Ryzen 5500 great value for little money, buy a used one for 50 euros, for 1440p it is good, there are not many differences in games, in my opinion the i7 is the worst, for a few more frames the 5600 consumes almost double and the i7 almost triple, and still people saying yes the cache of the 5500 with this very efficient architecture
Those tests are odd. There's no consistency, some runs have different times of the day (Valheim) with very weird gpu usage where with 9700K and 5500 it's maxed out unlike 5600, therefore not fully cpu-bound. Gpu usage maxed out in Forza Horizon 5 with 9700K, so these numbers are more like a margin of error than 9700K's true cpu limit. Some games straight have max gpu usage and you can't let every cpu spread its wings for a comparison, in others there's a cpu limit and the video manipulates into thinking there's either no differnce between them or one is just better. That's imcompetent testing. 5500 is a lot slower than 9700K in general, due to its smaller cache it's closer to zen2, which is known to be absolutely slower than intel's 9th-10th gen. I can't trust those tests.
@@mikiloboda 9700K is roughly around 5600, maybe slightly better when both max oc'ed. 5500 doesn't have enough cache as 5600 to compete with 8700K/9700K and both have significantly worse memory latency than these i7s
@@HeartOfAdeII You sound like an intel fanboy. The 5500 is as fast or faster than the 9700k. Not everything is cache related. The 5500 has lower latency timings than the 9700k because its a monolithic design(meaning everything is in one chip). The 9700k uses basically 3x the power. I have watched multiple videos and the 5500 is as fast or faster than the 9700k and its 1% and 0.1% lows are way better.
@BladeCrew what? Thanks for teaching me what monolithic means. 9700K is also monolithic, and has significantly lower memory latency and faster core interconnect. There's literally nothing in 5500 that makes its monolithic design superior, it's got worse latency all across the die just like the rest of zen 3 with its awfully slow infinity fabric. My 9900KS 5.2ghz 4.9 ring/4266cl16 33.7ns (aida64) beats my friend's memory tuned 5700X3D in half the games out of like 15 while giving better lows in the MAJORITY of them. 9700K is barely slower than my cpu, and 5500 is barely even faster than 3600 while even 8700K beats the entire Zen2 lineup in games. And you telling me that 5500 beats its lows 😂 intel ring bus was (and still is) the king of 1% lows especially with tuned memory. Bla bla power consumption. Okay? 9700K has lower idle power as well while being a "snappier" architecture. But who cares if it's still faster overall? I really don't care how you're calling me. People accusing of fanboysm are usually the ones that focus on brand loyalty too much. I don't care whether amd or intel is better. I care only about the truth. And there's only one. 😁 9700K when cpu limited is a faster cpu than 5500.
@BladeCrew if you want to truly educate yourself on cpu performance, stop consuming data from random sources. Instead find the most trustworthy ones that show bios, subtimings, etc., that tune memory, voltages and so on. Only then you can genuinely know if the test is correct. Even largest techtubers like HUB and GN utterly fail when taking into account the complexity of the workings of the cpu. The only channel that currently has my trust is i2hard.
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
Timestamps:
➤ Red Dead Redemption 2: 0:00
➤ Rainbow Six Siege: 0:56
➤ Valheim: 1:51
➤ Warzone 2.0: 2:50
➤ Apex Legends: 3:49
➤ Cyberpunk 2077: 4:50
➤ Forza Horizon 5: 5:48
➤ GTA 5: 6:46
Ryzen 5500 great value for little money, buy a used one for 50 euros, for 1440p it is good, there are not many differences in games, in my opinion the i7 is the worst, for a few more frames the 5600 consumes almost double and the i7 almost triple, and still people saying yes the cache of the 5500 with this very efficient architecture
Cold ❄ cpu 5500 stabilite
Why the Ryzen 5500 is getting better fps ( fps 1% and fps 0.1%) than the Ryzen 5600?
good question
It can be. Because R5 5500 has single chip. 5600 is a chiplet-based
Woww @@Minidrony
Those tests are odd. There's no consistency, some runs have different times of the day (Valheim) with very weird gpu usage where with 9700K and 5500 it's maxed out unlike 5600, therefore not fully cpu-bound. Gpu usage maxed out in Forza Horizon 5 with 9700K, so these numbers are more like a margin of error than 9700K's true cpu limit. Some games straight have max gpu usage and you can't let every cpu spread its wings for a comparison, in others there's a cpu limit and the video manipulates into thinking there's either no differnce between them or one is just better. That's imcompetent testing.
5500 is a lot slower than 9700K in general, due to its smaller cache it's closer to zen2, which is known to be absolutely slower than intel's 9th-10th gen. I can't trust those tests.
Lol 5500 has got more cache and is better than this i7 with no hyper threading
@@mikiloboda 9700K is roughly around 5600, maybe slightly better when both max oc'ed. 5500 doesn't have enough cache as 5600 to compete with 8700K/9700K and both have significantly worse memory latency than these i7s
@@HeartOfAdeII You sound like an intel fanboy. The 5500 is as fast or faster than the 9700k. Not everything is cache related. The 5500 has lower latency timings than the 9700k because its a monolithic design(meaning everything is in one chip). The 9700k uses basically 3x the power. I have watched multiple videos and the 5500 is as fast or faster than the 9700k and its 1% and 0.1% lows are way better.
@BladeCrew what? Thanks for teaching me what monolithic means. 9700K is also monolithic, and has significantly lower memory latency and faster core interconnect. There's literally nothing in 5500 that makes its monolithic design superior, it's got worse latency all across the die just like the rest of zen 3 with its awfully slow infinity fabric.
My 9900KS 5.2ghz 4.9 ring/4266cl16 33.7ns (aida64) beats my friend's memory tuned 5700X3D in half the games out of like 15 while giving better lows in the MAJORITY of them. 9700K is barely slower than my cpu, and 5500 is barely even faster than 3600 while even 8700K beats the entire Zen2 lineup in games. And you telling me that 5500 beats its lows 😂 intel ring bus was (and still is) the king of 1% lows especially with tuned memory.
Bla bla power consumption. Okay? 9700K has lower idle power as well while being a "snappier" architecture. But who cares if it's still faster overall?
I really don't care how you're calling me. People accusing of fanboysm are usually the ones that focus on brand loyalty too much. I don't care whether amd or intel is better. I care only about the truth. And there's only one. 😁 9700K when cpu limited is a faster cpu than 5500.
@BladeCrew if you want to truly educate yourself on cpu performance, stop consuming data from random sources. Instead find the most trustworthy ones that show bios, subtimings, etc., that tune memory, voltages and so on. Only then you can genuinely know if the test is correct. Even largest techtubers like HUB and GN utterly fail when taking into account the complexity of the workings of the cpu. The only channel that currently has my trust is i2hard.
9700k 4700😅😅😅 5000! 👍
AMD is slapping Intel silly in gaming.
Yeah, i7 from 2018 vs cheap ryzen from 2022 lmao
AMD is slapping Intel silly in gaming.