@@svenparker бензин экологичен? хорошо сделанные дизеля это нормально а дальше уже смотря какие у тебя потребности...только не надо говорить что один двигатель лучше другого потому что он экологичнее
Golf 8 FL Variant 1.5 tsi 150 PS, 205/55R16 Nexen tires. 3,5 l/100 km @92 kph, 4,2@112, 5,8@132, 7,0@152. Displayed consumption is spot on according to distributor.
Honestly I wouldn't rely on the computer. You need to measure how many liters go into your tank when fueling up, then divide your total km by the amount. That would be most accurate. I doubt you really would get like 1lt/20km or anything close. You might very well get 1lt/16-18km.
My Rapid 2019 1.0 TSi eats just 5/100 on autobahn and i can hit the gas how much i want (ECU mod, 250nm, 105kW/140HP).. fully laden car light foot 4.6-4.8/100..
This video perfectly sums up the disaster of gasser engines. And when they say that they consume "1L more". Don't forget you will have almost 100hp with golf at everyday RPM (~2000) (but with 1.0 TSI you will drive on 20-40 hp in reality, maybe 50hp so forget max 110hp which you will never reach. Advertising trick. 9L at 160km/h LOL.
the golf 7 tdi has been bulit proof, providing your life isn't around town at city speed all the time I wouldn't recommend dute to the particulate filter being clogged but if your on a long commute in-between city's the diesel is a no brainer, I often get 62 mpg at 65mpg 590 mile range. as good as the 1.0 litre engine is its just too small and slow for everyday, I would recommend the 1.5 or 1.4 phev if your a city dweller with a charge slot on your drive, your save a fortune
@@ProBroOfficial I forgot to also mention the short life of the engine also below 100,000 miles on 1ltr many others that have done more dev major issues making them uneconomic to repair
i own 2 golf 7 one 2018 1.0 tsi 110hpwith 55000km and one 2014 2.0 tdi 150hp with 230000km and the fuel consumption are diferent that is shown here. the average on the 1.0 tsi is 7 liters on city driving and 6l on highway at 120kmh...it gets nowere near 5.3l on 120kmh...maybe downhill...and on 2.0tdi in the city i get 6.5-7.5 average(depends on trafic) and in the highway 6l at 120kmh or 6.5 liters on highway at 130-150kmh. on secondary roads, ar 80kmh i get average 4.5 liters with both cars. both cars are well maintained at every 10-12000km with nonpremium fuels.
I own a 2.0 TDI Skoda Octavia 150hp. In average 4,9 liters including city & highway. At 120kmh on long distance 4,5-4,7 liters and at 80kmh on long distance 3,5 liters/100km. Short distance quite more, depends how short. I never got more than 6 Liter at longer distances. If you Drive more than 180kmh sure, but at 120kmh never.
depends on the wheels and tires. i have a golf 1.5 and i had 16inch wheels until a month ago. now i upgraded to 18 inch with stickier rubber and my fuel consumption went up by 1l across the board with the same driving.
To add to this - I was able to drive below 4.0l/100 km (even 3.6l/100km once) with my 1.5 tsi. Its mostly driving style issue if you have high consumption with these cars.
Never Ever! The Fuel numbers on VW Dash computers are WAY OF! i drove my 1.6 TDi polo 400km, My computer Says 3,1L 100, My fuel pump tells me it was 4,3 L !!! other way around, if my Computer says 6,4 it's more like 5,7
considering that in the tdi ther's 12 degrease celsius outside in the 1.0 tfsi is 23 and this is so important for efficiency and fuel consumption, the tdi worked in cold temperature and consuming more than if it was at 23 degrease like the gasoline one.
2.0TDi is by far better engine than 1.0 but for consumption i wouldn't say that is this better in reality. My expiriance i had GTD and regular 2.0tdi PD and Common rail my father has 1.0tsi. i wouls say normal driving avarage consumption is same. But for city driving i would go for 1.0 for short driving. But thar engine is more for Polo or Fabia not for golf. Golf is for 1.5tsi and abowe
I have seat toledo with 1.0tsi. The consumption is the same as the one calculated when I fill it up. But we can not compare a diesel and a petrol one. The gearboxes are different, the diesel runs at lower rpms because of the longer gears. I manage to do 2,2l/100km with my 1.0tsi. A correct test would be to run this engines at the same rpms and see the consumption.
Don't forget that diesel will get to 2/3 of his power almost instantly (somewhere around max torque). Forget about that 110hp in 1.0 TSI. A lot of times you will drive on 20-30hp unless you will be reving it to the redline which you will not (lots of noise)
The power of the 1.0 Engine is okay above 1500rpm. It needs a lot of time to get turbo pressure. Then 200nm of torque is enough at least in the Seat Ibiza. Above 5500rpm it don’t really want to rev higher. So the characteristics is not as you expect it.
@@XxXxXCRV yeah I know... turbo fixed it a little. Still i miss the power in these everyday gassers. Only when pushed. But I want it everyday at low rpms to be responsive. Then you must press and it is too loud (rpms). Not to mention they are way thirstier then diesels when you do that so bye-bye fuel consumption. Diesels are way more forgiving in that category, if for some reason you decide to push something that doesn't need pushing. Overtaking, for fun of whatever.
Yes, diesel is more efficient on highway (not in town), but it sounds like a garbage and smells terribly, also it's more expensive per litre where I live, so they are similar and I would take 1.5 eTSI 150PS anyway (+stage 1 would give me almost 200PS + better efficiency).
Idk how you people complain about the diesel smell.They are not tractors they have tons of anti polution system I bet you cant smell shit....also they need to actually be broken burn rich or oil to actually smell something.Burnt gas smells far worse I would rather cry and get cancer from diesel smoke.I ve stayed in traffic behind many gas and diesel cars and I can tell you that regular cars like this smell like nothing at all.The shitty gasoline smell(burnt skin smell) i can only feel it when i m staying behind a sports car with a big engine and no opf that also gives some smoke under heavy acceleration
@@n8n8n8nI doubt that too.I shove it in then fill it up no time to smell anything.the only thing I hate is that is oily.I really dont know how diesel smells unburnt.I like the smell of gas tho(unburnt too ofc i already told you my opinion on exhaust gases smell)
@@pempiukas It only smells if you fill up the DPF in City driving conditions and it doesn't matter how old the car is.If you don't floor it at least once a month on highway it s going to stink even brand new
This is bad testing. You cant tell what is average speed after driving a car for 20 seconds, until the first fuel consumption shows on a dash. Each time at least 10km should be driven.
In this test diesel was shown quite well exegerately, but in real life, 2.0 diesel is a dream for 2.7 liters.4.5 liter around maybe realistic only possible downhill 2.7 liter/100km. Even the VW Lupo 1.2 diesel burns 3 liters, which is much lighter and smaller in volume and pretty efficient engine. It is obvious that the 1.0 gasoline engine is driven on completely different roads. Those 2 cars are defienetely had been driven in different road conditions. At the same time, the 1.0 TSI can go down to 3.5 liters in different reviews, and these figures are not even approached in the video. I think if the road conditions were the same, gasoline engune would consume gas as little as a diesel.
You didn't do a fuel consumption test at 2000 rpm Petrol and Diesel.... the same rpm was needed.. It's not good to go under revs with any diesel engine.
@@Digi20 At low rpm with diesel I don't know what EGR and turbo will say....I don't underestimate dpf....you don't have this problems with gasoline engine...On long runs (highway) yes the diesel is winner. But overall gasoline engine win
Petrol vs Diesel / 1.0 vs 2.0 / Who do you think is the winner?
in the city, clearly the petrol
@@nfsdisney have you ever had a german diesel? but what you're saying? c'mon man
@@prometheus994 по экологии бензин. В городе это важнее.
@@svenparker бензин экологичен? хорошо сделанные дизеля это нормально а дальше уже смотря какие у тебя потребности...только не надо говорить что один двигатель лучше другого потому что он экологичнее
@@prometheus994 бензин экологичнее дизеля и это факт.
Golf 8, 1.0tsi
Traveled distance: 321 km
Driving time: 05:36 h
⌀ speed: 58.4 km/h
⌀ fuel consumption: 4.6 l/100 km
You should compare it to 1.0tsi DSG 7 gears, then it will be more accurate.Keep sharing these kind of content👍
Thanks! 1.0 TSI DSG 7 would also be nice to test ⛽
But even 1 liter more is very much
I'm impressed that 1.0 is able to drive 200km/h
Golf 8 FL Variant 1.5 tsi 150 PS, 205/55R16 Nexen tires. 3,5 l/100 km @92 kph, 4,2@112, 5,8@132, 7,0@152. Displayed consumption is spot on according to distributor.
Honestly I wouldn't rely on the computer. You need to measure how many liters go into your tank when fueling up, then divide your total km by the amount. That would be most accurate. I doubt you really would get like 1lt/20km or anything close. You might very well get 1lt/16-18km.
that's correct, my Renault indicates a consumption of less than 0.3 lt x 100 km tested many times at refueling even on trips of 2500 km.
My Rapid 2019 1.0 TSi eats just 5/100 on autobahn and i can hit the gas how much i want (ECU mod, 250nm, 105kW/140HP).. fully laden car light foot 4.6-4.8/100..
This video perfectly sums up the disaster of gasser engines. And when they say that they consume "1L more". Don't forget you will have almost 100hp with golf at everyday RPM (~2000) (but with 1.0 TSI you will drive on 20-40 hp in reality, maybe 50hp so forget max 110hp which you will never reach. Advertising trick. 9L at 160km/h LOL.
the golf 7 tdi has been bulit proof, providing your life isn't around town at city speed all the time I wouldn't recommend dute to the particulate filter being clogged but if your on a long commute in-between city's the diesel is a no brainer, I often get 62 mpg at 65mpg 590 mile range. as good as the 1.0 litre engine is its just too small and slow for everyday, I would recommend the 1.5 or 1.4 phev if your a city dweller with a charge slot on your drive, your save a fortune
Modern 1L engines are a lot more quicker than what they used to be. My 1L Seat Arona is much faster than my 1.4 Golf was.
@@ProBroOfficial I forgot to also mention the short life of the engine also below 100,000 miles on 1ltr many others that have done more dev major issues making them uneconomic to repair
I own a golf 1.6 tdi gt model 2019 gave me 48 mpg 2 motorway journeys and 3 weeks local driving full tank gave me 520 miles
i own 2 golf 7 one 2018 1.0 tsi 110hpwith 55000km and one 2014 2.0 tdi 150hp with 230000km and the fuel consumption are diferent that is shown here. the average on the 1.0 tsi is 7 liters on city driving and 6l on highway at 120kmh...it gets nowere near 5.3l on 120kmh...maybe downhill...and on 2.0tdi in the city i get 6.5-7.5 average(depends on trafic) and in the highway 6l at 120kmh or 6.5 liters on highway at 130-150kmh. on secondary roads, ar 80kmh i get average 4.5 liters with both cars. both cars are well maintained at every 10-12000km with nonpremium fuels.
Which would you recommend economy, reliability and practicality wise?
I own a 2.0 TDI Skoda Octavia 150hp. In average 4,9 liters including city & highway. At 120kmh on long distance 4,5-4,7 liters and at 80kmh on long distance 3,5 liters/100km. Short distance quite more, depends how short. I never got more than 6 Liter at longer distances. If you Drive more than 180kmh sure, but at 120kmh never.
You are wrong. 4.5 at 80??? Yeah...
depends on the wheels and tires. i have a golf 1.5 and i had 16inch wheels until a month ago. now i upgraded to 18 inch with stickier rubber and my fuel consumption went up by 1l across the board with the same driving.
To add to this - I was able to drive below 4.0l/100 km (even 3.6l/100km once) with my 1.5 tsi. Its mostly driving style issue if you have high consumption with these cars.
Cold start is an issue with big diesel. If both cars are tested with cold engines, 2.0tdi will burn more fuel
Never Ever! The Fuel numbers on VW Dash computers are WAY OF! i drove my 1.6 TDi polo 400km, My computer Says 3,1L 100, My fuel pump tells me it was 4,3 L !!! other way around, if my Computer says 6,4 it's more like 5,7
Yes, I don't trust almost _anything_ on my 2012 Golf TDI center panel! Especially fuel consumption.
considering that in the tdi ther's 12 degrease celsius outside in the 1.0 tfsi is 23 and this is so important for efficiency and fuel consumption, the tdi worked in cold temperature and consuming more than if it was at 23 degrease like the gasoline one.
As a new car for 3 years leasing let's say I would definitely go for petrol. As used car I'd go for diesel.
I’d go for the diesel for new and used
@@aidan1585 id go for petrol for new and used
@@paradox5556 the 1.0 tsi drives poorly, the 2.0 tdi is noisy but it drives far better... 1.5 tsi is more reccomended
@@aidan1585 i own the 1.5 tsi
Of course disel for more than 20-25k a year
2.0TDi is by far better engine than 1.0 but for consumption i wouldn't say that is this better in reality. My expiriance i had GTD and regular 2.0tdi PD and Common rail my father has 1.0tsi. i wouls say normal driving avarage consumption is same. But for city driving i would go for 1.0 for short driving. But thar engine is more for Polo or Fabia not for golf. Golf is for 1.5tsi and abowe
VWs read 10 percent lower than actual fuel consumption.
I have seat toledo with 1.0tsi. The consumption is the same as the one calculated when I fill it up. But we can not compare a diesel and a petrol one. The gearboxes are different, the diesel runs at lower rpms because of the longer gears. I manage to do 2,2l/100km with my 1.0tsi. A correct test would be to run this engines at the same rpms and see the consumption.
Don't forget that diesel will get to 2/3 of his power almost instantly (somewhere around max torque). Forget about that 110hp in 1.0 TSI. A lot of times you will drive on 20-30hp unless you will be reving it to the redline which you will not (lots of noise)
The power of the 1.0 Engine is okay above 1500rpm. It needs a lot of time to get turbo pressure. Then 200nm of torque is enough at least in the Seat Ibiza. Above 5500rpm it don’t really want to rev higher. So the characteristics is not as you expect it.
@@XxXxXCRV yeah I know... turbo fixed it a little. Still i miss the power in these everyday gassers. Only when pushed. But I want it everyday at low rpms to be responsive. Then you must press and it is too loud (rpms). Not to mention they are way thirstier then diesels when you do that so bye-bye fuel consumption. Diesels are way more forgiving in that category, if for some reason you decide to push something that doesn't need pushing. Overtaking, for fun of whatever.
Not true. Tsi has been made to provide high torque at low rpm. I own a tsi engine and already at 1800 rpm it starts pulling hard.
Nice test. Thanks.
Diesel the best
to short distance. try on at least 10km... you will diffrent result
Why not the 1.0 etsi automatic
Yes, diesel is more efficient on highway (not in town), but it sounds like a garbage and smells terribly, also it's more expensive per litre where I live, so they are similar and I would take 1.5 eTSI 150PS anyway (+stage 1 would give me almost 200PS + better efficiency).
Idk how you people complain about the diesel smell.They are not tractors they have tons of anti polution system I bet you cant smell shit....also they need to actually be broken burn rich or oil to actually smell something.Burnt gas smells far worse I would rather cry and get cancer from diesel smoke.I ve stayed in traffic behind many gas and diesel cars and I can tell you that regular cars like this smell like nothing at all.The shitty gasoline smell(burnt skin smell) i can only feel it when i m staying behind a sports car with a big engine and no opf that also gives some smoke under heavy acceleration
@@STR1XDLB Sniff when you refuel
@@n8n8n8nI doubt that too.I shove it in then fill it up no time to smell anything.the only thing I hate is that is oily.I really dont know how diesel smells unburnt.I like the smell of gas tho(unburnt too ofc i already told you my opinion on exhaust gases smell)
@@STR1XDLB its ok while its new, give it 3-5 years and its gonna stink like a hell
@@pempiukas It only smells if you fill up the DPF in City driving conditions and it doesn't matter how old the car is.If you don't floor it at least once a month on highway it s going to stink even brand new
This is bad testing. You cant tell what is average speed after driving a car for 20 seconds, until the first fuel consumption shows on a dash. Each time at least 10km should be driven.
this is showing real time economy, on vw you can switch between average and real time
Tdi ❤❤❤
Kár hogy egyik autót sem szabad tartósan városban használni...
DSG7 VS BM6 ce n’est pas pareil pour comparer…
DSG7 est plus économique surtout en ville …
1L tsi boit 6 r
2l tdi boit 7r
In this test diesel was shown quite well exegerately, but in real life, 2.0 diesel is a dream for 2.7 liters.4.5 liter around maybe realistic only possible downhill 2.7 liter/100km. Even the VW Lupo 1.2 diesel burns 3 liters, which is much lighter and smaller in volume and pretty efficient engine. It is obvious that the 1.0 gasoline engine is driven on completely different roads. Those 2 cars are defienetely had been driven in different road conditions. At the same time, the 1.0 TSI can go down to 3.5 liters in different reviews, and these figures are not even approached in the video. I think if the road conditions were the same, gasoline engune would consume gas as little as a diesel.
ty
340km auf der Uhr und schon mit hoher Drehzahl 200kmh fahren... die nächsten Besitzer tun mir leid. Motorschaden ist vorprogrammiert!
Ja und? Muss man zu erst 5000 Kilometer machen?
@@ggregga um die 1000 sollte man schon machen...
You didn't do a fuel consumption test at 2000 rpm Petrol and Diesel.... the same rpm was needed.. It's not good to go under revs with any diesel engine.
That is just the way the automatic gearbox shifts and is totally fine this way.
OMG, what a bullshit…
@@Digi20 At low rpm with diesel I don't know what EGR and turbo will say....I don't underestimate dpf....you don't have this problems with gasoline engine...On long runs (highway) yes the diesel is winner. But overall gasoline engine win
but diesel much prize