Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) Rule 105 - Limiting instruction

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 7 сен 2024
  • WELCOME to my “Federal Rules of Evidence” program for students interested in the evidentiary rules that govern trials in federal court. "Federal Rules of Evidence" is a series of 12 playlists (with many videos) designed to introduce viewers to the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE), as well as evidentiary concepts and arguments under the FRE. The 12 playlist topics are set out below in this description.
    This playlist covers FRE Rules in Article I (General Provisions) & Article II (Judicial Notice). This video covers FRE Rule 105 - Limiting instructions.
    This playlist (organized by FRE rule/concept) for Articles I & II features the following videos:
     Rule 103. Rulings on evidence
     Rule 104(a). Preliminary questions - judges may consider inadmissible evidence
     Rule 104(b). Preliminary questions - conditional relevance
     Rule 105. Limiting evidence that is not admissible…. for other purposes
     Rule 106. [Rule of Completeness] - Remainder of or related writings or record[ing]
     Rule 201. Judicial notice of adjudicative facts
    The channel features several videos within each of these 12 playlists:
     Intro to FRE Rules & Concepts *(start here)*
     Articles I & II - General & Judicial Notice
     Article IV - Relevance & 403
     Article IV - Policy rules
     Article IV - Character evidence
     Article V - Privileges
     Article IV - Witnesses
     Article IV - Impeachment
     Article VII - Opinion testimony
     Article VIII - Hearsay - definition/exemptions
     Article VIII - Hearsay - exceptions
     Articles IX & X - Authentication & Original doc
    ABOUT ME:
    Professor Wes Porter served as a trial attorney with the Department of Justice's Criminal Division, Fraud Section, in Washington D.C., the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Hawaii and the JAG Corps for the U.S. Navy stationed in the Trial Service Office Pacific. After lecturing and teaching as an adjunct professor for years, he moved to academia full-time teaching courses in Evidence, Criminal Law and Procedure, and skills courses like Trial Advocacy. Professor Porter earned tenure, became a full professor of law, and led a center devoted to evidence, litigation and trial skills training.
    Professor Porter still teaches in law schools and trains lawyers new to the profession. To contact Professor Porter with questions or video topic requests, you may email him at wesreberporter@gmail.com.
    ©Wes R. Porter 2020. All rights reserved.

Комментарии • 1

  • @freeairbreather2657
    @freeairbreather2657 2 года назад +1

    It seems the problem will remain if Proponent breaks promise, that the jury canniot unhear it and may still be persuaded.