As a graphic designer and a photographer it is scary. The point is although your graphics are better, some clients do not care. This ist also true for photography.
If an Ai can replace you then it’s a skill issue, as a creative you are solving business problems rather than pixel pushing, those who do not understand this are not your clients
I had the same experience -- it can do patterns pretty well but struggles with scenes, icons and objects. It's like the AI generated photos we've been seeing for months now -- it looks great at first glance but then you notice the subject has 7 fingers and their legs aren't quite where they are supposed to be.
I do not think so! The original and distinguish art would be in need. So a human graphic artist would do much greater than machines generative by all means and any matters.
I'm not a huge fan of the Adobe Illustrator generator. I've been playing with it to get something that resembles what I want and go to a graphic designer and tell them "like this" and I say "add in the missing legs". And "we only have 4 fingers not 7." Useful to send your graphic designer to give an idea.
35 years a a creative director / ceo and cco.... this is the 3rd time i have seen a paradigm shift..... lol.... loved your thoughts... reality: adapt and pivot ... shits already changed... and your all ready to late... peacee!
I for the first time used a generative AI (non Adobe) network for a clients project. The client gave an idea, which i plugged it into the software. Some of the images were not the best, others great. what impressed me was the quickness of it all. The amount of ideas I had on paper, would normally have taken a week, was shown to the client later that day. As for now it is still in the clients benfits to have and artist, for layout, color theory, the stuff we are good at. Will the network learn those things? Later that evening, I input "The Celebration of Entropy" it seemed fine with the idea of celebration. Entropy, not so much (how do you illustrate entropy?). It didn't get the juxtaposition of celebrating something that ends the existence of all? But it learns, fast. What happens when it can generate its own motives?
I feel like it makes it a bit better for artists. A general person would need to spend time learning prompts, etc. which sometimes they don't want to. As an artist, art history has never been more important + we can manipulate the art with our technical skills - we just have to present that and improve communication
Yeah but lets keep in mind that this tech is still pretty pre-mature. Even now, all these AI tech is already damn impressive at its job. In it current state, it will no doubt required user input in order to assist artist in their creative process, but what about in 10 years? what if by then, it got so good and effective to the point of not needing artist like us anymore? Would we be obsoleted by these machines? these software? because I can already see that happening. I mean think about it, why would anyone want to spend thousands on someone that may or may not be good at their job when these AI can spit out adaquate result for much less? I mean, what a time to be alive! I am excited and fear for the future of AI in the artworld at the same time. Can't decide which is scarier, fear of losing my job to an AI or fear of not being good enough to an AI.
I was really inspired by your video! It reminded me of another AI-based design tool I came across, known as Stylar ai. This web tool has a feel similar to Photoshop, offering features like LOGO design styles, and it's more user-friendly. However, it's still quite basic and seems to be in a beta phase.
AI uses human work to build on. It’s just a computer that learns how to identify things by name and then copies it. 😂😂. Not intimidated at all. AI should be scared of me lol.😅
We get it, how to deal with the machine. But there are the layman fans amongst us that don’t care if a human or machine does it. As long as they are entertained, out goes creativity and real human artists. Can’t teach a machine soul👈🏿🫡👍🏿
Bro have you tried uploading your own illustrations into firefly then text prompts and having that engine spit out something similar?! That shizz is the crazy area, you understand ?
Definitely a scary thought as a artist, just stumbled across your content while adapting from PC to iPad with my digital art.. blows my mind how many functions are capable with illustrator, photoshop, procreate on iPad, have hesitated the switch up until buying a apple pencil and seeing how amazing the technology is for us old school artist.. as for AI.. not sure it will ever be capable of taking the emotion, blood, sweat, frustrations, sore backs, eyes and hands that go into making a piece of art, that’s human and unique to each artist.. everything I have seen personally that is AI generated has a feel to it, borderline.. but almost can tell it’s not a humans work. What worries me is this is the start, if it is this good now imagine in 5 years…. Will graphic design, digital art even be a thing or will it be as simple as a 5 minute sketch or taking a photo to generate something we spend hours if not weeks, months on?
Нейросеть все равно плохо рисует, как будто трассировкой обработали всю область, пока что человек будет на 1 месте, это лишь инструмент для быстрой поставленной задачи
Lots of people aka clients don't know software and computers like us..also u could straight up use a ai generated image if it perfectly matches ur idea but most likely u will go trough all kinds of generations and then adapt to your own style.. U still need someone ..us..to say yeah this is dope...let's use it for this.. I love ai...making a full length cartoon animation movie was always a dream now I might be able to pull it off ..by myself...no 200 man team...no just me.. Love ai
It's not that hard to come up with an idea. I can also think of a delicious meal inside my head, does that mean I am a great cook if I tell my maid to cook it?
The results are most definitely junk, and i'm not scared but i'm the opposite of enthusiastic as well. I do understand the need to know what we're up against, and what's coming but what I don't understand is the quick adoption and enthusiasm from people to embrace features like this.
Some people don’t want to learn this stuff or ain’t into computer programs, with everything going faster and faster this can be a big help. I fix them afterwards because some have empty spaces between the shapes
Question… my adobe illustrator looks like the one in your tutorial learning how to use the tools in adobe. I notice most peoples adobe looks like the one on this video. How do I get the second row of tools on the left hand side? I just seem to have basic tools. I should mention I have AI on my iPad Pro. Not sure if that makes a difference. Also I didn’t get the update for the adobe generative A.I.
Do you see a tab called ‘Window” in your top navbar? Under that drop down you should be able to see all the tools that are available and check the ones you want to show up in your illustrator workflow.
Human artists will always be better but they take time and money. AI threat is that it will be good enough vs cost of a human artist. I got quoted 10k for some images but I’m now looking for good enough AI images that I can change/blend myself
Lets keep in mind that this tech is still pretty pre-mature. Even now, all these AI tech is already damn impressive at its job. In it current state, it will no doubt required user input in order to assist artist in their creative process, but what about in 10 years? what if by then, it got so good and effective to the point of not needing artist like us anymore? Would we be obsoleted by these machines? these software? because I can already see that happening. I mean think about it, why would anyone want to spend thousands on someone that may or may not be good at their job when these AI can spit out adaquate result for much less? I mean, what a time to be alive! I am excited and fear for the future of AI in the artworld at the same time. Can't decide which is scarier, fear of losing my job to an AI or fear of not being good enough to an AI.
I think AI is a great as a design tool. Much like pathfinder tool. I am not the best with colors, so I find the recolor feature to be awesome. I do agree that your designs were better suited as vector art. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
If you continue to give Adobe free input if it works it will get smarter - and smarter… therefore it DEPENDS ON DESIGNERS DOING THEIR FREE INPUT - MEANING YOU WILL DISPLACE TOUR JOBS by providing the improved performance …SO MAKE YOUR CHOICES CONSCIOUSLY - eventually you are voting for dismissal of you jobs
Your art looks like clipart, not necessarily something you drew (I know clipart is drawn, but I think you get my point). The A.I. stuff looks great. Artists think their art is the greatest thing since sliced bread, but you have to think with a normie mind when it comes to this stuff. Normies don't notice the flaws you notice, so they won't care. Never mind the fact that a year or two from now, A.I. is going to be twice (maybe 4x, actually) as good as it is now. I think you're eventually going to lose, just like the people who fought for a higher minimum wage have already started to lose. And to the same thing - a machine. Good luck.
Remember when artists who painted and sketched by hand used to say digital artists wouldn't beat "real art"? Well. Wait for it. Many might argue AI is not accurate and lacks the "human factor"... People, wake up. AI is learning, and it learns fast. There will come the day when not even sketching will be necessary. That would give us a lot of time to create faster and more efficiently. Welcome AI. Robots are here to stay.
As a graphic designer and a photographer it is scary. The point is although your graphics are better, some clients do not care. This ist also true for photography.
If an Ai can replace you then it’s a skill issue, as a creative you are solving business problems rather than pixel pushing, those who do not understand this are not your clients
I had the same experience -- it can do patterns pretty well but struggles with scenes, icons and objects. It's like the AI generated photos we've been seeing for months now -- it looks great at first glance but then you notice the subject has 7 fingers and their legs aren't quite where they are supposed to be.
But it will get better and better.
I do not think so! The original and distinguish art would be in need. So a human graphic artist would do much greater than machines generative by all means and any matters.
I'm not a huge fan of the Adobe Illustrator generator. I've been playing with it to get something that resembles what I want and go to a graphic designer and tell them "like this" and I say "add in the missing legs". And "we only have 4 fingers not 7."
Useful to send your graphic designer to give an idea.
35 years a a creative director / ceo and cco.... this is the 3rd time i have seen a paradigm shift..... lol.... loved your thoughts...
reality: adapt and pivot ...
shits already changed... and your all ready to late... peacee!
I for the first time used a generative AI (non Adobe) network for a clients project. The client gave an idea, which i plugged it into the software. Some of the images were not the best, others great. what impressed me was the quickness of it all. The amount of ideas I had on paper, would normally have taken a week, was shown to the client later that day. As for now it is still in the clients benfits to have and artist, for layout, color theory, the stuff we are good at. Will the network learn those things? Later that evening, I input "The Celebration of Entropy" it seemed fine with the idea of celebration. Entropy, not so much (how do you illustrate entropy?). It didn't get the juxtaposition of celebrating something that ends the existence of all? But it learns, fast. What happens when it can generate its own motives?
I feel like it makes it a bit better for artists. A general person would need to spend time learning prompts, etc. which sometimes they don't want to. As an artist, art history has never been more important + we can manipulate the art with our technical skills - we just have to present that and improve communication
Yeah but lets keep in mind that this tech is still pretty pre-mature. Even now, all these AI tech is already damn impressive at its job. In it current state, it will no doubt required user input in order to assist artist in their creative process, but what about in 10 years? what if by then, it got so good and effective to the point of not needing artist like us anymore? Would we be obsoleted by these machines? these software? because I can already see that happening. I mean think about it, why would anyone want to spend thousands on someone that may or may not be good at their job when these AI can spit out adaquate result for much less?
I mean, what a time to be alive! I am excited and fear for the future of AI in the artworld at the same time. Can't decide which is scarier, fear of losing my job to an AI or fear of not being good enough to an AI.
I was really inspired by your video! It reminded me of another AI-based design tool I came across, known as Stylar ai. This web tool has a feel similar to Photoshop, offering features like LOGO design styles, and it's more user-friendly. However, it's still quite basic and seems to be in a beta phase.
AI uses human work to build on. It’s just a computer that learns how to identify things by name and then copies it. 😂😂. Not intimidated at all. AI should be scared of me lol.😅
We get it, how to deal with the machine.
But there are the layman fans amongst us that don’t care if a human or machine does it.
As long as they are entertained, out goes creativity and real human artists.
Can’t teach a machine soul👈🏿🫡👍🏿
Bro have you tried uploading your own illustrations into firefly then text prompts and having that engine spit out something similar?! That shizz is the crazy area, you understand ?
Definitely a scary thought as a artist, just stumbled across your content while adapting from PC to iPad with my digital art.. blows my mind how many functions are capable with illustrator, photoshop, procreate on iPad, have hesitated the switch up until buying a apple pencil and seeing how amazing the technology is for us old school artist.. as for AI.. not sure it will ever be capable of taking the emotion, blood, sweat, frustrations, sore backs, eyes and hands that go into making a piece of art, that’s human and unique to each artist.. everything I have seen personally that is AI generated has a feel to it, borderline.. but almost can tell it’s not a humans work. What worries me is this is the start, if it is this good now imagine in 5 years…. Will graphic design, digital art even be a thing or will it be as simple as a 5 minute sketch or taking a photo to generate something we spend hours if not weeks, months on?
They shouldn't have released the icon type yet, it's clearly not ready, yet. Results are horrible on my side and not usable at all
Can I generate my own custom style assets and use them to generate Art through beta prompts?
Too bad AI doesn't work with latest pirated Illustrator CC version
I just HATE ai, period
why
I do too
Нейросеть все равно плохо рисует, как будто трассировкой обработали всю область, пока что человек будет на 1 месте, это лишь инструмент для быстрой поставленной задачи
i am excited and scared at the same time. these features are great and some good work has gone into this
Lots of people aka clients don't know software and computers like us..also u could straight up use a ai generated image if it perfectly matches ur idea but most likely u will go trough all kinds of generations and then adapt to your own style..
U still need someone ..us..to say yeah this is dope...let's use it for this..
I love ai...making a full length cartoon animation movie was always a dream now I might be able to pull it off ..by myself...no 200 man team...no just me..
Love ai
I’m a textile designer and this is why I am no longer needed
I'm really not worried no matter how good AI is it can't beat human creativity
It's not that hard to come up with an idea. I can also think of a delicious meal inside my head, does that mean I am a great cook if I tell my maid to cook it?
Don’t forget the extra legs and fingers
The results are most definitely junk, and i'm not scared but i'm the opposite of enthusiastic as well. I do understand the need to know what we're up against, and what's coming but what I don't understand is the quick adoption and enthusiasm from people to embrace features like this.
Some people don’t want to learn this stuff or ain’t into computer programs, with everything going faster and faster this can be a big help. I fix them afterwards because some have empty spaces between the shapes
Wow that sounds hard... fixing the empty spaces between the shapes...
Question… my adobe illustrator looks like the one in your tutorial learning how to use the tools in adobe. I notice most peoples adobe looks like the one on this video. How do I get the second row of tools on the left hand side? I just seem to have basic tools. I should mention I have AI on my iPad Pro. Not sure if that makes a difference. Also I didn’t get the update for the adobe generative A.I.
Do you see a tab called ‘Window” in your top navbar? Under that drop down you should be able to see all the tools that are available and check the ones you want to show up in your illustrator workflow.
Human artists will always be better but they take time and money. AI threat is that it will be good enough vs cost of a human artist. I got quoted 10k for some images but I’m now looking for good enough AI images that I can change/blend myself
AI is very helpful for designers
If I was a designer I would go back to college etc. By 2030 the AI will be infinitely more capable… (I’m in IT).
Lets keep in mind that this tech is still pretty pre-mature. Even now, all these AI tech is already damn impressive at its job. In it current state, it will no doubt required user input in order to assist artist in their creative process, but what about in 10 years? what if by then, it got so good and effective to the point of not needing artist like us anymore? Would we be obsoleted by these machines? these software? because I can already see that happening. I mean think about it, why would anyone want to spend thousands on someone that may or may not be good at their job when these AI can spit out adaquate result for much less?
I mean, what a time to be alive! I am excited and fear for the future of AI in the artworld at the same time. Can't decide which is scarier, fear of losing my job to an AI or fear of not being good enough to an AI.
i think the process of this is just generating it with ai then vector it
I think AI is a great as a design tool. Much like pathfinder tool. I am not the best with colors, so I find the recolor feature to be awesome. I do agree that your designs were better suited as vector art. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
Love to use AI to generate some ideas
they are pre made images by someone and nothing about self drawing ai is a myth
Wow
If you continue to give Adobe free input if it works it will get smarter - and smarter… therefore it DEPENDS ON DESIGNERS DOING THEIR FREE INPUT - MEANING YOU WILL DISPLACE TOUR JOBS by providing the improved performance …SO MAKE YOUR CHOICES CONSCIOUSLY - eventually you are voting for dismissal of you jobs
It's terrible so far - thankfully.
It's just a matter of time, and AI illustrations will be much more good !
Your art looks like clipart, not necessarily something you drew (I know clipart is drawn, but I think you get my point). The A.I. stuff looks great. Artists think their art is the greatest thing since sliced bread, but you have to think with a normie mind when it comes to this stuff. Normies don't notice the flaws you notice, so they won't care. Never mind the fact that a year or two from now, A.I. is going to be twice (maybe 4x, actually) as good as it is now. I think you're eventually going to lose, just like the people who fought for a higher minimum wage have already started to lose. And to the same thing - a machine. Good luck.
everything is mess and big Sh...t...
liar title out of content subject !!!
Adapt...Evolve...or Go Extinct!
It SUCKS - NO GO LOL…
honestly ai is saved me alot of money from actually paying artists for like logos and background art and such
Why would you not want to pay an artist? Do you get paid for the work that you do?
...and that's the problem.
@@thedeetails8816 nah even if i did i still wouldn't lol it saves money.
@@wayfairing_soul how is that the problem some of these artists wildin with the prices for commissions and shiz
When you invest in your craft tools supplies learning perfecting you absolutely deserve what you charge. That’s for anything you do.
Remember when artists who painted and sketched by hand used to say digital artists wouldn't beat "real art"?
Well. Wait for it. Many might argue AI is not accurate and lacks the "human factor"... People, wake up. AI is learning, and it learns fast.
There will come the day when not even sketching will be necessary. That would give us a lot of time to create faster and more efficiently. Welcome AI. Robots are here to stay.
there is a life cycle to everything, including professions and jobs. humans overestimate their level of creativity, this is a beautiful reality check.