 3 damage per hit and fire very quickly. They absolutely are the most deadly against helos for sure though. If you fly a helo within its shorter range that helo is dead without a doubt.
Damn the enemy capped fast, was up to a +8 for quite a bit there.
That entire mountain was on fire at one point. Does all the napalm and artillery fire actually remove the forest it impacted from play? Like actually remove it's cover modifier?
Nope, just looks different afterward.
@@VulcanHDGaming Ah, that's a shame. Would be a pretty cool mechanic.
@@Agora2021 is it VERY hard to burn a forest down so much it no longer exists
@@EAfirstlast Except for when it's under constant napalm and artillery bombardment.
@@Agora2021 lmao
GG, when is full release ?
will they ever add deck building to this game? or do we not need deck building for this game to make it as good as the wargame series? im not sure if i like only premade decks..
Decks aren't pre made. You can create and customise your own decks based on certain divisions.
@@VulcanHDGaming do you have a video explaining this in more detail? division sound like already highly specialized and limited customizing options to me.
You can watch any of my deck preview videos to see how it works. Here is the latest: ruclips.net/video/BhpOhuT8am4/видео.html
@@VulcanHDGaming thank you. looks like the division system means they can mix/match units from diffrent countries but we are not able to build a deck with all of our favorite units from one country at least. maybe this is easier to balance for them. lets hope they add plenty of diffrent divisions then.
@@FalconDS9 technically the game provides you with what they call “official decks” so yes the game does come with pre made decks but they’re usually not very well thought out so it’s better to build your own.
The french para infantry is so nasty. Look out for a price nerf! On a side note it does seem that as they've added more divs and unit types since initial launch some of the logic about infantry unit size vs. transport size has gotten a little loose. For instance if you can fit 14 KDA schutzen into a single SPW, why does a Marder or Bradley only hold 5 guys? A Unimog can carry as many as 11 jagers, so why are fs-jagers limited to just 8 in the same transport? All of the french paras infantry use the same VLRA transport, so why can't they all have the same amount of guys? The smaller 2x aplias squads become very price-inefficient given the overhead required to bring in a VLRA that could carry 4 more guys in it. If a unit is smaller it should take a smaller and cheaper transport.
This time around, Eugen has stayed largely true to transport capacity and standard unit size amongst the various factions. The SPW-152 can carry 14 troops because, well, that's how many troops it could carry in real life. The Bradley and Marder are IFVs, not APCs, so their troop capacity is smaller due to their integrated weapons systems taking up cargo space. Gone are the days of the Wargame "Clown Cars", where you had 10-man squads popping out of jeeps and tiny Mi-2 helicopters. ;)
Squad sizes are also more loyal to their real-world doctrinal strength rather than Wargame's old, arbitrary 5/10/15-man teams for every single nation in-game. Jager squads were usually organized into teams of 10-12 soldiers; Fallschirmjager teams usually consisted of 6-8 soldiers.
Also, I'd argue that the APILAS squads are VERY cost-efficient given that they can quickly take out numerous Soviet tanks costing upwards of 300 points each.
First
Second.
I've seen a few warno games and I don't see the difference between red dragon and this, the changes are so small its not worth even buying.
you are clearly not paying enough attention, once you actually play it you see the difference
The "best" French infantry? So, what? Too bad, there isn't a feature where the French have to make a periodic die roll to not spontaneously surrender.
2003 called, they want their joke back
@@NixodCreations "Going to war without the French, is like going to war without your accordion." - This quote could have been said by any number of opponents / Allies over many centuries. They're already bailing on NATO over nukes and Russia. Watch them run this winter when they get a little uncomfortable.
@@markborreson you talk like a middle schooler
@@The_Faceless_No_Name_Stranger That's because he is most likely a middle schooler, dont give him too much attention
@@markborreson You double down on stupid neo con era french ''jokes'' jeez pretending to be bloody historical ones... yeah, George Washington said that in Yorktown before the battle you think ?... you are not even worth any serious reply...