The Bair-Fulton Arithmetician Calculator No. 6

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 19 янв 2025

Комментарии • 23

  • @stephenfreeborn
    @stephenfreeborn Год назад +2

    Looks good. What a unique design.

  • @HanhanPx
    @HanhanPx Год назад +4

    This is probably the most beautiful calculator I have ever seen

    • @GillAndBurtTheCop
      @GillAndBurtTheCop Год назад

      Have you ever seen a human brain?

    • @HanhanPx
      @HanhanPx Год назад +1

      @@GillAndBurtTheCop it's moist and squishy

  • @ChrisStaecker
    @ChrisStaecker Год назад +1

    Very cool design- I'd seen pictures of these but I never looked closely and assumed it was like a typical dial machine.

    • @jaapsch2
      @jaapsch2  Год назад

      To be honest, so did I until I saw a photo of the No. 11 desk model (seen also in the ad at 07:48) which has three rows of dials, and grooves for the stylus connecting the left of one row to the right of the row above it.

  • @aydink7739
    @aydink7739 Год назад +2

    I like the fact that your software polyform puzzler played a role in finding a aperiodic monotile (Einstein) 👏🏽

  • @emdxemdx
    @emdxemdx 6 месяцев назад

    :) I remember playing with an addiator-like calculator (Magic Brain?) more than 50 years ago, and around the same time, I had a teacher who had a miniaturized plastic version of the Pascaline. I recall understanding instantly how it worked.

  • @DavidFrostbite
    @DavidFrostbite Год назад +1

    I really like how compact the Addiator is for a fully mechanical thing

  • @tylerg8305
    @tylerg8305 Год назад +1

    Excellent video. I love your channel. Thanks for what you do.

  • @speedydai8929
    @speedydai8929 Год назад +7

    So no one’s going to talk about how 92+9 isn’t 202? What caused the skip?

    • @topaz-rn
      @topaz-rn Год назад

      Good catch, idk either

    • @davidmason5163
      @davidmason5163 Год назад

      Hadn't reset properly.

    • @artkek
      @artkek Год назад

      Shouldn't it be 101? Where'd you grab another 100 from?

    • @jaapsch2
      @jaapsch2  Год назад +7

      Oh dear. It did get to 201 instead of 101. What is happening here is that the two dials slightly rub against one another and just turning the tens dial caused the hundreds dial to click one step further.

  • @TaramiBedona
    @TaramiBedona Год назад +2

    Really appreciate the cleverness of the mechanism but yes it is a bit of a solution looking for a problem. It reminds me of what we In software engineering call the XY problem (or fallacy);: How can I do X (implement a slide adder) using Y (a dial mechanism)? The answer is that you probably shouldn't; you design a traditional dial adder instead.
    Enjoyable video as usual, thanks 😊

  • @robertg8331
    @robertg8331 Год назад +1

    Gosh, what an unusual mechanism - thank you for showing this one. Very ingenious (if ripple-carry is the main daily task).
    (My first reaction btw was; golly, where do you find these things!? :-)

    • @jaapsch2
      @jaapsch2  Год назад +1

      I got this one on eBay from another collector. It was not cheap, cause due to its rarity it is one of the few that costs many times more now than when it was new.

  • @erintyres3609
    @erintyres3609 5 месяцев назад

    The wood frame is nicely finished. But if I had to add a column of numbers, I don't think that this machine would be much help at all.

  • @365Condoms
    @365Condoms Год назад +1

    clip your nails, dude

    • @jaapsch2
      @jaapsch2  Год назад +3

      Why should I? They are useful.

    • @365Condoms
      @365Condoms Год назад

      @@jaapsch2 don't want to konw :)
      nice video though

    • @Stan_sprinkle
      @Stan_sprinkle Месяц назад

      @@365Condomsguitar