Fun fact! The first draft of the Jumper Script was apparently much more faithful to the book, before Doug Liman said, "Interesting... let's change this that and the other thing." Almost like he didn't know it even *had* a source material. By the time they were ready to shoot, the whole thing had been planned out as a trilogy of movies, with this one solely existing to set up the other two (something you should only do when filming them simultaneously, otherwise you risk not getting your sequels greenlit, and leaving one dorky little hangnail of a movie as your franchise's only legacy). They weren't done there, though. According to Jamie Bell (who holds the distinction of being the only remaining cast member after the film was scrapped and recast) he had been given at least 12 vastly different rewrites of the script since he'd signed on to play Griffin. Even then, he himself was very badly juggled around by the production, as evidenced by his five minute on set rant in the bonus features, as well as a clip of the producer patting him on the shoulder and saying, "Don't worry. Tomorrow, we'll try and find something to do with you." The author himself was still a good sport about the whole thing though, and even wrote a spinoff novel set in the film's universe called "Jumper: Griffin's Story" (as was pointed out in the review.) However, I doubt he was all that keen on the film as in the behind the scenes featurette "Jumping From Book to Screen" he referenced James M. Cain's famous quote about Hollywood ruining his books: "They didn't ruin anything. My books are right there on the shelf. They're fine."
GrimSister i distinctly remember the second movie had a script so close to the book that it may as well have been the manuscript of the book... then empathy link no translate and change and change later we got not adaptation
"I'm different!" *starts up flamethrower* Gotta admit, that was a great moment. Griffin is a psycho, but that's much more entertaining than the other main characters here.
Dayton Pfeifer except the introduction of Jamie bell's character and the fact the lead's mom is a Templar complicate things by a ridiculous amount, so is it technically undermining your audience's intelligence by introducing just as complicated and complex questions?
name recognition. It happens all the time, and not just in movies, but games too, where a company will take a well known IP and milk the fact that it already has a established fanbase.
I'm gonna get hate for this. Even though you pointed out the problems in the movie, I still enjoy watching it. However, you definitely got me interested in reading the book.
I also really liked the movie! Action, special effects, powers and how they used them in fights as well in heist. That is the movie that ignited my love for power of teleportation - "I'm going for a breakfast in france and then i'm going to read a book on the head of the sphynx". And the fact they leave scars like there really was a wormhole there... how they can stack up shortjumps to gain momentum, awesome!
Him teleporting to "stack up momentum" is pretty pointless, to the point of being counter productive. In the books Davy/David experiments with his ability and discovers he retains no momentum between a jump (e.g. He jumps off a cliff, drops for a second or two, then jumps back to the top, still in open space, but hangs for a second before gravity pulls him back down again.) The third book really delves into that aspect of his ability, and depending on when it came out the director may have even pulled this technique from there as their executions are similar.
Definitely read the book. I saw the movie first and thought it was painful. Then i found the book (in my library, ironically) and thought "how bad is the book?" Now i'm in love with the book series and try to read everything by the author. The difference is like comparing I, Frankenstein the movie to Frankenstein the book: they have a similar name, i guess? But they're so different they're even in different genres... The Jumper book is gritty, grounded, and can be a slow burn for some. Even the ending feels kind of unresolved and realistic (as much as a book about teleporting can be :)
@@bladetytan9025 Well we know Griffin has already figured out how to maintain (and maybe add) momentum between jumps like Cent does in the later books because he's jumping a car around as it's driving.
@@MrRtkwe Been awhile, but i think the part i was talking about is his teleport-charge punch he does during one of the fight scenes, if he was doing it to generate momentum it's pointless. One jump is all that would be needed, Jump in front of his target and add x momentum in y direction at his target, done. Also, with the car scene, iirc when Griffin Jumps the car in the air i don't think it carries on moving, he Jumps it up and it hangs there before he jumps it back down somewhere else. This point is countered by the fact that the car carries on moving fine after landing as the wheels should likely spin a bit before regaining traction. (Might not, i'm not sure about the physics of traction in that scenario.)
"How many lives he ruined from all those bank roberies" Eee… None. Money in banks is insured. I guess insurence companies can feel some itching, but I can insure you it's not very noticeable. Sorry for the pun.
@Mr. TAD Yeah, but he is just a one guy. I know he stole alot for a one guy, but he is still just a one guy. I doubt he could ever steal as much to cause this kind of problem, since even his luxury life is quite inexpensive, in the grand scheme of things.
Book David is a nerdy book reader and jumps to the library because it's the one place he feels safe. He never floods it or anything else like that. >_< Thanks movie!
bradwolf07 It is symbolic. The villains are religious zealots. Religious zealots burn books. David is the hero, so he does the opposite of burning books.
YES FUCKING PLEASE! I follow both channels and these guys almost never (or at least rarely) review the same stuff! They both have their own style of doing the same thing, which would make for a very interesting crossover.
I read the book years before the movie came out. I legitimately had this thought while reading it, “they should make this into a movie. Wait no, they shouldn’t they couldn’t get away with this in a movie.”
Had similar thoughts reading the Dune books series, was such a great movie in my mind but I thought, 'they can never really do a good movie with that book, it's really all in the books and the mind'.
It's nice to hear a critique of this terrible movie that doesn't just extend to "Hayden Christensen can't act." Oddly enough, his performance is one of the few saving graces of this film for me. He actually looked like he was having fun in the role and is thus the only reason to maybe possibly think about watching clips of this movie...Someday. The book sounds way better, I may check it out someday.
This is the only film I've ever seen (in the theater) that truly disappointed me, and I'd never even heard of the book or knew this was based on one. Also Jamie Bell is the best thing about this movie.
Kind of want a pseudo sequel where there's some changes. Also jubilee's powers are amazing if you know how to use them(jubilee could make plasmoids with the power of explosive grenades but she's a pacifist by nature)
I think in the movie where he jumps a quarter of a building, is like a super move that he didn’t know about that he just unlocked which makes him unique jumper than all the rest
It feels like the director wanted to direct a x men film Abd just took book premise and tried to make it moreLike that Heck the paladins feel more like the purifiers from the xmen comics.
He was abusive, but it wasn't entirely his fault. All he knew in his life was abuse and he didn't really know what a loving parent looked like. Still a good person deep down, but not without his ugly qualities.
Thanks! I knew from the word go that I'd be using that track somewhere. I'm surprised more people didn't latch on to the Father Son track afterwards, though.
(youll have to forgive the lack of enters/ spaces between the paragraph 's in this in this response. for some reason my computer doesn't save them in my youtube comments) I wouldn't say that's 100% true. even in the first GOTG movie we see Yondu threaten and bully quill hell he even slaps him a few times. and even in GOTG 2 we see there is a disconnect in Yondus actions and words , quill says right to his face that he was often frightened of Yondu growing up. For example Quill: You threatened to eat me Yondu: that was funny Quill: it wasn't to me and you can see how surprised Yondu was to hear this, he never even conceded that outcome. the thing with abuses is that they don't often see themselves as abusers, they like all people rationalize their actions. I making this person stronger, I'm better than the alternative. If I didn't do this this person would fail so I have to do it. so on and so on. just because Yondu didn't give quill to Ego, doesn't really mean he all that much better. yes quill forgave Yondu at the end and quill himself is what we would call an unreliable source of information but we cant help be see the damage Yondu's kind of 'parenting' had on quill. and we see the same kind of abusive relationship between Thanos and Gamora its even worse there as Thanos truly believes he's the hero of his own story so everything he's done to Gamora, Neblua and the other's is justified in his mind. in fact now that I think of it Quill, rocket and Gamora were all products of abusive relationship's. Quill had Yondu, rocket had whom ever turned him into rocket and Gamora had Thanos
The movie is definitely one big 'blah' but Griffin is a magnificent bastard. I like how they make it a point that he's willing to accept David because he's a fellow jumper but he's still a major psychopath and won't hesitate to kill David if he gets in his way. Wish we got more of him.
So did I. David, as presented in this movie, was a genuinely horrible person with no regard for the lives of others, and Samuel L. Jackson was doing the world at large a service by putting a stop to his dangerous irresponsibility.
WenLi Yang That is why the movie made him a religious Zealot. It was afraid the viewers would not understand he was supposed to be the bad guy if he was an Interpol agent or a bounty hunter hired by banks wanting their money back.
@@schwarzerritter5724 Talk about messing up when you can't even deliver to the viewer who's the good guy and who's the bad ;) It's one thing when it's characters in the grey area and the viewers are supposed to make their own decision, but that's not the case here, it's just a fail.
Scott Summers It’s because the movie did such a horrible job at characterization and setting up the conflict. The only two Jumpers we get to know are unrepentant thieves who endanger and kill others without remorse. Griffin likely killed two people and endangered dozens more from just his on-screen car stunts, plus he threatened to leave Millie to die on Everest just because she was involuntarily brought to his lair. Who knows how many other people he’s killed through carelessness or to cover up carelessness? David, despite his claim about not being a killer, likely killed Roland by stranding him in that cave; it’s unlikely Roland could have escaped on his own. That’s the third on-screen time he abandoned someone in an inaccessible location. He could easily have killed several people like that. These two men are menaces to society. The Paladins’ methods are absolutely extreme, yet all evidence we were given points to their motivations - protecting the world from super powered criminals - being sound. Given how Jumpers need to be contained by electrocuting them, the alternative to killing them would be years or even a lifetime of torture. The Paladins may have viewed death as the more merciful option. All in all, even if we disagree with how they complete their mission, it’s still not hard to root for them. I think the movie could have cleared this up by just showing us one Jumper who wasn’t an unrepentant criminal. What if a Jumper really had come to save people from that flood, only to get caught and executed by the Paladins? It could even have been that Jumper we saw Roland shank near the start of the movie. This would have properly demonstrated that the Paladins are executing innocent people simply for possessing ability, regardless of whether that ability is used responsibly.
I saw this movie with a girl who was a friend of my brother. I remember making jokes about it with her. I think that was actually the last time I saw her. Hmmmm, weird. Maybe she jumped to a new life Anyway, I'm glad you were finally able to post this.
Can we admit that skywalker's acting is kinda on point in this film. When his mom showed up in the room, the surprise, and fear are clear as day and he doesn't need to say anything. And how he says "mom" hit me.
i think i was a freshman when i watched the movie, and my naive young mind was too entranced in the action scenes and the fantasy of teleportation to see all that was wrong with it. i'm kind of glad though because if I hadn't liked the movie so much I probably never would have decided to read the book a few years later, it became one of my favorites.
The premise, the action, and Jamie Bell as Griffin were the best part of this movie. While I like this movie for the most part, I hope they do a remake in the future that explores the premise a little better. It would benefit from a remake.
That spin-off book Griffin's Story is actually pretty good, though I might be biased since I read it before the original book. I think that's that sign of a good author. Hollywood makes a horrible movie 'based' off your book. Then you write a pretty good book 'based' on the horrible movie.
but like who wouldn't want to pick jubilee? ignoring the fact that she was a kick as vampire for a while, her "lame" mutant power gives her the ability to explode sub atomic-particles and create immense chain reactions capable of leveling buildings and potentially worlds. her little light shows are plasma nukes, she can make nuclear explosions that do not emit harmful radiation. in practice she has caused people holding hostages to explode without harming the hostages, how is that not a rank A power?
Everyone knows that Marrow's powers is where it's at. :| "I was 15, what would you have done with Teleportation powers?" Good question, I don't know. I'd probably spend a good few hours thinking of what I'd even do with it. Maybe It's because I'm autistic, maybe because I'm paranoid (Probably both.) I'd think of how I could easily use my powers to make me money that is neither Illegal nor morally dubious (These kind of powers could be easily used to get around certain loopholes about traversal as well afford me certain advantages no one else could do.). I'd also probably use them to go visit a list of places I want to see (Scotland, Ireland, Wales, Cornwall, Isle of Mann, Finland, Greenland (I like the cold.), Christian Holy Sites (I might as well if I can just teleport anywhere.), Italy, Greece, Spain, Portugal, and wherever else that'd tickle my fancy.). Probably use said wealth to afford decent, but not extravagant housing and pay off various house and car loans for the family. (I value pragmatism.) because anything extravagant would cost too much and would arouse suspicion and I really don't need it. But Robbing a Bank or being a Creeper is not how I'd use them, even as a 15 year old as my mind hasn't changed particularly much since then. .........Man, I spent way too much time contemplating that. How that Goober never get's noticed till Samuel L. Jackson I cannot begin to fathom. "They've been hunting us since Medieval times." Stop, Stop, Stop.......... There were jumpers in the age where no one had the tech or weapons to properly fight let along track a Jumper? How did one of them never use their powers to become some sort of Sorcerer/Wizard King? Just imagine a Jumper in Medieval Axum, Just Conquering all of Arabia by Sowing Chaos amongst the enemy Nobility via a mixture of Stealth Jumping and given the time probably assassinations to destabilize their realms and then just conquer the entire peninsula. Likewise, Imagine if Hannibal Barcid, his son, or one of his soldiers could just Pop over to Rome with some Troops and just take out the Roman Leader. Bam! Carthage beats Rome. Like, this is some Timeline altering shit that would happen if this power was real and was a thing back then. That's like the tip of the Iceberg of how that could and probably would change history. There's no way Medieval Knights/Inquisitors could catch a jumper easily. Holy shit Movie.
you underestimate religion (they would be considered witches/demons/dijins/etc) and power of assassination. Also how few of them they are, there were three in the whole world. Just look for the king with demonic powers and spread the news how he is a monster worshiping satan. Heck Vlad the Impaler could be jumper not vampire.
When Michael Rooker was first mentioned I said to myself it would be funny if he reference the "i'm marry poppins yall" moment from guardians. Low and behold, Bravo! 🤣
It’s about three miniutes into the video that I realised ‘jumper’ is referring to someone who jumps and not a thick wooly sweater as it’s called a jumper in England and Australia. I was so confused for a good while haha
@@KrimsonRogue This is late but I actually thought of a fun magic system based off of sweater (not quite clothing actually) So basically the magic of this universe is made available through natural materials and subsequently clothing. And the more well made clothing made by trained weavers, the better and easier the magic inside it can be used and manipulated. Since it takes time for any weaver or tailor to become trained and a master, and clothing made by ametures can cause the magic to backfire if not weaved correctly, thus high quality magic clothing were only made available to the nobles and royalty. Clothing for normal people usually have some magic in it (as it's still made from natural materials) but the magic can at most help people heal faster or keep warmer. Whilst the high quality clothing for nobles can allow them to fast track plant growth or blow fire and just much more elaborate and powerful. There are clothing made of certain materials made available to people who do a specific job as 'uniform'. Blacksmiths for example have aprons with fire resistance magic and shopkeepers have outfits that allow them to subtly read someone else's mood or intent to better serve them or aware of potential shopkeepers. Well weaved pieces of clothing are passed down the generation, from matriarch to patriarch, from grandparents to grandchildren. When clothing become unable to be worn, it will be cut up and each member of the family will be given a piece of the fabric as keep sake, turned into headbands or sewn into other clothing. When the industrial ages arrived and massive weaving machines that could weave powerful magic into cloth just like any master weaver, magic then that were only available to the top of the hierarchy where made available to the everyday man. (more powerful magic were also used in wars by soldiers and not just commanders and had a big effect on how massive battles are fought as well) This of course is amazing, making this previously exclusive powerful to everyone but this also brought on the age of fast fashion. Machine woven is fast and reliable, able to pump out many times over the amount a normal weaver can make a day but the quality in the fabric created is not the same. They often don't last nearly as long as man weaved cloth and the magic in the clothing, though powerful, are not able to be manipulated. Ultimately its a critique on fast fashion as well as the up and down side of clothes made by massive conglomerations that show no care towards the clothing made nor the workers in the process.
Thanks for reviewing the book and movie. Jumper is one of my favorite novels, and the movie just butchered it. I really wish they could've kept the terrorism plot in some form along with Davy jumping NSA agents around the world and the final confrontation between Davy, his father, Brian Cox and Rashid Matar. The film wasted so much potential. Keep up the good work.
You know the whole idea that Roland is the good guy seems pretty legit. David and Griffin are assholes through and through. David stole millions of dollars and clearly had no regard for anyone he stole from. Milly and his mom are exceptions because he likes them. Griffin is very reckless with powers and we know he’s killed an innocent indirectly. The dude is clearly not in the right mind. Roland however has good reason to fear Jumpers and their powers.
In regards to "breaking canon" and "doing the impossible", that scene in the car is to explain that some Jumpers are able to do things that other Jumpers can't. Like being able to Jump moving objects being specifically pointed out comes across as an explanation that he's able to do something that others can't. This sets it up for David to be able to Jump a building later. Also, he's the freaking hero of the story, of course he's going to be able to do things that others can't!!! I always wanted a sequel to this movie because of show it sets David up as being the "Neo" of the Jumper universe. Though I gotta ask... how was it not painfully obvious that is what they were doing?
Thats because you, me and several others would love a Trilogy out of these movies or maybe a reboot of the first movie. Have you seen the RUclips premium original series IMPULSE?
Been a long while since I seen the movie. For the longest, I didn't even know the book existed until now. O_O Probably might give it another watch, I remember liking this movie a lot, most likely because of the concept. Think I might also give the book a try too. Honestly, I would love for this to be a comic book! That would be pretty cool. ^^
"I wish you you would step back from that ledge my friend. You could cut ties with all the lies that you've been living in. And if you do not want to see me again I would understand." Sorry, someone had to make a joke like that at some point.
I do like the idea of a movie adaptation at least changing it up a little bit, but it obviously has to make sense in the context of the story, and has to be ex excited properly, otherwise there isn't a point in making the change.
Hey don’t forget that there is now a RUclips show called Impulse. Based in the Jumper universe that doesn’t once reference David or Millie and just rolls with new characters and that show actually is really good but I would have loved if they had filled the source material and had created a jumper tv show which I think would have worked out better
One of the more aggravating things about that flood reference is that in later books, David spends a lot of time doing relief work in disaster zones by teleporting in supplies.
Read the book. It's a light and easy read with likable characters, some great action sequences, and some genuinely touching moments. Plus it's absolutely nothing like the movie, so it'll still be a brand new experience for you.
I could get down on the mother part of the story. That wasn't bad at all. At least they kept it brief rather than the primary focus since they changed it.
I didn't know it was an adaptation until I saw the book on a Goodwill shelf. Made me want to read it since I liked the movie...now I realize it would've been an Eragon situation all over again (that movie can burn in hell for what it did to the book).
I actually really like the movie and it made me wants to read the book, which is 100% better !! But the fact that the movie introduced another jumper and paladin is interesting.
It would've been good if they kept the NSA hunting David but only because they're headed in secret by the Paladins kind of like Abstergo being the modern Templar Knights hunting Assasssins for centuries.
Thoughts on the review: i was entertained by it and the ending part of the review was my favorite. Though before I saw this I didn't know this even existed but after this review I'm interested in checking out the first book.
I remember reafing something a long time ago about them drastically changing the plot due to 9/11. Which, assuming I'm not mis-remebering, makes sense. Terrorists hijacking airplanes was likely more palatable in 1992 than in 2006 when filming began.
The biggest problem with teleportation that story like this rarely talk about is what I call the leap of faith problem, you can jump to the same spot many times and be fine but at some point something or even worse someone is going to be in that spot and you end op occupying the same space and as physics tells us 2 objects can not occupy the same space at the same time, so best case scenario (if you ask me) you jump your self inside a newly placed pole or something get cut in half and die, worse case scenario you jump inside someone they go splat and you probable still die, really they only way to fix this is by using portals that you can see thru before going in or be able to see a live image before jumping, I don't know if the book had something like that and it's been a long time since I've seen the movie but I'm pretty sure the movie didn't have that so at least at some point some people should have gone splat. Edit: Also I had no idea BB guns could do that I always thought that at most it would sting a bit.
Honestly, I disagree. Nightcrawler, from what I remember, is just able to teleport exactly like this movie. Instead I think the problem is more that the elephant in the room is never addressed in any way. It's fine if there's that sort of risk involved, because all powers in superhero stories have drawbacks, but the story needs to state if that's the case and show the characters overcoming it. For example, My Hero Academia addresses this problem with Mirio. He has the ability to phase through things like a ghost, but like that implies, it also means that he risks sinking to the ground and suffocating and getting hurt by jumping into things and dying. He trains and uses his powers in such a way that risk is lessened if he actively thinks about his movements and steps. He's even able to sink into the ground and pop out and launch himself at people. Never read the book either, but I imagine an explanation like that would be in it.
dave could easily save those people from that flood, it makes me mad how thoughtless he is in this movie which is exact opposite from him from the book
I totally forgot about Rachel Bilson till the moment I watched your review. And interesting to learn that she and Hayden Christiansen were involved/married for 10 years too. Didn't even know that, lol and apparently Emma Roberts caused their breakup?! Bravo, Hollywood!!
5:33-5:41 And that's the point where I want to slap the director and shout at him that he's lost the right to make movies. Also, mutant whose powers I want: Magneto.
I saw the movie in theaters 3 times. My ex gave me the book years ago. I quickly noted differences like you said. I read the book twice it was so good. Your videos was great
Jubilee is the worst X-Man? Uh, maybe when you compare her to the heavy hitters, but compared to the ones you mentioned, at least she could theoretically do more with her powers.
I have vivid memories of watching this film, but I have no idea when, where, why, or how I came about it, because I have never heard of this movie before.
When the movie came out, I really enjoyed. it. I still do, to an extent, though it's more of a guilty pleasure now. Because I liked the movie so much, I purchased a copy of Griffin's Story I chanced upon in a dollar store. It uses the Paladins from the movies, but makes Griffin a more cautious character as it follows him from age 11 to young adulthood. There's a lot of cool stuff, like how he creates a hideout that's impossible without teleporting. I recommend it. At a later time, I borrowed the original book from the school library and loved it far more than I ever did the movie.
Tbh, if you look at this movie as a completely different standalone from the book, then it's just your average B-Grade action movie with the standard plot holes that commonly plague the 21st Century Media Outlets, in literally every department. From action to sci-fi and now even horror (Deep Blue Sea 2/Truth or Dare were terrible). I'm just one of those simple kids that think the kids in the 20th Century had it better, especially with golden titles like "Alien".
Fun fact! The first draft of the Jumper Script was apparently much more faithful to the book, before Doug Liman said, "Interesting... let's change this that and the other thing." Almost like he didn't know it even *had* a source material. By the time they were ready to shoot, the whole thing had been planned out as a trilogy of movies, with this one solely existing to set up the other two (something you should only do when filming them simultaneously, otherwise you risk not getting your sequels greenlit, and leaving one dorky little hangnail of a movie as your franchise's only legacy).
They weren't done there, though. According to Jamie Bell (who holds the distinction of being the only remaining cast member after the film was scrapped and recast) he had been given at least 12 vastly different rewrites of the script since he'd signed on to play Griffin. Even then, he himself was very badly juggled around by the production, as evidenced by his five minute on set rant in the bonus features, as well as a clip of the producer patting him on the shoulder and saying, "Don't worry. Tomorrow, we'll try and find something to do with you."
The author himself was still a good sport about the whole thing though, and even wrote a spinoff novel set in the film's universe called "Jumper: Griffin's Story" (as was pointed out in the review.) However, I doubt he was all that keen on the film as in the behind the scenes featurette "Jumping From Book to Screen" he referenced James M. Cain's famous quote about Hollywood ruining his books: "They didn't ruin anything. My books are right there on the shelf. They're fine."
I recommend reading some of Rick Riorden's emails from the time he had his books adapted to the big screen. The snark is very strong with that one
GrimSister i distinctly remember the second movie had a script so close to the book that it may as well have been the manuscript of the book... then empathy link no translate and change and change later we got not adaptation
Just watched the dvd extras and the writer was 100% ok with the changes made
@@rd-yr6ww
Wow he seems pretty cool
This director sounds like a fucking moron
Why would he go to Egypt if he..
Hates sand
to fight dio of course.
I should have seen that coming. But I laughed anyways.
I mean it’s coarse, it’s rough, and it gets everywhere
cool spot for cinematography shoots
The culture here in these comments is diverse. I will stay
A bizarro universe where Yondu and Martha Kent gave birth to Anakin Skywalker.
Jesus didnt see that till now
I'm Marry Popins Y'all !
And this led to Anakin having a daughter
Only to be hunted down by nick fury.
@@puddah8208 Mace Windu wanted payback.
"I'm different!" *starts up flamethrower*
Gotta admit, that was a great moment. Griffin is a psycho, but that's much more entertaining than the other main characters here.
What is even the point of buying the book rights if your gonna go off and do your own thing?
Brodie Crain Two Words:
CASH GRAB
Ask mcu
Dayton Pfeifer except the introduction of Jamie bell's character and the fact the lead's mom is a Templar complicate things by a ridiculous amount, so is it technically undermining your audience's intelligence by introducing just as complicated and complex questions?
name recognition. It happens all the time, and not just in movies, but games too, where a company will take a well known IP and milk the fact that it already has a established fanbase.
No. Fuck Twilight.
David teleporting into a library, ruin books is just the directors metaphor for the transition to film.
Haha, nice.
I thought the movie was good and might get me back into reading after college gave me book PTSD.
But I legit say Nightcrawler when asked the opening question.
Same! Teleporting would make my life so much easier ^^
I'm fairly sure most people did, lol. I sure did.
I'd say Professor X.
@@josiahklein70 I would prefer Jean Gray, you get a weaker level of Dr. Xs telepathy with telekinesis Telekinesis.
I'd say Rogue, if ya get past the drawbacks ya basically a power sponge that can chop and change what ya have for what ya need.
I'm gonna get hate for this. Even though you pointed out the problems in the movie, I still enjoy watching it.
However, you definitely got me interested in reading the book.
I also really liked the movie! Action, special effects, powers and how they used them in fights as well in heist. That is the movie that ignited my love for power of teleportation - "I'm going for a breakfast in france and then i'm going to read a book on the head of the sphynx".
And the fact they leave scars like there really was a wormhole there... how they can stack up shortjumps to gain momentum, awesome!
Him teleporting to "stack up momentum" is pretty pointless, to the point of being counter productive. In the books Davy/David experiments with his ability and discovers he retains no momentum between a jump (e.g. He jumps off a cliff, drops for a second or two, then jumps back to the top, still in open space, but hangs for a second before gravity pulls him back down again.)
The third book really delves into that aspect of his ability, and depending on when it came out the director may have even pulled this technique from there as their executions are similar.
Definitely read the book. I saw the movie first and thought it was painful. Then i found the book (in my library, ironically) and thought "how bad is the book?"
Now i'm in love with the book series and try to read everything by the author. The difference is like comparing I, Frankenstein the movie to Frankenstein the book: they have a similar name, i guess? But they're so different they're even in different genres... The Jumper book is gritty, grounded, and can be a slow burn for some. Even the ending feels kind of unresolved and realistic (as much as a book about teleporting can be :)
@@bladetytan9025 Well we know Griffin has already figured out how to maintain (and maybe add) momentum between jumps like Cent does in the later books because he's jumping a car around as it's driving.
@@MrRtkwe Been awhile, but i think the part i was talking about is his teleport-charge punch he does during one of the fight scenes, if he was doing it to generate momentum it's pointless. One jump is all that would be needed, Jump in front of his target and add x momentum in y direction at his target, done.
Also, with the car scene, iirc when Griffin Jumps the car in the air i don't think it carries on moving, he Jumps it up and it hangs there before he jumps it back down somewhere else.
This point is countered by the fact that the car carries on moving fine after landing as the wheels should likely spin a bit before regaining traction. (Might not, i'm not sure about the physics of traction in that scenario.)
"If your answer was 'the girls' locker room!, go stand in a corner!"
Me: *goes stand in the corner of girls' locker room*
Yes
You win 😂
Well played. Well played indeed
"How many lives he ruined from all those bank roberies"
Eee… None. Money in banks is insured. I guess insurence companies can feel some itching, but I can insure you it's not very noticeable.
Sorry for the pun.
@Mr. TAD Yeah, but he is just a one guy. I know he stole alot for a one guy, but he is still just a one guy. I doubt he could ever steal as much to cause this kind of problem, since even his luxury life is quite inexpensive, in the grand scheme of things.
why
Watch it David your inner Edward is showing
1 hour later
Oh hey Bella didn't expect to see you here
Oh, that scene where he jumps to the Library hurt. As an avid book reader, it hurt my soul.
Book David is a nerdy book reader and jumps to the library because it's the one place he feels safe. He never floods it or anything else like that. >_< Thanks movie!
bradwolf07
It is symbolic.
The villains are religious zealots. Religious zealots burn books. David is the hero, so he does the opposite of burning books.
I just pretended that they were all Twilight books.
Am I the only one who thinks that Krimson and the Dom would really like each other?
i want a colab to happen
YES FUCKING PLEASE! I follow both channels and these guys almost never (or at least rarely) review the same stuff! They both have their own style of doing the same thing, which would make for a very interesting crossover.
Yeah, both their reviews of Lynch's Dune was GOLD not to mention Percy Jackson!!
I shall now use this movie to describe what the Dom uses the In name only clause
Yes!!! Somebody NEEDS to make this happen!!!!
Pretty sure movie David can be summed up by this quote:
“He’s too dangerous to be kept alive!”
"I NEED HIM!"
Mace Windu wants revenge for being thrown out a window
Hahahahaha didnt connect that one till you pointed it out
Mace wants revenge for being thrown out of a Windu.
I'm just waiting for that to be canonized in some way.
'Paladins have been hunting Jumpers since medieval times.' Now there's a movie.
Sounds like an interesting book. I'll put it on my reading list.
"When adapting a book into a movie.....I like to throw the whole thing out and reinvent it...."
THEN WTF ADAPT THE BOOK JUST WRITE YOUR OWN STORY THEN
We are now looking at you, Chaos Walking.
*Cough* Witcher. *cough* Wheel of Time. *cough*
Dedicated to the memory of all those books ruined by David.
I read the book years before the movie came out. I legitimately had this thought while reading it, “they should make this into a movie. Wait no, they shouldn’t they couldn’t get away with this in a movie.”
Had similar thoughts reading the Dune books series, was such a great movie in my mind but I thought, 'they can never really do a good movie with that book, it's really all in the books and the mind'.
It's nice to hear a critique of this terrible movie that doesn't just extend to "Hayden Christensen can't act." Oddly enough, his performance is one of the few saving graces of this film for me. He actually looked like he was having fun in the role and is thus the only reason to maybe possibly think about watching clips of this movie...Someday.
The book sounds way better, I may check it out someday.
TheMovieDoctorful I love the book (and sequels) so much! Please give it a chance!
Read the book!
*obligatory meme
DEW IT!
Heh. Thin ice.
This is the only film I've ever seen (in the theater) that truly disappointed me, and I'd never even heard of the book or knew this was based on one. Also Jamie Bell is the best thing about this movie.
Seen Mortal Engines yet?
Teleporting is best super power ever!!
*Picks Up Phone*
"Um...Mr. Shape-shifting? You'd like to speak to Brett The best? One second please."
Foresight
Obviously reality manipulation
Immortality
Flight, seriously just that alone would be super OP in a world full of groundwalkers.
Kind of want a pseudo sequel where there's some changes.
Also jubilee's powers are amazing if you know how to use them(jubilee could make plasmoids with the power of explosive grenades but she's a pacifist by nature)
LOL! Mace Windu had opportunities to get back at Anakin Skywalker!
I think in the movie where he jumps a quarter of a building, is like a super move that he didn’t know about that he just unlocked which makes him unique jumper than all the rest
It feels like the director wanted to direct a x men film Abd just took book premise and tried to make it moreLike that Heck the paladins feel more like the purifiers from the xmen comics.
Yondu wasn't abusive though--at least, not compared to Ego. Also, love the use of "Super...you know the rest" in piano when he was introduced.
He was abusive, but it wasn't entirely his fault. All he knew in his life was abuse and he didn't really know what a loving parent looked like.
Still a good person deep down, but not without his ugly qualities.
Thanks! I knew from the word go that I'd be using that track somewhere. I'm surprised more people didn't latch on to the Father Son track afterwards, though.
(youll have to forgive the lack of enters/ spaces between the paragraph 's in this in this response. for some reason my computer doesn't save them in my youtube comments) I wouldn't say that's 100% true. even in the first GOTG movie we see Yondu threaten and bully quill hell he even slaps him a few times. and even in GOTG 2 we see there is a disconnect in Yondus actions and words , quill says right to his face that he was often frightened of Yondu growing up. For example Quill: You threatened to eat me Yondu: that was funny Quill: it wasn't to me and you can see how surprised Yondu was to hear this, he never even conceded that outcome. the thing with abuses is that they don't often see themselves as abusers, they like all people rationalize their actions. I making this person stronger, I'm better than the alternative. If I didn't do this this person would fail so I have to do it. so on and so on. just because Yondu didn't give quill to Ego, doesn't really mean he all that much better. yes quill forgave Yondu at the end and quill himself is what we would call an unreliable source of information but we cant help be see the damage Yondu's kind of 'parenting' had on quill. and we see the same kind of abusive relationship between Thanos and Gamora its even worse there as Thanos truly believes he's the hero of his own story so everything he's done to Gamora, Neblua and the other's is justified in his mind. in fact now that I think of it Quill, rocket and Gamora were all products of abusive relationship's. Quill had Yondu, rocket had whom ever turned him into rocket and Gamora had Thanos
The movie is definitely one big 'blah' but Griffin is a magnificent bastard. I like how they make it a point that he's willing to accept David because he's a fellow jumper but he's still a major psychopath and won't hesitate to kill David if he gets in his way. Wish we got more of him.
Jubilees powers are actually cool. Imagine being shot by a firework
Actually I thought Jackson was the good guy in this movie..........
So did I. David, as presented in this movie, was a genuinely horrible person with no regard for the lives of others, and Samuel L. Jackson was doing the world at large a service by putting a stop to his dangerous irresponsibility.
WenLi Yang
That is why the movie made him a religious Zealot. It was afraid the viewers would not understand he was supposed to be the bad guy if he was an Interpol agent or a bounty hunter hired by banks wanting their money back.
@@schwarzerritter5724 Talk about messing up when you can't even deliver to the viewer who's the good guy and who's the bad ;) It's one thing when it's characters in the grey area and the viewers are supposed to make their own decision, but that's not the case here, it's just a fail.
That makes no sense, why would anyone think a guy that goes around killing people is a good guy
Scott Summers It’s because the movie did such a horrible job at characterization and setting up the conflict.
The only two Jumpers we get to know are unrepentant thieves who endanger and kill others without remorse. Griffin likely killed two people and endangered dozens more from just his on-screen car stunts, plus he threatened to leave Millie to die on Everest just because she was involuntarily brought to his lair. Who knows how many other people he’s killed through carelessness or to cover up carelessness? David, despite his claim about not being a killer, likely killed Roland by stranding him in that cave; it’s unlikely Roland could have escaped on his own. That’s the third on-screen time he abandoned someone in an inaccessible location. He could easily have killed several people like that.
These two men are menaces to society. The Paladins’ methods are absolutely extreme, yet all evidence we were given points to their motivations - protecting the world from super powered criminals - being sound. Given how Jumpers need to be contained by electrocuting them, the alternative to killing them would be years or even a lifetime of torture. The Paladins may have viewed death as the more merciful option. All in all, even if we disagree with how they complete their mission, it’s still not hard to root for them.
I think the movie could have cleared this up by just showing us one Jumper who wasn’t an unrepentant criminal. What if a Jumper really had come to save people from that flood, only to get caught and executed by the Paladins? It could even have been that Jumper we saw Roland shank near the start of the movie. This would have properly demonstrated that the Paladins are executing innocent people simply for possessing ability, regardless of whether that ability is used responsibly.
I saw this movie with a girl who was a friend of my brother. I remember making jokes about it with her. I think that was actually the last time I saw her. Hmmmm, weird. Maybe she jumped to a new life
Anyway, I'm glad you were finally able to post this.
Oh my gosh Krimson THIS WAS SO WELL DONE! I needed this :) you’re freaking amazing dude
Thanks! Glad you enjoyed it! :D
Props to you for the Silent Hill film sequel reference.
Pop Tarts are the ultimate horror. The fear of breakfast tends to create fear for the meal.
Krimsonrouge saw Kristen Stewart and said "THATS IT" get the dvd and open and fire
Thanks for the vid man. I know it must have been hell getting it back up and we really appreciate it!
I feel like this movie is a crossover between the main jumper books and the alternative one with Griffin
i'm here to talk about the avenger initiative- this phrase by Nick Fury is awesome, someone should do a fanfiction of the book and this
Can we admit that skywalker's acting is kinda on point in this film. When his mom showed up in the room, the surprise, and fear are clear as day and he doesn't need to say anything.
And how he says "mom" hit me.
I remember seeing adds for this when it came out. Good to know I didn't miss much
I think him jumping a portion of the building is like an unlocked superpower that it’s been hidden inside him
Ahhhhh. I miss these TBWB episodes. Know if we’ll ever get any more? Soooo much fun.
Not enough people talk about Michael Grant's Gone series. It's so nice to see it on your shelf
i think i was a freshman when i watched the movie, and my naive young mind was too entranced in the action scenes and the fantasy of teleportation to see all that was wrong with it. i'm kind of glad though because if I hadn't liked the movie so much I probably never would have decided to read the book a few years later, it became one of my favorites.
oh now this makes me even more scared for the chaos walking movie that Doug Ligman is directing
He also did
The Bourne Identity and Edge of Tomorrow
So...
The premise, the action, and Jamie Bell as Griffin were the best part of this movie. While I like this movie for the most part, I hope they do a remake in the future that explores the premise a little better. It would benefit from a remake.
That spin-off book Griffin's Story is actually pretty good, though I might be biased since I read it before the original book. I think that's that sign of a good author. Hollywood makes a horrible movie 'based' off your book. Then you write a pretty good book 'based' on the horrible movie.
but like who wouldn't want to pick jubilee? ignoring the fact that she was a kick as vampire for a while, her "lame" mutant power gives her the ability to explode sub atomic-particles and create immense chain reactions capable of leveling buildings and potentially worlds. her little light shows are plasma nukes, she can make nuclear explosions that do not emit harmful radiation. in practice she has caused people holding hostages to explode without harming the hostages, how is that not a rank A power?
People rag on Jubilee, but he full powers are no joke.
Absolutely. She is a great character !
Made my day, Krimson is back!!
I love limited, seemingly unimpressive abilities in books and seeing authors come up with cool ways to use them.
Man I just discovered your channel and I absolutely love your videos man
Thanks! I'm glad you like them. :D
Everyone knows that Marrow's powers is where it's at. :|
"I was 15, what would you have done with Teleportation powers?"
Good question, I don't know.
I'd probably spend a good few hours thinking of what I'd even do with it.
Maybe It's because I'm autistic, maybe because I'm paranoid (Probably both.) I'd think of how I could easily use my powers to make me money that is neither Illegal nor morally dubious (These kind of powers could be easily used to get around certain loopholes about traversal as well afford me certain advantages no one else could do.).
I'd also probably use them to go visit a list of places I want to see (Scotland, Ireland, Wales, Cornwall, Isle of Mann, Finland, Greenland (I like the cold.), Christian Holy Sites (I might as well if I can just teleport anywhere.), Italy, Greece, Spain, Portugal, and wherever else that'd tickle my fancy.).
Probably use said wealth to afford decent, but not extravagant housing and pay off various house and car loans for the family. (I value pragmatism.) because anything extravagant would cost too much and would arouse suspicion and I really don't need it.
But Robbing a Bank or being a Creeper is not how I'd use them, even as a 15 year old as my mind hasn't changed particularly much since then.
.........Man, I spent way too much time contemplating that.
How that Goober never get's noticed till Samuel L. Jackson I cannot begin to fathom.
"They've been hunting us since Medieval times."
Stop, Stop, Stop..........
There were jumpers in the age where no one had the tech or weapons to properly fight let along track a Jumper?
How did one of them never use their powers to become some sort of Sorcerer/Wizard King?
Just imagine a Jumper in Medieval Axum, Just Conquering all of Arabia by Sowing Chaos amongst the enemy Nobility via a mixture of Stealth Jumping and given the time probably assassinations to destabilize their realms and then just conquer the entire peninsula.
Likewise, Imagine if Hannibal Barcid, his son, or one of his soldiers could just Pop over to Rome with some Troops and just take out the Roman Leader. Bam! Carthage beats Rome.
Like, this is some Timeline altering shit that would happen if this power was real and was a thing back then.
That's like the tip of the Iceberg of how that could and probably would change history.
There's no way Medieval Knights/Inquisitors could catch a jumper easily.
Holy shit Movie.
All good points. I kinda wish I had brought up your comment about medieval Paladins hunting Jumpers without the tech to stop them.
you underestimate religion (they would be considered witches/demons/dijins/etc) and power of assassination. Also how few of them they are, there were three in the whole world. Just look for the king with demonic powers and spread the news how he is a monster worshiping satan. Heck Vlad the Impaler could be jumper not vampire.
The Paladin's should hook up with the Magisterium (from the movie, not the books), seeing as they are equally effective in their movie universes.
When Michael Rooker was first mentioned I said to myself it would be funny if he reference the "i'm marry poppins yall" moment from guardians. Low and behold, Bravo! 🤣
It’s about three miniutes into the video that I realised ‘jumper’ is referring to someone who jumps and not a thick wooly sweater as it’s called a jumper in England and Australia.
I was so confused for a good while haha
I'm curious what a sweater-based magic system would look like. XD
@@KrimsonRogue This is late but I actually thought of a fun magic system based off of sweater (not quite clothing actually)
So basically the magic of this universe is made available through natural materials and subsequently clothing. And the more well made clothing made by trained weavers, the better and easier the magic inside it can be used and manipulated. Since it takes time for any weaver or tailor to become trained and a master, and clothing made by ametures can cause the magic to backfire if not weaved correctly, thus high quality magic clothing were only made available to the nobles and royalty.
Clothing for normal people usually have some magic in it (as it's still made from natural materials) but the magic can at most help people heal faster or keep warmer. Whilst the high quality clothing for nobles can allow them to fast track plant growth or blow fire and just much more elaborate and powerful.
There are clothing made of certain materials made available to people who do a specific job as 'uniform'. Blacksmiths for example have aprons with fire resistance magic and shopkeepers have outfits that allow them to subtly read someone else's mood or intent to better serve them or aware of potential shopkeepers.
Well weaved pieces of clothing are passed down the generation, from matriarch to patriarch, from grandparents to grandchildren. When clothing become unable to be worn, it will be cut up and each member of the family will be given a piece of the fabric as keep sake, turned into headbands or sewn into other clothing.
When the industrial ages arrived and massive weaving machines that could weave powerful magic into cloth just like any master weaver, magic then that were only available to the top of the hierarchy where made available to the everyday man. (more powerful magic were also used in wars by soldiers and not just commanders and had a big effect on how massive battles are fought as well)
This of course is amazing, making this previously exclusive powerful to everyone but this also brought on the age of fast fashion. Machine woven is fast and reliable, able to pump out many times over the amount a normal weaver can make a day but the quality in the fabric created is not the same. They often don't last nearly as long as man weaved cloth and the magic in the clothing, though powerful, are not able to be manipulated.
Ultimately its a critique on fast fashion as well as the up and down side of clothes made by massive conglomerations that show no care towards the clothing made nor the workers in the process.
Thanks for reviewing the book and movie. Jumper is one of my favorite novels, and the movie just butchered it. I really wish they could've kept the terrorism plot in some form along with Davy jumping NSA agents around the world and the final confrontation between Davy, his father, Brian Cox and Rashid Matar. The film wasted so much potential.
Keep up the good work.
You know the whole idea that Roland is the good guy seems pretty legit. David and Griffin are assholes through and through. David stole millions of dollars and clearly had no regard for anyone he stole from. Milly and his mom are exceptions because he likes them. Griffin is very reckless with powers and we know he’s killed an innocent indirectly. The dude is clearly not in the right mind. Roland however has good reason to fear Jumpers and their powers.
This is all absolutely correct. I could not stand this movie at all for the simple fact that it expected me to empathize with a character I hated.
In regards to "breaking canon" and "doing the impossible", that scene in the car is to explain that some Jumpers are able to do things that other Jumpers can't. Like being able to Jump moving objects being specifically pointed out comes across as an explanation that he's able to do something that others can't. This sets it up for David to be able to Jump a building later. Also, he's the freaking hero of the story, of course he's going to be able to do things that others can't!!!
I always wanted a sequel to this movie because of show it sets David up as being the "Neo" of the Jumper universe. Though I gotta ask... how was it not painfully obvious that is what they were doing?
Thats because you, me and several others would love a Trilogy out of these movies or maybe a reboot of the first movie. Have you seen the RUclips premium original series IMPULSE?
Been a long while since I seen the movie. For the longest, I didn't even know the book existed until now. O_O
Probably might give it another watch, I remember liking this movie a lot, most likely because of the concept. Think I might also give the book a try too. Honestly, I would love for this to be a comic book! That would be pretty cool. ^^
"I wish you you would step back from that ledge my friend.
You could cut ties with all the lies that you've been living in.
And if you do not want to see me again I would understand."
Sorry, someone had to make a joke like that at some point.
idk htf you ended up in my reccomended. But Im glad for it. Subbed and binging now
I’ve never forgotten this cool review 😊
Saw 2018 I think
This is my first video from this guy but seeing the Gone series in the background lets me know this guy has patrician taste.
I do like the idea of a movie adaptation at least changing it up a little bit, but it obviously has to make sense in the context of the story, and has to be ex excited properly, otherwise there isn't a point in making the change.
Glad you were finally able to upload this. :)
Hey don’t forget that there is now a RUclips show called Impulse. Based in the Jumper universe that doesn’t once reference David or Millie and just rolls with new characters and that show actually is really good but I would have loved if they had filled the source material and had created a jumper tv show which I think would have worked out better
There we go uploaded !
chior: *existence is brought to my attention*
me: rule 34 dont fail me now ♥
u should do impulse too even if its nothing like the books. both seasons are SO good its worth a watch at least
Man, Mace really hated Anakin...
"Inner Edward" 😂
1:49
5:20
I agree with you
They need to remake this movie into a t.v. Show.
One of the more aggravating things about that flood reference is that in later books, David spends a lot of time doing relief work in disaster zones by teleporting in supplies.
I like the movie mainly because I love to have the power to be everywhere
Raximus3000 true but teleport makes it sound like nightcrawler power and compare to this guys he is pretty limited
Read the book. It's a light and easy read with likable characters, some great action sequences, and some genuinely touching moments. Plus it's absolutely nothing like the movie, so it'll still be a brand new experience for you.
I watched the movie when I was young, love it concept so much to fantasize about teleportation.
I could get down on the mother part of the story. That wasn't bad at all. At least they kept it brief rather than the primary focus since they changed it.
Just for the record, I’d have Mystique’s power
I didn't know it was an adaptation until I saw the book on a Goodwill shelf. Made me want to read it since I liked the movie...now I realize it would've been an Eragon situation all over again (that movie can burn in hell for what it did to the book).
I actually really like the movie and it made me wants to read the book, which is 100% better !! But the fact that the movie introduced another jumper and paladin is interesting.
Theres a RUclips red series called impulse which is based of jumper books
It would've been good if they kept the NSA hunting David but only because they're headed in secret by the Paladins kind of like Abstergo being the modern Templar Knights hunting Assasssins for centuries.
Thoughts on the review:
i was entertained by it and the ending part of the review was my favorite. Though before I saw this I didn't know this even existed but after this review I'm interested in checking out the first book.
I remember reafing something a long time ago about them drastically changing the plot due to 9/11. Which, assuming I'm not mis-remebering, makes sense. Terrorists hijacking airplanes was likely more palatable in 1992 than in 2006 when filming began.
Krimson read my mind. And I forgot I don't have to sneak in
The biggest problem with teleportation that story like this rarely talk about is what I call the leap of faith problem, you can jump to the same spot many times and be fine but at some point something or even worse someone is going to be in that spot and you end op occupying the same space and as physics tells us 2 objects can not occupy the same space at the same time, so best case scenario (if you ask me) you jump your self inside a newly placed pole or something get cut in half and die, worse case scenario you jump inside someone they go splat and you probable still die, really they only way to fix this is by using portals that you can see thru before going in or be able to see a live image before jumping, I don't know if the book had something like that and it's been a long time since I've seen the movie but I'm pretty sure the movie didn't have that so at least at some point some people should have gone splat.
Edit: Also I had no idea BB guns could do that I always thought that at most it would sting a bit.
Honestly, I disagree. Nightcrawler, from what I remember, is just able to teleport exactly like this movie. Instead I think the problem is more that the elephant in the room is never addressed in any way. It's fine if there's that sort of risk involved, because all powers in superhero stories have drawbacks, but the story needs to state if that's the case and show the characters overcoming it. For example, My Hero Academia addresses this problem with Mirio. He has the ability to phase through things like a ghost, but like that implies, it also means that he risks sinking to the ground and suffocating and getting hurt by jumping into things and dying. He trains and uses his powers in such a way that risk is lessened if he actively thinks about his movements and steps. He's even able to sink into the ground and pop out and launch himself at people. Never read the book either, but I imagine an explanation like that would be in it.
You forgot that guy who only had the power of making his skin invisible, this showing his organs.
dave could easily save those people from that flood, it makes me mad how thoughtless he is in this movie which is exact opposite from him from the book
I totally forgot about Rachel Bilson till the moment I watched your review. And interesting to learn that she and Hayden Christiansen were involved/married for 10 years too. Didn't even know that, lol and apparently Emma Roberts caused their breakup?! Bravo, Hollywood!!
I wished Hayden Christensen and Liu Yifei went out on a date.
5:33-5:41 And that's the point where I want to slap the director and shout at him that he's lost the right to make movies.
Also, mutant whose powers I want: Magneto.
He also directed The Bourne Identity and Edge of Tomorrow, both seriously cool movies. Yeah this film was a turd, but he's still good in my book.
This was great, hope you do a review of Impulse!
I saw the movie in theaters 3 times. My ex gave me the book years ago. I quickly noted differences like you said. I read the book twice it was so good. Your videos was great
Jubilee is the worst X-Man? Uh, maybe when you compare her to the heavy hitters, but compared to the ones you mentioned, at least she could theoretically do more with her powers.
Jubilee, at the very least, could daze her opponents with light. Better than anything Skin can do.
agreed, the books were just much much better. and if you do get the chance, i would definitely read the entire series
I’ll always have an affinity for the movie but the books are great too.
I’m currently on the 2nd one in the jumper series “reflex”.
I have vivid memories of watching this film, but I have no idea when, where, why, or how I came about it, because I have never heard of this movie before.
When the movie came out, I really enjoyed. it. I still do, to an extent, though it's more of a guilty pleasure now. Because I liked the movie so much, I purchased a copy of Griffin's Story I chanced upon in a dollar store. It uses the Paladins from the movies, but makes Griffin a more cautious character as it follows him from age 11 to young adulthood. There's a lot of cool stuff, like how he creates a hideout that's impossible without teleporting. I recommend it. At a later time, I borrowed the original book from the school library and loved it far more than I ever did the movie.
The poor tree...
Tbh, if you look at this movie as a completely different standalone from the book, then it's just your average B-Grade action movie with the standard plot holes that commonly plague the 21st Century Media Outlets, in literally every department. From action to sci-fi and now even horror (Deep Blue Sea 2/Truth or Dare were terrible).
I'm just one of those simple kids that think the kids in the 20th Century had it better, especially with golden titles like "Alien".
I much prefer the modern age. Now I don't have to wait for Alien to come out. I can go watch it right now in theatrical quality on my 4k laptop.