@@TheDiecastFanatic I think the precise sense of volume, proportion, and shape of CMC model adds much more realism to the model. It is incomparable to the AUTOart version.
@@TheDiecastFanatic AUTOart models nowadays definitely is overpriced. I miss good old days when their models had reasonable price. Right before the Signature line came up...
Looking at the two models of the porche there isnt much difference between the two but to me the dark blue looks the best, with better shut lines around the doors and the interior looks better, looking from the front of the car the dark blue car has better chrome trim around the front window screen.
Frankly, the two models may be superior to CMC in many things, but Auto Art is not bad. What is strange is that there are beautiful cars that were not manufactured by the two companies, such as American cars, especially muscle cars, and there is an exaggeration in their prices on top of the prices of other companies, whose prices have become constantly rising. Thanks
In my opinion, the AUTOart has the more scale in terms of finesse, shut lines, window frame size and other details because of the plastic used has been injection moulded more precisely. But the CMC has much more detail, and depth, and looks like a museum piece that would amaze and impress any modeller. So for me, it's the CMC because if I had it on my desk, I would spend more time exploring and enjoying all of those exquisite details, the real leather, the suspension and engine details, the wheels, and all that depth and richness. Wonderful video and thank you for making and sharing.
I think, it’s a draw because cmc has some really good interior, but, for example, the wipers on autoart version look a bit more realistic. Interior: cmc, outside: autoart, for these two. Both amazing
@@humayunmirza6835 Exactly, if your not rich it all depends on the price, and second to this exactly what yo say. I have 2 CMC versions, just to get that mat in front trunk out and revealing a detail that autoart doesn't have, makes you feel you have a more expensive piece. For realisme from a distance or to take pictures with effects so you think its a real one, then mostly Autoart for that I think, becaus of finer shutlines and smoother lines overall. Auoart - CMC - Exoto - Franklin Mint (the reason like CMC but older models where 1/24 was the new scale) are my favorite model brands to own, GT spirit and those resin things, bwa you look them once with an eyeblink and your done with it, looks sometimes nice in the bright light behind glass - but their its stops.. and I always want to push on windows - with resin it breaks deforms or get loose I hate it
@@TheDiecastFanatic LOl hahahah would be great to put them in real car categorie and then say after that you mistaken of categorie while you answered alot of question to people that want to buy the real one. And for mileage - you can say 'mmmm 1meter , ..maybe 1,5m, why that question? Rubber tyre are in mint condition like you can see on the pictures , ..I don't hide anything' ;)
AUTOart hands down. Unfortunately, I never knew which one I was looking at without a legend pointing out the brand. Just the hood line on the AUTOart compared to the CMC is enough sell for me. Plus, CMC seems to have an aversion to putting engines in their models.
CMC has more complete details on both the engine and the trunk, but in everything else, Autoart surpasses it, both in each piece of chrome and in the molding and wheels. We cannot get carried away by the "brand".
@@markamd1 I respect your opinion, but like many, you get carried away by the brand and its pedigree. For collectors who know what we are looking for, the overall detail is important, and the newer the model, the more the technology takes us to those levels of precision. Fact.
Wow... The precise reflection quality on the CMC model is on another level!
They really focus on the little details!
@@TheDiecastFanatic I think the precise sense of volume, proportion, and shape of CMC model adds much more realism to the model.
It is incomparable to the AUTOart version.
@@YoonELEC I agree. To me it’s funny how the AUTOart model is almost as expensive as the CMC ones on Ebay.
@@TheDiecastFanatic AUTOart models nowadays definitely is overpriced. I miss good old days when their models had reasonable price. Right before the Signature line came up...
@@YoonELEC true, sadly those days are long over..
Amazing models 😃
Autoart for aestethics and proportions and cmc for opening features and details
Yes. And this makes a hard decision...
Nice models great value too👍👍👍
gooood!!!!likee!!
Looking at the two models of the porche there isnt much difference between the two but to me the dark blue looks the best, with better shut lines around the doors and the interior looks better, looking from the front of the car the dark blue car has better chrome trim around the front window screen.
Great casting 😊 new sub here 😃👌
Frankly, the two models may be superior to CMC in many things, but Auto Art is not bad. What is strange is that there are beautiful cars that were not manufactured by the two companies, such as American cars, especially muscle cars, and there is an exaggeration in their prices on top of the prices of other companies, whose prices have become constantly rising.
Thanks
Who’s the winner?
In my opinion, the AUTOart has the more scale in terms of finesse, shut lines, window frame size and other details because of the plastic used has been injection moulded more precisely. But the CMC has much more detail, and depth, and looks like a museum piece that would amaze and impress any modeller. So for me, it's the CMC because if I had it on my desk, I would spend more time exploring and enjoying all of those exquisite details, the real leather, the suspension and engine details, the wheels, and all that depth and richness. Wonderful video and thank you for making and sharing.
I think, it’s a draw because cmc has some really good interior, but, for example, the wipers on autoart version look a bit more realistic.
Interior: cmc, outside: autoart, for these two. Both amazing
@@humayunmirza6835 Exactly, if your not rich it all depends on the price, and second to this exactly what yo say. I have 2 CMC versions, just to get that mat in front trunk out and revealing a detail that autoart doesn't have, makes you feel you have a more expensive piece. For realisme from a distance or to take pictures with effects so you think its a real one, then mostly Autoart for that I think, becaus of finer shutlines and smoother lines overall. Auoart - CMC - Exoto - Franklin Mint (the reason like CMC but older models where 1/24 was the new scale) are my favorite model brands to own, GT spirit and those resin things, bwa you look them once with an eyeblink and your done with it, looks sometimes nice in the bright light behind glass - but their its stops.. and I always want to push on windows - with resin it breaks deforms or get loose I hate it
👀
As you put the camera low. They look like real cars🤣
Sometimes when i sell my models on marketplace people think they are real when they ask for mileage, oil change, etc.. 🤣
@@TheDiecastFanatic LOl hahahah would be great to put them in real car categorie and then say after that you mistaken of categorie while you answered alot of question to people that want to buy the real one. And for mileage - you can say 'mmmm 1meter , ..maybe 1,5m, why that question? Rubber tyre are in mint condition like you can see on the pictures , ..I don't hide anything' ;)
AUTOart hands down. Unfortunately, I never knew which one I was looking at without a legend pointing out the brand. Just the hood line on the AUTOart compared to the CMC is enough sell for me. Plus, CMC seems to have an aversion to putting engines in their models.
Auto Art is Junk compared to CMC.
Totally not, its different. Jewelry vs presentation of the real car
CMC has more complete details on both the engine and the trunk, but in everything else, Autoart surpasses it, both in each piece of chrome and in the molding and wheels. We cannot get carried away by the "brand".
@@thecsr2944 Autoart is a toy compared to CMC nothing to do with the "Brand"
@@Shitinthemorning Autoart is junk
@@markamd1 I respect your opinion, but like many, you get carried away by the brand and its pedigree. For collectors who know what we are looking for, the overall detail is important, and the newer the model, the more the technology takes us to those levels of precision. Fact.