Mr Hannan, as your leader failed to get the boundaries changed Tories need 42% to Win GE2015 outright, no pollster at any time has predicted a Tory win, so NO Referendum, DC can wriggle out. Come & join us, Douglas Carswell & Mark Reckless in UKIP.
So you're saying that the Conservatives aren't going to be successful enough to definitely be able to give us a referendum, so we should vote for UKIP - a party with zero chance of having any real influence in parliament after the next election - instead? Where's the logic in that? If you want a referendum that much, you should be fiercely attempting to pursuade Labour voters to vote Tory. It's the only way. Also, your figures are dodgy. It all depends on how much of the vote Labour get and if Neil Kinnock showed anything it's that even Labour party voters swing away from an awful leader in the run up to an election. Tories can get a majority with much less than 42%.
wow i really disliked the section of Hannan talking about UKIP. he is obvious an UKIP dude himself just in denial for too long now. your party the conservatives WONT change :P so you have to change Dan
wow i really disliked the section of Hannan talking about UKIP. he is obvious an UKIP dude himself just in denial for too long now. your party the conservatives WONT change :P so you have to change Dan
+Jan Oostdam to further clarify: without the rise of UKIP there wouldnt be a referendum and Dan would still be holding great speaches in name of the wrong party in the EU parliament.
As an outsider(Australian) I have to say both Hannan and Farage are very very good. Wish we had them!
Same here. It seems we haven't dwindled far enough down the rabbit hole yet to really draw the talent out.
Mr Hannan, as your leader failed to get the boundaries changed Tories need 42% to Win GE2015 outright, no pollster at any time has predicted a Tory win, so NO Referendum, DC can wriggle out.
Come & join us, Douglas Carswell & Mark Reckless in UKIP.
So you're saying that the Conservatives aren't going to be successful enough to definitely be able to give us a referendum, so we should vote for UKIP - a party with zero chance of having any real influence in parliament after the next election - instead? Where's the logic in that? If you want a referendum that much, you should be fiercely attempting to pursuade Labour voters to vote Tory. It's the only way.
Also, your figures are dodgy. It all depends on how much of the vote Labour get and if Neil Kinnock showed anything it's that even Labour party voters swing away from an awful leader in the run up to an election. Tories can get a majority with much less than 42%.
I hope Daniel has designs on becoming the Tory leader and as prime minister can then smack arse.!
Good speech. UK must vote to leave the EU in June.
wow i really disliked the section of Hannan talking about UKIP. he is obvious an UKIP dude himself just in denial for too long now. your party the conservatives WONT change :P so you have to change Dan
wow i really disliked the section of Hannan talking about UKIP. he is obvious an UKIP dude himself just in denial for too long now. your party the conservatives WONT change :P so you have to change Dan
+Jan Oostdam to further clarify: without the rise of UKIP there wouldnt be a referendum and Dan would still be holding great speaches in name of the wrong party in the EU parliament.