My opinion is absolutely worthless because I’m still terrible at this game, but I do feel like Russia has alittle bit of a unfair advantage mainly in the amount of missile slinging armored personnel carriers it can bring out. But that being said USA CAS is beastly the one deck I had 500lb bombs on the f15e (I think) and f18d at low cost as possible both between 250-300 and 2 of each. Pluss an f15ex with anti spaa missiles and 2 cruise missiles loadout. (Along with whatever lowest cost 120/aim9s it comes with) 1 f35 with the 6 glide bombs mainly for a second seed/ anti cruise missile option. Then finally a dedicated f18c with the long range 120s (whatever they’re called) and then sparrows and aim 9s to keep it cheep for air superiority. Dude if the enemy team isn’t on there AA game like to the max you I can wreck inf/light vehicles mainly with the 500lb bombs. Then use the longbow/javs for heavy’s. If I’m aloud to have the airspace it’s an easy game for me.
i feel like it really depends on how the decks are built and who youre facing but i dont disagree with you. I am definitely going to give those 500lb bombs a try!!
It's funny that the devs put vehicles in the game that the Russian army wanted to procure, but after the experience gained in the Ukraine war, no longer does because high value assets that can be knocked out just as easily as the low cost options by mines, drones and artillery, don't make any sense in a war of attrition.
@@CAS-Daddy Basically, the mass production of the whole Armata platform is in question, only the Kurganets-25 gets universally positive feedback, but I can't judge if only a single it makes logical and economical sense to massproduce only one vehicle from the whole family. The VPK-7829 Bumerang might happen, but recently, they supposedly started manufacturing a new variant of the BTR-80 with a new body and completely rearranged interior with doors in the back. Seems, like a lot of effort went into modernizing it and addressing the issues the Bumerang was supposed to. So don't know what's up with that. Lastly, there are reports about the T-80 being redesigned and its production getting restarted in a similar fashion. The problem Russia has had for decades now is that they can't put their newest tank rounds in any of their existing tank platforms because these are longer and that would require new, larger autoloaders and those wouldn't fit in the T-72/T-80/T-90 hulls. Hence, their tank gun development has lived its own life and only the Armata has received the 2A82-1M gun. In terms of penetration and velocity, this gun is supposedly the world's best, but it is a capability they haven't been able to used on the battlefield for a long time. However, there rumors about the T-80 platform getting a major overhaul so maybe it'll receive a bigger turret to house the newer gun and given how the rounds are stacked vertically in the T-80's autoloader (rather than horizontally in the T-72/T-90) in its autoloader, there might be just enough room for the rounds to be able to rotate into the gun breach. Anyway, RUclips would probably wipe this comment if I posted any links, so if you want to know more about the setback of the Armata project, google "Armata will not be" + the website en.topwar.ru, but there are more articles like that in there. I recommend using google because their built-in search engine sucks. Probably something to do with the translation.
Hi, thanks for all the replies! I have a quick question,; in Broken Arrow, do you have to pay upkeep for your units? Because in Warno you don't. Which means if you lose too many units and the discrepancy between you and your opponent becomes too big. You'll get eventually steamrolled.
@@GGpredicament so far, to my knowledge no I don’t believe you have to pay upkeep aside from the cost of supply for repairs and rearmament. Your units also have a cooldown after being lost, so the number you bring in a deck is just the total number you can field at one time not how many you get for the whole game.
Since a few patches there is an option in Warno to give a debuf to income the more units you have on the field (Selectable in the lobby options). im not 100% sure but i think you also have a similar system in BA
Is this your own deck or taken from another youtuber? If the latter please give credit where credit is due. (Because it looks very similar to one that has been posted earlier on youtube) If it's your own, please do a deck review :-) ggwp
While I have used others as inspiration I have also added my own units to fit my play style. Thanks for your comment and stopping by and at some point I will happily be reviewing my own decks.
some people have to be the good guy so try to find a problem where there is none. Even if he took my deck and played I’d still say he is a better player than me and should have it. What RUclipsr are you referring too?
@@steadyjumper3547 I greatly appreciate your comment! I try and give credit to everyone I can, and if you listen to my warno videos i call out everytime i use a deck i got from someone else. I am not stressing it in the slighest. I have put a great deal of effort and trial and error into building my decks and i have been posting them on here too and i am happy to shout out whoever he is talking about
My opinion is absolutely worthless because I’m still terrible at this game, but I do feel like Russia has alittle bit of a unfair advantage mainly in the amount of missile slinging armored personnel carriers it can bring out. But that being said USA CAS is beastly the one deck I had 500lb bombs on the f15e (I think) and f18d at low cost as possible both between 250-300 and 2 of each. Pluss an f15ex with anti spaa missiles and 2 cruise missiles loadout. (Along with whatever lowest cost 120/aim9s it comes with) 1 f35 with the 6 glide bombs mainly for a second seed/ anti cruise missile option. Then finally a dedicated f18c with the long range 120s (whatever they’re called) and then sparrows and aim 9s to keep it cheep for air superiority. Dude if the enemy team isn’t on there AA game like to the max you I can wreck inf/light vehicles mainly with the 500lb bombs. Then use the longbow/javs for heavy’s. If I’m aloud to have the airspace it’s an easy game for me.
i feel like it really depends on how the decks are built and who youre facing but i dont disagree with you. I am definitely going to give those 500lb bombs a try!!
It's funny that the devs put vehicles in the game that the Russian army wanted to procure, but after the experience gained in the Ukraine war, no longer does because high value assets that can be knocked out just as easily as the low cost options by mines, drones and artillery, don't make any sense in a war of attrition.
@@JAnx01 definitely, what vehicles are those? I’m curious to know!
@@CAS-Daddy Basically, the mass production of the whole Armata platform is in question, only the Kurganets-25 gets universally positive feedback, but I can't judge if only a single it makes logical and economical sense to massproduce only one vehicle from the whole family. The VPK-7829 Bumerang might happen, but recently, they supposedly started manufacturing a new variant of the BTR-80 with a new body and completely rearranged interior with doors in the back. Seems, like a lot of effort went into modernizing it and addressing the issues the Bumerang was supposed to. So don't know what's up with that.
Lastly, there are reports about the T-80 being redesigned and its production getting restarted in a similar fashion. The problem Russia has had for decades now is that they can't put their newest tank rounds in any of their existing tank platforms because these are longer and that would require new, larger autoloaders and those wouldn't fit in the T-72/T-80/T-90 hulls. Hence, their tank gun development has lived its own life and only the Armata has received the 2A82-1M gun. In terms of penetration and velocity, this gun is supposedly the world's best, but it is a capability they haven't been able to used on the battlefield for a long time.
However, there rumors about the T-80 platform getting a major overhaul so maybe it'll receive a bigger turret to house the newer gun and given how the rounds are stacked vertically in the T-80's autoloader (rather than horizontally in the T-72/T-90) in its autoloader, there might be just enough room for the rounds to be able to rotate into the gun breach.
Anyway, RUclips would probably wipe this comment if I posted any links, so if you want to know more about the setback of the Armata project, google "Armata will not be" + the website en.topwar.ru, but there are more articles like that in there. I recommend using google because their built-in search engine sucks. Probably something to do with the translation.
Hi, thanks for all the replies!
I have a quick question,; in Broken Arrow, do you have to pay upkeep for your units?
Because in Warno you don't. Which means if you lose too many units and the discrepancy between you and your opponent becomes too big. You'll get eventually steamrolled.
@@GGpredicament so far, to my knowledge no I don’t believe you have to pay upkeep aside from the cost of supply for repairs and rearmament. Your units also have a cooldown after being lost, so the number you bring in a deck is just the total number you can field at one time not how many you get for the whole game.
Since a few patches there is an option in Warno to give a debuf to income the more units you have on the field (Selectable in the lobby options). im not 100% sure but i think you also have a similar system in BA
The more units you have on the field the less income you get. This is to stop steam rolls
Russian gets the coolest toys
They absolutely do! That’s why we love playing as the Russians! 🇷🇺
Is this your own deck or taken from another youtuber? If the latter please give credit where credit is due. (Because it looks very similar to one that has been posted earlier on youtube) If it's your own, please do a deck review :-) ggwp
While I have used others as inspiration I have also added my own units to fit my play style. Thanks for your comment and stopping by and at some point I will happily be reviewing my own decks.
What? Its just picking units, that the game provides you. Its not like he is stealing content...
some people have to be the good guy so try to find a problem where there is none. Even if he took my deck and played I’d still say he is a better player than me and should have it. What RUclipsr are you referring too?
@@steadyjumper3547 I greatly appreciate your comment! I try and give credit to everyone I can, and if you listen to my warno videos i call out everytime i use a deck i got from someone else. I am not stressing it in the slighest. I have put a great deal of effort and trial and error into building my decks and i have been posting them on here too and i am happy to shout out whoever he is talking about
No wonder it's OP it's 5v3 game
I can only control whats in front of me
This is how I imagine an American would react when he realized that the Russians were stronger. Well then we'll go to the Russian army. Bye USA 🎉
imagine playing 5v3 and saying Russia is OP