Harriet Hageman Touts Bill Requiring Agencies To Disclose Economic Effects Of Regulations
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 25 дек 2024
- During a House Rules Committee hearing earlier this month, Rep. Harriet Hageman (R-WY) spoke in support of the Prove It Act.
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
account.forbes...
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: / forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: / forbes
More From Forbes: forbes.com
She rocks !
Harriet Hageman is a STAR.
..thank you WYOMING !
Thank you, Harriet!!!
A far better representative than Liz Cheney could ever have been.
Amen
Sadly that's not a very high bar 😂
Show your work Act!! It’s so shameless that an Act is required for these Bureaucrats YET in K-12 math requires that every student show their work as to how they derive at the number/answer!!
Love and Respect to Harriet Hageman!
Wow. U need to run. Common sense.
Harriet Hageman is a real attribute to this country. She's a very smart woman.
There are way too many regulations on everything and so bad for business
It's bad for everyone.....
I get why they were seen as a good thing at 1st but as time has gone forward they became progressively more ridiculous and made it harder and harder for smaller businesses to become profitable and competitive thus ensuring these bigger companies had less and less competition and could monopolize on the market.
What a brilliant Congresswoman!!!
This should happen and efficiency and very high productivity needs to be the key to every government employee
Rep. Hageman is always the smartest person in the room.
Harriet Hageman is one of the best I’ve seen in 60 years 👍🇺🇸
cooking the books , liberals
CUT ALL FEDERAL TAXES ON ALL AMERICANS.
Thank you Rep Hage an
Representative Hageman is SO great an improvement over disgraced Liz Cheney! If the people replaced RINO's and Democrats with people of Rep. Hageman's quality, the Republic would be well on its way back to fiscal and moral health. Her work thus far is OUTSTANDING!
THE DAYS OF BEING A CORRUPT CRIMINAL ARE OVER! CASE CLOSED!
Regulations are not Laws, and "Chevron is overruled" per Clarence Thomas & the Supreme Court 👊
how about BANNING any agency from creating regulations.....that is a power for CONGRESS.......agencies (if they are even constitutional) have the power to enforce properly enacted regulations
What? You want to make Congress actually WORK! And be attributable for the chaos they create? Shame SHAME!
That’s actually a sensible bill
Problem is, they don't know the effects of their regulations.
Then they can’t enact any regulation at all u til they do know the effects
Great replacement for Liz.
That sounds like a great bill!!!!!
Every dime should be accounted for if not then agency has questioned and ones responsible for not keeping track be held accountable the government expects us to be completely accurate with our taxes least they can give us the same respect
Thank you Miss Hageman for being on top of things. You should throw your hat into the House Speaker ring.
There are several hard core women that should be Speaker..
Long overdue
She is a smart gal...enjoy listening to her.
Harriet Hagerman for Doge!!!!
Love Hageman, she is a very bright individual and a true patriot.
Love Harriet.
Hi.
That would be interesting.
12.25.24 Date? Committee?
Wish Australia did this as our Government is way out of control. 🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺
Republican lawmakers are asking for military assistance President Biden, today is the day American people realize who is in control of military intelligence to government affairs
If you want 4 opinions on the economy ask 2 economists. This bill is pointless
I can’t figure out why Trump hasn’t tagged this lady for some position in his cabinet?
Because she is smart
Thanks for the analysis! I have a quick question: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). What's the best way to send them to Binance?
Get the lie detator, it will short out from all there lies
Well tat regulation by itself will cost millions of dollars. Lol
True. But is also might, just might slow down the proliferation of unnecessary regulations.
I agree, but this is only a starting place.
Duh
This is an anti-regulation idea sponsored by a generally anti-regulation person. It raises any number of issues, the most important probably being: how do we measure the economic cost of regulations? Suppose a regulatory agency requires expensive retrofits/additions to certain machinery to make them safe. That's as far as Hagman wants to go, I suspect. But to take into account the full cost--or get a true accounting--of the additions, one must look at the economic benefits of imposing such a regulation. Foremost among these might be, e.g., 12 hands and 140 fingers saved over the course of 10 years. There is an economic cost to the loss of these hands and fingers, isn't there? And isn't even that cost a bit hazy, as one does not know exactly how to limit the time frame? (Should we include lost wages for only 10 years? How about for the working life of the injured worker?) Does Hagman propose to attempt to measure this cost, too? I think we know the answer. She wants to keep everything as simple as possible so that we end up thinking that most new regulations are a bad idea. (If we could come up with a good faith formula for regulatory costs, I would favor that, but I don't trust Hagman to do it.)
No one asked you. You lost the election. These are OUR people doing what we hired them to do.
Im in awe of this woman. I look at her and I'm jealous of her commom sense brilliance and beauty. Said it before, shes gonna turn me straight if shes keeps it up lol. Merry Christmas hegeman. What a woman.