It was a good practice, once you do an After Action Report for this tsunami, you can improve on the citizenry level. You hadnt defined "High Ground" people need to always know where they "High Ground", is at, depending on their location. High ground is dependent on your location, so if you are in a 5 story building, 2 miles from the coast, no need to leave. Maybe the word ground is throwing people off. Go back to the emergency plans and teach the community how to know where the highest points in their communities are at.
Right ! They should figure out routes for us… I heard traffic was horrendous… what if a tsunami comes and we’re all in traffic! Then we’ll flood in our cars and that will be a tragedy… hopefully our smart Bay Area leaders can figure that out for us!..
Exactly--we need to know who needs to go and where they should go to. I live in the East Bay Hills, so I was pretty sure I was out of the danger zone, but a lot of people in downtown SF, apparently, weren't sure whether they should evacuate or stay. We're not used to getting tsunami warnings--so I think there was a lot of unnecessary worry.
I mean, how much preparation can really be done apart from warning people via automated text that a tsunami may be coming after an earthquake? We saw on live cam and the news that many people actually went TO the ocean to check it out. How are you going to ever help those people?
@timjacob great point. People who go toward the water need to understand that they will be physically overwhelmed, they will be killed, they will die, if a tsunami arrives. PERIOD! "Higher ground" means an awareness of immediately surrounding topography. You have to use your brain and your own eyes, to know where to run, higher up! You're going to have to rapidly hike UPHILL and you might even have to climb a little or a lot! If people don't "get that," you're right, you're never going to help those people.
that entire area has to be the most prone to tsunami if it was to hit anywhere on the west coast, they made the right call. However with that being said the infrastructure in the case of an evacuation wouldn't do much you need larger roads going inland only open only during tsunami warnings. One way straight inland. Because that entire area would be underwater with ease
They are hyping this up like they hyped up covid fears. These people cannot think for themselves and nothing burgers are the hottest selling item on their menu.
tat ca cac con tren the gioi .nghe ro ..Ong se khong dung tat cho toi khi nao loai nguoi cac con gap Ong ngay nay. _Mat troi tren dau cac con .hien than .viet nam Cty.
I would say no, or extremely low risk. Cupertino's elevation is high enough and its location is far enough away from the Bay that it's not likely. If in doubt during a warning, look at those hills to your west and get to them quickly....even if that means on foot. I would say, though, not to worry. If you happen to be right at the Bay or over at the Pacific Ocean, literally run for any hills or higher ground you can find!
It's been decades since I've been to Pacifica. Tsunami warnings should alert you to start running ON FOOT, not "everyone jump in your cars and sit in gridlock and get swept away to your death." I'm assuming there are areas not too steep to climb on foot, aside from the shear cliffs, correct? I could be wrong.
This isn't adding up. How does a 7.0 earthquake off the coast NOT trigger a tsunami? I have family that still lives in Sonoma County. Thankfully 80% of the coastline there is steep cliffs that a tsunami would have very little effect against besides erosion.
Plate tectonics involves many phenomena, slip/strike (what happened), subduction (one going under another) sea floor spreading (mid-ocean rifts) orogeny (mountain formation) etc. For a real wicked tsunami you need a subduction collapse, whereby the sea floor is either heaved upwards by the underriding plate, or collapse, lowering of sea floor suddenly. Massive water displacement occurs, and kinetic energy set in motion. Off the Oregon coast the San Andreas converges with the Cascadia Subduction Zone, so while the SA is a sideways moving system, Cascadia brings subduction into the mix, so until the location of the quake is precisely determined up there, you could have or not have a tsunami. Best to take precautions, once the wave is in motion it covers distance fairly quickly. Here inside the Golden Gate, the effects would be mitigated first by the narrowness of the Gate itself, and then the Bay opens up into a vast body of water that would absorb a lot of volume without drastically raising water levels. Of course, folks in SF's Sunset District would be in great danger, maybe Sausalito and Richardson Bay could face problems, but again, most vulnerable are immediate coastal areas. Stinson Beach, Halfmoon Bay and so on.
I Think It Was A Good Drill. Now Every One Not Going To Make It, Many Will Die Being Stuck In Traffic Jam And Everyone Dying On The Road Not Far From There Home. This Is A Dam Shame.
Was in Alameda when this happened. The near gridlock was a bad sign. Limited escape options. However, the prospect of Alameda being inundated with 10 feet of water is very, very remote. Bay topography mitigates volume of ingress through the Gate by spreading it over a vast inland body. Hard to picture a Fukushima type event there. I wasn't impressed with how people reacted, panic and irrational behaviour. Media outlets have a tough time balancing fact with drama, drama gets viewers and ratings.
It was a good practice, once you do an After Action Report for this tsunami, you can improve on the citizenry level.
You hadnt defined "High Ground" people need to always know where they "High Ground", is at, depending on their location.
High ground is dependent on your location, so if you are in a 5 story building, 2 miles from the coast, no need to leave.
Maybe the word ground is throwing people off.
Go back to the emergency plans and teach the community how to know where the highest points in their communities are at.
Right ! They should figure out routes for us… I heard traffic was horrendous… what if a tsunami comes and we’re all in traffic! Then we’ll flood in our cars and that will be a tragedy… hopefully our smart Bay Area leaders can figure that out for us!..
Exactly--we need to know who needs to go and where they should go to. I live in the East Bay Hills, so I was pretty sure I was out of the danger zone, but a lot of people in downtown SF, apparently, weren't sure whether they should evacuate or stay. We're not used to getting tsunami warnings--so I think there was a lot of unnecessary worry.
They were not ready. ❤
At all.
Ticking timebomb shrouded in denial.
Democrats never are, just just talk the talk, and never actually walk the walk....
@@az55544That's the Democrat party in a nutshell
Just like on November 5th
Are they ever
I mean, how much preparation can really be done apart from warning people via automated text that a tsunami may be coming after an earthquake? We saw on live cam and the news that many people actually went TO the ocean to check it out. How are you going to ever help those people?
@timjacob great point. People who go toward the water need to understand that they will be physically overwhelmed, they will be killed, they will die, if a tsunami arrives. PERIOD! "Higher ground" means an awareness of immediately surrounding topography. You have to use your brain and your own eyes, to know where to run, higher up! You're going to have to rapidly hike UPHILL and you might even have to climb a little or a lot! If people don't "get that," you're right, you're never going to help those people.
that entire area has to be the most prone to tsunami if it was to hit anywhere on the west coast, they made the right call. However with that being said the infrastructure in the case of an evacuation wouldn't do much you need larger roads going inland only open only during tsunami warnings. One way straight inland. Because that entire area would be underwater with ease
High Ground, to me is HWY 280😬
The city is not tsunami ready
So why did the Tsunami peter out, if it existed in the first place.
Its nonsense.
Nonsensical gibberish is why
Oh my.
Sometimes they just “Peter out” Jim.
They are hyping this up like they hyped up covid fears. These people cannot think for themselves and nothing burgers are the hottest selling item on their menu.
I received a dire get to high ground immediately warming on my phone right after i saw on live news that the tsunami warning was cancelled.
tat ca cac con tren the gioi .nghe ro ..Ong se khong dung tat cho toi khi nao loai nguoi cac con gap Ong ngay nay. _Mat troi tren dau cac con .hien than .viet nam Cty.
The Marina, Pier 39 and all of Embarcadero will be scary spots be in a tsunami.
people are more ready for looting than preparing for any emergency issues in the bayarea
No one on Geary blvd was carrying
Another false alarm
These people can't go 5 minutes without screaming that the sky is falling.
@@ryanward8039 Like Newscum at the border yesterday
What a scare to receive that warning!
Is Cupertino at risk?
I would say no, or extremely low risk. Cupertino's elevation is high enough and its location is far enough away from the Bay that it's not likely. If in doubt during a warning, look at those hills to your west and get to them quickly....even if that means on foot. I would say, though, not to worry. If you happen to be right at the Bay or over at the Pacific Ocean, literally run for any hills or higher ground you can find!
I think that was a test but there's something on its way for real.
me say, go to mountain
Me say Mountain Dew
Learn to swim
Learn to swim
Learn to swim
Most people work so unless they have "To Go" bags in their cars they will be left unprepared.
My dear warnings have been issued north east south west🎉
What Person(s) Told These People To Go Higher Ground, People Should Not Move And Do Your Investigations Before Listening To False Reports!
Authorities alerted people. It was initially not clear how dangerous this would be because the earthquake that generated was close to the ca shore.
Don't forget the dehydrated soy milk for that go bag😅
Quality joke!
Pacifica residents should just drove up to Skyline college or surrounding areas....why even try to escape on lower elevation like highway 1?
It's been decades since I've been to Pacifica. Tsunami warnings should alert you to start running ON FOOT, not "everyone jump in your cars and sit in gridlock and get swept away to your death." I'm assuming there are areas not too steep to climb on foot, aside from the shear cliffs, correct? I could be wrong.
Aftershock
In case of evacuation, where to go?
Amercia! Texas sounds great!!!
texas is a wasteland lol. dry, dusty, hot, and gay.
Until tornado season rolls around...
Can tell just by the way that guy talks he's from the Bay Area😅
One ☝️
OOooooooh tsunami! tsunami! head to higher ground! tsunami!!!!!!!
grow mangrov forest along coastline
AŞAĞIDAKİLERE MERHAMET EDİNKİ. KÖKDEKİLERDE SİZE MERHAMET ETSİN.
This isn't adding up. How does a 7.0 earthquake off the coast NOT trigger a tsunami? I have family that still lives in Sonoma County. Thankfully 80% of the coastline there is steep cliffs that a tsunami would have very little effect against besides erosion.
i guess it wasnt the tsunami causing type of earthquake
Go look for scientists specialists about tsunamis.
Plate tectonics involves many phenomena, slip/strike (what happened), subduction (one going under another) sea floor spreading (mid-ocean rifts) orogeny (mountain formation) etc. For a real wicked tsunami you need a subduction collapse, whereby the sea floor is either heaved upwards by the underriding plate, or collapse, lowering of sea floor suddenly. Massive water displacement occurs, and kinetic energy set in motion. Off the Oregon coast the San Andreas converges with the Cascadia Subduction Zone, so while the SA is a sideways moving system, Cascadia brings subduction into the mix, so until the location of the quake is precisely determined up there, you could have or not have a tsunami. Best to take precautions, once the wave is in motion it covers distance fairly quickly. Here inside the Golden Gate, the effects would be mitigated first by the narrowness of the Gate itself, and then the Bay opens up into a vast body of water that would absorb a lot of volume without drastically raising water levels. Of course, folks in SF's Sunset District would be in great danger, maybe Sausalito and Richardson Bay could face problems, but again, most vulnerable are immediate coastal areas. Stinson Beach, Halfmoon Bay and so on.
Is this in Buffalo 🤔
Is it a Blue City? then the response was poor.
Always is
Heard it was a blue tsunami to go with that education you have under your belt 😅
@@dalejohnson537 what ?
All for nothing 🙄
Why bring boats ashore? They are safer at sea.
Perhaps, perhaps not?
Because they are liberals.
@@michaelcook6288 and they are all about as sharp, logical,patriotic, trustworthy and attractive as Jellyfish 🪼🪼🪼🪼
"PANAMÁ 🇵🇦 RELOCATION TOURS!!(VIDEOS) WITH JACKIE!!😊👍🇵🇦❤️👈🙋"
I Think It Was A Good Drill. Now Every One Not Going To Make It, Many Will Die Being Stuck In Traffic Jam And Everyone Dying On The Road Not Far From There Home. This Is A Dam Shame.
Was in Alameda when this happened. The near gridlock was a bad sign. Limited escape options. However, the prospect of Alameda being inundated with 10 feet of water is very, very remote. Bay topography mitigates volume of ingress through the Gate by spreading it over a vast inland body. Hard to picture a Fukushima type event there. I wasn't impressed with how people reacted, panic and irrational behaviour. Media outlets have a tough time balancing fact with drama, drama gets viewers and ratings.
Tsunami tax.
"5 REASONS TO GET PANAMÀ 🇵🇦 RESIDENCY!!(VIDEOS)😊👍🇵🇦❤️👈🙋"
Climate change?
@@tonygoulart3693 😄
Ah, no. Big no. This has been going on for hundreds of millions of years. Can't blame humans, we're just along for the ride geologically! Cheers
@johnbuckles1344 i meant it to be sarcastic...
@@tonygoulart3693 I know. Carry on!