11 card 1980s PSA Reveal- our worst yet

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 29 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 64

  • @oldnewrips
    @oldnewrips 10 месяцев назад +1

    Thanks for sharing guys! Sorry, those were some tough grades. Hopefully your 70s return is much better. Take care and good luck!

    • @CardCollectingDuo
      @CardCollectingDuo  10 месяцев назад +1

      Thanks Lance, it is a different grader I am sure, because it is taking much longer. We'll see but I am not very hopeful...

  • @diamondstatecards
    @diamondstatecards 9 месяцев назад +1

    Tough luck guys. One of our 80s subs was pretty similar to this. Some of those looked really good. Keep it going though!

  • @wcsaa-tv4808
    @wcsaa-tv4808 9 месяцев назад +3

    Those grades are mainly because of the centering on the back of the cards.

    • @CardCollectingDuo
      @CardCollectingDuo  9 месяцев назад

      You think? That could be. I probably didn't pay enough attention or ignored centering issues on the back. Thanks for watching

  • @eltoroloco1936
    @eltoroloco1936 8 месяцев назад +1

    Thanks for sharing, you're not taking into account top to bottom centering on many of your cards. For the 82's, the surface usually has a slight issue. I always look at PSA 10's on eBay to determine centering

    • @CardCollectingDuo
      @CardCollectingDuo  8 месяцев назад

      Yeah I thought there might be a problem with the surfaces. Thanks for watching

  • @timothyfritsch8801
    @timothyfritsch8801 8 месяцев назад +1

    hello
    i have some of those and others butt i am way way far away from the states i lost my job so,,,,,, what can i do with this collection like yours they went from the pack into sleeves they all look great who could tell i sure dont know anything about card grading please keep me inmind if you or any friends need something nobody could ever sell cheaper then me as here there only be good as kindling

    • @CardCollectingDuo
      @CardCollectingDuo  8 месяцев назад

      I learned from my submission that 80s cards have more defects than you see at first and aren't worth the cost of submitting. Good luck with yours, I hope you can do better than I did

  • @dero0808
    @dero0808 9 месяцев назад +1

    I opened some sealed boxes (1989/1990/1991) from my childhood last time I went to my parent’s house…they are literally flawless, other than centering. I’m planning on sending in the best cards, and am nervous to see what that gets me.

    • @CardCollectingDuo
      @CardCollectingDuo  9 месяцев назад

      Good luck, hope you do batter than I did. All those 82 Topps cards were from cello packs we ripped. Maybe if yours are from wax or rack packs they will be in better condition.

  • @ToddRhodeswas_here
    @ToddRhodeswas_here 10 месяцев назад +1

    I just got back my 80's grading special and got crushed. I have never received so many 7s in a submission. The order flew thru PSA and it makes me wonder if they are just pushing orders our the door (most especially with these $15 specials) with more speed and less accuracy (and potentially newer graders). I literally will lose $400 if I resell at current values.

    • @CardCollectingDuo
      @CardCollectingDuo  10 месяцев назад

      Oof, that sucks. I lost money on this one too probably, maybe some of the 8s could sell for more than $15 but even that might be tough. I also wonder if they are harsher when grading as part of monthly special... shouldn't be the case but maybe you are right, they get so many that punish the sender...

  • @CoreyInCreamCity
    @CoreyInCreamCity 10 месяцев назад +2

    I just got back my 80s special sub not too long ago. I did a vid on it. didn't hit a single 10 either. Basically turned out to be a break even. As only one card was for my PC. My best advice is always assume one grade lower than you'd hope for. Then check comps to make sure at minimum you can break even on them. Those 82s are gonna be tough to sell. Rose might be okay. Unless it's a huge pull, I'm done sending in 80's and early 90's card. The juice ain't worth the squeeze. Better luck on your next sub. Cheers!

    • @CardCollectingDuo
      @CardCollectingDuo  10 месяцев назад +1

      Yeah I just watched your reveal, I agree with you, even though you in general did a little better than me. I probably wasn't strict enough in my submission.

  • @paolosstore
    @paolosstore 10 месяцев назад +1

    Brutal man. Such a hard racket sometime. Really hard, feel your pain. Guess we all need more powerful magnifying glasses?

    • @CardCollectingDuo
      @CardCollectingDuo  10 месяцев назад

      Ha, thanks very much... need something to magnify to find the defects that PSA finds that I can never seem to see when inspecting

  • @Time2Rip
    @Time2Rip 10 месяцев назад +1

    I feel your pain. I haven't done older card grading, ive heard vintage is quite a bit tougher but I am not sure why. Still nice cards.

    • @CardCollectingDuo
      @CardCollectingDuo  10 месяцев назад

      Thanks, I do more vintage than modern. I should stick with 60s and earlier, and ultra modern probably

  • @CardManic
    @CardManic 9 месяцев назад +1

    Im so sorry guys. That mj looked good. The bo jackson is a favorite too. Im wishing you both better, better luck on your next sub

    • @CardCollectingDuo
      @CardCollectingDuo  9 месяцев назад

      Thanks so much Mike... I almost didn't post this video...

  • @robertpomerhn4570
    @robertpomerhn4570 9 месяцев назад +1

    The 86 mattingly is 85/15 top to
    Bottom. Keep your head up

    • @CardCollectingDuo
      @CardCollectingDuo  9 месяцев назад

      yeah other people noticed that too, I thought PSA was more lenient on the backs, guess not

  • @lorenanders702
    @lorenanders702 8 месяцев назад +1

    I remember those Carltons, the chopped off arm look!

    • @CardCollectingDuo
      @CardCollectingDuo  8 месяцев назад +1

      yeah, to kid in the 80s it was memorable look!

  • @Ripping4Rutschmans
    @Ripping4Rutschmans 7 месяцев назад +1

    Nice Smith rookie and Jordan. I guess send some of those to SGC. PSA is so random.

    • @CardCollectingDuo
      @CardCollectingDuo  7 месяцев назад

      Yeah I am using SGC more now. Thanks for watching

  • @jeffstanners981
    @jeffstanners981 9 месяцев назад +1

    How much do they factor the centering on the back? Must be substantial with the back of that Mattingly.

    • @CardCollectingDuo
      @CardCollectingDuo  9 месяцев назад

      Yeah someone else said that too, I probably underestimated that factor

  • @GM-og4ih
    @GM-og4ih 9 месяцев назад +4

    They should give you reasons why a card gets a low-grade

    • @CardCollectingDuo
      @CardCollectingDuo  9 месяцев назад

      Exactly... very frustrating getting them back with no explanation.

  • @ticc2354
    @ticc2354 9 месяцев назад +1

    That was hard to watch. I’ve been there. Sorry man. Thanks for posting.

    • @CardCollectingDuo
      @CardCollectingDuo  9 месяцев назад

      Thanks I appreciate it. It is hard for me to watch too, I didn't even really want to post for a while...

  • @MikelTulp
    @MikelTulp 9 месяцев назад +1

    I feel for you, I got a 5 on a new card, who knows?

  • @LeeCopus
    @LeeCopus 9 месяцев назад +1

    Brutal, absolutely brutal.

  • @thomaschesser4475
    @thomaschesser4475 10 месяцев назад +1

    Should've went with Degreegrading. Much better and more accurate than PSA.

    • @CardCollectingDuo
      @CardCollectingDuo  10 месяцев назад

      thanks, I don't know that one but must be better than PSA

  • @cacsports
    @cacsports 10 месяцев назад +1

    I see what you mean. Fun cards though.

  • @TF_TV
    @TF_TV 10 месяцев назад +1

    My 80s submission was similar 😢

    • @CardCollectingDuo
      @CardCollectingDuo  10 месяцев назад

      Yeah I think they are getting stricter, I don't think I will send in 80s cards for a while. Thanks for watching

  • @cloudsey420sufccards
    @cloudsey420sufccards 10 месяцев назад +1

    Sorry about the grades. Sweet cards though bud. 👍

  • @ScottGenX
    @ScottGenX 9 месяцев назад +1

    you cant have the back so off center in the back. wow do ya not look at the back? The Don Mattingly 6 card. Looked like a 6 to me.

    • @CardCollectingDuo
      @CardCollectingDuo  9 месяцев назад +1

      I tend to miss these things, always thought PSA was more lenient with OC backs...

    • @eltoroloco1936
      @eltoroloco1936 8 месяцев назад

      Back can be 90/10 from PSA 9 on down but that one looked pretty bad. It was the centering on the front that was low, looked 80/20 at best

  • @DetroitDrillSGT
    @DetroitDrillSGT 9 месяцев назад +1

    That's tough, sorry man

    • @CardCollectingDuo
      @CardCollectingDuo  9 месяцев назад

      Yeah took me a few days to get over, and no more 80s card submissions for me lol. Thanks for watching.

  • @CallieandJordanSquad
    @CallieandJordanSquad 10 месяцев назад +1

    Oh wow a slew of sixes

  • @zambino8763
    @zambino8763 8 месяцев назад +1

    just be more critical...not all cards are 9 and 10. i seen flaws as soon as they were shown, and I'm not using a microscope

    • @CardCollectingDuo
      @CardCollectingDuo  8 месяцев назад

      Yeah I was overly optimistic and definitely missed some flaws. Learned a bit for next time if there is a next time

  • @10thinningcards
    @10thinningcards 9 месяцев назад +1

    Outside of the Bo Jackson if you feel it’s a potential 9 or 10, none of these cards should have been sent in for grading.

    • @CardCollectingDuo
      @CardCollectingDuo  9 месяцев назад

      Very true, I thought the 82s were all sharp would get 9 or 10, I was surprised at how far off I was. The only one I thought would not get 9 or 10 was the Gibson rookie, which I added to get to the 10 card minimum. And maybe the Larry Bird.

    • @mitchellriles
      @mitchellriles 9 месяцев назад

      There is no problem send in any card if the plan is yo keep it

    • @ryansaturday9072
      @ryansaturday9072 9 месяцев назад

      PSA is really tough on 80s and 90s cards. I have sent in a lot of 80, 81, 82 etc and get a LOT of 8s and an occasional 9. Somehow I landed an 86 Donruss McGriff in a 10 but I was shocked.

  • @WesAndSherrySportsCards
    @WesAndSherrySportsCards 9 месяцев назад +1

    That was rough. Makes me think they hold grades down in case of pop counts.

    • @CardCollectingDuo
      @CardCollectingDuo  9 месяцев назад +1

      Yes they probably do, and was rough indeed, my last 80s submission for a while. Thanks for watcing!

    • @WesAndSherrySportsCards
      @WesAndSherrySportsCards 9 месяцев назад

      @@CardCollectingDuo you’re welcome. The BJackson Topps RC is my favorite looking card from the 80s.

  • @lykaojalao2733
    @lykaojalao2733 6 месяцев назад +1

    You got robbed by psa