David J. Gross - What's Real About Time?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 июн 2024
- Time seems natural and absolute: the flow of moments, one following another, from the unknown past to the knife's edge present to the unknowable future. But perhaps this is not so. Einstein shocked the world by showing that time was relative. What's the latest about time?
Free access to Closer to Truth's library of 5,000 videos: bit.ly/376lkKN
Watch more interviews on time: bit.ly/34b9sZ5
David Jonathan Gross is an American particle physicist and string theorist.
Register for free at CTT.com for subscriber-only exclusives: bit.ly/2GXmFsP
Closer to Truth presents the world’s greatest thinkers exploring humanity’s deepest questions. Discover fundamental issues of existence. Engage new and diverse ways of thinking. Appreciate intense debates. Share your own opinions. Seek your own answers.
Anyone who’s had an old VCR with a clock on it knows just how mysterious time really is.
Truth !
Ha!
This made my day! Or my hour… maybe…perhaps…not yet…soon…in a minute 🤣 📺 📼🕰🤣
Absolutely brilliant, lost count of how many times I've watched this already!
"Things are going to get weirder!" Yeah, that's about where my world is at! Strap in and enjoy the ride I say! What an incredible time we think we live in. 🤗🤗🤗
Wonderful telling voice David Gross has, also his timing and silences in between. Greet to listen to.
The universe laughs at our futile attempts at making order of that which cannot be controlled or manipulated. Time is a construct. There is only NOW.
It's just beating around the bush toying around conceptual thoughts from the beginning to the end and still we haven't got the faintest idea what's the reality of time.
I wouldn't want to take mushrooms with this guy, he would break my brain
It blows my mind that as soon as something happens, it is infinitely out of reach.
If you drop a glass and break it, you can't go back and unbreak it, no matter what. That might not be a profound comment, but it's the first thing that came to mind.
you mean you can't exist "inside" that event, that it has disappeared in to time?
It's all a simulation. Don't fool yourself.
@@edholohan Simulation of what? And what simulates that which is simulating our world and us? ... See? all such overly anthropocentric and limited thoughts and imaginations show how primitive we still are. Simulation is a concept in the language that only has meaning where there is an absolute reality that can be "relatively" simulated. Also, the epistemology of simulation is rather limited, as for simulation measurement is the key, and measurement is always mathematical in our modern approach, but mathematics in general as Wittgenstein states is not truly real in a sense that numbers won't grow on trees. The world is an analog world, and numbers as discrete conceptual objects are only there to help us make sense of the world through such linguistic medium. However, that does not mean that the 'reality' itself should necessarily be limited to our own interpretations of it, far from it.
Yes Now ShAzAm !!!
This is a masterful presentation of time. Incredible.
Love it! Would love to see a 90 minute clip ^^
this is a lucid gem thank you
Continuously in the present time. Losing grasp of the past and forever reaching for the futur. Yet, the present time is all there is.
I have also thought of this concept while trying to deal with the grief of my mom’s passing.
It’s good to know even our most respected scientists have no earthly clue what’s going on. He’s turning to mysticism I think. I don’t blame him it’s a real mystery! Great content thanks
Yes, I wonder if we earthlings will ever understand what's going on. Is it because we are part of the universe so we can never truly 'observe'...
Question: Is this part of a longer interview? Which one? So interesting and good questions asked, indeed!
CTT has been interviewing many over the years and this might be thought of as part of a series with different people. Time, money, spacetime and everything else might all be mere social constructs and neither real nor true but necessary for our continued cooperation and existence.
@@scoreprinceton lol
@@scoreprinceton yeah, dark side of the moon is lit
@@jd35711 This question is asked using a language consisting of words and their definitions contained in a dictionary. This language framework that humans are accustomed to, is an imaginary system of reference. Humans interact with the physical world (earth, plant, other humans or object) as well as with abstract concepts such as money, honor etc., by so called dimensions based on a measurement system of units of numbers. These interconnected systems are conceived by a biological brain. Time in this context is fluid and can and often morphs into an infinite variety, limited only by imagination. In this situation, one can easily answer this question, if anything is possible, why not an invention of a societal-time, since clocks are already in use.
The dynamics of expression are verified in the physical realm through experiments, engineering, mathematics and construction. Since humans, their dictionaries, the universe and the energies are all a closed loop of exchanges with no beginning or end in sight, one can continue to assert “anything that can be conceived can and might happen”, either here on earth or on the dark side of the moon when lit.
@@balasubr2252 i was… just making a dumb pink floyd joke
Most people, when they begin thinking seriously about the nature of time,
operate with the assumption that 'time' is an actual existent.
This is understandable because that assumption is baked into our language.
Lots of sentences contain explicit references to the temporal concept.
In all the rest references to the temporal concept are implicit.
We all learned in school that every sentence has a tense.
Could it be that the reality of time is contained entirely in the thinking process?
I say yes.
As soon as one internalizes that understanding
the mysterious nature of time evaporates completely and
with the mystery go all temporal paradoxes.
To put it another way
there is only stuff and that stuff is moving.
From this fact the thinking process synthesizes the temporal concept.
It does this as a way to simplify tracking the movements of vast amounts of stuff.
A 'day' is just a very efficient way to say one revolution of the Earth.
The clock's hands do exactly the same job
for everything that's moving.
If any reader still believes that time is 'real'
then tell me what it's made of. lol
One wierd thing about time is that when you spend time with someone /or doing something that you really love,time passes by really quickly
But the perception of passing of time is only a property of your mind, not time itself.
That's relativity
You are an infinite consciousness experiencing through this body.
Silence is a state of observation of consciousness.
Gravity is not present here.
Through this state you can observe gravity and all the thoughts generated.
Because we cannot get behind consciousness.
-- Max Planck ( Noblest )
Time is an illusion.
What's real is that it takes us a lot of time to understand that time passes very fast.
Very very very interesting; first time I understand what a Nobel Prize is telling. A real genious this man.
Dash Rip Rock
The real of time is the potential and realize time, that goes by.
into the now.. ..
How do quantum fields fit into 4D space-time block universe, especially considering when space is not represented in quantum field equations? Could the 4D space-time block universe contain the past, with quantum future in some way outside block universe?
what does time / energy uncertainty principle mean?
So time should be called change..and everything has it's own thing/shifting going on in an everlasting timeless whole.
True.
Yes, this topic is complicated. It's interesting to hear his views on what is, and how, and when it functions. We are placed in a time in which "we can only move in one direction" until we are stopped by death. Excellent!
Have you ever seen a real person in front of you, talked to them and the next day realize they never existed? Death is not real...the dead lives on at different times than ours and i believe they step into our 3 dimensional world and we are not in other dimensions yet but they been here and i don't see why can't they be allowed here since they been here before?
@@selihter Hello Sally, this is an interesting take on life and death. No, I've never realized this. I'm not sure what you mean by never existing. Perhaps you can define "Life" and "Death." What does it mean to be alive or to live? What does it mean to be dead or to die? I don't know how old you are but when you consider the years you've been "alive" all of the people who have been involved in your upbringing existed for a while or a time. How did they not exist? Your other point about death not being real... the fact that someone was taken away from our reality as a result of death by so many means such as killed, natural causes, or a natural disaster... allows us to realize that it happened and that it is our reality. This man is a Physics specialist. Like science, it's an ongoing study and research. Thank for replying and sharing. I'd love to get your response.
@@JacksonCaesar i am 54 years old which i sometimes doubting because I feel like I was either here before or in the future, future because I can see things before they happened, not with my eyes but i say it in my head. I am sure you have experienced a nonexistent thought or a feeling that made you change your mind about what you were doing, right? Something good or bad is about to happen and it does. This is why I think that i exist here now, in the past, future or not even exist at all. In my 20s I used to think alot about painful things and dreamed of scary things to a point to where i wake up crying, scared etc. ...over thirty years i have been telling my mind to stop dreaming and or having bad thinking. When i was maybe 8 or nine, I don't remember. I played with kids in my village and they would give me fruits and candies which I'd take home and my mom would make me throw them away. Years later, i told my dad that i saw my uncle earlier in the morning and said that he'd come to visit us and dad told me that he is not my uncle, I was probably 11 or 12. I insisted that I met my uncle which i thought was real, he was my uncle whose been gone way before I was born. The kids that i played with were also never existed. My son died last April and I feel like he just went to a different place if not here😔culturally my family get together and celebrate his death next April on his anniversary. I don't believe in it but i have to be there. My son is somewhere or nowhere and i will never get to see him like i seen nonexistent being when I was a kid:) the reason I don't believe that i will see my son is because when my dad died, I've been looking for him and he never showed up 😔 the day my son passed is the day i accepted that my dad and my son are gone forever and it is a good thing💝i am sorry if you still didn't understand my story 👍i do not share my stories with anyone because I feel like no one would listen and care enough to ask questions 👌
@@selihter Hello Sally, thanks for sharing. I know this wasn't easy to do, yet, I feel it was just as relieving for you to share. In response to your many statements, feeling as if you've been here before (Dejavu), you're not alone. "To be or not to be, that is the question."- Hamlet. [smiles...] We've all had those moments. The speaker in this video made a great point about our ' lifetime.' It moves forward but we can only live in ONE time, the present. Ironically, we cannot go back nor can we jump forward to the future. We all (in fact) share in this one time and space for the 'time being.' Moreover, like most of us, we've all had a sense of Dejavu but in order to experience this, we need to be in the present time. Whenever I have them, I approach them as a reminder to myself that I'm on the right track (maybe not the best but my destiny track). [smiles...] When it comes to making a decision, one thing I know to be true is that our intuitions are NEVER wrong. It's only when we second guess and or ignore it that we soon realize that we should've listened. I'd like to encourage you to follow more closely to your intuitions (perfect life guides). You'll be glad you did. Dreams are symbolic, not exact. I'm a dreamer. I'm in my 40s and I still dream (weekly). When I was younger, I would approach my mother with a new dream every week. My mother said, "perhaps you should study the dreamers in the bible." Once I began reading up and studying the dreamers in the bible such as Joseph, and Daniel. Which led me to Ezekiel, Jeremiah, Job, St. Paul, and St. John. What I begin to take notice was shapes, patterns, numbers, and symbols. Then I got a dream interpreter book and begin to log my dreams and eventually, I was able to interpret my dreams and in many cases my friends and family. But I don't volunteer that because I don't want to come across as a soothsayer. I'm so sorry to hear that you lost your son last year. I can only imagine how terrible this must have been for a parent. My condolences. I am a believer and I believe in what the bible teaches about death. "For the living know that they will die, but the dead know nothing; they have no further reward, and even their name is forgotten. 6 Their love, their hate and their jealousy have long since vanished; never again will they have a part in anything that happens under the sun. (Ecc. 9:5-6) Jesus in the story of Lazurus compared death to sleep..., and another- "And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment". (Heb. 9:27) This is the cutoff, the mystery. Wishing you the best. Great having this conversation.
@@JacksonCaesar i thank you so much for everything that you have to say, it's really encouraging to know how caring a person is. I used to dream 2 habitual dreams; 1. i was on a black beautiful horse flying higher and higher and i could see my village burning and i saw my little brother and I could not safe him because the horse just kept going higher and higher. 2. I was falling into an endless hole and never landed and kept falling and this was the worst of the 2. I would always wake up crying and shaking. God is always good at the right time, take care and always stay humble 💝
Time is a mental construct. In fact it's consciousness that imagined the notion of time. If one has become conscious enough then one realizes that this very moment has existed for eternity and will continue to exist for eternity.
Truth .... 💚 From Syria
The Eternal Here and Now, is our self,
the eternal stream of now's is our consciousness
@@holgerjrgensen2166 Yes it is truth 💚
He has an 'appropriate' name - GROSS! What an appalling Academic Public Purse Parasite (APPP)! He lies that time exists, solely to grovel to the Einsteinisn lie that time exists!! TIME DOES NOT EXIST, OR MOVE!! TIME IS DISTANCE, NOTING MORE!! Einstein 'CONCOCTED' the Space-Time lie because he could NOT demonstrate time exists or moves!! The lying catholics in 325AD 'CONCOCTED the same 'Blessed-Trinity' fraud because the 'god' lie could not be true; it is INVENTING a further more inexplicable lie to allegedly explain the original lie!! That's why this APPP threw in 'String-Theory' (with its attendant '11' dimensions bullshit), to cover his blatant lying!! The smirk on this APPP's face all through the interview shoes he uses it as a weapon to lie and he has siphoned off taxpayers money his entire bogus career pushing this TOTAL bullshit!! All is known! > 21C Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Physica www.academia.edu/12805065/21C_Philosophiæ_Naturalis_Principia_Physica
When you die the illusion breaks and resets since there's no reason why it wouldn't. Unless there's a next life, it's this prison over and over again. Better make it full of good moments then.
This guy seems like he knows an awful lot, and is also keenly aware of what he (or “we”) don’t know.
Superb Most Excellent Partial Time Travel Modifications . . .Yes ?!
I find looking at my watch occasionally is sufficient.
That's because you are not searching for your dead child. Always different perspectives through time. If time is an illusion, my daughter is somewhere else.
😄
@@janetgoldsbury8872 May your day be without suffering. May you be at Peace.
Could causation / events have something to do with forward motion of time? Do quantum fields bring events / causation into future time?
If physics has proven that the act of observing events affects the events, how does our observation affect time?
This guy could read the ingredients of mayonnaise and make it sound intriguing.
Lol, pea and a tomato went for a walk, tomato is way behind and pea said to tomato; you need to ketchup lol
I love these videos from Robert, but I think differently concerning TIME. No event, no instance of quantum wave function collapses without TIME being there to greet it. It's not a product of something, but rather the Progenitor of All.
This turned out to be a very interesting interview. I have my own hypothesis concerning time: I believe that the concept of time and death are intricately tied together. I believe that man created the concept of time to gauge where he is at on the line segment of birth to death. The ability to gauge where we are at on that line segment helps to allay the anxiety that we feel subconsciously regarding death.
Yes I agree, can I take this further, I only think it is "now" and time is just the fourth dimension
a very handy tool, a "concept" Any comment on that
Yes, I agree that there is only a "now". However, I do not agree that time is a fourth dimension because it does not actually exist within nature. It exist only in our minds as a concept. In this regard, I think that Prof Einstein and Minkowski got it wrong.
@@daves2520 When I said, it was the "fourth dimension", I only mean it as a concept
so I can give you coordinates in x,y and z to give you a spatial pinpoint, but if I don't
tell you when, you could die waiting for me. only joking, this is why we have clocks
that turn at the same rate, and as long as you and I agree with having the same clock's starting position, we can coordinate our meeting at the same moment at the XYZ junction. To me, that's the fourth dimension, but only as a concept.
unless you think the fourth dimension is something that actually exists?
I have no idea what that is.
Yes, I agree with you that the fourth dimension does not actually exist. But it seems to me that when scientists speak of time as a fourth dimension, they imply that it actually exists within nature.@@gknight4719
Time is the flow of being.
True, and a nice koan.
Can time move in direction of past through space, as well as into future? Would that make two dimensions of time or one?
Might the "now" moment be how decoherence is expressed in the time dimension of space-time? So, in space we experience solid matter (as opposed to the wave it emerged from) and in time we experience the "now". The implication would be that time is emergent from mass, not fundamental. Also, the arrow of time would therefore be the result of our continuously expanding universe, which in turn "stretches" all matter, which in turn generates a continuous flow of new "now" moments. Another implication of this way of thinking is that entropy is the result of our expanding universe.
Time = Mind
Or mind equals time
How does one moment of time cover a vast expanse of space, perhaps infinite?
For four dimensional space-time, is time measuring the evolution of space into the past? In quantum mechanics, does time measure the evolution of the wave function into the future?
If time is an illusion.
It's a very consistent illusion.
"Be Bop A Lula." -Gene Vincent
@@ZiplineShazam
Now that's a different kind of illusion.
😁
@@thomasridley8675 Cheers !!
@@ZiplineShazam
👍
could time inside and for universe be different than time outside or beyond universe? time of the universe for expansion of space and increasing entropy therein; time beyond universe without space and entropy or energy?
When I grow old, I want to speak like him.
Space and time are consequences “the field”. The field fills the Universe and limits the passage of energy through it to the speed of light, and by that process causes and regulates time. The field creates space, but it is the passage of energy through the field and the presence of masses of energy that create the substance of reality. Functionally the matter in the Universe is an Energy Emulsion, Quanta of Energy contained and separated by the Field. David Gross’s explanation of the nature of Nucleus of Protons and Neutrons demonstrates this concept perfectly, except that he hasn’t quite got to the reality that it is the Field that encapsulates and contains the surging energy of the Quarks and the Strong Nuclear Force Energy. It is the sum of the Quarks and the Strong Nuclear Force by his description that ARE the mass of the Particles, the final step towards full appreciation of the Unity is in realizing that the process of containment, just as the Field regulates the speed of light and the passage of particles through the field, that impart the energy to the Field that produce Gravity in the form of a Field Energy Intensity Gradient that proportionally from the Field Energy of Deep Space to the Boundary Energy of Matter Particles is in fact Gravity experienced as the square of the distance apart they are.
So close. Just not quite there yet.
What was the creation moment of the Universe? It was a moment when Infinte Dimensionless Energy spontaneously transitioned to Field Energy, and Dynamic Energy became finite, immersed as an emulsion in an Energy Field. Bang. Just like that. From Nothing to Everything in an Instant.
Just to sum up - Time, I have no idea, we seem to go forwards and not backwards... tada!
Maybe the mystery of time connected to mystery consciousness?
Only us slow-moving turtles see the beginning and end, here and there, past and future as separate.
~revealing
The explanation of time in this theoretical way is way beyond my understanding. But my experience of time tells me that my brain is partly, at least partly, creating my own experience of time. Time needs brains.
Time does not need any form of consciousness/brain to exist.
Time was here long before any brain or life.
Only Your perception of time needs consciousness/brain.
@@jareknowak8712 The same applies to everything, including the universe and life. But without perception (= brain ) these disappear. The question remains: what is real? Time isn't real until and unless it is perceived/experienced. It is a bit like a baby who can only be real at birth.
@@catherinemoore9534
I think, things can exist even if we are not aware of them. Consciousness is not a determinant of existence, it is important only for the observer, but not true reality.
Without consciousness, only Your World disappears, but not the real, outside World. Consciousness allows You to experience the World, which does not mean that it is its "master".
@@catherinemoore9534
no there is still time, or else you wouldn't have been born.
ruclips.net/video/hZ1OgQL9_Cw/видео.html
is time real? yes. we have video to show it before we were even born.
before we were born we were simply unawares of this time until we woke up into it.
when you don't exist you are unaware of time. say you are rebuilt you won't say: "gee that took a long time"
One of the problems with dealing with time is that it is always moving. Even relative time never stops. It can approach zero, but, never stop, because, of the seed of light limit.
For photons time does not move.
Sometimes I do not have the time for a timely discussion.
I think it's about time for a time out.
but then you'd be out of time
The physics professor reminds me of the guy in Taken (the alien abduction series).
So perhaps time is another physical dimension and we're falling (or rising) untethered through it.
Time is our way of measuring relative motion between objects. Each moment in time that we experience as the present is simply a rearrangement of objects within the scope of the individual conscious agent's reality. Time is a convenient illusion.
I agree except instead of "Time is a convenient illusion" I would say,
'Time is a convenient concept'.
@@REDPUMPERNICKEL That works. Thanks for the upgrade!
What time is it?
I believe...Time is: A recognition and measure of change in the entire existing universe, caused by the motion of matter/energy in relation to itself. Because time is founded in motion, time is relative to speed.
This is as close as any “human animal” can get to explaining an “understanding” of “time”. The “relative” nature of “time” as it “pertains” to humans as an organism, entity and just a simple or complex arrangement of atoms becomes almost an argument of semantics.
Is it possible that humans do not posses the vocabulary to explain to ourselves or eachother a “true” understanding of time enough so that we can effect change in time and space beyond the phenomenological and experiential aspects we perceive using not just our innate and natural senses but the passing of information as it “evolves” and new ideas are formed to perform experiments? For example, to throw a rock in a pond and watch the ripples as an opposite reaction to an action as it seems to “move forward” but not backwards. Maybe it is just enthropic action and has nothing to do with “time” as we perceive it but knowing it maybe can only be understood using other means like mathematics.
The “truth”, or as close as we can get to it seems to be that we want “time” to be the same as we perceive it but we know from Einstein it is not and in fact “time as we think we know it, or to the best of our ability now is that it is relative. We must keep exploring this universe. We must get off this planet and break the suicide pact some humans don’t know they are involved. Those that have this hold on the limited amount of “time” our species exists need to change the power structure so we can save our humanity from total annihilation before this universe ends or at least our planet has another extinction level event. Hopefully this will happen so we can truly answer, or get closer then we are now to a somewhat real understanding of how, what, when, where and the ultimate question of why this universe exists.
Time may just be a figment of our imagination but for a simple purpose. Survival.
The relative nature of time from one atom to the next is infinite is it not? Who gets to decide beyond the universe how time is relative from one object to another? And if so or not then the existence of how time can sometimes be, is immaterial. Why does it matter? Why do we care? I think we should for no other reason than the curiosity and the nature of our being to be curious should keep trying to find out.
With that said, “time” doesn’t exist per say. “Time” from a philosophical standpoint is just a word. The etymology can be traced back. The meaning in the end only matters as a cultural factor to get on with our daily lives.
Has anyone bothered to ask if a seven day week even exists? Why not 8 days? The perceived patterns of our solar system matter to our bodies for survival just like it matters to every organisms on this planet we know of a and have studied. But the deeper questions are a fathom of a hot sticky mess that maybe only math and those brave enough to dream and dare themselves as well as others to go beyond the impossible like Einstein and Oppenheimer and experiment.
Maybe just the beauty of discover will be all we get. Even if we could pierce reality or fold space and time to travel somewhere else why would we do that? What would the purpose be exactly? Survival? Fitness points? Resources to bring back to earth for what? So Hollywood can make more movies and more money?
07:07 new reality , to study the topological geometry . i like that statement . well i think i am on that path . in a couple of days i will be sending my sixth edition of my compendium in mathematics to scientific academy of Sweden , Norway and England . later on soon i will editing what i call an attempt to merge guage theory and relativity , which inherently i think is the way forward . Regards from Tehran . Amir Asl Khalili
With UFO disclosures next month. We may get a glimpse of how wierd physics can be applied, and how amazing it is.
@@Braun09tv Imagine that our chambers are products of inverse geometry. Then we can generate vaccuum outside from within.
@@Braun09tv Only pitchforks with resonant frequencies synchronize. Maybe it is by breaking the frequency rather than making the frequency, that UFO do not resonate with our air.
you're a braver man than me for even bringing that up
I cannot wrap my mind about Time.
Is time connecting the classic space of universe to quantum world?
The relation is a very simple concept. - Space as a unit is inserted in the Time dimension. Time is moving everything toward the future, so...every particle of the Universe every new second are moved to a different position of the Time dimension. This providing the irreversibility of the physical processes in the Universe because nothing can go to its previous position!
what is time ?
if one consider charge (i mean electric charge ) point distributions and discrete points in space , since universe did not have beginning and thus not an end , and by space i mean a two perpendicular planes , which can be represented by two matrix variables M(x1) and M(x2) ;
one can understand that each plane has two spatial dimensions .
which once described by only one temporal variable , can indicates that ,
variations in the distribution of charge in each of these two planes , each having two spatial dimensions ,
can be understood as , for each temporal boundary ,
despite variations in each of the other two spatial dimensions , the mutual axis ( spatial dimension ) , which results in internally temporal , relative continuity ; to emerge as , the surrounding being relatively non-continuous ( thus relatively empty ) .
once one consider many of these internally more continuous , charge distributions ( distinguishable from their neighboring almost empty space ) , since charge distribution existence , is a self causal phenomena , which
at each instance , spatial variations in electric charge distribution is equivalent to emergence of magnetic force ;
if one consider the electric charge distribution in 2-surface ,
if one consider the magnetic force distribution in 2-surface ,
one can argue , that , in the spatial regions , there is an equilibrium between these two phenomena , a regionally temporal ( and distinguishable region from its surrounding ) manifests . this notion can be regarded as internal clock of that region.
due to internal coherence in the pattern of that ( magnetic force - electric charge | phenomena ) , the relative , various spatially distinct coherent regions , with respect to each other , since have various ( angular , orientation of their internal equilibrium ) , results in , the emergence of , the phenomena of
occurrence of relative dynamics.
this is the manifestation of external clock.
each internal coherent ( equilibrium of electric charge - magnetic force ) , can be regarded as a region such as:
an atom
a molecule
a bulk of atom-molecules ( in the form of gas - liquid - solid )
the formulation of this perspective can be simulated , in
f(M(x1) ,M(x2) | N(x1) , N(x2) ) = some parameter related to charge distribution in space , as one instance of universe . such that M(x1) and M(x2) are electric charge observables ( parameters ) and N(x1) and N(x2) are magnetic force observables ( parameters ) .
and the time operator over this function ( realization of spatially coherent regions ) ; as the full model.
time operator can be defined as what is defined in my compendium in mathematics , which is :
observation of f( M(x1)-N(x1) , M(x2)-N(x2) ) , as f( ai,bi) function construction by interpolation ;
and then placing multiples of electric charge- value representations , as inputs ; and magnetic force-value representations of ( multiples of a parameter known as ? ) , and performing transpose operation to get f*(ai,bi) , and re-interpolating.
such that , recursive such time -operator , reaches back to the original f( , | , ) .
such f ( , | , ) is the closed form modeling of a region of space-time.
in this modeling :
M(x1) , M(x2) , N(x1) , N(x2) , can be rearranged such that parameters such as , relative electric susceptibility - relative magnetic susceptibility , can be formulated as observables .
this f( , | , ) , is postulated to obey e.m=1/{v=c} ^2 , equation , in such a way that , c is the internal dynamic speed of the region.
once the v is equal to c , the f( , | , ) is the equation of a wave (E-M) .
once the v is not equal to c , the f( , | , ) , is the equation of a particle.
one can notice that , parameters like e , m ( electric permittivity and magnetic permeability ) and their relative counterparts , related to electric susceptibility and magnetic susceptibility , can not only be rearranged from M(x1) , M(x2 ) , N(x1) and N(x2 ) , but also are , orientationally and angularly , parameters , with respect to a universal spatial coordinate .
I think the issue date of this video has entered a rift in time - it is clear this interview was conducted many years ago - certainly not in May 2021!
"Gene Vincent, Chuck Berry, Link Wray and Bo Diddly agree with you."
Time is 'the shadow' of Motion.
Motion is the most precious sign of life.
The Motion-Principle is very basic for the Consciousness and 'the stuff-side', physics.
Time do only exist in the mind of a living being.
I know that time slows down the faster we move
But how does gravity effect time? The farther I move away from the earth, does time change for me? Does it get slower or faster?
Clocks tick more slowly as they approach a gravitational field. Anything that has mass, can be considered a 'clock'. Things that don't have mass (such as photons) don't experience time.
@@stelissa4039 so assuming people live on a massive "earth" say the size of Jupiter - their time is much slower than ours?
@@ramaraksha01 that's right and as we move faster, we gain mass (relative to an observer) and that means that our biological clocks also slow down, again relative to an observer.
Gravity affects the way things move.
Acceleration affects the way things move.
Time is the concept we use to think about the movement of matter.
Time is not a thing-in-itself,
time is a concept only.
time is a nano second--everything else is a memory, thining ahead in time is a projection.
i have wondered, what if it takes eons of the universe's most fundamental time properties to pass for each nanosecond of our conscious experience to advance?
Not too keen on how he refuses to answer direct questions but just obfuscates with some sort of physics woo woo.
He didn't obfuscate, he is just not a good teacher. He knows everything, except for how to put it together into a format that non-physicists can actually learn from.
He gets further and further away from saying anything informative or useful with each sentence after a question.
Time is the result of awareness beings perceiving changes in the mass-energy equilibrium. Nothing more than that. People make too much confusion out of this...
"Why as the Universe expands things get more disordered?" (1:30). Many believe the Universe is expanding and even expanding at a more accelerated rate than before. This begs the question "What is the Universe expanding into?". But, what if the Universe is not expanding into some unknown but rather universally shrinking within its fixed boundary and shrinking at an accelerated rate?
Universe expands into possibilities. Past is only one possibility and future is almost infinite. I think it can be argued that all the universe until now has collapsed to one thing.
Coincidently, just post today.. the answer to the question what is universe expanding into. Personally, it did not really seem to be the "right" answer, wd seem it has expand into something. Anyway, watch and decide for yourself:
ruclips.net/video/l3C_db2RjKo/видео.html
If we live in a simulation, as has been theorized, than yes.. its all data..😉
why does it beg the question "what does it expand into"? If live on an infinite sheet (x, y), and my universe expands to (2x,2y)....it still has the same volume, but it's 4x the previous size.
@@DrDeuteron If an infinite sheet as you suggest then it is possible that other universes exist on the same plain that are also expanding possibly toward our universe. If you stop asking questions then you limit your expansion of knowledge such as my suggestion our universe may be shrinking.
Space is real, but, time is what humans define it to be for the laws of physics to work out.
If changes do exist, time is not only a human concept.
However we define time, it is real: it makes us all get older and eventually die, without exception.
I wonder who are those who are constantly downvoting this channel? Is there any reason, or an obsession, or just boredom, or are there ideological reasons, or is there hostility against asking questions? Could those people explain? Of course, ignoring them is the answer, but it leaves the question open.
The subject of time is fundamental and answers could possibly give a direction into understanding what consciousness is.
Lies are ALWAYS downvoted!! He has an 'appropriate' name - GROSS! What an appalling Academic Public Purse Parasite (APPP)! He lies that time exists, solely to grovel to the Einsteinisn lie that time exists!! TIME DOES NOT EXIST, OR MOVE!! TIME IS DISTANCE, NOTING MORE!! Einstein 'CONCOCTED' the Space-Time lie because he could NOT demonstrate time exists or moves!! The lying catholics in 325AD 'CONCOCTED the same 'Blessed-Trinity' fraud because the 'god' lie could not be true; it is INVENTING a further more inexplicable lie to allegedly explain the original lie!! That's why this APPP threw in 'String-Theory' (with its attendant '11' dimensions bullshit), to cover his blatant lying!! The smirk on this APPP's face all through the interview shoes he uses it as a weapon to lie and he has siphoned off taxpayers money his entire bogus career pushing this TOTAL bullshit!! All is known! > 21C Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Physica www.academia.edu/12805065/21C_Philosophiæ_Naturalis_Principia_Physica
I think it's just people for whom the only way to articulate is to negate because there is no comprehension
Time is a single active progressive dimension. Space is constructed by passive space-oriented dimensions. Space as a separate structural unit is inserted onto the Time dimension. Time is moving space continuously in one direction. - This is the mechanism of the irreversibility of the universal processes because nothing can go back to its previous position because everything continuously is moving toward the future! If you want to learn more, just find my book.
@@valentinmalinov8424 Thank you. I will check. I just started looking into the current work of Stephen Wolfram who works on a universal theory... worth looking into...
Isn't the host a movie actor? I could be wrong though...
arrow of time with increasing entropy and expansion of space in universe?
What will be outside space-time?
There is no space time, it seems.
Abstract objects, like mathematics.
Time is a flat circle. Next question.
🌴😎💯
ruclips.net/video/_6-YgQtYy8k/видео.html
💚 From Syria ...." Time and Space are not conditions in which we live , but modes by which we think . Physical concepts are free creations of the human mind , and are not , however it may seem , determined by external world ." ~ ALBERT EINSTEIN
Right now the most real thing about time is that I just wasted ten minutes and fifty-three seconds of it. And why does Gross confuse inanity with profundity?
Good one
I wish time would stop my aging. The years are flying as time goes by.
Yes. . .I concur
Indications from String Theory? Yeah, whatever. Some people are so in love with their mathematical toys that they throw all common sense and logic to the wind.
It just dawned on me the other day that a thousand years and a single day happen at the same time in different places in the universe. It's simple (observed) general relativity. Time slows down and distance contracts because of gravity where there is a lot of matter. Conversely, time speeds up and distance expands where there is no matter in outer space.
This eliminates the need for dark matter since time speeds up in the outer spiral arms of a galaxy where there is not nearly as much matter. It eliminates the need for dark energy where space expands in outer space where there is no matter.
Another result of general relativity is that billions of years pass by in outer space (13 billion years) at the same time as thousands of years pass by where we are inside of the Milky Way galaxy. ...!
Conclusion: The time it took for Creation and since Creation in the Bible is absolutely true!
Nine directions in space?! 🤨
Time is the will of God in creation, time space is the mind of God in creation.
I don't understand
So is time relevant and relevance is everything which turned out to be nothing hidden in the mandalor or the chaos equation
The twin will not get back any younger, that's fallacy. For time dilation is always accompanied with distance constriction and distance constriction will increase the concentration of chemical elements, which will lead to accelerated chemical and biochemical reactions thus accelerated ageing process. Hence, time dilation and distance constriction will both ensure that the returning twin is as young/old as his brother who stayed on Earth.
He has an 'appropriate' name - GROSS! What an appalling Academic Public Purse Parasite (APPP)! He lies that time exists, solely to grovel to the Einsteinisn lie that time exists!! TIME DOES NOT EXIST, OR MOVE!! TIME IS DISTANCE, NOTING MORE!! Einstein 'CONCOCTED' the Space-Time lie because he could NOT demonstrate time exists or moves!! The lying catholics in 325AD 'CONCOCTED the same 'Blessed-Trinity' fraud because the 'god' lie could not be true; it is INVENTING a further more inexplicable lie to allegedly explain the original lie!! That's why this APPP threw in 'String-Theory' (with its attendant '11' dimensions bullshit), to cover his blatant lying!! The smirk on this APPP's face all through the interview shoes he uses it as a weapon to lie and he has siphoned off taxpayers money his entire bogus career pushing this TOTAL bullshit!! All is known! > 21C Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Physica www.academia.edu/12805065/21C_Philosophiæ_Naturalis_Principia_Physica
You're still tied to the fallacy that space is absolute so you imagine length contraction is the same thing as your idea of distance constriction and that's just not true. Just as the astronaut notices nothing wrong with his measure of time and space (because there isn't), he would notice something wrong that you're not seeing about your measure of space and time. And it's not an imaginary mental exercise - we've confirmed the effects with high speed, high precision clocks in space.
@@Ni999 Space is as relative or as absolute as time is relative or absolute. And chemistry does not care about inertial frames. For chemistry it is irrelevant: the experimenter observes and calculates to what's happening to both twins. So if the two twins are at Cape Canaveral, in a biochemistry lab, and their chemistry parameters are (continually) measured as one of the twins is preparing to enter the rocket that will catapult him toward Alpha Centaur at 75% of the speed of light and back in 4 years, the experimenter will continually observe parameters of the traveling and domestic twin as time allegedly slows down on the ship (and the length constricts correspondingly). What experimenter sees is that concentrations of compounds responsible for ageing are higher in the body of the traveling twin than his brother on Earth. For if that is not correct, then by the same token there is no time dilation on the ship as seen by the experimenter on Earth. There cannot be half-truth.
@@Burevestnik9M730 Atomic clocks say that atoms absolutely care about relative frame differences. Odd that atoms do and so do the rest of the atoms and molecules in the spacecraft holding the clocks that have proved that yet you insist that the rules suddenly change for chemistry.
The only reason that the twin paradox is discussed is because it's easier to imagine, it's not actually a paradox. One twin has accelerated to fly away, and turned around by decelerating and accelerating again, and then decelerating to land. Special relativity does not apply to accelerating frames of reference. Here's the real version of the paradox - both twins appear to be in identical spaceships on parallel paths and they pass each other because they are heading in opposite directions. They have big picture windows to observe each other and have arranged to so when they pass. They are passing at a rate close to the speed of light. Each one sees the other and both experience the same things and come to the same conclusions - his ship is shorter than mine and his light clock (they each had one) is running slow, and my ship and my time are unchanged. Further, he must be the only one in motion, none of my senses or instruments can determine that I'm moving - I was asleep and woke up on this ship that appears to be floating alone in deep space.
That's the real paradox.
And that's all that they will ever know, unless one of them goes through acceleration and turns around to meet up with the other. And the one who turned around and caught up with his brother will be younger.
No special chemistry rules are going to change that nor are they going to invalidate the the thousands of ways observed millions of times that both special and general relativity seems to be exactly how spacetime and everything in it works.
Magnets exist because special relativity is a real thing. GPS works only because corrections for special relativity (satellite speed compared to yours) and general relativity (time dilation due gravity differences) are taken into account. If the spacetime you occupy at the moment you are reading this compressed or expanded or oscillated you would never know it. You would have no chemistry tests to detect it. And yet we have interferometers that measure it happening.
Your argument is about what you insist biochemistry would do in a thought experiment that has never occurred. Mine is based observed facts and the best explanations we have for them, and I kindly think that you are unaware of the existing data. The twin paradox is a teaching aid for what we've already observed, designed to help beginners start to grasp the subject. If it violated chemistry then our observations would have never occurred in the first place.
(edited because of a bad autocorrect, any remaining typos I own)
@@Ni999 Atoms are of no concern to chemistry. Chemistry is about molecules, temperatures, pressures, volumes, concentrations. Ageing is about chemistry and biochemistry and not atoms, quarks etc. There is non-relativistic chemistry.
My experiment is a thought experiment just as Einstein's.
There is no paradox. Chemistry slipped the mind of Einstein. Analogy: Zeno paradox. According to this "paradox", the man would never move from the initial position A when contemplating to get to B position. Resolution: time was not accounted for in this "paradox". in the same fashion, chemistry was not accounted for in Einstein's twin "paradox". There is no paradox once you understand chemistry.
time doesn't exist. it's a construct of the mind, of human consciousness. and consciousness is fundamental. i take no notice of time what so ever. it's so confusing and creates too much anxiety. better to live in a "timeless" world where by you do not stick to dead lines / time tables etc. once you do that, once you free your mind of this man made concept THEN you have peace of mind.
He has an 'appropriate' name - GROSS! What an appalling Academic Public Purse Parasite (APPP)! He lies that time exists, solely to grovel to the Einsteinisn lie that time exists!! TIME DOES NOT EXIST, OR MOVE!! TIME IS DISTANCE, NOTING MORE!! Einstein 'CONCOCTED' the Space-Time lie because he could NOT demonstrate time exists or moves!! The lying catholics in 325AD 'CONCOCTED the same 'Blessed-Trinity' fraud because the 'god' lie could not be true; it is INVENTING a further more inexplicable lie to allegedly explain the original lie!! That's why this APPP threw in 'String-Theory' (with its attendant '11' dimensions bullshit), to cover his blatant lying!! The smirk on this APPP's face all through the interview shoes he uses it as a weapon to lie and he has siphoned off taxpayers money his entire bogus career pushing this TOTAL bullshit!! All is known! > 21C Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Physica www.academia.edu/12805065/21C_Philosophiæ_Naturalis_Principia_Physica
An interesting view from Dr. Gross. He confirms what Carlo Rovelli wrote on "The Order of Time". Highly recommended !
Ciao Carlo
-0:past ; maitrey:present ; +0: future
Loved this interview. Yet what David says that spacetime has to be a block universe and the brain causes the illusion in a biological way to a moment of now is just his preference, as Robert tries to point to as well. It is mysterious and makes in no way sense, just as much as an actual shared now doesn't make sense in our current GR framework (it does in QM however). So either GR has to accommodate to our human reality, or according to David our human reality needs to accommodate to GR mathematical physics. However: mathematics can be transformed into hyperplanes etc. But the knowledge that we all share a now at this moment cannot, for if this were not the case for all of us at this moment, this would imply solipsism and would render all people around us as mere zombies, illusions of consciousness which are actually not concious. And this can NEVER be the conclusion. Being human should be primary for a human, in my opinion, and denying it to other people should be illegal almost.
Time is money
dick cheney looking a lot slimmer and smarter than last time i saw him
good for him
Time is complete, are we maybe just reviewing what’s clearly collapsed as playback, live. For some reason...
Time is a faculty of mind. Not like the 5 senses or memory, but it has something to do with the linguistic mind. The basis of language is the associative faculty of mind. The faculty that associates a sound with an animal or other entity. Taken to its ultimate meaning it classifies this as that or this is that.
The impression of change: aging, motion, discovery; the evidence that our 5 senses present to us is real. But some of the things of the senses are presented by "things in themselves" and others by self-reflecting or self-referring things.
Heat as presented by the sun or fire or lava is real. Is a shadow real? What about a reflection in a mirror? The illusion of water presented by a mirage, a rainbow are they real?
Reality is not readily available to human beings. What is real is real sequentially and contingently. Death is not real till it happens. It seems to me that mirrors, shadows, rainbows and mirages are not illusions. They are not false impressions of reality. It seems to me that they are impressions of our limited capability of apprehending reality.
A clock is an illusion. It is a false impression of time, it is our own mind's reflection of nature. A mirror reflects nature. Language reflects our mind reflecting nature - it is a false impression of reality. If time does exist, what mirror can hold its reflection long enough for our eyes to see its impression?
We will all get swallowed up by time one day. Time is the name of the shark in the ocean that wants to rip you to shreds.
I know what it is. But it's hard to explain. But i'm gonna try to explain it in a theory. You are conscious. Your own zero point. And everything around you no matter what has also it's zero point. But because we have distance in between those two points the information has to travel a certain distance to connect to eachother. And because of that distance that what has given of information. Is already in another place than it whas before. while the other point precieve that what has given of information. Is still at that point that it precieve to be. But it's not because that information hasn't reached the point of perspective.
And this is how time realy is: what you precieve in your perspective. Doesn't exist enymore because of the distance in between. But still happening to you, because you can precieve the information that has given of traveling that distance.
And here is the freaky part (don't read if you're scared to be alone!): if the two zero points of perspective don't touch eachother one of the two points doesn't realy exist. And because you are your own zero point with matter in between. You will never touch another zero point.
And for that. You are alone in the presence. And you react to what happend in the past.
how can time be real ? the past doesent exist the present doesent exist(because its gone in a nanosecond and the future doesent exist therefore time must be false
What is so bizarre to me (about our so-called reality), is that after BILLIONS of years of Cosmic Evolution, Our own Planetary and Human History. . .we have somehow ended up with . . ."Taco Bell"......WTF ?!?!? Life has got to be a comedy.
I think the problem is because we separate events by meaning, we assume time itself segments itself along those lines also. This is most likely not true. The only thing that transcends the “motion” of time is human subjective experience which remains constant throughout . If I could take a guess, I believe time maybe just an overlapping of different dimensions simultaneously. The distant past is literally spatially distant which is why we have the impulse to call it “distant “. Also I believe that if the past were truly evolving into the future, you would think that all of reality would be unfolding in front of our eyes in a motion going forward sort of like a curtain opening
He has an 'appropriate' name - GROSS! What an appalling Academic Public Purse Parasite (APPP)! He lies that time exists, solely to grovel to the Einsteinisn lie that time exists!! TIME DOES NOT EXIST, OR MOVE!! TIME IS DISTANCE, NOTING MORE!! Einstein 'CONCOCTED' the Space-Time lie because he could NOT demonstrate time exists or moves!! The lying catholics in 325AD 'CONCOCTED the same 'Blessed-Trinity' fraud because the 'god' lie could not be true; it is INVENTING a further more inexplicable lie to allegedly explain the original lie!! That's why this APPP threw in 'String-Theory' (with its attendant '11' dimensions bullshit), to cover his blatant lying!! The smirk on this APPP's face all through the interview shoes he uses it as a weapon to lie and he has siphoned off taxpayers money his entire bogus career pushing this TOTAL bullshit!! All is known! > 21C Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Physica www.academia.edu/12805065/21C_Philosophiæ_Naturalis_Principia_Physica
@@GlennFloyd Interesting, I thought the same exact thing myself. The only thing that can exist is the present subjective experience And if time Truly existed, I think we should be aware of it somehow like we are aware of light which seems to be transcendent of time somehow. Time is just a word and I think we have a bad habit of letting words trick us into believing that it ( labels) is the absolute definition of something. Even our memories of the so-called past are present subjective experiences
I have always found the “if you kill your grandmother “ excuse against time travel nonsense. If you travelled back in time she stopped being your grandmother because she has not traveled to the point In which she will be. If you kill her someone else was your grandmother you just don’t know who until you travel to that point.
What an appalling Academic Public Purse Parasite (APPP)! He lies that time exists, solely to grovel to the Einsteinisn lie that time exists!! TIME DOES NOT EXIST, OR MOVE!! TIME IS DISTANCE, NOTING MORE!! Einstein 'CONCOCTED' the Space-Time lie because he could NOT demonstrate time exists or moves!! The lying catholics in 325AD 'CONCOCTED the same 'Blessed-Trinity' fraud because the 'god' lie could not be true; it is INVENTING a further more inexplicable lie to allegedly explain the original lie!! That's why this APPP threw in 'String-Theory' (with its attendant '11' dimensions bullshit), to cover his blatant lying!! The smirk on this APPP's face all through the interview shoes he uses it as a weapon to lie and he has siphoned off taxpayers money his entire bogus career pushing this TOTAL bullshit!! All is known! > 21C Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Physica www.academia.edu/12805065/21C_Philosophiæ_Naturalis_Principia_Physica
No because you have her genes, you would change everything even just walking in the streets. The only option in which a backward time travel can exist is creating an alternative reality, one in which a guy that arrive from another dimension popped out into existence in a new (just created) dimension. Maybe a human similar to you being will born later (if you didnt interfere too much with their story) but would be different even just for your presence somewhere.
@@francesco5581 you do not have her genes because she has not traveled to the point in time to birth your parent. The problem is consciousness and the physical body are a pair. Your memory of her as your grandmother is false until she actually becomes your grandmother. If you erase her someone else was your grandmother.
@@dueldab2117 does not seems logic to me because who i am is by genes too, also that would mean that one person who makes the jump back change the existence of the whole universe... imagine if everyone start to jump back ...
And by saying this btw time travel can't be possible. Because you must get to the edge of existance in an instant. To reach up to what still didn't happen yet. and make letting it happen.
(And because there isn't a edge to something that is infinite.) It is impossible to do.
P.s. i hope all cientists will respect this with an open heart. And move on to invent stuff that does have nothing to do with time travel to go to other planets so that the human race can spread out like we are suposed to do to survive the population grow. Like every living organism. You don't see those asking for money to spead out.