@stefanbanev That means there is no direct proof of a direct common ancestor In physical evidence we're humans and Apes stemmed of so let's not say this is a fact.
@@infinitewisdom8594 >"That means there is no direct proof of a direct common ancestor In physical evidence we're humans and Apes stemmed" It does not mean that at all, it means exactly an opposite, as soon as you are capable to see it; if you are not capable then indeed you do not see it...
Thanks ,great program ;comparitive context & information.
What do u think of spenoid flexion idea that drives evolution?
Where is the direct common ancestor where humans and Apes stemmed from?
Sure, any single-celled prokaryotic organism may represent such common ancestor….
@stefanbanev 🤣
@stefanbanev That means there is no direct proof of a direct common ancestor In physical evidence we're humans and Apes stemmed of so let's not say this is a fact.
@@infinitewisdom8594 >"That means there is no direct proof of a direct common ancestor In physical evidence we're humans and Apes stemmed"
It does not mean that at all, it means exactly an opposite, as soon as you are capable to see it; if you are not capable then indeed you do not see it...
@stefanbanev But I want to physically See it. if you can't show it don't make silly claims
Blondes and redheads go back a million years.
curious to whether Homo erectus was closer to chimpanzees or closer to Homo sapiens with Down syndrome, especially in language ability
it depends on the specific samples you compare...