Bible and Archaeology Discussions Israel Finkelstein & Thomas Römer: Episode 1 - Khirbet Qeiyafa
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 сен 2024
- In the Smunis Family Foundation Bible and Archaeology Discussions, Israel Finkelstein, Professor of archaeology at Tel Aviv University, and Thomas Römer, Professor of Hebrew Bible in the Collège de France in Paris, visit archaeological sites in Israel, attempting to bridge between the results of archaeological research and the biblical text by taking a critical look at both disciplines.
In this episode, Finkelstein and Römer discuss the archaeological site of Khirbet Qeiyfa southeast of Jerusalem: its finds, date, territorial affiliation, and possible connection to the biblical materials on Kings David and Saul, including the duel between David and Goliath.
Excellent clip. It is fascinating to see Finkelstein and Römer together. Their presence on the site adds a lot to the content value.
I love love love this. Thank you so much!
Interesting and wonderful 💖
Seems strange to have this debate without the excavator Yossi Garfinkel present, who disagrees strongly with Finkelstein about the interpretation of this site.
Thomas Römer excelente 👏
excellent clip. only remark regarding the end- what was the complexity? its not very clear. was there an egyptian threat on judah at the time the text was written? the egyptians and greeks cooperated against judah?
נהדר
nice
does the channel owner have a video about the fact of Jesus' death using a cross or a stake?
sorry, no.
To discount, the accuracy of the biblical account, is to call the authors of those accounts, either liars or lunatics.
For decades, Bible critics proclaimed. There was no such thing as the Hittite Empire, until 1906 when A shepherd stumbled upon it in bogus Koi turkey.
The Bible describes where the cities are, and what happened there, when scholars disagree, it’s not the Bible that looks foolish.
Would be more watchable without the pathetic music.
Music's a bit much.
Stam apekursim
These 2 are the ones that are "educating" our new generation of theologians just doing assumptions, no even hypothesis. But since those assumptions are challenging the current status quo in archeology and philology and people like "novelty" in biblical topics because it sales. This approach is no new, in fact, Masonry in the middle of the 1800's started the "study" of the Sacred Scriptures with a different approach: using the critic logic as a method and being an skeptical in the actitud.
Everything then becomes a symbol for this - that - and the other. Where do we stop? at believing that All of it was invented by the mind of man - we can't. So then it's all either bullshit or it's all true.
The ancient Israelites pretty much invented a god just for them and now can be anyone's god.
They are idiots
Israel Finkelstein's outdated view of David (as merely a village chieftain) and Solomon has been disproven by, ironically, his universityTel Aviv University''s recent research on donkey dung found in Timna near King Solomon's mines. @t
No it hasn't
A visão desatualizada do Israel Finkelstein? 😂😂😂😂😂,. Tá de sacanagem amigo?! Israel Finkelstein e um dos melhores arqueologo do momento ninguém o refutou até o momento. Israel Finkelstein Mário liverani Thomas Rōmer são os melhores. Kkkkk. Só pode está de brincadeira VC.